Justin H. Lee
Lauren W. Blum
Lunjin Chen- 1Space Sciences Department, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA, United States
- 2Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP), Boulder, CO, United States
- 3Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States
Large numbers of theory and observation studies have been conducted on electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves occurring in Earth’s magnetosphere. Numerous studies have shown that accurately specifying the ions of ionospheric origin and their composition can greatly improve understanding of magnetospheric EMIC waves, specifically their generation, their properties, and their effects on the magnetospheric plasma populations. With the launch and operations of multiple recent missions carrying plasma instrumentation capable of acquiring direct measurements of multiple ion species, we use this opportunity to review recent magnetospheric EMIC wave efforts utilizing these new assets, with particular focus on the role of ions of ionospheric origin in wave generation, propagation, and interaction with particles. The review of progress leads us to a discussion of the unresolved questions to be investigated using future modeling capabilities or when new missions or instrumentation capabilities are developed.
Introduction
Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves play a large role in magnetospheric dynamics, from heating of thermal plasma to scattering of radiation belt electrons into Earth’s atmosphere (see Thorne et al., 2006, and references therein). Figure 1A illustrates some of the main processes involving EMIC waves in Earth’s magnetosphere and Figure 1B provides an example of complex linear wave dispersion properties introduced when multiple ion species are present in the ambient plasma. Key to determining both wave properties themselves as well as wave impacts on various magnetospheric particle populations is a knowledge of the detailed plasma environment, including the cold ion populations that are often impossible to measure. In particular, ion density, temperature, and ion composition all play important roles in EMIC wave generation, propagation, and subsequent interaction with particles (Anderson et al., 1996; Anderson and Fuselier, 1994; Fuselier and Anderson, 1996; Kozyra et al., 1984, Gomberoff and Neira, 1983; Gomberoff et al., 1996; Gary et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2011; Silin et al., 2011, Lee et al., 2021, and references therein).
FIGURE 1. (A) Conceptual overview of processes related to EMIC waves generated in Earth’s magnetosphere including wave mode conversion enabled by heavy ion presence, the wave impacts on various particle populations, and manifestation of the wave impacts sometimes observed at low altitudes. (B) The dispersion relation (normalized frequency versus wave number) of cold plasma waves below the proton gyrofrequency in a uniform and magnetized plasma with ion composition 70% H+, 20% He+, 10% O+. Background magnetic field is 248 nT (corresponding to the equatorial magnetic field strength at L = 5) and background electron density of 50 cm−3 is used. Three values of wave normal angles, 0°, 45°, and 90° are represented by blue, green and red lines respectively. Characteristic frequencies (crossover, cutoff and bi-ion resonant frequencies) are denoted, with subscripts 1 and 2 representing frequencies between H+ and He+ gyrofrequencies and between O+ and He+ gyro frequencies, respectively. Calculation of those characteristic frequencies can be found elsewhere (e.g., Chen et al., 2014).
In the following sections, we outline recent progress towards understanding the influence of ions of ionospheric origin on EMIC waves both through theoretical, modeling and observational studies. Recent space missions, with improved data quality and data processing tools, have allowed for significant progress characterizing the occurrence and distribution of magnetospheric EMIC waves and the hot proton free energy source that is expected to drive wave generation. However, puzzles remain for developing a more complete understanding of EMIC wave generation and the effects of waves on magnetospheric particles, many centered around measurement challenges and a lack of routine observations of the cold ion properties including the ion mass composition. These measurements are needed to characterize the variability of abundances of cold and hot ionospheric-originating ions in different magnetospheric regions so that improved understanding can be developed on how they impact wave generation and subsequent wave-particle interactions. Progress as well as remaining questions and challenges on these topics are presented in Recent Progress and Challenges Section, and future needs or opportunities discussed in Discussion and Future Opportunities Section.
Recent Progress and Challenges
Wave Generation and Properties
The large number of satellite missions flying magnetometers are supporting continued studies of EMIC wave properties throughout Earth’s magnetosphere. The analysis methods utilized have become somewhat standardized across studies and capable computing systems allow for efficient processing of large spacecraft datasets. Following coordinate transformation routines, most EMIC wave studies rely on Fourier analysis to derive wave power and polarization spectra in the frequency-time domain for interpretation of the wave emissions properties needed to identify the occurrence and properties of EMIC waves. Low wave normal angle coupled with polarization spectra that rotate left-handed with respect to the dominant geomagnetic field component are typically used to identify the presence and generation region of EMIC waves. This is because of linear dispersion theory and solutions that indicate the growth rate of EMIC waves typically maximizes for the left-handed circularly polarized (parallel propagating) mode (Gary et al., 2012 and references therein). When electric field measurements are also available, calculations of the Poynting vector properties in time or frequency domains are applicable to identifying possible wave generation regions and the properties of wave energy (e.g. Vines et al., 2019 and references therein).
Although magnetometer and electric field instrumentation continue to improve in capability, the role of the superposition of multiple wave packets that results in constructive/destructive interference to the detriment of wave analysis methods will continue to complicate analysis of wave properties and applications of the derived properties to investigating theories on wave generation (and propagation, discussed in a later section). For example, recent statistical and case studies showed that experimentally measured EMIC waves do not always have left-hand circular polarization and are often more linear or right-hand polarized, particularly on the morning side of the magnetosphere (Min et al., 2012; Allen et al., 2015; Allen et al., 2016; Saikin et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2019). Although EMIC wave polarization properties can evolve from left-handed to linear and then to right-handed during propagation through a region where wave frequency matches crossover frequencies (as noted by ωcr1 and ωcr2 in Figure 1B), wave superposition can be another reason for the observed linear polarized wave spectra (Denton et al., 1996; Anderson et al., 1996; Lee and Angelopoulos, 2014a). But EMIC waves may also be generated with linear polarization under specific plasma conditions (Denton et al., 1992), the presence of cold heavy ions can favor the conversion of left-handed waves to linear (Hu et al., 2010), and cold proton presence may enable self-consistent generation of oblique EMIC waves with linear polarization (Toledo-Redondo et al., 2021). Verifying the occurrence of superposed wave packets is needed to futher clarify the conditions when linear EMIC waves can grow preferentially. The importance of this extends to multi-satellite wave analysis methods (e.g. Balikhin et al., 2003; Bellan, 2016; Vines et al., 2021), in which recent studies showed superposed waves limit the effectiveness of multi-satellite wave vector determination (Lee et al., 2019, Lee et al., 2021). The application of wave properties not accounting for superposition can lead to misrepresentation of true wave properties, and this can be propagated when deriving particle pitch angle diffusion coefficients, for example, leading to inaccurate predictions of the effectiveness of EMIC waves in diffusing particles from high to low pitch angles. Future studies should identify and treat time intervals when superposed waves are likely with caution to ensure accurate characterization of EMIC waves.
Improvements to plasma instruments with ion mass discrimination have allowed for a small number of studies to consider and apply multiple ion species measurements to improve understanding of EMIC wave generation. Overall, there continue to be differing methods of utilization of available particle data for investigating EMIC wave generation. Adequate energy range of plasma instrumentation is needed to cover the ions and electrons relevant for EMIC wave studies. As summarized in Table 1, this is a broad energy range because EMIC waves can interact with cold and hot ions as well as cold/thermal and relativistic electrons. For hot, energetic (>keV) ions, a sufficiently broad instrument energy range supports accurate specification of the hot ion free energy for wave generation or the hot heavy ions that may damp the waves. Recent studies combining ion measurements from multiple instruments onboard a Van Allen Probes spacecraft have been able to calculate full ion moments (from ∼1 eV to 600 keV), for comparison to quasilinear theory for EMIC wave growth (Yue et al., 2019; Noh et al., 2018, Noh et al., 2021). While these studies investigated the relationship of EMIC wave occurrence relative to the hot proton anisotropy, they focused on the role of protons and temperature anisotropy for providing free energy needed for wave instability. This is despite theory showing the importance of heavier ion species in defining the band structure as well as wave growth in each band generally organized by the heavy ion species (e.g. Kozyra et al., 1984; Denton et al., 2014). Provided the cyclotron resonance condition is met, it is possible that heavy ion species with temperature anisotropy could also contribute to wave growth below the corresponding ion gyrofrequency. These contributions of heavy ions to EMIC wave occurrence are pending additional investigation. Investigations of ion composition data with improved availability have shown how the relative flux of inner magnetosphere heavy ions changes with geomagnetic activity (Kistler et al., 2006; Kistler et al., 2016). Similar trends were seen in the outer magnetosphere (Lee et al., 2021). Future efforts will continue to improve understanding how evolution of cold and energetic heavy ions with solar/geomagnetic activity affects EMIC wave growth. The cold ion species, however, are often problematic to characterize.
TABLE 1. Summary of relevant desired particle and field observations for future EMIC wave studies, including instrument challenges for making these measurements.
Measurements of the cold ion species supports the derivation of accurate cold (0–10 s eV) ion moments of solar wind and ionospheric ion species for testing theory of linear wave growth. Routine cold ion measurements are necessary for accurately determining the times or magnetospheric regions where warm plasma effects influence wave growth and subsequent wave-particle interactions, as explored in modeling studies (Chen et al., 2011; Silin et al., 2011). But because of spacecraft positive charging effects, cold ion measurements are often challenging to make and are not available routinely. Active spacecraft potential control (ASPOC) is one method that helps mitigate the positive charging effect (Torkar et al., 2016), decreasing the amount of positive charging but not completely neutralizing it. Few eV ions remain unmeasured most of the time except when plasma bulk flows and ULF waves assist with accelerating these ions above the remnant spacecraft potential energy (André and Cully, 2012; Engwall et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2012, Lee et al., 2019, Lee et al., 2021). Continued efforts (Zurbuchen and Gershman, 2016; Toledo-Redondo et al., 2019; Barrie et al., 2019) to overcome this charging problem can improve understanding of the contribution of cold ions and their mass composition to the generation of EMIC waves and their properties. In the absence of wave measurements themselves, a linear theory proxy based on a proton-electron plasma and the bulk plasma parameters that can be extracted from spacecraft datasets has helped identify when EMIC wave growth is likely (Allen et al., 2016; Blum et al., 2009, Blum et al., 2012); though this proxy method does not always yield agreement, predicting wave growth when no waves were observed (Lin et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). It may be possible that future improvements to this proxy through inclusion of additional measurable ion population parameters can be helpful for interpreting EMIC wave generation.
In addition to EMIC waves characterized in terms of linear theory, triggered (or rising tone) nonlinear EMIC wave emissions are known to evolve out of the linear instability and associated cut-off wave frequencies determined by the ion composition (Omura et al., 2010). The subsequent nonlinear growth of the triggered emissions at their source region is determined by the frequency sweep rate that is proportional to the wave group velocity, which is again influenced by the ion composition. A few studies on observations or simulations of triggered emissions have used estimated or assumed ion composition to investigate the magnetospheric conditions supporting these nonlinear emissions (Pickett et al., 2010; Shoji and Omura, 2013; Grison et al., 2013; Nakamura et al., 2015; Grison et al., 2016, Nakamura et al., 2016). It remains unknown the role of ion composition in nonlinear wave evolution. More frequent and accurate measurements of comprehensive ion composition will support additional studies of nonlinear growth of EMIC waves.
Finally, recent studies have utilized multipoint measurements and simultaneous wave, hot, and cold plasma measurements to explore the spatio-temporal structure of EMIC wave active regions and their relation to plasma structures (Engebretson et al., 2018; Blum et al., 2017). Coordinated EMIC wave measurements at multiple local times, radial distances, as well as on the ground have revealed that these waves are often radially narrow but extended in time and azimuth (e.g. Mann et al., 2014; Paulson et al., 2014; Blum et al., 2020). Direct associations between EMIC waves and hot ion structures, such as particle injections, have been found across the dusk-side magnetosphere (Remya et al., 2018; Jun et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Blum et al., 2015; Remya et al., 2020), whereas other studies observe EMIC waves well-confined to cold plasma density enhancements and gradients (Usanova et al., 2014; Tetrick et al., 2017; Blum et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2019). Coordinated multipoint measurements and improved orbital configurations aid in mapping out the spatio-temporal properties of EMIC waves, needed for quantifying their impact on energetic particle populations as discussed more in Wave Effects Section , while comprehensive wave and plasma measurements can help reveal the drivers of the wave spatial and temporal properties.
Wave Propagation
EMIC waves of magnetospheric origin have been measured by ground magnetometers and fall into the Pc1-2 (continuous pulsation) frequency range. Magnetically conjugate observations have confirmed that equatorially-generated EMIC waves can propagate all the way to the ground (e.g. Usanova et al., 2008, and references therein). But this is not always the case, particularly during the main phase of geomagnetic storms when a distinct lack of Pc1-2 waves is observed at ground magnetometers compared to in situ observations (Engebretson et al., 2008; Posch et al., 2010). Ray tracing of EMIC waves suggests as waves propagate from the equator, the waves should become oblique and eventually reflect at middle magnetic latitude when the wave frequency falls just below the bi-ion hybrid resonant frequency (Rauch and Roux, 1982; Horne and Thorne 1990; Rönnmark and André, 1991; Chen et al., 2014). This bi-ion hybrid resonant frequency (e.g., ωbi1 and ωbi2 depicted in Figure 1B) is also known as the Buchsbaum resonance (Buchsbaum, 1960) and defines a forbidden region of wave propagation. But several potential mechanisms can explain the access of EMIC waves to low altitudes. First, full wave simulations (e.g. Kim and Johnson, 2016) suggest waves can tunnel through the evanescent region via mode conversion at locations where the wave frequency matches the local crossover frequency (e.g. ωcr1 and ωcr2 depicted in Figure 1B). Second, left-handed O+ band EMIC waves can propagate along the field line toward higher magnetic field regions without being subject to bi-ion hybrid resonance (since O+ ions are the presumed heaviest ions in the magnetosphere). Third, density irregularities and gradients, such as at the plasmapause (e.g. Chen et al., 2009; de Soria-Santacruz et al., 2013) can keep the EMIC wave normal more or less aligned with the magnetic field, and therefore avoid encountering of the bi-ion hybrid resonance which occurs at perpendicular propagation. Further investigations of the plasma conditions resulting in EMIC wave propagation to the ground, and their dependence on location and geomagnetic activity, will enable us to improve understanding of these phenomena.
Based on known and theorized properties of propagating EMIC waves, satellite wave observations have also been used to infer information about the local plasma environment. The propagation of EMIC waves to and across local crossover frequencies in a multi-ion plasma can allow waves to achieve linear or right-handed polarization. Thus, under certain assumptions on wave generation, wave properties from Fourier spectra and the possibility of crossover frequencies enabling mode-conversion during propagation have been used to infer the ion composition or presence of minor ion species in Earth’s magnetosphere (Min et al., 2015; Miyoshi et al., 2019; Engebretson et al., 2018; Bashir and Ilie, 2021). Wave modeling and mode conversion at the bi-ion hybrid resonance has also been presented as a method to derive magnetospheric ion composition (E. H. Kim et al., 2015). While event studies have suggested the presence of He++ (Engebretson et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019), N+ (Bashir and Ilie, 2021), as well as the more typically assumed O+ and He+ species, direct observations of these ions are often lacking, posing challenges for verification of these techniques to infer ion composition from the properties of propagated EMIC waves. Very few examples exist showing that the ion composition derived using wave spectra in the vicinity of the crossover frequency is consistent with the measured ion composition due to the cold ion populations being partially hidden from detectors because of spacecraft positive charging (Fuselier and Anderson, 1996; Lee and Angelopoulos, 2014b; Lee et al., 2019). Because of various complexities in wave analysis, it would be helpful to future EMIC wave studies to consider particle measurements to support interpretation of wave propagation and mode conversion.
Wave Effects
EMIC waves can interact with a broad range of particle populations in the inner magnetosphere, through cyclotron or Landau resonance as well as non-resonant or nonlinear interactions. Through these interactions, the waves can impact electrons or ions spanning orders of magnitude in energy. We focus on the wave effects on energetic particles in this review and refer the reader to a companion paper dedicated to interactions of EMIC waves with thermal plasmas (M. E. Usanova, submitted to this issue, Energy exchange between EMIC waves and thermal plasma: from theory to observations).
It is known that the anomalous resonance condition betweenleft-handed EMIC waves and electrons requires electrons (usually in the relativistic energy range) to overtake the EMIC waves so that in the frame of moving electron gyrocenter the wave polarization is seen as right-handed and the Doppler-shifted wave frequency matches the electron gyrofrequency (conceptualized in Figure 1A). For such a condition to be satisfied, EMIC waves with sufficiently large wavenumber (kz = Ωce/vz) are required. In the cold plasma limit with sufficient He+ ions, He+ band waves just below the He+ gyrofrequency attain large wave numbers, and therefore have been proposed as a potential candidate for resonating with relativistic electrons and producing scattering loss (Lyons and Thorne, 1972; Summers and Throne, 2003; Ukhorskiy et al., 2010; Thorne and Kennel, 1971; Shprits et al., 2016). Observational evidence of relativistic electron precipitation in association with EMIC waves has been reported by an increasing number of recent studies (e.g. Rodger et al., 2008; Li et al., 2014; Blum et al., 2015; Blum et al., 2019; Lessard et al., 2019; Qin et al., 2019; Sigsbee et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021). However, the cold plasma approximation may fail near the He+ gyrofrequency, and the warm plasma effect of He+ ions on wave growth should be considered. Spacecraft observations suggest warm plasma effects may be relevant in the inner magnetosphere (Lee et al., 2012) and the inclusion of warm plasma effects in modeling (Chen et al., 2011; Silin et al., 2011; Ni et al., 2018) shows that the excitation of He+ band waves near the He+ gyrofrequency tends to require reduced He+ ion density, and once generated, the warm plasma EMIC waves possess much smaller wavenumber than expected from cold plasma theory. Both points limit the capability of EMIC waves resonating with electrons ≤1 MeV. At the same time, sub-MeV electron precipitation associated with EMIC waves has been reported with statistical lower cut off energy down to 300 keV (e.g. Hendry et al., 2020; Capannolo et al., 2019). Many of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite observations used to infer the electron precipitation caused by EMIC waves have not been energy-resolved and future direct measurements will continue to help characterize the spectrum of energetic electrons impacted by EMIC waves (cf. Hendry et al., 2016). Nonetheless, the unexpectedly low (∼100 s keV) energy of electrons precipitated by EMIC wave interactions may be explained by a non-resonant scattering mechanism (Chen et al., 2016), when the electrons below the cyclotron resonant energy are also subject to effective scattering due to spatial structure of the EMIC wave packet. Another potential mechanism proposed by Denton et al., 2019 is the resonant interaction of electrons with low amplitude short-wavelength EMIC waves in the H+ band (with frequency above the He+ gyrofrequency), though it is unclear how often magnetospheric conditions allow for the generation of such waves. Observations of two components of electric field and three components of magnetic field have been applied to estimate wavenumber of EMIC waves and statistical analysis showed that H+ band waves carry shorter wavenumber than He+ band waves, suggesting that H+ band waves are more likely to resonantly interact with MeV electrons and below (Chen et al., 2019a). Recent magnetospheric studies have observed evidence of EMIC wave scattering within the trapped MeV electron population near the magnetic equator, showing bite-outs at low pitch angles as well as local minima in phase space density profiles concurrent with EMIC wave activity (e.g. Bingley et al., 2019; Usanova et al., 2014; Shprits et al., 2017; Blum et al., 2020). Furthermore, nonlinear electron scattering due to EMIC waves manifested in fine-scale pitch angle distribution variation in association with EMIC waves (Zhu et al., 2020). The electron pitch angle distribution showed a reverse slope with a secondary flux peak near the loss cone at times when intense EMIC waves were present, which may be explained by competition of nonlinear phase bunching that transports electrons from low pitch angle to moderate pitch angle (Albert and Bortnik, 2009), nonlinear loss cone reflection (Su et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2016) that prevent electron scattering into the center of loss cone (e.g., zero pitch angle), and diffusive transport. These collective studies show that the frequency distribution of EMIC waves, as well as cold and warm ion populations, play major roles in determining the effectiveness of these waves in scattering and precipitation loss of energetic electrons to the atmosphere, and pitch-angle and energy-resolved measurements of energetic electrons both near the equator as well as at LEO can help confirm theoretical EMIC wave impacts on radiation belt populations. The future measurements important for characterizing the magnetospheric plasma, EMIC waves, and distribution of trapped electrons impacted by the waves are summarized in Table 1.
Although many studies discuss the interactions of EMIC waves with radiation belt electrons, the waves are also believed to have major effects on energetic protons in the ring current or plasma sheet, leading to their precipitation to the ionosphere where the precipitated protons may cause significant impacts to ionospheric electrodynamics. Frey et al., 2004 investigated subauroral morning proton spots (SAMPS) that were thought to be evidence of localized but intense interactions of EMIC waves with ring current protons in association with plasmaspheric refilling after geomagnetic storms. Fuselier et al., 2004 and Spasojevic and Fuselier (2009) also explored sub-auroral proton precipitation through use of IMAGE FUV images and their association with plasmaspheric plumes in the afternoon sector. Yahnin et al., 2007 showed conjugate ground-based observations with low altitude proton measurements to confirm the role of EMIC waves as the mechanism leading to these subauroral proton spots. Such precipitation images can help map out spatial and temporal evolution of EMIC wave active regions. In addition to localized interactions, modeling studies investigated cyclotron resonant interactions of EMIC waves with central plasma sheet protons (Cao et al., 2016) to indicate protons in this magnetosphere region can be efficiently scattered by EMIC waves. Model-data investigations of proton field-line curvature (FLC) scattering were unable to reproduce measurements of enhanced proton precipitating flux at low altitude and suggested that proton scattering by EMIC waves should be considered (Chen et al., 2019b). Additional modeling work investigating the combined effects of FLC and EMIC wave scattering showed that protons scattered by EMIC waves significantly impact ionospheric electrodynamics at afternoon to dusk MLTs comparable to the electron precipitation dominant between pre-midnight to morning MLTs (Zhu et al., 2021). The LEO satellites that provided the measurements of proton precipitating flux for the above studies could be improved by expanding the energy range and spectral resolution of instrumentation. In addition, orbital coverage and networking with existing missions could enable continued studies of the asymmetric input of energetic particle flux into the ionosphere that requires resolving temporospatial processes. These future efforts will enable us to understand the quantitative effects of magnetospheric EMIC waves on the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere system and how those effects change as functions of solar or geomagnetic activity and magnetosphere-ionosphere regions.
Discussion and Future Opportunities
A variety of recent missions have provided opportunities to launch scientific instrumentation and apply them to investigations of EMIC waves throughout Earth’s magnetosphere. An ideal measurement suite for investigating EMIC waves has been summarized in Table 1, along with challenges for future instrumentation. In addition to developments to necessary instrumentation, future space science missions could investigate various questions remaining related to the generation and effects of EMIC waves on magnetospheric plasma populations and potential subsequent effects on the ionosphere. To make significant progress on this topic, constellation-class missions are required. The waves should ideally be observed in their source regions in the magnetosphere and distributed members of the satellite constellation could then be able to observe how the generated waves:
1. Propagate from magnetospheric source regions to higher latitudes and often to the ground.
2. Impact trapped particle populations so that an improved quantitative understanding of EMIC wave effectiveness on particle scattering (and heating) can be developed.
3. May result in time-dependent impacts on the ionosphere and its electrodynamics.
Author’s Note
JL was employed by the company The Aerospace Corporation, a nonprofit corporation incorporated under the General Non-Profit Corporation Laws of the State of California.
Author Contributions
JL coordinated the overall preparation of the manuscript. JL and LB focused on the review of recent observations and LC focused on the review of recent developments in theory and modeling. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
JL acknowledges support from NASA Grant No. 80NSSC18K1378. LC acknowledges support of NASA Grants No’s. 80NSSC18K1224 and 80NSSC19K0283. LB’s contributions were supported by the NASA Grant No. 80NSSC21K0087. While preparing this review, the authors learned of the passing of S. Peter Gary (1939–2021). We will remember Peter for his many pioneering efforts in space plasma physics, with particular distinction in theory of plasma waves including electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves, as well as for his enthusiasm and mentorship.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Albert, J. M., and Bortnik, J. (2009). Nonlinear Interaction of Radiation belt Electrons with Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L12110. doi:10.1029/2009GL038904
Allen, R. C., Zhang, J.-C., Kistler, L. M., Spence, H. E., Lin, R.-L., Klecker, B., et al. (2016). A Statistical Study of EMIC Waves Observed by Cluster: 2. Associated Plasma Conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 6458–6479. doi:10.1002/2016JA022541
Allen, R. C., Zhang, J. C., Kistler, L. M., Spence, H. E., Lin, R. L., Klecker, B., et al. (2015). A Statistical Study of EMIC Waves Observed by Cluster: 1. Wave Properties. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 5574–5592. doi:10.1002/2015JA021333
Anderson, B. J., Denton, R. E., and Fuselier, S. A. (1996). On Determining Polarization Characteristics of Ion Cyclotron Wave Magnetic Field Fluctuations. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (A6), 13195–13213. doi:10.1029/96JA00633
Anderson, B. J., and Fuselier, S. A. (1994). Response of thermal Ions to Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. 99 (A10), 19413–19425. doi:10.1029/94JA01235
André, M., and Cully, C. M. (2012). Low-energy Ions: A Previously Hidden Solar System Particle Population. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, a–n. doi:10.1029/2011GL050242
Balikhin, M. A., Pokhotelov, O. A., Walker, S. N., Amata, E., Andre, M., Dunlop, M., et al. (2003). Minimum Variance Free Wave Identification: Application to Cluster Electric Field Data in the Magnetosheath. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (10), 1508. doi:10.1029/2003GL016918
Barrie, A. C., Cipriani, F., Escoubet, C. P., Toledo-Redondo, S., Nakamura, R., Torkar, K., et al. (2019). Characterizing Spacecraft Potential Effects on Measured Particle Trajectories. Phys. Plasmas 26, 103504. doi:10.1063/1.5119344
Bashir, M. F., and Ilie, R. (2021). The First Observation of N + Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028716. doi:10.1029/2020JA028716
Bellan, P. M. (2016). Revised Single‐spacecraft Method for Determining Wave Vector K and Resolving Space‐time Ambiguity. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 8589–8599. doi:10.1002/2016JA022827
Bingley, L., Angelopoulos, V., Sibeck, D., Zhang, X., and Halford, A. (2019). The Evolution of a Pitch‐Angle "Bite‐Out" Scattering Signature Caused by EMIC Wave Activity: A Case Study. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 5042–5055. doi:10.1029/2018ja026292
Blum, L. W., Artemyev, A., Agapitov, O., Mourenas, D., Boardsen, S., and Schiller, Q. (2019). EMIC Wave‐Driven Bounce Resonance Scattering of Energetic Electrons in the Inner Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 2484–2496. doi:10.1029/2018JA026427
Blum, L. W., Bonnell, J. W., Agapitov, O., Paulson, K., and Kletzing, C. (2017). EMIC Wave Scale Size in the Inner Magnetosphere: Observations from the Dual Van Allen Probes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1227–1233. doi:10.1002/2016GL072316
Blum, L. W., Halford, A., Millan, R., Bonnell, J. W., Goldstein, J., Usanova, M., et al. (2015). Observations of Coincident EMIC Wave Activity and Duskside Energetic Electron Precipitation on 18-19 January 2013. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5727–5735. doi:10.1002/2015GL065245
Blum, L. W., MacDonald, E. A., Clausen, L. B. N., and Li, X. (2012). A Comparison of Magnetic Field Measurements and a Plasma-Based Proxy to Infer EMIC Wave Distributions at Geosynchronous Orbit. J. Geophys. Res. 117, 5220. doi:10.1029/2011JA017474
Blum, L. W., MacDonald, E. A., Gary, S. P., Thomsen, M. F., and Spence, H. E. (2009). Ion Observations from Geosynchronous Orbit as a Proxy for Ion Cyclotron Wave Growth during Storm Times. J. Geophys. Res. 114, a–n. doi:10.1029/2009JA014396
Blum, L. W., Remya, B., Denton, M. H., and Schiller, Q. (2020). Persistent EMIC Wave Activity across the Nightside Inner Magnetosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087009. doi:10.1029/2020gl087009
Buchsbaum, S. J. (1960). Ion Resonance in a Multicomponent Plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 495–497. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.495
Cao, X., Ni, B., Liang, J., Xiang, Z., Wang, Q., Shi, R., et al. (2016). Resonant Scattering of central Plasma Sheet Protons by Multiband EMIC Waves and Resultant Proton Loss Timescales. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 1219–1232. doi:10.1002/2015JA021933
Capannolo, L., Li, W., Ma, Q., Chen, L., Shen, X. C., Spence, H. E., et al. (2019). Direct Observation of Subrelativistic Electron Precipitation Potentially Driven by EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 12711–12721. doi:10.1029/2019GL084202
Chen, H., Gao, X., Lu, Q., Tsurutani, B. T., and Wang, S. (2020). Statistical Evidence for EMIC Wave Excitation Driven by Substorm Injection and Enhanced Solar Wind Pressure in the Earth's Magnetosphere: Two Different EMIC Wave Sources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL090275. doi:10.1029/2020GL090275
Chen, L., Jordanova, V. K., Spasojević, M., Thorne, R. M., and Horne, R. B. (2014). Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Wave Modeling during the Geospace Environment Modeling challenge Event. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119, 2963–2977. doi:10.1002/2013JA019595
Chen, L., Thorne, R. M., and Bortnik, J. (2011). The Controlling Effect of Ion Temperature on EMIC Wave Excitation and Scattering. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, a–n. doi:10.1029/2011GL048653
Chen, L., Thorne, R. M., Bortnik, J., and Zhang, X. J. (2016). Nonresonant Interactions of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves with Relativistic Electrons. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 9913–9925. doi:10.1002/2016JA022813
Chen, L., Thorne, R. M., and Horne, R. B. (2009). Simulation of EMIC Wave Excitation in a Model Magnetosphere Including Structured High-Density Plumes. J. Geophys. Res. 114, a–n. doi:10.1029/2009JA014204
Chen, L., Zhu, H., and Zhang, X. (2019a). Wavenumber Analysis of EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5689–5697. doi:10.1029/2019GL082686
Chen, M. W., Lemon, C. L., Hecht, J., Sazykin, S., Wolf, R. A., Boyd, A., et al. (2019b). Diffuse Auroral Electron and Ion Precipitation Effects on RCM‐E Comparisons with Satellite Data during the 17 March 2013 Storm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 4194–4216. doi:10.1029/2019JA026545
de Soria-Santacruz, M., Spasojevic, M., and Chen, L. (2013). EMIC Waves Growth and Guiding in the Presence of Cold Plasma Density Irregularities. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1940–1944. doi:10.1002/grl.50484
Denton, R. E., Anderson, B. J., Ho, G., and Hamilton, D. C. (1996). Effects of Wave Superposition on the Polarization of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (A11), 24869–24885. doi:10.1029/96JA02251
Denton, R. E., Hudson, M. K., and Roth, I. (1992). Loss-cone-driven Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (A8), 12093–12103. doi:10.1029/92JA00954
Denton, R. E., Jordanova, V. K., and Fraser, B. J. (2014). Effect of Spatial Density Variation and O+ Concentration on the Growth and Evolution of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119, 8372–8395. doi:10.1002/2014JA020384
Denton, R. E., Ofman, L., Shprits, Y. Y., Bortnik, J., Millan, R. M., Rodger, C. J., et al. (2019). Pitch Angle Scattering of Sub‐MeV Relativistic Electrons by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 5610–5626. doi:10.1029/2018JA026384
Engebretson, M. J., Lessard, M. R., Bortnik, J., Green, J. C., Horne, R. B., Detrick, D. L., et al. (2008). Pc1-Pc2 Waves and Energetic Particle Precipitation during and after Magnetic Storms: Superposed Epoch Anal- Ysis and Case Studies. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A01211. doi:10.1029/2007ja012362
Engebretson, M. J., Posch, J. L., Capman, N. S. S., Campuzano, N. G., Bělik, P., Allen, R. C., et al. (2018). MMS, Van Allen Probes, GOES 13, and Ground‐Based Magnetometer Observations of EMIC Wave Events before, during, and after a Modest Interplanetary Shock. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 123, 8331–8357. doi:10.1029/2018JA025984
Engwall, E., Eriksson, A. I., Cully, C. M., André, M., Puhl-Quinn, P. A., Vaith, H., et al. (2009). Survey of Cold Ionospheric Outflows in the Magnetotail. Ann. Geophys. 27, 3185–3201. doi:10.5194/angeo-27-3185-2009
Frey, H. U., Haerendel, G., Mende, S. B., Forrester, W. T., Immel, T. J., and Østgaard, N. (2004). Subauroral Morning Proton Spots (SAMPS) as a Result of Plasmapause-Ring-Current Interaction. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A10305. doi:10.1029/2004JA010516
Fuselier, S. A., and Anderson, B. J. (1996). Low-energy He+and H+distributions and Proton Cyclotron Waves in the Afternoon Equatorial Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (A6), 13255–13265. doi:10.1029/96JA00292
Fuselier, S. A., Gary, S. P., Thomsen, M. F., Claflin, E. S., Hubert, B., Sandel, B. R., et al. (2004). Generation of Transient Dayside Subauroral Proton Precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A12227. doi:10.1029/2004JA010393
Gary, S. P., Liu, K., and Chen, L. (2012). Alfvén-cyclotron Instability with Singly Ionized Helium: Linear Theory. J. Geophys. Res. 117, a–n. doi:10.1029/2012JA017740
Gomberoff, L., Gratton, F. T., and Gnavi, G. (1996). Acceleration and Heating of Heavy Ions by Circularly Polarized Alfvén Waves. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (A7), 15661–15665. doi:10.1029/96JA00684
Gomberoff, L., and Neira, R. (1983). Convective Growth Rate of Ion Cyclotron Waves in a H+−He+and H+−He+−O+plasma. J. Geophys. Res. 88 (A3), 2170–2174. doi:10.1029/JA088iA03p02170
Grison, B., Darrouzet, F., Santolík, O., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., and Masson, A. (2016). Cluster Observations of Reflected EMIC-Triggered Emission. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 4164–4171. doi:10.1002/2016GL069096
Grison, B., Santolík, O., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Masson, A., Engebretson, M. J., Pickett, J. S., et al. (2013). EMIC Triggered Chorus Emissions in Cluster Data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 1159–1169. doi:10.1002/jgra.50178
Hendry, A. T., Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., Engebretson, M. J., Mann, I. R., Lessard, M. R., et al. (2016). Confirmation of EMIC Wave-Driven Relativistic Electron Precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 5366–5383. doi:10.1002/2015JA022224
Hendry, A. T., Santolik, O., Miyoshi, Y., Matsuoka, A., Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., et al. (2020). A Multi‐Instrument Approach to Determining the Source‐Region Extent of EEP‐Driving EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086599. doi:10.1029/2019GL086599
Horne, R. B., and Thorne, R. M. (1990). Ion Cyclotron Absorption at the Second Harmonic of the Oxygen Gyrofrequency. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 2225–2228. doi:10.1029/gl017i012p02225
Hu, Y., Denton, R. E., and Johnson, J. R. (2010). Two-dimensional Hybrid Code Simulation of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves of Multi-Ion Plasmas in a Dipole Magnetic Field. J. Geophys. Res. 115, a–n. doi:10.1029/2009JA015158
Jun, C. W., Yue, C., Bortnik, J., Lyons, L. R., Nishimura, Y., Kletzing, C., et al. (2019). A Statistical Study of EMIC Waves Associated with and without Energetic Particle Injection from the Magnetotail. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 433–450. doi:10.1029/2018JA025886
Kim, E. H., and Johnson, J. R. (2016). Full‐wave Modeling of EMIC Waves Near the He + Gyrofrequency. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 13–21. doi:10.1002/2015GL066978
Kim, E. H., Johnson, J. R., Kim, H., and Lee, D. H. (2015). Inferring Magnetospheric Heavy Ion Density Using EMIC Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 6464–6473. doi:10.1002/2015JA021092
Kim, H., Schiller, Q., Engebretson, M. J., Noh, S., Kuzichev, I., Lanzerotti, L. J., et al. (2021). Observations of Particle Loss Due to Injection‐Associated Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028503. doi:10.1029/2020JA028503
Kistler, L. M., Mouikis, C. G., Cao, X., Frey, H., Klecker, B., Dandouras, I., et al. (2006). Ion Composition and Pressure Changes in Storm Time and Nonstorm Substorms in the Vicinity of the Near-Earth Neutral Line. J. Geophys. Res. 111 (A11). doi:10.1029/2006ja011939
Kistler, L. M., Mouikis, C. G., Spence, H. E., Menz, A. M., Skoug, R. M., Funsten, H. O., et al. (2016). The Source of O+ in the Storm Time Ring Current. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121 (6), 5333–5349. doi:10.1002/2015ja022204
Kozyra, J. U., Cravens, T. E., Nagy, A. F., Fontheim, E. G., and Ong, R. S. B. (1984). Effects of Energetic Heavy Ions on Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Wave Generation in the Plasmapause Region. J. Geophys. Res. 89 (A4), 2217–2233. doi:10.1029/JA089iA04p02217
Lee, J. H., and Angelopoulos, V. (2014a). Observations and Modeling of EMIC Wave Properties in the Presence of Multiple Ion Species as Function of Magnetic Local Time. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119, 8942–8970. doi:10.1002/2014JA020469
Lee, J. H., and Angelopoulos, V. (2014b). On the Presence and Properties of Cold Ions Near Earth's Equatorial Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119, 1749–1770. doi:10.1002/2013JA019305
Lee, J. H., Chen, L., Angelopoulos, V., and Thorne, R. M. (2012). THEMIS Observations and Modeling of Multiple Ion Species and EMIC Waves: Implications for a Vanishing He+stop Band. J. Geophys. Res. 117, a–n. doi:10.1029/2012JA017539
Lee, J. H., Turner, D. L., Toledo‐Redondo, S., Vines, S. K., Allen, R. C., Fuselier, S. A., et al. (2019). MMS Measurements and Modeling of peculiar Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11622–11631. doi:10.1029/2019GL085182
Lee, J. H., Turner, D. L., Vines, S. K., Allen, R. C., Toledo‐Redondo, S., Bingham, S. T., et al. (2021). Application of Cold and Hot Plasma Composition Measurements to Investigate Impacts on Dusk‐Side Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028650. doi:10.1029/2020JA028650
Lessard, M. R., Paulson, K., Spence, H. E., Weaver, C., Engebretson, M. J., Millan, R., et al. (2019). Generation of EMIC Waves and Effects on Particle Precipitation during a Solar Wind Pressure Intensification with B Z >0. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 4492–4508. doi:10.1029/2019JA026477
Li, Z., Millan, R. M., Hudson, M. K., Woodger, L. A., Smith, D. M., Chen, Y., et al. (2014). Investigation of EMIC Wave Scattering as the Cause for the BARREL 17 January 2013 Relativistic Electron Precipitation Event: A Quantitative Comparison of Simulation with Observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 8722–8729. doi:10.1002/2014GL062273
Lin, R.-L., Zhang, J.-C., Allen, R. C., Kistler, L. M., Mouikis, C. G., Gong, J.-C., et al. (2014). Testing Linear Theory of EMIC Waves in the Inner Magnetosphere: Cluster Observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119 (2), 1004–1027. doi:10.1002/2013JA019541
Lyons, L. R., and Thorne, R. M. (1972). Parasitic Pitch Angle Diffusion of Radiation belt Particles by Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5608–5616. doi:10.1029/ja077i028p05608
Mann, I. R., Usanova, M. E., Murphy, K., Robertson, M. T., Milling, D. K., Kale, A., et al. (2014). Spatial Localization and Ducting of EMIC Waves: Van Allen Probes and Ground-Based Observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 785–792. doi:10.1002/2013GL058581
Min, K., Lee, J., Keika, K., and Li, W. (2012). Global Distribution of EMIC Waves Derived from THEMIS Observations. J. Geophys. Res. 117, a–n. doi:10.1029/2012JA017515
Min, K., Liu, K., Bonnell, J. W., Breneman, A. W., Denton, R. E., Funsten, H. O., et al. (2015). Study of EMIC Wave Excitation Using Direct Ion Measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 2702–2719. doi:10.1002/2014JA020717
Miyoshi, Y., Matsuda, S., Kurita, S., Nomura, K., Keika, K., Shoji, M., et al. (2019). EMIC Waves Converted from Equatorial Noise Due to M/Q = 2 Ions in the Plasmasphere: Observations from Van Allen Probes and Arase. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5662–5669. doi:10.1029/2019GL083024
Nakamura, S., Omura, Y., and Angelopoulos, V. (2016). A Statistical Study of EMIC Rising and Falling Tone Emissions Observed by THEMIS. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 121, 8374–8391. doi:10.1002/2016JA022353
Nakamura, S., Omura, Y., Shoji, M., Nosé, M., Summers, D., and Angelopoulos, V. (2015). Subpacket Structures in EMIC Rising Tone Emissions Observed by the THEMIS Probes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 7318–7330. doi:10.1002/2014JA020764
Ni, B., Cao, X., Shprits, Y. Y., Summers, D., Gu, X., Fu, S., et al. (2018). Hot Plasma Effects on the Cyclotron-Resonant Pitch-Angle Scattering Rates of Radiation Belt Electrons Due to EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 21–30. doi:10.1002/2017GL076028
Noh, S.-J., Lee, D.-Y., Choi, C.-R., Kim, H., and Skoug, R. (2018). Test of Ion Cyclotron Resonance Instability Using Proton Distributions Obtained from Van Allen Probe-A Observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 123, 6591–6610. doi:10.1029/2018JA025385
Noh, S. J., Lee, D. Y., Kim, H., Lanzerotti, L. J., Gerrard, A., and Skoug, R. M. (2021). Upper Limit of Proton Anisotropy and its Relation to Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Inner Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028614. doi:10.1029/2020JA028614
Omura, Y., Pickett, J., Grison, B., Santolik, O., Dandouras, I., Engebretson, M., et al. (2010). Theory and Observation of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Triggered Emissions in the Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A07234. doi:10.1029/2010JA015300
Paulson, K. W., Smith, C. W., Lessard, M. R., Engebretson, M. J., Torbert, R. B., and Kletzing, C. A. (2014). In Situ observations of Pc1 Pearl Pulsations by the Van Allen Probes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1823–1829. doi:10.1002/2013GL059187
Pickett, J. S., Grison, B., Omura, Y., Engebretson, M. J., Dandouras, I., Masson, A., et al. (2010). Cluster Observations of EMIC Triggered Emissions in Association with Pc1 Waves Near Earth's Plasmapause. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, a–n. doi:10.1029/2010GL042648
Posch, J. L., Engebretson, M. J., Murphy, M. T., Denton, M. H., Lessard, M. R., and Horne, R. B. (2010). Probing the Relationship between Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves and Plasmaspheric Plumes Near Geosynchronous Orbit. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A11205. doi:10.1029/2010ja015446
Qin, M., Hudson, M., Li, Z., Millan, R., Shen, X., Shprits, Y., et al. (2019). Investigating Loss of Relativistic Electrons Associated with EMIC Waves at Low L Values on 22 June 2015. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 4022–4036. doi:10.1029/2018JA025726
Rauch, J. L., and Roux, A. (1982). Ray Tracing of ULF Waves in a Multicomponent Magnetospheric Plasma: Consequences for the Generation Mechanism of Ion Cyclotron Waves. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 8191–8198. doi:10.1029/ja087ia10p08191
Remya, B., Sibeck, D. G., Halford, A. J., Murphy, K. R., Reeves, G. D., Singer, H. J., et al. (2018). Ion Injection Triggered EMIC Waves in the Earth's Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 123, 4921–4938. doi:10.1029/2018JA025354
Remya, B., Sibeck, D. G., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Kunduri, B., Halford, A. J., Reeves, G. D., et al. (2020). Association between EMIC Wave Occurrence and Enhanced Convection Periods during Ion Injections. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085676. doi:10.1029/2019GL085676
Rodger, C. J., Raita, T., Clilverd, M. A., Seppälä, A., Dietrich, S., Thomson, N. R., et al. (2008). Observations of Relativistic Electron Precipitation from the Radiation Belts Driven by EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L16106. doi:10.1029/2008GL034804
Rönnmark, K., and André, M. (1991). Convection of Ion Cyclotron Waves to Ion-Heating Regions. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 17573–17579. doi:10.1029/91JA01793
Saikin, A. A., Zhang, J. C., Allen, R. C., Smith, C. W., Kistler, L. M., Spence, H. E., et al. (2015). The Occurrence and Wave Properties of H + ‐, He + ‐, and O + ‐band EMIC Waves Observed by the Van Allen Probes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 7477–7492. doi:10.1002/2015JA021358
Shoji, M., and Omura, Y. (2013). Triggering Process of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Rising Tone Emissions in the Inner Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 5553–5561. doi:10.1002/jgra.50523
Shprits, Y. Y., Drozdov, A. Y., Spasojevic, M., Kellerman, A. C., Usanova, M. E., Engebretson, M. J., et al. (2016). Wave-induced Loss of Ultra-relativistic Electrons in the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Nat. Commun. 7 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1038/ncomms12883
Shprits, Y. Y., Kellerman, A., Aseev, N., Drozdov, A. Y., and Michaelis, I. (2017). Multi‐MeV Electron Loss in the Heart of the Radiation Belts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1204–1209. doi:10.1002/2016GL072258
Sigsbee, K., Kletzing, C. A., Faden, J. B., Jaynes, A. N., Reeves, G. D., and Jahn, J. M. (2020). Simultaneous Observations of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) Waves and Pitch Angle Scattering during a Van Allen Probes Conjunction. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 125, e2019JA027424. doi:10.1029/2019JA027424
Silin, I., Mann, I. R., Sydora, R. D., Summers, D., and Mace, R. L. (2011). Warm Plasma Effects on Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Wave MeV Electron Interactions in the Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A05215. doi:10.1029/2010JA016398
Spasojevic, M., and Fuselier, S. A. (2009). Temporal Evolution of Proton Precipitation Associated with the Plasmaspheric Plume. J. Geophys. Res. 114, a–n. doi:10.1029/2009JA014530
Su, Z., Zhu, H., Xiao, F., Zheng, H., Shen, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2012). Bounce-averaged Advection and Diffusion Coefficients for Monochromatic Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Wave: Comparison between Test-Particle and Quasi-Linear Models. J. Geophys. Res. 117, a–n. doi:10.1029/2012JA017917
Summers, D., and Thorne, R. M. (2003). Relativistic Electron Pitch-Angle Scattering by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves during Geomagnetic Storms. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1143. doi:10.1029/2002JA009489
Tetrick, S. S., Engebretson, M. J., Posch, J. L., Olson, C. N., Smith, C. W., Denton, R. E., et al. (2017). Location of Intense Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) Wave Events Relative to the Plasmapause: Van Allen Probes Observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122 (4), 4064–4088. doi:10.1002/2016ja023392
Thorne, R. M., Horne, R. B., Jordanova, V. K., Bortnik, J., and Glauert, S. (2006). “Interaction of Emic Waves with thermal Plasma and Radiation belt Particles,” in Magnetospheric ULF Waves: Synthesis and New Directions. Editors K. Takahashi, P. J. Chi, R. E. Denton, and R. L. Lysak (Washington, DC, USA: American Geophysical Union), 213–223. doi:10.1029/169GM14
Thorne, R. M., and Kennel, C. F. (1971). Relativistic Electron Precipitation during Magnetic Storm Main Phase. J. Geophys. Res. 76 (1), 4446–4453. doi:10.1029/JA076i019p04446
Toledo‐Redondo, S., Lavraud, B., Fuselier, S. A., André, M., Khotyaintsev, Y. V., Nakamura, R., et al. (2019). Electrostatic Spacecraft Potential Structure and Wake Formation Effects for Characterization of Cold Ion Beams in the Earth's Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 10048–10062. doi:10.1029/2019JA027145
Toledo-Redondo, S., Lee, J. H., Vines, S. K., Turner, D. L., Allen, R. C., André, M., et al. (2021). Kinetic Interaction of Cold and Hot Protons with an Oblique EMIC Wave Near the Dayside Reconnecting Magnetopause. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL092376. doi:10.1029/2021GL092376
Torkar, K., Nakamura, R., Tajmar, M., Scharlemann, C., Jeszenszky, H., Laky, G., et al. (2016). Active Spacecraft Potential Control Investigation. Space Sci. Rev. 199 (1‐4), 515–544. doi:10.1007/s11214‐014‐0049‐3
Ukhorskiy, A. Y., Shprits, Y. Y., Anderson, B. J., Takahashi, K., and Thorne, R. M. (2010). Rapid Scattering of Radiation belt Electrons by Storm-Time EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, a–n. doi:10.1029/2010GL042906
Usanova, M. E., Drozdov, A., Orlova, K., Mann, I. R., Shprits, Y., Robertson, M. T., et al. (2014). Effect of EMIC Waves on Relativistic and Ultrarelativistic Electron Populations: Ground-Based and Van Allen Probes Observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1375–1381. doi:10.1002/2013GL059024
Usanova, M. E., Mann, I. R., Rae, I. J., Kale, Z. C., Angelopoulos, V., Bonnell, J. W., et al. (2008). Multipoint Observations of Magnetospheric Compression-Related EMIC Pc1 Waves by THEMIS and CARISMA. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L17S25. doi:10.1029/2008GL034458
Vines, S. K., Anderson, B. J., Allen, R. C., Denton, R. E., Engebretson, M. J., Johnson, J. R., et al. (2021). Determining EMIC Wave Vector Properties through Multi-point Measurements: The Wave Curl Analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028922. doi:10.1029/2020JA028922
Vines, S. K., Allen, R. C., Anderson, B. J., Engebretson, M. J., Fuselier, S. A., Russell, C. T., et al. (2019). EMIC Waves in the Outer Magnetosphere: Observations of an Off‐Equator Source Region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5707–5716. doi:10.1029/2019GL082152
Yahnin, A. G., Yahnina, T. A., and Frey, H. U. (2007). Subauroral Proton Spots Visualize the Pc1 Source. J. Geophys. Res. 112, a–n. doi:10.1029/2007JA012501
Yuan, Z., Yu, X., Ouyang, Z., Yao, F., Huang, S., and Funsten, H. O. (2019). Simultaneous Trapping of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron and Magnetosonic Waves by Background Plasmas. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 1635–1643. doi:10.1029/2018JA026149
Yue, C., Jun, C. W., Bortnik, J., An, X., Ma, Q., Reeves, G. D., et al. (2019). The Relationship between EMIC Wave Properties and Proton Distributions Based on Van Allen Probes Observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 4070–4078. doi:10.1029/2019GL082633
Zhang, J.-C., Saikin, A. A., Kistler, L. M., Smith, C. W., Spence, H. E., Mouikis, C. G., et al. (2014). Excitation of EMIC Waves Detected by the Van Allen Probes on 28 April 2013. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4101–4108. doi:10.1002/2014GL060621
Zhu, H., Chen, L., Claudepierre, S. G., and Zheng, L. (2020). Direct Evidence of the Pitch Angle Scattering of Relativistic Electrons Induced by EMIC Waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085637. doi:10.1029/2019GL085637
Zhu, M., Yu, Y., Tian, X., Shreedevi, P. R., and Jordanova, V. K. (2021). On the Ion Precipitation Due to Field Line Curvature (FLC) and EMIC Wave Scattering and Their Subsequent Impact on Ionospheric Electrodynamics. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 126, e2020JA028812. doi:10.1029/2020JA028812
Keywords: EMIC waves, cold plasma, wave-particle interactions, cold ions, energetic particle precipitation
Citation: Lee JH, Blum LW and Chen L (2021) On the Impacts of Ions of Ionospheric Origin and Their Composition on Magnetospheric EMIC Waves. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8:719715. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2021.719715
Received: 02 June 2021; Accepted: 09 July 2021;
Published: 28 July 2021.
Edited by:
Cecilia Norgren, University of Bergen, NorwayReviewed by:
Sergio Toledo-Redondo, University of Murcia, SpainTieyan Wang, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2021 Lee, Blum and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Justin H. Lee, justin.h.lee@aero.org