Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg., 03 May 2023
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

The effectiveness of pre-contoured titanium alloy rods in inducing thoracic kyphosis after sequential spinal releases in an in vitro biomechanical model

\r\nJinhui Shi&#x;Jinhui ShiNathaniel R. OrdwayNathaniel R. OrdwayMike H. SunMike H. SunStephen A. AlbaneseStephen A. AlbaneseWilliam F. Lavelle
\r\nWilliam F. Lavelle*
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Syracuse, NY, United States

Purpose: Evaluate the ability of pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis (TK) in human cadaveric spines and determine the effectiveness of sequential surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) release procedures.

Methods: Six thoracolumbar (T3-L2) spine specimens were instrumented with pedicle screws bilaterally (T4–T12). Over correction using pre-contoured rods was performed for intact condition and Cobb angle was measured. Rod radius of curvature (RoC) was measured pre- and post-reduction. The process was repeated following sequential release procedures of (1) interspinous and supraspinous ligaments (ISL); (2) ligamentum flavum; (3) Ponte osteotomy; (4) posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL); and (5) transforaminal discectomy. Cobb measurements determined the effective contribution of release on TK and RoC data displayed effects of reduction to the rods.

Results: The intact TK (T4–12) was 38.0° and increased to 51.7° with rod reduction and over correction. Each release resulted in 5°–7°of additional kyphosis; the largest releases were ISL and PLL. All releases resulted in significant increases in kyphosis compared to intact with rod reduction and over correction. Regionally, kyphosis increased ∼2° for each region following successive releases. Comparing RoC before and after reduction showed significant 6° loss in rod curvature independent of release type.

Conclusion: Kyphosis increased in the thoracic spine using pre-contoured and over corrected rods. Subsequent posterior releases provided a substantial, meaningful clinical change in the ability to induce additional kyphosis. Regardless of the number of releases, the ability of the rods to induce and over correct kyphosis was reduced following reduction.

1. Introduction

Spinal deformities associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have historically been thought of as a coronal plane issue. Deformity techniques have concentrated on restoring the coronal plane alignment. More recently, surgeons have begun to understand the importance of the sagittal plane (1). Reconstructive procedures that do not involve restoration of lumbar lordosis have been found to be detrimental (24). Failure to restore lumbar lordosis may result in sagittal plane imbalance with the associated disability of a flat back deformity. Reconstruction of normal thoracic kyphosis is also potentially important. A patient's thoracic kyphosis is considered the primary sagittal curve whereby an individual develops their secondary cervical lordosis and lumbar lordosis (5). The implications for failure to restore normal thoracic kyphosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are just beginning to be understood (6, 7).

Newton et al. (8) evaluated the sagittal alignment of thoracic AIS using EOS as a “3-D sagittal plane”, and the results showed that thoracic AIS patients had considerable thoracic hypokyphosis prior to surgery. Sullivan et al. (9) concluded the increasing severity of coronal plane curvature was associated with a progressive loss of thoracic kyphosis, and the appropriate intraoperative techniques for correction of idiopathic scoliosis should be applied in all three planes. Unfortunately, several studies (10, 11) have indicated that posterior pedicle screw correction and fixation are not efficient in restoring thoracic kyphosis to a normal range. Surgeons have come to better understand the sagittal balance of the global spine. In an attempt to improve sagittal plane reconstruction, surgeons may choose to pre-contour the rods to induce thoracic kyphosis; however, this is often limited by the rigidity of the spine (12). Numerous techniques for releasing the spine have been described (1315). These includes ligamentous releases, discectomy procedures as well as bony resections.

To our knowledge, the extent to which these releases improve the ability for a contoured rod to induce thoracic kyphosis has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis in a cadaveric spine and to determine the effectiveness sequential posterior releasing procedures.

2. Methods

2.1. Specimen preparation

Fresh thoracolumbar spine specimens, T3-L2, were dissected from six cadavers (4 females, 2 males; age range: 24–66 years). The specimens were chosen based on the following inclusion criteria: no prior spinal surgery or instrumentation, free of osteophytes, no significant degeneration (disc height collapse), no spinal deformity or osteoporosis. Specimens were manually manipulated to ensure reasonable flexibility in all levels of interest. Lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs were acquired to confirm all levels were free of spinal deformity and did not have significant degeneration or other pathological conditions. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed on a Lunar DPX-IQ Pencil Beam Densitometer (General Electric, Louisville, KY) and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were acquired using a lumbar protocol. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) definition for osteopenia, the T-score had to be greater than −1.5 to be included in the study.

Monoaxial pedicle screws (Expedium, Depuy Spine, Raynham, MA) of an appropriate diameter for each pedicle (approximately 80% fill) were placed from T4–T12 bilaterally using a free hand technique based on anatomic landmarks. The screw placement was confirmed by direct palpation of the screw path with a ball tip probe as well as a visual inspection with a C-arm.

2.2. Spinal releases examined

All specimens were examined initially with a Cobb angle measurement from T4–12 from a lateral radiograph. A rod contouring and reduction process followed as well as a subsequent, sequential release process (see subsequent paragraph). Each thoracolumbar spine specimen was tested independently from intact to final release. Surgical releases were performed from T4–T12, and each Release condition was with instrumentation applied:

Intact – Uninstrumented thoracic spine specimen.

Release 0 – Intact specimen, no ligamentous releases or osteotomy.

Release 1 – The intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments (ISL) were transected.

Release 2 – The ligamentum flavum was transected.

Release 3 – The facet joints were removed with Kerrison's consistent with a Ponte osteotomy.

Release 4 – The posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) was transected.

Release 5 – The discectomy was performed from a transforaminal approach.

2.3. Rod contouring and reduction

In addition to the initial intact Cobb measurement, Cobb angle from T4–12 was determined for each Release condition. A novel rod-bender (Figure 1) was used to create symmetrically bent rods at a variety of curvatures. This allowed generation of consistent, over corrected contoured rods based on the Cobb angle. A new pair of 5.5 mm titanium alloy rods was utilized for each thoracolumbar spine specimen for the kyphotic correction procedure. The lengths of each pair of rods were cut based on the length of T4–T12 while allowing extra length in consideration of the forthcoming 5 releases and overcorrection at each step. The rod radius of curvature (RoC) was determined prior to the application to confirm the overcorrection and for follow-up data analyses. The rod RoC was determined by quantitatively analyzing digital images (Image J software, ver. 1.52q, NIH) of the rods (Figure 2) and applying the formula:

RoC=tan1(2rc)
FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. A novel automated rod bender was used to create consistent, over corrected contour based upon the level of kyphosis.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. An example image of bilateral, contoured spinal rods prepared for reduction and correction process. The chord length and height are used to calculate the radius of curvature (RoC) for each rod.

In the formula, “c” represents the chord length between the ends of the rod and “r” is the perpendicular distance from the middle of the cord to the mid arc of the rod. Incremental changes in rod RoC were performed with the rod bender to prepare the pair of rods for the subsequent release condition.

At each Release condition, the rods were aligned and placed into the cranial and caudal pedicle screws with loose set caps and then gradually reduced into the apex of the construct utilizing turn down type reduction devices. A lateral radiograph with instrumentation and following the reduction was collected and the Cobb angle measured. The rods were removed, and digital images were collected again so the rod RoC could be determined post-reduction. The process was repeated for each Release condition and with over correcting the rod based on the prior release Cobb angle.

2.4. Radiographic measurements

Cobb angles from the lateral radiographic images were analyzed for all release conditions. The global thoracic kyphosis (TK) was measured from the upper endplate of T4 to the lower endplate of T12. Regional kyphosis was also measured. The superior TK was defined from the upper endplate of T4 to the upper endplate of T7; the middle TK was defined from the upper endplate of T7 to the upper endplate of T10, and the inferior TK which defined from the upper endplate of T10 to the lower endplate of T12. A representation of the global and regional thoracic kyphosis measurements is shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Global and regional thoracic kyphosis measurements collected during the sequential spinal releases.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were determined for the global and regional TK measures for the intact and all release conditions (Release 0–5). To examine the effect of Release condition on global TK, a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Student-t test was performed. Differences in regional TK were examined with a one-way ANOVA for each Release condition and post hoc Student-t test comparing the region (superior, middle, inferior). For the effect of the planned correction with the pre-contoured rods, a paired Student-t test was performed on the rod RoC measurements before (pre) and after (post) rod reduction for each Release condition. The level of significance was set to α = 0.01.

3. Results

The release procedures were thoroughly performed. There were no screw pull-outs following overcorrection and rod reduction for all the releases performed. An example of an instrumented thoracic spine in the various stages of release is shown in Figures 49.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 0—intact with over corrected bilateral rods.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 1—ISL transected.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 2—ligamentum flavum transected.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 3—facet joints removed and consistent with a Ponte osteotomy.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 4—PLL transected.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Lateral radiograph of sequential release of the thoracic spine with pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis: Release 5—transforaminal discectomy.

The average intact global TK from T4–T12 was 38.0° (range 22.1°–51.4°) and TK significantly increased to 51.7° (range 39.4°–64.0°) with overcorrection and pre-contoured rods applied (Table 1, Release 0). The average initial RoC prior to placement and reduction for the Release 0 condition was 42.1° (range 28.5°–53.5°) and increased incrementally to an average final RoC of 55.4° (range 46.6°–64.0°) prior to placement and reduction for the Release 5 condition. Each surgical release resulted in a significant (p < 0.01) increase of 5°–7° of additional kyphosis compared to the intact status with the rods (Figure 10).

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Comparison of global (T4–T12) thoracic kyphosis following the various stages of release and applied bilateral rods (over corrected and reduced).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Thoracic kyphosis measurements (T4–T12) for intact, uninstrumented thoracic spine and after each release condition with instrumented rods (degrees).

Regionally, kyphosis increased following successive surgical releases, which was approximately 1° at the superior region and approximately 2° at the middle and inferior regions for Releases 2–5 (Table 2). The largest increase occurred in the T7–10 region when the ISL was transected. There were significant differences (p < 0.01) between the regions T4–7 and T10–12 for the posterior releases (Release 2 and 3), and subsequent anterior releases (Release 4 and 5) displayed significant changes between the T7–10 and T10–12 regions (Figure 11).

FIGURE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. Comparison of regional (T4–T7, T7–10, T10–12) thoracic kyphosis following the various stages of release and applied bilateral rods (over corrected and reduced).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Average regional thoracic kyphosis measurements for the intact, uninstrumented thoracic spine and after each release condition with instrumented rods (degrees).

Comparing the radius of curvature of the pre-contoured rods before and after application showed a significant loss in rod curvature of 6° (p < 0.001) and this loss was independent of release type (Figure 12).

FIGURE 12
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 12. Comparison of the radius of curvature (RoC) of the bilateral rods pre- and post-instrumentation and reduction during various stages of release.

4. Discussion

Main thoracic curve scoliosis, which is defined as Lenke Type 1 scoliosis, is the most common type of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Surgeons have gradually recognized that the restoration of sagittal alignment of the main thoracic curve is also important in addition to the correction of the coronal plane during surgery (16, 17). In a Lenke Type 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis study, Hwang et al. (18) reported the sagittal alignment of the thoracic spine is related to that of the cervical spine when treated with surgery. The cervical spine may decompensate into significant kyphosis if postoperative TK is excessively decreased. Another study (19) concluded TK and lumbar lordosis (LL) both tend to decrease after posterior correction surgery; therefore LL-TK may be an important compensatory mechanism in maintaining sagittal balance. It is reasonable to deduce that a decrease of TK after surgical correction has the potential to increase the risk of related adverse consequences, such as, disc degeneration, flat back, sagittal imbalance, and a poorer quality of life. Additionally, thoracic hypokyphosis of less than 20° has been correlated with decreased pulmonary function.

Many factors may influence TK during surgery. The surgeon's experience, feature of the deformity, rod stiffness, the shape of the pre-countered rods, pedicle screw density, flexibility of the spine and release procedures all contribute to the corrective effort of the curve of the thoracic spine (20, 21). In this current in vitro biomechanical study, the focus was to examine TK and understand the effect of sequential releases and correction with symmetric, pre-contoured rods. This in vitro cadaveric model and study design had a number of limitations that could have influenced the results. The global and regional TK in the current in vitro study were similar to the TK described in adult, asymptomatic volunteers by Lafage et al. (22). All thoracolumbar specimens were screened and selected to ensure flexibility, however how the flexibility of the adult spine compares to the adolescent spine is unknown (23). Another limitation was that only symmetric, pre-contoured 5.5 mm titanium alloy rods were used and bilateral pedicle screws placement to induce the kyphosis of thoracic spine. The rods have a capacity of plastic deformation which may lead to loss of correction. Therefore, a novel rod-bender was utilized for symmetry and consistency to create a larger curve for the rods to induce the maximal thoracic kyphosis which was confirmed by the reduction in the rod RoC following application. Although Cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy rods are stiffer than Ti rods, the ability of deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of the two rods is still controversial, and some studies have indicated that both rods can achieve sufficient correction in Lenke 1–3 types (24). Bowden et al. (25) showed CoCr rods had better ability of correction of TK compared with Ti rods in AIS from a meta-analysis. In our study, since one purpose was to measure the effectiveness of sequential posterior releasing procedures, we choose Ti rods because they are more flexible than CoCr rods which means the ability of TK correction by sequential posterior releasing procedures could be evaluated accurately. We placed bilateral pedicle screws at each level to achieve the highest screw density in order to provide better stabilization and corrective force (20). In our study, no screw pull-outs or loosening occurred in any of the six cadavers after the repeated correction procedures.

Lafage et al. has shown in asymptomatic individuals there was greater segmental kyphosis proximal to T7 than distal to T7 (22). One finding of the current in vitro study was the regional increase in TK following successive releases and over correction was proportionally greater in the regions distal to T7 (T7–T10, T10–12) in comparison to proximal (T4–7). This result could potentially be explained by the symmetry of the prepared over corrected rods. Clinically this may have significance in that rod curvature and over correction should account and target these regional kyphotic differences avoiding symmetric pre-contoured rods unless warranted.

The posterior release procedure included a ligamentous complex transection, bony resection, discectomy, and rib head resection. In a previous study, Cheng et al. (26) indicated that a posterior only release could provide a correction similar to an anterior–posterior combined approach. Rynearson et al. (27) performed an in vitro biomechanical analysis and concluded a wide posterior release of the thoracolumbar spine provided significant correction. However, they did not analyze the ability of each posterior release for sagittal alignment. Namikawa et al. (28) evaluated 24 patients with Lenke Type 1 or 2 AIS and found a concave rib head resection and convex transverse process resection as posterior release procedures could achieve satisfactory coronal and sagittal curve correction. In our study, we assessed the posterior release step by step and found each release resulted in 5°–7° of additional kyphosis, with the largest releases being ISL and PLL. Although an ISL transection procedure is easily accomplished, our results demonstrated that each release is additive. AIS patients are typically hypokyphotic and coronal correction maneuvers historically ignore or even exaggerate the hypokyphosis (8, 9). Doing an isolated ISL transection when attempting to correct the hypokyphosis in an AIS patient may not be adequate to achieve a substantial thoracic kyphosis restoration when only an average of 6.9° of kyphosis was produced by an ISL release in our study. Newton et al. confirmed that many AIS patients present with a preoperative thoracic kyphosis of less than 10° (8). Each release is additive in terms of imparted kyphosis. Adding a release of the ligamentum flavum and possibly the facet joints may be necessary to induce a more normal thoracic kyphosis of between 20° and 40°. We believe one reason for this observation was the stability of thoracic spine region which was enhanced by the rib cage. Another reason may be the space of the spinous process at thoracic region was small from an anatomic view, which means the range of motion could not change significantly. Therefore, we recommend doing an ISL transection and ligamentum flavum transection as posterior releases in order to gain a satisfactory sagittal curve in hypokyphotic patients with AIS. A Ponte osteotomy, PLL transection and discectomy as subsequent releases resulted in significant (p < 0.05) increases in correction compared to the intact condition with rod correction. However, these procedures are more aggressive and may potentially lead to more blood loss and higher neurological deficit risks. A multilevel Ponte osteotomy has been shown to be useful in restoring TK with AIS (29). In recent years, three-column osteotomy including PLL transection and discectomy has been used for AIS as well, especially in revision cases (30). However, in the current in vitro study, transection of the ISL and ligamentum flavum was enough to create thoracic kyphosis in AIS, so we do not recommend surgeons do Releases 3–5 routinely, although we evaluated the ability of TK correction of Releases 3–5.

The purpose of this cadaver study was to demonstrate the relative contributions of the intrinsic bony and ligamentous structures to the sagittal stiffness that must be overcome by a posterior based screw and rod instrumentation system that would typically be used to correct an idiopathic scoliosis. These deformities are often hypokyphotic and the restoration of more normal thoracic kyphosis is arguably important. The practicality and safety of releasing the posterior longitudinal ligament and the disc is limited but was completed in this study to attempt to demonstrate their relative contributions compared to more traditional releases of the posterior ligaments and facets. In that way, we believe the flexible spine specimens in our study have not hindered our results.

5. Conclusions

Increased kyphosis was created in the thoracic spine using pre-contoured rods. Subsequent posterior releases provided a substantial and meaningful change in the ability to induce additional kyphosis. Although each posterior release was effective for induction of TK (ISL and PLL having the largest increases), an ISL transection alone may not provide enough kyphosis to bring a hypokyphotic AIS spine into a more normal kyphosis as an average of 6.9 degrees of kyphosis was induced in our study specimens. More than one release was necessary to induce a clinical change in TK compared to the overcorrection accomplished on the intact thoracic spine with instrumentation. Reductions in radius of curvature of the titanium alloy rods consistently occurred following attempted over correction with rod reduction, even though the thoracic spine was sequentially destabilized with each release.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

All of the authors have made equal, substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. They have drafted and revised the manuscript and have approved the version to be published. The agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. LeHuec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. (2019) 28(9):1889–905. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine. (2005) 30(18):2024–9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine. (2002) 27(4):387–92. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy J-P. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine. (2009) 34(17):E599–606. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gray H. Anatomy, descriptive and surgical. A revised American edition from the fifteenth English edition, Pick TP, editor. New York: Bounty Books (1977).

6. Sudo H, Ito H, Abe Y, Abumi K, Takahata M, Nagahama K, et al. Surgical treatment of Lenke 1 thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with maintenance of kyphosis using the simultaneous double-rod rotation technique. Spine. (2014) 39(14):1163–9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bodendorfer BM, Shah SA, Bastrom TP, Lonner BS, Yazay B, Samdani AF, et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a twenty-year period: are we getting better? Spine. (2020) 45(23):1625–33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Newton PO, Fujimori T, Doan J, Reighard FG, Bastrom TP, Misaghi A. Defining the “three-dimensional sagittal plane” in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2015) 97(20):1694–701. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sullivan TB, Reighard FG, Osborn EJ, Pavaresh KC, Newton PO. Thoracic idiopathic scoliosis severity is highly correlated with 3D measures of thoracic kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2017) 99(11):e54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, Weidenbaum M, Gomez JA, Lee FY-I, et al. Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine. (2007) 32(4):448–52. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale A, Oto M, Littleton AG, Mason DE, et al. Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. (2012) 32(5):490–9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318250c629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sudo H, Abe Y, Kokabu T, Kuroki K, Iwata A, Iwasaki N. Impact of multilevel facetectomy and rod curvature on anatomical spine reconstruction in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. (2018) 43(19):E1135–42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Feiertag MA, Horton WC, Norman JT, Proctor FC, Hutton WC. The effect of different surgical releases on thoracic spinal motion. A cadaveric study. Spine. (1995) 20(14):1604–11. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199507150-00009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Uribe JS, Smith DA, Dakwar E, Baaj AA, Mundis GM, Turner AWL, et al. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers. J Neurosurg Spine. (2012) 17(5):476–85. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.SPINE111121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shen F, Zhou B, Li Q, Li M, Wang Z, Li Q, et al. Posterior-only spinal release combined with derotation, translation, segmental correction, and an in situ rod-contouring technique for treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. (2015) 22(2):194–8. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE13690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Solla F, Clément JL, Cunin V, Bertoncelli CM, Fière V, Rampal V. Patient-specific rods for thoracic kyphosis correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: preliminary results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2020) 106(1):159–65. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sudo H, Tachi H, Kokabu T, Yamada K, Iwata A, Endo T, et al. In vivo deformation of anatomically pre-bent rods in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep. (2021) 11(1):12622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92187-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Tantorski M, Cahill P, Nydick J, Fine A, et al. Cervical sagittal plane decompensation after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an effect imparted by postoperative thoracic hypokyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine. (2011) 15(5):491–6. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE1012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yang C, Yang M, Wei X, Shao J, Chen Y, Zhao J, et al. Lumbar lordosis minus thoracic kyphosis: a novel regional predictor for sagittal balance in elderly populations. Spine. (2016) 41(5):399–403. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Liu H, Li Z, Li S, Zhang K, Yang H, Wang J, et al. Main thoracic curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: association of higher rod stiffness and concave-side pedicle screw density with improvement in sagittal thoracic kyphosis restoration. J Neurosurg Spine. (2015) 22(3):259–66. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE1496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sudo H, Abe Y, Kokabu T, Ito M, Abumi K, Ito YM, et al. Correlation analysis between change in thoracic kyphosis and multilevel facetectomy and screw density in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine J. (2016) 16(9):1049–54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lafage R, Steinberger J, Pesenti S, Assi A, Elysee JC, Iyer S, et al. Understanding thoracic spine morphology, shape, and proportionality. Spine. (2020) 45(3):149–57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Borkowski SL, Tamarazian E, Bowen RE, Scaduto AA, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN. Challenging the conventional standard for thoracic spine range of motion: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. (2016) 4(4):e5. 10.2106.JBJS.RVW.O.00048

Google Scholar

24. Sabah Y, Clément JL, Solla F, Rosello O, Rampal V. Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy rods provide similar coronal and sagittal correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2018) 104(7):1073–7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Bowden D, Michielli A, Merrill M, Will S. Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. (2022) 10(6):1245–63. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00537-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cheng MF, Ma H, Lin H, Chao H-H, Chou P-H, Wang S-T, et al. Anterior release may not be necessary for idiopathic scoliosis with a large curve of more than 75 degrees and a flexibility of less than 25. Spine J. (2018) 18(5):769–75. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rynearson B, Ramanathan R, Allen M, Wang X, Vaudreuil N, Bell KM, et al. Biomechanical analysis of wide posterior releases compared with inferior facetectomy and discectomy in the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine. Spine Deform. (2019) 7(3):404–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Namikawa T, Taneichi H, Inami S, Moridaira H, Takeuchi D, Shiba Y, et al. Multiple concave rib head resection improved correction rate of posterior spine fusion in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Sci. (2017) 22(3):415–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Feng J, Zhou J, Huang M, Xia P, Liu W. Clinical and radiological outcomes of the multilevel Ponte osteotomy with posterior selective segmental pedicle screw constructs to treat adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Surg Res. (2018) 13(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1001-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lewis SJ, Keshen SG, Kato S, Gazendam AM. Posterior versus three-column osteotomy for late correction of residual coronal deformity in patients with previous fusions for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. (2017) 5(3):189–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: thoracic kyphosis, posterior release, pre-contoured rod, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, spinal deformity

Citation: Shi J, Ordway NR, Sun MH, Albanese SA and Lavelle WF (2023) The effectiveness of pre-contoured titanium alloy rods in inducing thoracic kyphosis after sequential spinal releases in an in vitro biomechanical model. Front. Surg. 10:1064037. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1064037

Received: 7 October 2022; Accepted: 18 April 2023;
Published: 3 May 2023.

Edited by:

Yang Lv, Peking University Third Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Miao Yu, Peking University Third Hospital, China
Gregory Fabrice Jost, University of Basel, Switzerland
Virginie Lafage, Hospital for Special Surgery, United States

© 2023 Shi, Ordway, Sun, Albanese and Lavelle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: William F. Lavelle lavellew@upstate.edu; lavellwf@yahoo.com

Persent Address: Jinhui Shi, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Suzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.