Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 04 April 2016
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
Volume 3 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00028
This article is part of the Research Topic Gut health: The new paradigm in animal production? View all 18 articles

Corrigendum II: Phytogenic Feed Additives as an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Broiler Chickens

This article is a correction to:

  1. Phytogenic Feed Additives as an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Broiler Chickens

    1. Read original article
\r\nGanapathi Raj MurugesanGanapathi Raj Murugesan1Basharat SyedBasharat Syed2Sudipto HaldarSudipto Haldar3Chasity Pender*\r\n Chasity Pender1*
  • 1BIOMIN America Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA
  • 2BIOMIN Holding GmbH, Getzersdorf, Austria
  • 3Department of Animal Nutrition, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, India

A corrigendum on

Phytogenic feed additives as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in broiler chickens
by Murugesan GR, Syed B, Haldar S and Pender C. Front Vet Sci (2015) 2:21. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00021

Revised Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that MICRO-PLUS Konzentrate GmbH, now a subsidiary of BIOMIN Holding GmbH, financially sponsored this project. The authors GM and CP are affiliated with BIOMIN, which produces the phytogenic feed additive used in this trial. BS, affiliated with MICRO-PLUS Konzentrate GmbH at the time the experiment was conducted, is currently affiliated with BIOMIN following the acquisition.

Ethics Declaration

At the time this experiment was conducted, the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee standards for conducting research on poultry species were not established, thus no committee approval was required, and the experiment was conducted according to the ethical norms of the University. The principal investigator of the study has provided the journal’s Editorial Office a retrospective statement that approval was not needed.

Author Contributions

GM: final approval of the version to be submitted, drafting the article, or revising it critically for important intellectual content; BS: contributions to conception and design of the experiment and analysis and interpretation of data; SH: contributions to conception and design of the experiment, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data; CP: final approval of the version to be submitted, drafting the article, or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Keywords: digestibility, histomorphology, microbiota, performance, poultry

Citation: Murugesan GR, Syed B, Haldar S and Pender C (2016) Corrigendum II: Phytogenic Feed Additives as an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 3:28. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00028

Received: 11 March 2016; Accepted: 24 March 2016;
Published: 04 April 2016

Edited by:

Michael Kogut, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USA

Reviewed by:

Kenneth James Genovese, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USA

Copyright: © 2016 Murugesan, Syed, Haldar and Pender. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chasity Pender, Y2hhc2l0eS5wZW5kZXImI3gwMDA0MDtiaW9taW4ubmV0

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.