Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 09 February 2023
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

Posttraumatic checkrein deformity following isolated Lauge–Hansen pronation external rotation stage IV malleolar fracture—a case report and literature review

  • Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The checkrein deformity is characterized by flexion contracture of the interphalangeal joint and extension contracture of the metatarsophalangeal joint. It is a rare condition occurring after lower extremity trauma, especially a malleolar fracture. Little is known about the possible cause and therapeutic strategy. This unique case presents a 20-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of the checkrein deformity secondary to open reduction and internal fixation of a Lauge–Hansen pronation external rotation stage IV malleolar fracture. After performing a detailed physical examination, radiographic evaluation, and ultrasonography, open exploration was performed to remove the hardware and correct the deformity with sole tenolysis of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL). In the 4-month follow-up, no recurrence of the checkrein deformity was observed. This deformity was caused by FHL adhesion. Interosseous membrane injury and fibular fracture together with local hematomas increases the risk of FHL adhesion. Open exploration and tenolysis of the FHL are feasible options to correct the checkrein deformity.

Introduction

The checkrein deformity of the hallux is characterized by flexion contracture of the interphalangeal (IP) joint and extension contracture of the metatarsophalangeal (MP) joint (1). It is usually caused by the pathogenesis of flexor hallucis longus (FHL). A malleolar fracture is a common lower extremity trauma caused by rotational force. Although associated with soft tissue problems, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) might decrease posttraumatic arthritis. The complications of a malleolar fracture usually include malunion, nonunion, and infection (2). To our knowledge, this rare complication, checkrein deformity, has rarely been reported following Lauge–Hansen pronation external rotation (PER) of a stage IV malleolar fracture. Little is known about the diagnosis and therapeutic strategy. We present a unique case of checkrein deformity of the hallux and second toe following a Lauge–Hansen PER stage IV malleolar fracture. The clinical presentation, radiographic evaluation, ultrasonography, and surgical intervention were introduced to highlight this rare complication and therapeutic strategy.

Case report

A 20-year-old male patient [98 kg, 181 cm, body mass index (BMI) = 29.9] was first admitted to our department with diagnosis of Lauge–Hansen PER stage IV malleolar fracture (Figure 1). ORIF with plates and screws was performed to reconstruct the stability of the left ankle joint. The syndesmotic screws were removed at 10 weeks postoperatively (Figure 2). In the follow-up, progressive clawing of the hallux and second toe of the left foot was observed at 3 months postoperatively; because of the lack of an evident effect on gait, the patient did not seek any medical help. The patient sought hardware removal and correction of claw toes 32 months after the primary operation. The physical examination revealed that the deformity of the hallux and second toe was exaggerated with ankle dorsiflexion and ameliorated with ankle plantar flexion (Figure 3). X-rays revealed no dislocation of the IP and MP joints. The fibular fracture healed with no synostosis formation at the fracture site or interosseous membrane (Figure 2). Dynamic ultrasonography indicated the presence of an excursion of the FHL tendon in the malleolar canal (Figure 4). Then, open exploration was performed through the former posteromedial and lateral approaches. First, the original posteromedial incision was used to expose the malleolar canal. After dissecting and protecting the neurovascular bundle, the glide of the FHL tendon was observed within the malleolar canal with ankle and foot motion through posteromedial incision (Figure 5). The retraction of the FHL tendon in the canal resulted in IP joint flexion but limited glide of the proximal musculotendinous unit. Second, original longitudinal fibular incision was used to remove the fibular hardware and explore the FHL muscle belly. After removing the fibular hardware, the FHL muscle belly was identified as being attached to the fibula with fibrous adhesion in the deep posterior compartment (Figure 5). Meanwhile, thorough tenolysis of the FHL muscle belly with fibrous adhesion release was performed. Retraction of the FHL tendon in the retromalleolar canal resulted in normal excursion of the FHL musculotendinous unit. At this stage, full extension of the hallux and second toe had been achieved. Immediate postoperative active motion exercises were initiated for the left foot and ankle. The patient was encouraged to walk in a weight-bearing manner with no immobilization of the lower extremities. Independent of the ankle position, the range of motion of the hallux was restored, and the checkrein deformity was corrected (Figure 6). In the 4-month follow-up, recurrence of the checkrein deformity was not observed.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. X-ray (A, anteroposterior view and B, lateral view) and 3D reconstruction of a CT scan (C) of a primary left ankle injury. Radiographic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of a Lauge–Hansen PER stage IV malleolar fracture.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. X-ray of the left foot and ankle 32 months after the primary operation. No dislocation of the IP and MP joints (A,B) and synostosis formation at the fracture site or interosseous membrane (D) was observed. Syndesmotic screws (C) were removed at postoperative 10 weeks after primary operation.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Macroscopic appearance of the checkrein deformity of the left hallux and second toe 32 months after the primary operation. (A) The deformity was exaggerated with ankle dorsiflexion. (B) The deformity was ameliorated with ankle plantar flexion.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The asterisk indicated the presence of FHL tendon in the malleolar canal by the dynamic ultrasound.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Incisions of the exploration operation and FHL tenolysis. (A) The glide of the FHL tendon was observed within the malleolar canal through posteromedial incision. (B) The FHL muscle belly was attached to the fibula in the deep posterior compartment.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Macroscopic appearance of the left foot after surgical correction. Independent of the ankle position, dorsiflexion (A), plantar flexion (B), neutral (C), and the range of motion of the hallux and second toe was restored.

Discussion

In contrast to fixed claw toes caused by the IP joint lesions, checkrein deformity may be exaggerated or ameliorated by ankle and foot activity. This rare complication might be caused by intrinsic muscle dysfunction, tendon entrapment, or tethering induced by fracture callous formation or Volkmann contracture (3). It could be secondary to tibial, fibular, calcaneus, or talar fractures or dislocation of the ankle joint. Meanwhile, tethering or entrapment of the FHL tendon was the most typical cause (48). After a comprehensive literature review, posttraumatic checkrein deformity of the hallux has rarely been reported following Lauge–Hansen pronation external rotation malleolar fracture (6, 911). Malunited fracture (5), displaced hardware (12), and synostosis at the fracture site may result in limitations of FHL excursion. Another major identified cause was ischemic Volkmann contracture in the deep posterior compartment, which was occult and more likely to be ignored (13, 14). In this scenario, the potential for active flexion of the IP joint was irreparably lost.

Anatomically, the FHL originates from the posterior surface of the fibula in the deep posterior compartment, passes through the medial retromalleolar region, and inserts into the hallux. An invariable intertendinous connection is observed between the FHL and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) at the master knot of Henry (15).

Different surgical methods are available for correcting checkrein deformity, including FHL to extensor hallucis longus (EHL) transfer (16), lengthening the FHL with or without Z-plasty at the fracture site or midfoot (11, 17, 18), tenotomy at the forefoot level (5), or releasing tendon adhesion (19). Currently, the optimal surgical strategy is still not defined. Lengthening of the FHL tendon might be an option for the correction of checkrein deformity caused by diffuse ischemic contracture or poliomyelitis producing a fixed length phenomenon (19). Tenolysis is a feasible option for FHL tendon entrapment or tethering. All surgical plans should be tailored to the presumed cause of the checkrein deformity.

In contrast to the most common supination-external rotation type, the category of Lauge–Hansen PER stage IV appeared as medial mortise widening with deltoid ligament rupture, distal tibiofibular syndesmosis diastasis with interosseous membrane injury, fibular fracture above the syndesmosis, and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament injury. Therefore, ORIF using a combination of medial and lateral approaches was usually performed in the primary operation with the aim of decreasing posttraumatic arthritis.

However, the checkrein deformity occurred 3 months postoperatively. In similar case reports, Leitschuh et al. (6) described flexion deformity of hallux secondary to Lauge–Hansen pronation-eversion stage IV injury. Due to the failure of the first operation, the patient underwent two surgical procedures at an interval of 8 months. The combination of the two operations might result in flexion contracture of the hallux. Adhesion release of the FHL corrected the deformity. Rosenberg and Sferra (9) described a hallux flexion deformity following a closed Salter-Harris type II ankle fracture caused by concomitant tethering of the FHL tendon combined with rupture of the posterior tibialis tendon (PTT). Tenolysis of the FHL and reconstruction of the PTT were performed to achieve normal motion of the hallux. Sanhudo and Lompa (10) and Lee et al. (11) introduced lengthening of the FHL tendon to correct the checkrein deformity following the malleolar fracture. The limitation in their studies was that the definite cause of the deformity was not clarified.

The soft tissue in patients with a Lauge–Hansen PER stage IV fracture might be damaged to varying degrees. Herein, we speculated that interosseous membrane injury and fibular fracture increased the risk of adhesion of the FHL muscle belly to adjacent tissues in our patient. Scarred fibroses following local hematoma might be an additional cause. Preoperative radiographic evaluation and ultrasonography provided useful information to confirm FHL adhesion. A possible adhesion site was located at the fibula in the deep posterior compartment. In addition, the tendinous interconnections between the FHL and FDL tendons might account for the deformity of both the hallux and the second toe. Therefore, sole tenolysis of the FHL sufficed to correct the deformity and improve the motion of the IP and MP joints of both the hallux and second toe with no need to explore FDL. Lengthening of the tendon was unnecessary for FHL adhesion and might even result in compromised foot function.

Summary

This patient suffered from posttraumatic adhesion of the FHL in the deep posterior compartment, resulting in a checkrein deformity of the hallux and second toe. A thorough evaluation of the history, physical examination, ultrasonography, and radiographic evaluation could provide detailed information to confirm the pathology of FHL. The sole tenolysis of the FHL sufficed to correct the deformity of the hallux and second toe due to the intertendinous connection of the FHL and FDL.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

W-tC and Z-yL reviewed the literature and contributed to manuscript drafting. B-jW was responsible for the revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.887611/full#supplementary-material.

Abbreviations

IP, interphalangeal; MP, metatarsophalangeal; FHL, flexor hallucis longus; ORIF, open reduction and internal fixation; PER, pronation external rotation; FDL, flexor digitorum longus; EHL, extensor hallucis longus; PTT, posterior tibialis tendon

References

1. Clawson DK. Claw toes following tibial fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (1974) 103:47–8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197409000-00029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Toth MJ, Yoon RS, Liporace FA, Koval KJ. What's new in ankle fractures. Injury. (2017) 48:2035–41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Santi MD, Botte MJ. Volkmann's ischemic contracture of the foot and ankle: evaluation and treatment of established deformity. Foot Ankle Int. (1995) 16:368–77. doi: 10.1177/107110079501600610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Speer CG, Pike RH. Closed pantalar dislocation with checkrein deformity: a unique case report and literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. (2021) 5:e20.00253. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Holcomb TM, Temple EW, Barp EA, Smith HL. Surgical correction of checkrein deformity after malunited distal tibia fracture: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. (2014) 53:631–4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.04.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Leitschuh PH, Zimmerman JP, Uhorchak JM, Arciero RA, Bowser L. Hallux flexion deformity secondary to entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus tendon after fibular fracture. Foot Ankle Int. (1995) 16:232–5. doi: 10.1177/107110079501600413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Carr JB. Complications of calcaneus fractures entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus: report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma. (1990) 4:166–8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199004020-00011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kim SH, Lee KT, Smith RW, Park YU. Checkrein deformity secondary to entrapment of FHL after talus fracture: a case report. Foot Ankle Int. (2010) 31:336–8. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Checkrein deformity–an unusual complication associated with a closed Salter-Harris type II ankle fracture: a case report. Foot Ankle Int. (1999) 20:591–4. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sanhudo JA, Lompa PA. Checkrein deformity–flexor hallucis tethering: two case reports. Foot Ankle Int. (2002) 23:799–800. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lee HS, Kim JS, Park SS, Lee DH, Park JM, Wapner KL. Treatment of checkrein deformity of the hallux. J Bone Joint Surg Br. (2008) 90:1055–8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bai L, You T, Zhang WT. Checkrein deformity of the hallux caused by misplaced suture-button syndesmosis fixation: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. (2020) 59:598–602. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hernández-Cortés P, Pajares-López M, Hernández-Hernández MA. Ischemic contracture of deep posterior compartment of the leg following isolated ankle fracture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. (2008) 98:404–7. doi: 10.7547/0980404

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Piper KJ, Yen-yi JC, Horsley M. Missed posterior deep, inferior subcompartment syndrome in a patient with an ankle fracture: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. (2010) 49:398.e5–8. doi: 10.7547/0980404

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vasudha TK, Vani PC, Sankaranarayanan G, Rajasekhar S. Communications between the tendons of flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus: a cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat. (2019) 41:1411–9. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02311-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lui TH. Flexor hallucis longus to extensor hallucis longus transfer for correction of hallux flexus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. (2013) 34:1456–9. doi: 10.1177/1071100713487338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lee JH, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim DH. Z-plasty of the flexor hallucis longus tendon at tarsal tunnel for checkrein deformity. J Orthop Surg. (2016) 24:354–7. doi: 10.1177/1602400316

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gadhavi MV, Majmundar DD, Solanki RA. Checkrein deformity of the great toe managed by midfoot flexor hallucis longus Z-plasty: a case report. J Orthop Case Rep. (2019) 9:18–20. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yuen CP, Lui TH. Adhesion of flexor hallucis longus at the site of a tibial-shaft fracture—a cause of a checkrein deformity. Foot Ankle Surg. (2015) 21:e23–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: checkrein deformity, malleolar fracture, flexor hallucis longus, adhesion, Lauge–Hansen

Citation: Chen W, Liu Z and Wang B (2023) Posttraumatic checkrein deformity following isolated Lauge–Hansen pronation external rotation stage IV malleolar fracture—a case report and literature review. Front. Surg. 10:887611. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.887611

Received: 1 March 2022; Accepted: 9 January 2023;
Published: 9 February 2023.

Edited by:

Ling Wang, Hebei Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Hayat Khan, Research Centre, Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Saudi Arabia
Siddhartha Sharma, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, India

© 2023 Chen, Liu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bao-jun Wang wangbaojun@ccmu.edu.cn

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.