Beatriz Peña-Acuña
Fernando David Rubio-Alcalá- 1Departament of Spanish, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain
- 2Departament of English, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain
This study explores the ethical implications of integrating advanced immersive technologies into education using a snowball documentary methodology, considering multidisciplinary perspectives. Advocating for a holistic approach, it suggests combining legal frameworks, ethical codes, and educational programs centered on core values. The evolving ethical landscape of immersive technologies reveals varied viewpoints among researchers, with some emphasizing concerns and others highlighting advantages. Additionally, some leverage immersive technologies for ethical education in response to emerging challenges. Post-implementation, ethical challenges and norms contribute to the ongoing expansion of the topic. A closer examination identifies nuanced differences and commonalities between immersive technologies and the Metaverse, emphasizing multifaceted considerations. Legal aspects are thoroughly covered in AR, VR, and MxR technologies, while the Metaverse focuses on identity protection. In education, immersive technologies exhibit more developed ethical concerns, underscoring the richness compared to the Metaverse.
1 Introduction
In the context of the digital revolution, the literature found indicates a growing prevalence of immersive technologies in the educational settings (Bernate and Vargas, 2020; Martín-Ramallal, 2020; Mendoza, et al., 2023). However, the integration of these technologies has not unfolded as expected by many, as it is not presented as the definitive solution (Bernate and Vargas, 2020; Bruno, et al., 2020). This phenomenon is attributed to various factors, as identify by researchers, including limited funding, educators’ reluctance, and, in some cases, a lack of familiarity or technological knowledge necessary for the effective development and application of these tools (Jamaludin et al., 2020; Costan, et al., 2021; González and Valencia, 2022).
This phenomenon reveals the intricacies associated to the integration of immersive technologies in education, emphasizing a challenge that extend beyond the mere availability of tools. One key aspect that has garnered significant attention in recent years relates to the ethical dilemmas that may arise during the utilization of immersive technologies (Costan et al., 2021) -whether augmented, virtual, mixed reality, or within the emerging paradigm of the Metaverse-, in educational contexts.
Therefore, it is necessary to examine the existing academic literature to understand how researchers are approaching this scenario and whether substantial data has been provided to address these issues. This will ensure that the incorporation of immersive technologies into education is done in an ethical and responsible manner. The incorporation of immersive technologies in educational environments poses ethical challenges, such as ensuring equal access and promoting responsible use of these technologies for instructional purposes. Partarakis and Zabulis (2024) argue that improving technological literacy through education demands concerted efforts to equip individuals of all demographics to navigate new technologies. This entails creating robust educational programs and fostering a culture of lifelong learning.
In the context of accelerated technological development, the integration of different technologies in today’s society poses ethical challenges of considerable magnitude, especially when it comes to the inclusion of technology in education, which is why it is essential to establish the ethical principles mentioned. Gómez-Trigueros and Ortega-Sánchez (2022), citing Arroyo (2016), explain that ethical knowledge is a foundation that provides moral guidelines to promote appropriate and respectful interpersonal relationships. It promotes behaviours guided by shared values that contribute to building healthy and ethical relationships in society. Ethics in the use of technology thus refers to the principles and norms that guide behaviour and decisions related to technology, encompassing an assessment of what is deemed considered morally right or wrong in the development, use and consequences of digital technologies (Hagendorff, 2020; Mohammed, et al., 2020).
While many authors cited in the literature review this understanding of ethics in the use of technology is not unanimous, Bietti (2020) argues that the use of the term ethics in relation to technology poses challenges, as the term has been used by some technology companies to disguise dubious practices. Bietti (ibid.) counters these perceptions by arguing that both the overuse of the term ethics by some companies and the exaggerated criticism by others is a misunderstanding, as he believes ethics should not simply be a cover for dubious behavior or something that can be easily dismissed. On the contrary, he argues that ethics can be a valuable tool for evaluating technology policy strategies. It should not be seen as an obstacle, but as a compass that guides ethical decisions in an increasingly technological world.
In this inquiry, the second section introduces the intersection of advanced technologies (AR, VR and MxR mainly) and education, while the third section addresses ethical themes related to the Metaverse, a fully immersive advanced technology.
2 Ethical issues related to immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MxR) and education
Partarakis and Zabulis (2024) in a systematic review on topics related to immersive technologies, they emphasize that key factors encompass the seamless integration of technologies, ethical considerations, accessibility, promotion of technological literacy through education, interoperability, user trust, environmental sustainability, and adherence to regulatory frameworks. Hence, society is tasked with addressing ethical challenges to ensure that immersive technologies are used responsibly and beneficially for the entire population. We provide an identification of ethical issues related to education in the field of immersive technologies.
In the context of responsible use of immersive technology, Christopoulos et al. (2021) have identified several new ethical issues in an intervention. These encompass various personal factors (e.g., potential threats) and classification issues (e.g., physical, psychological, moral). Chow et al. (2015) conducted a study on mobile and augmented reality usage aimed at helping students integrate these technologies and use them ethically. Tan et al. (2022) explored immersive technology’s role in social and emotional learning. Findings suggest that virtual environments enhance perspective-taking and empath in addressing ethical dilemmas compared to traditional methods. Bakhmat et al. (2022) argue that moral and moral standards play a crucial role in shaping the digital competencies of teachers. These ethical constants help maintain a balance between technological advancements and the human dimension.
Exploring access and inequality of use, this ethical analysis is not limited to the aforementioned consideration, but also extends to the related social and economic dimensions. Equality, social justice and economic sustainability are inextricably linked to ethical technological development. Partarakis and Zabulis (2024) point out that it is important to enable these technologies towards inclusion in educational environment.
Excessive use of immersive technologies can contribute to addiction and impact mental health. Society must address how to balance the benefits of these technologies with the health and well-being of individuals. In this line, ethical dilemma arises from psychological effects associated with immersion in virtual environments (Caballero Trenado, 2023; Lorente, 2023).
In this situation, the protection of privacy and data protection are key concerns that must be given great attention when designing and implementing technologies. This ensures the protection of individual rights and guarantees transparent and secure practices in the management of personal data (Jamaludin et al., 2020; Mohammed, et al., 2020; López Escarcena, 2021; Cruz Ángeles, 2023). This focus on the protection of privacy is linked to the critical examination of artificial intelligence and automated decision-making. It is argued that addressing algorithmic bias and promoting accountability are essential to ensure fairness and transparency (Nevanpera et al., 2021).
In line with these principles, ethics in the use of technology emphasizes the importance of empowering users and respecting their autonomy. To this end, it is essential to build user-machine interfaces at the design stage that not only enable informed decisions but also give people substantial control over their interaction with the technology. In addition, the integrity of technological systems and the safety of users require ethical practices, including the responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities and the proactive adoption of measures to ensure the security of systems. Southgate et al. (2019) emphasize that in the virtual reality intervention teachers-researchers where committed to students’ safety. Kremer et al. (2023) advocate for the use of virtual reality in educational training to ensure the safety of the patients preventing contagion.
Although safety and security are not usually perceived directly as ethical issues, an ethical consideration arises from the perspective of Nevanpera et al. (2021) when examined in the context of human rights. In this scenario, it is argued that an ethical discussion must take place, especially when the purpose of these measures is to protect people from social, emotional and physical challenges. In other words, when security becomes a means to protect people’s fundamental rights, ethical reflection is warranted to ensure that these protective measures are in line with broader ethical principles.
In this sense, Rosetti and Angeluci, 2021 emphasise the importance of incorporating ethical principles from the earliest stages of design. They argue that minimal governance with normative ethical regulations is essential to ensure that fundamental principles such as safety, transparency, human dignity, non-discrimination, freedom of choice, privacy protection and accountability are included in the design itself. This approach suggests that ethics should not be an afterthought, but an integral part of the design of immersive technology. Suh and Prophet (2018) propose to improve user experiences with immersive technology, systems designers should prioritize minimizing the negative effects such as motion sickness, cognitive overload, physical discomfort, and distraction.
Furthermore, it is assumed that ethics in technology also encompasses corporate responsibility. Technology companies, it is argued, should act with integrity and transparency and make a positive contribution to society, which includes ethical practises in advertising, labour relations and corporate decisions (Orozco Martinez, 2021).
Regarding misinformation, Cho et al. (2023) utilize immersive technologies escape rooms to train and equip individuals with critical resources against misinformation. During the VR intervention, Brown et al. (2023) maintained apolitical and generalized narrative examples while preserving cultural relevance as a mitigation measure. However, they caution that, firstly, the unique threat of spreading misinformation in virtual reality is real and relevant. Secondly, they recommend that the decision to test the effectiveness of misinformation in VR could easily cross the boundaries of established ethical practices. Regarding manipulation, Hein et al. (2021) propose that the portrayal of other individuals and self-presentation can be manipulated in immersive technologies. Research in behavioral psychology presents promising results in this context, particularly applicable in the field of intercultural competence.
Concerning cultural integration, Bekele and Champion (2019) express a positive perception of an intervention involving AR, VR and MxR for dissemination of cultural knowledge in Virtual Heritage. From the interaction standpoint, viable approaches were identified in collaborative and multimodal interaction methods. Hein et al. (2021) found that a substantial number of studies were noted for comparing traditional teaching methods with immersive technologies’ interventions labelled for foreign language learning. The criteria predominantly examined were cognitive learning achievements, such as vocabulary or speaking, affective variables, including motivation, satisfaction, or speaking anxiety and discomfort. Several advantages of immersive technology in foreign language teaching were employed and demonstrated in the studies identified, including heightened attention, motivation, and enjoyment. These authors have identified significant potential and a current research gap in the field of intercultural and transcultural language learning.
Below is a summary Table 1 with all the seven topics, researchers and approaches expressed in this section with a direct or indirect relationship to the educational context where it converges along with other disciplines.
Table 1. Ethical issues related to immersive technologies (AR, VR, MR) in educational context.
3 Ethical issues related to metaverse and education
In the context of digital transformation, the introduction of immersive technologies, especially with the advent of the metaverse, represents both a critical challenge and an opportunity to shape a technological environment that reflects ethical values and ensures fairness.
Based on the definitions of Cruz Ángeles, 2023, there are differences between Metaverse and metaverse (upper and lower case). This distinction is given for analysis in academic and legal fields, thus the author defines Metaverse (with the first capital letter), as the global conception of a three-dimensional and collective online digital space, that combines aspects of the physical and virtual worlds, while metaverse (with lower case) is used to describe individual digital worlds or platforms that exist within the broader framework of the Metaverse and which, although interconnected, retain their own specificities and distinguishing features, from virtual reality games to specific social networks. In this dissertation, to align the discourse coherently with the addressed theme, we will broadly focus on immersive Metaverse technology in general.
Metaverse’s role in education includes creating immersive learning environments, allowing language learning (Hwang, 2021), fostering real-time collaboration, providing interactive educational experiences, enabling remote and global training (AlSaleem, 2023), and developing advanced digital skills. This technology enhances understanding, motivation and enjoyment (Talan and Kalinkara, 2022), encourages global access, and prepares students for navigating virtual environments in the digital age. Li and Yu (2023) have discovered that blended language learning in the Metaverse entails key factors such as learner engagement, learning outcomes, and digital literacy.
Al-Adwan and Al-Debei (2023) concluded that, among higher education students (Generation Z), the following variables: performance expectation, effort, favorable conditions, hedonic motivation, value for money, personal innovation in the field of technologies were significant in predisposing to adopt Metaverse technology, except for the factor of social influence.
However, Onu et al. (2023) maintain that some learners may be hesitant to adopt Metaverse technology and may not be ready for engage at the beginning of the learning process. Talan and Kalınkara, 2022 gathered the students’ perception that Metaverse complicates learning, causes distraction, disconnects students from real-life experiences, and disrupts classroom discipline.
From an expert perspective, various authors explore several fundamental elements that are considered essential for creating an ethical and enriching Metaverse for human existence: ethical design, protections of identities, access and equity and regulation.
The concept of ethical design proves to be a fundamental principle in the construction of the Metaverse. The integration of ethical considerations in the early stages of technology development is becoming the order of the day. This means that the architecture and functions of the Metaverse are guided by sound ethical principles, mitigating risks such as algorithmic bias and promoting privacy and inclusion (Nevanpera et al., 2021; Rosetti and Angeluci, 2021; Cruz Ángeles, 2023).
The protection of personal data and the integrity of individuals in the Metaverse is becoming a priority. The protection of identities includes not only measures to prevent the theft of virtual identities, but also ensuring confidentiality in the handling of sensitive data and thus establishing ethical protocols for the management of digital identities (Jamaludin et al., 2020; Cruz Ángeles, 2023).
The principle of equity emerges as an essential component to ensure that the Metaverse is accessible and beneficial in an equitable manner. This includes removing barriers that may exclude certain groups, such as economic inequalities or limited technological access, expensiveness, time-consuming (AlSaleem, 2023), as well as race and psychomotor and cognitive deficits. Therefore, this becomes a central task. An equitable approach strives for inclusion and diversity in participation in the Metaverse, (Zallio and Clarkson, 2022; Meenaakshisundaram, 2023).
Ethical regulation is an essential element in establishing a legal framework to oversee and govern the development and operation of the Metaverse. This regulatory framework focuses on preventing abuse, protecting the rights of individuals and ensuring that practices in the Metaverse comply with previously established ethical standards (Rosetti and Angeluci, 2021; UNESCO, 2021). To compile the information, all these aspects exposed are presented in this summary Table 2.
Table 2. Ethical issues related to Metaverse and education.
4 Research methodology
The research method was a mini literature review, also known as a brief literature review or narrative review, which is a type of academic literature analysis that focuses on a concise and selective review of existing studies and publications on a particular topic. It differs from a more comprehensive systematic review in that it is more concise and focuses on specific aspects of the topic.
Within this method, the snowball documentary approach was used. This iterative approach enables the discovery of new relevant sources and ensures a more complete coverage of the topic, thus contributing to the robustness and completeness of the review. The key to the snowball technique (Hepplestone et al., 2011) is not limiting oneself to the initial sources; rather, actively seeking to build a network of references that lead to new relevant research. This approach allows for a deeper and more comprehensive exploration of the topic, combining analysis and synthesis (Sánchez-Gordón and Luján-Mora, 2018), as each newly identified source may provide additional perspective or approaches that might have been overlooked initially.
We started by searching for keywords in WOS related to the topic: ethics, educational context, and immersive technologies or synonyms. Once finding the most relevant sources identifying impactful articles peer review from the last 5 years on each immersive technology, we applied the snowball technique. We expand the search of the topic through the bibliographic references of the selected studies. We expanded the final documentary corpus using Google Scholar to find studies citing the identified peer review articles and review their references.
Thus, in line with Pellas et al. (2021) the inclusive criteria comprised peer review articles, preferably in English, published between 2018 and 2023, addressing ethical concerns related immersive technologies, and considering both abstract and full-texts. The specific criteria encompassed peer review articles providing recommendations or discussion on ethical issues regarding immersive technologies in an educational context, focusing on full-text content. Exclusion criteria involving books, book chapters, conference materials, reports, etc.,; articles lacking recommendations or discussion on the topic; and research or systematic articles with small sample size or inadequately structured research method.
Subsequently, through the critical reading of the references found, the ethical aspects of the use of immersive technologies in education expressed by the different authors in their articles, as well as the possible solutions they propose for it, are presented in a table.
5 Results
The following results have been obtained regarding ethical aspects. The results will be divided into two parts, focusing on general findings and potential ethical solutions.
5.1 Results regarding immersive technology (AR, VR and MxR) and the metaverse
If we compare the results of the dimensions uncovered through the review in both immersive technologies and the Metaverse, some are common, while others are diverse. The three common dimensions include access and inequalities, protection, privacy and data protection, and development and design. Protection, privacy, and data protection are more developed in all three technologies (AR, VR, and MxR) within the regulatory legal sphere, whereas in the Metaverse, it only addresses the protection of identities due to the use of Avatars and legally discusses regulation. In contrast, in all three immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MxR) in education, it seems that ethical issues are more developed than in the Metaverse, as responsible use of educational agents, addiction and mental health, misinformation and manipulation, and cultural integration emerge.
Among these dimensions, the aspects that have been most repetitive and that emerge as being greatest ethical challenges in Education are the following. From a socioeconomic and educational perspective, the challenge of economic inequality and technological sterns from the issue of accessibility due to the high cost of devices of all immersive technologies. This situation poses a risk that education may become exclusive, catering primarily individuals with economic resources. In this line, the concept of Digital and Social Divide underscores the potential for an increasing gap in both digital and economic aspects among different population groups, resulting in the creation of social inequalities due to the lack of universal access.
From a psychological and educational standpoint, concerns about addiction and mental health arise in immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MxR). The potential promotion of isolation through a preference for virtual environments may pose risks, leading individuals who identify more with virtual environments to experience difficulties in real-life social relationships.
Regarding the responsibility of use in educational agents, we came across a related theme: impact on human relations and pedagogical training. Concerns are raised about the quality of human relations and connections in virtual learning environments (VR), along with challenges in training and mentoring teachers to avoid bias and discrimination in the design of virtual environments.
From an educational and communicative perspective, limitations of the Metaverse as a substitute for face-to-face education have been identified. It is acknowledged that the Metaverse can be a valuable tool but cannot fully replace face-to-face education. There is a focus on the significance of personal relationships and human connection in traditional education, advocating for the human social learning aspect that requires contact, interaction, and proximity.
From a legal-regulatory and educational standpoint, the breach of ethical norms in the Metaverse poses an ethical challenge in addressing and preventing such incidents. We face another related challenge involving the lack of ethical norms in the Metaverse. The allure of the absence of norms is present, but it has an impact on empathy education. There is also concern due to the distortion of ethical awareness resulting from actions in the Metaverse that might be considered crimes in the real world.
5.2 Possible solution for ethics in immersive technologies in education
Each author offers different approaches to address ethics in the use of advanced immersive technologies and emphasises the importance of strengthening regulatory aspects such as transparency, inclusion, individual autonomy and privacy. Sanroman (2023), Caballero Trenado, 2023, Pase (2012) propose the establishment of specific laws to regulate the ethical use of immersive technologies in education.
The legal-regulatory solution should come from consolidating European digital law through the European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles by the Comisión, 2022, UNESCO (2021), and the Parlamento, 2020. Codina (2023) advocates for fostering solidarity, promoting inclusion, and safeguarding freedom of choice in the realm of digital transformation.
Regarding the Metaverse, authors such as Ortega-Rodriguez, 2022, Adams et al. (2018) suggest the development of a code of ethics for the Metaverse, addressing transparency, coexistence, inclusion, and ethics as a cornerstone, starting from the design. These authors, Kim and Park, 2022, Steele et al. (2020), advocate for re-establishing ethics as technology advances, with a focus on ethical education in the Metaverse. These scholars, Li et al. (2022), emphasize considering individual autonomy and privacy in the educational Metaverse, addressing central ethical issues. Munn and Weijers (2023), Slater et al. (2020), Rueda and Lara (2020), Carter and Egliston (2020) acknowledge that Metaverses bear moral similarities to the physical world but highlight the risks involved in developing them as commercial enterprises.
6 Discussion
6.1 Exploring ethics in immersive technology integration
A through and thoughtful exploration of critical issue of ethics in the integration of immersive technologies into education necessitates the examination of various academic, legal, socioeconomic, psychological, engineering, political and philosophical, and other perspectives that converge on the phenomenon and contribute to the understanding of this complex landscape, and the advocacy of a holistic approach that combines legal frameworks, ethical codes and educational programmes focused on core values.
We have observed that immersive technologies’ ethical approach is an expanding field in education where there is still much to be researched and standardised. We found researchers, who, as a result of investigating the intervention, raise concerns about negative ethical aspects (Suh and Prophet, 2018; Hein et al., 2021; Christopoulos et al., 2021) that should be regulated or, on the contrary, others academics emphasize only the advantages of using these technologies (Bekele and Champion, 2019; Kremer et al., 2023). Additionally, there are others researchers (Chow et al., 2015; Cho et al., 2023) leveraging immersive technologies for ethical education in response to these ethical challenges.
We have noticed that ethical challenges and ethical norms arise subsequent to the implementation of these technologies. This circumstance contributes to the ongoing expansion of this topic as educational interventions are implemented and a better understanding is gained of the benefits, drawbacks, and negative factors that need to be regulated.
A closer look at the results reveals nuanced differences and commonalities in dimensions between immersive technologies and the Metaverse. Shared dimensions, including access, inequalities, protection, privacy, data protection, and development/design, highlight multifaceted considerations. Legal aspects are thoroughly covered in AR, VR, and MxR technologies, while the Metaverse primarily focuses on identity protection through Avatars and regulatory discussions.
In education, a detailed analysis shows more developed ethical concerns in immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MxR). This is seen in the emphasis on responsible use of the educational agents, addressing addiction, mental health, misinformation, manipulation, and promoting cultural integration. This succinct exploration underscores the richness of ethical considerations within immersive technologies, particularly compared to the Metaverse.
6.2 Regulating advanced technologies
The European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles, in which the European Union took an important step towards consolidating European digital law with the adoption of this declaration on 15 December 2022 (Comisión, 2022), becomes a fundamental pillar that, while not a legal norm, reflects the EU’s commitment to a safe and human-centred digital transformation and supports fundamental values and rights. It emphasises solidarity, inclusion and freedom of choice, seeks to address ethical and societal challenges arising from digitalization and can, even if it is seen by some opponents as a political expression. Digitalization is part of digital constitutionalism and underpins the strategic agenda of the Digital Decade 2030, serving as a guide for policymakers and strengthening the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, but can also influence judicial interpretations.
By emphasising the need for connectivity, education, training and digital skills, as well as fair and equal working conditions, the Declaration positions itself as a guide for policymakers and reinforces the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, making this policy framework an important support for building an ethical and sustainable digital environment in education.
Sanroman (2023) contributes to the discussion by proposing the implementation of specific laws to ethically regulate the use of immersive technologies in education. The central idea is the need to create clear legal frameworks to guide the development and use of these technologies. Such an approach is supported in the Declaration by addressing ethical and social challenges arising from digitalization. The importance of this proposal lies in providing clear guidelines to ensure fairness, privacy and protection of rights in the use of immersive technologies in education.
In contrast, Ortega-Rodriguez, 2022 presents a practical perspective of responsible interaction, but not before pointing out the educational possibilities in the Metaverse. He focuses on the acquisition of cultural knowledge. Citing (Castells, 2005), this author explains that culture in this horizon is defined as the background and experiences of the participants, which are essential for setting norms in the knowledge society.
Both (Ortega-Rodriguez, 2022) and Martins and Wolfe (2022) argue for a Metaverse code of ethics that addresses transparency in communication, values for coexistence, inclusion, the recognition of avatars as real persons and ethics as cornerstones for the design of educational programmes and experiences, promoting a virtual environment in which the identity of users is protected and in which positive interactions and consumer confidentiality are favoured. This paper makes an important contribution to the development of crucial ethical guidelines for design and interaction in the Metaverse and provides a solid framework for future research and educational applications.
Kim and Park, 2022 research introduces a ground-breaking approach to ethics education in the Metaverse, specifically for adolescent. It specifically targets younger users with the aim of forming a solid ethical foundation from the early stages of interaction with immersive technologies. The premise of ethical restoration is taken for this approach. Their focus is on tailored education within this digital realm, emphasizing core values like metacognition, judgment, sensitivity, and moral responsibility. This innovative ethics education transcends traditional paradigms, addressing unique challenges and opportunities in the virtual environment. It prioritizes cultivating metacognitive skills, enabling critical evaluation of actions within the virtual realm. Emphasis on sound judgment is crucial for responsible participation in the Metaverse, while cultivating sensitivity enhances empathy for diverse virtual experiences. Moral responsibility, a focal point, urges adolescents to recognize the impact of their actions in the virtual community, extending the ethos beyond the digital realm to real-world consequences. Kim and Park´s work significantly contributes to a nuanced ethics education framework for adolescents in the ever-evolving Metaverse.
6.3 Philosophical perspectives
Although the dissertation by Zhang et al. (2022) did not include surveys or in-depth interviews with real users, it highlights the relevance of recognising ethics in the Metaverse through case studies, while proposing an ethical educational model for the Metaverse that encompasses competencies, objectives, content and teaching/learning methods, thus contributing to the ethical formation of users in this emerging environment.
Philosophical considerations of ethics in the Metaverse are reflected by Munn and Weijers (2023), as their philosophical perspective addresses the concerns expressed by many philosophers about the human risks associated with the development and use of metaverses. Their analysis focuses on the widely held view that metaverses, as virtual environments, have no meaning or value from a prudential perspective, as the experiences within them are seen as inherently unreal.
The central critique they advance is that the supposed unreality of metaverses is not simply limited to their virtual or intangible nature. Rather, it stems from the notion that what happens in these spaces, regardless of the experiences and opportunities they offer, is somehow diminished in value and different from actions in the physical world. From this perspective, interactions and behaviours in metaverses are perceived as inferior, placing a lower value on the lives of those who actively participate in these platforms.
The central concern of some researchers, discussed by Munn and Weijers, is the possibility that repeated exposure to these diminished virtual experiences could dehumanise users or even worsen their offline interactions. Munn and Weijers, however, disagree with this view, arguing that metaverses are actually morally similar to the physical world and that these virtual environments are capable of providing most of the experiences and interactions we have in the physical world, whether positive or negative. However, they concede that metaverses are not without risk and point out that the real ethical problem in their current incarnation lies in the risks associated with their development as commercial enterprises.
The fundamental criticism focuses on the danger that companies that control the development and maintenance of metaverses tie users to specific infrastructures. The approach they offer to user development would exert influence over users. This in itself poses a real and significant ethical risk, as these companies may have objectives and motivations that differ from the interests of metaverse users (Morandin-Ahuerma, 2023).
Consequently, Munn and Weijers propose the need to carefully consider the governance and development of metaverses, advocating for regulation that avoids the consolidation of power in the hands of corporate entities and ensures the equal participation of users in decision-making about the future of these virtual environments. Other questions remain to be investigated from a cultural and global approach: how different cultures and regions of the world approach ethics in the use of immersive technologies in education; how immersive technologies impact on learning; and how the agents involved in the learning process (teachers, students and parents) participate in the ethical framework.
7 Conclusion and recommendations for future research
This comprehensive review of ethics in the use of immersive technologies in education has highlighted the complexity and multidimensionality of this emerging topic by looking at different perspectives, from policy frameworks to specific proposals for ethical codes and the integration of values in educational programmes.
This study thoroughly examines the ethical implications of integrating immersive technologies into education, demanding a comprehensive perspective that spans academic multidisciplinary viewpoints. The recommended holistic approach, combining legal frameworks, ethical codes, and education programs centered on core values, is highlighted as essential for navigating the complex ethical landscape. As immersive technologies become integral to education, ongoing research and standardization efforts underscore the dynamic nature of the ethical dimension. Researchers’ perspectives vary, with some emphasizing concerns about negative ethical education in response to emerging challenges. Post-implementation, ethical challenges and norms arise, contributing to the continuous expansion of the topic. An in-depth analysis reveals nuanced differences and commonalities between immersive technologies and the Metaverse, emphasizing multifaceted considerations. Legal aspects receive comprehensive coverage in AR, VR, and MxR technologies, while the Metaverse focuses primarily on identity protection and regulatory discussions. Notably, in education, immersive technologies exhibit more advanced ethical concerns, particularly in the responsible use of educational agents, addressing addiction, mental health, misinformation, manipulation, and promoting cultural integration. This succinct exploration underscores the richness and depth of ethical considerations within immersive technologies, setting them apart from the Metaverse.
Therefore, a broad horizon is outlined that aims to set out the ethical challenges associated with digital immersion in education and the approach proposed by several researchers. In this line, Partarakis and Zabulis (2024) recommend that addressing these challenges requires a collaborative and forward-looking approach, along a dedication to ethical practices, inclusive design, promoting technological literacy through education, and establishing frameworks that balance innovation with responsibility.
It is imperative that legal frameworks are effectively implemented to ensure the protection of rights and equity in the use of these technologies. Furthermore, specific ethical codes need to be created for the Metaverse, adding a crucial layer of detail and guidance to ensure ethical practises in virtual interaction and providing clear guidelines for users and developers in this emerging environment.
The philosophical perspective presented by Munn and Weijers (2023) adds an additional layer to the discussion and shifts the focus to governance and power in the development of virtual platforms. This broader approach encourages reflection on how development decisions affect the user experience and emphasizes the importance of avoiding the consolidation of power in the hands of corporations.
Future research is suggested to address the limitations identified, such as the lack of detailed surveys with real users. A better understanding of user experiences and ethical concerns will provide a more solid foundation for the development of effective ethical practices and policies in the field of immersive technologies.
It also emphasizes the importance of continuing to monitor the implementation of the European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles and to assess its impact on shaping an ethical digital environment. This ongoing evaluation process will allow ethical policies and practices to be adapted and improved as the technological landscape evolves. Similarly, it would be interesting to know the impact of the implementation of the ethical framework and regulations and what the long-term implications are in terms of changes in educational dynamics.
Ultimately, ethics in the use of immersive technologies in education is a dynamic area that requires adaptability and constant reflection. Close collaboration between researchers, policymakers and education professionals will be key to ensuring an ethical and equitable virtual environment for future generations. Promoting ethics in digital immersion is not only a shared responsibility, but also a necessity to ensure a sustainable and ethical educational future.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
BP-A: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualisation, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. FA-R: Conceptualization, Project Administration, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Validation, Visualisation, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The authors declare financial support was received for the research and publication of this article. The publication of this article was funded by the Erasmus Plus research project “Digitalisation of multilingual programs in the EHEA” under reference 2021-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000022963.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adams, D., Bah, A., and Barwulor, C. (2018). Ethics emerging: the story of privacy and security. Perceptions in virtual reality. Fourteenth Symposium Usable Priv. Secur. 427–442.
Al-Adwan, A. S., and Al-Debei, M. M. (2023). The determinants of Gen Z's metaverse adoption decisions in higher education: integrating UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness in IT. Educ. Inf. Technol. 29, 7413–7445. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1
AlSaleem, B. I. A. (2023). The efficiency of metaverse platforms in language learning based on Jordanian young learners’ perceptions. Arab World Engl. J. 14 (1), 334–348. doi:10.24093/awej/vol14no1.21
Arroyo, J. (2016). Tratados y convenios internacionales que regulan los principios éticos que deben regir el actuar del auditor gubernamental. Revista Fidélitas 6, 21. doi:10.46450/revista_fidelitas.v6i1.7
Bakhmat, N., Kruty, K., Tolchieva, H., and Pushkarova, T. (2022). Modernization of future teachers' professional training: on the role of immersive technologies. Futur. Educ. 2 (1), 32–41. doi:10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.22
Bekele, M. K., and Champion, E. (2019). A comparison of immersive realities and interaction methods: cultural learning in virtual heritage. Front. Robotics AI 6, 91. doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00091
Bernate, J., and Vargas, J. (2020). Desafíos y tendencias del siglo XXI en la educación superior. Rev. Ciencias Sociales 6, 141–154.
Bietti, E. (2020). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery, 210–219.
Brown, K. M., Swoboda, S. M., Gilbert, G. E., Horvath, C., and Sullivan, N. (2023). Curricular integration of virtual reality in nursing education. J. Nurs. Educ. 62 (6), 364–373. doi:10.3928/01484834-20230110-01
Bruno, G., Capetta, C., Poniewas, L., Becker, T., Dos Santos, V., and Berri, Y. (2020). Potencialidades y debilidades de la realidad virtual inmersiva en educación. Rev. Intersaberes 15 (34), 52–71. doi:10.22169/revint.v15i34.1800
Caballero Trenado, L. (2023). En clave jurídica: enseñar en entornos virtuales inmersivos. REJIE Nueva época 28, 33–42. doi:10.24310/rejie.vi28.16139
Carter, M., and Egliston, B. (2020). Ethical implications of emerging mixed reality technologies. Socio-Tech Futur. Lab.
Castells, M. (2005). Die Internet-Galaxie. Internet, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
Cho, Y., Coward, C., Lackner, J., Windleharth, T. W., and Lee, J. H. (2023). The use of an escape room as an immersive learning environment for building resilience to misinformation. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 09610006231208027. doi:10.1177/09610006231208027
Chow, E. H., Thadani, D. R., Wong, E. Y., and Pegrum, M. (2015). Mobile technologies and augmented reality: early experiences in helping students learn about academic integrity and ethics. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Educ. 2 (7), 112–120.
Christopoulos, A., Mystakidis, S., Pellas, N., and Laakso, M. J. (2021). ARLEAN: an augmented reality learning analytics ethical framework. Computers 10 (8), 92. doi:10.3390/computers10080092
Codina, M. (2023). El metaverso en parámetros neuroeducativos. Una reflexión ética. J. Neuroeducation. 3 (2), 121–123. doi:10.1344/joned.v3i2.40776
Comisión, E. (2022). European declaration on digital rights and principles for the digital decade. J. Eur. Union. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-declaration-digital-rights-and-principles (Accessed December 12, 2023).
Costan, E., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Enriquez, L., Costan, F., Suladay, D., et al. (2021). Education 4.0 in developing economies: a systematic literature review of implementation barriers and future research agenda. Sustainability 13 (22), 12763. doi:10.3390/su132212763
Cruz Ángeles, J. (2023). Las transferencias de datos a través del Metaverso a la luz de los últimos acuerdos (UE - EE.UU.). El fenómeno “tú a Londres y yo a California”. El fenómeno “tú Lond. yo California”. Cuad. Derecho Transnacional 15 (2), 251–292. doi:10.20318/cdt.2023.8056
Gómez-Trigueros, I., and Ortega-Sanchez, D. (2022). El conocimiento ético profesional docente y su presencia en la inclusión de las tecnologías en el contexto educativo presente. EDUTEC. Rev. Electrónica Tecnol. Educ. 80, 149–163. doi:10.21556/edutec.2022.80.2345
González, G. S., and Valencia, O. (2022). Conectividad de alumnos como elemento de su ecosistema de aprendizaje durante la pandemia: estudio de caso Universidad Pedagógica Veracruzana. Rev. Innova Educ. 5 (1), 7–22. doi:10.35622/j.rie.2022.05.001
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Springer Nat. 30 (1), 99–120. doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Hein, R. M., Wienrich, C., and Latoschik, M. E. (2021). A systematic review of foreign language learning with immersive technologies (2001-2020). AIMS Electron. Electr. Eng. 5 (2), 117–145. doi:10.3934/electreng.2021007
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H., and Thorpe, L. P. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Res. Learn. Technol. 19 (2), 117–127. doi:10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10347
Hwang, Y. (2021). Invitation to metaverse: a discussion on the need of a new space for future education. J. Stud. Lang. 37 (3), 377–389.
Jamaludin, R., McKay, E., and Ledger, S. (2020). Are we ready for education 4.0 within ASEAN higher education institutions? J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 12 (5), 1161–1173. doi:10.1108/jarhe-06-2019-0144
Kim, C., and Park, J. (2022). An exploratory study on the production of Metaverse ethics education contents for adolescents. Easy Chair.
Kremer, T., Murray, N., Buckley, J., and Rowan, N. J. (2023). Use of real-time immersive digital training and educational technologies to improve patient safety during the processing of reusable medical devices: quo vadis? Sci. Total Environ. 900, 165673. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165673
Li, M., and Yu, Z. (2023). A systematic review on the metaverse-based blended English learning. Front. Psychol. 13, 1087508. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1087508
Li, Y., Wei, W., and Xu, J. (2022). “The exploration on ethical problems of educational metaverse,” in International conference on metaverse (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland), 29–38.
López Escarcena, I. (2021). Desafíos éticos en el estudio de comunidades digitales: una propuesta basada en un caso empírico. Cuad. info (49), 237–257. doi:10.7764/cdi.49.27911
Lorente, F. (2023). El rol de la ética en la comunicación híbrida del metaverso. Cuad. del Cent. Estud. Diseño Comunicación 26, 88. doi:10.18682/cdc.vi188.9274
Martín-Ramallal, P. (2020). Realidad virtual y publicidad transmedia. Un estudio multidisciplinar del advergaming inmersivo. Dr. Diss. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/29491.
Meenaakshisundaram, K. (2023). “The ethics of extended realities: insights from a systematic literature review,” in Department of informatics and media (Sweden: Uppsala University).
Mendoza, R., Falcón, A., Rushbeer, M., Estrella, G., La Chira, B., and Castro, G. (2023). La educación virtual como ciencia: tendencias en herramientas informáticas. Mar Caribe Josefrank Pernalete Lugo.
Mohammed, A., Deepak, K., Taher, M., and Beenu, M. (2020). Information technology ethics and professional responsibilities. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 29 (4), 11336–11343.
Morandin-Ahuerma, F. (2023). Principios normativos para una ética de La inteligencia artificial. Available at: https://philarchive.org/archive/MORVPD-2 (Accessed December 12, 2023).
Munn, N., and Weijers, D. (2023). The real ethical problem with metaverses. Front. Hum. Dyn. 5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fhumd.2023.1226848
Nevanperä, M., Rajamäki, J., and Helin, J. (2021). Design science research and designing ethical guidelines for the SHAPES AI developers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 2330–2339. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.223
Onu, P., Pradhan, A., and Mbohwa, C. (2023). Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 29, 8893–8924. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
Orozco Martinez, I. (2021). De la ética empresarial a la sostenibilidad, ¿por qué debe interesar a las empresas? Anáhuac J. 20 (1), 76–105. doi:10.36105/theanahuacjour.2020v20n1.03
Ortega-Rodriguez, P. (2022). De la Realidad Extendida al Metaverso: una reflexión crítica sobre las aportaciones a la educación. Rev. Interuniv. 34 (2), 189–208. doi:10.14201/teri.27864
Parlamento, E. (2020). “Recomendaciones destinadas a la Comisión sobre un marco de los aspectos éticos de la inteligencia artificial,” in la robótica y las tecnologías conexas (2020/2012). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_ES.html (Accessed December 12, 2023).
Partarakis, N., and Zabulis, X. (2024). A review of immersive technologies, knowledge representation, and AI for human-centered digital experiences. Electronics 13 (2), 269. doi:10.3390/electronics13020269
Pase, S. (2012). “Ethical considerations in augmented reality applications,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE), 1.
Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., and Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality in K-12 and Higher Education: a systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Real. 25 (3), 835–861. doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9
Rosetti, R., and Angeluci, A. (2021). Ética algorítmica: questões e desafios éticos do avanço tecnológico da sociedade da informação. Galáxia 46, 1–18. doi:10.1590/1982-2553202150301
Rueda, J., and Lara, F. (2020). Virtual reality and empathy enhancement: ethical aspects. Front. Robotics AI 7, 506984. doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.506984
Sanchez-Gordon, S., and Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: a systematic literature review 2008–2016. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 17 (4), 775–789. doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0531-2
Sanroman, R. (2023). Los actos jurídicos en el mundo Metaverso. Quaestio Iuris 16 (1), 58–74. doi:10.12957/rqi.2023.68459
Slater, M., Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Haggard, P., Vinkers, C., Gregory-Clarke, R., Jelley, S., et al. (2020). The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 1. doi:10.3389/frvir.2020.00001
Southgate, E., Smith, S. P., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Kilham, J., Eather, G., et al. (2019). Embedding immersive virtual reality in classrooms: ethical, organisational and educational lessons in bridging research and practice. Int. J. Child-Computer Interact. 19, 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.002
Steele, P., Burleigh, C., and Young, E. (2020). Considering educators' perceptions of ethics and safety in virtual learning environments (VLEs). J. Educ. Res. Pract. 10 (1), 404–418. doi:10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.26
Suh, A., and Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: a literature analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 86, 77–90. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019
Talan, T., and Kalınkara, Y. (2022). Students' opinions about the educational use of the metaverse. Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci. (IJTES) 6 (2), 333–346. doi:10.46328/ijtes.385
Tan, M. C. C., Chye, S. Y. L., and Teng, K. S. M. (2022). “In the shoes of another”: immersive technology for social and emotional learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27 (6), 8165–8188. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10938-4
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.
Zallio, M., and Clarkson, P. J. (2022). Designing the Metaverse: a study on inclusion, diversity, equity, accessibility and safety for digital immersive environments. Telematics Inf. 75, 101909. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101909
Keywords: advanced technology, Humanism, human rights, ethics of technology, Responsibility
Citation: Peña-Acuña B and Rubio-Alcalá FD (2024) Ethical approach to the use of immersive technologies. Advance about digitalisation of multilingual programs in the EHEA. Front. Virtual Real. 5:1357595. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2024.1357595
Received: 18 December 2023; Accepted: 20 June 2024;
Published: 11 July 2024.
Edited by:
Leonora Onarheim Bergsjø, Østfold University College, NorwayReviewed by:
Asterios Leonidis, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), GreeceAna María Aguilar, University of Burgos, Spain
Copyright © 2024 Peña-Acuña and Rubio-Alcalá. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fernando David Rubio-Alcalá, ZmVybmFuZG8ucnViaW9AZGZpbmcudWh1LmVz