Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 27 May 2022
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.939744

Corrigendum: Association Between Recycled Manure Solids Bedding and Subclinical Mastitis Incidence: A Canadian Cohort Study

This article is a correction to:

  1. Association Between Recycled Manure Solids Bedding and Subclinical Mastitis Incidence: A Canadian Cohort Study

    1. Read original article
\nAnnie Frchette,, Annie Fréchette1,2,3*Gilles Fecteau,Gilles Fecteau1,4Caroline Ct,,Caroline Côté1,3,5Simon Dufour,,Simon Dufour1,2,3
  • 1Regroupement FRQ-NT Op+Lait, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
  • 2Mastitis Network, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
  • 3Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • 4Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • 5Research and Development Institute for the Agri-Environment (IRDA), Québec City, QC, Canada

A Corrigendum on
Association Between Recycled Manure Solids Bedding and Subclinical Mastitis Incidence: A Canadian Cohort Study

by Fréchette, A., Fecteau, G., Côté, C., and Dufour, S. (2022). Front. Vet. Sci. 9:859858. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.859858

In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2, 3, and 4 as published. Data alignment problems were present in these tables. The corrected Tables 2, 3, and 4 appears below.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Impact of bedding on the cow's mean lactation linear score estimated using a generalized linear mixed model using the data from 15,161 lactations of 11,031 cows from 20 recycled manure solids (RMS) farms and 60 straw-bedded farms.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Impact of bedding type on the risk of a DHI test with a linear score >4.0 in 11,031 cows from 20 RMS farms and 60 straw-bedded farms and estimated using a generalized linear mixed model.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Risk of acquiring a new subclinical mastitis as function of bedding type estimated using a generalized linear mixed model applied to 43,546 pairs of DHI tests from 11,031 cows from 20 RMS farms and 60 straw-bedded farms.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: bedding, subclinical mastitis, somatic cell count, recycled manure solids (RMS), dairy cows

Citation: Fréchette A, Fecteau G, Côté C and Dufour S (2022) Corrigendum: Association Between Recycled Manure Solids Bedding and Subclinical Mastitis Incidence: A Canadian Cohort Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:939744. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.939744

Received: 09 May 2022; Accepted: 10 May 2022;
Published: 27 May 2022.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2022 Fréchette, Fecteau, Côté and Dufour. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Annie Fréchette, YW5uaWUuZnJlY2hldHRlLjImI3gwMDA0MDt1bW9udHJlYWwuY2E=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.