A correction has been applied to this article in:
Corrigendum: Hydrogen atoms near the exobase are cold: independent observations do not support the hot exosphere concept
Dmytro Kotov1*
Oleksandr Bogomaz1,2- 1Institute of Ionosphere, Kharkiv, Ukraine
- 2State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
1 Introduction
Atomic hydrogen (H) near the exobase (above ∼500 km) is the primary source of neutral and charged particles for the two largest systems of near-Earth space–the geocorona and plasmasphere.
The H atoms near the exobase have long been considered to be in thermal equilibrium with the dense ambient atomic oxygen thermosphere. However, in their analysis of the GUVI satellite observations of dayside Lyman-α emission at low solar activity, Qin and Waldrop (2016) concluded that the exobase hydrogen atoms are extremely hot (∼20,000 K), which is more than 20 times hotter than the oxygen thermosphere. This result contradicts the fundamental assumptions of existing geocoronal theories. Qin and Waldrop listed several possible sources of the hot H atoms and postulated that the high temperature is a consequence of incomplete collisional thermalization due to the low thermospheric oxygen density at solar minimum.
Here, we question the Qin and Waldrop conclusions on the basis of comparison with results from numerous different independent observations of temperature and density of atomic hydrogen and of hydrogen ion and electron densities. We show that those observations provide comprehensive evidence in favour of validity of classic cold hydrogen concept.
2 Comparison to observations by independent techniques
Obviously, the most solid evidence pro or contra hot hydrogen concept could be provided by independent measurements of the hydrogen atoms temperature near the exobase. Such observations were conducted for typical mid-latitudes during magnetically quiet periods and medium-to-high solar activity conditions by Mierkiewicz et al. (2012). The authors retrieved the atomic hydrogen temperatures near the exobase from the Balmer-α spectra data within 2 years for all the seasons. Their hydrogen temperature estimates (range from 710 K to 975 K) are two to three times smaller than one of Qin and Waldrop (∼2200 K) and are close to the temperature of the ambient oxygen provided for the same location, dates, and altitudes by the well-tested NRLMSISE-00 model (Picone et al., 2002). This closeness evidences against the existence of a notable amount of much hotter H atoms near the exobase during medium-to-high solar activity conditions with a caveat that Mierkiewicz et al. temperatures were obtained for dawn and dusk while Qin and Waldrop estimates are for near-noon time. It should be noted that no significant change of the H atoms temperature is expected from the noon towards dusk because (1) the ambient oxygen thermosphere changes are small from the noon towards the dusk (the temperature and density decrease by only several tens percent) and (2) lifetime of the exospheric H atoms is ∼ 1 day as estimated by Hodges (1994) for the daytime hydrogen temperatures of the same order of magnitude as the estimates of Qin and Waldrop. These imply that, even if the hypothetical hotter H atoms are originated during the daytime, they do not leave the exosphere through the night and their chance to be cooled is not larger than during the day.
Another sensitive indicator of the correctness or incorrectness of the hot hydrogen concept is the H density at high altitudes in the exosphere. It is seen from Figure 2 b, e of the Qin and Waldrop paper that change of the classic cold hydrogen concept on the hot hydrogen concept increases the H density at an altitude of 20,000 km by a factor of ∼ 5 for medium-to-high solar activity. For such conditions, H density at altitudes of ∼ 20,000 km was retrieved from Lyman-α observations by the Dynamics Explorer 1 satellite (Rairden et al., 1986) and TWINS satellite (Zoennchen et al., 2015) and those estimates are close to ones obtained by Qin and Waldrop using cold hydrogen approach. It should be noted that both the analyses by Rairden et al. and Zoennchen et al. were also conducted assuming the cold hydrogen concept, i.e., the equality of the exobase hydrogen temperature to the temperature of oxygen thermosphere. Since this equality is supported by the above discussed H temperature observations of Mierkiewicz et al., the Dynamics Explorer 1 and TWINS H density estimates provides further support for correctness of the classical cold hydrogen concept.
For the solar minimum, for which Qin and Waldrop retrieved the largest temperatures of the H atom (∼20,000 K), there are no independent observations of the H temperature. Thus, despite extreme sensitivity of the high-altitude exospheric H density to change of cold hydrogen assumption to hot one (see Figure 2 b, e of Qin and Waldrop paper), comparison with other observations employing cold hydrogen approach (Zoennchen et al., 2011; Zoennchen et al., 2013) cannot be useful to refute or support hot hydrogen concept.
Indirect support of validity of the classic cold hydrogen concept for solar minimum comes from numerous comparisons of the observed H+ ion and electron densities in the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere with the results of simulations using physical model of the ionosphere-plasmasphere system (Kotov et al., 2015; Kotov et al., 2016; Kotov et al., 2018; Kotov et al., 2019; Panasenko et al., 2021; Kotov et al., 2023). Those plasma densities are quite sensitive to the H density near the exobase (Kotov et al., 2023) but insensitive to the H temperature because the O++H reaction responsible to the densities is near thermo neutral (Fox and Sung, 2001). Comparison of the plasma density observations conducted using independent techniques and facilities for all seasons of two solar minima with the simulations shows that the physical model which uses the near-exobase H density corresponding to the classic cold hydrogen approach provides excellent agreement with the observations. Applying the hot hydrogen concept reduces the near-exobase H density by a factor of a ∼ 3 to 4 at solar minimum (Figure 2 b, e of Qin and Waldrop paper). As follows from Kotov et al. (2023), with such small H density, simulated H+ ion and electron density in the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere would be at least twice smaller than the observations.
3 Conclusion
The existence of large amounts of hot H atoms near the exobase is not supported either by independent observations of H atom temperature and density or by numerous observations of hydrogen ion and electron densities conducted with different independent techniques.
Conducted near the exobase, in the exosphere, ionosphere, and plasmasphere for various levels of solar activity, seasons, and geographical regions, these independent observations provide comprehensive support for the classic cold hydrogen concept.
Author contributions
DK proposed the idea and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. OB participated in the manuscript editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
DK was supported by the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (project 0122U000187 “Investigation of variations in the ion composition of the topside ionosphere during the weak maximum of the 25th solar cycle”). OB was supported by the State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (project 0121U112420 “Investigation of machine learning applicability for detection of traveling ionospheric disturbances”).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to every Ukrainian soldier, volunteer, medic, and personnel of the emergency and municipal services, and to all the Ukrainians whose fearless resistance to the genocidal war conducted by Russia allows Ukrainian scientists to do their usual peaceful job. DK says great thank you to: The dedicated team at the Institute of Ionosphere for their excellent research and important findings despite the war conditions. Phil Richards, University of Alabama in Huntsville, for his continuous support, and for sharing his expertise and the Field Line Interhemispheric Plasma model. Richard Hodges, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, for providing expert advice on the exosphere and for his unique works that helped to argue key explanation in this paper. Edwin Mierkiewicz, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, and Susan Nossal, University of Wisconsin-Madison, for their support and for the unique investigations that provided key support for the conclusions in this paper. NI whose thorough analysis of the manuscript greatly improved the paper and made it more convincing and interesting.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Fox, J. L., and Sung, K. Y. (2001). Solar activity variations of the Venus thermosphere/ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (A10), 21305–21335. doi:10.1029/2001JA000069
Hodges, R. R. (1994). Monte Carlo simulation of the terrestrial hydrogen exosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. doi:10.1029/94JA02183
Kotov, D., Richards, P. G., Reznychenko, M., Bogomaz, O., Truhlík, V., Nossal, S., et al. (2023). Interhemispheric ionosphere-plasmasphere system shows a high sensitivity to the exospheric neutral hydrogen density: A caution of the global reference atmospheric model hydrogen density. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10, 1113706. doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1113706
Kotov, D. V., Richards, P. G., Bogomaz, O. V., Chernogor, L. F., Truhlík, V., Emelyanov, L. Y., et al. (2016). The importance of neutral hydrogen for the maintenance of the midlatitude winter nighttime ionosphere: evidence from IS observations at Kharkiv, Ukraine, and field line interhemispheric plasma model simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 7013–7025. doi:10.1002/2016JA022442
Kotov, D. V., Richards, P. G., Truhlík, V., Bogomaz, O. V., Shulha, M. O., Maruyama, N., et al. (2018). Coincident observations by the kharkiv IS radar and ionosonde, DMSP and arase (ERG) satellites, and FLIP model simulations: implications for the NRLMSISE-00 hydrogen density, plasmasphere, and ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 8062–8071. doi:10.1029/2018GL079206
Kotov, D. V., Richards, P. G., Truhlík, V., Maruyama, N., Fedrizzi, M., Shulha, M. O., et al. (2019). Weak magnetic storms can modulate ionosphere-plasmasphere interaction significantly: mechanisms and manifestations at mid-latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 9665–9675. doi:10.1029/2019JA027076
Kotov, D. V., Truhlík, V., Richards, P. G., Stankov, S., Bogomaz, O. V., Chernogor, L. F., et al. (2015). Night-time light ion transition height behaviour over the Kharkiv (50°N, 36°E) IS radar during the equinoxes of 2006–2010. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 132, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2015.06.004
Mierkiewicz, E. J., Roesler, F. L., and Nossal, S. M. (2012). Observed seasonal variations in exospheric effective temperatures. J. Geophys. Res. 117, A06313. doi:10.1029/2011JA017123
Panasenko, S. V., Kotov, D. V., Otsuka, Y., Yamamoto, M., Hashiguchi, H., Richards, P. G., et al. (2021). Coupled investigations of ionosphere variations over European and Japanese regions: observations, comparative analysis, and validation of models and facilities. Prog. Earth Planet Sci. 8, 45. doi:10.1186/s40645-021-00441-8
Picone, J. M., Hedin, A. E., Drob, D. P., and Aikin, A. C. (2002). NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (12), SIA. doi:10.1029/2002JA009430
Qin, J., and Waldrop, L. (2016). Non-thermal hydrogen atoms in the terrestrial upper thermosphere. Nat. Commun. 7, 13655. doi:10.1038/ncomms13655
Rairden, R. L., Frank, L. A., and Craven, J. D. (1986). Geocoronal imaging with Dynamics explorer. J. Geophys. Res. 91 (A12), 13613–13630. doi:10.1029/JA091iA12p13613
Zoennchen, J. H., Nass, U., and Fahr, H. J. (2015). Terrestrial exospheric hydrogen density distributions under solar minimum and solar maximum conditions observed by the TWINS stereo mission. Ann. Geophys. 33, 413–426. doi:10.5194/angeo-33-413-2015
Zoennchen, J. H., Bailey, J. J., Nass, U., Gruntman, M., Fahr, H. J., and Goldstein, J. (2011). The TWINS exospheric neutral H-density distribution under solar minimum conditions. Ann. Geophys 29, 2211–2217. doi:10.5194/angeo-29-2211-2011
Keywords: atomic hydrogen, exobase, hot atoms, cold atoms, independent observations
Citation: Kotov D and Bogomaz O (2023) Hydrogen atoms near the exobase are cold: independent observations do not support the hot exosphere concept. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10:1200959. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1200959
Received: 05 April 2023; Accepted: 27 September 2023;
Published: 10 October 2023.
Edited by:
Jaroslav Chum, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (ASCR), CzechiaReviewed by:
Nickolay Ivchenko, Royal Institute of Technology, SwedenCopyright © 2023 Kotov and Bogomaz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dmytro Kotov, ZG1pdHJ5a290b2ZmQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==