Mark Vicars
James Milenkovic- Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
In the international contemporary discourse transgender individuals arguably have an increased presence within public media highlighting the visible diversity that constitutes the LGBTQI2S+ community. However, in response to the challenging of cisgendered normative assumptions there has been an unprecedented swathe of anti-trans measures executed through the frenzied repealing of rights and freedoms within the key arenas of legal, medical, sporting, and educative domains. This paper explores the intersections of pathologizing rhetoric that emplotted anti-trans and transphobic discourses within and across public consciousness. The quotidian presence of these discourses provoked in us a wondering about how evolving conceptual debate is constructing a trans inclusive global imaginary. In this paper we situate trans safety not as a singular concept, but rather a differentially experienced phenomenon that is related to and embedded in questions of bio power and privilege. As such, when we refer to a trans safety imaginary, we are not solely addressing protection from physical violence but also safeguarding against psychological and emotional vulnerability.
Introduction: (un)well-being and belonging
An intensification of anti-trans sentiment has occurred within recent years, with focal points occurring around gender-affirming care for children, trans women’s access to cis women’s sport and ‘single-sex’ spaces (bathrooms, changing rooms, and shelters). A slew of legislation negating the rights, freedoms, and bodily movements of trans individuals have been ratified with sense of displacement focused on specific incidents and events that epitomize feelings of not belonging, and at times of even not existing. At the time of writing this paper, 85 out of 586 bills impacting transgender people in America had passed; 376 bills were active (Trans Legislation Tracker, 2023). In Kentucky, Senate Bill 150 prohibits transgender students from accessing school bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their gender identity; obliges schools to out students who divulge their gender identity or sexual orientation to their parents; does not require the recognition of the students’ pronouns ‘that do not conform to a student’s biological sex’; and prohibits health care providers from prescribing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or perform ‘sterilizing surgery’ or gender-affirming surgery (Higdon, 2023). In Florida, House Bill 1,069 prevents school employees and students ‘to refer to another person using that person’s preferred personal titles or pronouns if [they] do not correspond to that person’s sex’, stating that: ‘a person’s sex is an immutable biological trait and that it is false to ascribe to a person a pronoun that does not correspond to such person’s sex’ (“CS/CS/HB 1069: Education”, 2023). Discussion and instruction on gender and sexuality is now prohibited in classrooms from prekindergarten (pre-K) to grade 8. The Bill also states that schools cannot withhold information from parents ‘affecting a student’s mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being’ (“CS/CS/HB 1069: Education”, 2023), which may include gender identity and/or sexual orientation. Equally, Florida’s Senate Bill 254 bestows powers to courts to remove children from their parents ‘if the child has been subjected to or is threatened with being subjected to sex-reassignment prescriptions or procedures’ (“CS/SB 254: Treatments for Sex Reassignment”, 2023). The Bill criminalizes access to gender affirming medications and surgeries to youths under 18 years, and makes their prescription a first degree misdemeanor for healthcare providers (“CS/SB 254: Treatments for Sex Reassignment”, 2023).
Challenges to trans people’s participation in social life are routinely underlined by medical/biological facticity. For example, in March 2023, the World Athletics Council announced that transgender women were precluded from female competitions if they had undergone male puberty (World Athletics, 2023). This is attributable to ‘certain aspects of male physiology’ (Bianchi, 2017, p. 229)—namely testosterone—being perceived as an unfair advantage leading to the outperformance of cis-women. Of course, biological discourse is already politicized (Zanghellini, 2020) and there is fervid debate on the definition of sex (Butler, 1990, 2004; Fausto-Sterling, 1993; Jackson and Scott, 2001; Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 2013; Štrkalj and Pather, 2021; Ritz and Greaves, 2022).
Anti-gender/trans campaigners have attempted to homogenize the heterogeneity of gender/trans theory(ies) through caricature. For instance, the frequently deployed terms gender ideology and trans ideology denote monolithic onto-epistemologies, when there are many diversified conceptualizations. For example, Butler’s (1990) notion of gender performativity positions gender not as an internal reality but something that is accrued and coalesces into an identity through repetition. Yet, gender performativity runs in opposition to some trans theorists’ gender episteme whereby ‘the body or the materiality of gender has a kind of stubborn persistence’ (Halberstam, 2018, p. 59). Halberstam (2018) critiques that viewing gender within a performative frame infers an illegitimacy of trans genders, ungrounded in the ‘real, material and authentic (Halberstam, 2018, p. 120).
This paper pursues an examination of the material effects resultant from the persistent dissemination of trans and gender criticality within the public arena, with particular attention being paid to how transgender individuals face over four times the likelihood of experiencing violent victimization compared to cisgender individuals (Arantes and Vicars, 2023) exploring trauma not only as a psychological phenomenon, but also a sociological occurrence (Thompson and Walsh, 2010). Bettcher (2013) offers a ‘multiple meaning view’ (p. 234) of transgender onto-epistemology, questioning ‘singular fixed meanings of gender terms’ (p. 247), i.e., man and woman, utilized by the dominant culture. A core aim of this paper, is to generate critical insight into how materially produced injustices perpetuate cycles of disadvantage for individuals who are trans identified or identifying. We have sought to express Onwuachi-Willig’s (2016) argumentation that the circulation of increasingly nocuous anti-trans discourses has mediated a cultural trans trauma, and in doing so deconstruct the intersectionality of power and positionality to critically articulate the totemic power of cisgendered heteronormative expression and oppression(s) relevant to a wider readership seeking an introduction and understanding of the topic.
To craft frameworks for trans and gender diversity requires a venture into uncharted territory where weaving new threads of meaning and significance are yet to happen. Underpinned by a social justice praxis the analysis and discussion components develop a thematic coherence to reimagine the capacities for trans-identified individuals to actively pursue emancipatory dialogue. While trans as a signifier falls short in articulating their gendered sense of self, both authors are cognizant that those whose gender identities, variances, and expressions are disparate from their sex assigned at birth are umbrellaed under trans (Kuper et al., 2012; Williams, 2014; Halberstam, 2018). Thinking with deconstruction, Jackson and Mazzei (2012) tell us that ‘[a]ssuming a deconstructive stance is to both use and trouble categories at the same time’ (p. 20). Author 2 moves in and across the trans signifier vis-à-vis strategic essentialism (Spivak, 1996 [1985]), purposely locating themself under trans for the purposes of disrupting the discursive regime of cisnormativity. Author 1 identifies as a gay/queer man and in travelling across lines of difference situates re-centering to reframe and remake meaning and articulate how the ecologies of positionality, power, relationships and affect and experienced and re-negotiated and infused with productive relationality. The conclusion of this paper considers how the wider epistemologies of the gender critical movement have emplotted anti-trans ideology in the media and political domain to produce narratives of (trans) cultural trauma in public discourse.
Articulations of (trans)gender and naming our researcher selves
Said (1975) has noted how culture exerts pressures and how it creates the environment and the community that allows people to feel they belong. Numerous cultures conceive of diverse expressions of gender and gendered presentation beyond the Western ontological assumption of the male/female binary. The Samoan Fa’afafine are assigned male at birth but do not inhabit the category of, nor are they recognized as, male (Vasey and Vander Laan, 2021). In India, hijras include those who are intersex or transgender, but also not male or female (Diehl et al., 2017). The muxes of Mexico are born male but adorn Zapotec garments and feminine accoutrements such as makeup and long hair (Diehl et al., 2017). The Indonesian waria are transgender women who may retain their male bodies whilst believing they ‘have the heart and soul of a woman’ (Toomistu, 2022, p. 73). The indigenous American two-spirit refers to persons born with both masculine and feminine spirits, and describes the intersection of gendered, sexual, and spiritual identities (Sheppard and Mayo, 2013).
It is therefore important to distinguish that terms like gender and trans(gender) are etymologically Western and operate within evolving historical, geographical, social, and cultural contexts. One must be cognizant of the monolingualism in inserting the foreign term(s) within non-English languages (Widerberg, 1998; Butler, 2021a). For instance, Widerberg (1998) reminds us that ‘where English is not the native language…there might be one…several or no words for gender’ (p. 134), and later: ‘it would seem that specific understandings of gender within most cultures cannot be properly translated; they get made into something else, into the understandings of gender that are implicit in the English language’ (p. 134). As terminologies have been formed within the colonial/modern world-system imagery and language there is an erasure of multiple subaltern subjectivities and different articulations of power and resistances. The paradox(es) of colonized identities, race and belonging inevitably confront sense and sensibilities of (un)belonging and place(lessness). Articulating counter narratives that contest a hegemonic narrative involves being reflective and reflexive of one’s researcher positionality owing to its emplottment within gendered, sexual, cultural, and racialized relations (Charmaz et al., 2018; Erickson, 2018). And ‘[a]lthough it is… not possible to name exhaustively all of the conscious and unconscious baggage that the researcher brings [to the research] [here, we offer a] comprehensive statement of [our] … epistemological orientation [and] social positionality’ (Scheurich, 1995, p. 249).
The anti-gender movement
It is useful to locate anti-trans rhetoric within the wider epistemologies of the gender critical movement. Opposing what is labelled gender ideology, this reactionary group includes the Right, religious conservatives, including the Catholic, Evangelical, and Pentecostal churches, and nationalist groups (Loughlin, 2018; Butler, 2021b; Hsu, 2022; Venegas, 2022). The Vatican, for example, is a staunch opponent of gender theory, enshrining the complementarianism of male and female and dimorphic sexuality as essential for the preservation of the traditional family (Loughlin, 2018; Butler, 2021b; Sosa, 2021; Venegas, 2022). In some countries, gender ideology is viewed as a cultural import that threatens values and ways of life (Paternotte and Kuhar, 2018; Sosa, 2021; Butler, 2021a): imperiling the family, masculinity, and femininity (Venegas, 2022). Anti-gender campaigners have regarded gender ideology as an insidious plot to impose ‘deviant and minority values’ (Paternotte and Kuhar, 2018, p. 9) on all, but particularly children.
The anti-gender campaign, which Butler (2021b) labels ‘nationalist, transphobic, misogynist, and homophobic’, has become a transnational mobilization, with exponents in Germany, Poland, Brazil, Italy, east Asia, Columbia, and Costa Rica (Butler, 2021b). Some have observed the goal of anti-gender movements as stripping basic human rights and democratic projects (Sosa, 2021; Butler, 2021b), for example, ‘intimate/sexual citizenship, including LGBT rights, reproductive rights, and sex and gender education’ (Paternotte and Kuhar, 2018, p. 8). This also includes feminism, same-sex marriage, same-sex adoption, abortion, non-essentialist discourses on gender and sexuality, and trans rights (Butler, 2021b; Venegas, 2022). Scholarship has traced the proliferation of trans-related matters within the contemporary zeitgeist. From trans women’s access to single-sex spaces (Herman, 2013; Schilt and Westbrook, 2015; Barnett et al., 2018; Davis, 2018), trans women’s participation in cis women’s sports (Sykes, 2006; Schultz, 2011; Love, 2014; Bianchi, 2017; Sailors, 2020), sex-change regret/de-transitioning (Temple Newhook et al., 2018; Hildebrand-Chupp, 2020; Slothouber, 2020; MacKinnon et al., 2021; Turban et al., 2021), trans/gender ideology allegedly indoctrinating children (Westbrook and Schilt, 2014; Pearce et al., 2020), the related trans social contagion and conversion of cisgender gay/lesbian youth to heterosexual trans youth (Marchiano, 2017; DeLay et al., 2018; Littman, 2018; Shrier, 2020; Soh, 2020; Ashley, 2020a,b), and the medicalization of children via puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones (Cohen-Kettenis et al., 2011; Ashley, 2019; Priest, 2019; Giordano and Holm, 2020; Zanghellini, 2020; Rew et al., 2021). This corpus of research speaks collectively to what has been labelled the culture war, the trans issue, and the woke agenda.
Emplotted anti-trans ideology
Goffman (1963) has highlighted how stigma is an enduring condition that can actively discredit individuals and he coined the phrase ‘stigmaphile’ to name the space of the stigmatized and ‘stigmaphobe’ to refer to the world of ‘normalcy’. Warner (2000) has noted how:
The stigmaphile space is where we find a commonality with those who suffer from stigma, and in this alternative realm learn to value the very things the rest of the world despises…The stigmaphobe world is the dominant culture, where conformity is endured through fear of stigma (p. 43).
The quotidian presence of these discourses provoked for us a wondering about bodies that are defined ‘by their potential to reciprocate or co-participate in the passages of affect’ (Seigworth and Gregg, 2010, p. 2), and how such ‘bodies are shaped by their dwellings and take shape by dwelling’ (Ahmed, 2006, p. 9). The nexuses between the epistemology of what Savage (2007) calls the outgroup—the Other—in the nineteenth century and contemporary anti trans discourse we have italicized within the below quotation:
[the] “scientific” reason as to why outgroups were inferior and other-than-human (legitimizing their destruction)[refusing the biological body, ‘reality’ denialism], as well as threatening (necessitating it)[a danger to women, children, society at large], but also a metaphorical representation, revolving around concepts of hygiene and purity [hormones and surgical evisceration the body], which fulfilled identical psychological necessities on a symbolic and populist level…the emergence of the nation-state [sweeping anti-trans legislature] allowed perpetrator groups to conceive of themselves as a unitary body [the anti-trans/gender movement] within defined geographical limits whose ideal state was one of “racial”[cisgendered] homogeneity. The indelible “wrongness” of an outgroup necessitated, in the eyes of perpetrators, the complete removal of that group from a geographically bounded territory [women’s bathrooms/sports, schools]; a particularly vicious medicalized representation of outgroups as a biological threat not only legitimized their disappearance, but directly motivated it’ (Savage, 2007 pp. 404–405).
Vis-à-vis the ever-tightening political, social, educative, and medical disciplinarity of cisgenderism Foucault’s (1988) biopolitics is a useful lens through which to consider how the State ‘wields its power over living beings’ (p. 160) and how the diaspora of anti-trans sentiment becomes material as a dialogical relation, and its affects becomes sticky (Ahmed, 2010). By this we mean any ontological assault on the ‘metaphysical “transgender” identity itself’ (Brown, 2021, p. 188) are socially rewarded and transgressive behaviors are punished’ (Green (1998, p. 26). We argue that the rescinding of rights and the implementation of restrictions removes trans people from the province of intelligibility, rendering them non-human and engenders a socially embedded trauma. Hamburger (2017) defines social traumas as those where ‘the whole of the social environment is under threat of persecution or actually experiencing persecution’ (p. 80). This is evinced through legislation directly affecting trans persons. Mizock and Lewis (2008) convey that transphobia and violence produce experiences of trauma and associated mental health issues. Risk factors correlated with trans trauma include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and acute stress disorder (Mizock and Lewis, 2008). To palliate this trauma, risky behaviors such as alcohol and substance abuse, and engaging in risky sexual practices might ensue (Hall and DeLaney, 2021). Equally, ‘[s]uicidal ideation in response to transphobic trauma is a critical concern for transgender individuals’ (Mizock and Lewis, 2008, p. 342). Richmond et al. (2012) add that ‘having a doctor ask inappropriate or invasive questions during a routine check-up or hearing a talk show host discuss trans issues in pathological or demeaning ways’ (p. 47) are trauma-triggering. Hall and DeLaney (2021) add that a ‘[transgender] individual who has problems using gender-segregated restrooms or who suffers relentless misgendering everywhere they go might avoid leaving the house altogether to minimize physical discomfort and instances of identity abuse’ (p.1279). Indeed, Butler (1990) identifies that when ‘[c]ertain humans are recognized as less than human…that form of qualified recognition does not lead to a viable life’ (p. 2).
Psycho-social trauma
Thompson and Walsh (2010) remind us of the significance of acknowledging the ‘psychological and sociological dimensions’ of trauma (p. 379). Theorizing with Heidegger’s (1962) being-towards-others as a framework to diverge from the localized and individual experience of trauma Thompson and Walsh (2010) to perceive trauma as a psycho-social phenomenon that embraces an: ‘intercorporeality and trans-subjectivity’ of bodies (Blackman and Venn, 2010, p. 8). Thinking with this scholarship not only speaks to the affective force that connects people (Helmsing, 2022) in ‘how the collective takes shape through the impressions made by bodily others’ (Ahmed, 2004, p. 27), but also directs attention to the wider politico-sociocultural relations (Thompson and Walsh, 2010). Onwuachi-Willig (2016) tells us that ‘cultural trauma arises because of a public or official sanctioning of the everyday denigration and subjugation of the subordinated group which reinforces a historicity that their rights are not protected and respected in society’ (pp. 336–337). Within this matrix, Erikson (1991) positions trauma as a mutual relation between a community through ‘situations where trauma becomes so widely shared within an existing collection of people that it dominates its imagery [and] governs the way members relate to one another’ (p. 461). It is apparent that trauma is not exogenous in its presentment. These affective states are triggered by ‘an assault from outside that break into the space one occupies as a person and damages the interior’ (Erikson, 1991, p. 455). These insidious traumas are ‘ongoing negative experiences associated with living as a member of an oppressed group’ (Szymanski and Balsam, 2011, p. 4). Likes waves protractedly wearing away at the cliff face, these traumas are ‘repetitive and enduring’ (Richmond et al., 2012, p. 47). Subsuming the atomized traumatogenic experiences of the trans body politic reveals a prevalent phenomenon: a (trans)cultural trauma.
A (trans)cultural trauma lens
Onwuachi-Willig (2016) employed a cultural trauma narrative framework to the responses of the black community to the acquittal of two white men for the murder of a 14 year-old African-American youth. Onwuachi-Willig (2016) reasons that there are three criteria which indicate the emergence of cultural trauma:
First, there must be a longstanding history of the routine harm, a history that essentially leads the subordinated group to expect nothing other than the routine yet cultural trauma—inducing injury. Second…the routine injury must have garnered the type of widespread media attention that makes a large audience, both within and outside the subordinated group, take notice of the routine occurrence…. Third…there must be public discourse about the meaning of the routine harm, a harm that usually occurs in the form of governmental or legal affirmation of the subordinated group’s marginal status. (p. 336)
We repurpose this analytic to examine habitual encounters of harassment, violence, and stigmatization, together with deleterious reportage of trans people and issues and the revoking of rights, and how these constitute a cultural trauma. We expatiate upon each of Onwuachi-Willig’s (2016) criterions below.
Criterion one: a longstanding history of the routine harm
Trans individuals, as liminal bodies outside of dominant cisgendered norms, have historically experienced sexualization, stigmatization, and psychopathologizing. The controversial phenomenon of autogynephilia—love of oneself as a woman—is one example. Psychologist Ray Blanchard coined autogynephilia in the late 1980s to describe how male-to-female transexuals (MtF) are either androphilic (homosexual transsexuals) or non-androphilic (aroused by the thought of becoming women) (Blanchard, 1989, 2005; Bailey and Triea, 2007). According to the autogynephilic thesis, auto gynephiles suffer a paraphilia, amongst which include criminal sexual behaviors like pedophilia (Serano, 2020). This diagnosis has offered opponents of trans rights recourse to pathologization in order invalidate trans women’s claim to womanhood (see Joyce, 2022). For example, Serano (2020) observes that autogynephilia has been weaponized within trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) to ‘insinuate that trans women are merely ‘sexually deviant men” (763–764). It may be argued that pathologization, undergirded by mechanisms of power, contributes to subjection—the formation of a subject (Butler, 1997).
In order to gain access to gender-affirming care including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-affirming surgeries, trans individuals must, oxymoronically, accede to the pathologizing diagnosis of gender identity disorder (GID)—now gender dysphoria (Butler, 2004; Mizock and Lewis, 2008; Serano, 2016). Submitting to this psychological condition, as Butler (2004) states, ‘imposes a model of coherent gendered life that demeans the complex ways in which gendered lives are crafted and lived (p. 5). Contagion rhetoric, reminiscent of that used in anti-gay, lesbian, and bisexual discourse, has been rearticulated towards trans people. Contagion’s metaphoric power resides in its likeness to ‘the process of cultural transmission’ (Davis, 2002, p. 830), where ideas and attitudes are disseminated amongst the culture. Equally, contagion, goaded by fear, bestows onus to the Other for incipient disease (Pernick, 2002). As put by Hsu (2022), ‘[t]he language of contagion stokes panic associated with viral epidemics, demanding an urgent governmental and social response’ (p. 65). This scaremongering is conveyed through the phenomenon—the ‘psychic epidemic’ (Ashley, 2020a, p. 783)—of rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD). This diagnosis posits that the deep dissatisfaction one feels about their gender emerges from a social contagion (Slothouber, 2020), with parents reporting online that their children, namely teenage girls, are suddenly, without their presentiment, becoming gender dysphoric (Littman, 2018). Littman’s (2018) work has garnered much criticism in terms of methodological rigor and interpretation (Restar, 2020; Bauer et al., 2022). Despite no clinical validation of this apparent subclass of gender dysphoria (World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH], 2018), this diagnosis is given credence by the anti-trans lobby to validate a pervasive contagion amongst adolescent girls (see Shrier, 2020; Joyce, 2022).
In educational domains, LGBTQIA2S+ students experience disproportionately higher instances of bullying, marginalization, depression, anxiety, suicidality, academic difficulties, and truancy compared to heterosexual, cisgendered pupils (Walton, 2005; Almeida et al., 2009; Garron and Logan, 2020; Shevlin and Gill, 2020; Schreuder, 2021). Trans students often feel unsafe within the ambivalent ambience of cisgenderism inscribed in schools (Ryan and Hermann-Wilmarth, 2013). Shevlin and Gill’s (2020) discourse analysis on parental attitudes towards the Safe Schools program—an inclusive and anti-bullying program in Australia—discerned transhysteria as particularly conspicuous. One participant demonstrated apprehension in their child being perceived as trans through the wearing of pants. Panic and hysteria materialized around the use of toilets, with anxieties around assault engineering the narrative of the innocent child in need of protection and the sexualizing transgender bogeyman (Shevlin and Gill, 2020). Moreover, children and adolescents’ transgender identities were met with incredulity, with parents ‘positioned as omniscient dictators of identity’ (Shevlin and Gill, 2020, p. 906).
Scholarship reveals that trans individuals experience disproportionate incidences of sexual, physical and verbal violence (Koyama, 2003; Butler, 2004; Mizock and Lewis, 2008; Bettcher, 2013; Perry and Dyck, 2014; Halberstam, 2018; Pearce et al., 2020; Stanley, 2021; Suh, 2022); have trouble accessing, and abuse within, the healthcare system (Kidd and Witten, 2007), securing employment and housing (Mizock and Lewis, 2008), and homelessness (Wilkinson, 2014). Priest (2019, p.46) has noted, ‘[t]ransgender youth are 10 times as likely to attempt suicide when compared to their cisgender peers’ and that trans individuals have suffered, and continue to suffer, from a ‘constellation of systemic oppressions’ (Kidd and Witten, 2007, p. 52).
Criterion two: widespread media attention
Concurrently, essentialist and pathologizing rhetoric from politicians, commentators, authors, and journalists resound and reverberate within and across public consciousness, leading to dis-information and the stoking of fears around what has been termed the trans debate. In March 2023, outspoken British gender/trans critic, Kellie-Jay Keen, toured Australia with her Let Women Speak tour. The Melbourne leg of the tour drew international attention when neo-Nazis, brandishing the banner DESTROY PAEDO FREAKS attended the event, performing the Sieg Heil salute on the steps of Parliament House (Kolovos, 2023).
Waites (2018) asks the question: ‘[w]hen, should we speak of identity erasure in global queer politics?’ (p. 44) as it is not only far right leaning, but voices also conveying antipathy. Splinter factions within the queer community have also voiced opposition to trans rights. In June 2023, a billboard reading ‘Let kids be kids’ was erected in Tasmania by trans and gender critical group LGB Tasmania (Woodall, 2023). This phrase refers to the purported indoctrination and sexualization of children vis-à-vis trans ideology. LGB Alliance Australia confers that ‘biological sex is observed in the womb and/or at birth and is not assigned’ and ‘current gender ideologies are pseudo-scientific and present a threat to people whose sexual orientation is towards the same sex…we believe that these ideologies are confusing and dangerous to children’ (LGB Alliance Australia, n.d.). Additionally, Binary Australia ‘campaigns for action against the radical gender ideology harming young people, women, and society’ (Binary Australia, n.d.), and ‘exists to challenge the aggressive agenda to remove sex from our society in the areas of education, health, military, business, politics and the law’ (Binary Australia, n.d.).
The anachronistic question what is a woman? has become a motto in anti-trans discourse propounded by some politicians in anti-trans discourse, having the metaphysical intent to question the materiality of the female body as ‘immobile, stable, coherent, fixed, pre-discursive, natural, and ahistorical’ (Moi, 1999, p. 4).
Criterion three: public discourse about the harm
The politico-socio-cultural landscapes within Australia are becoming increasingly fraught with hostile anti-trans rhetoric. In 2020, One Nation MP, Mark Latham, introduced the Educational Legislation Amendment (Parental Rights) Bill which sought to contest and de-realize trans students while ‘prohibit[ing] the teaching of the ideology of gender fluidity to children in schools’ (Education Legislation Amendment (Parental Rights) Bill 2020 (Cth), n.d., p. 1). In 2022, former Liberal party candidate, Katherine Deves, worked with Tasmanian senator, Claire Chandler, in developing what became known as the Save Women’s Sport Bill (“Sex Discrimination and other Legislation Amendment (Save Women’s Sport) Bill 2022 Cth”, n.d.), which sought to amend the Sex Discrimination Act to segregate women’s sports on the basis of biological sex.
In the U.S., department store Target removed particular Pride month merchandise from shelves following hostile responses from shoppers’ and physical confrontations with staff (D’Innocenzio, 2023). Such items include bathers/swimmers that allow pre-operative or trans women who do not desire the removal of their penis a provision to tuck their genitals. Transgender influencer and TikTok personality, Dylan Mulvaney, attracted condemnation and threats of boycott for her partnership with Bud Light (Holpuch, 2023), makeup brand Maybelline (Picchi, 2023), and for advertising women’s Nike apparel (Zilber, 2023). Former U.S. president Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential election pitch featured a platitude of proposed restrictive measures against transgender individuals—notably gender affirming care for trans children, including access to puberty blockers and gender affirmation surgeries. Additionally, Trump averred that he will promote schools championing the heteronormative family unit and introduce a Bill that recognizes male and female as the only genders recognized in the U.S. (Seitz-Wald and Yurcaba, 2023). Four years earlier in 2019, the Trump government officially forbad trans people from enlisting in military service (Jackson and Kube, 2019).
In December 2022, Scotland passed their Gender Recognition Reform Bill, which sought to streamline the process for trans people to legally change their gender. The Bill removed the need for the pathologizing diagnosis of gender dysphoria, reduced the age of eligibility for a gender recognition certificate from 18-to 16–17-year-old, and reduced the timeframe where one must live fulltime in their gender from two years to three months (Brooks, 2022). In January 2023, however, the U.K. government vetoed the Bill on the grounds of its discrepancies with the Equality Act 2010, notably around the site of sex as a protected characteristic (Equality Hub, Government Equalities Office, and Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland, 2023). In June 2023, England’s National Health Service (NHS) rescinded access to puberty blockers for youths questioning their gender, stating: ‘NHS England would in future only commission GnRH analogues [puberty suppressing hormones] in the context of a formal research protocol’ (NHS England, 2023a), and: ‘outside of a research setting, puberty suppressing hormones should not be routinely commissioned for children and adolescents who have gender incongruence/dysphoria (NHS England, 2023b). A myriad of literature supports the routinization and efficacy of puberty suppressing drugs (Cohen-Kettenis et al., 2011; Ashley, 2019; Priest, 2019; Giordano and Holm, 2020; Riggs et al., 2020; Rew et al., 2021).
Conclusion—there are few words left with which to speak
The material-discursive effects of numerous anti-trans ideological enterprises resemble what Thompson and Walsh (2010) designate ‘an existential injury’ (p. 378): trauma experienced because of ‘an assault on the self’ (p. 378) which calls into question a person’s place within the fabric of social relations. Existential injuries destabilize the moorings of one’s existence, ‘inflict[ing] a wound to meaning’ (Nguyen, 2011, p. 28) and ‘severely altering how we see the world and how we make sense of it—in effect, destabilizing or even shattering our frameworks of meaning, our spiritual and existential foundations’ (Thompson and Walsh, 2010, p. 379). Whilst trans inclusion and inclusive practices have become a popular international buzzword, a scar is being left on the psyches of trans and gender diverse people who have been and are being traumatized by and in their realities and lived experiences. Research has examined the association between anti-trans sentiment and exterminationist politics (Owen, 2022) and Panter (2020) adduces that ideologies of erasure share the objective of attempting to exterminate ‘a specific targeted group who violate social, theological, and politically enforced heteronormative expectations’ (p. 81). Brown (2021) has described the systematic murders of trans people—particularly trans women—as ‘contain[ing] a genocidal logic…demonstrative of the eliminationist intent inherent to both life force atrocities and genocide’ (p. 186). This gains salience when considering 2021 had the highest murder rate of transgender people worldwide with 375 deaths (Powell, 2021; Trans respect versus Transphobia Worldwide, 2021), and in 2018, 167 transgender people were killed in Brazil alone (Brown, 2021).
Within this study, the intersections of power that converge on transgender lives shaped by the associated religious, political ideologies and their aligned authoritative bodies (Fyfield, 2022) in turn have impacted legal and legislative frameworks that provide a foundational ground of anti-trans operations (Cumming-Potvin and Martino, 2018). Media discourses which operate within their own intersections of power, influence emergent gender dysphoria and the resultant mental health impacts of inaction (Zaliznyak et al., 2021). In final summary, there is a growing need for allies to advocate for transgender and gender diverse individuals, as reactionary right-wing political forces in the anglosphere are trying and/or succeeding to pass and enforce discriminatory and disciplinary legislation (Vicars and Wolfe, 2023).
Author contributions
MV: Writing – original draft. JM: Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. JM is funded through an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective feelings: or, the impressions left by others. Theory Cult. Soc. 21, 25–42. doi: 10.1177/0263276404042133
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg and G. Seigworth, J (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham: Duke University Press.
Almeida, J., Johnson, R. M., Corliss, H. L., Molnar, B. E., and Azrael, D. (2009). Emotional distress among LGBT youth: the influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. J. Youth Adolesc. 38, 1001–1014. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9397-9
Arantes, J., and Vicars, M. (2023). Missing in action: Queer(y)ing the educational implications of data justice in an age of automation. Learn. Media Technol. 48, 213–225. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2023.2207141
Ashley, F. (2019). Watchful waiting doesn’t mean no puberty blockers, and moving beyond watchful waiting. Am. J. Bioeth. 19, W3–W4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1599466
Ashley, F. (2020a). A critical commentary on ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’. Sociol. Rev. 68, 779–799. doi: 10.1177/0038026120934693
Ashley, F. (2020b). Homophobia, conversion therapy, and care models for trans youth: defending the gender-affirmative approach. J. LGBT Youth 17, 361–383. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2019.1665610
Bailey, J. M., and Triea, K. (2007). What many transgender activists don’t want you to know: and why you should know it anyway. Perspect. Biol. Med. 50, 521–534. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0041
Barnett, B. S., Nesbit, A. E., and Sorrentino, R. M. (2018). The transgender bathroom debate at the intersection of politics, law, ethics, and science. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 46, 232–241. doi: 10.29158/jaapl.003761-18
Bauer, G. R., Lawson, M. L., and Metzger, D. L. (2022). Do clinical data from transgender adolescents support the phenomenon of “rapid onset gender dysphoria”? J. Pediatr. 243, 224–227.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.020
Bettcher, T. M. (2013). “Trans women and the meaning of “woman”” in The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings. eds. N. Power, R. Halwani, and A. Soble (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers), 233–250.
Bianchi, A. (2017). Transgender women in sport. J. Philos. Sport, 44, 229–242. doi: 10.1080/00948705.2017.1317602
Binary Australia (n.d.). Available at: https://www.binary.org.au/
Blanchard, R. (1989). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 177, 616–623. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198910000-00004
Blanchard, R. (2005). Early history of the concept of autogynephilia. Arch. Sex. Behav. 34, 439–446. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-4343-8
Brooks, L. (2022). Scottish government hails ‘historic day’ as MSPs pass gender recognition bill. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/dec/22/scotland-passes-bill-making-it-easier-for-people-to-legally-change-gender
Brown, H. M. (2021). “The forgotten murders: gendercide in the twenty-first century and the destruction of the transgender body” in Denial: The final stage of genocide? eds. J. Cox, A. Khoury, and S. Minslow (London: Routledge).
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. California: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (2021a). “Gender in translation: beyond monolingualism” in Why Gender? ed. J. Browne (California: Cambridge University Press), 15–37.
Butler, J. (2021b). Why is the idea of ‘gender’ provoking backlash the world over? The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2021/oct/23/judith-butler-gender-ideology-backlash
Charmaz, K., Thornberg, R., and Keane, E. (2018). “Evolving grounded theory and social justice inquiry” in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. eds. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. 5th ed (California: Sage), 729–776.
Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Schagen, S. E., Steensma, T. D., de Vries, A. L., and Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A. (2011). Puberty suppression in a gender-dysphoric adolescent: a 22-year follow-up. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40, 843–847. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9758-9
Cumming-Potvin, W., and Martino, W. (2018). The policyscape of transgender equality and gender diversity in the Western Australian education system: a case study. Gend. Educ. 30, 715–735. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2018.1483491
D’Innocenzio, A. (2023). After backlash and threats, target pulls some LGBTQ+ merchandise from store. PBS News Hour. Available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/after-backlash-and-threats-target-pulls-some-lgbtq-merchandise-from-store (Accessed June 13, 2023)
Davis, H. F. (2018). Why the “transgender” bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms. Polit. Groups Identities 6, 199–216. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2017.1338971
DeLay, D., Lynn Martin, C., Cook, R. E., and Hanish, L. D. (2018). The influence of peers during adolescence: does homophobic name calling by peers change gender identity? J. Youth Adolesc. 47, 636–649. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0749-6
Diehl, A., Vieira, D. L., Zaneti, M. M., Fanganiello, A., Sharan, P., Robles, R., et al. (2017). Social stigma, legal and public health barriers faced by the third gender phenomena in Brazil, India and Mexico: Travestis, hijras and muxes. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 63, 389–399. doi: 10.1177/0020764017706989
Eckert, P., and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender. 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Equality Hub, Government Equalities Office, and Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland. (2023). Policy statement of reasons on the decision to use section 35 powers with respect to the gender recognition reform (Scotland) bill. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/statement-of-reasons-related-to-the-use-of-section-35-of-the-scotland-act-1998/html-version (Accessed June 20, 2023)
Erickson, F. (2018). “A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research” in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. eds. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. 5th ed (California: Sage), 87–141.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). The five sexes: why male and female are not enough. Sciences 33, 20–24. doi: 10.1002/j.2326-1951.1993.tb03081.x
Foucault, M. (1988) in Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. eds. L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton (Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press).
Fyfield, M. (2022). YouTube in the secondary classroom: how teachers use instructional videos in mainstream classrooms. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 31, 185–197. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2021.1980429
Garron, K. S., and Logan, S. R. (2020). “Queering the curriculum: an exploratory study of teachers’ perceptions on integrating LGBTQ+-inclusive curriculum” in Incorporating LGBTQ+ identities in K-12 curriculum and policy. eds. A. Sanders, L. Isbell, and K. Dixon. Hershey: IGI Global.
Giordano, S., and Holm, S. (2020). Is puberty delaying treatment ‘experimental treatment’? Int. J. Transgender Health 21, 113–121. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1747768
Green, B. C. (1998). Thinking about students who do not identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, but …. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 47, 89–91. doi: 10.1080/07448489809595625
Halberstam, J. (2018). Trans*: A quick and quirky account of gender variability. Oxon: University of California Press.
Hall, S. F., and DeLaney, M. J. (2021). A trauma-informed exploration of the mental health and community support experiences of transgender and gender-expansive adults. J. Homosex. 68, 1278–1297. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1696104
Hamburger, A. (2017). “Genocidal trauma: individual and social consequences of assault on the mental and physical life of a group” in Psychoanalysis and holocaust testimony: Unwanted memories of social trauma. eds. D. Laub and A. Hamburger (London: Routledge).
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Eds. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Trans. Harper & Row Publishers.
Helmsing, M. E. (2022). “Affect” in Encyclopedia of queer studies in education. eds. K. K. Strunk and S. A. Shelton (Leiden: Brill), 8–11.
Herman, J. (2013). Gendered restrooms and minority stress: the regulation of public sexuality and its impact on trans people’s health and public lives. J. Public Manag. Soc. Policy 19, 65–80.
Higdon, J. (2023). An Act Relating to Child welfare, Senate Bill 210, Kentucky State General Assembly. Available at: https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/record/23rs/SB210.html
Hildebrand-Chupp, R. (2020). More than ‘canaries in the gender coal mine’: a transfeminist approach to research on detransition. Sociol. Rev. 68, 800–816. doi: 10.1177/0038026120934694
Holpuch, A. (2023). Behind the backlash against bud Light’s transgender influencer. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/article/bud-light-boycott.html
Hsu, V. J. (2022). Irreducible damage: the affective drift of race, gender, and disability in anti-trans rhetorics. Rhetor. Soc. Q. 52, 62–77. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2021.1990381
Jackson, H., and Kube, C. (2019). Trump’s controversial transgender military policy goes into effect. NBC News. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trump-s-controversial-transgender-military-policy-goes-effect-n993826 (Accessed June 20, 2019)
Jackson, A. Y., and Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.
Jackson, S., and Scott, S. (2001). “Putting the body’s feet on the ground: towards a sociological reconceptualization of gendered and sexual embodiment” in Constructing gendered bodies. eds. K. Backett-Milburn and L. McKie (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 9–24.
Kidd, J. D., and Witten, T. M. (2007). Transgender and transsexual identities: the next strange fruit—hate crimes, violence and genocide against the global trans-communities. J. Hate Stud. 6, 31–63. doi: 10.33972/jhs.47
Kolovos, B. (2023). Moira deeming expelled from Victorian Liberal party room after threat to sue leader John Pesutto. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/12/moira-deeming-expelled-from-victorian-liberal-party-room-after-threat-to-sue-leader-john-
Koyama, E. (2003). “The transfeminist manifesto” in Catching a wave: Reclaiming feminisim for the 21st century. eds. R. Dicker and A. Piepmeier (Boston: Northeastern University Press), 244–259.
Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., and Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. J. Sex Res. 49, 244–254. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.596954
LGB Alliance Australia (n.d.). So here’s a bit about us. Available at: https://www.lgballiance.org.au/about (Accessed June 9, 2023)
Littman, L. (2018). Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria. PLoS One 13:e0202330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202330
Loughlin, G. (2018). Gender ideology: for a ‘third sex’ without reserve. Stud. Christ. Ethics 31, 471–482. doi: 10.1177/0953946818793074
Love, A. (2014). “Transgender exclusion and inclusion in sport” in Routledge handbook of sport, gender and sexuality. eds. J. Hargreaves and E. Anderson (London: Routledge), 376–383.
MacKinnon, K. R., Ashley, F., Kia, H., Lam, J. S. H., Krakowsky, Y., and Ross, L. E. (2021). Preventing transition “regret”: an institutional ethnography of gender-affirming medical care assessment practices in Canada. Soc. Sci. Med. 291:114477. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114477
Marchiano, L. (2017). Outbreak: on transgender teens and psychic epidemics. Psychol. Perspect. 60, 345–366. doi: 10.1080/00332925.2017.1350804
Mizock, L., and Lewis, T. K. (2008). Trauma in transgender populations: risk, resilience, and clinical care. J. Emot. Abus. 8, 335–354. doi: 10.1080/10926790802262523
Nguyen, L. (2011). The ethics of trauma: re-traumatization in society’s approach to the traumatized subject. Int. J. Group Psychother. 61, 26–47. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2011.61.1.26
NHS England. (2023a). Consultation report for the interim service specification for specialist gender incongruence services for children and young people. NHS England. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Consultation-report-on-interim-service-specification-for-Specialist-Gender-Incongruence-Services-for-Children-.pdf
NHS England. (2023b). Implementing advice from the Cass review. NHS England. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/npc-crg/gender-dysphoria-clinical-programme/implementing-advice-from-the-cass-review (Accessed June 15, 2023)
Onwuachi-Willig, A. (2016). The trauma of the routine: lessons on cultural trauma from the Emmett till verdict. Soc. Theory 34, 335–357. doi: 10.1177/0735275116679864
Owen, L. (2022). “Parasitically occupying bodies”: Exploring toxifying securitization in anti-trans and genocidal ideologies. Peace Review 34, 481–494. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2022.2129000
Panter, H. (2020). “LGBT+ genocide: understanding hetero-nationalism and the politics of psychological silence” in Genocide and victimology. ed. Y. Eski (London: Routledge), 69–85.
Paternotte, D., and Kuhar, R. (2018). Disentangling and locating the “global right”: anti-gender campaigns in Europe. Politics Gov. 6, 6–19. doi: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1557
Pearce, R., Erikainen, S., and Vincent, B. (2020). TERF wars: an introduction. Sociol. Rev. 68, 677–698. doi: 10.1177/0038026120934713
Perry, B., and Dyck, D. R. (2014). “I Don’t know where it is safe”: trans women’s experiences of violence. Crit. Criminol. 22, 49–63. doi: 10.1007/s10612-013-9225-0
Picchi, A. (2023). Maybelline faces boycott over partnership with Dylan Mulvaney. CBS News. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/maybelline-dylan-mulvaney-boycott/ (Accessed June 10, 2023).
Powell, L. (2021). 2021 becomes deadliest year on record for transgender and non-binary people. Human Rights Campaign. Available at: https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/2021-becomes-deadliest-year-on-record-for-transgender-and-non-binary-people (Accessed June 9, 2023).
Priest, M. (2019). Transgender children and the right to transition: medical ethics when parents mean well but cause harm. Am. J. Bioeth. 19, 45–59. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1557276
Restar, A. J. (2020). Methodological critique of Littman’s (2018) parental-respondents accounts of “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49, 61–66. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2
Rew, L., Young, C. C., Monge, M., and Bogucka, R. (2021). Review: puberty blockers for transgender and gender diverse youth—a critical review of the literature. Child Adolesc. Mental Health 26, 3–14. doi: 10.1111/camh.12437
Richmond, K. A., Burnes, T., and Carroll, K. (2012). Lost in translation: interpreting systems of trauma for transgender clients. Traumatology 18, 45–57. doi: 10.1177/1534765610396726
Riggs, D. W., Bartholomaeus, C., and Sansfaçon, A. P. (2020). ‘If they didn’t support me, I most likely wouldn’t be here’: transgender young people and their parents negotiating medical treatment in Australia. Int. J. Transgender Health 21, 3–15. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2019.1692751
Ritz, S. A., and Greaves, L. (2022). Transcending the male-female binary in biomedical research: constellations, heterogeneity, and mechanism when considering sex and gender. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 1–11. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074083
Ryan, C. L., and Hermann-Wilmarth, J. M. (2013). Already on the shelf: queer readings of award-winning children’s literature. J. Lit. Res. 45, 142–172. doi: 10.1177/1086296x13479778
Said, E. W. (1975). The text, the world, the critic. Bull. Midwest Mod. Lang. Assoc. 8, 1–23. doi: 10.2307/1314778
Sailors, P. R. (2020). Transgender and intersex athletes and the women’s category in sport. Sport, Ethics Philos. 14, 419–431. doi: 10.1080/17511321.2020.1756904
Savage, R. (2007). “Disease incarnate”: biopolitical discourse and genocidal dehumanisation in the age of modernity. J. Hist. Sociol. 20, 404–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2007.00315.x
Scheurich, J. J. (1995). A postmodernist critique of research interviewing. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 8, 239–252. doi: 10.1080/0951839950080303
Schilt, K., and Westbrook, L. (2015). Bathroom battlegrounds and penis panics. Contexts 14, 26–31. doi: 10.1177/1536504215596943
Schreuder, M.-C. (2021). Safe spaces, agency, and resistance: a metasynthesis of LGBTQ language use. J. LGBT Youth 18, 256–272. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2019.1706685
Schultz, J. (2011). Caster Semenya and the “question of too”: sex testing in elite women’s sport and the issue of advantage. Quest 63, 228–243. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483678
Seigworth, G. J., and Gregg, M. (2010). “An inventory of shimmers” in The affect theory reader. eds. G. J. Seigworth and M. Gregg (Durham: Duke University Press), 1–25.
Seitz-Wald, A., and Yurcaba, J. (2023). Trump vows to ‘stop’ gender-affirming care for minors if re-elected president. NBC News. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-vows-stop-gender-affirming-care-minors-re-elected-president-rcna68461 (Accessed June 14, 2023).
Serano, J. (2016). Outspoken: A decade of transgender activism and trans feminism. California: Switch Hitter Press.
Serano, J. (2020). Autogynephilia: a scientific review, feminist analysis, and alternative ‘embodiment fantasies’ model. Sociol. Rev. 68, 763–778. doi: 10.1177/0038026120934690
Sheppard, M., and Mayo, J. B. (2013). The social construction of gender and sexuality: learning from two spirit traditions. Soc. Stud. 104, 259–270. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2013.788472
Shevlin, A., and Gill, P. (2020). Parental attitudes to the Australian anti-bullying safe schools program: a critical discourse analysis. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 23, 891–915. doi: 10.1007/s11218-020-09561-3
Shrier, A. (2020). Irreversible damage: the transgender craze seducing our daughters. Washington: Regnery Publishing.
Slothouber, V. (2020). (De)trans visibility: moral panic in mainstream media reports on de/retransition. Eur. J. Engl. Stud. 24, 89–99. doi: 10.1080/13825577.2020.1730052
Soh, D. (2020). The end of gender: Debunking myths about sex and identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sosa, L. (2021). Beyond gender equality? Anti-gender campaigns and the erosion of human rights and democracy. Neth. Q. Hum. Rights 39, 3–10. doi: 10.1177/0924051921996697
Spivak, G. C. (1996 [1985]). “Subaltern studies: deconstructing historiography” in The Spivak reader. eds. D. Landry and G. Maclean (London: Routledge), 203–235.
Stanley, E. A. (2021). Atmospheres of violence: Structuring antagonism and the trans/queer ungovernable. Durham: Duke University Press.
Štrkalj, G., and Pather, N. (2021). Beyond the sex binary: toward the inclusive anatomical sciences education. Anat. Sci. Educ. 14, 513–518. doi: 10.1002/ase.2002
Suh, T. M. (2022). “Gender affirming care” in Encyclopedia of queer studies in education. eds. K. K. Strunk and S. A. Shelton (Leiden: Brill), 188–195.
Sykes, H. (2006). Transsexual and transgender policies in sport. Women Sport Phys. Act. J. 15, 3–13. doi: 10.1123/wspaj.15.1.3
Szymanski, D. M., and Balsam, K. F. (2011). Insidious trauma: examining the relationship between heterosexism and lesbians’ PTSD symptoms. Traumatology 17, 4–13. doi: 10.1177/1534765609358464
Temple Newhook, J., Pyne, J., Winters, K., Feder, S., Holmes, C., Tosh, J., et al. (2018). A critical commentary on follow-up studies and “desistance” theories about transgender and gender-nonconforming children. Int. J. Transgend. 19, 212–224. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2018.1456390
Thompson, N., and Walsh, M. (2010). The existential basis of trauma. J. Soc. Work. Pract. 24, 377–389. doi: 10.1080/02650531003638163
Toomistu, T. (2022). Thinking through the s(k)in. Indonesia Malay World 50, 73–95. doi: 10.1080/13639811.2022.2015187
Trans Legislation Tracker. (2023). 2023 anti-trans bills tracker. Available at: https://translegislation.com/ (Accessed June 19, 2023)
Trans respect Versus Transphobia Worldwide (2021). Tvt tmm update • trans day of remembrance 2021. Available at: https://transrespect.org/en/tmm-update-tdor-2021/ (Accessed June 9, 2023)
Turban, J. L., Loo, S. S., Almazan, A. N., and Keuroghlian, A. S. (2021). Factors leading to “detransition” among transgender and gender diverse people in the United States: a mixed-methods analysis. LGBT Health 8, 273–280. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0437
Vasey, P. L., and Vander Laan, D. P. (2021). “Fa’afafine” in Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. eds. T. K. Shackelford and V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Cham: Springer), 2875–2876.
Venegas, M. (2022). Relationships and sex education in the age of anti-gender movements: what challenges for democracy? Sex Educ. 22, 481–495. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2021.1955669
Vicars, M., and Wolfe, J. (2023) Exploring the barriers to enhancing educational outcomes of transgender students in Australia. Special issue of Youth: LGBTIQ+ Youth: Experiences, Needs, and Aspirations.
Waites, M. (2018). Genocide and global queer politics. J. Genocide Res. 20, 44–67. doi: 10.1080/14623528.2017.1358920
Walton, G. (2005). The hidden curriculum in schools: implications for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth. Alternate Routes 21, 18–39.
Warner, M. (2000). The trouble with normal: Sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Westbrook, L., and Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gend. Soc. 28, 32–57. doi: 10.1177/0891243213503203
Widerberg, K. (1998). Translating gender. Nord. J. Fem. Gend. Res. 6, 133–138. doi: 10.1080/08038749850167833
Wilkinson, W. (2014). Cultural competency. Transgender Stud. Q. 1, 68–73. doi: 10.1215/23289252-2400181
Woodall, N. (2023). Anti-trans billboard erected in Tasmania for pride month. Q News. Available at: https://qnews.com.au/anti-trans-billboard-erected-in-tasmania-for-pride-month/ (Accessed June 9, 2023)
World Athletics. (2023). Eligibility regulations for transgender athletes. World Athletics. Available at: https://worldathletics.org/news/press-releases/council-meeting-march-2023-russia-belarus-female-eligibility
World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH]. (2018). WPATH position on “rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD)”
Zaliznyak, M., Yuan, N., Bresee, C., Freedman, A., and Garcia, M. M. (2021). How early in life do transgender adults begin to experience gender dysphoria? Why this matters for patients, providers, and for our healthcare system. Sex. Med. 9:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100448
Zanghellini, A. (2020). Philosophical problems with the gender-critical feminist argument against trans inclusion. SAGE Open 10:215824402092702. doi: 10.1177/2158244020927029
Zilber, A. (2023). ‘Burn bra challenge’ gains momentum on TikTok in calls to boycott Nike over Dylan Mulvaney ads. New York Post. Available at: https://nypost.com/2023/04/12/burn-bra-challenge-on-tiktok-over-dylan-mulvaney-nike-ads/
Keywords: (anti-)trans(gender), trauma, discourse, (psycho)social, well-being studies involving human subjects
Citation: Vicars M and Milenkovic J (2024) Interrogating global narratives of trans queerness. Well-being and agency? Or more stories of trans trauma? Front. Sociol. 9:1343117. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1343117
Edited by:
Marco Salvati, University of Verona, ItalyReviewed by:
Elena Maydell, Massey University, New ZealandTankut Atuk, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, United States
Copyright © 2024 Vicars and Milenkovic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mark Vicars, bWFyay52aWNhcnNAdnUuZWR1LmF1