Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 03 December 2020
Sec. Thoracic Surgery

Case Report: A Malignant Liver and Thoracic Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A 10-Year Journey From the Brain to the Liver and the Spine

\nMin Mao&#x;Min MaoLei Zhou&#x;Lei ZhouChaojun HuangChaojun HuangXudong YanXudong YanShuo HuShuo HuHuabin YinHuabin YinQinghua ZhaoQinghua ZhaoDianwen Song
Dianwen Song*
  • Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Solitary fibrous tumors are rare neoplasms that originate from mesenchymal tissues and have been found to occur in any site, including the spine and liver. Although most of solitary fibrous tumors have benign features, only 10–20% are malignant and prone to metastasis. No previous reports have described the malignant and metastatic Solitary fibrous tumor arising in both of the liver and thoracic vertebrae. In this article, we present the case of a 60-year-old woman who underwent gross total resection of a meningeal tumor in 2007. She presented 10 years later with a thoracic vertebral mass that caused relentless pain and a lesion in the right lobe of liver. She underwent marginal excision of the T3 tumor with T2-4 pedicular screw fixation in March 2017, then right hemi-hepatectomy was performed to remove the liver lesion in June 2017. Both of the lesions were confirmed to be a metastatic and malignant tumor after surgery. The literature lacks randomized controlled trials and large studies that define the natural history of malignant solitary fibrous tumors and recommendations of precise management plan for the disease. However, the best choice for treatment is gross total resection, which probably provide the optimal treatment to achieve long-term disease-free survival.

Introduction

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors derived from mesenchymal tissues and were first reported by Klemperer and Rabin in 1931 (1). Although SFTs mainly occur in the pleura, a few cases have been reported occurred in extra pleural organs, including the spine (24). According to World Health Organization classification of the central nervous system in 2016, SFTs and hemangiopericytomas were classified as the same tumor (5). However, to the best of our knowledge, SFTs located in the spine are relatively rare and were first reported by Carneiro et al. (6). SFTs can occur throughout the spine, and the thoracic segment (56.3%) represents the main lesion sites. Although most SFTs are benign and slow-growing, 10–20% of SFTs are malignant (7, 8). Unlike benign SFTs, malignant SFTs behave more aggressively, have a symptomatic presentation, are more likely to recur and metastasize and have a poor prognosis. Metastases to the spine from meningeal SFT are very rare. In this report, we report the rare case of meningeal SFT that metastasized to the thoracic spine and liver 10 years after the initial diagnosis.

Case Report

The patient is a 60-year-old woman who presented to our hospital with new-onset upper back pain. The patient complained of upper back pain for 6 months accompanied by left intercostal neuralgia, which was refractory to analgesic treatment. The patient underwent gross total resection of a meningeal tumor 10 years ago. The pathology result was a hemangiopericytoma with a high proliferation index that was classified as WHO grade 2. The patient received twenty-seven cycles of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection. Then, the patient had an excellent post-operative course, and yearly follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans confirmed a complete resection and no recurrence of the tumor until March 2017. Ten years after resection of the meningeal tumor, her upper back pain started. First of all, the patient admitted to another hospital, the positron emission tomography/computed-tomography (PET-CT) showed the lesion at the left T3 vertebral body and in the right lobe of the liver without other sites metastasis. The diagnosis of metastatic SFT was suggested by immunohistochemistry of the T3 mass after CT-guided percutaneous thoracic puncture biopsy was performed. The immunohistochemical study demonstrated CD34(+) and STAT6(++). Then, abdominal and thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. The abdominal MRI revealed an enhanced lesion in the right lobe of the liver, with a size of ~2.7 × 2.8 × 3 cm (Figures 1A,B). The patient complained of no discomfort in the abdomen and did not present with jaundice. The thoracic MRI showed an expansive intraosseous mass at the left T3 vertebral body. The bony mass expanded along the left of the T3 vertebral body, with retropulsion toward the spinal canal and compression of the spinal cord at this level (Figures 2A–C). The thoracic CT scans showed that the size of the lesion to the left of the T3 vertebral body was ~3.7 × 5.3 cm (Figures 2D–F). The Tomita score was 4, and the Tokuhashi score was 9–11, indicating long-term control requiring wide or marginal excision. On the basis of these findings, the surgical plan included marginal excision of the T3 tumor with T2-4 pedicular screw fixation (Figure 4A). The surgery was performed smoothly without complications or significant blood loss. The preoperative symptom of back pain was relieved, and a radiograph of the thoracic spine showed proper fixation. Then, the diagnosis of SFT was suggested by immunohistochemistry performed on the spinal mass. The immunohistochemical study demonstrated CD34(+) and STAT6(+) (Figures 3A–C). The patient had an excellent post-operative recovery. After 3 months, a second abdominal MRI showed that the mass in the right lobe of the liver grew larger, and the size was ~3 × 3.5 × 3.5 cm (Figures 1C,D). A right hemi-hepatectomy was performed to remove the liver lesion by gross total resection. The diagnosis of SFT was confirmed with the expression of CD34 and nuclear expression of STAT6 by immunohistochemistry performed on the liver mass (Figures 3D–F). As the prognosis of malignant and metastatic SFTs was poor, we suggested the patient underwent the adjuvant radiotherapy after complete resection of thoracic and liver metastasis SFT. But the patient refused adjuvant radiotherapy and carried out post-operative follow-up on time. Two-year follow-up thoracic MRI and abdominal CT revealed no disease recurrence at the T3 (Figures 4B,C) and the liver (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Non-enhanced abdominal MRI showed that there was an occupying mass in the right lobe of liver, the boundary of tumor was unclear; (B) enhanced abdominal MRI indicated mild heterogeneous enhancement of solid components around the tumor and the size of the tumor was ~2.7 × 2.8 × 3 cm; (C) a second non-enhanced abdominal MRI showed that the mass in the right lobe of liver grew larger, and the size was ~3 × 3.5 × 3.5 cm; (D) a second enhanced abdominal MRI showed the low density of the cyst was seen in the tumor, which was considered to be accompanied by hemorrhage.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Thoracic MRI and CT scan showed the size of the lesion to the left of the T3 (A–F) vertebral body was ~3.7 × 5.3 cm. Arrow indicates the location of tumor.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain of thoracic mass showed compact cells with some prominent dilated vessels; (B) immunohistochemical study demonstrated the expression of CD34; (C) the immunohistochemical study showing positive nuclear reactivity of STAT6; (D) HE stains of the liver mass showed compact tumor cells with some prominent dilated vessels; (E) immunohistochemical study demonstrated the expression of CD34; (F) immunohistochemical study showed positive nuclear reactivity of STAT6.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. (A) Post-operative radiograph showed fixation of the thoracic spine from T2 to T4; (B) T2-weighted sagittal MRI showed no disease recurrence at T3; (C) axial MRI showed no disease recurrence at T3; (D) abdominal MRI showed no disease recurrence at the liver.

Discussion

SFTs are rare neoplasms that originate from the pleura. However, SFTs have been found to occur in any site, including the spine. Spinal SFTs are always classified as intramedullary (58%), intradural extramedullary (24%), or extradural (18%) (9, 10). More importantly, as far as we know, no previous reports have described a malignant and metastatic SFT occurred in the thoracic vertebrae. SFTs may occur in individuals of all ages, ranging from 10 to 85 years. Although most of SFTs have benign features, 10–20% of SFTs are malignant and prone to metastasis. Many SFT patients probably need to undergo repeated surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy because of high recurrence rate and the risk of distant metastasis.

Histopathologically, typical benign SFTs contain clear tumor cell boundaries and dilated branched blood vessels. Moreover, typical benign SFTs are always present with a fusiform pattern, scattered among the collagen fiber bundles in different forms. In addition, 80% of extra thoracic SFTs always present with atypical histological features, including increased cellularity, a large number of nuclear pleomorphisms, focal necrosis, and four or more mitoses per ten high-power fields (HPFs). Most SFTs usually exhibit positive staining for mesenchymal and vascular endothelium-related antigens, such as CD34, CD99, Bcl-2, and vimentin, whereas these tumors exhibit negative staining for SMA, EMA, and GFAP. Because these biomarkers are non-specific for the diagnosis of SFTs, STAT6 was recently found to be a typical tumor marker for the diagnosis of SFTs (11, 12). Therefore, the combination of STAT6 with CD34 plays a crucial role in diagnosing SFTs. More importantly, the presence of malignant cellular features in SFTs significantly increases the possibility of local recurrences or distant metastases.

Furthermore, as reported by Melone et al., high-grade SFTs recur 90% of patients, whereas the rate of recurrence for low-grade SFTs was merely 27% (13). Statistically, the mean time of distant metastasis is ~7.5 years, which indicates that long-term follow-up is required for the treatment of SFTs. Moreover, once distant metastasis occurs, the prognosis of SFTs worsens. In our case, although the primary meningeal SFT was completely resected and did not recur based on post-operative brain CT, the patient experienced distant metastasis after 10 years, including to T3 and the liver. To the best of our knowledge, previous reports of SFT metastasis to both of the spine and liver are relatively rare, with equal distribution among the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal regions. Additionally, the vertebral body is the most likely metastasis site because of its abundant vascularization and bone marrow.

In terms of the management of metastatic SFTs, there is still no consensus because of the lack of sufficient research with long-term follow-up in the literatures. The management of metastatic SFTs typically consists surgery with or without radiotherapy. However, surgical excision still remains the first choice of treatment. Son et al. reported a case of malignant SFT which was resected but a local recurrence developed rapidly (14). Meanwhile, as reported by van Houdt et al., the factor most significantly correlated with local recurrence is the positive resection margin (15). Therefore, patients with a positive excision margin have a statistically significant higher risk of local recurrence. Some authors claim that maximal safe surgical excision remains the optimal treatment for SFTs. As reported, gross total resection is better than subtotal resection and leads to a longer disease-free survival (16).while some authors claim that en-bloc resection is the best treatment for SFTs (17, 18). In our case, the presented patient underwent gross total resection at the T3 vertebrate and liver sites. Post-operative radiotherapy has been shown to prolong the median progression-free survival from 44 to 58 months and overall survival from 80 to 93 months. Although the role of post-operative radiotherapy is not well-established, it can be used in patients with residual disease, high-grade tumors, and metastatic disease. Nonetheless, post-operative radiotherapy currently remains an adjuvant method rather than a substitute for gross total resection because gross total resection alone has a superior median overall survival compared to subtotal resection. As the prognosis of malignant and metastatic SFTs is poor, post-operative follow-up is highly recommended. More importantly, long-term clinical or radiographic follow-up remains mandatory to monitor a late recurrence or metastasis which can occur after more than 10 years (19, 20).

Conclusion

The literature lacks randomized controlled trials and large studies that define the natural history of malignant SFTs and recommendations of a precise management plan for the disease. Further studies are needed to understand the long-term outcome and clinical features for the diagnosis of the rare clinical situation. However, the best choice for treatment is gross total resection, which seems to provide the optimal treatment to achieve long-term disease-free survival.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

MM and LZ contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript and designed the figures. CH and XY collected clinical data and followed the patient during the clinical course. SH revised the article. HY and QZ interpreted the radiological images. DS reviewed and approved the final version of this article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Klemperer P, Coleman BR. Primary neoplasms of the pleura. A report of five cases. Am J Ind Med. (1992) 22:1–31. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700220103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Schoffski P, Timmermans I, Hompes D, Stas M, Sinnaeve F, De Leyn P, et al. Clinical presentation, natural history, and therapeutic approach in patients with solitary fibrous tumor: a retrospective analysis. Sarcoma. (2020) 2020:1385978. doi: 10.1155/2020/1385978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kim BJ, Yoo E, Choi J, Kim S. Intradural-extramedullary solitary fibrous tumor of the thoracic spine: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. (2020) 15:709–11. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.02.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Montano N, Rigante L, Papacci F, Novello M, Lauriola L, Meglio M. Intradural extramedullary lesion of the conus medullaris. Solitary fibrous tumor. J Clin Neurosci. (2013) 20:715–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.11.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hoshide R, Jandial R. World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors: an era of molecular biology. World Neurosurg. (2016) 94:561–2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Carneiro SS, Scheithauer BW, Nascimento AG, Hirose T, Davis DH. Solitary fibrous tumor of the meninges: a lesion distinct from fibrous meningioma. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol. (1996) 106:217–24. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/106.2.217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yagyu H, Hara Y, Murohashi K, Ishikawa Y, Isaka T, Woo T, et al. Giant solitary fibrous tumor of pleura presenting both benign and malignant features. Am J Case Rep. (2019) 20:1755–9. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.919639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Demicco EG, Wagner MJ, Maki RG, Gupta V, Iofin I, Lazar AJ, et al. Risk assessment in solitary fibrous tumors: validation and refinement of a risk stratification model. Mod Pathol. (2017) 30:1433–42. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.54

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kulkarni RS, Parikh SK, Anand AS, Panchal HP, Patel AA, Trivedi P, et al. Solitary plasmacytoma of bone involving spine in a 12-year-old boy: report of a rare case and review of literature. J Pediatr Neurosci. (2017) 12:67–71. doi: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_153_16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhang YW, Xiao Q, Zeng JH, Deng L. Solitary fibrous tumor of the lumbar spine resembling schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.004. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Schweizer L, Koelsche C, Sahm F, Piro RM, Capper D, Reuss DE, et al. Meningeal hemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumors carry the NAB2-STAT6 fusion and can be diagnosed by nuclear expression of STAT6 protein. Acta Neuropathol. (2013) 125:651–8. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1117-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Robinson DR, Wu YM, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Cao X, Lonigro RJ, Sung YS, et al. Identification of recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in solitary fibrous tumor by integrative sequencing. Nat Genet. (2013) 45:180–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Melone AG, D'Elia A, Santoro F, Salvati M, Delfini R, Cantore G, et al. Intracranial hemangiopericytoma–our experience in 30 years: a series of 43 cases and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. (2014) 81:556–62. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Son S, Lee SG, Jeong DH, Yoo CJ. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of tandem lesions in the skull and spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. (2013) 54:246–9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.3.246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van Houdt WJ, Westerveld CM, Vrijenhoek JE, van Gorp J, van Coevorden F, Verhoef C, et al. Prognosis of solitary fibrous tumors: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. (2013) 20:4090–5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3242-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pasquali S, Gronchi A, Strauss D, Bonvalot S, Jeys L, Stacchiotti S, et al. Resectable extra-pleural and extra-meningeal solitary fibrous tumours: a multi-centre prognostic study. Eur J Surg Oncol. (2016) 42:1064–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huang W, Wei H, Cai W, Xu W, Yang X, Liu T, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary metastatic tumors of the fourth lumbar spine in a posterior-only approach. World Neurosurg. (2018) 120:e8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chen L, Sang Y, Zhang Z, Yang W, Chen Y. Strategy for initial en bloc resection of a giant mediastinal solitary fibrous tumor: judicious usage of cardiopulmonary bypass. Thorac Cancer. (2020) 11:2048–50. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vallat-Decouvelaere AV, Dry SM, Fletcher CD. Atypical and malignant solitary fibrous tumors in extrathoracic locations: evidence of their comparability to intra-thoracic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. (1998) 22:1501–11. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Barthelmess S, Geddert H, Boltze C, Moskalev EA, Bieg M, Sirbu H, et al. Solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas with different variants of the NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion are characterized by specific histomorphology and distinct clinicopathological features. Am J Pathol. (2014) 184:1209–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: solitary fibrous tumor, liver, spine, metastasis, malignant tumor

Citation: Mao M, Zhou L, Huang C, Yan X, Hu S, Yin H, Zhao Q and Song D (2020) Case Report: A Malignant Liver and Thoracic Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A 10-Year Journey From the Brain to the Liver and the Spine. Front. Surg. 7:570582. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.570582

Received: 05 August 2020; Accepted: 09 November 2020;
Published: 03 December 2020.

Edited by:

Christopher William Seder, Rush University Medical Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Giovanni Grignani, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), Italy
Fabrizio Minervini, University of Lucerne, Switzerland

Copyright © 2020 Mao, Zhou, Huang, Yan, Hu, Yin, Zhao and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dianwen Song, ZGlhbndlbi5zb25nJiN4MDAwNDA7c2hnaC5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.