Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg., 26 January 2023
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

Large pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery: Risk factors and management strategies

\r\nYan Lou,&#x;Yan Lou1,†Yunyan Zhang,&#x;Yunyan Zhang2,†Zhongzhao Wang,&#x;Zhongzhao Wang2,†Chenglong ZhaoChenglong Zhao1Zhenxi LiZhenxi Li1Quan Huang
Quan Huang1*Hao Tang
Hao Tang2*Jianru Xiao
\r\nJianru Xiao1*
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Spine Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai China
  • 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai China

Objective: Large pneumothorax is a rare but dangerous complication following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery. There is little discussion about the features of large pneumothorax following spinal tumor surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of postoperative pneumothorax, identify factors related to large pneumothorax, and propose a management algorithm for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Methods: Included in this retrospective study were 118 patients who developed pneumothorax after receiving thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery between January 2015 and October 2021. A measurement of lung compression ≥20% on chest CT or x-ray was defined as large pneumothorax, and potential risk factors for large pneumothorax were identified by univariate analysis.

Results: Spinal tumor history and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for large pneumothorax. The common symptoms of postoperative pneumothorax were chest pain, chest tightness and dyspnea. The mean longest transverse diameter of tumors was 6.63 ± 2.4 cm. En bloc resection was performed in 70 patients, with a mean operation time of 6.9 ± 2.5 h and mean intraoperative blood loss of 1771 ± 1387 ml. The most common pathologies were chondrosarcoma, giant cell tumors of bone, and neurogenic tumors.

Conclusion: During surgery, an artificial dura mater patch and a prolene suture can be used to repair the pleural and lung defects. We recommend chest CT as the preferred method for identifying postoperative pneumothorax. If a patient presents severe dyspnea, a large pneumothorax or concurrent pleural effusion, application of chest drainage is strongly recommended.

Introduction

Pneumothorax is a relatively uncommon but potentially fatal complication of thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery (1, 2). Postoperative pneumothorax can be easily missed due to the absence of specific symptoms. If not treated in time, it may result in serious implications such as respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, or even death (1, 3). The reported incidence of pneumothorax following posterior spine surgery ranges from 0.2% to 1.6% (1, 4, 5).

However, most related studies have focused on the pneumothorax associated with scoliosis surgery or thoracic rod removal procedures (3, 69), and little attention has been paid to the diagnosis and treatment of pneumothorax after spinal tumor surgery. In scoliosis surgery, pleural rupture is mostly caused by the placement of pedicle screws and the defect is usually small and easily sutured (10). In contrast, pleural defects caused by spinal tumor resection are much larger and more difficult to repair (11). For this reason, the incidence of pneumothorax associated with spinal tumor surgery is higher with more severe symptoms and worse consequences, constituting a formidable clinical challenge.

In this study, we reviewed patients with pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery from January 2015 to October 2021, and analyzed their clinical characteristics, imaging findings and surgical procedures in an attempt to sum up some useful clues for the clinical diagnosis, treatment and prevention, hoping that the results could help enhance spine surgeons' awareness and vigilance regarding the occurrence of postoperative pneumothorax. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients with pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery in a single center.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

We reviewed the electronic medical records and screened out 6,086 hospitalized patients with thoracic and lumbar diseases in our center from January 2015 to October 2021. Based on the chest CT and x-ray reports, 214 patients with pneumothorax during hospitalization were further selected. The inclusion criteria were: (1) patients with primary or metastatic thoracic and lumbar tumors who received surgical treatment; and (2) pneumothorax occurring after surgery whose diagnosis was confirmed by chest CT or x-ray. Exclusion criteria were: (1) patients who had pneumothorax prior to surgery; (2) patients with spinal tumors who underwent puncture or open biopsy; and (3) patients with spinal tumors who underwent percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) or percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). According to the aforementioned criteria, 118 patients were eventually included in our study (Figure 1). The research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the said hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient or their legal guardians.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Diagram showing the selection of patients to be included in this study.

Study methods

We searched the Picture Archiving and Communication System to measure and calculate the lung compression of the patients with postoperative pneumothorax on chest CT or x-ray, and determine whether these patients had concurrent pleural effusion. The lung compression formula for patients with postoperative pneumothorax of chest CT is 1.159* W/D-1.034 (D is the maximal anteroposterior diameter in the transdiaphragmatic thorax and W is the maximal width of the pneumothorax)(12). The lung compression formula of chest x-ray (CXR) is 4.2 + 4.7*(A + B + C) (A is the interpleural distance of the apex; B is the lateral at the middle of the collapsed lung's upper halves; C is the collapsed lung's lower halves) (13). Lung compression ≥20% was defined as a large pneumothorax (14).

Statistical analysis

Patients were classified into two groups based on the degree of lung compression: large pneumothorax and small pneumothorax. Categorical data were presented as the frequency (percentage), whereas continuous data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Univariate analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for large pneumothorax. The independent t-test was used to evaluate continuous variables. The χ2 test was used to assess categorical data. Fisher's exact test was applied when the theoretical frequency was less than five. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (version 27.0, Chicago, Illinois, United States).

Results

Of the 118 patients enrolled in this study, 62 were male and 56 were female with a mean age of 43.2 ± 17.2 (range 10–79) years. All the pneumothoraces that occurred postoperatively in our series were closed pneumothoraces. The common symptoms were chest pain, chest tightness, and dyspnea. Over two-thirds of the patients (n = 79) reported no obvious discomfort. This might be because chest drainage tubes were placed in the surgery in 48 of these patients, and 22 of the remaining 31 asymptomatic patients had small pneumothorax. The tumors were large, with the longest transverse diameter averaging 6.63 ± 2.4 cm. 92.3% (109/118) patients had no history of smoking, and 75.4% (89/118) patients had no underlying lung diseases such as bullae and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The mean body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 22.4, which was within the normal range. Except for two patients who died of non-pneumothorax causes (one died of multiple organ failure and the other of cardiac arrest), the rest of the patients recovered well.

Large pneumothorax patients accounted for 72.0% of all postoperative pneumothorax patients. Univariate analysis showed that spinal tumor history and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for large pneumothorax (Table 1). Based on our analysis and earlier therapeutic experience, we developed an algorithmic strategy for the management of pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery (Figure 2). We recommend chest CT as the choice of examination to confirm pneumothorax after surgery in patients with stable vital signs. Observation was appropriate for patients with small pneumothorax (lung compression ratio <20%) and without dyspnea and pleural effusion. But a chest CT or bedside CXR should be reviewed after 24 h. If the patient developed progressive dyspnea, a large pneumothorax, or concurrent pleural effusion, application of chest drainage was indicated (Figure 3). For patients whose pleurae were repaired during surgery, chest CT should be reviewed after surgery to exclude pneumothorax and pleural effusion. We had a 28-year-old patient who underwent T3–5 recurrent tumor resection. During the separation of the huge tumor, the right pleura was torn inadvertently and sutured continuously with 4-0 prolene afterwards. After the posterior surgery, a right chest drainage tube was placed in advance to avoid postoperative pulmonary complications. However, on the first night after surgery, pneumothorax occurred on the left side (Figure 4). We considered that although the patient's left pleura was not significantly ruptured in surgery, the residual left pleura was too thin to cause the delayed rupture and left pneumothorax. If closed chest drainage was not satisfactory (e.g., persistent air leakage over 48 h, insufficient re-expansion), thoracic surgery consultation was necessary to consider further treatment.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. An algorithmic approach to the management of pneumothorax following thoracic or lumbar tumor surgery.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. A 43-year-old woman underwent T8 en bloc spondylectomy for giant cell tumor of bone through the posterior approach. (A) Preoperative enhanced CT showed that T8 vertebral body had osteolytic bone destruction and a soft tissue mass. There were bone ridges and sclerotic rims in the bone destruction area. (B) Preoperative enhanced MRI showed bone destruction of T8 vertebral body with heterogeneous enhancement. (C) En bloc resection of giant cell tumor of thoracic spine (T8). (D,E) Anteroposterior and lateral x-ray of the thoracic spine after surgery. (F) On the first postoperative day, Chest CT showed severe left pneumothorax. (G) After left chest closed drainage, reexamination of chest CT showed the left lung was re-expanded well.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. A 28-year-old patient who underwent T3-5 recurrent tumors resection. (A) Preoperative CT angiography of the thoracic aorta showed bone destruction in the right part of the vertebral body, lamina, transverse process and corresponding ribs of T3-5, accompanied by the formation of paravertebral soft tissue masses. (B) Preoperative enhanced MRI showed oval tumor tissue on the right side of T4. (C) 3D-printed model of tumor (green). (D) The tumor specimen completely resected in piecemeal. (E) Although the right pleura was torn and sutured in the surgery, the bedside chest radiograph indicated a left pneumothorax unexpectedly on the first night after surgery. The white arrow indicate the pneumothorax line. (F) The left pneumothorax disappeared, the left lung was re-expanded well, and the bilateral chest drainage tubes were removed at discharge.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery.

Discussion

The term “pneumothorax” was first coined by Itard in 1803, later characterized by Laennec in 1819, and denotes the collection of air in the pleural cavity. Most patients have a rapid onset and often present with sudden chest pain, tightness, and dyspnea. Nonetheless, some patients have unobvious symptoms that require imaging tests to confirm. Due to the particular characteristics of thoracic and upper lumbar tumors, the proportion of pleural rupture during surgery is higher, and the possibility of post-operative pneumothorax is greater. Therefore, pneumothorax after thoracic and lumbar tumor resection is a complication that cannot be ignored. There is no comprehensive research on the diagnosis and treatment of this frequently neglected complication.

Based on our analysis, the following reasons may contribute to the occurrence of pneumothorax after spinal tumor surgery. First, in patients with primary thoracic tumors with huge paravertebral soft tissue masses that adhere to the pleura tightly or even invade part of the pleura or the lungs, an en bloc resection with a wide margin is often necessary to remove the tumor together with the involved pleura and lung tissues. Then the 4-0 prolene suture is used to close the lungs and the pleura. If the defect area is too large to be sutured directly, an artificial dura mater patch will be used to repair the pleura. If the ligation line falls off after surgery, pneumothorax may occur. Second, scar tissue adhesion to the pleura is severe in spinal tumor revision surgery, and there are no normal tissue boundaries. During tumor dissection, it is easy to tear the pleura. Another situation occurred in one case of our series, in which no evident pleural breach was noticed during operation but the residual pleura became extremely thin due to wide excision of the tumor, and a delayed rupture of the pleura occurred after surgery, resulting in a pneumothorax (Figure 4). Finally, some patients have previous pulmonary diseases such as COPD, bronchiectasis, or bullae. After surgery, the transpulmonary pressure suddenly increases as a result of coughing and sputum expectoration, which may lead to destruction of the alveolar wall or bullae. Consequently, air enters the pleural cavity to form a pneumothorax. In our study, two patients with lower lumbar tumors developed pneumothorax after surgery, which might be due to this reason.

Patients with postoperative pneumothorax due to pleural rupture are often accompanied by pleural effusion and lung infection. Consequently, the lungs further collapse, which directly affects the ventilation function, aggravates hypoxia and carbon dioxide retention, and induces respiratory failure, multiple organ dysfunction, or even death. Due to the application of postoperative analgesics, the symptoms of pneumothorax in patients are not typical. Bedside, chest radiographs in the supine position cannot clearly identify pneumothorax, and some spine surgeons lack a comprehensive understanding of postoperative pneumothorax, all of which contribute to pneumothorax after spinal tumor surgery being easily missed.

Compared with spontaneous pneumothorax, postoperative pneumothorax should be treated more positively. After years of clinical practice and exploration, our center has developed an algorithmic approach to the prevention, diagnosis and management of pneumothorax following thoracic or lumbar tumor surgery. Ample evidence suggests that COPD or emphysema (15), cystic fibrosis (16), severe asthma (17), tuberculosis (18), lung cancer (19) and interstitial lung disease (20) may lead to secondary pneumothorax. In terms of preoperative prevention, for patients with spinal tumors, chest x-rays, blood gas analysis, and lung function evaluation should be performed before surgery to assess the reserve capacity of the lungs. If a patient presents severe restrictive ventilatory dysfunction, chest CT should be performed to rule out the existence of lung pathological changes. Smokers should abstain from tobacco for at least 2 weeks before spine surgery. Preoperative inspiratory muscle training is effective to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (21).

During the surgery, Spine surgeons should not only be familiar with the anatomy of the spine and its surrounding structures but also master the surgical techniques of meticulous dissection. In the process of dissecting the soft tissue on both sides of the vertebral tumor, special attention should be paid to the separation of the adhesion between the pleura and the tumor capsule. The pleura is easily torn during the process of removing the vertebral tumor by rotating around the dural sac. To minimize the risk, we can temporarily decrease the tidal volume for a short period of time to create more surgical manipulating space for rotating the spinal tumor safely. If the pleural tear occurs during the operation, the pleura should be closed in time with a 4-0 prolene suture. If the pleural defect area is too large to be sutured directly, it can be repaired with an artificial dura mater patch. When the pleural defect cannot be sutured or repaired, a chest drainage tube should be placed on the affected side after the operation.

In terms of postoperative management, Patients need to be confined in bed for 1–2 weeks after spinal tumor surgery and cannot undergo a CXR in a standing position. On a supine chest radiograph, the only sign of pneumothorax may be a deep lateral costophrenic angle on the involved side, which is called the deep sulcus sign (22). Besides, patients with intraoperative pleural tears are often complicated by pneumonia and pleural effusion after surgery, which decreases the sensitivity of CXR in diagnosing postoperative pneumothorax. Therefore, if the patient's vital signs are stable, we recommend chest CT as the preferred examination for pneumothorax after spinal tumor surgery. CT scan can not only identify small pneumothoraces but also give a precise assessment of the pneumothorax size. Thoracic sonography has been increasingly used in the diagnosis of pneumothorax. A meta-analysis of 13 studies (23), demonstrated that thoracic ultrasonography offered a 78% sensitivity and a 98% specificity vs. 39% and 99% for CXR. However, the diagnostic reliability of ultrasonography is highly dependent on the examiner's experience and it is impossible to assess the size of a pneumothorax. Therefore, ultrasonography should be supplemented with a supine CXR to rule out pneumothorax, particularly in patients who are unable to be transferred for chest CT.

Postoperatively, it is very important to teach patients about inspiratory muscle training in the early stages (24). We also recommend instructing patients about effective and appropriate expectoration to avoid persistent and severe coughing. We suggest that patients with small post-operative pneumothorax without dyspnea should be observed closely. Clinical and imaging evaluations including chest CT or bedside CXR should be performed again after 24 h. If small pneumothorax develops into large pneumothorax or dyspnea aggravates progressively, closed chest drainage should be performed in time. Tension pneumothorax is a potentially life-threatening event that needs immediate intervention for the existing or expected cardiovascular depression or progressive dyspnea. In the case of large or symptomatic pneumothorax, we recommend the application of a closed chest drain. Re-expansion edema may develop in very few patients following chest drainage. In very rare cases, intubation is required due to the dissemination of pulmonary edema to both lungs (25). Patients with re-expansion edema should be identified early and dealt with promptly to avoid poor prognosis. The indication for the removal of the chest tube is adequate re-expansion of both lungs and the absence of air leakage. We recommend surgical therapy in patients with persistent air leaks or insufficient re-expansion after chest drain therapy.

The limitation of this study is its single-center retrospective design. Potential selection bias and confounding bias are inevitable. In this study, we mainly described the clinical features of pneumothorax in patients receiving thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery and discussed its diagnosis and intervention. Further investigation is required to clarify the underlying risk factors leading to pneumothorax after spinal tumor surgery. In addition, the overall incidence of postoperative pneumothorax is also difficult to estimate, because not all patients with thoracic and lumbar tumors underwent chest CT or chest x-ray postoperatively. Thus, some asymptomatic patients with pneumothorax would be missed. Prospective, multicenter cohort studies are needed to determine the overall incidence of postoperative pneumothorax.

Conclusions

In conclusion, most patients with pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery had no history of smoking or pre-existing pulmonary diseases. Spinal tumor history and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for large pneumothorax. During the surgery, an artificial dura mater patch and prolene suture can be used to repair the pleural and lung defects. If the patient's pleural defect cannot be sutured or repaired, placement of a chest drainage tube during the surgery can help reduce the degree of postoperative pneumothorax or pleural effusion. Chest CT should be the preferred examination due to its high sensitivity. We recommend observation in small pneumothorax patients without dyspnea and pleural effusion. If the patient develops severe dyspnea, large pneumothorax, or concurrent pleural effusion, application of chest drainage is indicated.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Changzheng Hospital Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. HT and JX made substantial contributions to the design of the work. Material preparation, data collection were performed by YL, YZ and ZW. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by CZ, ZL and QH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YL and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. YL, YZ and ZW contributed equally to this work and all should be considered as first author. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Shanghai Sailing Program (21YF1457100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31970663 to J.X.), Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Medical Special Fund (2019CZJS221) and Excellent Young Physician Project of Changzheng Hospital Pyramid Talent Project (YQ683).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Leigh-Smith S, Harris T. Tension pneumothorax–time for a re-think? Emerg Med J. (2005) 22:8–16. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.010421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, Baldus C. Analysis of pulmonary function and chest cage dimension changes after thoracoplasty in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. (1995) 20:1343–50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199520120-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Crasto JA, Wawrose RA, Donaldson WF. Severe pulmonary injury leading to death during thoracic rod removal: a case report. Eur Spine J. (2020) 29:183–7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06591-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Li G, Lv G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Metkar US, Liu Z, et al. Complications associated with thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J. (2010) 19:1576–84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1316-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Anderson PR, Puno MR, Lovell SL, Swayze CR. Postoperative respiratory complications in non-idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (1985) 29:186–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02183.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Imposti F, Cizik A, Bransford R, Bellabarba C, Lee MJ. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after spine surgery. Evid-Based Spine-Care J. (2010) 1:26–33. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rankin D, Mathew PS, Kurnutala LN, Soghomonyan S, Bergese SD. Tension pneumothorax during surgery for thoracic spine stabilization in prone position: a case report and review of literature. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. (2014) 2:2324709614537233. doi: 10.1177/2324709614537233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Viswanathan A, Relyea K, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Pneumothorax complicating “in-out-in” thoracic pedicle screw placement for kyphotic deformity correction in a child. J Neurosurg Pediatr. (2008) 2:379–84. doi: 10.3171/PED.2008.2.12.379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kotani T, Akazawa T, Sakuma T, Shitara T, Sonoda M, Minami S. Pseudopneumothorax in scoliosis surgery diagnosed with intraoperative O-arm computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop Part B. (2013) 22:413–5. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283633089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Roush TF, Crawford AH, Berlin RE, Wolf RK. Tension pneumothorax as a complication of video-assisted thorascopic surgery for anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis in an adolescent female. Spine. (2001) 26:448–50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang T, Jia Q, Fan R, Qian M, Yang C, Wei H, et al. Multi-level en bloc resection as a preferred salvage therapy for recurrent thoracolumbar chondrosarcoma: a comparative study with piecemeal resection. Spine. (2020) 45:789–97. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gou J, Jiang Z, Wang P, Wang L, Chen W, Fang X. Diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral CT scan in lung compression ratio of patients with pulmonary contusion complicated by pneumothorax or hydropneumothorax. Am J Transl Res. (2021) 13:3004–9.34017468

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Collins CD, Lopez A, Mathie A, Wood V, Jackson JE, Roddie ME. Quantification of pneumothorax size on chest radiographs using interpleural distances: regression analysis based on volume measurements from helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1995) 165:1127–30. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schnell J, Beer M, Eggeling S, Gesierich W, Gottlieb J, Herth FJF, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax: german S3 guideline. Respiration. (2019) 97:370–402. doi: 10.1159/000490179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nakajima J, Takamoto S, Murakawa T, Fukami T, Yoshida Y, Kusakabe M. Outcomes of thoracoscopic management of secondary pneumothorax in patients with COPD and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. Surg Endosc. (2009) 23:1536–40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0438-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kioumis IP, Zarogoulidis K, Huang H, Li Q, Dryllis G, Pitsiou G, et al. Pneumothorax in cystic fibrosis. J Thorac Dis. (2014) 6(Suppl 4):S480–487. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.09.27

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Porpodis K, Zarogoulidis P, Spyratos D, Domvri K, Kioumis I, Angelis N, et al. Pneumothorax and asthma. J Thorac Dis. (2014) 6(Suppl 1):S152–161. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Shamaei M, Tabarsi P, Pojhan S, Ghorbani L, Baghaei P, Marjani M, et al. Tuberculosis-associated secondary pneumothorax: a retrospective study of 53 patients. Respir Care. (2011) 56:298–302. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lai RS, Perng RP, Chang SC. Primary lung cancer complicated with pneumothorax. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (1992) 22:194–7.1518168

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Johannesma PC, Reinhard R, Kon Y, Sriram JD, Smit HJ, van Moorselaar RJ, et al. Prevalence of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in patients with apparently primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. (2015) 45:1191–4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00196914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Katsura M, Kuriyama A, Takeshima T, Fukuhara S, Furukawa TA. Preoperative inspiratory muscle training for postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing cardiac and major abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 10:CD010356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010356.pub2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Oh JK, Ahn MI, Kim HL, Park SH, Shin E. Retrodiaphragmatic portion of the lung: how deep is the posterior costophrenic sulcus on posteroanterior chest radiography? Clin Radiol. (2009) 64:786–91. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Alrajab S, Youssef AM, Akkus NI, Caldito G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care. (2013) 17:R208. doi: 10.1186/cc13016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Brocki BC, Andreasen JJ, Langer D, Souza DSR, Westerdahl E. Postoperative inspiratory muscle training in addition to breathing exercises and early mobilization improves oxygenation in high-risk patients after lung cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. (2016) 49:1483–91. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv359

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Petiot A, Tawk S, Ghaye B. Re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Lancet. (2018) 392:507. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31722-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pneumothorax, spinal tumor surgery, complication, en bloc resection, chest drainage

Citation: Lou Y, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhao C, Li Z, Huang Q, Tang H and Xiao J (2023) Large pneumothorax following thoracic and lumbar tumor surgery: Risk factors and management strategies. Front. Surg. 10:1066841. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066841

Received: 11 October 2022; Accepted: 9 January 2023;
Published: 26 January 2023.

Edited by:

Chuiguo Sun, Peking University Third Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Xiaoji Luo, Chongqing Medical University, China
Ziya Levent Gokaslan, Brown University, United States

© 2023 Lou, Zhang, Wang, Zhao, Li, Huang, Tang and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Quan Huang Y3pzcGluZTJAMTYzLmNvbQ== Hao Tang dGFuZ2hhb18wOTIxQDEyNi5jb20= Jianru Xiao Y3pzcGluZWNlbnRlckAxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.