The surgical strategy for multilevel massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments

Purpose: Creating enough decompression, favorable outcome, less complication, and maintain adequate lordosis and stability in the patients with cervical myelopathy due to multilevel massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) still poses a challenge for surgeons. The aim of our study is to retrospectively evaluate our patients and try to seek a better surgical strategy.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 55 consecutive patients with multilevel massive OPLL underwent surgical treatment. Among these, 40 patients were treated with cervical laminectomy and then anterior decompression, fusion, and fixation (ADF), which was defined as group 1, and 15 patients were treated with cervical laminectomy and fixation simultaneously, which was defined as group 2. The patient's radiographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Better postoperative cervical sagittal lordosis and less long-term axial pain was achieved in group 1 (p < 0.001), though the functional outcome had no significant difference. In the multivariable analysis, anterior fixation accounts for independent factors for better cervical sagittal alignment (p < 0.001). No complications directly associated with cervical laminectomy were observed.

Conclusion: In patients with cervical multilevel massive OPLL, laminectomy at compression level and then ADF depended on the severity and range of compression, but corpectomy of not more than two vertebral bodies is suggested, except K-line (+) and long-segment massive OPLL majorly involving the C2 and posterior laminectomy above and below the OPLL-affected levels with posterior fixation simultaneously.

Introduction

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is also an important pathology and is not a rare degenerative spine disease that causes neurologic dysfunction in middle-aged and elderly patients (1). As OPLL develops, patients with progressive degenerative cervical myelopathy (CM) require surgical treatment (2, 3). Surgical alternatives include anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior decompression and/or stabilization. However, the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical OPLL is a matter of debate, especially for multilevel compression and massive OPLL with a more than 60% canal occupying ratio (COR) (4). Posterior approach includes laminectomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion and fixation, is relatively simple, allows easier decompression of multiple levels, and has a low complication rate (5–10). However, the effect of indirect decompression of the spinal cord by posterior decompression is limited for patients with severe kyphotic deformity and/or massive OPLL (2, 3, 11–14). Even more, posterior laminoplasty in patients who have massive OPLL with a ≥50% COR can result in poorer outcomes compared with anterior decompression and fusion with fixation (ADF) (15, 16). ADF, including cervical multilevel corpectomy or discectomy, can provide direct decompression to the spinal cord, can maintain suitable alignment of the spine, and can stabilize the involved segments (2, 3, 17). Several studies have reported that the postoperative neurologic recovery rate is similar in patients who accepted ADF and posterior decompression and fusion with fixation (PDF), but ADF is superior to PDF in patients with kyphotic alignment and higher COR. The advantages of ADF include better radiographic outcomes and faster neurological recovery rates (2, 11, 15). However, the ADF has a high complication rate (18, 19), is technically demanding, and has limitations in cases with multilevel OPLL or OPLL majorly involving the C2. In a recent review, ADF is considered for K-line (−) regardless of canal occupying ratio, and K-line (+) and COR >60% for OPLL patients. Posterior approach is considered for patients with multilevel compressive myelopathy, K-line (+), and COR < 50%–60% for OPLL (20, 21). However, there is higher graft dislodgement to perform multilevel ADF (22), poor decompression effect on OPLL majorly involving the C2, and relative difficulty in correcting the kyphotic alignment for performing PDF in these OPLL patients. Although posterior laminectomy, ADF, and then posterior fixation could provide safe decompression, cervical realignment, and favorable outcomes, and less long-term complication in the patients with cervical multilevel OPLL with kyphotic deformity and higher COR (23, 24), little case numbers and higher short-term morbidity is still worth to be concerned. Whether there is the simpler but still safe and effective surgical strategy for cervical multilevel OPLL with kyphotic deformity and higher COR.

In this study, we analyzed our cases with cervical multilevel OPLL with kyphotic deformity and higher COR, compared the functional outcomes and complication between laminectomy with ADF and PDF, and try to seek a better surgical strategy.

Material and method

Patients

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB: 202000602B0). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. The OPLL diagnosis was confirmed by experienced radiologist. Inclusion criteria were (1) cervical compressive myelopathy with/without radiculopathy emanating from OPLL and involving more than three vertebrae, and (2) a maximal COR of more than 60% (11), which was defined as multilevel massive cervical OPLL (Figures 1, 2). Exclusion criteria included cases combined with fracture, significant congenital cervical anatomic deformity, or follow-up periods of less than 1 year. From January 2016 to December 2019, 55 patients (41 men and 14 women) were eligible for final analysis.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. A 63-year-old male with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL over C3-6 underwent C3-6 laminectomy followed by anterior C4-5 and C5-6 microdiscectomy and C5 corpectomy, and C4-6 interbody fusion and internal fixation. (A) Preoperative cervical MRI showed severe cervical stenosis with bulging disc. (B) Preoperative cervical MRI axial view showed >60% canal occupying ratio. (C) Preoperative cervical x-ray showed cervical lordosis about 2.1°. (D) Postoperative cervical x-ray showed cervical lordosis about 4.7°.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. A 51-year-old male with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL over C2-7 underwent C2-7 laminectomy and C2–T2 fixation: (A) preoperative cervical MRI showed severe cervical stenosis with bulging disc. (B) Preoperative cervical MRI axial view showed >60% canal occupying ratio. (C) Preoperative cervical x-ray showed cervical lordosis about 18.6°. (D) Postoperative cervical x-ray showed cervical lordosis about 10°.

In our department, we managed patients with multilevel massive OPLL according to K-line (+) or (−) and whether involving the C2. On this view, the K-line was drawn from the midpoint of the spinal canal at C2 to the midpoint of the spinal canal at C7 (25). If K-line (+) and massive OPLL majorly involved the C2, posterior laminectomy above and below the OPLL-affected levels with posterior fixation and fusion with autograft bone harvested from the resected spinal process was done simultaneously (PDF), and facetectomy was done only done at fixation levels. If postoperative residual symptoms compared with inadequate decompression at canal or neuroforamen on a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were encountered, selective discectomy with interbody fusion and without fixation were performed. If K-line (−) occurred, laminectomy was performed at the compression level followed by corpectomy with or without discectomy, along with fixation and fusion (ADF) at one stage or on the day between postoperative first and second weeks. Corpectomy was done at major involving levels, but not more than two vertebral bodies, and then a wedge allograft was placed with autograft cancellous bone harvested from the resected vertebral bodies under distraction to create lordosis. For rigid or auto-fused segments with continuous OPLL or inadequate decompression by laminectomy in adjacent level(s), discectomy with removal of OPLL mass as much as possible with a high-speed burr for decompression was performed to break the OPLL mass. If anterior plate failure, screw loosening, graft subsidence, or dislodgement was noted at follow-up x-rays, posterior fixation and fusion with autograft bone harvested from the resected spinal process was done. Laminectomy followed by ADF or PDF depended on the decision of surgeons if K-line (+) or not majorly involving the C2.

Among these cases, 40 patients were treated with laminectomy followed by ADF, which was defined as group 1 (Figure 1), and 15 patients were treated with PDF, which was defined as group 2 (Figure 2). From these charts records, the following data were collected: name of the surgeon, patients’ demographics (age and gender), preoperative diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative images, decompression and fixation level, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) (26) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) (27, 28), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss. All surgeons were well trained and had at least 3 years of experience. In the preoperative and postoperative 1-year C2–C7 Cobb's angle on upright cervical spine lateral x-rays, the presence of cervical kyphosis (total curvature: straight: −4 to +4, lordosis: less than −4, kyphosis: more than +4) was measured (Figures 1, 2). Postoperative 1-year x-rays were also used to evaluate the position of the implant and whether graft subsidence occurred.

Statistical analysis

The differences between the different groups were tested for significance using the Student’s t test for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical characteristics and outcomes were performed. Contingency statistics on categorical variables were performed with Fisher's exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was prospectively determined to establish statistical significance. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25.

Results

Radiographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes

There were no significant demographic differences between the groups, as listed in Table 1. There was no statistical difference in the preoperative mean sagittal alignment degree (lordosis curve) (p = 0.549) and in the preoperative VAS score (p = 0.052). However, there was a significant difference in the postoperative cervical lordosis degree and postoperative 3-month VAS between the two groups (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively; Table 2). The JOACMEQ scores were not different in the two groups measured preoperatively or postoperatively (p = 0.369 and p = 0.062, respectively; Table 2). The degree of lordosis curve angle measured at postoperative 1-year C-spine lateral view in group 1 significantly improved compared with the degree measured preoperatively in group 1 (mean: 7.51 vs. 13.17, p < 0.001) and worse in group 2, but there was no significant difference (mean: 5.58 vs. 3.46, p < 0.176; Table 2). The postoperative VAS significantly improved than the preoperative VAS in the two groups (p < 0.001; Table 2). The postoperative JOACMEQ significantly improved than the preoperative one in group 1 (p < 0.001) and slightly worse than in group 2 (p = 0.164; Table 2).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics and radiographic characteristics of 55 patients with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL undergoing cervical operation.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Postoperative outcomes of 55 patients with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL undergoing cervical operation.

Factors related to cervical sagittal alignment

Tables 3, 4 show the results of univariate and multivariate analyses about the impact factors that contribute to cervical sagittal alignment including the clinical data, image signs, and way of approach. The improvement of postoperative cervical lordosis was not significantly associated with age, decompression level below C6 and involvement of C6, number of decompression level, and preoperative C2–C7 Cobb's angle in the univariate logistic regression analysis. On the other hand, the presence of a better cervical sagittal alignment was more likely associated with anterior fixation (OR: 28; 95% CI: 5.8–135.176; p < 0.001, univariate logistic regression). In the multivariable analysis, anterior fixation accounts for independent factors for better cervical sagittal alignment (Table 4).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Predictors of better postoperative cervical lordosis in univariate analysis.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Multivariable analysis of better posterior cervical lordosis.

Complications following two different approaches

The immediate postoperative and long-term complication rates are listed in Table 5; there are three patients (5.4%) with neurologic deficits and two patients (5%) in group 1, and one patient (6.7%) in group 2. One patient had posterior spinal cord epidural hematoma in group 1, who had salvage operation for removal of epidural hematoma. The patient had full recovery with no decrease in muscle power but still had some numbness as a preoperative condition over bilateral upper limb after 1 year rehabilitation. Two patients had postoperative four limbs muscle power decreased to grade 3 from grade 5 but no obvious somatosensory evoked potential change during intraoperative monitor, and they were highly suspected reperfusion of injury related after decompression (29), who gradually recovered to muscle power grade 4–5 after 3 months rehabilitation. Three patients (5.5%) had postoperative infection and two patients were in group 2. Two patients had gastrointestinal bleeding, which were highly suspected steroid related. In group 1, one patient had C5 palsy and another had mild graft subsidence at the 1-year follow-up and needed remedial surgery with posterior fixation and fusion. There were no patients with intraoperative shock, pulmonary embolism, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, death, graft dislodgement, new onset subluxation, plate failure, or screws loosening during the 1-year follow-up.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Postoperative complications of 55 patients with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL undergoing cervical operation.

Discussion

Strategy for cervical myelopathy due to multilevel massive OPLL

The surgical treatment of multilevel massive OPLL is a highly controversial issue; previous studies have mainly focused on the comparison outcome and complication between ADF and PDF procedures (2–4, 7, 11–15, 18–20). Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages. Based on neurologic outcomes, ADF is considered for K-line (−) regardless of COR and K-line (+) and COR > 60% for patients with OPLL, which leads to a higher surgical trauma and incidence of surgery-related complications, such as CSF leakage, dysphagia, or hoarseness; PDF is considered for patients with multilevel compressive myelopathy, K-line (+), and COR < 50%–60% for patients with OPLL, which is relatively safer with lower surgical trauma and incidence of complications, such as C5 palsy and axial pain (3, 9, 14, 20, 21). The advantages of ADF are direct removal of offending pathologies from the front side of the dura and reconstruction of the anterior column of the cervical spine to maintain cervical lordosis and sagittal balance. In addition, ADF of more than two or three levels in patients with multiple massive OPLL would require additional posterior fusion with/without decompression to avoid graft-related complications such as dislodgement, subsidence, and pseudarthrosis (3, 24, 28).

A two-stage [posterior and anterior–posterior (P-AP) 540°] procedure could provide safe decompression, cervical realignment, and favorable outcomes for extensive cervical OPLL with kyphotic deformity (23). It is worth to concern about soft tissue and muscle damage via multiple P-AP approaches within 1-week period, such as dysphagia.

For those patients with multilevel massive OPLL or OPLL majorly involving the C2, our study proves that our protocol is safe, effective, and has few complications. So, we suggested the following:

1. If K-line (+) and multilevel massive OPLL majorly involves the C2, posterior laminectomy above and below the OPLL-affected levels with posterior fixation simultaneously is considered first.

2. For other multilevel massive OPLL, regardless of K-line (−) or (+), laminectomy at compression level followed by ADF depended on the severity and range of compression, but corpectomy of not more than two vertebral bodies on the day between postoperative first and second weeks is considered first.

Compared with PDF, our results showed that laminectomy and then ADF (corpectomy of two or less levels) for cervical multilevel massive OPLL resulted in a better postoperative cervical lordosis curve, less postoperative pain, and better JOACMEQ score, with equal postoperative complications.

Postoperative outcome and complications

Compared with PDF (group 2), laminectomy followed by ADF (group 1) has the better postoperative 1-year lordosis curve, less axial pain, and better JOACMEQ score, with equal postoperative complications. All patients have better postoperative VAS than preoperative VAS in the two groups (p < 0.001), although postoperative cervical lordosis is worse compared to preoperative in group 2. However, the postoperative VAS in group 1 is significantly better than that of group 2 (p < 0.001), and it might be associated with the improvement in postoperative lordosis. Decompression of the neural elements could improve pain caused by myeloradiculopathy, and re-establishment of regional cervical alignment could improve axial neck pain. It had been reported that patients feel less neck tenderness after operation treated with ADF in CM with multilevel massive OPLL (4).

Neurologic deficits after laminectomy are the major complications including one patient with postoperative spinal epidural hematoma and two patients with reperfusion injury, which is characterized as unexplained new neurological deficits after an anterior or posterior decompressive cervical procedure and the radiographic hallmark is the presence of hyperintense T2 intramedullary signal change after a decompressive procedure without other pathologic changes (29). Plate or screws loosening, graft subsidence, or new onset subluxation at 1-year follow-up did not occur in any patient. Exceptions were minimal complications including three patients with infection and two patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, but they recovered well after medication. Both groups had a low complication rate.

Factors related to cervical sagittal alignment

After anterior and posterior decompression, cervical sagittal alignment improved (23). Thus, we can easily manipulate and expand the disc space with retraction screws to gain more lordosis, and then insert the adequate expander or graft and fixation to treat cervical lordosis. On the other hand, PDF might limit the mobility and the extensible range due to head-pin fixation and limited decompression.

We also tried to seek other impact factors of cervical sagittal lordosis; however, only the procedure with posterior decompression followed by ADF (group 1) had a significant impact in our univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariable analysis. Factors such as “Preop C2–C7 Cobb's angle” have no influence on postoperative cervical lordosis. It could be explained by the fact that some kyphotic patients might gain more lordosis curve after the operation in our study. The similar concept on cervical myelopathy without OPLL patients was reported that preoperatively kyphotic patients benefitted more from surgery than lordotic patients (30).

Limitation

Selection bias and lack of randomization could be anticipated in this retrospective study. Furthermore, the role of CM due to multiple massive OPLL is relatively strict and it limits our case number. A well-designed prospective validation in independent cohorts is needed to establish the ideal surgical strategy for multilevel massive and extensive OPLL.

Conclusion

There is still no standard surgical guideline to manage cervical myelopathy due to long-segment massive OPLL, but we offer a safe and effective protocol. For patients with long-segment massive OPLL, regardless of the canal occupying ratio and K-line (−) or (+), we suggest laminectomy at compression level followed by ADF depending on the severity and range of compression or corpectomy of not more than three vertebral levels on the same day or within 2 weeks. For the patients with K-line (+) and massive OPLL involving the C2, we suggest posterior laminectomy above and below the OPLL-affected levels with posterior fixation simultaneously. In addition, we also demonstrated that cervical laminectomy followed by ADF could get enough decompression, minimalize the neurologic complication, get better cervical lordosis, and have less long-term axial pain in patients with CM due to long-segment massive OPLL.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

Y-CL, Z-HL, and Y-SL contributed to the conception and design of the study. M-CY and Y-TL performed the statistical analysis. Y-CL and P-HT wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Y-CH, C-CC, and P-HT organized the database. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Matsunaga S, Kukita M, Hayashi K, Shinkura R, Koriyama C, Sakou T, et al. Pathogenesis of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg. (2002) 96:168–72. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.2.0168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine. (2007) 32:654–60. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257566.91177.cb

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 1: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine. (2007) 32:647–53. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257560.91147.86

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T, Yamada T, Inose H, Kato T, et al. Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study. Spine J. (2016) 16:1351–7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Midorikawa H, Ogawa T, Satou K, Hoshino S, Takase S, Yokoyama H. Long-term results of endoluminal grafting for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2005) 53:295–301. doi: 10.1007/s11748-005-0131-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Singhatanadgige W, Limthongkul W, Valone F III, Yingsakmongkol W, Riew KD. Outcomes following laminoplasty or laminectomy and fusion in patients with myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review. Global Spine J. (2016) 6:702–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1578805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Feng F, Ruan W, Liu Z, Li Y, Cai L. Anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. (2016) 27:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ziu M, Dengler B, Cordell D, Bartanusz V. Diagnosis and management of primary pyogenic spinal infections in intravenous recreational drug users. Neurosurg Focus. (2014) 37:E3. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cardoso MJ, Koski TR, Ganju A, Liu JC. Approach-related complications after decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurg Focus. (2011) 30:E12. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine. (2012) 37:E303–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239cca0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H. Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. (2002) 27:2491–8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Liu T, Xu W, Cheng T, Yang HL. Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. (2011) 20:224–35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1486-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Takenaka S, Kashii M, Kaito T, et al. Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine. (2014) 39:58–67. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, et al. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. (2007) 20:7–13. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211260.28497.35

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M, Arai Y, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, et al. Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty. Spine. (2012) 37:367–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821f4a51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M, Yasuda T, Seki S, Hori T, Kimura T. Anterior decompressive surgery after cervical laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. (2014) 14:955–63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chen Y, Sun J, Yuan X, Guo Y, Yang H, Chen D, et al. Comparison of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion with posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective, randomized, and control study with at least 1-year follow up. Spine. (2020) 45:1091–101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yoshii T, Egawa S, Hirai T, Kaito T, Mori K, Koda M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Orthop Sci. (2020) 25:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Qin R, Chen X, Zhou P, Li M, Hao J, Zhang F. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. (2018) 27:1375–87. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kwok SSS, Cheung JPY. Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2020) 21:823. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03830-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nori S, Aoyama R, Ninomiya K, Suzuki S, Anazawa U, Shiraishi T. Does K-line (-) in the neck-flexed position predict surgical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? results of a multivariate analysis after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy. Spine. (2020) 45:E1225–31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Schultz KD J, McLaughlin MR, Haid RW Jr., Comey CH, Rodts GE Jr., Alexander J. Single-stage anterior-posterior decompression and stabilization for complex cervical spine disorders. J Neurosurg. (2000) 93:214–21. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lee DH, Joo YS, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Cho JH. A novel technique to correct kyphosis in cervical myelopathy due to continuous-type ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine. (2017) 26:325–30. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lee SH, Kim KT, Lee JH, Kang KC, Jang SJ, Hwang SP, et al. 540 Degrees cervical realignment procedure for extensive cervical OPLL with kyphotic deformity. Spine. (2016) 41:1876–83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001794

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, Endo T, Furuya T, Koda M, et al. A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine. (2008) 33:E990–3. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188b300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shin YJ, Kim WH, Kim SG. Correlations among visual analogue scale, neck disability index, shoulder joint range of motion, and muscle strength in young women with forward head posture. J Exerc Rehabil. (2017) 13:413–7. doi: 10.12965/jer.1734956.478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci. (2008) 13:25–31. doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1194-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item. J Orthop Sci. (2007) 12:241–8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1119-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mathkour M, Werner C, Riffle J, Scullen T, Dallapiazza RF, Dumont A, et al. Reperfusion “white cord'‘ syndrome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: does mean arterial pressure goal make a difference? Additional case and literature review. World Neurosurg. (2020) 137:194–9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Koeppen D, Piepenbrock C, Kroppenstedt S, Cabraja M. The influence of sagittal profile alteration and final lordosis on the clinical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A Delta-Omega-analysis. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0174527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar