Jihua Tian
Li Zhang1†
Xing Zeng
Chunguang Yang
Zhiquan Hu- 1Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- 2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- 3Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Masses of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are very diverse, most of which are thrombus and tumor thrombus, whereas heterotopic ossification of IVC has never been reported. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of mature lamellar bone outside normal bones and in soft tissues. Some researchers believe that HO is a manifestation of vascular calcification. Here we present a case of HO of the inferior vena cava (IVC) wall. A 68 year old female patient complaining hypertension and palpitation and diagnosed with a retroperitoneal mass was found to have a primary mass of the inferior vena cava wall during surgery. Histopathological examination after surgical resection revealed that the mass was mainly composed of mature bone tissues and hematopoietic tissues of bone marrow, there was no recurrence and the patient was symptom-free 15 months after the surgery. HO of the inferior vena cava wall is very rare, with large volume it can affect the circulation, and this case remind us that it can be cured by surgical resection.
Introduction
Inferior vena cava (IVC) mass is a rare disease with a wide variety of histology and sources. Based on previous literature, IVC masses include thrombus, secondary tumor thrombus, and intravenous leiomyomatosis, primary IVC leiomyosarcoma, IVC phleboliths. The primary lesions of tumor thrombus can be from kidney, liver, and adrenal glands (1–5). Heterotopic ossification (HO) of IVC has not been reported before. Here we report a case of HO in the IVC that was diagnosed as a retroperitoneal mass before surgery, together with a literature review of HO and IVC masses.
Case Presentation
A 68 year old female patient went to her local hospital due to elevated blood pressure. The patient had paroxysmal hypertension with palpitation in recent years. The highest blood pressure was 200/110 mmHg. No history of trauma or interventional examination, and no history of injuries of the cord spine. Laboratory examination show serum calcium: 2.31 mmol/L, eGFR 90.7 ml/min/1.73 m2. A CT scan of the abdomen during hospitalization revealed irregular hyperintensity shadows in the inferior vena cava area and it was diagnosed as a retroperitoneal mass. The patient came to Wuhan Tongji Hospital in December 2019. Abdominal CT enhancement scan showed a mixed density image of about 22*28 mm in the IVC area and below the right renal vein, contained calcification and fatty density (Figure 1A). It was considered to be a retroperitoneal neoplasm compress the inferior vena cava. Later, the patient underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal exploration, and it was found that the mass originated from the wall of the IVC. After conversion to open surgery (Figure 1B), we resected the mass and partial IVC wall adhered to the mass (Figure 1C), then repair the IVC wall with an extended polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The operation lasted 320 min. The patient started receiving low-molecular-weight heparin sodium treatment on the second day after surgery. The patient recovered and leave hospital 7 days after surgery.
Figure 1. (A) Abdominal CT enhancement scan showed a mixed density image of about 22 * 28 mm in the IVC area with calcification and fatty density images [The lesion was indicated by the arrow in (A–C)]. (B) The mass originated from the wall of the IVC. (C) The mass had been removed, and the inferior vena cava was open and remains to be sutured. (D) The tumor was 2.5 cm in size, gray-red in color, solid and hard in texture. (E) Histopathological examination showed that mature bone fragmentation, hematopoietic tissue of bone marrow, and some free wall-like tissues were mainly seen under the microscope. (F) Immunohistochemical test showed positive ERG.
On naked eye examination, the tumor was 2.5 cm in size, gray-red in color, solid and hard in texture (Figure 1D). Histopathological examination showed that mature bone fragmentation, hematopoietic tissue of bone marrow, and some free wall-like tissues were mainly seen under the microscope. Smooth muscle tissue was found in some of the wall-like tissues, of which there were two small pieces of tissue containing more epithelioid cells. Cytoplasmic vacuoles (immunophenotype suggests vascular endothelium) with interstitial hyaline degeneration which consistent with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma was also found in it (Figures 1E,F). Immunohistochemistry showed that epithelioid cells CD34, ERG, FL11, CD31 were positive. PCK, EMA, E-cad, TFE-3 were negative. Ki67 LI was about 2%. At the 15 month follow-up, CT scan showed there was no recurrence and the patient was symptom-free.
Discussion
Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of mature lamellar bone outside normal bones. At present, HO is generally considered as a complication after trauma, burns and nerve injury. The incidence of HO is 0.2–4% after burns, 10–53% after injury of the cord spine, and jumped to 90% after certain types of hip replacement or acetabular fractures (6–8). It is currently believed that the existence of osteoblast precursor cells, inducing factors, and appropriate microenvironment are the three conditions that must exist for the formation of HO (9). The origin of HO cell remains unclear. The research of D. Medici et.al have implicated vascular endothelial cells might be a potential source for HO progenitors (10).
Venous ossification is more special and rarer than ossification in other organs or tissues, and there are abundant studies shown that vascular calcification is a form of heterotopic ossification (11). Schmid et al. (12) Found that besides calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite is also a mineral deposit in the atherosclerotic aorta. Then matrix vesicles were identified in calcified aortas, and microvascular pericytes were found to produce mineralized matrix in vivo (13). Later, BMP-2 was found expressing in calcified arteries (14). Some researchers found that calcified valves and vessels contain architecturally complex trabecular bone (15–18). These findings suggested that vascular calcification have same mechanism with osteogenic.
The clinical symptoms caused by HO in different tissues are variant. HO in the joint area can be presented as joint motion limitation (19), when it occurs to deep soft tissues such as muscles, compression symptoms can be manifested (20). When the mesentery is involved, it can show small bowel obstruction, symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and bloating (21). In this case, the main symptoms were elevated blood pressure and palpitation, which might be related to compression of the IVC by the mass (22, 23).
HO of IVC could be misdiagnosed as many other diseases and requires careful identification. The histology and source of IVC masses are very diverse, their imaging findings varies, and their clinical manifestations are similar. Patients with IVC thrombus usually have congenital IVC abnormalities and deep vein thrombous of the lower extremity. Generally, patients with lower risk of deep vein thrombous of the lower extremity can exclude IVC thrombus (23). IVC leiomyomatosis mostly occurs in premenopausal women, often with uterine fibroids or a history of fibroid surgery. IVC leiomyomatosis caused by invasion of uterine fibroid cells. The tumor extends from the small vein to the IVC and even the right atrium. manifests as the disappearance of the flow-void signs in MR, and show different levels of uneven enhancement in enhanced scans (1). IVC leiomyosarcoma is more common in middle-aged women. The tumor originates from venous smooth muscle. CT can distinguish IVC leiomyosarcoma from IVC HO (24). The primary tumor can be found in all cases with IVC tumor thrombus, and it is not difficult to distinguish it from HO of IVC (3, 4). IVC Phleboliths are also very rare. Only one case is reported so far. Compared with IVC HO, venous stones are relatively regular in high density under CT and only adhere to the wall of the inferior vena cava (25). In addition to the lesions in the IVC wall and the lumen of the IVC, IVC HO also needs to be distinguished from retroperitoneal tumors that compress the IVC. Webb, E.M. founds that the disappearance of the inferior vena cava wall at the junction of the inferior vena cava and the tumor is an important indicator of the tumor's IVC origin (26).
Masses in the inferior vena cava are usually surgically removed or removed together with partial wall of the vena cava, especially for benign lesions, which can hopefully be cured. In this case, surgery was selected because the lesions were limited and the boundary were clear, and it had achieved favorable results.
Conclusions
Ossification of IVC wall is a rare disease that has not been reported yet. Its pathological mechanism is related to heterotopic ossification and vascular calcification. Although it is a benign disease, it can affect patient's circulatory system if a large mass was formed, for single lesions with clear boundaries indicated by imaging examination, surgical resection can achieve good results.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Medical Ethical Committee of Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
JT: writing-original draft and software. LZ: writing-review and editing, and supervision. MH: software and surgery. XZ: surgery and supervision. YW: review and editing. CY: surgery, funding acquisition, and writing-review and editing. ZH: surgery, project administration, and resources. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81702989).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Yang C, Fang H, Yang Y, Cai F, Zheng H, Jin B, et al. Diagnosis and surgical management of inferior vena cava leiomyomatosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. (2018) 6:636–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.03.013
2. Stein PD, Matta F, Yaekoub AY. Incidence of vena cava thrombosis in the United States. Am J Cardiol. (2008) 102:927–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.046
3. Sakamoto K, Nagano H. Outcomes of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava or right atrium. Surg Today. (2018) 48:819–24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1619-2
4. Wang B, Li H, Huang Q, Liu K, Fan Y, Peng C, et al. Robot-assisted retrohepatic inferior vena cava thrombectomy: first or second porta hepatis as an important boundary landmark. Eur Urol. (2018) 74:512–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.017
5. Hollenbeck ST, Grobmyer SR, Kent KC, Brennan MF. Surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma. J Am Coll Surgeons. (2003) 197:575–9. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00433-2
6. Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut JL, Ashe MC, Sequeira K, Macaluso S, et al. A systematic review of the therapeutic interventions for heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. (2010) 48:512–21. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.175
7. Chen H, Yang J, Chuang S, Huang C, Yang S. Heterotopic ossification in burns: our experience and literature reviews. Burns. (2009) 35:857–62. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.03.002
8. Maender C, Sahajpal D, Wright TW. Treatment of heterotopic ossification of the elbow following burn injury: recommendations for surgical excision and perioperative prophylaxis using radiation therapy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. (2010) 19:1269–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.029
9. Lewis PC, Camou E, Wofford K. The impact of cigarette smoking on the formation of heterotopic ossification among service members with a traumatic amputation. Mil Med. (2017) 182:e1742–8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00350
10. Medici D, Shore EM, Lounev VY, Kaplan FS, Kalluri R, Olsen BR. Conversion of vascular endothelial cells into multipotent stem-like cells. Nat Med. (2010) 16:1400–6. doi: 10.1038/nm.2252
11. Fuery MA, Liang L, Kaplan FS, Mohler ERR. Vascular ossification: pathology, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Bone. (2018) 109:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.006
12. Schmid K, McSharry WO, Pameijer CH, Binette JP. Chemical and physicochemical studies on the mineral deposits of the human atherosclerotic aorta. Atherosclerosis. (1980) 37:199–210. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(80)90005-2
13. Schor AM, Allen TD, Canfield AE, Sloan P, Schor SL. Pericytes derived from the retinal microvasculature undergo calcification in vitro. J Cell Sci. (1990) 97:449–61. doi: 10.1242/jcs.97.3.449
14. Boström K, Watson KE, Horn S, Wortham C, Herman IM, Demer LL. Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. (1993) 91:1800–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI116391
15. Mohler ERR, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG, Kaplan FS. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation. (2001) 103:1522–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.11.1522
16. Hunt JL, Fairman R, Mitchell ME, Carpenter JP, Golden M, Khalapyan T, et al. Bone formation in carotid plaques: a clinicopathological study. Stroke. (2002) 33:1214–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000013741.41309.67
17. Jeziorska M, McCollum C, Wooley DE. Observations on bone formation and remodelling in advanced atherosclerotic lesions of human carotid arteries. Virchows Archiv. (1998) 433:559–65. doi: 10.1007/s004280050289
18. Soor GS, Vukin I, Leong SW, Oreopoulos G, Butany J. Peripheral vascular disease: who gets it and why? a histomorphological analysis of 261 arterial segments from 58 cases. Pathology. (2008) 40:385–91. doi: 10.1080/00313020802036764
19. Ranganathan K, Loder S, Agarwal S, Wong VW, Forsberg J, Davis TA, et al. Heterotopic ossification: basic-science principles and clinical correlates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2015) 97:1101–11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01056
20. Gutknecht DR. Heterotopic ossification and deep venous thrombosis: Concurrence (?). bleeding complications, and caval interruption. South Med J. (1992) 85:1244–6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199212000-00021
21. Ferreira C, Gomes C, Melo A, Tenreiro N, Pinto B, Moreira H, et al. Heterotopic mesenteric and abdominal wall ossification - two case reports in one institution. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2017) 37:22–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.06.004
22. Bednarova I, Frellesen C, Roman A, Vogl TJ. Case 257: leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava. Radiology. (2018) 288:901–8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018160821
23. Alkhouli M, Morad M, Narins CR, Raza F, Bashir R. Inferior vena cava thrombosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 9:629–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.268
24. Teixeira FJRJ, do Couto Netto SD, Perina ALDF, Torricelli FCM, Ragazzo Teixeira L, Zerati AE, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: survival rate following radical resection. Oncol Lett. (2017) 14:3909–16. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6706
25. Soga Y, Kira H, Wakamiya M, Manabe N, Su T, Doi K, et al. Calcified masses in the inferior vena cava. Circ J. (2018) 83:239–40. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1094
Keywords: inferior vena cava (IVC), heterotopic ossification, retroperitoneum, mass, surgical resection
Citation: Tian J, Zhang L, Hu M, Zeng X, Wang Y, Yang C and Hu Z (2021) Heterotopic Ossification of the Inferior Vena Cava Wall: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front. Surg. 8:738934. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.738934
Received: 09 July 2021; Accepted: 04 November 2021;
Published: 02 December 2021.
Edited by:
Alan R. Davis, Baylor College of Medicine, United StatesReviewed by:
Mojahid Najem, Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, United KingdomGasbarro Vincenzo, University of Ferrara, Italy
Copyright © 2021 Tian, Zhang, Hu, Zeng, Wang, Yang and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chunguang Yang, cgyang-hust@hotmail.com; Zhiquan Hu, huzhiquan2000@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work