Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Sports Act. Living, 17 July 2024
Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement
This article is part of the Research Topic Muscle and Tendon Injuries in Sporting and Tactical Populations: Mechanisms, Prevention and Rehabilitation View all 5 articles

Recovery from sport-induced muscle damage in relation to match-intervals in major events

  • 1School of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
  • 2Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

Muscle damage could affect the next match performance in sports when the time to recover from a previous match is shorter. We examined the interval between matches in nine team sports (e.g., soccer, rugby, field hockey, basketball, volleyball, baseball) and two racket sports (badminton, tennis) in World Cups held in 2022-2023, 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games and Gland Slam in 2023. We then performed narrative review using three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) to get information about muscle damage and recovery in the 11 sports, and discussed whether the intervals in the events would be enough for athletes. We found that the match intervals varied among sports and events ranging from 0 to 17 days. The interval was the shortest for softball (0–2 days) and the longest (5–17 days) for rugby. Regarding muscle damage, changes in muscle function and/or performance measures after a match were not reported for cricket, volleyball and softball, but some information was available for other sports, although the studies did not necessarily use athletes who participated in the major events. It was found that recovery was longer for soccer and rugby than other sports. Importantly, the match-intervals in the events did not appear to accommodate the recovery time required from the previous match in many sports. This could increase a risk of injury and affect players’ conditions and health. Changing the match-intervals may be difficult, since it affects the budget of sporting events, but an adequate interval between matches should be considered for each sport from the player’s and coach's point of view.

1 Introduction

Major sporting events such as World Cups, Olympic Games, and Gland Slam in tennis attract millions of people worldwide (1). In these events, athletes perform multiple matches in a certain time period, especially when they progress to quarterfinal, semifinal and final matches. However, it is not necessarily clear how matches are scheduled in the sporting events. Limited information is available for the recovery time in relation to the match schedule.

Movements consisting of eccentric (lengthening) contractions (i.e., eccentric-biased movements) of leg and other muscles are performed in sports, which could induce muscle damage representing by delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and prolonged decreases in muscle functions, even for well-trained athletes (24). Muscle damage impairs performance for several days, affecting subsequent training sessions and next matches (59). For example, Chou et al. (3) reported that it took 4–5 days for maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) strength of the knee extensors and flexors and performance measures such as Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level one to return to baseline following a simulated soccer (football) match using a 90 min Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST) performed by elite female soccer players. Since it is likely that official soccer matches are more demanding than the LIST, it is assumed that soccer players require at least 4 days between matches to be ready for the next match (8). However, the interval between soccer matches does not necessarily appear to be longer than 4 days in major events such as World Cups and Olympic Games.

The time taken for recovery from a match varies among sports (3, 5, 1026). For example, Souglis et al. (5) compared soccer, basketball, volleyball and handball at an elite competitive level for muscle damage and inflammatory indices. They showed that soccer produced the greatest increases in inflammatory markers, creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities in the blood, and these were smallest after volleyball. Abián et al. (20) reported no significant changes in MVIC strength of the knee extensors and badminton-specific running and movement velocity after a 45 min simulated badminton match, although some increases in plasma CK activity and myoglobin concentration were observed. A simulated single badminton match played by state-level male players decreased muscle strength, voluntary activation, and muscle soreness of the knee extensors and flexors at immediately after and 1 h after the match, but they returned to the baseline by 1 day after the match (26). A simulated 3 h tennis match played on a hard court induced small increases in muscle soreness at 1–2 days post-match, and decreased muscle function assessed by one repetition maximum (1-RM) squat strength (35%), squat jump (7%), and counter movement jump (10%) at immediately post-match, and at 1 day post-match to a smaller extent (17). However, it is not known the level of muscle damage experienced by elite players who played longer singles matches in the grand slam tennis events in which some matches exceed 3 h.

It is likely that muscle damage carries over in the next match when a time to recover from a previous match was not long enough for some team sports such as soccer and rugby, and racket sports such as tennis. However, it is not known how these are considered for match intervals during official tournaments such as World Cups and Olympic Games. It is important to clarify the recovery time after a match, and examine a match interval in sports, starting from some major events. Therefore, we analyzed the interval between matches of men and women in team sports and racket sports (singles) in major sporting events held in 2021–2023, and reviewed literatures to find information about muscle damage and recovery in these sports to examine whether a recovery time required from a previous match are considered in a match schedule.

2 Methods

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan Normal University (Approval #: 202311HS022). The procedures used in the study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.1 Interval between matches

We included soccer, rugby, field hockey, basketball, handball, volleyball, baseball, cricket, softball, badminton and tennis in this study. We focused on top-level competitions of these sports and examined the events held in 2022 and 2023 for the World Cups, 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games held in 2021, and singles in four major tournaments in tennis (Australia Open, French Open, Wimbledon and US Open) held in 2023. The 2023 World Baseball Classic was used for baseball, and the 2023 World Cup for cricket. The sporting events included in the present study are shown in Table 1. We obtained the information about intervals between matches from the websites of the above events held in 2022 and 2023 (e.g., 2023 FIFA women world cup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_FIFA_Women%27s_World_Cup), and 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games (e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics). We analyzed the intervals (days) between matches of men and women in these sporting events, identified the ranges, and calculated mean ± SD interval for each sport event.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 The sporting events analyzed for intervals between matches in the present study.

2.2 Literature review

We conducted a narrative literature review to obtain information about muscle damage and recovery relating to soccer/football, rugby, field hockey, basketball, handball, volleyball, badminton, tennis, baseball, cricket, and softball. The literature search focused on peer-reviewed journal articles published up until June 2024 using three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar). Search keywords included: “soccer/football,” “rugby,” “field hockey,” “basketball,” “handball,” “volleyball,” “badminton,” “tennis,” “baseball,” “cricket,” “softball,” “match,” “game,” AND “muscle function,” “muscle dysfunction,” “muscle damage,” “muscle injury,” “MVIC strength,” “muscle strength,” “strength,” “isometric strength,” “delayed onset muscle soreness,” “muscle soreness,” “muscle pain,” “range of motion,” “countermovement jump,” “vertical jump,” AND “recovery”. We searched articles written in English related to ‘muscle damage’ and/or ‘recovery’ for the sports included in the analyses of match-intervals (i.e., soccer/football, rugby, field hockey, basketball, handball, volleyball, badminton, tennis, baseball, cricket, softball). We focused on changes in muscle functions [e.g., MVIC strength, range of motion, countermovement jump (CMJ)], delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS)/muscle soreness] and their time course of recovery following a single match due to these variables are the main indirect markers of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage used in previous studies (2, 6, 7). If studies only measured dependent variables (i.e., muscle function, performance) at one time-point post-match, they were excluded since no information of recovery from a match could be obtained.

2.3 Statistical analyses

The descriptive data are presented as ranges and their mean ± SD for each sport event. All statistical analyses were performed using the Microsoft Excel Version 2023.

3 Results

3.1 Match interval

Table 2 shows the intervals (days) between matches (range, mean ± SD) in the sporting events for each sport. The match-intervals differ largely among sports ranging from 0 day to 17 days. The longest match-interval was found for rugby (5–17 days), and the shortest interval was seen for softball (0–2 days).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 The rest interval (days) between matches (range, mean ± SD) in sports included in the world cups (2022–2023) and Tokyo Olympic games (2021), and the four grand slam events in tennis (Australia open, French open, wimbledon and US open).

3.2 Muscle damage and recovery

Table 3 shows changes in muscle functions and/or performance measures after a match or a simulated match of each sport. In many of the studies, a full time-course of the recovery was not investigated (e.g., 1014, 16, 17, 19, 2123, 25, 26), thus the time for the measures to return to the baseline was not clear for many sports. No previous study has investigated changes in muscle function and/or performance measures after a match of volleyball, softball and cricket (Table 3). Based on the available information, the recovery is shorter for badminton, when compared with soccer and rugby, and the longest recovery time was found for rugby (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 The information of gender, age, performance level, duration of a match, and muscle function and/or performance variables, and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) after a match of each sport in the studies. The last time taken the measurements (time of the last measure) and when the measurements were returned to the baseline (time of recovery) are shown.

4 Discussion

The match intervals varied among sports and events such that the intervals in World Cups and Olympic Games were the shortest for softball (0–2 days) and the longest (5–17 days) for rugby (Table 2). Soccer matches were generally scheduled with 2–7 days of rest between matches in the World Cups, but 3–4 days during the Olympic Games, and rugby had a longer interval for men (5–15 days) than women (6–8 days) in the World Cups (Table 2). It appears that the recovery time is somewhat considered in scheduling matches in the events, since the recovery takes longer after rugby or soccer matches than softball matches (Table 3). However, considering the wide range of intervals between matches, and possible large intra- and inter-individual variability in external and internal load in a competition, some athletes are unlikely to recover from a previous match, but still play a following match (e.g., 31).

As shown in Table 3, muscle function and/or performance parameters were impaired following a match for all sports, but the time for them to return to the baseline differed largely among sports. No information about changes in muscle function and/or performance after a match was found in published papers for volleyball, softball and cricket. The extent of decrement in muscle function that elite athletes experience after an official match is not necessarily clear, since many of the studies did not use them as participants (3, 1012, 1519, 2127, 29, 30). Thus, in order to obtain the whole pictures of recovery after matches for elite athletes, more studies are required.

It is well-documented that muscle damage represented by DOMS and prolonged decreases in muscle function is induced by unaccustomed exercises consisting of large volume and/or high-intensity eccentric contractions, and the magnitude of muscle damage is reduced when the same exercises are repeated, known as the repeated bout effect (2, 3234). In spite of the repeated bout effect, some muscle damage is still induced in well-trained athletes (3, 5, 8, 10, 13, 18, 27, 29, 30). The muscle damage impairs performance, which could last for several days (68, 35). It is important to note that muscle damage is induced to some extent even for well-trained athletes who are accustomed to most of the eccentric-biased movements performed in sports (5, 8, 10, 13, 18). It is likely that eccentric-biased movements performed in sports such as rapid deceleration, sudden stop, fast change of direction, landing, jumping, hopping, cutting, body collision/contact and preventing falls are the main causes of the decreases in muscle function and performance parameters (7, 36). It is likely that more strenuous eccentric-biased movements are required in a competitive match than in training and practice sessions, which could exceed the level of the repeated bout effect.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) sets each team must have at least 48 h of rest before the next match played in its official tournaments (https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/2744a0a5e3ded185/original/FIFA-World-Cup-Qatar-2022-Regulations_EN.pdf). However, it seems possible that players required more than 48 h to recover from soccer matches even for well-trained players. Koyama et al. (37) showed that the relative external load of players increased when the competitive level of the opponents increased, suggesting that internal and external loads varied depending on contextual factors. It has been reported that external load and internal load differ between World Cup matches and friendly matches (38). Silva et al. (31) compared the impact of simulation matches and real matches in their systematic review article, and stated that the real matches (11 vs. 11 format) induced greater magnitude of DOMS and increased CK activity in the blood, although neuromuscular alterations were similar. Chou et al. (3) and Tseng et al. (9) reported that it took 4–5 days for elite female soccer players to restore MVIC strength of the knee extensors and flexors and performance measures such as Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 to the baseline levels following a 90 min LIST (3, 9). Thus, it seems likely that actual soccer matches could induce greater muscle damage than the LIST, because of other activities with a ball, and competitive nature of matches including contacts and impacts with opponents, thus the recovery takes longer. However, some studies reported that muscle soreness and some performance measures (sprint, vertical jump) fully returned to baseline at 24–48 h following a 90 min soccer match (27, 28, 30). It appears that many factors such as physical and mental demands in matches, environment and condition (e.g., temperature, humidity, ground condition) and the level of players affect the magnitude of muscle damage.

Based on the data from the female soccer players in the study by Chou et al. (3), and possible greater physical and physiological demands in competitive matches in major events such as World Cup, it is assumed that players need to have more than 4 days between matches. However, the interval between matches was 3–7 days for the group rounds, and that for the quarter finals, semifinals, third place and final was 3–6 days in the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup. It is possible that a team that had a shorter interval between matches has disadvantage against a team that has a longer interval between matches. It is interesting to note that the interval between matches was not the same in 6 out of 8 matches in the quarter-final, semi-final, final and the third-place matches between teams, and 5 out of 6 matches (83%) were won by the teams who had a longer interval from the previous match in the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup (8).

Although it is ideal to have the same match interval for the teams competing each other from the point of fairness, this would be almost impossible from the organizational perspective. Thus, it is important to find strategies to facilitate recovery after a match to prepare players for subsequent competition during sport events. One of the strategies is to use therapeutic modalities such as far-infrared ray (FIR) lamp therapy that has been shown to enhance recovery from muscle damage and performance parameters following a single bout (9) or multiple bouts of LIST (39).

It has been reported that basketball players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) teams scored more with a 2-day rest interval between matches when compared to consecutive matches (40), and had less successful three-point shots per 100 possessions and 20% less dunks during the fourth quarter compared to the first quarter when matches were played on consecutive days (41). The interval between matches in rugby (7–9 days) is longer than that in soccer (2–7 days) as shown in Table 2. The full recovery of muscle function and performance from a soccer (3–5 days) and rugby (2–6 days) match seems similar (Table 3). The playing time is shorter for rugby (80 min) than soccer (90–120 min); however, the total numbers of contact conditions and the extent of the contact impacts are likely to be greater for a rugby match (e.g., tackling: 156 times/match, scrums: 22 times/match, rucks: 16 times/match; total: 294 times/match) (42) than soccer (no tackling is allowed; ∼147 times body collision/match) (43). This may be a reason for a longer interval between matches in rugby than soccer. The full recovery of muscle function and performance after a field hockey match took about 1–48 h, while that following badminton and tennis singles matches took less than 2 days (Table 3). It is likely that the magnitude and volume of eccentric-biased movements are less for badminton and tennis than those in soccer and rugby. However, when a match duration is long such as more than 3 h in tennis for example, it is likely that a large amount of eccentric-biased movements contractions of lower limb muscles are performed, resulting in muscle damage and impaired performance. It is interesting to investigate how tennis players recover from a previous long match and are ready for the next match within 2 days. It is also possible that the interindividual responses differ in different conditions due to external-internal load influenced by match duration and contextual factors such as opponents’ level and fixture congestion (44).

When players perform matches without full recovery from previous matches, it may result in accumulative physical and mental fatigue, compromise performance and increase injury risks of players (40, 45, 46). In fact, previous studies reported that a match congestion increased non-contact injuries in professional soccer players (45, 4750), field hockey players (51) and basketball players (52). For example, Dupont et al. (45) reported that professional male soccer players played two matches per week without affecting the distance covered and the numbers of sprint during matches, but it increased the injury rate 6 folds when compared with a match per week. Mason et al. (51) showed that field hockey matches with 24 h interval had 3.8–6.8 times higher injury risks than matches with 3–7 days interval. Additionally, athletes have more risks of illness in congested match conditions (5356). For example, Schwellnus et al. (55) stated that a congested match schedule increased risk of both subclinical immunological changes that could increase the risk of illness, and actual symptoms of illness or diagnosed illness. In the study of English Premier League, Morgans et al. (53) showed that playing 5 matches in 15 days led to large decreases in salivary immunoglobulin-A (SIgA) concentration (e.g., 2-day post-match 3: −68%, 2-day post-match 5: −71%). Therefore, it is important to examine adequate intervals between matches to minimize injury risks and illness of the players. Sport organizations and/or sports event organizers should consider the time taken for players to recover from a previous match.

It is also interesting to examine if a shorter interval between matches lowers the match quality, and higher quality matches can be seen when athletes are competing with enough recovery from previous matches. In fact, Folgado et al. (57) examined the physical and tactical performances of an English professional football team under congested (played one match every 3 days interval for 3 matches) and non-congested (played one match at least 6 days rest for 3 matches) fixture periods. They reported that no differences in the physical performances such as the total distance covered between congested and non-congested matches, but players spent more time for movement synchronized during the non-congested fixtures (lateral displacements: 41.3%, longitudinal displacements: 77.2%) when compared with congested fixtures (38.5%, 74.5%). The authors stated that the reduction of synchronization could be associated with an increased perception of fatigue (57).

It may be difficult to change match-intervals in sporting events, since it affects the budget and schedule of players in a season for other events. Pillay et al. (58) conducted a survey study of 1,055 professional male soccer players around the world, and found that 76% of them thought that there should be regulations in place to protect them from insufficient breaks (i.e., not enough rest in both off-season and in-season). Coaches and medical practitioners need to have strategies to reduce fatigue and muscle damage in matches, as well as facilitate the recovery of athletes after matches. It is necessary to have a simple measure to assess status of athletes including their readiness for the next match. In soccer, we reported that counter movement jump height could indicate recovery from a previous match well (3). Sporting organizations should communicate with coaches and athletes to set a schedule of events, and they should also seek medical and scientific guidance before making a match calendar (53). An adequate interval between matches should be discussed more openly for each sport. To minimize injuries and accumulative fatigue as well as prevent illness in sporting events, effective recovery strategies are important to be developed and established, warranting more studies. It is also important to monitor match intervals in upcoming major sporting events in 2024 such as the Olympic Games Paris and beyond.

There are several limitations in the present study. First, the present study included only 11 sports (soccer, rugby, field hockey, basketball, volleyball, baseball, cricket, handball, softball, badminton, tennis) among many, and focused on World Cups held in 2023, Olympic Games in 2021, and tennis gland slams in 2023. It is interesting to extend the analyses to previous events held before the ones included in the present study. Second, we searched articles relating to the 11 sports in which muscle damage and recovery were investigated using the literature review, but it was not based on a systematic review protocol. Thirdly, the present study included studies with participants who were not necessarily elite athletes. Since limited studies used elite athletes, and it is possible that they could recover from a match in a shorter time, actual recovery profiles of elite athletes who represent countries in the major sporting events are largely unknown. In order to better understand muscle damage and recovery in sporting events, more studies are required using top levels athletes, and barriers to conduct such studies requires good collaboration with teams, athletes and sporting organizations. Fourthly, LIST may not represent contemporary soccer matches and may demands of a female match-play. Magalhes et al. (12) reported that changes in muscle damage and performance parameters following a 90 min LIST played by male players of the second and third Portuguese divisions were similar to those after a 90 min soccer match. However, the LIST does not include soccer specific skills such as passing, kicking and heading a ball. Future studies are warranted to examine the effects of congested matches on muscle damage, fatigue, performance and health.

In conclusion, the present study showed that the interval between matches varied among sports and events, and the match intervals in the major sporting events were not necessarily long enough for the players to fully recover from the previous match in many cases. It may not be that sport organizations and event organizers can arrange the rest interval based on the full recovery time. More studies are warranted to investigate what the best rest interval is to be set between matches for each sport event such as World Cup and Olympic Games. Since the recovery time is crucial, it is necessary to for an event organiser to schedule matches to give the same match interval to the teams competing against at least.

Data availability statement

The datasets are presented in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

KN: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. TC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 111-2410-H-003-147-MY3, 113-2425-H-008-001) and the National Taiwan Normal University within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan. However, the funding bodies played no roles in the study design, data search/collection and analyses, interpretation of the data and writing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Wen-Chin Tseng, Miss Cecilla Lee, Miss Hsing-Yu Kang and Mr Chuan-Wei Chan for their assistance in collecting information and analyses.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Gammon S. Sports events: typologies, people and place. In: Page SJ, Connell J, editors. The Routledge Handbook of Events. London: Routledge (2011). p. 104–18.

Google Scholar

2. Chen TC, Nosaka K, Sacco P. Intensity of eccentric exercise, shift of optimum angle, and the magnitude of repeated-bout effect. J Appl Physiol. (2007) 102(3):992–9.doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00425.2006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Chou TY, Nosaka K, Chen TC. Muscle damage and performance after single and multiple simulated matches in university elite female soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:4134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chou TY, Hsieh CC, Hsu ST, Yu WC, Huang YC. Effects of far-infrared radiation on the recovery of maximal eccentric exercise-impaired proprioception markers in the hamstrings. Phys Educ J. (2022) 55(1):53–64. doi: 10.6222/pej.202203_55(1).0004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Souglis A, Bogdanis GC, Giannopoulou I, Papadopoulos C, Apostolidis N. Comparison of inflammatory responses and muscle damage indices following a soccer, basketball, volleyball and handball game at an elite competitive level. Res Sports Med. (2015) 23(1):59–72. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2014.975814

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M. Eccentric exercise: physiological characteristics and acute responses. Sports Med. (2017) 47(4):663–75. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0624-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hody S, Croisier JL, Bury T, Rogister B, Leprince P. Eccentric muscle contractions: risks and benefits. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:536. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00536

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chen TC, Chou TY, Nosaka K. Adequate interval between matches in elite female soccer players. J Sports Sci Med. (2023) 22(4):614–25. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tseng WC, Nosaka K, Chou TY, Howatson G, Chen TC. Effects of far-infrared radiation lamp therapy on recovery from a simulated soccer-match in elite female soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2024) 34(4):e14615. doi: 10.1111/sms.14615

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ispirlidis I, Fatouros IG, Jamurtas AZ, Nikolaidis MG, Michailidis I, Douroudos I, et al. Time-course of changes in inflammatory and performance responses following a soccer game. Clin J Sport Med. (2008) 18:423–31. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181818e0b

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Reinold MM, Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Sheheane C, Dun S, Fleisig GS, et al. Changes in shoulder and elbow passive range of motion after pitching in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med. (2008) 36(3):523–7. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308935

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Magalhes J, Rebelo A, Oliveira E, Silva JR, Marques F, Ascensão A. Impact of Loughborough intermittent shuttle test versus soccer match on physiological, biochemical and neuromuscular parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2010) 108(1):39–48. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1161-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. McLean BD, Coutts AJ, Kelly V, McGuigan MR, Cormack SJ. Neuromuscular, endocrine, and perceptual fatigue responses during different length between-match microcycles in professional rugby league players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. (2010) 5(3):367–83. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.3.367

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Markers of post-match fatigue in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. (2011) 25(4):1030–9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc22cc

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Twist C, Sykes D. Evidence of exercise-induced muscle damage following a simulated rugby league match. Eur J Sport Sci. (2011) 11(6):401–9. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2010.536575

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chatzinikolaou A, Draganidis D, Avloniti A, Karipidis A, Jamurtas AZ, Skevaki CL, et al. The microcycle of inflammation and performance changes after a basketball match. J Sports Sci. (2014) 32(9):870–82. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.865251

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gomes RV, Santos RCO, Nosaka K, Moreira A, Miyabara EH, Aoki MS. Muscle damage after a tennis match in young players. Biol Sport. (2014) 31(1):27–32. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1083276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Moreira A, Nosaka K, Nunes JA, Viveiros L, Jamurtas AZ, Aoki MS. Changes in muscle damage markers in female basketball players. Biol Sport. (2014) 31(1):3–7. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1083272

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pliauga V, Kamandulis S, Dargevičiūtė G, Jaszczanin J, Klizienė I, Stanislovaitienė J, et al. The effect of a simulated basketball game on players’ sprint and jump performance, temperature and muscle damage. J Hum Kinet. (2015) 46:167–75. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Abián P, Coso JD, Salinero JJ, Gallo-Salazar C, Areces F, Ruiz-Vicente D, et al. Muscle damage produced during a simulated badminton match in competitive male players. Res Sports Med. (2016) 24(1):104–17. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2015.1076416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Roe G, Till K, Darrall-Jones J, Phibbs P, Weakley J, Read D, et al. Changes in markers of fatigue following a competitive match in elite academy rugby union players. S Afr J Sports Med. (2016) 28:2–5. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2016/v28i1a418

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Brownstein CG, Dent JP, Parker P, Hicks KM, Howatson G, Goodall S, et al. Etiology and recovery of neuromuscular fatigue following competitive soccer match-play. Front Physiol. (2017) 8:831. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00831

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Thomas K, Dent J, Howatson G, Goodall S. Etiology and recovery of neuromuscular fatigue after simulated soccer match play. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2017) 49(5):955–64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001196

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Burt D, Hayman O, Forsyth J, Doma K, Twist C. Monitoring indices of exercise-induced muscle damage and recovery in male field hockey: is it time to retire creatine kinase? Sci Sports. (2020) 35(6):402–4. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2020.02.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. da Silva BVC, Simim MADM, da Silva RB, Mendes EL, Ide BN, Marocolo M, et al. Time course of recovery for performance attributes and circulating markers of muscle damage following a rugby union match in amateur athletes. Sports (Basel). (2020) 8:64. doi: 10.3390/sports8050064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lin Z, Blazevich AJ, Abbiss CR, Wilkie JC, Nosaka K. Neuromuscular fatigue and muscle damage following a simulated singles badminton match. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2023) 123(6):1229–40. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05148-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Sagayama H, Shimizu K, Yasumatsu M, Nakamura D, et al. Impact of curcumin supplementation on exercise performance and muscle damage after a soccer match: a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2024) 124(7):2161–70. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05429-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Junior GOC, Goulart KNDO, Pimenta EM, Fortes SLA, Gomes KB, Couto BP. Comparison of the effect of passive recovery and self-myofascial release in post-match recovery in female soccer players. J Hum Sport Exerc. (2024) 19(2):510–21. doi: 10.55860/j6dyvg90

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dewangga MW, Wijianto AW, Faozi E, Cahyadi MM, Saputra H, Furqony IY, et al. Biomarkers of muscle damage and physical performance after soccer matches for women’s soccer teams. Sports Sci Health. (2024) 14(V):5–14. doi: 10.7251/SSH24V005D

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Marqués-Jiménez D, Calleja-González J, Arratibel-Imaz I, Jones MT, Terrados N. Effect of acute and residual match-induced fatigue on repeated sprint ability in soccer players. Sci Sports. (2024) 39(1):96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2023.01.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Silva JR, Rumpf MC, Hertzog M, Castagna C, Farooq A, Girard O, et al. Acute and residual soccer match-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. (2018) 48(3):539–83. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0798-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. McHugh PM. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect: the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2003) 13(2):88–97. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.02477.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hyldahl RD, Chen TC, Nosaka K. Mechanisms and mediators of the skeletal muscle repeated bout effect. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2017) 45(1):24–33. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000095

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Morin T, Souron R, Boulaouche I, Jubeau M, Nordez A, Lacourpaille L. Mild to moderate damage in knee extensor muscles accumulates after two bouts of maximal eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2023) 123(12):2723–32. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05257-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kang HY, Fu SK, Tseng KW, Chen AH, Tseng WC. Effect of arm immobilization on impairment of muscle strength, atrophy and proprioception. Phys Educ J. (2021) 54(3):215–24. doi: 10.6222/pej.202109_54(3).0002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Yu B, Kirkendall DT, Garrett WE Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: anatomy, physiology, and motor control. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. (2002) 10(1):58–68. doi: 10.1177/0363546505284183

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Koyama T, Nishikawa J, Yaguchi K, Irino T, Rikukawa A. A comparison of the physical demands generated by playing different opponents in basketball friendly matches. Biol Sport. (2024) 41(1):253–60. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.129474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Villaseca-Vicuña R, Perez-Contreras J, Zabaloy S, Merino-Muñoz P, Valenzuela L, Burboa J, et al. Comparison of match load and wellness between friendly and world cup matches in elite female soccer players. Appl Sci. (2023) 13:1612. doi: 10.3390/app13031612

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hsieh CC, Nosaka K, Chou TY, Hsu ST, Chen TC. Effects of far-infrared radiation-lamp therapy on recovery from simulated soccer match running activities in elite soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. (2022) 17(9):1432–8. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Yang J, Wu C, Zhou C, Zhang S, Leicht AS, Gomez M-A. Influence of match congestion on performances in the national basketball association. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:630769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630769

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Steenland K, Deddens JA. Effect of travel and rest on performance of professional basketball players. Sleep. (1997) 20(5):366–9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/20.5.366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Paul L, Naughton M, Jones B, Davidow D, Patel A, Lambert M, et al. Quantifying collision frequency and intensity in rugby union and rugby sevens: a systematic review. Sports Med Open. (2022) 8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00398-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Tscholl P, O’Riordan D, Fuller CW, Dvorak J, Junge A. Tackle mechanisms and match characteristics in women’s elite football tournaments. Br J Sports Med. (2007) 41(Suppl 1):i15–9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.036889

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Silva JR. The soccer season: performance variations and evolutionary trends. PeerJ. (2022) 10:e14082. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Dupont G, Nedelec M, McCall A, McCormack D, Berthoin S, Wisløff U. Effect of 2 soccer matches in a week on physical performance and injury rate. Am J Sports Med. (2010) 38(9):1752–8. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361236

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kang HY, Chou TY, Tseng WC, Lima LCR, Chen TC. Analysis of rest intervals between matches at different levels of official soccer tournaments. Phys Educ J. (2024). In press. doi: 10.6222/202408/PP.0009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med. (2011) 45(7):553–8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.060582

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. McCall A, Dupont G, Ekstrand J. Internal workload and non-contact injury: a one-season study of five teams from the UEFA elite club injury study. Br J Sports Med. (2018) 52(23):1517–22. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Howle K, Waterson A, Duffield R. Injury incidence and workloads during congested schedules in football. Int J Sports Med. (2020) 41(2):75–81. doi: 10.1055/a-1028-7600

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Mannino BJ, Yedikian T, Mojica ES, Bi A, Alaia M, Gonzalez-Lomas G. The COVID lockdown and its effects on soft tissue injuries in premier league athletes. Phys Sportsmed. (2023) 51(1):40–4. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1980746

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Mason J, Rahlf AL, Groll A, Wellmann K, Junge A, Zech A. The interval between matches significantly influences injury risk in field hockey. Int J Sports Med. (2022) 43(3):262–8. doi: 10.1055/a-1577-3451

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Esteves PT, Mikolajec K, Schelling X, Sampaio J. Basketball performance is affected by the schedule congestion: NBA back-to-backs under the microscope. Eur J Sport Sci. (2021) 21(1):26–35. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1736179

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Morgans R, Orme P, Anderson L, Drust B, Morton JP. An intensive winter fixture schedule induces a transient fall in salivary IgA in english premier league soccer players. Res Sports Med. (2014) 22(4):346–54. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2014.944641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Moreira A, Bradley P, Carling C, Arruda AFS, Spigolon LMP, Franciscon C, et al. Effect of a congested match schedule on immune-endocrine responses, technical performance and session-RPE in elite youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. (2016) 34(24):2255–61. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1205753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Schwellnus M, Soligard T, Alonso J-M, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, et al. How much is too much? (part 2) international Olympic committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness. Br J Sports Med. (2016) 50(17):1043–52. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Mortatti AL, Oliveira R, Pinto J, Galvão-Coelho NL, Almeida RND, Aoki MS, et al. A congested match schedule alters internal match load and affects salivary immunoglobulin A concentration in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. (2022) 36(6):1655–9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Folgado H, Duarte R, Marques P, Sampaio J. The effects of congested fixtures period on tactical and physical performance in elite football. J Sports Sci. (2015) 33(12):1238–47. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1022576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pillay L, Burgess D, van Rensburg DCJ, Kerkhoffs GM, Gouttebarge V. The congested international match calendar in football: views of 1055 professional male players. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. (2022) 14:200. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00597-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: World Cup, Olympic Games, grand slam, delayed onset muscle soreness, muscle function, performance, injury

Citation: Nosaka K and Chen TC (2024) Recovery from sport-induced muscle damage in relation to match-intervals in major events. Front. Sports Act. Living 6: 1422986. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1422986

Received: 30 April 2024; Accepted: 3 July 2024;
Published: 17 July 2024.

Edited by:

Franck Brocherie, Institut national du sport, de l'expertise et de la performance (INSEP), France

Reviewed by:

Giuseppe Coratella, University of Milan, Italy
Daichi Yamashita, Japan Institute of Sports Sciences (JISS), Japan
Joao Renato Silva, University of Porto, Portugal

© 2024 Nosaka and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Trevor C. Chen, dGNjaGVuQG50bnUuZWR1LnR3

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.