Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Sustain. Cities, 23 July 2024
Sec. Health and Cities
Volume 6 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1458100

Corrigendum: Use of crowdsourced online surveys to study the impact of architectural and design choices on wellbeing

This article is a correction to:

  1. Use of Crowdsourced Online Surveys to Study the Impact of Architectural and Design Choices on Wellbeing

    1. Read original article
\nBasma Altaf &#x;Basma Altaf1*†Eva Bianchi &#x;Eva Bianchi1*†Isabella P. DouglasIsabella P. Douglas1Kyle DouglasKyle Douglas1Brandon ByersBrandon Byers1Pablo E. ParedesPablo E. Paredes2Nicole M. ArdoinNicole M. Ardoin3Hazel R. MarkusHazel R. Markus4Elizabeth L. MurnaneElizabeth L. Murnane5Lucy Z. BencharitLucy Z. Bencharit6James A. LandayJames A. Landay7Sarah L. BillingtonSarah L. Billington1
  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 3Graduate School of Education and the Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 4Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 5School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States
  • 6Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States
  • 7Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

A corrigendum on
Use of crowdsourced online surveys to study the impact of architectural and design choices on wellbeing

by Altaf, B., Bianchi, E., Douglas, I. P., Douglas, K., Byers, B., Paredes, P. E., Ardoin, N. M., Markus, H. R., Murnane, E. L., Bencharit, L. Z., Landay, J. A., and Billington, S. L. (2022). Front. Sustain. Cities 4:780376. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.780376

In the published article, there was an error in Tables 4, 6, 8 as published. The effect sizes in our tables were mislabeled as “η2” (eta-squared) but should have been labelled as “ηg2” (generalized eta-squared). All instances have been replaced by “ηg2”.

The corrected Tables 4, 6, 8 and their caption appear below.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. ANOVA and mixed ANOVA results for materials for all three dependent variables.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. ANOVA and mixed ANOVA results for light for all three dependent variables.

Table 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. ANOVA and mixed ANOVA results for representation for all three dependent variables.

A correction has been made to Results Per Independent Variable, Paragraph 1, Page 7. This sentence previously stated: “Our results are organized for each independent variable with subsections for each dependent variable. The ANOVA results are reported using p-value (p), F ratio (F), degrees of freedom (df) and effect size (η2).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“Our results are organized for each independent variable with subsections for each dependent variable. The ANOVA results are reported using p-value (p), F ratio (F), degrees of freedom (df), and effect size (ηg2).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: meta-analysis, natural materials, natural light, sense of belonging, self-efficacy, diversity, environmental efficacy, design interventions

Citation: Altaf B, Bianchi E, Douglas IP, Douglas K, Byers B, Paredes PE, Ardoin NM, Markus HR, Murnane EL, Bencharit LZ, Landay JA and Billington SL (2024) Corrigendum: Use of crowdsourced online surveys to study the impact of architectural and design choices on wellbeing. Front. Sustain. Cities 6:1458100. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2024.1458100

Received: 01 July 2024; Accepted: 08 July 2024;
Published: 23 July 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Thomas Krafft, Maastricht University, Netherlands

Copyright © 2024 Altaf, Bianchi, Douglas, Douglas, Byers, Paredes, Ardoin, Markus, Murnane, Bencharit, Landay and Billington. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Basma Altaf, YmFsdGFmJiN4MDAwNDA7c3RhbmZvcmQuZWR1; Eva Bianchi, ZWJpYW5jaGkmI3gwMDA0MDtzdGFuZm9yZC5lZHU=

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.