Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 28 November 2022
Sec. Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1050451
This article is part of the Research Topic Mechanical Ventilation in Anesthesia and Critical Care Animal Patients, Volume II View all 5 articles

Corrigendum: Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in dogs: A randomized clinical trial

This article is a correction to:

  1. Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    1. Read original article
\nRenata R. Rodrigues Renata R. Rodrigues*Aline M. AmbrsioAline M. AmbrósioAline M. EngbruchAline M. EngbruchLucas A. GonalvesLucas A. GonçalvesPaula A. VillelaPaula A. VillelaAna F. SanchezAna F. SanchezDenise T. FantoniDenise T. Fantoni
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

A corrigendum on
Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in dogs: A randomized clinical trial

by Rodrigues, R. R., Ambrósio, A. M., Engbruch, A. M., Gonçalves, L. A., Villela, P. A., Sanchez, A. F., and Fantoni, D. T. (2022). Front. Vet. Sci. 9:842613. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.842613

In the published article, there was a typing error in the data of P(A−a)O2 in Table 2. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Blood gas measurements during 5–25 min of recovery from isoflurane-anesthetized dogs mechanically ventilated with tidal volume of 8 mL kg−1 submitted to recruitment maneuver (ARM group, n = 11) or without recruitment maneuver (PEEP group, n = 10) and use of 5 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: mechanical ventilation, low tidal volume, alveolar recruitment maneuver, positive end-expiratory pressure, gas exchange, ventilatory mechanics, hemodynamics, dogs

Citation: Rodrigues RR, Ambrósio AM, Engbruch AM, Gonçalves LA, Villela PA, Sanchez AF and Fantoni DT (2022) Corrigendum: Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in dogs: A randomized clinical trial. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1050451. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1050451

Received: 21 September 2022; Accepted: 15 November 2022;
Published: 28 November 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Steven Epstein, University of California, Davis, United States

Copyright © 2022 Rodrigues, Ambrósio, Engbruch, Gonçalves, Villela, Sanchez and Fantoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Renata R. Rodrigues, renataramos.veterinaria@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.