Use of Crowdsourced Online Surveys to Study the Impact of Architectural and Design Choices on Wellbeing
CORRECTION article
Corrigendum: Use of Crowdsourced Online Surveys to Study the Impact of Architectural and Design Choices on Wellbeing
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 3 Graduate School of Education and the Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 4 Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 5 School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
- 6 Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, United States
- 7 Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Keywords: Meta-analysis, Natural materials, natural light, sense of belonging, self-efficacy, diversity, environmental efficacy, design interventions
Received: 01 Jul 2024; Accepted: 08 Jul 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Altaf, Bianchi, Douglas, Douglas, Byers, Paredes, Ardoin, Markus, Murnane, Bencharit, Landay and Billington. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Basma Altaf, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Eva Bianchi, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.