Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Surg., 12 April 2022
Sec. Visceral Surgery
This article is part of the Research Topic Haemorrhoidal Disease: Old solutions and future perspectives View all 11 articles

Editorial: Haemorrhoidal Disease: Old Solutions and Future Perspectives

  • 1Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • 3Department of Surgery, Clinica Santa Rita, Vercelli, Italy
  • 4Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
  • 5Department of Surgery, School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 6Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands

Editorial on the Research Topic

Haemorrhoidal Disease: Old Solutions and Future Perspectives

Throughout our history haemorrhoidal disease (HD) has troubled humanity. HD is one of the best-described diseases in medical documentation and records date back to ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian times (1, 2). A ground for the abundance of antique references on HD could be the high prevalence of this disease, which has not changed over time. About one third of the population is affected by HD (3). Despite the widespread occurrence and an impressive amount of scientific research, the full picture of HD has not yet been grasped. This special issue aims to highlight several dynamically evolving domains in current HD research, ranging from historical viewpoints to technical solutions and patient involvement.

As we can read in the extensive historical overview by Pata et al., the surgical management of HD has altered over the past centuries. With the introduction of anaesthetics and antisepsis in the 19th century, surgery transformed from a butchering art to a modern science, broaching a whole new world of opportunities. Taking away the agony for an awake patient during an operation, most people were initially content with the possibility of performing surgery under general or epidural anaesthesia. However, nowadays, more and more studies show that there is a broad support base for local anaesthesia in HD operations. Colleagues Poskus et al. underline this view, showing local perianal anaesthetic infiltration to be safe and effective for anorectal surgery, with fewer postoperative complications and a reduction of costs. Likewise, Tomasicchio et al. state that a Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy performed under local anaesthesia and in an outpatient setting is not only successful but has a high patient satisfaction rate as well.

The treatment of HD is based on the severity of prolapse according to the Goligher grading, even if the latter is much debated due to the inappropriate consideration of the patient's symptoms and quality of life (46). For low grades, a stepwise approach is advised by Tutino et al., starting with sclerotherapy and – in case of relapse – rubber band ligation (RBL). Indeed, in recent years there has been a rise in the use of the former while rubber band is still the most common office-based procedure (7, 8).

For higher grades of HD, Giordano and Schembari describe a modification of the mucopexy and haemorrhoidal dearterialization by adding an anolift to address the prolapsing component in HD. Pietroletti et al. studied the efficacy of a new formulation in rectal cream, containing Zn-L-Carnosine, in relieving acute symptoms of HD. Zinc-L-Carnosine is a cytoprotective compound stimulating mucosal repair in the gastrointestinal tract and shows to be a safe and effective treatment for bleeding or thrombosed haemorrhoids.

Eberspacher et al. focus more on the process after the operation and introduce self-mechanical anal dilatation as a simple trick to minimize postoperative pain and stenosis after haemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency. The same author presents an in-depth analysis of the wall layers included in the stapled rectal ring of mucosectomies. In this article, Eberspacher et al. demonstrate that a mucosectomy entails a resection of the full rectal wall and that a “full-thickness” resection does not correlate with a higher rate of post-operative complications.

In line with the first treatment step for all grades of haemorrhoids, described in the European international guideline for HD (9), it is of paramount importance to optimize a patient’s lifestyle and to indicate risk factors. In the review by De Marco and Tiso, the authors stress the intake of adequate fluids, regular exercise, improving anal hygiene, and avoiding straining at stool.

Additionally, the authors mention the importance of good communication between the doctor and the patient, emphasizing on skilful listening. Understanding the disease-burden of a patient can assist in creating the best treatment approach. The usage of a patient-reported outcome (PROM) can be a valuable tool in this matter. Kuiper et al. evaluate the different PROMs available in the field of HD and endorse the use of such a tool in clinical practice to optimize personalized HD treatment (10, 11).

This special issue of Frontiers in Surgery on haemorrhoids addresses several topics including non-surgical solutions, technical operative aspects, and the involvement of patient’s experiences with HD. Despite the high incidence of this disabling disease, we know that the level of evidence of treatment remains low. To overcome this issue, a Core Outcome Set (COS) for HD can be utilized in clinical research (12, 13).

By using a COS, which is a minimal set of outcomes, study results can be easier compared to one another. Furthermore, the patient’s view should also be taken into account to ensure a patient tailored approach in the management of HD.

We encourage authors in the field of HD to continue their research to stimulate further discussion and understanding of haemorrhoids.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Holley CJ. History of hemorrhoidal surgery. South Med J. (1946) 39:536–41. doi: 10.1097/00007611-194607000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Parks AG. De haemorrhois; a study in surgical history. Guys Hosp Rep. (1955) 104(2):135–56.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

3. Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K, Riss T, Mittlbock M, Steiner G, et al. The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis. (2012) 27(2):215–20. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1316-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dekker L, Han-Geurts IJM, Grossi U, Gallo G, Veldkamp R. Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease? Tech Coloproctol. (In press). doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02591-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. (2020) 24(2):145–64. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02149-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH. Surgery of the anus, rectum, and colon. 3rd ed. London: Baillière Tindall (1975). viii, 1164 p., vi leaves of plates p.

7. Altomare DF, Picciariello A, Pecorella G, Milito G, Naldini G, Amato A, et al. Surgical management of haemorrhoids: an Italian survey of over 32 000 patients over 17 years. Colorectal Dis. (2018) 20(12):1117–24. doi: 10.1111/codi.14339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gallo G, Pietroletti R, Novelli E, Sturiale A, Tutino R, Lobascio P, et al. A multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using 3% polidocanol foam to treat second-degree haemorrhoids (SCLEROFOAM). Tech Coloproctol. (In press):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02609-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. van Tol RR, Kleijnen J, Watson AJM, Jongen J, Altomare DF, Qvist N, et al. European Society of ColoProctology: guideline for haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. (2020) 22(6):650–62. doi: 10.1111/codi.14975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rorvik HD, Styr K, Ilum L, McKinstry GL, Dragesund T, Campos AH, et al. Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD: new tools to evaluate symptoms and health-related quality of life in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. (2019) 62(3):333–42. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kuiper SZ, Kimman ML, Van Tol RR, Waardenburg SF, Van Kuijk SMJ, Dirksen CD, et al. Patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS): development, reliability and construct validity. Colorectal Dis. (In press). doi: 10.1111/codi.16079

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. van Tol RR, Kimman ML, Melenhorst J, Stassen LPS, Dirksen CD, Breukink SO, et al. European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals. Colorectal Dis. (2019) 21(5):570–80. doi: 10.1111/codi.14553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. van Tol RR, van Zwietering E, Kleijnen J, Melenhorst J, Stassen LPS, Dirksen CD, et al. Towards a core outcome set for hemorrhoidal disease-a systematic review of outcomes reported in literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. (2018) 33(7):849–56. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3046-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: haemorrhoidal disease, office-based procedures, conservative treatment, haemorrhoids, surgical treatment

Citation: Kuiper SZ, Gallo G, Trompetto M, Picciariello A and Breukink SO (2022) Editorial: Haemorrhoidal Disease: Old Solutions and Future Perspectives. Front. Surg. 9:905570. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.905570

Received: 27 March 2022; Accepted: 28 March 2022;
Published: 12 April 2022.

Edited by:

Ferdinand Köckerling, Vivantes Hospital, Germany

*Correspondence: Gaetano Gallo gaetano.gallo@unisi.it

Speciality section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Copyright Copyright © 2022 Kuiper, Gallo, Trompetto, Picciariello and Breukink. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.