This article is a correction to:
Can oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) create more lumbosacral lordosis in lumbar spine surgery than minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)?
Jie Li
Yilei Chen2*
Kaifeng Gan- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Ningbo Medical Centre Li Huili Hospital, Ningbo, China
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China
- 3Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
A corrigendum on
By Li J, Chen Y, Wu H, Gan K, Bei D, Fan T, Chen J and Chen B. (2023) Front. Surg. 10:1063354. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1063354
Error in Figure/Table
In the published article, there was data errors in [TABLE 1 The comparison of general basic data of OLIF and MIS-TLIF] as published. [The data in column “age”, “BMI”, “Operation time”, “Intraoperative bleeding”, “LL, deg,”, “FSL Correction”, “VAS” and “ODI” were incorrectly calculated.]. The corrected [TABLE 1 The comparison of general basic data of OLIF and MIS-TLIF] appear below.
TABLE 1
Table 1. The comparison of general basic data of OLIF and MIS-TLIF.
In the published article, there was data errors in [TABLE 2 The general comparison of OLIF and MIS-TLIF with different number of fused segments] as published. [The data in column “Operation time”, “Intraoperative bleeding”, “LL, deg,”, “FSL Correction” were incorrectly calculated.]. The corrected [TABLE 2 The general comparison of OLIF and MIS-TLIF with different number of fused segments] appear below.
TABLE 2
Table 2. The general comparison of OLIF and MIS-TLIF with different number of fused segments.
In the published article, there was data errors in [Table 3 The General comparison of OLIF + PSF, OLIF Standalone and MIS-TLIF] as published. [The data in column “Operation time”, “Intraoperative bleeding” were incorrectly calculated.]. The corrected [Table 3 The General comparison of OLIF + PSF, OLIF Standalone and MIS-TLIF] appear below.
TABLE 3
Table 3. The general comparison of OLIF + PSF, OLIF standalone and MIS-TLIF.
In the published article, there was data errors in [Figure 5. Post-operative correction of LL, FSL, in OLIF + PSF, OLIF Standalone and MIS-TLIF. A. LL Correction. B. FSL Correction] as published. [The column length was changed because of incorrectly calculated data]. The corrected [Figure 5. Post-operative correction of LL, FSL, in OLIF + PSF, OLIF Standalone and MIS-TLIF. A. LL Correction. B. FSL Correction] appear below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Text Correction
In the published article, there was an error. [Some data was incorrectly calculated].
A correction has been made to [Abstract], [Method], [Paragraph 1]. This sentence previously stated:
“[…mean age 65.8 years…]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[…mean age 66.0 ± 10.8 years…]”
A correction has been made to [Abstract], [Results], [Paragraph 1]. This sentence previously stated:
“[The average operation time and intraoperative bleeding were significantly less in the OLIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (163 ± 68 vs. 233 ± 79 min, 116 ± 148 vs. 434 ± 201 ml, P < 0.001)……. The correction of LL was significantly more in the OLIF + PSF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (9.9 ± 11.1 vs. 4.2 ± 6.1deg, P = 0.034).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[The average operation time and intraoperative bleeding were significantly less in the OLIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (189 ± 83 vs. 229 ± 80 min, 113 ± 138 vs. 421 ± 210 ml). ……. The correction of LL was significantly more in the OLIF + PSF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (10.6 ± 8.7 vs. 4.0 ± 6.1 deg, P = 0.005).]”
A correction has been made to [Results], [Name of Sub-section if there is one], [Paragraph Number]. This sentence previously stated:
“[…while body mass index (BMI) was (23.6 ± 2.8) kg/m2 in the OLIF group, which was lower than that of (25.0 ± 3.1) kg/m2 in the MIS-TLIF group (P < 0.05).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[…while body mass index (BMI) was (22.9 ± 4.4) kg/m2 in the OLIF group, which was lower than that of (24.4 ± 5.0) kg/m2 in the MIS-TLIF group (P > 0.05)]”
A correction has been made to [Results], [Operative time, intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion], [Paragraph 1]. This sentence previously stated:
“[…((χ2 = 5.545, P = 0.019)]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[…((χ2 = 5.545, P = 0.019)]”
A correction has been made to [Results], [Preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores], [Paragraph 1]. This sentence previously stated:
“[In the OLIF group, VAS decreased from to 6.2 ± 2.0 preoperatively to 2.0 ± 1.3 postoperatively, and ODI decreased from 50 ± 18 preoperatively to 15 ± 10 postoperatively (both P < 0.05). In the MIS-TLIF group, VAS decreased from 7.0 ± 1.1 preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.3 postoperatively, and ODI decreased from 56 ± 16 preoperatively to 17 ± 15 postoperatively (both P < 0.05).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[In the OLIF group, VAS decreased from to 6.3 ± 1.9 preoperatively to 1.7 ± 1.4 postoperatively, and ODI decreased from 58.5 ± 16.9 preoperatively to 19.4 ± 12.2 postoperatively (both P < 0.05). In the MIS-TLIF group, VAS decreased from 6.5 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.3 postoperatively, and ODI decreased from 57.0 ± 19.1 preoperatively to 17.6 ± 13.1 postoperatively (both P < 0.05).]”
A correction has been made to [Results], [Pre- and postoperative LL, FSL, ADH and PDH e], [Paragraph 1]. This sentence previously stated:
“[The LL correction was 4.0 ± 10.0 deg in the OLIF group and 4.2 ± 6.1 deg in the MIS-TLIF group (P > 0.05). The FSL correction was 4.1 ± 7.0 deg in the OLIF group and 5.2 ± 4.6 deg in the MIS-TLIF group (P > 0.05).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[The LL correction was 5.8 ± 9.8 deg in the OLIF group and 4.0 ± 6.1 deg in the MIS-TLIF group (P > 0.05). The FSL correction was 4.8 ± 7.2 deg in the OLIF group and 4.9 ± 4.7 deg in the MIS-TLIF group (P > 0.05).]”
A correction has been made to [Results], [Pre- and postoperative LL, FSL, ADH and PDH], [Paragraph 2]. This sentence previously stated:
“[For three-segment fusion, the preoperative and postoperative LL in the OLIF group was significantly smaller than that in the MISTLIF group (t = 2.190, 2.661, both P < 0.05), while the differences in the correction of LL and FSL were not statistically significant in both groups (t = 0.186, 0.303, both P > 0.05).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[For three- segment fusion, the preoperative and postoperative LL in the OLIF group was significantly smaller than that in the MIS- TLIF group (t = 1.831, 1.277, both P < 0.05), while the differences in the correction of LL and FSL were not statistically significant in both groups (t = 0.984, 0.088, both P > 0.05).]”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: OLIF, posterior pedicle screw fixation, OLIF standalone, lumbar degenerative disease, lumbosacral lordosis
Citation: Li J, Chen Y, Wu H, Gan K, Bei D, Fan T, Chen J and Chen B (2023) Corrigendum: Can oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) create more lumbosacral lordosis in lumbar spine surgery than minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)?. Front. Surg. 10:1171387. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1171387
Received: 22 February 2023; Accepted: 11 April 2023;
Published: 28 April 2023.
Approved by: Panagiotis Korovessis, Olympion Medical Center, Greece
© 2023 Li, Chen, Wu, Gan, Bei, Fan, Chen and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jie Li bmluZ2JvbGlqaWVAemp1LmVkdS5jbg== Binhui Chen Y2hlbmJpbmh1aUBuYnUuZWR1LmNu