Yadav Uprety
Sangram Karki2
Ripu M. Kunwar- 1Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
- 2Forest Research and Training Centre, Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal
- 3Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Kathmandu, Nepal
- 4Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Traditional herbal remedies are used worldwide for treating both human and livestock health issues. Though such uses are relatively well-explored for humans, the ethnoveterinary uses of plant-based remedies in the healthcare choices of livestock in Nepal and associated knowledge are largely ignored. This is important as sustainable livestock production is an emerging issue. This study reviews the existing ethnobotanical studies conducted in Nepal and reports the use of 393 species of plants from 114 botanical families in ethnoveterinary practices. Thirty-four different ailments were treated using these plants. The present review revealed that Nepal has a rich diversity of ethnoveterinary plants. This study shows that traditional herbal medicine plays a significant role in meeting the livestock healthcare needs of Nepali farmers and hence is a viable practice. The study also contributes a wealth of knowledge about ethnoveterinary practices for further planning and use. This will provide an option for livestock farmers who cannot afford allopathic medicine or who are not allowed to use such medicine under organic farming schemes that are likely to be a part of sustainable livestock farming programs in Nepal soon.
Introduction
Ethnoveterinary knowledge is deeply rooted in many traditional cultures and is an integral part of subsistence animal husbandry in many societies across the globe, including Nepal (1–4), India (5), Pakistan (6), Ethiopia (7), Romania (8), Spain (9), Switzerland (10), and elsewhere. Hailed as a traditional system and currently emerging as a scientific discipline, ethnoveterinary research, defined as “systematic investigation and application of veterinary folk knowledge, theory, and practice,” McCorkle (11) however, has little contribution to modern veterinary health sciences (12).
Animal rearing is the major occupation, the main source of livelihood, and a symbol of socioeconomic status for most of the population in Nepal. The livestock sector is one of the major contributors to the national Gross Domestic Product. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Development, Government of Nepal (13), 87% of the country's population keeps some form of livestock at home; with 5.8 heads of livestock and poultry per household, Nepal has one of the highest ratios of livestock to humans in Asia (14). Nepal's livestock numbers are estimated to be 7.27 million cattle, 5.24 million buffaloes, 10.17 million goats, 0.8 million sheep, 48 million poultry, and 0.37 million ducks (15). This sector contributes around 11% to the national Gross Domestic Product and also has a high potential for growth (15).
Because of a lack of resources and modern veterinary facilities, most livestock raisers in Nepal practice herbal remedies to treat various livestock ailments. This could be an advantage rather than an issue for the livestock sector as there is a growing interest in organic livestock management. Herbal remedies may be considered one of the most important alternatives to treating organic livestock (16). The use of such low-cost medicinal plants is widespread among organic livestock raisers (17) and promoted for their sustainable use (16). As Nepal still practices traditional farming that relies on local resources and integrates crops and livestock, integrating ethnoveterinary practices into livestock management would be a sustainable approach. However, this needs to be integrated into the research, extension, and policy frameworks. Furthermore, as estimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the global demand for livestock-related products will increase by more than 50% by 2050, and the use of low-cost medicinal plants can contribute to even large-scale livestock farming. The research and policy interventions in this direction also contribute to food security and climate change mitigation.
The knowledge regarding the traditional use of plants in veterinary medicine has been preserved by practice and oral transmission as that of plant-based traditional medicines used for humans [e.g., (18, 19)]. Though these uses are relatively well-explored for humans, the ethnoveterinary uses of plant-based remedies in the healthcare choices of livestock in Nepal and associated knowledge are largely ignored. Many of the ethnobotanical studies conducted in Nepal have documented veterinary uses of medicinal plants along with documentation of medicinal plants used to treat human health issues contributing to the wealth of ethnoveterinary knowledge (1–3, 20, 21). Nevertheless, there are also a few studies particularly focused on ethnoveterinary uses of plants in Nepal [e.g., (4, 22, 23)].
In this paper, we reviewed the existing ethnobotanical studies conducted in Nepal and documented the knowledge of ethnoveterinary practices to appraise how traditional systems are associated with livestock health issues. The study also contributes to the wealth of knowledge of ethnoveterinary practices for further planning and use, as this will provide an option for livestock farmers who cannot afford allopathic medicine or who are not allowed to use such medicine under organic farming schemes that are likely to be a part of sustainable livestock farming programs in Nepal soon.
Methods
Data collection
We reviewed ethnobotanical studies published from Nepal in journals and proceedings from 1955 to 2022. As many of the ethnobotanical studies have also documented ethnoveterinary uses of plants, we first collected pertinent literature in Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Science Direct using specific keywords such as “medicinal plants,” “herbal medicine,” “ethnobotany,” “traditional knowledge,” “herbal practice,” and “Nepal.” Then, we used keywords such as “veterinary,” “animal(s),” “cattle” and “livestock” to find the species within the papers. However, as we saw that not always these terms were used in the source we also used keywords such as “goat,” “sheep,” “buffalo,” “cow,” “ox,” “poultry,” “duck,” and “yak,” as these are the common livestock in Nepal being managed in animal husbandry.
Data analysis
Of the total 254 papers dealing with ethnomedicinal uses practiced in Nepal, we used 104 papers to prepare the master list of plant species used in ethnoveterinary. We further analyzed the papers into two categories—specific papers with a focus on ethnoveterinary and the general ethnobotanical papers having ethnoveterinary as one of the uses. The precision of botanical identification of species in this paper depended on that from original sources. Latin names and family names were verified in the Catalog of Life 2022 (https://www.catalogueoflife.org/). If the original name had been changed to another accepted name and was different from the original source we provided accepted names. We also provided a synonym for the accepted name if the accepted name in the original sources is now changed to a synonym. The master list of plants was further analyzed to categorize plants into different botanical families, growth forms, and parts used. The species associated with various ailments were also discussed. We followed Cook (24) to cluster plants according to the different ailment categories they help to cure.
Results and discussion
Ethnoveterinary studies conducted in Nepal
Of the total 254 papers on the ethnobotany of Nepal published from 1955 to date, 104 papers have contributed to the wealth of ethnoveterinary knowledge. The earliest ethnoveterinary use of the plant was found to be published in 1980 (1), though Sacherer (25) reported using poisonous plants for livestock in 1979. Of these 104 papers, only nine specifically dealt with ethnoveterinary (4, 22, 23, 26–31) while the rest were on general ethnobotany. Only a few of the publications reported information about herbal toxic effects, dosage, and conservation but the majority of the publications lacked this information, as also reported from Ethiopia (7). The records were reported from 54 districts out of 77 in Nepal. Of the total, 10 studies are reported from the Makwanpur district alone followed by Darchula (9), Kaski and Kavre (7 each), and Morang (6). These studies show that the animal husbandry in Nepal is largely intrigued by the ethnoveterinary practices. Furthermore, most of the studies cover the mid-hills of Nepal, where livestock holding size is highest (32) and the collection, use, and trade of medicinal plants are common (33).
Ethnoveterinary plants: Diversity and distribution
A total of 393 species belonging to 114 botanical families were reported to be used to treat different livestock ailments in Nepal (additional file). Angiosperms were represented by 102 families followed by Pteridophytes (five families), Gymnosperms (4), Fungi (2), and Lichens (1). Sixty-two botanical families were represented by single species, 13 families were represented by two species and 36 families were represented by three or more species. The largest family with 38 species was Fabaceae, followed by Asteraceae (21), Lamiaceae (17), Poaceae (14), Ranunculaceae (14), Polygonaceae (12), Cucurbitaceae (11), Moraceae (11), Rutaceae (11), Apiaceae (10), and Apocynaceae (10) (Figure 1). Species from the families Fabaceae, Asteraceae, and Lamiaceae are also the most important ethnoveterinary flora in Europe (16). Fabaceae is also reported to be one of the largest families in ethnoveterinary flora in Ethiopia (7). Likewise, Fabaceae and Lamiaceae are among the largest families of ethnoveterinary flora in South Asia (34) and Spain (35). Similarly, species from Asteraceae and Lamiaceae are reported to be extensively used in other studies that documented human use of medicinal plants (36, 37). Ficus (with seven species), Delphinium (6), Prunus (5), and Bauhinia, Brassica, Persicaria, and Solanum each with four species were the most common genera.
Figure 1. Dominant families with respect to species (families having three or more species are presented).
In terms of growth forms, herbs were dominant with 188 species followed by trees (95) and shrubs (54) (Figure 2). In terms of plant parts used, the leaves were the most frequently used parts followed by roots, fruits/seeds, whole plant, bark, stem, rhizomes, oil/resin/latex, aerial parts, and flowers (Table 1, Supplementary Table). Leaves were also the most frequently used parts in ethnoveterinary in Namibia (38).
Figure 2. Species distribution according to plant growth forms.
Table 1. Plant parts used and number of species.
A chord diagram was used to see the relationship between plant growth forms and parts used (Figure 3). For this purpose, plant growth forms were differentiated into six forms, namely, climber, herb, shrub, tree, parasite, and others. Plant growth forms under the “Others” category include fern, fungus, and lichens. Likewise, plant parts were categorized into six forms for easier interpretation and presentation: whole plant, shoot, root, leaf, bark, flower/fruit/seed, and others. Flowers, fruits, seeds, and nectar were classified under one category and abbreviated as FFS, and stem and aerial parts were placed under “Shoot.” Roots, rhizome, tuber, and bulb were categorized and analyzed as “Root.” “Other” category includes Sap, Latex, and Resin (SLR). From the analysis of the diagram, we could assert that roots and leaves from herbs were the most frequently used parts whereas shrubs were less chosen for animal healthcare.
Figure 3. Chord diagram showing plant growth forms and parts used (see main text for abbreviations).
In terms of distribution of ethnoveterinary plant species, the highest number of species is reported from the mid-hills, followed by Tarai and Siwaliks, and mountains (Table 2). It is interesting to note that there is a correspondence between the relative abundance of different plant species that are present in a particular physiographic region and the number of ethnobotanical studies conducted in that region (Table 2). Mid-hills also hold the highest number of medicinal plants used by the humans (127). The possible reason for the use of medicinal plants both for livestock and humans in mid-hills could be attributed to the presence of a higher population of both livestock and humans and diverse ethnic groups (32, 33, 127). As most of these species have a wide distribution throughout Nepal, dissemination of information on the use of these species can promote their use for livestock management.
Table 2. Distribution of ethnoveterinary plant species in different physiographic regions of Nepal based on the literature.
Number of reported ethnoveterinary uses and livestock ailments treated
Of the total 393 species, 33 species were found to be most frequently cited in the literature, where Cannabis sativa had 24 citations followed by Asparagus racemosus (18), Schima wallichii (13), Alstonia scholaris (11), Lindera neesiana (11) and Senna tora (10). The species having a minimum of five citations are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Most frequently cited ethnoveterinary plant species.
The literature revealed that 213 plant species had a single ethnoveterinary use, while 180 species had multiple uses. Ninety-three species had more than two uses, where Cannabis sativa and Cuscuta reflexa had the highest number of reported uses (10), followed by Bombax ceiba (9).
Altogether, 34 ailments were treated with 393 species (Table 4). The highest number of remedies involving plants (111 species) were for the treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders followed by the species used to treat infections and infestations (65), genitourinary system disorders (60), pregnancy/lactation/puerperium disorders (60), and muscular-skeletal system disorders (59). Bartha et al. (8) also reported similar veterinary ailments treated by various plant species in Romania. Some of the most common infectious diseases prevailing in Nepal such as foot and mouth disease (FMD), and hemorrhagic septicemia (129) are also treated using a number of plant species in various ethnoveterinary practices. Angiopteris evecta, Brucea javanica, Erythrina stricta, Ficus religiosa, Fragaria nubicola, Nyctanthes arbor-tristis, Prunus persica, Vigna radiata and Zingiber officinale are used to treat FMD, whereas hemorrhagic septicemia is treated using species such as Maesa macrophylla and Tridax procumbens. With particular regard to the use of some plant species such as Cannabis sativa and Cassia fistula in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders of livestock, ethnoveterinary practices in Nepal seem comparable to those reported in Pakistan (6). Conversely, the uses of Allium sativum and Juglans regia, for example, are different from those reported from Romania (8), indicating that cultural practices determine the ways in which plants are used (130). Herbal preparations were applied externally and internally based on the ailments.
Table 4. Number of plant species used to treat various livestock ailments/uses.
Livestock species in which ethnoveterinary uses of plant species were practiced are not specified in the majority of the literature. The majority of them had broad indications such as “used in veterinary medicine,” (39, 113) “given to animals,” (110) and “remove lice from the body of animals” (26). Only a few literature have specifically indicated the livestock species such as “fed to cattle as anthelmintic medicine,” (71) “antiseptic on wounds in cattle,” (2) “applied to get rid of lice and ectoparasites of the sheep,” (31) “given to cows to increase milk production,” (77) “given to sterile female buffalo/cow,” (97) and “given to yaks and sheep to relieve from fever” (4).
Twenty-four species of the plants are also reported to be poisonous to cattle. The most cited poisonous plant species is Lyonia ovalifolia (1, 29, 48, 85, 114, 118). The knowledge regarding various toxic and poisonous species is considered a prerequisite for safe grazing as grazing on such species could be fatal resulting in economic loss and thus this knowledge holds value for healthy livestock farming (35). Among toxic and poisonous species, some are used externally to treat wounds and skin diseases (Boenninghausenia albiflora, Bupleurum candollei, Crotalaria spectabilis, Lyonia ovalifolia, and Pieris formosa) and as an antiectoparasitic (Boenninghausenia albiflora, Prunus armeniaca); while leaves are poisonous, the bark juice of Osyris wightiana is given in indigestion.
Conclusions
The present review revealed that Nepal has a rich diversity of ethnoveterinary plants. This study further shows that traditional herbal medicine is playing a significant role in meeting the livestock healthcare needs of Nepali farmers and hence is a sustainable practice. Some of the plants reported in the literature are widely used and also abundantly available in the wild. Further studies on phytochemical and pharmacological profiles, including toxicological and clinical studies of interesting ethnoveterinary plants are necessary to contribute to modern veterinary health care choices based on these traditional herbal remedies. It is equally important to safeguard the traditional knowledge and local flora by raising awareness among the local people about the importance of their knowledge and plants. If further research and development are possible by using traditional knowledge leading to drug discovery, the access and benefit sharing process and laws under the Nagoya Protocol should be applied to ensure the rights and responsibilities of users and providers of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge (131).
Author contributions
YU, RK, and RP designed the study, reviewed the literature, analyzed the data, and refined the drafts. SK and RP cross-checked the data and analyses and reviewed the drafts. All authors proofread the manuscript.
Funding
Partial funding for article processing charge was received from the University Grant Commission, Nepal and Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Lalitpur. Authors are thankful to these funding organizations.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.930533/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Manandhar NP. Some Less Known Medicinal Plants of Rasuwa district. Quaternary J Crude Drug Res. (1980) 3:147–51. doi: 10.3109/13880208009065195
2. Bhattarai NK. Traditional Phytotherapy among Sherpas of Helambu, Central Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. (1989) 27: 45–54 doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(89)90076-7
3. Rokaya MB, Münzbergováa Z, Timsina B. Ethnobotanical Study of medicinal plants from the Humla district of Western Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. (2010) 130:485–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.036
4. Shrestha I, Khadgi P. Herbal veterinary practices by tamang community in Central Nepal. NUTA J. (2019) 6:5–11. doi: 10.3126/nutaj.v6i1-2.23220
5. Das SK, Tripathi H. Ethnoveterinary practices and socio-cultural values associated with animal husbandry in rural Sunderbans, West Bengal. Indian J Trad Know. (2009) 8:201–5.
6. Aziz MA, Adnan M, Khan AH, Sufyan M, Khan SN. Cross-cultural analysis of medicinal plants commonly used in ethnoveterinary practices at South Waziristan agency and Bajaur Agency, Federally administrated tribal areas (FATA), Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol. (2018) 210:443–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.09.007
7. Tilahun M, Etifu M, Shewage T. Plant diversity and ethnoveterinary practices of ethiopia: a systematic review. Evi-Based Complement Alternat Med. (2019). doi: 10.1155/2019/5276824
8. Bartha SG, Quave CL, Balogh L, Papp N. Ethnoveterinary practices of Covasna County, Transylvania, Romania. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2015) 11:8. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0020-8
9. Benítez G, González-Tejero MR, Molero-Mesa J. Knowledge of ethnoveterinary medicine in the Province of Granada, Andalusia, Spain. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. (2012) 139:429–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.11.029
10. Disler M, Ivemeyer S, Hamburger M, Vogl CR, Tesic A, Klarer F, et al. Ethnoveterinary herbal remedies used by farmers in four north-eastern Swiss cantons (St. Gallen, Thurgau, Appenzell Innerrhoden and Appenzell Ausserrhoden). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2014) 10:32. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-32
12. Pieroni A, Howard P, Volpato G, Santoro RF. Natural remedies and nutraceuticals used in ethnoveterinary practices in Inland Southern Italy. Vet Res Commun. (2004) 28:55–80. doi: 10.1023/B:VERC.0000009535.96676.eb
13. MoAD. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture. Ministry of Agricultural Development. Agribusiness Promotion and Statistics Division, Agri Statistics Section, Singhdurbar, Kathmandu Nepal. (2012) (accessed February 10, 2022).
14. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Livestock sector brief Nepal. Kathmandu: FAO (2005) (accessed May 01, 2022).
15. MoLD. Livestock Statistics of Nepal. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Ministry of Livestock Development (2017).
16. Mayer M, Vogl CR, Amorena M, Hamburger M, Walkenhorst M. Treatment of organic livestock with medicinal plants: a systematic review of European ethnoveterinary research. Complemen Med Res. (2014) 21:375–86. doi: 10.1159/000370216
17. Lans C, Turner N, Khan T. Medicinal plant treatments for fleas and ear problems of cats and dogs in British Columbia, Canada. Parasitol Res. (2008) 103:889–98. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1073-6
18. Manandhar NP. An Inventory of Some Herbal Drugs of Myagdi District, Nepal. Economic Botany. (1995) 49:371–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02863087
19. Bhandari P, Gurung MB, Subedi CK, Chaudhary RP, Basnet K, Gurung J. Traditional use of medicinal plants in the chyangthapu-phalaicha biological sub-corridor, Panchthar district, Kangchenjunga Landscape, Nepal. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. (2021) 22:1–43. doi: 10.32859/era.22.25.1-43
20. Shrestha PM, Dhillion SS. Medicinal plant diversity and use in the highlands of Dolakha district, Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. (2003) 86:81–96. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00051-5
21. Uprety Y, Asselin H, Boon EK, Yadav S, Shrestha KK. Indigenous use and bio-efficacy of medicinal plants in the Rasuwa District, Central Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2010) 6:3. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-6-3
22. Malla B, Chhetri RB. Ethnoveterinary practices of some plant species by ethnic people of Parbat district, Nepal. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Engin Technol. (2012) 8:44–50. doi: 10.3126/kuset.v8i1.6042
23. Gyawali RR, Paudel H.R. Plant bio-resources used in ethno-veterinary practices in Jumla District. Nepalese Vet J. (2017) 34:128–34. doi: 10.3126/nvj.v34i0.22915
25. Sacherer J. The high altitude ethnobotany of the Rolwaling Sherpas: a contribution of Nepalese studies. Jour Res Cen Nep Stud CNAS. (1979) 6:46–64.
26. Dhakal A, Khanal S, Pandey M. Ethnoveterinary practice of medicinal plants in Chhatradev Rural Municipality, Arghakhanchi District of Western Nepal. Nusantara Biosci. (2021) 13:105. doi: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n130105
27. Raut B, Shrestha AP. Ethnoveterinary Practices in Western Morang, Nepal. International J Pharmaceut Sci Res. (2012) 3:182.
28. Acharya K.P., Acharya M. Traditional knowledge on medicinal plants used for the treatment of livestock diseases in Sardikhola VDC, Kaski, Nepal. J Med Plants Res. (2010) 4:235–239.
30. Chaudhary RP. Plants used in treatment of domestic cattle in Narayani Zone (Central Nepal). In: Proceeding of Second National Conference on Science and Technology. Kathmandu, Nepal. (1994).
31. Manandhar NP. Ethnoveterinary medicinal drugs of central development region of Nepal. Bull Medico Ethnobotanical Res. (1989) 10:93–9.
32. Baral K, Sharma HP, Kunwar R, Morley C, Aryal A, Rimal B, Ji W. Human wildlife conflict and impacts on livelihood: a study in community forestry system in mid-hills of Nepal. Sustainability. (2021) 13:3170. doi: 10.3390/su132313170
33. Kunwar RM, Fadiman M, Thapa S, Acharya RP, Cameron M, Bussmann RW. Plant use values and phytosociological indicators: implications for conservation in the Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. Ecol Indic. (2020) 108:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105679
34. Suroowan S, Javeed F, Ahmad M, Zafar M, Noor MJ, Kayani S, et al. Ethnoveterinary health management practices using medicinal plants in South Asia–a review. Vet Res Commun. (2017) 41:147–68. doi: 10.1007/s11259-017-9683-z
35. Rivera D, Verde A, Fajardo Rodríguez J, Ríos S, Alcaraz F, Cárceles C, et al. Ethnoveterinary and ethnopharmacology in the main transhumance areas of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Front Veterinary Sci. (2022) 3:501. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.866132
36. Kapur SK, Shahi AK, Sarin YK, Daniel E. The medicinal flora of Majouri-Kirchi forests (Jammu and Kashmir State), India. J Ethnopharmacol. (2019) 36:87–90. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(92)90064-X
37. Kindscher K, Corbett S, Mcclure K, Kindscher K, Corbett S, Mcclure K. A statistical analysis of medicinal plants: a case study of plant families in Kansas and the Great Plains. Trans Kansas Acad Sc. (2013) 116:149–55. doi: 10.1660/062.116.0308
38. Eiki N, Maake M, Lebelo S, Sakong B, Sebola N, Mabelebele M. Survey of ethnoveterinary medicines used to treat livestock diseases in Omusati and Kunene Regions of Namibia. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:762771. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.762771
39. Dangol DR. Economic resources of forest plant resources in Chitwan, Nepal. Banko Janakari. (2002) 12:56–64.
40. Acharya E, Pokhrel B. Ethnomedicinal Plants Used by Bantar of Bhaudaha, Morang, Nepal. Our nature. (2006) 4:96–103. doi: 10.3126/on.v4i1.508
41. Bhattarai S, Chaudhary RP, Taylor RL. Ethno-medicinal plants used by the people of Nawalparasi District, Central Nepal. Our Nature. (2009) 7:82–99. doi: 10.3126/on.v7i1.2555
42. Chowdhary CL, Pandey DN. Distribution, availability and ethnobotany of NTFPs in Churia hills, Nepal. (2005). Available online at: Academia.edu
43. Ghimire K, Bastakoti RR. Ethnomedicinal knowledge and healthcare practices among the Tharus of Nawalparasi district in central Nepal. Forest Ecol Manag. (2009) 257:2066–72. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.039
44. Müller-Böker UEthnobotanical studies among the Chitawan Tharus. J Nepal Res Centre. (1993) 9:17–56.
45. Bhattarai KR, Acharya SK. Documentation of ethnobotanical knowledge of Tharu people on the utilization of plant resources in Gadariya and Phulwari VDCs of Kailali district, West Nepal. Bulletin Dep Plant Res. (2015) 37:41–50.
46. Manandhar NP. Traditional phytotherapy of Danuwar tribes of Kamlakhonj in Sinduli district Nepal. Fitoterapia. (1990) 50:325–31.
47. Manandher NP. Ethnobotanical census on herbal medicines of Banke district, Nepal. Contribut Nepalese Stud. (1998) 25:57–63.
48. Kurmi PP, Baral SR. Ethnomedical uses of plants from Salyan District, Nepal. Banko Jankari. (2004) 14:35–9. doi: 10.3126/banko.v14i2.17049
49. Manandhar NP. A contribution to the ethnobotany of Mushar tribes of Dhanusa district, Nepal. J Natural History Museum. (1986) 10:53–64.
50. Sah JP, Singh RL, Bhatta N. Floristic diversity and use of plants in Ghodaghodi lake area, Nepal. Journal of Natural History Museum. (2002) 21: 243–66.
51. Magar MS, Neupane S. Documentation of indigenous knowledge on medicinal use of plants by Raji Community in West Nepal. Plant Res. (2016) 3:65.
52. Mahato RB, Sharma BN. Common ethnomedicinal plants of Dhanusa district, Nepal. Plant Res. (2015) 37:51–62
53. Das BD, Paudel N, Paudel M, Khadka MK, Dhakal S, Amrit KC. Ethnobotanical knowledge of Kewrat community of Morang district, eastern Nepal. Ethnobot Res App. (2021) 21:1–11. doi: 10.32859/era.21.01.1-11
54. Chaudhary SK, Rai SK. Ethnobotany of Tharu community of Pakali, Sunsari, Nepal. Nepalese J Biosci. (2017) 7:58–71. doi: 10.3126/njbs.v7i1.41767
55. Dangol DR, Gurung SB. Ethnobotany of the Tharu tribe of Chitwan district, Nepal. Int J Pharmacog. (1991) 29:203–9. doi: 10.3109/13880209109082879
56. Acharya R, Acharya KP. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Tharu community of Parroha VDC, Rupandehi district, Nepal. Scientific World. (2009) 7:80–4. doi: 10.3126/sw.v7i7.3832
57. Uprety Y, Boon E, Poudel RC. Traditional Use of Plant Resources by Bankariya Ethnic Group in Makawanpur DIstrict, Central Nepal. Verlag: GRIN (2008).
58. Manandhar NP. Ethnobotanical notes on certain medicinal plants used by Tharus of Dang-Deokhuri Districts, Nepal. Quaternary J Crude Drug Res. (1985) 23:153–9. doi: 10.3109/13880208509069022
59. Rijal A. Living knowledge of the healing plants: Ethnophytotherapy in the Chepang communities from the Mid-Hills of Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2008) 4:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-23
60. Bhatt MD, Adhikari YP, Kunwar R. Ethnobotany of weeds in Kanchanpur District, Far-Western Nepal. Ethnoboty Res Appl. (2021) 21:1–19. doi: 10.32859/era.21.19.1-19
61. Bhattarai S, Tamang R. Medicinal and aromatic plants: a synopsis of Makawanpur District, central Nepal. Int J Indig Herbs Drugs. (2017) 3:6–15.
63. Shah DP, Singh NB. Ethnobiological Study of the Majhi of Sindhuli District. Nepalese J Zool. (2014) 2:44–50.
64. Manandhar NP. A contribution to the ethnobotany of Mushar tribes of Dhanusa district, Nepal. J Nat Hist Museum. (1986) 10:53–64.
65. Siwakoti M, Siwakoti S. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants among the Limbu of Morang district, Nepal. Ecoprint. (1998) 5:79–84.
66. Siwakoti M, Siwakoti S. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants among the Satar tribe of Nepal. J Econom Taxon Botany. (2000)24:323–33.
67. Siwakoti M, Varma SK. Medicinal plants of the Terai of eastern Nepal. J Econ Taxon Botany Add Ser. (1996) 12:423–38.
68. Dhami N. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants in western Terai of Nepal: a case study of Dekhatbhuli VDC of Kanchanpur district. In: Medicinal Plants in Nepal: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Ecological Society of Nepal, Kathmandu. (2008) pp. 164–76.
69. Bhattarai KR. Ethnobotanical survey on plants used in Mai Municipality of Ilam district, eastern Nepal. Banko Janakari. (2020) 30:11–35. doi: 10.3126/banko.v30i2.33476
70. Manandhar NP. Medicinal Plants used by Chepang tribes of Makawanpur district, Nepal. Fitoterapia. (1989) 60:61–8.
71. Manandhar NP. Ethnobotanical note on folklore remedies of Baglung district, Nepal. Contrib Nepalese Stud. (1993) 20:183–96.
72. Gautam TP. Indigenous uses of some medicinal plants in Panchthar district, Nepal. Nepalese J Biosci. (2011) 1:125–30. doi: 10.3126/njbs.v1i0.7479
73. Budha-Magar S, Bhandari P, Ghimire SK. Ethno-medicinal survey of plants used by Magar (Kham) community, Rolpa district, Western Nepal. Ethnobot Res Appl. (2020) 19:1–29. doi: 10.32859/era.19.18.1-29
74. Basnet BK, Joshi R, Lekhak HD. Ethnobotanical survey of chepang tribe of Makawanpur district, Nepal. Kathmandu: Ecological Society of Nepal (2001).
75. Tamang R, Sedai DR. Documentation of ethnomedicinal knowledge on plant resources used by baram community in Arupokhari VDC, Gorkha District. Central Nepal Bull Depart Plant Res. (2016) 38:60–4.
76. Shrestha I, Joshi N. Medicinal plants of the Lele village of Lalitpur district, Nepal. Int J Pharmacognosy. (1993) 31:130–4. doi: 10.3109/13880209309082929
77. Atreya K, Pyakurel D, Thagunna KS, Bhatta LD, Uprety Y, Chaudhary RP, et al. Factors contributing to the decline of traditional practices in communities from the gwallek–kedar area, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. Environ Manag. (2018) 61:741–55. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1009-6
78. Kunwar RM, Chowdhary CL, Bussmann RW. Diversity, utilization and management of medicinal plants in Baitadi and Darchula Districts, Far West Nepal. The Initiation. (2008) 2:157–64. doi: 10.3126/init.v2i1.2538
79. Kunwar RM, Uprety Y, Burlakoti C, Chowdhary CL, Bussmann RW. Indigenous use and ethnopharmacology of medicinal plants in far-west Nepal. Ethnobotany Res Appl. (2009) 7:5–28. doi: 10.17348/era.7.0.5-28
80. Luitel DL, Rokaya MB, Timsina B, Münzbergová Z. Medicinal plants used by the Tamang community in the Makawanpur district of central Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2014) 10:5. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-5
81. Rana S, Oli PS, Rana H.Traditional botanical knowledge (TBK) on the use of medicinal plants in Sikles area, Nepal. Asian J Plant Sci Res. (2015) 5:8–15.
82. Bhattarai K. Folk Anthelmintic Drugs of Central Nepal. International Journal Pharmacognosy. (1992) 30:145–50. doi: 10.3109/13880209209053980
84. Malla B, Chhetri RB. Indigenous Knowledge on Ethnobotanical Plants of Kavrepalanchowk district. Kathmandu University J Sci Engin Technol. (2009) 5:96–109.
85. Subba B., Srivastav C., Kandel R.C. Scientific validation of medicinal plants used by Yakkha community of Chanuwa VDC, Dhankuta, Nepal. Springerplus. (2016) 5:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1821-5
86. Manandhar NP. Medicinal plant-lore of Tamang tribe of Kabhrepalanchok district, Nepal. Econ Bot. (1991) 45:58–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02860050
87. Manandhar NP. An Inventory of Some vegetables Drugs resources of Makawanpur District, Nepal. Fitoterapia. (1995) 63:231–8.
88. Kunwar RM, Acharya RP, Chowdhary CL, Bussmann RW. Medicinal plant dynamics in indigenous medicines in farwest Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. (2015) 163:210–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.035
89. Manandhar NP. Medico Botany of Gorkha District, Nepal - An elucidation of medicinal plants. Int J Crude Drug Res. (1990) 28:17–25. doi: 10.3109/13880209009082768
90. Manandhar NP. Native phytotherapy among the Raute tribes of Dadeldhura district, Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. (1998) 60:199–206. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00150-5
91. Acharya R, Marasini D, Acharya DP. Traditional knowledge on medicinal plants used for the treatment of domestic cattle in Dhikura village of Arghakhanchi district, Nepal. Adv J Med Plant Res. (2015) 2:006–16.
92. Subedi A, Kunwar B, Choi Y, Dai Y, van Andel T, Chaudhary RP, et al. Collection and trade of wild-harvested orchids in Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2013) 9:1–−10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-64
93. Aryal KP, Poudel S, Chaudhary RP, Chettri N, Chaudhary P, Ning W, et al. Diversity and use of wild and noncultivated edible plants in the Western Himalaya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2018) 14:211. 10 doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0211-1
94. Sharma LN, Bastakoti R. Ethnobotany of Dioscorea L with emphasis on food value in Chepang communities in Dhading district, central Nepal. Botanica Orientalis. (2009) 6:12–7. doi: 10.3126/botor.v6i0.2905
95. Rai MB. Medicinal plants of Tehrathum District, Eastern Nepal. Our nature. (2003) 1:42–8. doi: 10.3126/on.v1i1.304
96. Manandhar NP. Traditional medicinal plants used by tribals of Lamjung district, Nepal. Int J Crude Drug Res. (1987), 25:236–40 doi: 10.3109/13880208709055200
97. Bhattarai KR, Måren IE, Chaudhary RP. Medicinal Plant Knowledge of the Panchase region in the Middle Hills of the Nepalese Himalayas. Banko Janakari. (2012) 21:31–9. doi: 10.3126/banko.v21i2.9127
98. Joshi K, Ranju R, Joshi AR. Indigenous knowledge and uses of medicinal plants in Macchegaun, Nepal. Indian J Trad Knowled. (2011) 10:281–6.
99. Acharya R. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants of Resunga Hill used by Magar community of Badagaun VDC, Gulmi district, Nepal. Scientific World. (2012) 10:54–65. doi: 10.3126/sw.v10i10.6863
100. Shah S, Lamichhane D, Panthi R, Nepali KB. Traditional knowledge of Tamang community on utilization of plant resources in Dhading District, Central Nepal. J Plant Res. (2018) 16:134–40.
101. Shrestha P. Research note: Contribution to the ethnobotany of the Palpa area. Contribution to the Nepalese studies. (1985) 12:63–74.
102. Poudel RC, Uprety Y. Ethnobotanical and NTFP survey in Nuwakot district, Nepal. Botanica Orientalis. (2004) 4:66–71.
103. Bhattarai KR, Khadka MK. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants from Ilam District, East Nepal. Our Nature. (2016) 14:78–91. doi: 10.3126/on.v14i1.16444
104. Ambu G, Chaudhary RP, Mariotti M, Cornara L. Traditional uses of medicinal plants by ethnic people in the Kavrepalanchok district, Central Nepal. Plants. (2020) 9:759. doi: 10.3390/plants9060759
105. Bhattarai KR. Ethnobotanical study of plants used by Thami community in Ilam District, eastern Nepal. Our Nature. (2018) 16:55–67. doi: 10.3126/on.v16i1.22123
106. Malla B, Gauchan DP, Chhetri RB. Medico-ethnobotanical investigations in Parbat district of Western Nepal. J Med Plants Res. (2014) 8:95–108. doi: 10.5897/JMPR2013.5228
107. Manandhar NP. An ethnobotanical survey of herbal drugs of Kaski District, Nepal. Fitoterapia. (1994) 65:7–13.
108. Pradhan SP, Chaudhary RP, Sigdel S, Pandey BP. Ethnobotanical knowledge of Khandadevi and Gokulganga rural municipality of Ramechhap district of Nepal. Ethnobotany Res Appl. (2020) 20:1–32. doi: 10.32859/era.20.07.1-32
109. Gubhaju MR, Gaha Y. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants in Mityal, Palpa, Nepal. J Plant Res. (2019) 17:155–62.
110. Shah S, Lamichhane D, Dhakal S. Documentation of indigenous plants used by Gurung community of Gorkha district Central Nepal. J Plant Res. (2019) 17:163–70.
111. Shah S, Lamichhane D. Documentation of indigenous knowledge on plants used by Tamang community of Kavrepalanchok district, central Nepal. J Plant Res. (2017) 15:45–51.
112. Bhattarai KR. Ethnomedicinal practices of the Lepcha community in Ilam, East Nepal. J Plant Res. (2017) 15:31–44.
113. Bohaju R, Paudyal SP. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants of Banskharkha Community Forest, Kabhrepalanchowk district, Nepal. In: Integrating Biological Resources for Prosperity, Botanical Society of Nepal. Kathmandu. Nepal Biological Society, Biratnagar and Department of Plant Resources, Kathmandu. (2021) 267–78.
114. Shrestha P. Research note: contribution to the ethnobotany of the Palpa area. Contribut Nepalease Stud. (1985) 12:63–74.
115. Dulal K, Chaudhary S, Uprety Y, Shrestha N, Shakya S, Munankarmi NN. Ethnomedicinal plants used by the local people of Changunarayan Municipality, Bhakpatur, Nepal. Ethnobotany Res App. (2022) 23:37. doi: 10.32859/era.23.37.1-27
116. Gurung LJ, Rajbhandary S, Ranjitkar S. Indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants in mid-hills of Nepal: a case study of Sikles area of Kaski district. In: Medicinal Plants in Nepal: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Ecological Society of Nepal, Kathmandu. (2008) pp. 152–63.
117. Joshi KR. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants: a case study of Sharmoi VDC, Darchula district, Nepal. In: Medicinal Plants in Nepal: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Ecological Society of Nepal, Kathmandu. (2008) pp. 177–86.
118. Panthi M, Chaudhary RP. Ethnomedicinal plant resoures of Arghakanchi district, west Nepal. Ethnobotany. (2003) 15:71–6.
119. Manandhar NP. Ethnobotany of Jumla District, Nepal. Int J Crude Drug Research. (1986) 24:81–9. doi: 10.3109/13880208609083311
120. Kunwar RM, Nepal BK, Kshhetri HB, Rai SK, Bussmann R. Ethnomedicine in Himalaya: a case study from Dolpa, Humla, Jumla and Mustang districts of Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2006) 2:27 doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-2-27
121. Ghimire K, Adhikari M, Uprety Y, Chaudhary R. Ethnomedicinal use of plants by the highland communities of Kailash Sacred Landscape, Far-west Nepal. Acad J Med Plants. (2018) 6:365–78.
122. Adhikari K, Uprety Y, Pyakurel D, Thagunna K, Bhatta LD, Chaudhary RP. Healthcare choices and use of medicinal plants: an ethnobotanical study in kanda area of Bajhang District, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. in Ethnobiology of Mountain Communities in Asia. (2021). Springer, Cham (pp. 381–407). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-55494-1_18
123. Lama YC, Ghimire SK, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y. Medicinal plants of Dolpo. Amchis' knowledge and conservation. (2001). Available online at: WWF Nepal Program, Katmandu
125. Devkota S, Chaudhary R, Werth S, Scheidegger C. Indigenous knowledge and use of lichens by the lichenophilic communities of the Nepal Himalaya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2017) 13:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0142-2
126. Kunwar RM, Mahat L, Sharma LN, Shrestha KP, Kominee H, Bussmann RW. Underutilized plant species in far west Nepal. J Mountain Sci. (2012) 9:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s11629-012-2315-8
127. Kunwar RM, Baral B, Luintel S, Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Adhikar B, et al. Ethnomedicinal landscape: distribution of used medicinal plant species in Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2022) 18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00531-x
128. Kunwar RM, Fadiman M, Cameron M, Bussmann R, Thapamaga KB, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of plant use knowledge in Baitadi and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2018) 14:40. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0242-7
129. Poudel U, Dahal U, Upadhyaya N, Chaudhari S, Dhakal S. Livestock and poultry production in Nepal and current status of vaccine development. Vaccines. (2020) 8:322. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020322
130. Teixidor-Toneu I, Jordan FM, Hawkins JA. Comparative phylogenetic methods and the cultural evolution of medicinal plant use. Nature Plants. (2018) 4:754–61. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0226-6
Keywords: animal husbandry, Cannabis sativa, cattle health, ethnomedicine, useful plants
Citation: Uprety Y, Karki S, Poudel RC and Kunwar RM (2022) Ethnoveterinary use of plants and its implication for sustainable livestock management in Nepal. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:930533. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.930533
Received: 28 April 2022; Accepted: 08 August 2022;
Published: 09 September 2022.
Edited by:
Inayat Ur Rahman, Hazara University, PakistanReviewed by:
Giuseppe Crescenzo, University of Bari Aldo Moro, ItalyClaudia Zizzadoro, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Copyright © 2022 Uprety, Karki, Poudel and Kunwar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yadav Uprety, yadavuprety@gmail.com; Ripu M. Kunwar, ripukunwar@gmail.com