Corrigendum: Online photovoice to engage indigenous Cook Islands youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing amidst a global disruption
- 1Faculty of Culture and Society, Department of Hospitality and Tourism, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
- 2Vice Chancellor's Office, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
- 3Independent Researcher, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
- 4Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia
Photovoice is a participatory action research method that aims to include the voices of groups by enabling people to record and reflect on their knowledge of issues they consider important. Drawing from critical pedagogy, feminist theory, and community-based approaches to document research, photovoice involves participants as collaborators by using photographs that participants take themselves. Engaging the participants in conversations regarding their photographs facilitates agency in the research process and provides valuable insights into the views, experiences, and knowledge of participants. Originating in the public sector as a method for assessing health needs, the use of photovoice has since gained popularity as a tool for examining perceptions regarding changes in the social and natural environment, and for exploring human-environment interactions. This paper reviews the use of photovoice as a research method to engage indigenous youth in the small island community of Rarotonga, Cook Islands for the exploration of ecological and social wellbeing during disaster times. Amidst the global disruption ensued by the COVID-19 pandemic, indigenous youth participants explored the responses and adaptations of their community to changes in the social and ecological environment of their island home. Given the associated lockdown measures and travel restrictions, photovoice interviews were conducted via Zoom, an online videoconferencing platform. By integrating the photovoice method with advanced online communication systems, the research team based in Auckland, New Zealand was able to collect data remotely while facilitating meaningful engagement with indigenous youth participants across geographic and cultural borders. The use of online photovoice via Zoom was shown to be an empowering and inclusive method for the engagement of indigenous youth and the promotion of collaborative, cross-cultural research partnerships for the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during a global disruption.
1. Foreign representations of indigenous peoples and places
Indigenous people are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “populations or communities that live within, or are attached to, geographically distinct traditional habitats or ancestral territories, and who define themselves as being part of a distinct cultural group, descended from group present in the area before modern states were created and current borders defined. They generally maintain cultural and social identities, and social, economic, cultural, and political institutions, separate from the mainstream or dominant society or culture” (World Health Organization, 2007). Since the late 18th century, indigenous peoples in Pacific Island Countries (PICs) have been challenged through various encounters with early explorers, missionaries, traders, and other more recent agents of colonialism, development, and capitalism (Jolly, 2007). Foreign knowledge of the Pacific has been used to create imaginaries of vulnerability in terms of what they lack; not only the absence of development, civilization, or growth, but also in the perceived deficiencies of scale, isolation, and dependency (Kothari and Arnall, 2017). For example, in a study that explored how the rise of neoliberal growth strategies in the 1980s and 1990s impacted various Pacific Islands societies, Hooper (1993) observed that traditional systems of rights to land and kinship networks were judged as irrational commitments to family which limited the potential for useful development. A similar study points out that the export-growth strategies and neoliberal development discourses portray subsistence economies as “primitive,” “backwards,” and “stagnant,” and should therefore be replaced with modern techniques for the sake of economic growth (Fry, 2019). Gegeo (2001) further noted that cultural events, which depend on traditional agricultural practices, were regarded as wasteful exchanges of valuables resources.
While some scholars consider that the Eurocentric lens, which perceives peoples and places in terms of their economic development potential, enabled the growth and success of small island economies in the Pacific (Croes et al., 2020), others claim that it also led to a series of unforeseen consequences and negative impacts to the social and ecological wellbeing of Pacific Islands people (Diedrich and Aswani, 2016). For instance, studies demonstrate how neoliberal growth strategies contributed to the erosion of robust social networks that enabled the exchange of foods and agroecological knowledge (Newsom and Wing, 2004; Temudo and Abrantes, 2013). In terms of the adverse impacts of tourism as an economic development strategy in PICs, research reveals how the growth of international tourism sectors resulted in environmental change, commodification of nature and culture, food insecurities, and conflict with local people possessing different values, interests and priorities (Kothari and Arnall, 2017). Studies further demonstrate how neoliberal development strategies led to biodiversity loss (Campbell, 2014) and the deterioration of soil health and land productivity (Gould et al., 2015), which further led to an increasing dependence on non-nutritious imported food (Marrero and Mattei, 2022). Evidently, PICs were encouraged by colonial administrators and Christian missionaries to transform their subsistence-based communities to monetized societies in order to participate in a globalized economy and stimulate economic growth and development (Connell, 2010).
The influence of foreign policies in PICs, however, is not limited to development literature. Environmentalists and conservationists appropriated the island imagery of primitive societies in need of modernization and economic development by adding a new layer of perceived environmental vulnerabilities to meet their sustainable development agenda (Scheyvens and Momsen, 2008). Indeed, there is a great wealth of research that recognizes the role of physical characteristics and climatic processes in determining the vulnerability of Pacific Islands societies to exogenous disruptions (Veron et al., 2019; Filho, 2020; De Scally and Doberstein, 2022). In the Pacific region, some of the large-scale impacts of climate change include increased variability in rainfall events (McGree et al., 2014), stronger and more frequent tropical cyclones (McMichael et al., 2019), rising sea-level (Kulp and Strauss, 2019), increase in air and sea surface temperatures (De Scally and Doberstein, 2022), and changes in regional climatic systems, particularly the South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ) and El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (Cai and Marks, 2021). Climate scientists, sociologists, economists, marine biologists, agronomists, ecologists and political scientists have all recognized that these large-scale changes are expected to have significant implications for nearly every sector in PICs, including tourism, fisheries, agriculture, human settlements, freshwater resources, and health (De Scally and Doberstein, 2022).
However, by over-emphasizing the physical features of small islands, the concept of vulnerability is merely understood as the result of an island's exposure to hazards. Consequentially, limited attention is given to the social and cultural characteristics of Pacific Islands people in determining their resilience and adaptive capacity to external disruptions (Rivas, 2019). Scholars argue that focusing on the physical source of a disruption leads to the implementation of externally designed technocratic solutions, which are removed from the everyday lives, needs and concerns of island people (Nunn et al., 2020). Furthermore, many of these environmental conservation, sustainable development, and climate change policies have been proposed and implemented from a predominantly scientific worldview, in which climate change is seen as a science-informed issue, rather than a faith-based challenge (Luetz and Nunn, 2020). Considering the overwhelming prominence of Christianity in PICs, it has been argued that such secular interventions fail to acknowledge the powerful influence of spirituality (Nunn et al., 2016; Scott-Parker et al., 2017; Weir et al., 2017). Nevertheless, as a result of the dominant foreign representation of Pacific Islands societies as socially, economically and environmental vulnerable, today PICs are regarded as the most vulnerable societies to exogenous threats and disruptions (Uitto and Shaw, 2016).
1.1. The risk of perpetuating foreign victimhood narratives of indigenous peoples
Scholars argue that the continuous emphasis on the agency of environmental and socio-economic threats found within disaster studies in the context PICs, rather than a focus on the human agency of Pacific islands people, works to re-enforce the victimhood narrative by representing islanders as passive in the face of disruptive change (Biggs et al., 2011; DeLoughrey, 2019). On a similar note, literature on social-ecological change in indigenous and marginalized communities demonstrate that indigenous peoples and their knowledge are often excluded from debates and decision-making processes that concern the social and ecological wellbeing of their communities (Agrawal and Chhatre, 2006; Adger et al., 2011; Biggs et al., 2011). From this position, scholars argue that externally born representations of PICs have limited explanatory power because they arise from a western understanding of success and wellbeing, which often does not neatly translate to local cultural constructs of wellbeing (Scheyvens et al., 2020). Furthermore, these ahistorical and reductionist framings of PICs as inherently vulnerable to exogenous change fail to represent how island societies make meaningful lives for themselves through their own perceptions of social and ecological wellbeing (Barnett and Waters, 2016). As the concept of wellbeing becomes a deeper focus of social-ecological systems research, conservation, socio-economic development, ecosystems-based management, and disaster studies (Summers et al., 2012; Milner-Gulland et al., 2014; Breslow et al., 2016; DeLoughrey, 2019; Scheyvens et al., 2020), the need for in-depth qualitative studies that enable a deeper understanding of indigenous framings of wellbeing are becoming increasingly vital (Daw et al., 2011; Cruz-Garcia et al., 2017; Masterson et al., 2018). Furthermore, as noted by influential Tongan anthropologist, Epeli Hau'ofa, it is imperative to consider different representations of Pacific Islands societies not just because of their geopolitical and discursive hegemony but because island people have, in part, come to see themselves through the lens of outsiders (Hau'ofa, 1994).
In addition to the socio-economic and environmental impacts of colonial interventions and the promulgation of neoliberal development policies, studies demonstrate how colonization and Christianisation negatively impacted the traditional ways of learning and education systems of Pacific Islands people (Taufe'ulungaki, 2004; Thaman, 2008; Johansson-Fua, 2016; Taumoefolau, 2019). For instance, Thomas (1993) points out that mission activities are responsible not only for the expansion of Christianity in the region, but also for the introduction of formal schooling and the forced application of the English language. The fear of losing one's language is a common theme across the Pacific region (Maia et al., 2018; Glasgow, 2019). According to McCaffery and McFall-McCaffery (2010), the maintenance of language is critical for Pacific communities, especially for those whose languages have been classified as endangered, such as Cook Islands Māori and its dialects which have been replaced with the increasing use of the English language. Furthermore, language has been recognized as one of the most important practices through which cultural production takes place (Corson, 1998; Pacini-Ketchabaw and Armstrong de Almeida, 2006; Grace and Ku'ulei Serna, 2013). From this position, both indigenous and non-indigenous scholars argue that the introduction of literacy and the forced application of English transformed the oral traditions of Pacific Islands societies, thereby marking one of the most significant cultural and social changes in the region to date (Smith Tuhiwai, 1999; Hau'ofa, 2008; Thaman, 2008; Vaka'uta, 2011; Lange, 2017). In addition to the practice of language, the provision of education has been regarded as having an important role to play in the preservation of local customs and traditions and in the development of a national identity (Kennedy, 2019).
In observing the impacts of loss of language and the ways of learning across the Pacific, the Tangata Whenua (Indigenous people of Ateaora New Zealand) developed a programme commonly known as the “the language nest,” which aims to revitalize the Māori language in early-childhood education (Benton, 1989; Chambers and Saddleman, 2020). The language nest programme, which originated in the 1980s, was then accelerated by women in the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, Tonga and Samoa who recognized the consequences of the loss of their language and culture, and thus took action to ensure that not only their languages would be passed on to their children, but also key social-cultural values that promote indigenous ways of learning (Glasgow, 2019). Despite the efforts of Pacific communities, and Pacific women in particular, the languages of the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelua continue to decline rapidly. In 2013, these languages were declared inter-generationally extinct in Aotearoa New Zealand, where the majority of the respective populations reside (McFall-McCaffery and Cook, 2016).
Today, indigenous youth across various Pacific Islands societies are constantly reminded of their colonial past in the classroom, on social media, on television, through persisting stereotypes, and through the continued pressures of modernization and globalization (Armstrong et al., 2021). For example, history classes in the Cook Islands continue to be taught through the perspective of European domination, thereby perpetuating the long-standing patterns of power that emerged during the colonial administration (Glasgow, 2019). This in turn influences the self- image and aspirations of indigenous peoples through a process known as the sociality of coloniality (Maldonado-Torres, 2013). In recognizing the impacts of coloniality on indigenous youth in Rarotonga, Cook Islands, a local non-governmental organization by the name of Korero o te‘Orau seeks to improve the wellbeing of its indigenous peoples and their environment through the revitalisation of traditional knowledge and holistic education for indigenous youth (Cook Islands Government, 2020).
Since 2017, Korero o te‘Orau's youth development programs tui'anga ki te Tango1 have offered local youth opportunities to reconnect with their culture while learning about environmental science. This study collaborated with Korero o te‘Orau to engage indigenous youth participants in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during the global disruption of COVID-19. The objective is to foster a deeper and holistic understanding of complex human-nature relationships in indigenous Pacific societies, and how these interactions translate into vulnerabilities or opportunities that can enhance the resilience of PICs to exogenous disruptions. Given the international travel restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to the social hierarchies found across various Polynesian societies which perpetuate the exclusion of marginalized groups such as the youth, this study developed an innovative and culturally responsive method to engage indigenous youth and collect qualitative data remotely by modifying the photovoice technique for online usage.
The paper begins by critically discussing indigenous Pacific understanding of wellbeing to demonstrate the lack of representation of indigenous youth perspectives within this body of literature. The article then provides an explanation as to why indigenous youth are typically excluded from research due to social and cultural values entrenched in traditional Pacific societies. It then builds on and contributes to the burgeoning literature on photovoice as a youth-friendly, empowering participatory research tool that emphasizes social inclusion and social justice by including the voices and perspectives of marginalized groups in decision-making. This is followed by a discussion on the adaptation of photovoice for online use to conduct remote qualitative data collection amidst the global disruption of COVID-19. The methods section includes a descriptive account of the research setting, the development of local research partnerships, the recruitment process, and data collection. A brief summary of the results is threaded through the photovoice stages of photograph production and discussion, highlighting the trade-offs, challenges and potentials of online photovoice. The article concludes by evaluating the potential of photovoice as an online participatory visual method for the engagement of indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during disaster times.
1.2. Indigenous Pacific understanding of wellbeing
Over the last two decades, a growing number of indigenous Pacific scholars have challenged Oceanic researchers to consider how western educational legacies, their philosophies, ideologies, and pedagogies have neglected the way Pacific peoples communicate, think, and learn for over 200 years (Smith Tuhiwai, 1999; Thaman, 2003; Taufe'ulungaki, 2004; Hau'ofa, 2008; Le Fanu, 2013; Johansson-Fua, 2016; Toumu'a et al., 2016; Taumoefolau, 2019). Within this body of knowledge, commonly referred to as “decolonization of Pacific studies and mind,” indigenous scholars critically reflect on the processes whereby colonial ideologies sought to replace the values and belief systems that underpin the indigenous ways of knowing, their views of who they are, and mainly, what they consider important to teach and learn (Thaman, 2003). By drawing from studies that explore notions of wellbeing through the lens of indigenous Pacific Islands people, this section aims to develop a deeper understanding of the multifaceted and relational concept of wellbeing.
In contrast to the European philosophy where the self is positioned in opposition to the other, and where private ownership is prioritized over communal living, Pacific islanders are deeply relational people, where their identity and being are defined from the collective (Thaman, 2008). This multidimensional understanding of wellbeing in Pacific Islands societies is centered on notions of reciprocity that refer to individuals, communities, the environment and the relationships that binds them together (Taufe'ulungaki, 2004; Te Ava and Page, 2020; Tu'itahi et al., 2021). For example, one of the most common words used in many Pacific cultures is the word fonua in Tongan, or vanua in Fijian, which refers to both the land and the people (Taumoefolau, 2019). This understanding of wellbeing from a communal point of view focuses on social responsibilities and upholding duties of care to the community and the land (Fletcher et al., 2021). From this point of view, land is understood to play an important cultural and spiritual role for many Pacific Islands societies.
Both indigenous and non-indigenous Pacific scholars have recognized the importance of land because it is indicative of prestige, wealth, heritage, security, food, and identity; it represents people's birthplaces and places of origin (Crocombe, 1973; Bonnemaison, 1985; Tabe, 2011; Campbell, 2014). To Pacific islanders, their “small remote islands” which are commonly perceived as vulnerable to exogenous shocks through the lens of foreign scholars, are considered to be complex heritage sites that are comprised of ancestorial resources and cultural knowledge, and represent a continuity with the past (Steiner, 2015). Hence, for Pacific Islands societies, and many marginalized indigenous peoples around the world, the act of being displaced from their physical environment is inherently linked to the sense of loss of traditional knowledge and practices, language, culture, and ultimately, identity (Klepp and Herbeck, 2016).
In addition to emphasizing the relationship between land and people, Pacific models of wellbeing are comprised of multiple individual elements from many small island nations, including Samoa, Tonga, the Cook Islands, and Niue (Pulotu-Endemann and Tu'itahi, 2009). For instance, the fonofale model of health (Figure 1) represents five key dimensions of wellbeing. The roof represents one's culture, beliefs and value systems which provides protection and shelter. The floor represents the family, including relatives and extended family members. The roof and foundation are then supported by four pillars, which represent the spiritual, mental, and other aspects of wellbeing such as sexuality, socio-economic status, and gender (Pulotu-Endemann, 2001). Finally, the fale (house) is surrounded by a cocoon or boundary that situates the five dimensions of wellbeing within its own physical environment, time and context (Pulotu-Endemann, 2001). In this way, the fonofale model demonstrates the importance and influence of external factors in shaping the multifaceted concept of wellbeing. More importantly, by acknowledging that wellbeing exists within a physical, social and temporal context, the fonofale model recognizes that wellbeing is both dynamic and subjective.
Figure 1. The Fonofale model of health (Pulotu-Endemann, 2001).
In the Cook Islands, the five notions of wellbeing have been described by Pacific scholars as the following: kopapa—physical wellbeing; tu manako—mental and emotional wellbeing; vaerua—spiritual wellbeing; kopu tangata—social wellbeing; aorangi—total environment, that is, how society influences you and the way individuals are shaped by their environment (Aldinger and Whitman, 2009; Futter-Puati and Maua-Hodges, 2019). To help elucidate how the five dimensions of wellbeing are interconnected, indigenous Cook Islander researchers have applied the tivaevae model (Figure 2). The tivaevae is a large handmade quilt decorated with an array of different cloths, colors, and designs that represent the Cook Islands environment—flowers, leaves, emblems, landscapes, ocean and sky (Te Ava and Page, 2020). The crafting of the tivaevae is a collaborative effort between a group of people, typically women, who aim to create a picture that tells a story. This picture often represents a traditional family-held pattern (Maua-Hodges, 2000).
Figure 2. The five Cook Islands values in Maua-Hodges' tivaevae model (Hunter et al., 2018).
According to Rongokea (2001), the tivaevae patterns illustrate the social, cultural, historical, spiritual and religious, economic and political representations of the Cook Islands' culture. The making of the tivaevae also represents the teaching and learning of Cook Islanders' papa'anga (genealogy) and te mārama (the knowledge) which have been passed down from generation to generation (Te Ava and Page, 2020).
Evidently, there is a large body of knowledge within the existing literature on indigenous Pacific framings of wellbeing which helps to elucidate the inter-relationships and multifaceted understandings of wellbeing in PICs. However, there are limited studies that explore how indigenous youth in the Pacific perceive the social and ecological wellbeing of their small island community (Armstrong et al., 2021). Furthermore, no literature was found to date that investigates how indigenous Pacific youth perceive social and ecological change in their community during a global disruption.
1.3. Social hierarchies and indigenous youth in traditional Pacific societies
The term “youth” as defined by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is as a group of people aged between 15 to 24 years old (United Nations Children's Foundation, 2017). In the context of Polynesian societies, however, scholars suggest that indigenous youth groups can extend up to 34 years old (Larmour, 2009; Poppelwell and Overton, 2022). Regardless of the numerical difference in age, studies that explore the concept of wellbeing from an indigenous lens have found that the perspectives and voices of indigenous youth are often underrepresented in both quantitative survey methods, such as questionnaires, and qualitative research, such as in-depth interviews (Jennings and Lowe, 2013; Paris and Winn, 2013). For example, Paris and Winn (2013) demonstrate that indigenous youth in Canada under the age of 18 are often excluded from traditional health survey methods. Pawlowski et al. (2022) suggest that while culture and language are considered critical components of wellbeing for elders in indigenous communities, little is known about how these determinants compare to the world of video games, social media and memes, which uniquely characterize the life of young people. On a similar note, Ramey et al. (2019) argue that the images and words indigenous youth use to communicate and understand health and wellbeing are rarely explored and documented. Hence, while there appears to be a growing understanding of how indigenous populations perceive wellbeing as a deeply relational and multifaceted concept, the perspective of indigenous youth is largely absent from these local traditional representations. From this position, scholars argue that in order to obtain a holistic picture of the various dimensions of wellbeing in indigenous communities, there needs to be more research that explores wellbeing from the lens of indigenous youth (Jennings and Lowe, 2013; Paris and Winn, 2013; Ramey et al., 2019; Wexler et al., 2019; Pawlowski et al., 2022).
In the context of small island communities in the Pacific, indigenous scholars indicate that the lack of representation from youth participants in research can be linked to cultural barriers and traditional social hierarchies which impede indigenous youth from engaging in meaningful roles, such as decision-making processes for issues they consider important (Taumoefolau, 2019; Siisiialafia-Mau, 2021). Contrary to the popular discourse found within western framings of PICs, in which Pacific Islands societies are represented as homogenous and “romantically traditional” (Cote and Nightingale, 2012), PICs tend to be highly stratified due to traditional social hierarchies (Fotu et al., 2011). To help elucidate the social stratification found within traditional small island societies in the Pacific, scholars have referred to the notion of relationality. Relationality demonstrates the positionality of social relationships which dictates these hierarchal societies (Larmour, 2009; Taumoefolau, 2019). For instance, positionality is based on relationships, so one's positionality is determined by the relationship to others; that is, by how one is viewed by others, not by a code of rights or a process of privatization (Taumoefolau, 2019). The hierarchal relationships within traditional Polynesian societies, such as Tonga, the Cook Islands, and Samoa, place relationships between different social groups and the obligations and responsibilities that follow from these at the center of their socially stratified society (James, 2003). From this point of view, academics argue that traditional social hierarchies in various Polynesian societies dictate the boundaries of social experiences by determining a person's status. And it is these social hierarches that often perpetuate the exclusion of marginalized groups, including indigenous youth (Good, 2012; Lee, 2019).
According to a recent study that explores the lived experiences of indigenous youth in Tonga, Taumoefolau (2019) found that the expressed desire to live in an egalitarian society, where everyone's voice is heard and included in decision making matters, stems from the youths' subjective experiences of living in a highly stratified traditional society. In the Cook Islands, studies found that social hierarchies and nepotistic relationships are contributing to the increasing rates of youth of unemployment, which in turn further stimulates outward migration to New Zealand as indigenous youth hope to escape the social constraints of their small island communities (Dickson et al., 2018). This is particularly the case for indigenous youth in the outer islands that have no rights to land and/or that are born in families that are not well connected (Tiraa, 2006; Pascht, 2011; Marsters, 2016). However, due to the importance of cultural values across PICs, social issues linked to nepotism or exclusionary social hierarchies are challenging to confront (Larmour, 2009). For example, in the Cook Islands, Samoa and Tonga, a predisposition to obey superiors and elders is inherent in both cultures, which was observed in the reluctance of youth to criticize elders (Larmour, 2009; Poppelwell and Overton, 2022).
In summary, cultural values such as reciprocity and family ties appear to present a paradox for the wellbeing of indigenous communities in PICs. On the one hand, social networks and kinship ties are essential for the wellbeing of Pacific Islands people. On the other hand, the obligation to help one's kin and respect traditional values is so deep that these cultural norms are tolerated, even when they perpetuate the exclusion of marginalized groups (Crocombe, 1973; Wickberg, 2013). However, as the president of the Pacific Youth Council in Samoa reminds foreign and indigenous scholars, while there are many studies that discuss the adverse impacts of cultural barriers for the inclusion of youth in meaningful engagement in traditional Pacific societies, youth are still valued and considered important in Pacific Islands communities (Siisiialafia-Mau, 2021). From this standpoint, Siisiialafia-Mau (2021) argues that rather than trying to change certain socio-cultural aspects, indigenous youth need to develop and build their own cultural competency to best navigate around cultural barriers, thereby still respecting their cultural identity while enhancing their agency to increase their empowerment. From this position, the research presented in this article addresses the gap within the existing literature by including the voices of indigenous youth and applying a culturally appropriate technique that respects the traditional values of Pacific Islands societies.
2. The method: photovoice
Originally developed to engage Chinese women in health research (Wang and Burris, 1997), photovoice is a participatory research method that is based on the fairly simple principle of using one or more images (or any other type of visual representation, including videos and paintings) during an interview and asking the participants to discuss the images (Catalani and Minkler, 2010). According to Abma et al. (2022), photovoice is considered a youth-friendly method because it is less verbally focused than other qualitative research methods. It offers youth participants an opportunity to take photographs of what they perceive to be important issues, which are then used as a prompt to further a dialogue and articulate their stories (Cook and Hess, 2007). The photographs taken and selected by youth participants represent their interests and enhances their potential to express their opinions on matters they consider important (Sarti et al., 2018) rather than on issues selected by their guardians, elders, or the lead investigator of the respective study. In this light, photovoice can be considered an empowering research method because instead of being the subject of the study, youth participants are in control of the research by holding the camera, taking the photographs, deciding what is captured and seen (and not captured and unseen), and what topics are worth discussing in further detail (Bottrell et al., 2014).
In addition to providing a youth-friendly research method, photovoice has been increasingly recognized as a research technique that emphasizes social inclusion and social justice, and aims to honor participants' rights to express their voices and include their perspectives in decision-making processes (Wang and Burris, 1997; Clark, 2010; Sarti et al., 2018; Abma et al., 2022). For instance, Freire, 1970 demonstrates how photovoice allows participants with limited resources (i.e., money, power, or social status) to document and share their lived experiences, and voice what changes are necessary to improve health and wellbeing in their community as they see them. In feminist theory, which claims that power is conferred to those who have a voice, decide language, influence history, and partake in decision-making (Smith Tuhiwai, 1999; Mitchell et al., 2020), Wang and Redwood-Jones (2001) found that photovoice seeks to explore feminist theoretical perspectives by bringing seldom-heard ideas, voices, and images into the public forum. From this position, feminist theory informs photovoice by enabling participants to take photographs and connect their narratives to these images in ways that best reflects their experiences and increases their voices to drive change, influence decisions, and generate awareness on issues they perceive to be important to their health and wellbeing (Wang and Pies, 2004). With regards to community-based approaches to document research, scholars have applied photovoice as a community-based participatory research (CBPR) tool to demonstrate its effectiveness for the co-production of knowledge by encouraging participants to take photos that illustrate key issues relevant to their lives, and empowering people to articulate stories through photography or other visual media (Castleden and Garvin, 2008; Vansteenkiste et al., 2021).
However, research on visual social and ecological change revealed an increasing tendency toward the decontextualization of images, which obscured the desires and concerns as to what is important to visualize from the perspective of different actors (Spiegel et al., 2020). From this point of view, Coats (2014) argues that photography can be a weapon that stigmatizes or victimizes, as well as a tool that empowers. Scholars refer to the former as “crises of representation” (Harper, 2012), in which visuals can replicate colonialist traditions whereby photos from the colonies were brought back to the imperialist homes to spread a certain desired representation of foreign lands and peoples for exploitation (Mitchell et al., 2020). Seeking to reverse these imperial traditions, critical feminist theory informs photovoice in order to situate visual representations within anti-colonial epistemologies and counteract the power relations between researchers and participants (De Leeuw and Hawkins, 2017). For example, Bennett and Dearden (2013) applied photovoice in an innovative way to explore how indigenous communities in Thailand respond to and interact with ecosystem dynamics in order to deepen the understanding of how a community's perception of change can influence their adaptive capacity to changes. They found that while photovoice was a powerful method for examining social and environmental change, a more holistic picture could have been formed by combining photovoice with other methods to explore traditional ways of addressing unwanted changes.
Other studies used photovoice to help elucidate traditional ecological knowledge about conservation and human-wildlife conflict option (Beh et al., 2013), in addition to exploring ecosystem services with indigenous communities to elicit local knowledge about land management actions (Kong et al., 2015), environmental change (Baldwin and Chandler, 2010), and sense of place (Briggs et al., 2014). Finally, an emerging area of focus is the use photovoice in disaster studies, particularly within the field of disaster management and climate change (Russo et al., 2021). For example, two recent studies have applied photovoice to engage the voices of rural and indigenous community members recovering from natural disasters in Ontario, Canada (Russo et al., 2021), and to investigate the role of social capital in disaster settings to support community resilience in the Philippines (Cai, 2017).
Notwithstanding the growing body of literature that applies photovoice to explore social and ecological changes from the perspective of indigenous communities (Baldwin and Chandler, 2010; Berbés-Blázquez, 2012; Beh et al., 2013; Bennett and Dearden, 2013; Briggs et al., 2014; Kong et al., 2015; Masterson et al., 2018), there is scant research exploring how indigenous youth perceive the wellbeing of their social and ecological environment in the context of a global disruption. In one study that investigates indigenous youths' perspectives on water and health in First Nations communities in Canada, Bradford et al. (2017) found that while youth enjoyed the opportunity to be engaged in research, further development of the relationship between youth participants and the research team was necessary. This was due to the challenges imposed by protocols for accessing, working with, and gaining ethics approval for projects with First Nation youth, which created complications for direct collaboration between external researchers and indigenous youth participants. The research presented in this article avoided the challenges Bradford et al. (2017) encountered by implementing a culturally responsive manner of conducting photovoice interviews with indigenous youth through the development of local research partnerships. In this way, the article aims to fill the gap empirically and conceptually by applying a modified photovoice technique that can capture both the perspectives and experiences of indigenous youth, as well as their traditional knowledge and understanding of social and ecological change during the global disruption of COVID-19.
The next section contextualizes the photovoice project with a brief discussion on why photovoice and visual research tools need to be linked with traditional understandings of wellbeing to develop a culturally appropriate way of including indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during disaster times. The section thereafter discusses the modifications made to the study methods to enable remote data collection, designed to support the objective of providing a venue for indigenous youth to voice their experiences and ideas regarding concerns, issues, desires and values connected to the social and ecological wellbeing of their small island community in Rarotonga, Cook Islands.
2.1. Modifying photovoice for culturally responsive research
Modified versions of photovoice have become common within the existing literature as scholars seek to meet the realities and needs of communities (Castleden and Garvin, 2008; Badowski et al., 2011; Bennett and Dearden, 2013; Mitchell, 2017). As LaVeaux and Christopher (2009) note, the flexibility of photovoice is a particularly important aspect of its applicability where cultural considerations such as indigenous ways of knowing and learning, sovereignty, and extended timelines are essential to the research process. According to Wang and Burris (1997), photovoice can be “creatively and flexibly adapted to the needs of its users” (p. 383). In other words, photovoice is an adaptable method that is modifiable to fit a particular community's needs and preferences. This study modified the photovoice technique to develop a culturally appropriate method to include the voices of indigenous youth while still honoring the traditional values found in the tivaevae model of wellbeing in the Cook Islands.
In addition to illustrating the multifaceted concept of wellbeing, the tivaevae model is also considered a significant social phenomenon in the Cook Islands that represents the cultural process of sharing and transferring traditional knowledge and practices in research (Rongokea, 2001). Teremoana Maua-Hodges, a renowned leader in Pasifika education, adopted the tivaevae metaphor to underpin education and research in culturally responsive ways (Maua-Hodges, 2000). The application of tivaevae as a theoretical model for culturally responsive education and research comprises five key values: taokotai (collaboration), tu akangateitei (respect), uriuri kite (reciprocity), tu inangaro (relationships), and akairi kite (shared vision). These values are considered to shape the ways of knowing and being in the Cook Islands. For instance, during the making of the tivaevae, the concept of akairi kite (shared vision) holds great importance among Cook Islands women constructing the tapestry. Prior to making the tivaevae, women share stories and collectively decide on a shared vision of how the tivaevae is going to turn out (Te Ava et al., 2011). According to Rongokea (2001), the value of having a shared vision is culturally responsive because it recognizes the principles of tu akangateitei (respect), tu akakoromaki (patience), and tu kauraro (humility).
The reciprocal practices between teachers and students, researchers and participants, families and communities, are also represented in the making of the tivaevae as women develop uriuri kite (reciprocity) to produce akairi kite (shared vision). Finally, the process of developing tu inangaro (relationships) and the practice of taokotai (collaboration) is represented in the making of the tivaevae. Within the cultural metaphor, relationships start with family and expand out to the community, which is a process that is grounded in papa'anga (genealogy) and occurs over a period of time (Maua-Hodges, 2000). In summary, the tivaevae is a collaborative process of developing relationships over time, whereby the weaving of the tivaevae symbolizes the cultural values of a society that are considered essential to creating and sustaining a healthy community (Merriam and Mohamad, 2000). This study modified the photovoice technique to fit the traditional ways of knowing and conducting research in the Cook Islands by developing partnerships with local research partners and non-governmental organizations, and creating a shared vision of the research project in order to respectfully engage indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during the global disruption of COVID-19.
2.1.1. Developing local research partnerships
From January 2021 to April 2021, the research team in Auckland engaged in a series of Zoom meetings and email conversations with various local environmental and education NGOs in Rarotonga to discuss the potential of engaging indigenous youth in the exploration of social and environmental change. Dr Rerekura Teaurere, the second author of this paper, was instrumental during these consultation meetings. As a native Cook Islander from the outer island of Tongareva, Dr Rerekura Teaurere introduced the research team to Korero o te‘Orau. Given their extensive experience with environmental education programs for local youth, and their passion for protecting the culture, environment and natural resources of the Cook Islands, the research team was eager to collaborate with Korero o te‘Orau for the design and implementation of the photovoice research project. In turn, the NGO was interested in collaborating with the research team in hopes of increasing the visibility of their education programs and raise awareness on the need to develop environmental education courses that integrate traditional knowledge with modern science to improve natural resource management and conservation in the Cook Islands. Thus, it was agreed that both parties could benefit from collaborating on the photovoice research project.
It is critical to recognize, however, that the partnership between the research team in Auckland and Korero o te‘Orau would not have been possible without the cultural knowledge and support offered by Dr Rerekura Teaurere. Throughout the photovoice research project, Dr Rerekura Teaurere reminded the research team to uphold the Cook Islands cultural values of relationships, respect, and reciprocity while developing and nurturing partnerships with local stakeholders and indigenous youth participants. It is because of Dr Rerekura Teaurere's familiarity of the local social-cultural context, and her willingness to share her key contacts from her local network, that this photovoice project was able to be implemented. In summary, the relationships that developed between the research team in Auckland and the local environmental NGO in Rarotonga were an invaluable contribution to this study. This partnership ensured a culturally adequate engagement of indigenous youth in the exploration of social and environmental change across geographic and cultural borders during the disruption of COVID-19.
2.2. Adapting qualitative research for remote online data collection
The digital implementations of qualitative methods such as online interviews and focus group discussion have burgeoned since 2010 parallel to the advancements in information and communication technologies (Brüggen and Willems, 2009; Tuttas, 2015; Woodyatt et al., 2016; Lovrić et al., 2020; Howlett, 2022). In contrast to online interviews, however, the use of online photovoice has only recently emerged as an alternative modality (Lichty et al., 2019; Tanhan and Strack, 2020). According to scholars, there are a couple reasons that may have contributed to this. Chen (2022) argues that photovoice relies on the constant interactions between researchers and participants throughout the entire photovoice process, which could present challenges for online modifications. On a similar note, Liebenberg (2018) emphasizes the importance of building rapport between participants and facilitators for conscious building and developing trust, particularly with photovoice studies that involve marginalized, rural, or vulnerable communities who may not be able to afford and/or have access to internet technology. Despite these perceived constraints, the literature indicates that the use of online photovoice research has grown in recent years due to an increasing impetus to reach a broader audience by eliminating geographic constraints (Lichty et al., 2019; Chen, 2022).
2.2.1. Online photovoice research
In contrast to the traditional format of in-person photovoice research, which tends to focus on a small group of people within marginalized rural communities (Baldwin and Chandler, 2010; Berbés-Blázquez, 2012; Bennett and Dearden, 2013; Briggs et al., 2014), the use of online photovoice (OPV) has predominantly been used by researchers who seek to reach and engage with a larger group of participants across various geographic and cultural boundaries (Chen, 2022). For example, Lichty et al. (2019) were able to reach 120 youths across various states in the United States through the use of online blogs where the youths could share and reflect on their photographs while participating in online group discussions. Tanhan and Strack (2020) were the first to operationalise the OPV technique by designing the five-step process. The OPV five step process requires participants to first (1) individually identify a key topical issue, (2) submit photograph(s) with captions via an online questionnaire, (3) select one photograph, (4) identify themes from it, and (5) attend a photo exhibition at the end (Tanhan and Strack, 2020). Within the existing literature, a flurry of articles were found to use this five step process, which enabled researchers to easily reach over 100 participants (Tümkaya et al., 2021; Chen, 2022; Tanhan et al., 2023). The online photovoice technique used in this study, however, differs from the aforementioned OPV studies that aim to scale up participation to a larger, geographically dispersed audience. Rather than using blogs or websites to facilitate photo sharing and discussions with a large group of participants (Lichty et al., 2019; Call-Cummings and Hauber-Özer, 2021), the research presented in this article maintained the traditional format of in-person photovoice research in the sense that it focused on a small group of participants. The reason for applying online videoconferencing communication technologies was to facilitate real-time interaction between indigenous youth and researches despite the geographic limitations imposed by the travel restrictions of COVID-19. As the results indicate, the use of videoconferencing and advanced communication technologies enabled the research team to engage in a meaningful way with indigenous youth to develop a deeper understanding on how they perceive the wellbeing of their social and ecological environment.
Scholars have recognized the significant potential of online communication technologies, also known as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), to support qualitative data collection (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014; Braun et al., 2017; Archibald et al., 2019). Within the existing literature, VoIP technologies (e.g., Skype, Facetime, and Zoom), are often considered jointly with other asynchronous internet communication technologies, such as instant messaging, online focus groups, and email (Archibald et al., 2019). However, VoIP technologies differ significantly from asynchronous methods. While asynchronous online interviewing methods enable communication that occurs at different times, VoIP allows for real-time interaction involving sound, video, and written text (Sullivan, 2012). Thus, VoIP has the ability to transmit and respond to verbal and nonverbal cues, thereby replicating and possibly improving upon traditional methods such as face-to-face interviews (Braun et al., 2017).
Compared to in-person interviews or focus groups, communication technologies may be more attractive for researchers and research participants due to convenience, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility (Carter et al., 2012; Horrell et al., 2015). In studies that compared face-to-face interviews vs. online communication technologies, researchers found that online participants were more open and expressive (Cabaroglu et al., 2010), and that the quality of interviews did not differ from face-to-face interviews (Mabragana et al., 2013). Video conferencing has also been used to gain access to larger and more diverse populations (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014), conduct research with participants over a large geographical spread (Archibald et al., 2019), interview more participants in a shorter amount of time by eliminating travel (Winiarska, 2017), and reduce unpredictable circumstances, such as poor weather conditions that would deter participants from meeting face-to-face (Sedgwick and Spiers, 2009).
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, advances in online communication technologies and video conferencing offered opportunities for both quantitative (Casagrande et al., 2020; Ko et al., 2020) and qualitative researchers (Bender et al., 2021; Fawaz and Samaha, 2021) to adapt established methodologies in order to continue their research studies. For example, in a qualitative research study exploring youth alcohol consumption and family communication, Dodds and Hess (2020) had to shift their face-to-face interviews to online interviews. Their findings revealed that online platforms in qualitative research provided a safer and more comfortable environment by enabling youth participants to feel more relaxed and less intimated than in face-to-face contexts (Dodds and Hess, 2020). While there is a large body of knowledge that demonstrates the use of VoIP for various forms of qualitative research studies, literature on the use VoIP for online photovoice is limited (Chen, 2022). With the exception of a few studies that used online photovoice through the use of VoIP to explore the emotional impacts of COVID-19 on health care practitioners (Dare et al., 2021; Rania et al., 2021; Boamah et al., 2022; Osman and Singaram, 2022) no studies were found to use this modified technique to engage indigenous youth for the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during a global disruption. This paper contributes to the emerging online photovoice literature by exploring the potential of VoIP technologies in facilitating culturally responsive research and meaningful engagement with indigenous youth participants for the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during a global disruption.
2.3. Materials and equipment
In deciding which VoIP platform to use, a researcher needs to consider which program best fits their research needs. While there are many VoIP platforms for researchers to choose from, including Skype, Teams, Zoom, Zoho Meeting, Google Meet, GoToMeeting, Eyeson, and Microsoft Team (Gray et al., 2020), the majority of the existing research focuses on Skype (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014; Nehls et al., 2015; Braun et al., 2017). In a recent study on the use of VoIP programs for qualitative research, Gray et al. (2020) found no peer-reviewed published studies examining other VoIP platforms, such as Zoom. Given the limited existing literature, the lead investigator of this study selected a VoIP platform based on budget, user ease, administrative options, and personal level of comfort with the platform. After comparing various VoIP platforms, Zoom was chosen as the designated research tool to conduct photovoice interviews with indigenous youth participants in Rarotonga, Cook Islands.
Zoom is a collaborative, cloud-based videoconferencing service offering features including online meetings, group messaging services, and secure recording sessions (Zoom Video Communications Inc., 2016). Similar to other VoIPs, Zoom offers the opportunity for individuals in geographically dispersed areas to communicate with each other in real time via computer, tablets, or mobile devices (Zoom Video Communications Inc., 2016). Zoom does not require participants to have an account or download the software (Skype Technologies, 2018). Instead, participants can easily join the online meeting by simply clicking on a live link generated by Zoom. In this way, participants who are not familiar with advanced technologies that require complicated downloading procedures are less likely to be deterred by Zoom. Furthermore, downloading software in contexts that do not offer free access to internet may require participants to use their mobile data, which can be quite costly and may deter potential participants to partake in this study. Therefore, the ability to join a Zoom meeting by simply clicking on a live link offers a cost effective and convenient method for conducting online photovoice interviews.
Another advantage offered by Zoom is the screen-sharing ability for both the researchers and participants, which can be used to display information including the participant information sheet, the consent form, and the photographs taken by participants. Furthermore, Zoom includes password protection for confidentiality and recording capacity to either the host's computer or Zoom's cloud storage (Gray et al., 2020). This feature automatically saves the interview into two files, audio only and a combined audio video file, which maintains the in-person connection between the researcher and the participant while respecting the participant's choice about being recorded with audio and video or audio only.
The research team offered to provide funding for the purchase of disposable cameras. However, all youth participants had access to a camera, either via their own personal mobile phone camera, or a camera provided by the local environmental NGO. Youth participants used their own personal computers and/or mobile phones to participate in an online semi-structured interview. With regards to the videoconferencing platform Zoom, the software was free of charge for participants. The lead investigator purchased a monthly license fee of US $ 14.99, which enabled up to 30 h per meeting (compared to the 40 min limit offered in the free version). Participants did not need to purchase or download the software to join in a meeting.
3. The setting
The Cook Islands are self-governing small islands nation in free association with New Zealand, located in the South Pacific between Tahiti and American Samoa (Figure 3). The 15 atolls and islands that make up the Cook Islands are spread over ~2 million km2 (Cooke et al., 2021). Nearly 75% of the resident population of about 14,800 lives on the main island of Rarotonga (Cook Islands Statistics Office, 2018). The Cook Islands' economy has been described as “a small, open economy, dependent on imports, and whose economic growth is heavily reliant on the export sector dominated by tourism services accounting for about 70% of economic output” (Cooke et al., 2021, p. 260).
Figure 3. Map of the Cook Islands (World Atlas, 2021).
Prior to the global disruption of COVID-19, the Cook Islands reached a record high of nearly 167,000 international tourist arrivals in 2018/2019 (Cook Islands Government, 2020). Despite experiencing steady economic growth from the booming tourism sector, estimates of the Cook Islands output gap in 2019 indicated that the economy was operating above its capacity, with constraints in the form of labor, skills, and housing shortages (Cook Islands Government, 2019). Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate the negative environmental impacts associated with increasing tourism developments, including coastal erosion, increased pollution, and progressively degraded lagoons (Durbin, 2018; Prinz et al., 2020). In addition to the increasing anthropogenic pressures, the Cook Islands face the adverse effects of climate change and natural disasters, including rising sea levels, more intense tropical cyclones, heavy precipitation and flooding. The oceans and marine life, particularly coral reef ecosystems, are also severely threatened by ocean acidification, which is another result of the progressing climate change impacts (Masson-Delmotte et al., 2018).
Much of the literature that explores the double exposure presented by the climate change-tourism nexus in the Cook Islands and other PICs have a tendency to focus on the economic impacts of a storm, rather than the social and/or ecological impacts (Adger et al., 2011; Hallegatte, 2016; Fankhauser, 2017). Furthermore, limited (if any) studies focus on the perspectives and lived experiences of indigenous youth in the face of environmental and/or socio-economic disruptions. For these reasons, the heavily tourism-dependent island of Rarotonga, Cook Islands was selected as the setting to engage indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during the global disruption of COVID-19.
4. The recruitment of indigenous youth participants
Prior to recruiting youth participants, an ethics application was submitted and approved by the Auckland University of Technology Human Ethics Committee (AUTEC) on 19 April 2021. In this application, it was decided that a local staff member from Korero o te‘Orau, who did not hold any conflict of interest, would be responsible for the recruitment of high school students. In order to raise awareness on the environmental education programs offered by Korero o te‘Orau, it was imperative that the prospective youth participants were either currently enrolled or had previously participated in the NGO's programs. Since the 'tui'anga ki te Tango programme had only been in operation since 2017, there were limited available students that would be eligible to participate. Nevertheless, we were able to receive the voluntary consent of four young adolescent females, in addition to the consent of their parents. All details for the recruitment procedure of students can be found in the AUTEC application upon request.
Once the successful voluntary recruitment of indigenous youth participants was completed, the lead investigator of the research project emailed each student and their respective parent/guardian an information sheet which described the photovoice interview process. The email also included a consent and release form, parent/guardian consent form, and an ascent form. The students had 2 weeks to decide if they wanted to participate in the photovoice project. Prior to deciding, the local staff member encouraged all students and their parents/guardians to contact the lead investigator and Dr Rerekura Teaurere with any questions they may have pertaining to the research. After all participants and their respective guardians had an opportunity to ask questions, all four high school students emailed the lead investigator stating that they were willing to voluntarily participate in the photovoice research project.
Given the cultural context of the Cook Islands, the importance of building a relationship based on trust and friendship with participants was a critical component prior to commencing data collection. Thus, a Facebook group chat was created to build a relationship with the youth participants. All four youth participants, their respective guardians, and the local staff member of the NGO were invited in the Facebook messenger chat. Given the students' familiarity and comfort with the use of social media, the Facebook group chat proved to be an effective means of building rapport with the youth participants and maintaining communication throughout the entire photovoice project. Once again, the role of Dr Rerekura Teaurere was instrumental in bridging the cultural gap between the lead investigator and the youth participants. For example, even though the lead investigator was the designated key contact person in the Facebook group chat, all youth participants and NGO staff members directed their questions, comments, and concerns to Dr Rerekura Teaurere. It was only after a few weeks of open and honest communication that youth participants felt comfortable directly approaching the lead investigator. This again proves the importance of having a team member that is genuinely familiar and knowledgeable with the local context when conducting cross-cultural qualitative research.
4.1. Photovoice data collection process
The four indigenous youth participants were asked to take two to three photos of something they perceived as important and valuable for the wellbeing of their natural environment, and two to three photos of something they considered was important for the wellbeing of their community. Participants were initially given 2 weeks to complete the photographic component of the assignment. However, due to unforeseen circumstances and busy school schedules, participants completed the assignment in ~2 months. Such a delay would have presented various challenges if the research team was in-situ and were constrained by limited time and funding. However, this was not perceived as a challenge due to the remote nature of the research and the flexibility offered by the modified online photovoice technique.
After each participant had successfully taken their photos, they sent their photographs either via the Facebook group or by email. Once all photos had been documented and safely stored, the primary researcher and Dr Rerekura Teaurere invited each youth participant to participate in an online semi-structured interview via Zoom. During the online Zoom interviews, youth participants were asked to explain why they took each photograph, and what each photograph meant to them. They were reminded that there are no right or wrong answers. Dr Rerekura Teaurere was present during all four semi-structured Zoom interviews with youth participants to provide familiarity, and to help the primary researcher understand critical socio-cultural values and meanings as the youth shared their stories for each photograph they took. The online semi-structured interviews lasted between 45 min to 1 h each.
The aim of semi-structured interviews is to explore the subjective responses of participants regarding a particular phenomenon they have experienced, and the meanings they attribute to these experiences (Bartholomew et al., 2000). They offer a highly flexible approach to the interview process by using open-ended questions that define the area to be explored, from which the researcher and participants may diverge from to pursue an idea in more detail (Rakić and Chambers, 2012). Researchers are required to have a list of questions and topics pre-prepared when using semi-structured interviews, yet these questions can be asked in different ways with different participants (Schmidt, 2004). The flexibility of semi-structured interviews increases the responsiveness of the interview by allowing the researcher to ask probing questions and permitting participants to change the order of questions depending on their interest and willingness to elaborate on certain topics (Longhurst, 2003).
According to Galletta (2013), one of the main advantages of semi-structured interviews is that it has been found to be successful in enabling reciprocity between the researcher and participant by developing open-ended questions. In turn, open-ended questions enable the researcher to ask follow-up questions based on the participant's responses, and allows space for participants to elaborate on a particular subject of interest (Kallio et al., 2016). In this way, youth participants were free to respond to the open-ended questions as they wish, and the researchers probed these responses by asking follow-up questions to obtain additional information and gain a better understanding of the participants' viewpoint (Adams et al., 2010). Furthermore, the use of open-ended questions provoked a more thoughtful and reflexive approach to the photovoice method (Plunkett et al., 2013). From this position, this study combined the photovoice technique with open-ended questions to guide semi-structured interviews with indigenous youth participants.
5. Results: key lessons learned in applying photovoice and Zoom as research tools
The aim of this article is to illustrate the potential of online photovoice through the use of Zoom as a qualitative research tool to enable remote data collection while maintaining meaningful engagement with youth participants in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during the disruption of COVID-19. This section offers a summary of the key learnings. Selected findings are used to illustrate these key learnings.
The lead investigator analyzed the findings from the interview transcripts pertaining to each photograph. Data included photographs taken by youth participants and transcripts from the online semi-structured interviews conducted with each participant. The primary researcher transcribed all the interviews. While the process of transcribing deepened the lead investigator's understanding of the youth participants' lived experiences and perspectives of social and ecological change (Lester et al., 2020), it also revealed how the primary researcher's own initial reaction may have prematurely shut down an avenue of exploration. Thus, it was critical for Dr Rerekura Teaurere to read over the transcripts and discuss the cultural significance of the primary data with the lead investigator prior to engaging in further analysis. After the transcripts were revised by Dr Rerekura Teaurere and the lead investigator, they collectively explored the social and cultural value of the data. Then, the lead investigator coded the data independently.
A constant comparison method was applied to analyse the qualitative data in an iterative process (Charmaz, 2006). The lead investigator coded the data using the analysis process of constructive grounded theory, which consists of three coding stages: initial coding, focused coding and theoretical coding (Charmaz, 2006). During the initial coding stage, codes were created by inductively generating as many ideas as possible from the data. The codes assigned in the initial phase are often descriptive and reflect a relatively low level of inference (Lester et al., 2020). In the second stage of coding, referred to as focused coding, the lead investigator returned to passages in the data where codes were assigned during the initial coding phase, and began connecting statements, experiences, and reflections offered by youth participants to create codes at a higher level of inference (Anfara Jr et al., 2002).
As focused coding progressed, and codes (inter) related and contrasted with one another, categories began to emerge, which were grouped into themes. The development of categories represents an important intermediate step in the process of thematic analysis. The process of creating themes that are inclusive of all the underlying categories is known as theoretical coding. Theoretical coding involves recognizing similarities, differences, and relationships across categories, as well as being descriptive of their content and the relationships between them (Birks and Mills, 2015). Since themes are generally aligned with the conceptual or analytic goals of the study, the lead investigator grouped themes by questioning how the categories (inter) relate with each other in response to the study's primary question. The themes that emerged from the data were discussed with all members of the research team. Dr Rerekura Teaurere had a leading role in these cultural discussions, given her socio-cultural knowledge of the context and her invaluable contribution throughout the project.
The four final themes that evolved from the data analysis were traditional knowledge, the land, the sea, and the climate. Indigenous youth participants took photographs of the land, the sea, and impacts of climate change to describe how these elements influence the social and ecological wellbeing of their island home. For example, one participant took a picture of the vaka (a traditional seagoing vessel) as she reflected on the importance of learning about traditional knowledge to understand her ancestry, which allowed her to feel more connected to the ocean (Figure 4).
“Before we started learning about the vaka, I didn't really feel a connection towards it. It was kind of just there on the harbour. But now that we did the overnight sailing trip, I felt really connected to the ocean and to my ancestors and I realised that this is how they traveled, and why this is really important for us. We are voyagers, this is our history, it's our culture. So now when I see the vaka, I see my heritage right there! And its still going from centuries! We are still carrying it on!”
Figure 4. Photograph of the traditional seagoing canoe taken by an indigenous youth participant in Rarotonga, Cook Islands.
Photographs of culturally significant locations, native root crops, and traditional agricultural practices were also taken to illustrate the importance of traditional knowledge for the social and ecological wellbeing of the youths' small island community (Figure 5).
“Taro is very important to our culture because we survived on it for years, for generations. Taro plantations are a large part of our culture and agriculture. And its passed down from generations… This is really important for us to know, so when COVID-19 happens, or when similar issues like that happen, we have something we can come back to—a source of food that we can come back to. If we take care of the land it will take care of us.”
Figure 5. Photograph of a taro plantation in Rarotonga, Cook Islands taken by an indigenous youth participant.
Participants further discussed the changes they observed in their social and ecological environment during the global disruption of COVID-19 in terms of trade-offs. For example, one youth participant created a collage of her favorite places to reflect on the ways that tourism has impacted the social and ecological wellbeing of her community (Figure 6). In addition to observing the social and ecological changes during the COVID-19 disruption, all youth participants also discussed the economic hardships resulting from the sudden crash of the tourism sector, including the rising unemployment rates and the significant outward migration of Cook Islanders leaving to New Zealand in search of economic opportunities. In conclusion, the youth recognized that while the ecological and social environment benefitted in various ways during the global disruption of COVID-19, the financial crisis ensued by the crash of the tourism industry also contributed negative socio-economic impacts for the wellbeing of their community.
“I do see a positive change from COVID-19, it allowed our people to realise that we need to avoid becoming a mono-economy and relying only on tourism. With COVID-19, I realised that we are slowly shifting back into agricultural production and planting—I really do see a lot of families going back into planting taro as their food security, and they realised that with covid and everything going on around it, we might not get the chance to have a lot of supply of food and so we do realise that and we need to shift back into our agricultural practices.”
Figure 6. A collage of various different landscapes in Rarotonga, Cook Islands photographed by an indigenous youth participant.
As evidenced from the brief examples above, the combination of semi-structured interviews, open-ended questions, photovoice, and Zoom as qualitative research tools to engage indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological change proved to be empowering and inclusive methods that contributed many benefits to this study. To further support the former, youth participants were asked to reflect on their experience participating in this photovoice project. In their response, one participant stated the following:
“Personally, it was a really great experience using photos to help discuss the social and environmental issues in our home island. It helped me to look further through images to try find a deeper meaning or issues within it. I didn't realize how much you could get out of simple images. This opportunity helped me to have more awareness of social and environmental issues going on around me.”
Since the youth participants had only ever participated in one photovoice project, they were not able to compare their online photovoice experience with a face-to-face photovoice project. However, Dr Rerekura Teaurere, who has extensive research experience in Rarotonga provided her feedback on the use of VoIP for online photovoice:
“I noticed that participants were more than willing to go above and beyond contributing to the study with frequent communication compared to face-to-face interviews. Online interviewing means time in country is no longer a barrier to implementing respect, reciprocity, and building and maintaining relationships. Everyone involved in the online research gained something from it, and this strengthened research partnerships and made future research in the small communities of the Cook Islands more accessible.”
Evidently, the modified photovoice method applied in this study to engage indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during a global disruption contributed various benefits to both the researchers and participants in this study. As a gesture of reciprocity and appreciation for having participated in this project, a photovoice book was created and gifted to all youth participants, their respective guardians, and the local NGO. The research funds that were initially meant to cover travel costs were allocated to provide a salary for a local artist in Rarotonga, Cook Islands. The local artist designed a book with the photographs and subjective narratives derived from the youths' photovoice interviews. The research funds also covered the costs of professionally printing and binding 15 copies of the photovoice book in Auckland, New Zealand. The local NGO Korero o te‘Orau was able to use the photovoice book to disseminate the findings from the project to current and prospective donor partners to demonstrate the success of their programs, which may lead to more funding in the near future.
6. Discussion
The application of Zoom as a videoconference online communication platform to facilitate photovoice interviews provided a way to engage and include the perspectives and lived experiences of indigenous youth for the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during a global disruption. The inclusion of youths' perspectives on the social-ecological wellbeing of a small island community in the Pacific contributed to a unique holistic understanding of indigenous wellbeing that is rarely documented within the existing literature due to the cultural barriers that enforce social hierarchies in traditional Polynesian societies (Larmour, 2009; Taumoefolau, 2019; Poppelwell and Overton, 2022). This in turn enhanced the quality and credibility of the project's research findings.
The findings suggest that youth participants benefited from using the photovoice technique as it shares similar oral and visually oriented practices found in the application of the tivaevae model of wellbeing for culturally responsive research in the Cook Islands. For instance, the use of photography and subsequent semi-structured interviews enabled youth participants to document and discuss social and ecological changes during the disruption of COVID-19. As such, the application of a culturally responsive research technique enabled indigenous youth participants to grasp complex inter-sectoral impacts ensued by the global disruption of COVID-19. Furthermore, by respecting the Cook Islands cultural values of reciprocity, shared vision, and relationships, the modified photovoice technique enabled the research team to collectively create a shared vision of the research project by developing partnerships with local researchers, NGOs, and indigenous youth prior to conducting research. In terms of reciprocity, all local stakeholders involved in the project considered that the photovoice book was a generous and much appreciated gesture.
In personal communication with the lead investigator and Dr Rerekura Teaurere, youth participants described other benefits, including an increased awareness about the impacts of tourism on the wellbeing of their community and natural environment. Youth participants also claimed that by engaging in this photovoice project, they gained a deeper understanding on pre-existing issues, such as the challenges of depending on imported goods, or over-relying on the tourism sector to support the economy. They were thrilled to have the opportunity of participating in an international research project, where they could develop their analytical thinking skills through the use of photography and share their traditional knowledge and passion for environmental conservation. One participant even asked the principal investigator for a letter of recommendation as part of her application to a university in New Zealand to study environmental science. The findings further indicated the success of the environmental education programs offered by Korero o te‘Orau, particularly in their ability to teach indigenous youth how to integrate traditional knowledge with modern environmental science in practical ways that relate to contemporary issues.
With regards to the use of VoIP to enable online photovoice, one of the key advantages is that it eliminated the geographical limitations that frequently restrict a researcher's accessibility to key informants and participants (Jennings and Lowe, 2013; Gray, 2021). Recent publications that harnessed various digital tools and online technologies, including emails, online forms, digital posters, and social media, support the former by demonstrating the benefits of online photovoice in enhancing participation across geographic and cultural borders (Tanhan and Strack, 2020; Liegghio and Caragata, 2021; Chen, 2022; Oster et al., 2022). Howlett (2022) further points out that online photovoice techniques through the use of VoIP technologies offers opportunities for more personal and informal interactions between participants and researchers. Furthermore, in an era where researchers are being increasingly challenged to consider the greenhouse gas emissions and other impacts of their research activities, the option to undertake this research remotely without traveling has provided additional benefits in this regard.
6.1. Addressing key limitations of photovoice and video conferencing platforms
One of the limitations identified in this study is the relatively low number of participants. While four participants can still provide meaningful insights in the context of qualitative research, a larger sample size is preferred to avoid the potential of self-selection bias of technologically savvy students and those with access to modern technological devices. Regarding the use of VoIP for online photovoice, this project did not experience any limitations. However, scholars have raised concerns associated with the development and dissemination of participants' voices via the use of VoIP (Evans-Agnew and Rosemberg, 2016; Liebenberg, 2018). Since photovoice is largely driven by an agenda that emphasizes inclusion and social justice, Liebenberg (2018) encourages researchers to reflect on the instrumental use of photovoice in their studies and to consider whether it is used as a method to gather information about participants' lives without the underlying goal of social change. On a similar note, Abma et al. (2022) warn researchers about the use of photovoice when stripped from its original foundation, suggesting that it may even re-establish existing power differentials between experts and lay people. The research presented in this paper carefully considered the instrumental use of photovoice. Rather than using photovoice as a participatory research tool to drive social change, photovoice was used in this study to engage indigenous youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing during the disruption of COVID-19.
The online photovoice method can also raise ethical concerns relating to the visual exposure of people, places, and their privacy (Mitchell, 2017), particularly when involving youth participants (Alderson, 2014). Guillemin and Drew (2010) forewarned researchers about the additional ethical considerations that are required when sharing photographs online, particularly in group settings (Dare et al., 2021). The potential risks and ethical questions related to the involvement of youth in research using online photovoice were carefully considered and the approaches developed were independently reviewed and approved by the Auckland University of Technology Human Ethics Committee prior to conducting this research. This approach is widely supported as a key aspect of ensuring that research involving human participants, particularly youth, is undertaken following ethical principles.
Regarding the use of VoIP technologies for online qualitative data collection, qualitative researchers have discussed a number of ethical, practical, and international issues (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014; Seitz, 2016). With regards to inclusivity issues, Tanhan et al. (2023) argue that online photovoice favors those with access to social media and community groups/organizations, and excludes those that lack technological knowledge and/or access to digital devices. As Chen (2022) notes, these challenges raise questions on whether online photovoice deviates from photovoice's participatory ethos. Conversely, Evans-Agnew and Rosemberg (2016) argue that regardless of photovoice being used online or in-person, the extent of participation depends on the researchers' efforts to involve participants in the design of the project and establishing rapport with participants during the conceptualization stage of the project. On a similar note, Deakin and Wakefield (2014) warn researchers about the need to maintain rapport with participants, which may look different in VoIP than with face-to-face interviews. One way to help build rapport with participants is to exchange emails preceding the video conferencing (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014). Following these recommendations, communication with youth participants and their respective guardians was maintained through the Facebook group chat to build rapport and foster dialogue before data collection began, and while the project was running. Participants were also contacted after the completion of the research project to thank them for their time and valuable contribution to the study, and to offer them the opportunity to revise the transcript prior to analysis.
In terms of VoIP software, studies have reported challenges associated with the use of Skype, including dropped or paused calls, poor audio and video quality, and the inability to read non-verbal cues as a result of inconsistent and delayed connectivity (Weller, 2015). Furthermore, Skype does not currently offer the ability to securely record sessions and thus requires the use of third-party providers (Skype Technologies, 2018; Archibald et al., 2019). Over time, however, advances in VoIP technologies and new videoconferencing platforms, such as Zoom, have addressed these issues and improved services by offering enhanced performance and functionality (Kok et al., 2021). For example, a recent study of a web-based group intervention for survivors of ovarian cancer reported successfully switching from Skype to Zoom halfway through the study to resolve connectivity issues experienced with Skype (Kinner et al., 2018). Another study, which explored researchers' and participants' perceptions and experiences using Zoom for conducting interviews with a geographically dispersed group in Australia, described Zoom in positive terms owing to its convenience, ease of use, security, interactivity features (e.g., screen sharing), and its ability to facilitate personal connections between users (Archibald et al., 2019). Thus, by selecting Zoom over other VoIP platforms, this study successfully addressed some of the technical difficulties associated with online communication technologies. Given the limited available literature on Zoom's usability (Gray et al., 2020), this study contributes valuable insights by increasing the awareness of methodological options available to qualitative researchers. This in turn can help guide decisions about possible online applications to overcome context-specific obstacles which can enable remote data collection while developing positive partnerships between researchers and participants. In conclusion, the discussion provided helps evolve photovoice as an inclusive and adaptive method to a variety of disruptions, in addition to how and what VoIP technology is best to use.
7. Conclusion
The international travel restrictions imposed by the global disruption of COVID-19 presented significant challenges to qualitative research projects around the world, including the study presented in this article. To overcome the geographic limitations, however, our research team based in Auckland integrated the photovoice research method with advanced online communication systems. The application of Zoom as a videoconference online communication platform provided a way for the researchers in Auckland to meaningfully engage with indigenous youth in the Cook Islands. Furthermore, the modified photovoice technique proved to be a culturally responsive method of sharing and transferring traditional knowledge in the Cook Islands by respecting the cultural values of relationships, reciprocity, and a shared vision to conducting research. Finally, by including indigenous youths' perspectives on the social-ecological wellbeing of a small island community in the Pacific, the insights revealed in this study provide a unique holistic understanding of indigenous wellbeing that is rarely documented within the existing literature due to the cultural barriers that enforce social hierarchies in traditional Polynesian societies. In summary, the online modification for virtual photovoice enabled different forms of participation and enhanced collaborative and inclusive research that may otherwise not have occurred in-situ. From this perspective, the various obstacles encountered while striving to conduct qualitative research across cultural and geographical borders amidst a global disruption resulted in innovative, inclusive, and collaborative research methods that enriched the outcomes of the study.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.
Author contributions
RW was the lead investigator who designed the research project, lead the acquisition, conducted all transcriptions and data analysis, and wrote the entire article. RT contributed substantially to the conception and design of the work, supported the first author in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. MO and ML drafted and critically revised the work for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
To the founders of Korero o te‘Orau, thank you for the opportunity to learn from you and your outstanding environmental education programs. Your genuine passion and limitless work ethic to mentor young Cook Islanders in the field of science and traditional knowledge is admirable and contagious. To the youth participants, thank you so much for teaching the research team how you perceive and value your surrounding environment and community. The stunning photographs and insightful stories you shared with us have opened our eyes to a whole new dimension of socio-ecological wellbeing—the most valuable dimension of wellbeing, which belongs to the youth. To RT, who undertook the role of a supervisor, research partner, and cultural consultant, thank you for connecting us to your community and for patiently guiding us through your vastly rich culture. This research project would not have been possible without your support, generosity, and invaluable contributions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1. ^In Cook Islands Māori E'Aito means a warrior, and Tiaki Ipukarea means guardians of the land for future generations.
References
Abma, T., Breed, M., Lips, S., and Schrijver, J. (2022). Whose voice is it really? Ethics of photovoice with children in health promotion. Int. J. Qual. Methods 21, 16094069211072419. doi: 10.1177/16094069211072419
Adams, A., Theodore, D., Goldenberg, E., McLaren, C., and McKeever, P. (2010). Kids in the atrium: comparing architectural intentions and children's experiences in a pediatric hospital lobby. Soc. Sci. Med. 70, 658–667. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.049
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Nelson, D. R., Berkes, F., Eakin, H., Folke, C., et al. (2011). Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2, 757–766. doi: 10.1002/wcc.133
Agrawal, A., and Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Dev. 34, 149–166. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
Alderson, P. (2014). “Research by children,” in Ethics and Research in Inclusive Education, eds M. Nind, J. Rix, and K. Sheehy (London: Routledge), 61–75.
Aldinger, C., and Whitman, C. V. (2009). Case Studies in Global School Health Promotion: from Research to Practice. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-92269-0
Anfara Jr, V. A., Brown, K. M., and Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educ. Res. 31, 28–38. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031007028
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., and Lawless, M. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int. J. Qual. Methods 18, 1609406919874596. doi: 10.1177/1609406919874596
Armstrong, A. C., Johansson-Fua, S. U., and Armstrong, D. (2021). Reconceptualising inclusive education in the Pacific. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2021.1882057
Badowski, N., Castro, C. M., Montgomery, M., Pickering, A. J., Mamuya, S., and Davis, J. (2011). Understanding household behavioral risk factors for diarrheal disease in Dar es Salaam: a photovoice community assessment. J. Environ. Public Health. 2011, 130467. doi: 10.1155/2011/130467
Baldwin, C., and Chandler, L. (2010). “At the water's edge”: community voices on climate change. Local Environ. 15, 637–649. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2010.498810
Barnett, J., and Waters, E. (2016). “Rethinking the vulnerability of small island states: climate change and development in the Pacific Islands,” in The Palgrave Handbook of International Development, eds J. Grugel and D. Hammett (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK), 731–748. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_40
Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A. J., and Marcia, J. E. (2000). Coded Semistructured Interviews in Social Psychological Research.
Beh, A., Bruyere, B. L., and Lolosoli, S. (2013). Legitimizing local perspectives in conservation through community-based research: a photovoice study in Samburu, Kenya. Soc. Nat. Resour. 26, 1390–1406. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2013.805858
Bender, A. E., Berg, K. A., Miller, E. K., Evans, K. E., and Holmes, M. R. (2021). “Making sure we are all okay”: healthcare workers' strategies for emotional connectedness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Soc. Work J. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10615-020-00781-w
Bennett, N. J., and Dearden, P. (2013). A picture of change: using photovoice to explore social and environmental change in coastal communities on the Andaman Coast of Thailand. Local Environ. 18, 983–1001. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.748733
Benton, N. (1989). Education, language decline and language revitalisation: the case of Maori in New Zealand. Lang. Educ. 3, 65–82. doi: 10.1080/09500788909541252
Berbés-Blázquez, M. (2012). A participatory assessment of ecosystem services and human wellbeing in rural Costa Rica using photo-voice. Environ. Manage. 49, 862–875. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9822-9
Biggs, D., Biggs, R., Dakos, V., Scholes, R. J., and Schoon, M. (2011). Are we entering an era of concatenated global crises? Ecol. Soc. 16, 27. doi: 10.5751/ES-04079-160227
Boamah, S. A., Yous, M. L., Weldrick, R., Havaei, F., and Ganann, R. (2022). Using photovoice as a method for capturing the lived experiences of caregivers during COVID-19: a methodological insight. Int. J. Qual. Methods 21, 16094069221137494. doi: 10.1177/16094069221137494
Bonnemaison, J. (1985). The tree and the canoe: roots and mobility in Vanuatu societies. Pac. Viewp. 26, 30–62. doi: 10.1111/apv.261003
Bottrell, D., Dockett, S., and Groundwater-Smith, S. (2014). Participatory research with children and young people,” in Participatory Research with Children and Young People, eds S. Groundwater-Smith, S. Dockett, and D. Bottrell (London: SAGE), 1–216. doi: 10.4135/9781473910751
Bradford, L. E., Zagozewski, R., and Bharadwaj, L. A. (2017). Perspectives of water and health using photovoice with youths living on reserve. Can. Geogr. 61, 178–195. doi: 10.1111/cag.12331
Braun, V., Clarke, V., and Gray, D. (2017). “Innovations in qualitative methods,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology, ed B. Gough (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK), 243–266. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_13
Breslow, S. J., Sojka, B., Barnea, R., Basurto, X., Carothers, C., Charnley, S., et al. (2016). Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management. Environ. Sci. Policy 66, 250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023
Briggs, L. P., Stedman, R. C., and Krasny, M. E. (2014). Photo-elicitation methods in studies of children's sense of place. Child. Youth Environ. 24, 153–172. doi: 10.1353/cye.2014.0007
Brüggen, E., and Willems, P. (2009). A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi. Int. J. Mark. Res. 51, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/147078530905100301
Cabaroglu, N., Basaran, S., and Roberts, J. (2010). A comparison between the occurrence of pauses, repetitions and recasts under conditions of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: a preliminary study. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 9, 14–23.
Cai, Y. (2017). Photovoice for Vulnerability: Resilience Building in the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Cai, Y., and Marks, D. (2021). Photovoice in the age of social media: Helping to build participation needed for urban climate resilience? Urban Clim. 40, 101019. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101019
Call-Cummings, M., and Hauber-Özer, M. (2021). Virtual photovoice: methodological lessons and cautions. Qual. Rep. 26, 3214–3233. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4971
Campbell, J. R. (2014). Climate-change migration in the Pacific. Contemp. Pac. 1–28. doi: 10.1353/cp.2014.0023
Carter, M., Alwan, N. A., Burley, V., Wark, P. A., Evans, C. E., Greenwood, D. C., et al. (2012). Use of information and communication technology to improve dietary assessment and tackle obesity. Lancet 380, S29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60385-2
Casagrande, M., Favieri, F., Tambelli, R., and Forte, G. (2020). The enemy who sealed the world: effects quarantine due to the COVID-19 on sleep quality, anxiety, and psychological distress in the Italian population. Sleep Med. 75, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.05.011
Castleden, H., and Garvin, T. (2008). Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research. Soc. Sci. Med. 66, 1393–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030
Catalani, C., and Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ. Behav. 37, 424–451. doi: 10.1177/1090198109342084
Chambers, N. A., and Saddleman, D. (2020). Moving towards a language nest: stories and insights from nḱmalqs. First Peoples Child Fam. Rev. 15, 27–43. doi: 10.7202/1068361ar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Chen, J. (2022). Digitally dispersed, remotely engaged: interrogating participation in virtual photovoice. Qual. Res. 14687941221110175. doi: 10.1177/14687941221110175
Clark, A. (2010). Transforming Children's Spaces: Children's and Adults' Participation in Designing Learning Environments. London: Routledge.
Coats, C. (2014). Thinking through the photographic encounter: engaging with the camera as nomadic weapon. Int. J. Educ. Arts 15, 2014.
Connell, J. (2010). Pacific islands in the global economy: paradoxes of migration and culture. Singap. J. Trop. Geogr. 31, 115–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2010.00387.x
Cook Islands Government (2019). 2019/20 Half-Year Economic and Fiscal Update. Rarotonga: Cook Islands. Available online from: http://www.mfem.gov.ck/images/documents/economics_docs/Budget_Books/2019-~20_Half_Year_Economic_and_Fiscal_Update.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Cook Islands Government (2020). Cook Islands Government Budget Estimates 2020/21: Book 1 Appropriation Estimates and Commentary. Rarotonga, Cook Islands. June 2020. Available online at: http://mfem.gov.ck/images/MFEM_Documents/Budget_Books/2020-~21/2020-2024_Budget_Book_1_-_Estimates.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Cook Islands Statistics Office (2018). Census of Population and Dwellings 2016. Rarotonga, Cook Islands. Available online at: http://www.mfem.gov.ck/images/documents/Statistics_Docs/5.Census-~Surveys/6.Population-and-Dwelling_2016/2016_CENSUS_REPORT-FINAL.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Cook, T., and Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective: fun methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood 14, 29–45. doi: 10.1177/0907568207068562
Cooke, N., Hayes, I., and Moncada, S. (2021). Resilience Building to COVID-19 in the Pacific: A Cook Islands Case Study.
Corson, D. (1998). Community-based education for indigenous cultures. Lang. Cult. Curric. 11, 238–249. doi: 10.1080/07908319808666555
Cote, M., and Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36, 475–489. doi: 10.1177/0309132511425708
Croes, R., Ridderstaat, J., and Shapoval, V. (2020). Extending tourism competitiveness to human development. Ann. Tour. Res. 80, 102825. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.102825
Cruz-Garcia, G. S., Sachet, E., Blundo-Canto, G., Vanegas, M., and Quintero, M. (2017). To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America? Ecosyst. Serv. 25, 201–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.005
Dare, J., Seiver, H., Andrew, L., Coall, D. A., Karthigesu, S., Sim, M., et al. (2021). Co-creating visual representations of safe spaces with mental health service users using photovoice and zoom. Methods Psychol. 5, 100059. doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100059
Daw, T., Brown, K., Rosendo, S., and Pomeroy, R. (2011). Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 38, 370–379. doi: 10.1017/S0376892911000506
De Leeuw, S., and Hawkins, H. (2017). Critical geographies and geography's creative re/turn: poetics and practices for new disciplinary spaces. Gender Place Cult. 24, 303–324. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314947
De Scally, D., and Doberstein, B. (2022). Local knowledge in climate change adaptation in the Cook Islands. Clim. Dev. 14, 360–373. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2021.1927658
Deakin, H., and Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qual. Res. 14, 603–616. doi: 10.1177/1468794113488126
DeLoughrey, E. M. (2019). Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9781478005582
Dickson, G., Milne, S., and Werner, K. (2018). Collaborative capacity to develop an events portfolio within a small island development state: the Cook Islands. J. Policy Res. Tourism Leis. Events. 10, 69–89.
Diedrich, A., and Aswani, S. (2016). Exploring the potential impacts of tourism development on social and ecological change in the Solomon Islands. Ambio 45, 808–818. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0781-x
Dodds, S., and Hess, A. C. (2020). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research. J. Serv. Manag. 32, 203–217. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
Durbin, T. J. (2018). “What now, fishgate?” scandal, marae moana, and nation making in the cook islands. Contemp. Pacific 30, 1–31.
Evans-Agnew, R. A., and Rosemberg, M.-A. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: whose voice? Qual. Health Res. 26, 1019–1030. doi: 10.1177/1049732315624223
Fankhauser, S. (2017). Adaptation to climate change. Ann. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9, 209–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-033554
Fawaz, M., and Samaha, A. (2021). E-learning: depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine. Nurs. Forum 56, 52–57. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12521
Filho, W., ed (2020). “Climate change and the Pacific Region: some future trends,” in Managing Climate Change Adaptation in the Pacific Region (New York, NY: Springer), 313–320. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40552-6_16
Fletcher, M.-S., Hamilton, R., Dressler, W., and Palmer, L. (2021). Indigenous knowledge and the shackles of wilderness. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2022218118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022218118
Fotu, K., Millar, L., Mavoa, H., Kremer, P., Moodie, M., Snowdon, W., et al. (2011). Outcome results for the Ma'alahi Youth Project, a Tongan community-based obesity prevention programme for adolescents. Obes. Rev. 12, 41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00923.x
Freire, P. (1970). “Pedagogy of the oppressed,” in Toward a Sociology of Education, eds J. Beck, C. Jenks, N. Keddie, and M. F. D. Young (London: Routledge), 374–386.
Fry, G. (2019). Framing the Islands: Power and Diplomatic Agency in Pacific Regionalism. Canberra, ACT: ANU Press. doi: 10.22459/FI.2019
Futter-Puati, D., and Maua-Hodges, T. (2019). Stitching tivaevae: a Cook Islands research method. AlterNative Int. J. Indig. Peoples 15, 140–149. doi: 10.1177/1177180119836788
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the Semi-structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication (Vol. 18). New York, NY: NYU press.
Gegeo, D. W. (2001). Cultural rupture and indigeneity: the challenge of (re) visioning “place” in the Pacific. Contemp. Pac. 13, 491–507. doi: 10.1353/cp.2001.0052
Glasgow, A. (2019). Ko toku reo ko toku ia Mana: My Language, My Identity-The Pacific Language Nest: How Language, Culture and Traditions are Supported and Promoted for the Pacific Communities of the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Good, M. K. (2012). Modern Moralities, Moral Modernities: Ambivalence and Change among Youth in Tonga. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
Gould, W. A., Fain, S., Pares, I., McGinley, K., Perry, A., and Steele, R. (2015). Caribbean Regional Climate Sub Hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 67.
Grace, D. J., and Ku'ulei Serna, A. (2013). Early childhood education and care for Native Hawaiian children in Hawai ‘i: a brief history. Early Child Dev. Care 183, 308–320. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2012.673487
Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., and Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: zoom video communications. Qual. Rep. 25, 1292–1301. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212
Guillemin, M., and Drew, S. (2010). Questions of process in participant-generated visual methodologies. Vis. Stud. 25, 175–188. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.502676
Harper, K. (2012). Visual interventions and the “crises in representation” in environmental anthropology: researching environmental justice in a Hungarian Romani neighborhood. Hum. Organ. 71, 292–305. doi: 10.17730/humo.71.3.kl245rp447811627
Hau'ofa, E. (1994). Thy kingdom come: the democratization of aristocratic Tonga. Contemp. Pac. 414–428.
Hooper, A. (1993). “Socio-cultural aspects of development,” in The Future of Asia-Pacific Economies: Pacific Islands at the Crossroads? eds S. Tambunlertchai, R. V. Cole, and Asian and Pacific Development Centre (Aurora, CO: Asian and Pacific Development Centre), 314.
Horrell, B., Stephens, C., and Breheny, M. (2015). Online research with informal caregivers: opportunities and challenges. Qual. Res. Psychol. 12, 258–271. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2015.1040318
Howlett, M. (2022). Looking at the “field” through a Zoom lens: methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qual. Res. 22, 387–402. doi: 10.1177/1468794120985691
Hunter, R., Hunter, J., and Anthony, G. (2018). Joining the Pieces of the Tivaevae to Enact Strength-based Mathematics for Pasifika Students in Aotearoa New Zealand. Ipu Kereru. Available online at: https://nzareblog.wordpress.com/2018/05/29/tivaevae-1/ (accessed 20 March 2023).
James, K. (2003). Is there a Tongan middle class? Hierarchy and protest in contemporary Tonga. Contemp. Pac. 309–336. doi: 10.1353/cp.2003.0042
Jennings, D., and Lowe, J. (2013). Photovoice: Giving voice to Indigenous youth. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health. 11, 521–537.
Johansson-Fua, S. U. (2016). The Oceanic researcher and the search for a space in comparative and international education. Int. Educ. J. Comp. Perspect. 15, 30–41.
Jolly, M. (2007). Imagining Oceania: indigenous and foreign representations of a sea of islands. Contemp. Pac. 508–545. doi: 10.1353/cp.2007.0054
Kallio, H., Pietil,ä, A. M., Johnson, M., and Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J. Adv. Nurs. 72, 2954–2965. doi: 10.1111/jan.13031
Kennedy, J. (2019). Relational cultural identity and pacific language education. Int. Educ. J. Comp. Perspect. 18, 26–39.
Kinner, E. M., Armer, J. S., McGregor, B. A., Duffecy, J., Leighton, S., Corden, M. E., et al. (2018). Internet-based group intervention for ovarian cancer survivors: feasibility and preliminary results. JMIR Cancer 4, e8430. doi: 10.2196/cancer.8430
Klepp, S., and Herbeck, J. (2016). The politics of environmental migration and climate justice in the Pacific region. J. Human Rights Environ. 7, 54–73. doi: 10.4337/jhre.2016.01.03
Ko, N. Y., Lu, W. H., Chen, Y. L., Li, D. J., Wang, P. W., Hsu, S. T., et al. (2020). COVID-19-related information sources and psychological well-being: an online survey study in Taiwan. Brain Behav. Immun. 87, 153. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.019
Kok, K. Y., Chen, L., Idris, F. I., Mumin, N. H., Ghani, H., Zulkipli, I. N., et al. (2021). Conducting multiple mini-interviews in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Educ. Online 26, 1891610. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1891610
Kong, T. M., Kellner, K., Austin, D. E., Els, Y., and Orr, B. J. (2015). Enhancing participatory evaluation of land management through photo elicitation and photovoice. Soc. Nat. Resour. 28, 212–229. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.941448
Kothari, U., and Arnall, A. (2017). Contestation over an island imaginary landscape: the management and maintenance of touristic nature. Environ. Plan. A 49, 980–998. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16685884
Kulp, S. A., and Strauss, B. H. (2019). New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–12.
Lange, R. T. (2017). Island Ministers: Indigenous Leadership in Nineteenth Century Pacific Islands Christianity. Canberra, ACT: Pandanus Books.
Larmour, P. (2009). “13 Corruption, culture and institutions,” in Preventing Corruption in Asia: Institutional Design and Policy Capacity, Vol. 15, eds T. Gong and S. K. Ma (New York, NY: Routledge), 206.
LaVeaux, D., and Christopher, S. (2009). Contextualizing CBPR: key principles of CBPR meet the Indigenous research context. Pimatisiwin 7, 1.
Le Fanu, G. (2013). The inclusion of inclusive education in international development: lessons from Papua New Guinea. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 33, 139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.006
Lee, H. (2019). “The new nobility: tonga's young traditional leaders,” in Pacific Youth: Local and Global Futures, ed H. Lee (Canberra, ACT: ANU Press), 111–136. doi: 10.22459/PY.2019.05
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., and Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: a starting point. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 19, 94–106. doi: 10.1177/1534484320903890
Lichty, L., Kornbluh, M., Mortensen, J., and Foster-Fishman, P. (2019). Claiming online space for empowering methods: taking photovoice to scale online. Glob. J. Community Psychol. Pract. 10, 1–26.
Liebenberg, L. (2018). Thinking critically about photovoice: achieving empowerment and social change. Int. J. Qual. Methods 17, 1609406918757631. doi: 10.1177/1609406918757631
Liegghio, M., and Caragata, L. (2021). COVID-19 and youth living in poverty: the ethical considerations of moving from in-person interviews to a photovoice using remote methods. Femin. Inq. Soc. Work. 36. doi: 10.1177/0886109920939051
Lovrić, R., Farčić, N., Mikšić, Š., and Včev, A. (2020). Studying during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative inductive content analysis of nursing students' perceptions and experiences. Educ. Sci. 10, 188. doi: 10.3390/educsci10070188
Luetz, J. M., and Nunn, P. D. (2020). “Climate change adaptation in the pacific islands: a review of faith-engaged approaches and opportunities,” in Managing Climate Change Adaptation in the Pacific Region, eds W. Leal Filho (New York, NY: Springer International Publishing), 293–311. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40552-6_15
Mabragana, M., Carballo-Diéguez, A., and Giguere, R. (2013). Young women's experience with using videoconferencing for the assessment of sexual behavior and microbicide use. Telemed. e-Health 19, 866–871. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0008
Maia, M., Nascimento, M., and Whan, C. (2018). The mãori language nest program: voices of language and culture revitalization in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Ecolinguística Rev. Brasil. Ecol. Ling. 4, 76–95.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2013). “On the coloniality of being: contributions to the development of a concept1,” in Globalization and the Decolonial Option, eds W. D. Mignolo, and Escobar (London: Routledge), 94–124.
Marrero, A., and Mattei, J. (2022). Reclaiming traditional, plant-based, climate-resilient food systems in small islands. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e171–e179. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00322-3
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., et al. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1, 43–50.
Masterson, V. A., Mahajan, S. L., and Teng,ö, M. (2018). Photovoice for mobilizing insights on human well-being in complex social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 23, 13. doi: 10.5751/ES-10259-230313
Maua-Hodges, T. (2000). Ako pai ki Aitutaki: Transporting or Weaving Cultures: Research Report of Field Experiences to the Cook Islands. Wellington: Wellington College of Education.
McCaffery, J., and McFall-McCaffery, J. T. (2010). O Tatou O Aga'I I Fea?/'Oku Tau O Ki Fe?/Where Are We Heading? Pacific languages in Aotearoa/New Zealand. AlterNative 6, 86–121. doi: 10.1177/117718011000600203
McFall-McCaffery, J. T., and Cook, S. (2016). Indigenous Approaches at Play in Creating Positive Student Outcomes in a Tertiary Institution.
McGree, S., Whan, K., Jones, D., Alexander, L., Imielska, A., Diamond, H., et al. (2014). An updated assessment of trends and variability in total and extreme rainfall in the western Pacific. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 2775–2791.
McMichael, C., Farbotko, C., and McNamara, K. E. (2019). Climate-Migration Responses in the Pacific Region. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merriam, S. B., and Mohamad, M. (2000). How cultural values shape learning in older adulthood: the case of Malaysia. Adult Educ. Quart. 51, 45–63. doi: 10.1177/074171360005100104
Milner-Gulland, E. J., McGregor, J., Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Bevan, P., Clements, T., et al. (2014). Accounting for the impact of conservation on human well-being. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1160–1166. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12277
Mitchell, C. (2017). “The girl should just clean up the mess” on studying audiences in understanding the meaningful engagement of young people in policy-making. Int. J. Qual. Methods 16, 1609406917703501. doi: 10.1177/1609406917703501
Mitchell, F. M., Billiot, S., and Lechuga-Peña, S. (2020). Utilizing photovoice to support Indigenous accounts of environmental change and injustice. Genealogy 4, 51. doi: 10.3390/genealogy4020051
Nehls, K., Smith, B. D., and Schneider, H. A. (2015). “Video-conferencing interviews in qualitative research,” in Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology, ed S. Hai-Jew (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 140–157. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6493-7.ch006
Newsom, L. A., and Wing, E. S. (2004). On Land and Sea: Native American uses of Biological Resources in the West Indies. Tuscaloosa, AB: University of Alabama Press.
Nunn, P. D., McLean, R., Dean, A., Fong, T., Iese, V., Katonivualiku, M., et al. (2020). Adaptation to climate change: contemporary challenges and perspectives. Climate Change and Impacts in the Pacific, ed L. Kumar (New York, NY: Springer), 499–524. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32878-8_14
Nunn, P. D., Mulgrew, K., Scott-Parker, B., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D., Mahar, D., et al. (2016). Spirituality and attitudes towards nature in the Pacific Islands: insights for enabling climate-change adaptation. Clim. Change 136, 477–493. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1646-9
Osman, I., and Singaram, V. (2022). Using photovoice to understand mindfulness in health care practitioners. Health SA Gesondheid 27, 1–10. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1942
Oster, C., Skelton, C., Venning, A., Fairweather, K., and Redpath, P. (2022). A pathway through the uncanny: a phenomenological photovoice study of Australian university students' experiences of physical activity during COVID-19. Health Soc. Care Community 30, e2214–e2225. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13659
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., and Armstrong de Almeida, A.-E. (2006). Language discourses and ideologies at the heart of early childhood education. Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling. 9, 310–341. doi: 10.1080/13670050608668652
Paris, D., and Winn, M. T. (2013). Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities. London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781544329611
Pascht, A. (2011). Land rights in Rarotonga (Cook Island): traditions and transformations. Pac. Stud. 34, 28–28.
Pawlowski, M., Riva, M., Fletcher, C., Lyonnais, M.-C., and Arsenault-Hudon, D. (2022). Youth perspectives on community health in Nunavik: a community-engaged photovoice project. Can. J. Public Health 1–13. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00687-9
Plunkett, R., Leipert, B. D., and Ray, S. L. (2013). Unspoken phenomena: using the photovoice method to enrich phenomenological inquiry. Nurs. Inq. 20, 156–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2012.00594.x
Poppelwell, E., and Overton, J. (2022). Culture, scale and the adaptation of good governance: insights from SOEs in Samoa and Tonga. World Dev. Perspect. 28, 100468. doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100468
Prinz, N., Story, R., Lyon, S., Ferse, S. C., and Bejarano, S. (2020). To feed or not to feed? Coral reef fish responses to artificial feeding and stakeholder perceptions in the Aitutaki Lagoon, Cook Islands. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 145. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00145
Pulotu-Endemann, F. K., and Tu'itahi, S. (2009). Fonofale: Model of Health. Fuimaono Karl Pulotu-Endemann.
Rakić, T., and Chambers, D. (2012). An Introduction to Visual Research Methods in Tourism. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203855867
Ramey, H. L., Rayner, M.-E., Mahdy, S. S., Lawford, H. L., Lanctot, J., Campbell, M., et al. (2019). The Young Canadians Roundtable on Health: promising practices for youth and adults working in partnership. Can. J. Public Health 110, 626–632. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00254-9
Rania, N., Coppola, I., and Pinna, L. (2021). Adapting qualitative methods during the COVID-19 era: factors to consider for successful use of online photovoice. Qual. Rep. 26, 2711–2729. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4863
Rivas, V. A. (2019). Mapping a people to come: lessons from stressed islands and island assemblages in archipelagic Southeast Asia and other transversals. Shima. doi: 10.21463/shima.13.2.09
Rongokea, L. (2001). The Art of Tivaevae: Traditional Cook Islands Quilting. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Russo, S., Hissa, K., Murphy, B., and Gunson, B. (2021). Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: a comparative case-study approach. Qual. Res. 21, 568–585. doi: 10.1177/1468794120934398
Sarti, A., Schalkers, I., Bunders, J. F., and Dedding, C. (2018). Around the table with policymakers: giving voice to children in contexts of poverty and deprivation. Action Res. 16, 396–413. doi: 10.1177/1476750317695412
Scheyvens, R., and Momsen, J. (2008). Tourism in small Island States: from vulnerability to strengths. J. Sustain. Tour. 16, 491–510. doi: 10.1080/09669580802159586
Scheyvens, R., Movono, A., Strickland, D., Bibi, P., Tasere, A., Hills, G., et al. (2020). Development in a World of Disorder: Tourism, COVID-19 and the Adaptivity of South Pacific People.
Schmidt, C. (2004). “The analysis of semi-structured interviews,” in A Companion to Qualitative Research, eds U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, and I. Steinke (Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH), 253–258.
Scott-Parker, B., Nunn, P. D., Mulgrew, K., Hine, D., Marks, A., Mahar, D., et al. (2017). Pacific Islanders' understanding of climate change: Where do they source information and to what extent do they trust it? Region. Environ. Chang. 17, 1005–1015.
Sedgwick, M., and Spiers, J. (2009). The use of videoconferencing as a medium for the qualitative interview. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8, 1–11. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800101
Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note. Qual. Res. 16, 229–235. doi: 10.1177/1468794115577011
Siisiialafia-Mau, T. (2021). Youth Inclusion is Much More Than Having Voices Heard. Available online at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2021/06/tahere-siisiialafia-mau-youth-inclusion-much-more-having-voices-heard (accessed May 21, 2023).
Skype Technologies. (2018). How can I record my Skype calls? Available online at: https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA12395/howcan-i-record-my-skype-calls
Smith Tuhiwai, L. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zedbooks Ltd.
Spiegel, S. J., Thomas, S., O'neill, K., Brondgeest, C., Thomas, J., Beltran, J., et al. (2020). Visual storytelling, intergenerational environmental justice and indigenous sovereignty: Exploring images and stories amid a contested oil pipeline project. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 2362.
Steiner, C. E. (2015). A sea of warriors: performing an identity of resilience and empowerment in the face of climate change in the Pacific. Contemp. Pac. 27, 147–180. doi: 10.1353/cp.2015.0002
Sullivan, J. R. (2012). Skype: an appropriate method of data collection for qualitative interviews? Hilltop Rev. 6, 10.
Summers, J., Smith, L., Case, J., and Linthurst, R. (2012). A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio 41, 327–340. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0256-7
Tabe, T. (2011). Sapon Riki Ba Kain Toromon: A Study of the I-Kiribati Community in Solomon Islands.
Tanhan, A., Boyle, C., Taş, B., Sögüt, Y., Cashwell, C. C., Genc, E., et al. (2023). Using online photovoice and community-based participatory research to understand facilitators and barriers to online distance education during COVID-19. Dist. Educ. 44, 40–65.
Tanhan, A., and Strack, R. W. (2020). Online photovoice to explore and advocate for Muslim biopsychosocial spiritual wellbeing and issues: ecological systems theory and ally development. Curr. Psychol. 39, 2010–2025. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00692-6
Taufe'ulungaki, A. (2004). Fonua: reclaiming Pacific communities in Aotearoa. LotuMo'ui: Pacific Health Symposium Counties-Manukau District Health Board. Auckland: Waipuna Hotel.
Te Ava, A., Airini, A., and Rubie-Davies, C. (2011). Akarakara akaouanga i te kite pakari o te kuki airani: Culturally responsive pedagogy. Pacific-Asian Educ. 23, 117–128.
Te Ava, A., and Page, A. (2020). How the Tivaevae Model can be used as an Indigenous methodology in Cook Islands education settings. Aust. J. Indig. Educ. 49, 70–76. doi: 10.1017/jie.2018.9
Temudo, M. P., and Abrantes, M. B. (2013). Changing policies, shifting livelihoods: the fate of agriculture in Guinea-Bissau. J. Agrar. Change 13, 571–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00364.x
Thaman, K. H. (2003). Decolonizing Pacific studies: indigenous perspectives, knowledge, and wisdom in higher education. Contemp. Pac. 15, 1–17. doi: 10.1353/cp.2003.0032
Thaman, K. H. (2008). “Nurturing relationships and honouring responsibilities: a pacific perspective,” in Living Together (New York, NY: Springer), 173–187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9816-1_11
Thomas, R. M. (1993). Education in the South Pacific: the context for development. Comp. Educ. 29, 233–248. doi: 10.1080/0305006930290302
Tiraa, A. (2006). Ra'ui in the Cook Islands- today's context in Rarotonga. Tradit. Mar. Resour. Manag. Knowl. Inf. Bull. 19, 11–15.
Toumu'a, R., Sanga, K., and Johansson-Fua, S. (2016). Weaving Education Theory and Practice in Oceania. Nuku'alofa, Tonga/Oceania: Institute of Education, University of the South Pacific.
Tu'itahi, S., Watson, H., Egan, R., Parkes, M. W., and Hancock, T. (2021). Waiora: the importance of Indigenous worldviews and spirituality to inspire and inform Planetary Health Promotion in the Anthropocene. Glob. Health Promot. 28, 73–82. doi: 10.1177/17579759211062261
Tümkaya, S., Kayiran, B. K., Tanhan, A., and Arslan, Ü. (2021). Using online photovoice (OPV) to understand youths' perceptions of distance education during COVID-19. Int. J. Educ. Literacy Stud. 9, 45–60. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.4p.45
Tuttas, C. A. (2015). Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual. Health Res. 25, 122–133. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549602
Uitto, J. I., and Shaw, R. (2016). Sustainable Development and Disaster Risk Reduction: Introduction. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55078-5_1
United Nations Children's Foundation (2017). Situation Analysis of Children in the Cook Islands. Available online at: https://www.unicef.org/pacificislands/media/1086/file/Situation-Analysis-of-Children-Cook-Islands.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Vaka'uta, N. (2011). Reading Ezra 9/10 Tu'a-wise: Rethinking Biblical Interpretation in Oceania. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
Vansteenkiste, T., Morrens, M., and Westerhof, G. J. (2021). Images of recovery: a photovoice study on visual narratives of personal recovery in persons with serious mental illness. Community Ment. Health J. 57, 1151–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00746-w
Veron, S., Mouchet, M., Govaerts, R., Haevermans, T., and Pellens, R. (2019). Vulnerability to climate change of islands worldwide and its impact on the tree of life. Sci. Rep. 9, 14471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51107-x
Wang, C., and Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ. Behav. 24, 369–387. doi: 10.1177/109019819702400309
Wang, C. C., and Pies, C. A. (2004). Family, maternal, and child health through photo voice. Matern. Child Health J. 8, 95–102.
Wang, C. C., and Redwood-Jones, Y. A. (2001). Photovoice ethics: perspectives from flint photovoice. Health Educ. Behav. 28, 560–572. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800504
Weir, T., Dovey, L., and Orcherton, D. (2017). Social and cultural issues raised by climate change in Pacific Island countries: an overview. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1017–1028. doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1012-5
Weller, S. (2015). The Potentials and Pitfalls of using SKYPE for Qualitative (longitudinal) Interviews.
Wexler, L., Rataj, S., Ivanich, J., Plavin, J., Mullany, A., Moto, R., et al. (2019). Community mobilization for rural suicide prevention: process, learning and behavioral outcomes from Promoting Community Conversations About Research to End Suicide (PC CARES) in Northwest Alaska. Soc. Sci. Med. 232, 398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.028
Wickberg, S. (2013). Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Fiji. Available online at: https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Overview_of_corruption_and_anti-corruption_in_Fiji.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Winiarska, A. (2017). Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Application, Potentials and Challenges in the Context of Migration Research.
Woodyatt, C. R., Finneran, C. A., and Stephenson, R. (2016). In-person versus online focus group discussions: a comparative analysis of data quality. Qual. Health Res. 26, 741–749. doi: 10.1177/1049732316631510
World Atlas (2021). Cook Islands. Available online at: https://www.worldatlas.com/maps/cook-islands (accessed January 22, 2021).
World Health Organization (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children and Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zoom Video Communications Inc. (2016). Security Guide. Zoom Video Communications Inc. Available online at: https://d24cgw3uvb9a9h.cloudfront.net/static/81625/doc/Zoom-Security-WhitePaper.pdf (accessed May 21, 2023).
Keywords: photovoice, Zoom, indigenous youth, local research partnerships, social and ecological wellbeing, global disruption, tourism, Pacific Island states
Citation: Waegh Rd, Teaurere R, Orams M and Lück M (2023) Online photovoice to engage indigenous Cook Islands youth in the exploration of social and ecological wellbeing amidst a global disruption. Front. Sustain. Tour. 2:1172034. doi: 10.3389/frsut.2023.1172034
Received: 23 February 2023; Accepted: 08 June 2023;
Published: 27 June 2023.
Edited by:
Elaine Chiao Ling Yang, Griffith University, AustraliaReviewed by:
Wiebke Finkler, University of Otago, New ZealandYim Ming Connie Kwong, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (LG), Germany
Copyright © 2023 Waegh, Teaurere, Orams and Lück. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Roxane de Waegh, roxane.dewaegh@autuni.ac.nz