Navid Ghavipanje1*
Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez2*
Mojtaba Afshin1Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini3
Alireza Aghashahi4Amir Mansour Vatankhah5- 1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
- 2Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
- 3Camel and Range Species Research Station of South Khorasan, Birjand, Iran
- 4Department of Animal and Poultry Nutrition, Animal Science Research Institute, Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Karaj, Iran
- 5Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
This study determined the effect of dietary inclusion of camelthron [Alhagi maurorum (AM)] on the performance, blood metabolites, and antioxidant status of growing camels. A total of 18 Sindhi camel calves of 9–10 months of age and 115 ± 7 kg body weight (BW) were randomly assigned to three diets (with a forage:concentrate ratio of 50:50) that were formulated by partial and total substitution of alfalfa hay with AM as follows: (1) diet without AM (control), (2) diet containing 25% of AM (AM-25), and (3) diet containing 50% of AM (AM-50) (dry matter basis) for 150 days. Dry matter intake (DMI) was recorded daily. The camels were weighed individually on days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 75, and 150. DMI was increased (p = 0.004) with AM-50 feeding followed by AM-25. Total weight gain (p = 0.048) and average daily gain (ADG) (p = 0.043) decreased with AM-50; however, no differences were observed between the AM-25 and CON groups. Feed cost per kg BW gain tended to decrease (p = 0.092) and return per kg BW gain tended to increase (p = 0.087) by AM feeding. The plasma triglycerides (TGs) (p = 0.046) and cholesterol (CHOL) (p = 0.025) concentration were reduced with AM inclusion. Additionally, the AM50-fed camels showed the lowest concentration of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p = 0.008) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p = 0.0036), followed by AM-25. The plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) was depressed (p = 0.037) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was enhanced (p = 0.016) with both the AM-25 and AM-50. Moreover, feeding the AM containing diets led to higher (p = 0.004) glutathione peroxidase (GPx) along with a tendency for superoxide dismutase (SOD) (p = 0.075) and catalase (CAT) (p = 0.094). Overall, feeding camels with AM for up to 25% of their dry matter (DM) diet positively influenced the antioxidant status without severe deleterious effects on performance.
Introduction
By 2050, the global demand for animal products is projected to increase by 60 to 70% (1). Ongoing food-feed competition, land degradation, and climate change will further generate sustainability challenges to the livestock industry, especially in developing countries, which already face food security challenges (2). In this context, a decision to rear well-adapted livestock species as well as use unconventional plants in the pastures and agrolands could be effective in meeting present and future demands for animal products in a sustainable manner (1, 2).
The dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius or one-humped camel) is one of the most important natural resources in many parts of the world, especially in arid- and semi-arid areas (3, 4); it plays a great economic and social role in these regions, where the common livestock species cannot be efficiently reared (5). Hence, camels are seen as an opportunity for sustainable livestock production (3, 4). The worldwide camel population is about 35.5 million heads, producing about 0.557 million tons of meat per year (6). Most camels in the world are usually reared on natural grazing conditions; however, the camel farming system is changing from the traditional extensive to the modern intensive systems (4–9). However, there is a lack of scientific information on the nutritional management and performance of camels as well as evaluation of dominant pasture plants grazed by camels. Moreover, the trend is to increase the use of natural feedstuffs due to consumer concerns over the safety of animal products (10). The pasture and range plants are naturally rich in bioactive molecules, which could be used as a feeding strategy to improve ruminant products quality by enhancing the antioxidant capacity and also to reduce the cost of production (10).
Alhagi maurorum (AM), also known as camelthorn, is a halophyte plant that belongs to the Fabaceae family and has been placed under the Papilionaceae subfamily (11, 12). AM is a spiny deep-rooted perennial shrub with roots that can reach six or seven feet into the ground, and it is widely distributed in Central Asia, North America, Europe, Mediterranean, East Asia, North Africa, South Africa, and Northwestern China (12, 13). This plant normally grows in dry lands associated with low rainfall and in areas with high salinity and alkalinity (12–14). AM has been known as a potential medicinal plant that is traditionally used for treating numerous diseases such as gastroenteritis, diarrhea, inflammations, and liver disorders (12, 15). Currently, pharmacological studies have confirmed that AM is rich in phenolic, alkaloid, and flavonoid compounds, which are accompanied by antioxidant, antitumor, and antineuroinflammatory effects, hepatoprotective effects, renoprotective effects, and immune regulation (12–15). It is well-established that AM extracts enhance the antioxidant status of rats (13) and possess in-vitro radical scavenging activity (12). In addition, Alghasemi et al. (16) have shown the hepatoprotective effects of AM plants in experimentally liver injury-induced rats, which were associated with lower plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and bilirubin. Although the potential of AM as a low-cost feed for replacing conventional forages in ruminant diets has been suggested (17), its nutritional value has received little attention. In previous reports (18, 19), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and nonfiber carbohydrate (NFC) contents of AM were reported to be 11.5, 49.5, 32.9, and 30.2% [dry matter (DM) basis], respectively. The results of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis (20) also revealed that AM consisted of a complex mixture of different substances, with ketones (5.2%), acid derivatives (1.8%), terpenoids (26.8%), hydrocarbons (19.3%), heterocyclics (5.2%), and aldehydes (0.2%). Saleem et al. (21) have identified the total phenolic [105.91 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g extract] and flavonoid [2.27 mg rutin equivalents (RE)/g extract] contents of AM methanolic extracts using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-MS (UHPLC-MS) analysis, which can be correlated to its more substantial antioxidant potential. Kazemi and Bezdi (18) have been shown that AM could be used up to 250 g/d in lactation ewe's diet. Also, a study reported that the AM is one of the most palatable plants for camels (19).
Despite the promising prospects of camel rearing and its effects on boosting food security, very little attention has been paid to its nutritional practices. In intensive camel production, reducing feeding costs by replacing conventional forages (i.e., alfalfa hay) with AM might guarantee the profitability of the system, due to its low cost (18, 19) and availability (17). However, until now, the effect of AM inclusion in the growing camel diet is unknown. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the possibility of replacing alfalfa hay with AM in diets fed to Sindhi growing camels and to determine the effects on growth performance, blood metabolites, and antioxidant status. We hypothesized that AM inclusion in growing camel diets will promote a favorable antioxidant profile due to its bioactive compounds along with reduced production costs without deleterious effects on performance.
Materials and Methods
Design, Animals, and Diets
This experimental study was performed following the guidelines of the Iranian Council of Animal Care (22) (protocol ID 19293). This study was carried out at the “Camel and Rangeland Research Station of South Khorasan,” located at 37.42° N and 57.31° E longitude, 1,491 m above sea level, in Birjand, Iran.
In total, 18 male 9–10-month-old Sindhi camel calves with a mean body weight (BW) of 115 ± 7 kg were randomly assigned to the three treatment diets in a completely randomized design with six animals per treatment, each kept in an individual shaded pen (3 m × 3 m) for 150 days preceded by an adaptation period of 14 days. During the adaptation period, all the camels were treated for external and internal parasites, vaccinated against enterotoxemia (Enteroprotect P 100, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran), and fed the same diet (control diet). The diets were formulated by partial and total substitution of alfalfa hay with AM and included the following: (1) control, with no AM (CON), (2) AM-25, containing 25% AM, and (3) AM-50, containing 50% AM (DM basis) (Table 1). The whole AM plant was hand harvested from the Heydarabad (Nehbandan, South Khorasan, Iran) rangelands in June (at flowering growth stage) of 2021 and then dried and stored in a dark place until used. Diets consisting of 50 forage and 50% concentrate were formulated to meet energy and protein requirements of growing camels (23, 24), which were isocaloric (contain 2.47 Mcal/kg ME) and isonitrogenous (contain 114 g/kg CP). Throughout the experiment, the total mixed ration (TMR) diets were offered ad libitum, with feeding levels designed to ensure a daily refusal margin of 10% with free access to the water. During the experiment, camels were fed individually twice daily (0800 and 1700 h), and amounts of diet fed and refusals were weighed daily to determine DM intake (DMI) by subtracting the quantity fed minus refusals multiplied by the DM content of the TMR.
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition [dry matter (DM) basis] of experimental diets.
Sample Collection and Measurements
The TMR and refusal samples were taken during the trial (on days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150) before the morning feeding and frozen at −20°C for later analysis. The camels were weighed individually before the morning feeding on days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 to determine the average daily gain (ADG). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) and feed efficiency (FI) was calculated as follows: FCR = [DMI, (kg/d)/ADG, (kg/d)]; FCR = [ADG, (kg/d)/DMI, (kg/d)]. An estimate was also made of the feeding cost per kg of body weight gain for the experimental groups. Blood samples were collected after overnight fasting through the jugular vein using tubes containing heparin lithium as an anticoagulant (Avapezeshk, Tehran, Iran) on days 0, 75, and 150. Plasma samples were obtained by centrifuging the blood tubes for 10 min at 3,000 × g and then were frozen at −20°C until analysis.
Laboratory Analysis
Samples of TMR and orts were separately pooled and grounded in a hammer mill with a 1-mm screen (Arthur Hill Thomas Corporation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) and analyzed (three replicates) for DM (930.15), CP (Kjeldahl N × 6.25, 990.03), ether extract (EE) (945.16), and ash (967.05) according to Association of official analytical collaboration (AOAC) (25). The NDF and ADF content of samples were analyzed (Fibertec 1010, Tecator, Sweden) according to Van Soest et al. (26).
The plasma samples were analyzed for glucose (Glu) (mg/dl), total protein (TP) (g/dl), creatinine (Cr) (mg/dl), albumin (Alb) (g/dl), triacylglycerol (TG) (mg/dl), cholesterol (CHOL) (mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (mg/dl), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (mg/dl), ALT (U/L), AST (U/L), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (U/L) using commercial kits (Pars Azmun Corporation Ltd., Tehran, Iran) by an autoanalyzer (BT 1,500, Biotecnica Instruments SpA, Rome, Italy) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasma total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (mmol/l) was measured using 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical formation with the commercially available Randox Kit (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, County Antrim, UK). Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) (nmol/ml) level was determined using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) according to a study by Placer et al. (27). The enzymatic activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (U/ml), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (U/ml), and catalase (CAT) (U/ml) were measured using the Randox Kit (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, County Antrim, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical Analysis
A completely randomized design with three treatments (diets) and six replicates (camels) was used for this study. All the data were statistically analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (version 9.2, SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, North Carolina, USA) (28) for repeated measures. The fixed effects in the model were: the dietary treatment (diet), the time of storage (time), and their interaction (diet × time), while camel was included as a random factor. Initial body weight and blood parameters of camels were used as covariates in the model. Least-square means (LSM) were calculated and tested for differences by Tukey's test. A polynomial contrasts analysis was employed to determine the linear and quadratic effects of AM levels. Differences in LSM were significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.10 was considered as a tendency.
Results
Growth Performance and Feeding Cost
The animal performance results are given in Table 2. DMI was increased with the inclusion of 25 and 50% (DM basis) AM to diet. The average initial BW (IBW) of the camels from each treatment had no difference (p = 0.652). The final BW (FBW) of animals fed AM diets tended to decrease (p = 0.096). The camels fed AM-25 and AM-50 had approximately 1.01 and 4.4% lower FBW compared to the CON group. Likewise, total weight gain (p = 0.048) and ADG (p = 0.043) decreased with AM-50; however, no differences were observed between the AM-25 and CON groups. In addition, higher FCR values were found in AM-50 treatment (p = 0.018). Feed cost per kg BW gain tended to decrease (p = 0.092) by the increasing inclusion levels of AM in the experimental diets. A tendency to increase (p = 0.087) in return per kg BW gain was also observed with AM-25 and AM-50 feeding.
Table 2. DM intake, growth performance, and feeding cost of growing camels fed experimental dietsA.
Blood Metabolites
No significant effects between treatments were observed regarding Glu, TP, Cr, hemoglobin (Hb), and BUN (Table 3). The TG (p = 0.046) and CHOL (p = 0.025) concentrations were lower for AM-25 and AM-50 compared with CON. The Alb levels were increased (p = 0.047) with the increasing AM inclusion in the growing camel's diet. Additionally, the AM50-fed camels showed the lowest concentration of AST (p = 0.008) and ALT (p = 0.0036), followed by AM-25. Likewise, a tendency (p = 0.008) to decrease was also observed for ALP with increasing AM inclusion to the diets.
Table 3. Liver-related blood parameters of growing camels fed experimental dietsA.
Antioxidant Status
The AM-25 and AM-50 treatments showed a 19.4 and 27.6% lower (p = 0.037; Table 4) plasma MDA content compared to CON. Moreover, the plasma TAC of growing camels was increased (p = 0.016) with increasing the AM inclusion to diets, which led by AM-50 following AM-25. Likewise, the inclusion of 25 and 50% (DM basis) AM to the diets led to higher (p = 0.004) GPx concentration. In addition, SOD (p = 0.075) and CAT (p = 0.094) concentrations were also tended to enhance by AM inclusion to the diets.
Table 4. Antioxidant status of growing camels fed experimental dietsA.
Discussion
Given the challenges facing worldwide animal agriculture, namely, limited availability of natural resources, ongoing climatic changes, and food–feed–fuel competition, particularly in the arid and semi-arid regions, which are subjected to periodical drafts and erratic patterns of rainfall, severely affecting conventional livestock production (i.e., namely cattle and sheep), camels may become an important way to enhance food and feed security (4, 7). Therefore, camels have been subjected to an increasing research interest (3); however, there is still a lack of information on their growth performance following feeding with halophyte plants, which also is a main feature of camels (16, 19). The AM has been shown to have great potential as animal feed (18, 19), but to the best of our knowledge, no investigation has been addressed AM in growing camel. In this study, we found that AM inclusion in a growing camel diet improved antioxidant status and reduced production costs without severe deleterious effects on performance.
Growth Performance
The DMI in this study is consistent with an earlier report (29) demonstrating a daily 4.36 kg DMI for growing camels aged 8 to 12 months (with an average 120 kg BW) during the 90-day feeding period. Also, it has been reported that camel DMI mainly depends on the type and availability of forages as well as their quality (19, 30). Although most camel studies have not reported DMI based on standard diets, the DMI of growing camels has been reported to be between 1.6 and 3 kg per 100 kg live weight (30, 31). Thus, the observed DMI values were within the normal range for dromedary growing camels. The inclusion of 25 and 50% AM (DM basis) to the diets resulted in 1.2 and 2.9% higher DMI compared to the CON group, respectively. Our results agree with a study by Kazemi and Bezdi (18) and Karamshahi Amjazi et al. (32) who found significantly higher DMI in ewes fed AM diets. In addition, it has been reported that there is a contraction between the type of pasture and feed behavior in dromedary camels (33), where plants with higher palatability have been associated with higher camels intake (19, 33). In line with the present data, a study (19) that aimed to investigate the nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran reported that the AM classified as the most palatable plants for these animals. Camels have been shown to prefer prickly shrubs such as AM to other species (34). AM appears to enhance DMI, which is mainly associated with the higher palatability of AM for camel as well as camel preference for the consumption of thorny plants. Consistently, it has been well-documented that camels consume more prickly plants, which is related to the inherent adaptation of this animal and its grazing behavior, which make these plants more palatable (34, 35).
It has been shown (31, 36) that the growth rate of the camel calves is higher in the early stages of growth (up to 6 months old) and then decrease with puberty. Growth performance data presented in this study are similar to results reported in the literature using dromedary camels (37). ADG in dromedary camel calves is lower than cows and limited to 500 g/day (30). Wilson (36) reported a 326 g/day weight gain for 1-year-old camels that were fed diets containing 50 forage and 50% concentrate for 175 days, which is almost consistent with the present results.
Our results indicated that the inclusion of AM up to 25% DM did not affect ADG, FCR, and FE. In contrast, camels fed the greatest AM level (up to 50% DM of diet) had a reduction in total BW gain (~12.1% compared to the CON group and 10.6% compared to inclusion with 25% AM), resulting to lower ADG and higher FCR. It is well-accepted (38, 39) that the reduction in diet digestibility negatively affects weight gain. In this study, we did not investigate the digestibility of diets. However, it is known (18, 32, 34) that AM had lower digestibility compared to alfalfa hay. Similarly, Karamshahi Amjazi et al. (32) reported that the lower digestibility of AM compared to alfalfa hay may relate to its higher NDF, ADF, and lignin content. In this regard, Kazemi and Bezdi (18) showed that replacing the dietary forage with AM resulted in decreased nutrient digestion and decreased BW change of ewes. In this study, lower ADG in animal fed AM up to 50% DM of diet is probably attributed to decrease nutrient digestion that further increases FCR. In line with this, Karamshahi Amjazi et al. (32) reported that the apparent digestibility of DM and CP was decreased with AM silage inclusion in a sheep diet. Moreover, total BW gain and ADG in AM-25 were numerically higher and this could provoke different rates of digestion, which might enhance the efficiency of energy utilization and consequently enhance growth rate (40). Analysis of feeding costs showed that inclusion of AM to diet led to a sensible reduction of the feed cost per kg BW gain (7.6 and 6.9% reduction with the inclusion of 25 and 50% AM and DM basis). Altogether, our results indicated a favorable effect of AM inclusion on the DMI of growing camels, which was probably associated with its higher palatability as well as camel preferences for consume AM. The ADG was decreased with AM-50. However, there were no differences between AM-25 and CON in regard of ADG and FCR that along with lower feed cost per kg BW gain make AM-25 rationalization in growing camel diet.
Blood Metabolites
The current values of blood parameters were in line with previously published data on fattening camels (20). The inclusion of AM in camel diets led to a reduction of TG and CHOL concentrations. In this regard, the inclusion of 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5% (DM basis) AM powder in laying hens diet reduced in plasma TG. Also, Riasi et al. (41) reported that the inclusion of halophyte plants in sheep diets reduced the plasma concentration of TG and CHOL. In support of earlier findings, it has been shown that the ethanolic extracts of AM (at a dose of 200 and 300 mg/kg) significantly reduce the level of blood CHOL and TG in diabetic Wistar rats (42). Some previous studies (15, 43) indicate that the lipid-lowering effects of AM may relate to its large number of active compounds such as alkaloid, peptidoglycan, terpenoid, amino acid, and, especially, flavonoids.
Overall, feeding of both the AM-25 and AM-50 mitigates the concentration of liver enzymes, namely, AST, ALT, and ALP, along with the increase in Alb. The activities of the aforementioned biomarkers were discussed together, as they are commonly used to study liver function (44). The reduction in AST, ALT, and ALP of the AM-containing groups implies the enhanced liver function in these camels. Consistent with our results, Kuerbanjiang et al. (45) showed that the AM significantly alleviated alcohol-induced liver injury in mice by reducing serum ALT and AST. Moreover, Alqasoumi et al. (15) have shown that the ethanolic extract of aerial parts of AM at a dose of 500 mg/kg decreased liver enzymes and increased plasma Alb in CCl4-induced liver injury in rats. In agreement with our results, it has been shown (5, 46) that using AM extract reduced the liver enzymes (AST and ALT) in mice with liver injury, which is associated with high levels of flavonoids and bioactive polysaccharides in this plant. The AM is known to reduce the gene expression of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), inhibiting the release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) as well as preventing further signal transmission and reducing the efficiency of endotoxin signal transduction, which led to hepatoprotective effects (5). In addition, previous studies (5, 15) suggested that the hepatoprotective mechanism of AM has been partly attributed to the reduction of oxidative stress and inhibition of the expression of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1). Our finding suggests that AM not only favors a plasma lipid profile, but it could also improve liver activity of growing camels.
Antioxidant Status
The dynamic balance between oxidation and antioxidant activity in the circulatory system plays a critical role in the health and productive performance of livestock (47). The rich functional compounds in nature-derived feedstuffs make them an attractive component to improve the antioxidant status of animals, thereby improving the quality of products (47–49). Currently, consumers are interested in safe and natural foods of animal origin and in some cases, they are also willing to pay a premium price for them (49). TAC reflects the cumulative effects of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants present in plasma and body fluids (47, 48), whereas MDA is generated because of lipid peroxidation that could be measured as a biomarker of oxidative stress (47). Mammalian enzymatic antioxidation against free radical damage is mainly facilitated by the activities of SOD, GPx, and CAT (47). The results obtained regarding the antioxidant status in this study are consistent with previously published data on growing camels (23). Our results demonstrated that AM had positive effects on antioxidant status, as indicated by enhanced blood TAC, GPx, SOD, and CAT activity and depressed MDA levels. In confirmation, the antioxidant activity of AM has been proved by in-vitro and in-vivo studies (13, 15). In this regard, Peluso et al. (50) reported that the treatment of diabetic rats with AM extracts improved the plasma antioxidant status by increasing the activities of SOD, GPx, and glutathione transferase (GST). Likewise, AM extract (100 mg/kg body weight) decreased plasma MDA levels in rats (51). AM is rich in biologically active phytochemicals such as phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, and polysaccharides along with different essential minerals, proteins, and lipids, which has turned it into a powerful antioxidant (13, 15). Natural plant feeds containing phenolic, flavonoid, and alkaloid substances can prevent peroxidation by scavenging free radicals or by activation of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione reductase, GPx, and SOD (49). A study (52) reported that the aqueous extract of AM was appraised by reducing MDA levels using thiobarbituric acid assay. Laghari et al. (12) demonstrated high antioxidant activity of AM plant using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging assay, which can be related to the high radical-scavenging activities of its phenolic contents. In addition, the AM antioxidant potential has been proved by measuring ABTS radical cation scavenging and DPPH scavenging (13, 14).
In line with the current findings, a study (45) using rats with alcohol-induced liver damage found that the plasma MDA concentration decreased and the activity of the antioxidant enzymes including GPx and SOD enhanced following AM extract treatment. Also, the use of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg of AM extract was associated with an increased SOD activity and decreased MDA levels in mice (53). Recently, Asghari Baghkheirati et al. (54) showed that the use of 10 and 20 g/kg of AM powder in broilers diet reduces the MDA concentration in meat.
It is well-documented that a higher intake of natural antioxidants led to improved antioxidant status through transferring of these molecules to animal tissues (10), which leads to high-value food products (e.g., meat) and contributes to the meeting customer desires over safety and quality of products (49). Hence, improved GPx, SOD, and CAT along with mitigated MDA concentration in camels receiving AM-containing diets demonstrated that it could be a useful tool against oxidative damage.
Conclusion
Overall, the results from this study showed that dietary inclusion of AM at levels of 25 or 50% DM of diet in growing camels increased DMI. The highest levels of dietary AM were associated with lower weight gain; however, the production costs were reduced by AM inclusion, and return per kg BW gain was improved. Plasma concentration of TG and CHOL was suppressed as well as hepatic enzyme including ALT, AST, and ALP, whereas antioxidant status elevated as indicated by higher TAC, GPx, SOD, and CAT. Under the conditions of this study, AM (up to 25% DM of diet) appears to have benefitted the immune system without deleterious effects on growing camel performance. For greater scientific reach, further studies should consider the use of AM focusing on rumen function and quality of animal products, such as meat.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to NG, navid.ghavipanje@birjand.ac.ir.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board of Camel and Range Species Research Station, Birjand, Iran.
Author Contributions
NG and SH: conceptualization. NG, SH, and AA: methodology. NG, AV, and EV-B-P: validation and writing—review and editing. NG: formal analysis, visualization, project administration, and writing—original draft preparation. NG and MA: investigation. NG, AA, AV, and MA: data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the Pardis Development Company of Iran for their contribution to this study and for providing the assortment of camels. We especially thank S. Khorashadi for his excellent on-farm and laboratory work. We further acknowledge the Department of Animal Science of the University of Birjand for its cooperation.
References
1. Makkar HPS. Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal. (2018) 12:1744–54. doi: 10.1017/S175173111700324X
2. Makkar HP, Ankers P. Towards sustainable animal diets: a survey-based study. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2014) 198:309–22. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.09.018
3. Zappaterra M, Menchetti L, Nanni Costa L, Padalino B. Do Camels (Camelus dromedarius) need shaded areas? a case study of the camel market in Doha. Animals. (2021) 11:480. doi: 10.3390/ani11020480
4. Zarrin M, Riveros JL, Ahmadpour A, de Almeida AM, Konuspayeva G, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, et al. Camelids: new players in the international animal production context. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2020) 52:903–13. doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-02197-2
5. Ali A, Baby B, Vijayan R. From desert to medicine: a review of camel genomics and therapeutic products. Front Genet. (2019) 10:17. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00017
6. FAO 2018. FAOSTAT. Available online at: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed May 2, 2020).
7. Tibary A, El Allali K. Dromedary camel: a model of heat resistant livestock animal. Theriogenology. (2020) 154:203–11. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.046
8. Hoter A, Rizk S, Naim HY. Cellular and molecular adaptation of Arabian camel to heat stress. Front Genet. (2019) 10:588. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00588
9. Abri MAA, Faye B. Genetic improvement in dromedary camels: challenges and opportunities. Front Genet. (2019) 10:167. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00167/full
10. Descalzo AM, Sancho AM. A review of natural antioxidants and their effects on oxidative status, odor and quality of fresh beef produced in Argentina. Meat Sci. (2008) 79:423–36. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.006
11. Khan FM. Ethno-veterinary medicinal usage of flora of greater cholistan desert (Pakistan). Pak Vet J. (2009) 29.
12. Laghari AH, Ali Memon A, Memon S, Nelofar A, Khan KM, Yasmin A. Determination of free phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity of methanolic extracts obtained from leaves and flowers of camel thorn (Alhagi maurorum). Nat Prod Res. (2012) 26:173–6. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.538846
13. Muhammad G, Hussain MA, Anwar F, Ashraf M, Gilani AH. Alhagi: a plant genus rich in bioactives for pharmaceuticals. Phytother Res. (2015) 29:1–13. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5222
14. Muhammad G, Asghar MN, Ahmad M, Kashmiri MA, Zia I. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of extracts from aerial parts of Alhagi pseudalhagi. Asian J. Chem. (2011) 23:971.
15. Wei F, Yang X, Pang K, Tang H. Traditional uses, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and quality control of alhagi sparsifolia shap: a review. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:761–811. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.761811
16. Alqasoumi SI, Al-Rehaily AJ, AlSheikh AM, Abdel-Kader MS. Evaluation of the hepatoprotective effect of Ephedra foliate, Alhagi maurorum, Capsella bursa-pastoris and Hibiscus sabdariffa against experimentally induced liver injury in rats. Nat Prod Sci. (2008) 14:95–9.
17. El Shaer HM, Attia-Ismail SA. Halophytic and salt tolerant feedstuffs in the Mediterranean basin and Arab region: an overview. Halophytic and Salt-Tolerant Feedstuffs: Imp Nutr Physiol Repro Livestock. (2015) 22–36. doi: 10.1201/b19862-4
18. Kazemi M, Bezdi KG. An investigation of the nutritional value of camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) at three growth stages and its substitution with part of the forage in Afshari ewes' diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2021) 271:114762. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114762
19. Towhidi A, Saberifar T, Dirandeh E. Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2011) 43:617–22. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9741-9
20. Samejo MQ, Memon S, Bhanger MI, Khan KM. Chemical composition of essential oils from Alhagi maurorum. Chem Nat Compd. (2012) 48:898–900. doi: 10.1007/s10600-012-0417-8
21. Saleem H, Sarfraz M, Khan KM, Anwar MA, Zengin G, Ahmad I, et al. UHPLC-MS phytochemical profiling, biological propensities and in-silico studies of Alhagi maurorum roots: a medicinal herb with multifunctional properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. (2020) 46:861–8. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2020.1762199
22. Iranian Council of Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Technology (1995).
23. Alhidary IA, Abdelrahman MM, Uallh Khan R, Harron RM. Antioxidant status and immune responses of growing camels supplemented a long-acting multi-trace minerals rumen bolus. Ital J Anim Sci. (2016) 15:343–9. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1186502
25. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Arington, VA: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (2015).
26. Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis B. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. (1991) 74:3583–97. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
27. Placer ZA, Cushman LL, Johnson BC. Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malonyl dialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Anal Biochem. (1966) 16:359–64. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(66)90167-9
28. SAS Institute. STAT User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9.2. Cary, North Carolina: StatisticalAnalysis System Institute Inc (2007).
29. Adel E M, El-Metwaly H. Effect of feed additive “Exogenous Enzymes” on growth performance of Maghraby camels. Life Sci. (2012) 9:4830–65.
30. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, Mbaga M. Potential of camel meat as a non-traditional high quality source of protein for human consumption. Anim Front. (2014) 4:13–7. doi: 10.2527/af.2014-0028
32. Karamshahi Amjazi K, Dayani O, Tahmasbi R, Khezri A. The effect of feeding Alhagi with waste date palm silage on dry matter intake, nutrients digestibility and blood parameters of sheep. Res Anim Prod. (2017) 8:103–10. doi: 10.29252/rap.8.16.103
33. Soder KJ, Rook AJ, Sanderson MA, Goslee SC. Interaction of plant species diversity on grazing behavior and performance of livestock grazing temperate region pastures. Crop Sci. (2007) 47:416–25. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0061
34. Towhidi A, Zhandi M. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and palatability of nine plant species for dromedary camels in the province of Semnan, Iran Egypt J.Biol. (2007) 9:47–52.
37. Kamoun M. Reproduction and production of Maghrabi dromedaries kept on pastures of the Mediterranean type. Etudes et Synthesrs de l‘lEMVT. (1993) 41:117–30; Actes de l‘Atelier “Peut on ameliorer les performances de reproduction des camelins” Paris, France, 10–12 September.
38. Beauchemin KA, Rode LM, Sewalt VJ. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages. Can J Anim Sci. (1995) 75:641–4. doi: 10.4141/cjas95-096
39. Moore JE, Brant MH, Kunkle WE, Hopkins DI. Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. J Anim Sci. (1999) 77:122–35. doi: 10.2527/1999.77suppl_2122x
40. Soltan Y, Abdalla Filho A, Abdalla A, Berenchtein B, Schiavinatto P, Costa C. Replacing maize with low tannin sorghum grains: lamb growth performance, microbial protein synthesis and enteric methane production. Anim Prod Sci. (2021) 61:1348–55. doi: 10.1071/AN20605
41. Riasi A, Mesgaran MD, Stern MD, Moreno MR. Chemical composition, in situ ruminal degradability and post-ruminal disappearance of dry matter and crude protein from the halophytic plants Kochia scoparia, Atriplex dimorphostegia, Suaeda arcuata and Gamanthus gamacarpus. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2008) 141:209–19. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.014
42. Nabiyouni F, Vaezi G, Malekirad AA. Hypoglycaemic and hypolipidemic activities of Alhagi camelorum in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in Wistar rats. Arch Physiol Biochem. (2019) 127:1–8. doi: 10.1080/13813455.2019.1635623
43. Srivastava B, Sharma H, Dey YN, Wanjari MM, Jadhav AD. Alhagi pseudalhagi: a review of its phyto-chemistry, pharmacology, folklore claims and Ayurvedic studies. Int J Herb Med. (2014) 2:47–51.
44. Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. (2005) 172:367–79. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040752
45. Kuerbanjiang M, Jiang ZH, Aili A, Mikeremu S, Zhang XY. Hepatoprotective effect of Alhagi sparsifolia against alcoholic liver injury in mice. Braz J Pharm Sci. (2018) 54:e17732. doi: 10.1590/s2175-97902018000317732
46. Al-Saleem MSM, Al-Wahaib LH, Abdel-Mageed WM, Gouda YG, Sayed HM. Antioxidant flavonoids from Alhagi maurorum with hepatoprotective effect. Pharmacogn Mag. (2019) 15:592.
47. Abuelo A, Hernández J, Benedito JL, Castillo C. Redox biology in transition periods of dairy cattle: role in the health of periparturient and neonatal animals. Antioxidants. (2019) 8:20. doi: 10.3390/antiox8010020
48. Sordillo LM. Nutritional strategies to optimize dairy cattle immunity. J Dairy Sci. (2016) 99:4967–82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10354
49. Tsiplakou E, Pitino R, Manuelian CL, Simoni M, Mitsiopoulou C, De Marchi M, et al. Plant feed additives as natural alternatives to the use of synthetic antioxidant vitamins in livestock animal products yield, quality, and oxidative status: a review. Antioxidants. (2021) 10:780. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050780
50. Peluso I, Palmery M, Drummen G. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in experimental models and human studies with nutraceuticals: measurement, interpretation, and significance. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2016) 2–4. doi: 10.1155/2017/3457917
51. Shaker E, Mahmoud H, Mnaa S. Anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer activity of the extract from Alhagi maurorum (camelthorn). Food Chem Toxicol. (2010) 48:2785–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.07.007
52. Neamah NF. A pharmacological evaluation of aqueous extract of Alhagi maurorum. Glob J Pharmacol. (2012) 6:41–6.
53. Liu Y, Li C, Ma HQ, Sun TT, Wang CL, Li Y. Study on the antioxidant activity of crude polysaccharides from Alhagi sparsifolia shap. stembranch vivo. China Pharm. (2021) 24:354–8.
54. Asghari Baghkheirati A, Jebelli Javan A, Naeimi S, Ghazvinian K. Usability evaluation of camel thorn (Alhagi maurorum) in broiler diet and its effects on lipid and protein oxidation of broiler breast filets during frozen storage. Iran J Vet Res. (2021) 15:335–45. doi: 10.22059/ijvm.2020.308504.1005122
Keywords: Alhagi maurorum, antioxidants, blood metabolites, growth performance, Sindhi camel
Citation: Ghavipanje N, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Afshin M, Hosseini SA, Aghashahi A and Vatankhah AM (2022) The Inclusion of Alhagi maurorum in Growing Camel Diet: Effect on Performance, Liver-Related Blood Metabolites, and Antioxidant Status. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:863121. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.863121
Received: 26 January 2022; Accepted: 02 March 2022;
Published: 31 March 2022.
Edited by:
Anusorn Cherdthong, Khon Kaen University, ThailandReviewed by:
Chalermpon Yuangklang, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, ThailandChanadol Supapong, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, Thailand
Yosra Ahmed Soltan, Alexandria University, Egypt
Copyright © 2022 Ghavipanje, Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Afshin, Hosseini, Aghashahi and Vatankhah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Navid Ghavipanje, navid.ghavipanje@birjand.ac.ir; Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez, evargasb@sund.ku.dk