The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Soc. Psychol.
Sec. Gender, Sexuality and Relationships
Volume 2 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/frsps.2024.1466577
The Evaluative Process Model of Objectification: How men's evaluations of patriarchal security and women's fit with conventional beauty and sexuality norms interact to predict perpetration of sexually objectifying behaviors
Provisionally accepted- 1 Sevilla University, Seville, Spain
- 2 Carroll University, Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States
- 3 Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- 4 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Scholars have expanded upon the original scope of Objectification Theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), but theoretical and empirical research on objectification from the perceiver perspective remains underdeveloped. The literature focused on the perceiver perspective has narrowly focused on objectification perpetrated toward extremely attractive and sexualized women, despite objectification being a universal experience amongst all women. In the current paper, we propose the Evaluative Process Model of Objectification (EPO) to predict who sexually objectifies and why women are treated as sexual objects, to then answer toward whom and how sexual objectification may be directed. In particular, the EPO considers perceived attributes of female targets in conjunction with male perceivers' feelings of power. Extending Objectification Theory's suggestion that objectification is pervasive because of the patriarchal cultures women live in, the EPO suggests that objectification is instrumental in men's attempts to preserve and regain their position within the patriarchy. Among men who endorse patriarchal ideologies, perceived patriarchy threat or security is theorized to interact with evaluations of female targets to predict whether objectifying perceptions of female targets result in benevolent, derogative, or dismissive objectifying behaviors. After articulating the EPO, we propose hypotheses to be tested in future research and conclude with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.
Keywords: sexual objectification, Patriarchy and masculinity, Sexism, Self-objectification, power
Received: 18 Jul 2024; Accepted: 06 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Sáez, Riemer, Klein and Gervais. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sarah J Gervais, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, 68588, Nebraska, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.