Enzyme-Treated Soybean Meal Replacing Extruded Full-Fat Soybean Affects Nitrogen Digestibility, Cecal Fermentation Characteristics and Bacterial Community of Newly Weaned Piglets

The study investigated the impact of soybean protein from different processing on the performance, dietary nitrogen digestibility, cecal fermentation characteristics, and bacterial community in newly weaned piglets. The piglets were allocated to two dietary treatment and fed with the extruded full-fat soybean diet (EFS group) and enzyme-treated soybean meal diet (ESBM group), respectively. The piglets in ESBM group showed greater nitrogen digestibility and feed efficiency, and lower diarrhea rate in comparison to piglets in EFS group (P < 0.05). Cecal samples from piglets in ESBM group contained greater concentration of acetate, propionate and total SCFAs (P < 0.05), and lower contents of isobutyrate, isovalerate, total BCFAs, NH₃-N and putrescine (P < 0.05) than cecal samples from piglets in the EFS group. The cecal samples from piglets in ESBM group contained greater abundances of g_Blautia, g_Coprococcus_3, g_Fusicatenibacter, and g_Bifidobacterium than the cecal sample from piglets in the EFS group, which could promote to protect intestinal health. In summary, enzyme-treated soybean meal may enhance the growth performance of weaned piglets via increasing the dietary nitrogen digestibility, preventing protein fermentation in the hindgut, which shed light on the mechanism in regulating gut health of dietary protein.

Introduction

In the pig industry, piglets often suffer from weaning stress, including symptoms such as diarrhea, anorexia, and growth retardation due to immature digestive tract and the change of diets. The reduction of protein fermentation in the large intestine alleviates weaning stress and prevents diarrhea, which is usually achieved by feeding low-protein diets and improving the ileal digestibility of protein (1–3). Soybean is the most widely used protein source in the diets of pigs, but it contains soybean antigens and many other anti-nutritional factors, such as glycinin, β-conglycinin, and trypsin inhibitor, that caused allergic reactions or inhibited the activity of digestive enzymes, thus reducing nutrient digestibility and growth performance of livestock (4, 5). Therefore, improving the utilization of soybean protein in a low-protein diet could have a positive impact on the growth and health for the newly weaned piglets.

Extruded full-fat soybean (EFS) is the soybean treated with extrusion and a common soybean protein source, containing lower toxin, urease, and trypsin inhibitor activity, therefore can improve nutrient digestion and utilization (6). EFS in the diet has been reported to improve growth performance of weaned piglets by increasing the apparent total tract digestibility of crude protein and organic matter, and reducing the rate of diarrhea (7). Enzyme-treated soybean meal (ESBM) is a new type of protein source in piglet diets, which is hydrolyzed from soybean meal by biological enzymes. Compared with soybean meal, ESBM contains higher crude protein, amino acid and small peptide content, and lower anti-nutritional factor content, therefore it has great potential to improve the gut health of weaned piglets (8). Correspondingly, our previous studies have shown that ESBM improved the growth performance, antioxidant index and immune function of weaned piglets (9).

Given that there are only few studies aiming to evaluate the nutritional value of different processed soybean protein in newly weaned piglets, the current study aimed to compare the effects of dietary ESBM and EFS on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota, and its fermentation characteristics based on a low-protein and AA supplemented diets.

Methods and Materials

The animal handling and all procedures of this study received approval from the Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of the Hunan Agricultural University (Changsha).

The ESBM used in this experiment was provided by Hamlet Protein Company (Horsens, Denmark). The EFS used in this experiment was provided by Hunan Lifeng Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). Table 1 shows the anti-nutrient factors and nutrient composition of EFS and ESBM.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Anti-nutrient factors and nutrient composition in extruded and enzyme-treated soybean meal (%, as-fed basis)^*.

Animals and Dietary Treatments

Thirty-two Duorc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) growing barrows were allotted to 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design with 16 repetitions per treatment according to their body weight (BW, 7.91 ± 0.58 kg). The dietary treatments include EFS diet and ESBM diet: the EFS diet was formulated by adding 24% EFS, while the ESBM diet was formulated by adding 12% EFS and 7% ESBM, and corn and soybean oil was increased to balance the energy and protein levels (Table 2). The experimental diets and vitamin-mineral premix were configured to meet the nutritional needs of nursery piglet as recommended by the NRC (10). Chromic oxide was included in all diets at 0.25% as an indigestible marker in the two diets. The experimental period lasted for 7 days. The house, feed trough and drinker were thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before starting the experiment. The temperature of the pig house was kept at 24–28°C, and the relative humidity was controlled at 60–70%. All the pigs were provided ad libitum access to water and feed. A scoring system was applied to indicate the presence and severity of diarrhea as following: 1 = hard feces; 2 = slightly soft feces; 3 = soft, partially formed feces; 4 = loose, semiliquid feces; and 5 =watery, mucous-like feces.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Ingredients composition and nutrient levels of the experimental diets (%, as-fed basis).

Sample Collection and Processing

The daily feed intake and body weight (BW) of each pig were recorded on the d 0 and d 7 to calculate the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion rate (ADG: ADFI, G: F). Six piglets per treatment were humanely killed by intramuscular injection of serazine hydrochloride (Jilin Huamu Animal Health Product Co., Ltd., Changchun, China) at a dosage of 0.5 mL/kg BW on d 7. Pigs were dissected along the belly line, then the ileum and cecum segments were isolated to collect the digesta samples. Cecal digesta samples were stored at −80°C for microbiome and metabolite analysis and ileal digesta samples were stored at −20°C for subsequent chemical composition analysis to calculate nutrient digestibility.

The feed samples and ileal digesta after freeze-drying were weighed in parallel samples for analysis and determination. Dry matter (DM, AOAC 930.15) and CP (AOAC 984.13) contents were determined following the AOAC (11) procedures. The amino acid (AA) profiles were detected by HPLC (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, USA). Lysine and threonine were detected after hydrolyzing with 6 mol/L HCl at 105°C for 24 h. Methionine was analyzed as methionine sulfone after cold performic acid oxidation overnight before hydrolysis. Tryptophan was determined after hydrolyzing with 4 mol/L LiOH at 110°C for 20 h. The apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of amino acids and nitrogen were calculated using the following formula:

$\begin{array}{ll}\begin{array}{l}\text{AID of diet component}=[(\text{Diet component/Chromium})\text{ d}\hfill \\ -(\text{Diet component/Chromium})\text{ i}]\hfill \\ \ast 1/(Dietcomponent/Chromium)d.\hfill \end{array}& (1)\end{array}$

Where (Diet component/Chromium) d= ratio of diet component to Chromium in the diet and (Diet component/ Chromium) i = ratio of diet component to Chromium in the ileal digesta (12).

Analysis for Bacterial Microbiota by 16S rDNA

Total genomic DNA of 10 digesta samples were extracted using a Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity and quality of extracted DNAs were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. One sample from each treatment group was abandoned after DNA extraction failed. The genes of bacteria 16S ribosomal RNA in the region of V4–V5 were amplified by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers (515F 5′-barcode- GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG-3′) and (907R 5′-120CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3′). Electrophoresis was applied to analyze the integrity of PCR amplicons by using a Tapestation Instruction (Agilent technologies, USA). AxyPrep DNA Gel 122Extraction Kit was chosen to extract and purify PCR amplicons using 2% agarose gels (Axygen 123Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and then the production was quantified using QuantiFluor™ -ST and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq system. QIIME software was used to demultiplex and quality-filtered raw Illumina fastq files. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined as a similarity threshold of 0.97 using UPARSE. Then UCHIME was applied to identify and delete the unnormal gene sequences. RDP database (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) was also referenced to take the taxonomy-based analysis for OTUs using RDP classifier at a 90% confidence level. The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: NCBI SRA database (sequence number: PRJNA720093).

Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (pICRUSt) Analysis for Predicted Metabolic Functions of Microbial Communities

The result of 16S rRNA gene sequencing was applied by PICRUSt analysis to predict metabolic functions of the bacterial community in the cecal samples of piglets. The resultant OTU table was then used to predict metabolic functions by referencing the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) orthology (KO) database.

Analysis of Cecal Fermentation Characteristics

The concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) including short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) in digesta were analyzed using a gas chromatographic method. Briefly, ~1.0 g of feces were first homogenized in the 1.5 mL deionized water. After centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min, supernatants (1 mL of each) were acidified with 25% metaphosphoric acid at a 1: 5 ratio (1 volume of acid for 5 volumes of sample) for 30 min on ice. The sample was injected into a GC 2010 series gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a CP-Wax 52 CB column 30.0 m × 0.53 mm i.d (Chrompack, Netherlands). The injector and detector temperatures were 75 and 280°C, respectively. All procedures were performed in triplicate and total VFAs were determined as the sum of analyzed SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate) and BCFAs (isobutyrate and isovalerate).

The fresh cecal digesta samples were collected on d 7 for the analysis of the NH₃-N and biogenic amine contents, including Putrescine (PUT), cadaverin (CAD), spermine (SPD), and spermidine (SPM). The NH₃-N was measured by colorimetry according to the manufacturer's instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Jiangsu, China). The biogenic amine was measured using HPLC as the main instrument. Weigh about 0.5 g of samples, add pre-cooled 5% perchloric acid, and homogenize for 300 s. Then ultrasonic extraction in a low temperature water bath for 1 h. Centrifuge at 5,000 r/min for 10 min, remove 0.5 ml of supernatant to a 15 ml centrifuge tube. Then, add 1 mL NaOH solution and 20 μl benzoyl chloride, vortex for 30 s in a liquid mixer, place in a 37°Cwater bath for 20 min, and vortex for 30 s every 5 min. After the derivatization is completed, add 2 ml saturated sodium chloride solution, 2 ml anhydrous ether, shake and mix, pipette the supernatant liquid, use nitrogen to blow it to dryness, add 1 ml methanol (HPLC grade) to dissolve, and pass the 0.22 μm filter membrane before the measurement. The test conditions were as following: wavelength: 254 nm; flow rate: 1 ml/min; column temperature: elution at 40°C; Acetonitrile: 0.02 mol/L; Ammonium formate = 30:70 (V: V).

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by the GLM procedure of SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and each piglet was regarded as a statistical unit. Data are showed as Mean values + standard error of the total mean (SEM). For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered as significant difference, while 0.05 < P <0.10 as a tendency.

Results

Growth Performance

No differences were observed in final BW and ADFI between the two dietary treatments (Table 3). Compared to the EFS diet, ESBM increased the G/F (P < 0.05) and tended to improve the ADG of piglets (0.05 < P < 0.10). The ESBM diet also decreased the diarrhea incidence throughout the trial period compared to EFS (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Effects of protein source on performance of weaned pigs.

Nitrogen Digestibility

As shown in Table 4, the ESBM diet had higher AID of total nitrogen especially Histidine and Tryptophan compared to EFS diet (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in AID of the other essential amino acids or the non-essential amino acid between two diets (P > 0.05).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Effects of protein source on apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen of weaned pigs (%).

Fermentation Characteristics

As shown at Table 5, piglets in the ESBM group had higher concentrations of total SCFA, acetate and propionate than in the EFS group (P < 0.05). And the concentrations of total BCFA, isobutyrate and isovalerate showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the ESBM group compared with the EFS group. As shown at Table 6, there were higher concentrations of NH₃-N and putrescine in the EFS group than ESBM group (P < 0.05).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Effects of protein source on volatile fatty acid composition in cecal digesta of weaned pigs (mg/g digesta).

TABLE 6

Table 6. Effects of protein source on NH₃-N and biogenic amine contents in cecal digesta of weaned pigs (μg /g digesta).

Bacterial Community Richness and Biodiversity

The OTUs of the cecal digesta from EFS group and ESBM group were 597 and 567, respectively, wherein 410 common OTUs have been identified (Figure 1C). The α-diversity of microbiota including Shannon index and Chao index were presented in Figures 1A,B. The ESBM diet induced higher Shannon index than the EFS (P < 0.05) whereas no difference was shown in Chao index between the two dietary treatments (P < 0.10). The β-diversity of bacterial community between EFS and ESBM was presented with PCoA, showing a different clustering of microbial communities (Figure 1D).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Effects of protein source on the cecal microbes at the OTU (A), β-diversity (B) and α-diversity indexes including Shannon index (C) and Chao index (D) in piglets. The individual minipig was regarded as the experimental unit, n = 5 for EFS, n = 5 for ESBM. EFS, extruded full-fat soybean; ESBM, enzyme-treated soybean meal. *P < 0.05.

At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant bacteria and their relative abundance accounted for about 95%. However, there was no difference in microbiota at the phylum level between the two treatment groups (Figure 2A, Supplementary Table 1). A total of 17 families were detected in two dietary treatments, wherein ESBM increased the relative abundance of f_Lachnospiraceae and f_unclassified_p_Firmicutes but decreased the relative abundance of f_Rikenellaceae compared to the EFS diet (Figure 2B, Supplementary Table 2, P < 0.05).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Effects of protein source on the cecal microbial composition at the phylum level (A) and the family level (B) (at least one sample relative abundance ≥0.1%) in piglets (%). The individual minipig was regarded as the experimental unit, n = 5 for EFS, n = 5 for ESBM. EFS, extruded full-fat soybean; ESBM, enzyme-treated soybean meal.

The lefse analysis was used to identify the significantly different bacteria between the two treatment groups at the genus level. A total of 19 genera were identified to be significantly different between the two groups, including 11 genera from EFS and 8 genera from ESBM, respectively (Figure 3). The relative abundance of g_Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005, g_Pseudomonas, g_unclassified_c_Bacteroidia g_Lachnoclostridium, g_unclassified_f_Ruminococcaceae, g_Romboutsia, g_Family_XIII_AD3011_group, g_Ruminiclostridium, g_Terrisporobacter, g_Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, and g_Turicibacter were increased in piglets fed with the EFS diet, whereas the relative abundance of g_Blautia, g_unclassified_p_Firmicutes, g_Coprococcus_3, g_Fusicatenibacter, g_Anaeroplasma, g_Bifidobacterium, g_Candidatus_Saccharimonas, and g_Acetatifactor were increased in piglets fed with the ESBM diet.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Identification of the most differentially abundant genera in cecum of the two dietary treatments. The plot was generated from Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis with CSS-normalized OTU table and displays taxa with LDA scores above 2.5 and P-values below 0.05. Genera enriched in the samples with EFS diet are indicated with red bars, and genera enriched in the samples with ESBM diet are indicated with blue bars. The individual minipig was regarded as the experimental unit, n = 5 for EFS, n = 5 for ESBM. EFS, extruded full-fat soybean; ESBM, enzyme-treated soybean meal.

Predicted Functional Profiles of Microbial Communities Using PICRUSt

To predict the potential function of gut bacteria on nutrient metabolism or health in piglets after feeding EFS or ESBM diets, KEGG pathways were analyzed by the PICRUSt program. A total of 285 KEGG pathways were identified and the top 50 were shown at Supplementary Figure 1. Eight pathways related to amino acid metabolism were enhanced in the ESBM group, including aromatic AA (phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan) biosynthesis, branched chain AA (valine, leucine and isoleucine) biosynthesis, lysine biosynthesis, arginine biosynthesis, metabolism of glycine-serine-threonine, arginine and proline metabolism, d-arginine and d-ornithine metabolism, and cyanoamino acid metabolism (Figure 4). In the ESBM group, seven pathways related to cofactors and vitamins metabolism including folate biosynthesis, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, thiamine metabolism, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, biotin metabolism, nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, and riboflavin metabolism were increased (Figure 5).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Prediction on amino acid metabolism of bacterial communities using the PICRUSt program. The individual minipig was regarded as the experimental unit, n = 5 for EFS, n = 5 for ESBM. EFS, extruded full-fat soybean; ESBM, enzyme-treated soybean meal. *P < 0.05; ^#P < 0.10.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Prediction on vitamins and coenzymes metabolism of bacterial communities using the PICRUSt program. The individual minipig was regarded as the experimental unit, n = 5 for EFS, n = 5 for ESBM. EFS, extruded full-fat soybean; ESBM, enzyme-treated soybean meal. *P < 0.05.

Discussion

In the current study, the nutritional value was evaluated for soybean protein after two different processed treatments in the newly weaned piglets. Among them, the AID of crude protein in EFS and ESBM diets were 74.52 and 77.57%, respectively, which were close to the findings of previous studies (6, 9, 13). The improved crude protein digestibility of the ESBM diet could be partly explained by the lower ANFs content especially Glycinin and β-conglycinin than the EFS diet. In addition, enzyme treatment to the soybean may increase the content of small peptides, making it easy to be absorbed, which is also beneficial for improving digestibility (9). Therefore, ESBM diet significantly increased the AID of crude protein and several amino acids compared with EFS diets, which contributed to the improved the utilization of nitrogen in piglets, thereby increased the growth performance of piglets.

More importantly, the reduction in the incidence of diarrhea means that the weaning stress of piglets in the ESBM group has been better alleviated compared with the EFS group. It should be noted that reducing the protein fermentation in the hindgut can help alleviate the weaning stress of piglets (14, 15). Proteins easier to be digested tend to have better digestibility in the small intestine, which reduces the amount of protein flowing into the large intestine (16, 17). In this study, a higher AID of crude protein of the ESBM diet indicated less protein entered the hindgut and used for fermentation than the EFS diet.

Moreover, ESBM diet showed better cecal fermentation characteristics than EFS diet. The protein fermentation metabolites in the hindgut are amines, SCFAs and BCFAs wherein amines must be converted from nitrogen-containing groups, while BCFAs are only produced from the fermentation of three branched chain amino acids, leucine, isoleucine and valine (17, 18). Therefore, the concentration of amines and BCFAs could reflect the fermentation of proteins in the hindgut (18). The concentration of BCFAs, NH₃-N and biogenic amine were lower in the ESBM group than in the EFS group, suggesting that the protein fermentation in the hindgut of the ESBM group was relatively alleviated. Notably, the ESBM group also had a higher concentration of SCFAs than the EFS group. SCFAs in the large intestine are mainly derived from the fermentation of dietary fiber, the component of plant cell wall (19). A previous study has reported that the main fermentation site of higher molecular weight insoluble non-starch polysaccharides is in the colon, while lower molecular weight anti-digestible oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides are fermented in the back of the small intestine and cecum (20). Enzyme treatment may damage the structure of the cell wall in a higher extent compared to extrusion, so the macromolecular non-starch polysaccharides were preliminarily degraded into more fermentable polysaccharides with lower polymerization degree, inducing increased SCFA production in pigs fed with the ESBM diet (21). This was further supported by the changes in NDF and ADF contents between ESBM and EFS.

The interaction and connection between diet, gut microbe and host have received increasing attention. As the main nitrogen source of the intestinal microbe, dietary protein has been proven to significantly change the bacterial community. Wang et al. reported that low protein diets improved hindgut health by preventing the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria (22). A better digestible protein source also reduced the risk of colitis under the same protein level (23, 24). In this experiment, f_Lachnospiraceae is the dominant family of bacteria in the cecum of piglets, second only to f_Lactobacillaceae. The relative abundance of f_Lachnospiraceae in the cecum of piglets was significantly increased with the ESBM diet and closely related to intestinal health (25). Moreover, g_Blautia belonging to f_Lachnospiraceae was the dominant genus second only to g_Lactobacillus in the cecum of piglets and significantly increased in the ESBM group, which could help clear gas in the intestinal lumen and relieve enteritis (26). Similarly, the relative abundance of g_Fusicatenibacter (a genus from f_Lachnospiraceae) in the piglet fed with the ESBM diet was also significantly higher than those fed EFS diet and has been found to be negatively related to human colitis and can relieve colitis in mice (27). Another child taxon of f_Lachnospiraceae, the g_Coprococcus_3 was highly enriched in the ESBM group. Since g_Coprococcus is one of the common acetic acid and butyric acid producing bacteria, the higher relative abundance of g_Coprococcus could correspond with the change of butyrate production (28). In correspondence with the current study, Zhou et al. (14) reported that low-protein diets reduced protein flow into the hindgut and increased the relative abundance of g_Coprococcus in a pig model. However, g_Lachnoclostridium from the family f_Lachnospiraceae was found to increase in the EFS group, and it could be attributed to the shedding of intestinal epithelial cells (29).

Except to f_Lachnospiraceae, the change of other different bacteria related to intestinal health cannot be ignored. For instance, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium has also increased significantly in the cecum of ESBM feeding piglets, which in most cases was recognized as beneficial for the gut health (30). Additionally, compared with the ESBM group, the EFS group had a higher relative abundance of f_Rikenellaceae, which was reported to positively correlate with the inflammation-mediated factors of colonic epithelial cells, including IL-6 and inflammatory chemokines in mice (31). However, it was worth mentioning that EFS also increased the relative abundance of specific beneficial bacteria such as g_Terrisporobacter related to immune enhancement and g_Ruminiclostridium related to improved intestinal barrier function, indicating that EFS also had the potentiality to improve intestinal health (32, 33). Taken together, ESBM may have higher potentiality to improve the intestinal health of piglets than EFS, as inferred from the improved microbial profile and higher protein digestibility.

Microbiota in the hindgut influence the growth and health of the host by regulating the metabolism of nutrients and energy (34). To predict the potential function of gut bacteria on nutrient metabolism or health in piglets after feeding EFS or ESBM diets, KEGG pathways were analyzed by the PICRUSt program. Our results indicated that the functional differences existed in aspects of amino acid synthesis, coenzyme and vitamin metabolism between two dietary group. Zhao et al. (19) reported that dietary fiber regulated energy metabolism of piglets by affecting butyrate producing bacteria. Similarly, PICRUSt analysis revealed the metabolic pathways such as carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism were overrepresented in all-grass-fed geese (35). Our results were similar to previous studies in that dietary protein altered the function of intestinal microbiota. However, given the fact that the functional prediction based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing does not fully reflect the functional characteristics of the bacterial community compared with the metagenome, therefore, it should be noted that the results of our functional prediction have limited reference value.

In conclusion, ESBM had higher protein ileal digestibility than EFS, which not only resulted in improved nitrogen utilization, but also inhibited protein fermentation in the hindgut of weaned piglets. Importantly, the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria (mainly f_Lachnospiraceae, including g_Blautia, g_Fusicatenibacter, and Coprococcus_3) were increased and some pathogenic bacteria (g_Lachnoclostridium and f_Rikenellaceae) was reduced in the cecum of piglets fed with ESBM diet, which may contribute to the improvement of intestinal health and attenuation of weaning stress of piglets. Therefore, our results supported the hypothesis that ESBM can be a better protein source than EFS for the application in weaned piglet diets.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the (NCBI SRA) repository, accession number (PRJNA720093).

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of the China Agricultural University (Beijing).

Author Contributions

HL and XM: conceptualization, methodology, and software. ZL: literature collection. HL and JY: writing-original draft preparation. QJ, JC, and XH: writing-reviewing and editing. BT and XM: funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (19B267) and the Youth Science Foundation Project of Hunan Agricultural University (19QN01).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.639039/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Nyachoti CM, Omogbenigun FO, Rademacher M, Blank G. Performance responses and indicators of gastrointestinal health in early-weaned pigs fed low-protein amino acid-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci. (2006) 84:125–34. doi: 10.2527/2006.841125x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zhou H, Chen D, Mao X, He J, Yu J, Zheng P, et al. Evaluation of standardized ileal digestible lysine requirement for 8-20 kg pigs fed low crude protein diets. Anim Sci J. (2019) 90:237–46. doi: 10.1111/asj.13142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shao D, Shen Y, Zhao X, Wang Q, Hu Y, Shi S, et al. Low-protein diets with balanced amino acids reduce nitrogen excretion and foot pad dermatitis without affecting the growth performance and meat quality of free-range yellow broilers. Ital J Anim Sci. (2018) 17:698–705. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1400414

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Iwashita Y, Yamamoto T, Furuita H, Sugita T, Suzuki N. Influence of certain soybean antinutritional factors supplemented to a casein-based semipurified diet on intestinal and liver morphology in fingerling rainbow troutoncorhynchus mykiss. Fisher Sci. (2008) 74:1075–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01627.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Cong G, Zhang Y, Shi S. Effects of soy protein concentrate in starter phase diet on growth performance, blood biochemical indices, carcass traits, immune organ indices and meat quality of broilers. Animals. (2021) 11:281. doi: 10.3390/ani11020281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zarkadas LN, Wiseman J. Influence of processing of full fat soya beans included in diets for piglets. I. Performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2005) 118:109–19. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.09.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Piao XS, Kim JH, Jin J, Kim JD, Cho WT, Shin IS, et al. Effects of extruded full fat soybean in early-weaned piglets. Asian Austral J Anim Sci. (2000) 13:645–52. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2000.645

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhou SF, Sun ZW, Ma LZ, Yu JY, Ma CS, Ru YJ. Effect of feeding enzymolytic soybean meal on performance, digestion and immunity of weaned pigs. Asian Austral J Anim Sci. (2011) 24:103–9. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.10205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ma X, Shang Q, Wang Q, Hu J, Piao X. Comparative effects of enzymolytic soybean meal and antibiotics in diets on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, immunity, and intestinal barrier function in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2019) 248:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.12.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Urriola A, Bártoli F, Labala J, Ledur YV. Uso de las tablas y modelo animal del NRC 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. (2014).

Google Scholar

11. AOAC. AOAC Official Method 990.03, Protein (crude) in Animal Feed, Combustion Method. (2006).

12. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Wester TJ, Ravindran G, Thomas DV. Influence of feed form and conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broiler starters fed wheat-based diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2011) 168:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cervantes-Pahm SK, Stein HH. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in conventional, fermented, and enzyme-treated soybean meal and in soy protein isolate, fish meal, and casein fed to weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. (2010) 88:2674–83. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zhou L, Fang L, Sun Y, Su Y, Zhu W. Effects of the dietary protein level on the microbial composition and metabolomic profile in the hindgut of the pig. Anaerobe. (2016) 38:61–9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Almeida VV, Nuñez AJC, Schinckel AP, Alvarenga PVA, Castelini FR, Silva-Guillen YV, et al. Interactive effect of dietary protein and dried citrus pulp levels on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, and hindgut fermentation of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. (2017) 95:257–69. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Qaisrani SN, Moquet PCA, Van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, Verstegen MWA, Hendriks WH. Protein source and dietary structure influence growth performance, gut morphology, and hindgut fermentation characteristics in broilers. Poultry Sci. (2014) 93:3053–64. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Seradj AR, Balcells J, Morazan H, Alvarez-Rodriguez J, Babot D, Fuente GD. The impact of reducing dietary crude protein and increasing total dietary fiber on hindgut fermentation, the methanogen community and gas emission in growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2018) 245:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.09.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jha R, Berrocoso JFD. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2016) 212:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.12.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhao J, Liu P, Wu Y, Guo P, Liu L, Ma N, et al. Dietary fiber increases butyrate-producing bacteria and improves the growth performance of weaned piglets. J Agric Food Chem. (2018) 66:7995–8004. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jaworski NW, Stein HH. Disappearance of nutrients and energy in the stomach and small intestine, cecum, and colon of pigs fed corn-soybean meal diets containing distillers dried grains with solubles, wheat middlings, or soybean hulls. J Anim Sci. (2017) 95:727. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Liu Q, Zhang WM, Zhang ZJ, Zhang YJ, Zhang YW, Chen L, et al. Effect of fiber source and enzyme addition on the apparent digestibility of nutrients and physicochemical properties of digesta in cannulated growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2016) 216:262–72. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.04.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang H, Shen J, Pi Y, Gao K, Zhu W. Low-protein diets supplemented with casein hydrolysate favor the microbiota and enhance the mucosal humoral immunity in the colon of pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2019) 10:79. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0387-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Vidal-Lletjos S, Beaumont M, Tome D, Benamouzig R, Blachier F, Lan A. Dietary protein and amino acid supplementation in inflammatory bowel disease course: what impact on the colonic mucosa? Nutrients. (2017) 9:310. doi: 10.3390/nu9030310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sattari Najafabadi Z, Skau Nielsen T, Skou Hedemann. M. Dietary protein source and butyrylated high-amylose maize starch included in a high-protein diet determines the urinary metabolome of rats. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2018) 70:255–66. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2018.1499711

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhang L, Wu W, Lee YK, Xie J, Zhang H. Spatial heterogeneity and co-occurrence of mucosal and luminal microbiome across swine intestinal tract. Front Microbiol. (2018) 9:48. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Benitez-Paez A, Gomez DPE, Lopez-Almela I, Moya-Perez A, Codoner-Franch P, Sanz Y. Depletion of Blautia species in the microbiota of obese children relates to intestinal inflammation and metabolic phenotype worsening. Msystems. (2020) 5:e00857–19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00857-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Takeshita K, Mizuno S, Mikami Y, Sujino T, Saigusa K, Matsuoka K, et al. A single species of clostridium subcluster xiva decreased in ulcerative colitis patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2016) 22:2802–10. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Lobley GE, Calder AG, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Contribution of acetate to butyrate formation by human faecal bacteria. Br J Nutr. (2004) 91:915–23. doi: 10.1079/BJN20041150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hughes KR, Schofield Z, Dalby MJ, Caim S, Chalklen L, Bernuzzi F, et al. The early life microbiota protects neonatal mice from pathological small intestinal epithelial cell shedding. FASEB J. (2020) 34:7075–88. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000042R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, Ferrario C, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, et al. Bifidobacteria and the infant gut: an example of co-evolution and natural selection. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2018) 75:103–18. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2672-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Park SJ, Kim JH, Song MY, Sung YC, Lee SW, Park Y. Pd-1 deficiency protects experimental colitis via alteration of gut microbiota. BMB Rep. (2017) 50:578–83. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.11.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lin C, Wei Z, Yi Z, Tingting T, Lichun F. Analysis of the effects of nanosilver on bacterial community in the intestinal fluid of silkworms using high-throughput sequencing. Bull Entomol Res. (2019) 110:1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0007485319000634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wang P, Li D, Ke W, Liang D, Hu X, Chen F. Resveratrol-induced gut microbiota reduces obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Int J Obesity. (2019) 44:213–25. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0332-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Tropini C, Earle KA, Huang KC, Sonnenburg JL. The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function. Cell Host Microbe. (2017) 21:433–42. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Xu Q, Yuan X, Gu T, Li Y, Dai W, Shen X, et al. Comparative characterization of bacterial communities in geese fed all-grass or high-grain diets. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0185590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar