- 1Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- 2Department of Atomic Physics, Institute of Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
Single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride have been extensively studied recently. Although unambiguous identification of the emitters is still under intense research, carbon-related defects are believed to play a vital role for the emitter producing zero-phonon lines in the range of 1.6–2.2 eV. In this study, we systematically investigate two configurations of carbon-vacancy defects, VNCB and CNVB, by means of density functional theory calculations. We calculated the reaction barrier energies from one defect to the other to determine relative stability. We find that the barrier energies are charge dependent, and CNVB could easily transform to VNCB in neutral- and positive-charge states while it is stable when negatively charged. Formation energy calculations show that the VNCB is the dominant defect over CNVB. However, neither VNCB nor CNVB has suitable fluorescence spectra that could reproduce the observed ones. Our results indicate that the origin of the 1.6-to-2.2-eV emitters should be other carbon-related configurations.
Introduction
Point defects as emerging single-photon emitters (SPEs) in two-dimensional (2D) hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) have been intensively studied for possible applications in quantum sensing, computing, and nanophotonics (Tran et al., 2016a; Bourrellier et al., 2016; Tran et al., 2016b; Bommer and Becher, 2019; Gottscholl et al., 2020; Hayee et al., 2020; Chejanovsky et al., 2021; Mendelson et al., 2021). The wide band gap (∼6 eV) and small spin-orbital coupling of hBN manifest as the ideal host to accommodate color centers in a wide region of emission wavelength. The spatial confinement and dielectric screening of 2D defects enable them to show desirable properties, for example, bright luminescence, ease of manipulation, tunable emission through strain (Grosso et al., 2017; Hayee et al., 2020; Mendelson et al., 2020), and electric fields (Noh et al., 2018), motivating researchers to investigate the underlying physical and chemical nature of the structures in detail. However, direct mapping or characterization of the defects in experiment is still a challenge. This might be partially related to the various defect types and unintentional impurities during hBN sample fabrication and post-processing.
Photoluminescence data reveal that there are strong emission bands in the ultraviolet region with zero-phonon-line (ZPL) energy at 4.1 eV (Museur et al., 2008; Du et al., 2015; Bourrellier et al., 2016; Vuong et al., 2016) and in the visible region from 1.6 to 2.2 eV (Tran et al., 2016a; Tran et al., 2016b; Gottscholl et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Sajid et al., 2020; Chejanovsky et al., 2021; Mendelson et al., 2021). Based on this, many kinds of point defects have been proposed and analyzed theoretically through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Several of them could match the experimental result well, such as the boron vacancy (VB) (Abdi et al., 2018; Ivády et al., 2020; Reimers et al., 2020), nitrogen vacancy (VN) (Sajid et al., 2018), and Stone–Wales defect (Wang et al., 2016; Hamdi et al., 2020). VB has been identified experimentally (Jin et al., 2009; Kianinia et al., 2020; Gottscholl et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021), and single spins of other defects could be coherently manipulated (Chejanovsky et al., 2021; Stern et al., 2022). In addition, defect complexes and impurities deliberately incorporated during synthesis or ion implantation could also serve as potential candidates (Sajid et al., 2018; Weston et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019; Gottscholl et al., 2020; Chejanovsky et al., 2021; Mendelson et al., 2021). Among them, carbon impurity in hBN has been extensively considered and investigated. A previous study indicated that the recombination from CN as a donor–acceptor pair with VN donor (Du et al., 2015) should not be related to 4.1-eV emission line due to the deep donor level of VN, whereas the CB might be a possible source with charge transition level (0/+) at 3.71 eV (Weston et al., 2018). Later, carbon dimer CNCB was also associated to this emission with a calculated ZPL at 4.3 eV (Mackoit-Sinkevičienė et al., 2019; Li S. et al., 2022). For the visible emission, both VNCB and CNVB are considered depending on their charge states and spin multiplicity. Our study already revealed that the positively charged VNCB(+) has ZPL about 1.5 eV which could be classified to the so called “Group-2” SPE (Abdi et al., 2018). In the triplet electronic configuration of its neutral-charge state, the two defects have ZPL optical transitions at 1.58 and 1.54 eV, respectively (Sajid et al., 2018). A recent study has indicated that the quartet state of the negatively charged CNVB(−) is the origin of the SPEs in carbon-doped hBN (Mendelson et al., 2021).
The robust emission features from carbon defects in hBN samples grown with different techniques and environments indicate that they come from very stable configurations. However, considering the fact that the carbon atom in VNCB and CNVB structures can migrate easily under external perturbation, it is necessary to investigate the relative stability and transformation of the two defects in detail. Formation energy and energy barrier calculation can help to identify the possible structures. The experimentally observed ZPL emission is about 1.6–2.2 eV with the Huang–Rhys factor less than 2. Here, we use these criteria to examine the possibility of VNCB and CNVB as single-photon emitter candidates. In this study, we employ plane-wave supercell DFT calculations to study the energetic and electronic properties of VNCB and CNVB at different charge states and spin multiplicities. We find that the charge states influence the relative stability of the two proposed defects. Although the ZPL energy of CNVB(−) with quartet spin multiplicity is in the experimental range of interest, the calculated formation energy and charge transition level (CTL) indicate that the quartet state is not stable. Our results imply that the charge states of defects can dramatically affect their relative stability and provide further evidence for the identification of quantum emitters in the visible region.
Methods
We performed the spin-polarized DFT calculation within the Kohn–Sham scheme as implemented in the VASP code (Kresse and Furthmüller, 1996a,b). Standard projector augmented wave (PAW) formalism (Blöchl, 1994; Kresse and Joubert, 1999) is used to separate the valence electrons from the nuclei. The convergence threshold is 0.01 eV/Å for force acting on each atom, and energy cutoff for the expansion of the plane-wave basis set is 450 eV. The screened hybrid density functional of Heyd, Scuseria, and Ernzerhof (HSE) (Heyd et al., 2003) is used to calculate the electronic structure and localize bound states. In this approach, we could mix part of non-local Hartree–Fock exchange with the generalized gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) with fraction α. α = 0.32 can reproduce the experimental band gap about 6 eV. We embedded the carbon defects in a
The total HR factor is defined as the number of an effective phonon participating in the optical transition which is a key parameter of the absorption and fluorescence spectra. The total HR factor can be readily calculated within the Franck–Condon approximation which assumes that the vibrational modes in the ground and excited states are identical. The associated phonon overlap spectral function can be derived from the overlap between the phonon modes in the electronic ground and excited states (Gali et al., 2009; Alkauskas et al., 2014).
Results
The ground state electronic structures are calculated for VNCB and CNVB in −1, 0, and +1 charged states with the high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states included. Previous results about the spin multiplicity of the ground state varied with the applied calculation methods (Sajid et al., 2018; Mendelson et al., 2021). For neutral VNCB(0), Cheng et al. (2017) predicted a triplet ground state; however, further comprehensive calculations indicated that the 1A1 singlet is the most favorable one (Reimers et al., 2018). Our calculation shows that the singlet (LS) state of VNCB(0) has lower energy considering the symmetry reduction caused by the pseudo-Jahn–Teller (JT) distortion in the singlet state, while it does not occur in the triplet state. The Cs symmetry configuration is lower in energy by 1.87 eV over that of C2v symmetry configuration. In the following calculation, we remove the symmetry constrain and investigate the electronic structure. We find that the C2v symmetry is the most stable one in the positive charge state regardless of the spin multiplicity, and VNCB(+) prefers the low-spin doublet (LS). Meanwhile, VNCB(−) exhibits the doublet state with Cs symmetry.
For the CNVB defect (n-CNVB in this study), the triplet state is predicted to have lower energy than singlet for CNVB(0) with transition energy in experimental value (Sajid et al., 2018). However, a recent report indicates that this configuration suffers from multiple low-energy minima, and none of them have significant oscillator strength (Mendelson et al., 2021). Notably, we find that the CNVB could form a Stone–Wales-like (sw-CNVB) configuration, as shown in Figure 1, which could have lower formation energy. The multireference character still exists here which is manifested as the unrestricted spin-polarized calculation which yields different energy for spin-up and spin-down channels. We speculate that this phenomenon is due to the spin contamination from the triplet ground state, and indeed, the calculated energy of the singlet is almost identical to that of the triplet. Although these states are not spin eigenstates, the unrestricted DFT orbitals provide more realistic total energies. Except for the HSs of CNVB(−), other electronic states prefer the sw-CNVB configuration. In the following discussion, the most stable configuration is always discussed for CNVB defects in the context. LSs always have lower energy, whereas the CCSD methods pointed out that the HS quartet for CNVB(−) could be the ground state (Mendelson et al., 2021). This controversy motivated us to further investigate the relative stability of carbon impurity in these two defects.
FIGURE 1. Schematic view of carbon-vacancy complexes in hBN. The carbon atom can migrate to the antisite-vacancy configuration. Gray-, green-, and brown-colored balls represent nitrogen, boron, and carbon atoms, respectively. The usual CNVB considered before is denoted as n-CNVB.
The energy-level diagrams for the two defects are shown in Figure 2. VNCB(−) at both HS and LS states do not have empty localized states; therefore, only defect-to-conduction band (CB) excitation occurs which results in a relatively dim emission. The experimental observed bright luminescence should come from defect states in the fundamental band gap, and neither of the vertical transition energies is in line with the experimental PL energies. The VNCB(0) HS state with C2v symmetry has been studied (Sajid and Thygesen, 2020); the defect demonstrates suitable ZPL energy and 1.5 HR factor. However, the HR factor of the more stable LS state in Cs is 7.25, much larger than the experimental value at 1.45. The ZPL of VNCB(+) LS is 1.51 eV (Abdi et al., 2018), which agrees relatively well with the experimental data for the Group-2 emitters. Despite that, the corresponding HR factor is about 24, so we can also disregard it as a good candidate for the observed visible emitters. CNVB(−) with both HS and LS states have defect-to-defect transitions. The singlet CNVB(0) has ZPL of 1.98 eV, and we believe this value is still in the range of interest even taking into account the possible error due to the multireference character of the ground state; however, the HR factor is 8.17. There are no occupied defect states in the gap for CNVB(+), and the allowed transition is between valence band maximum and defect states which should result in, again, a relatively dim optical transition.
FIGURE 2. Energy-level diagram of VNCB (A–F) and CNVB (G–L) with different charge states and spin multiplicities. The filled and empty arrows indicate the occupied and unoccupied defect states in the spin-up and spin-down channels. Resonant defect levels below valence band maximum are not shown here. The dash lines represent the allowed optical transition in the visible wavelength region. We use the most stable configurations at every charge and spin states. Here, the CNVB(−2) and HSs of CNVB(−) have n-CNVB configuration, and the others are calculated with sw-CNVB.
We summarized the calculated lowest vertical excitation energies in Table 1. For defects in the negative-charge state, the CNVB(−) with the HS state is the only possible candidate for the bright visible emitters, and the defects in other charge states have either too small transition energy or large phonon side band. The calculated ZPL is 1.89 eV which is close to that obtained in the flake model (Mendelson et al., 2021).
TABLE 1. The lowest vertical transition energy for two defects in hBN. The energy unit is eV. The simulated annealing temperature (temp.) is also listed as obtained from the calculated barrier energies (see text). For CNVB defect, except for the CNVB(−) HSs, other charge states have lower total energy with sw-CNVB configuration. The ΔEdiff indicates energy difference between these two configurations and defined as ΔEdiff = E (n-CNVB)-E (sw-CNVB).
The defect formation energies Ef are calculated to determine the charge stability with the following equation,
where
FIGURE 3. Formation energies of VNCB (black) and CNVB (red) as a function of the Fermi level. The slope of line segment corresponds to the charge state. The solid and dash lines indicate the LS and HS state, respectively. Crossing of the lines denote the charge transition level. Here, the CNVB(−2) and HSs of CNVB(−) have n-CNVB configuration, and the others are calculated with sw-CNVB.
Next, we calculated the defect migration with the climbing-image nudged-elastic-band method (Henkelman et al., 2000; Henkelman and Jónsson, 2000) as shown in Figure 4. The n-CNVB and sw-CNVB are both considered here. The carbon atom can migrate between boron site and nitrogen site, and this transition rate Γ can be simply expressed as (Weston et al., 2018),
where Eb is the reaction barrier energy, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, and Γ0 is typical phonon frequency in hBN which is about 1014s−1 (Geick et al., 1966). The calculated T can be regarded as the annealing temperature at which the defect becomes mobile as listed in Table 1. Usually, the temperature is estimated when the jump rate Γ is 1/s (Janotti and Van de Walle, 2007). Above this temperature, the reaction barrier can be passed to reach an equilibrium point. In the negative-charge state, the reaction barrier energies for LSs and HSs are 0.98 and 1.96 eV, respectively, for carbon migration from boron site to nitrogen site. The large barrier energies indicate that the carbon atom cannot jump from one site to another; therefore, the two defects could exist simultaneously. The annealing temperature are 353 and 705 K; therefore, VNCB would transform into CNVB if the sample is grown or annealed above these temperatures. However, the barrier energies are quite small in the neutral- and positive-charge states. The barrier energies are generally less than 0.6 eV, especially for LSs in the neutral state, manifesting the carbon that can move freely from nitrogen site to boron site. The calculated annealing temperature is lower than room temperature; hence, the VNCB defect will dominate in these two charge states and the CNVB can only be stabilized through low-temperature irradiation.
FIGURE 4. Reaction barrier for the carbon atom from initial-state VNCB to final-state CNVB in different charge states. Transitions from VNCB to n-CNVB (A–F) and from VNCB to sw-CNVB(G–K) are shown here. The red arrow indicates the reaction barrier Eb. The HSs of CNVB does not have sw-CNVB configuration.
The reaction barrier energies and migration paths depend on the charge state. We tentatively associate the low stability of CNVB(0) and CNVB(+) to the unoccupied localized states in the gap. Filling these defect levels by electrons could stabilize the defect.
Discussion
We calculated the formation energies and the barrier energy of transformation of carbon-vacancy complexes depending on the symmetry and spin multiplicities. We note that the geometry distortions from the planar structure was found for certain carbon-vacancy complexes as the common Jahn–Teller distortion effect where the atoms farther from the core of the defect structure remain in the sheet of hBN layer. This is different from recently proposed geometry containing dramatically out-of-plane warping calculated by CAM-B3LYP DFT functional (Mendelson et al., 2021). This warping might be induced by the hydrogen termination of the model or the freezing of atoms during optimization. In addition, the large-scale distortion might yield the opposite result. In our model, the relaxation energy of HS CNVB(−) is 0.16 eV and the HR factor is 2.2, which are close to the experimental data (Mendelson et al., 2021). However, the formation energy difference between the HS and LS for n-CNVB(−) is 0.4 eV, where the LS configuration exhibits C2v symmetry. Our NEB calculation shows there is no barrier for n-CNVB to transform into sw-CNVB at LSs for three charge states which indicates that the n-CNVB might not exist at all. Recent work indicates that n-CNVB is dynamically unstable and it quickly relaxes to VNCB defect (Ortigoza and Stolbov, 2022). This is consistent with our present data for the neutral-charge state. We show here that sw-CNVB occurs in the other charge states too; thus, this behavior is independent of the position of the Fermi level of hBN.
Similar to VB (Gottscholl et al., 2020), hyperfine interaction-related features may be a unique fingerprint of the CNVB(−) defect observed by electron spin resonance techniques. Recently, an electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) center has been observed in hBN (Toledo and Krambrock, 2020). The experimental data clearly show splitting pattern of five peaks with relative intensities of 1:2:3:2:1. This is due to the hyperfine coupling between one electron spin and two equivalent nitrogen nuclear spin of I = 1; therefore, the EPR center has been tentatively associated with the spin doublet of n-CNVB(−) defect (Toledo and Krambrock, 2020). Although our calculations indicate that n-CNVB(−) does not exist in hBN, we still simulated its EPR spectrum after calculation of the hyperfine tensors of the defect (see Table 2). Indeed, the simulated EPR spectrum of n-CNVB(−) agrees with the experimental one (Toledo and Krambrock, 2020) (Table 2). We note that the hyperfine signatures of the HSs configuration significantly differ. The stable sw-CNVB(−) has very different spin density distributions with localization on two boron ions; thus, its EPR spectrum significantly deviates from that of the observed EPR center. However, n-CNVB(−) is not a stable structure; therefore, we conclude that it cannot account for the EPR center as tentatively proposed by Toledo and Krambrock (2020), despite the agreement between the simulated and observed hyperfine related features in the EPR spectra.
We found that the most stable form of the carbon-vacancy complex in hBN is VNCB; thus, we plot the simulated EPR spectrum for the paramagnetic VNCB(+) in Figure 5B which may occur in hBN. The EPR spectrum shows seven peaks due to two neighboring boron atoms (I = 3/2 for 11B). Further experimental data are needed to confirm the existence of this kind of defect.
FIGURE 5. Simulated EPR spectrum of defects considered. (A) Experimental data are (Toledo and Krambrock, 2020) recorded at 550 °C to clearly show the line splitting. sw-CNVB has relatively small hyperfine coupling so there is no line splitting. The experimental spectrum is shifted 4 mT toward left to match simulation result. (B) EPR spectrum of VNCB(+).
We note that there is a metastable triplet state for VNCB(0). The triplet state may be accessed by optical pumping of the system from the singlet ground state to the singlet excited state followed by an intersystem crossing from the excited singlet state toward the metastable triplet state. However, the large singlet-triplet energy gap makes this process inefficient; thus, we do not consider the triplet of VNCB(0) to be observed by photo-EPR studies.
Summary and conclusions
In this study, we performed density functional theory calculations on the carbon-vacancy complexes in hBN. The analyzed relative stability of these complexes could reveal the origin of the single-photon emitters observed in experiments in the visible wavelength region. sw-CNVB is always more stable than n-CNVB, and n-CNVB transforms into sw-CNVB without any barrier in three charge states. Hence, previously reported n-CNVB is not the origin of visible SPEs in hBN. sw-CNVB is metastable and can transform into VNCB with some barrier energies depending on the charge states. In addition, neither VNCB nor CNVB is a potential candidate for the SPEs associated with the carbon impurities. The formation energies for VNCB and CNVB complexes imply that these complexes cannot account for the experiments claiming that the number of C-B bond is larger than that of the C-N bond in carbon-contaminated hBN (Mendelson et al., 2021). Further investigation is needed for finding the microscopic origin of SPEs associated with the carbon impurities. Recent studies proposed the C2CN configuration (Auburger and Gali, 2021; Li K. et al., 2022; Golami et al., 2022), of which optical properties well reproduce the experimental data. We also found that the recently reported EPR center (Toledo and Krambrock, 2020) is not associated with the unstable VNCB defect. Further investigation is needed to identify this EPR center in hBN. We provide the EPR spectrum for the most stable carbon-vacancy complex in hBN that might be found in future EPR studies of carbon contaminated hBN layers.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
AG acknowledges the Hungarian NKFIH grant No. KKP129866 of the National Excellence Program of Quantum-coherent materials project and the support for the Quantum Information National Laboratory from the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abdi, M., Chou, J.-P., Gali, A., and Plenio, M. B. (2018). Color centers in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers: A group theory and ab initio analysis. ACS Photonics 5, 1967–1976. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01442
Alkauskas, A., Buckley, B. B., Awschalom, D. D., and Van de Walle, C. G. (2014). First-principles theory of the luminescence lineshape for the triplet transition in diamond nv centres. New J. Phys. 16, 073026. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/073026
Auburger, P., and Gali, A. (2021). Towards ab initio identification of paramagnetic substitutional carbon defects in hexagonal boron nitride acting as quantum bits. Phys. Rev. B 104, 075410. doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.075410
Blöchl, P. E. (1994). Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979. doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953
Bommer, A., and Becher, C. (2019). New insights into nonclassical light emission from defects in multi-layer hexagonal boron nitride. Nanophotonics 8, 2041–2048. doi:10.1515/nanoph-2019-0123
Bourrellier, R., Meuret, S., Tararan, A., Stéphan, O., Kociak, M., Tizei, L. H., et al. (2016). Bright uv single photon emission at point defects in h-bn. Nano Lett. 16, 4317–4321. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01368
Chejanovsky, N., Mukherjee, A., Geng, J., Chen, Y.-C., Kim, Y., Denisenko, A., et al. (2021). Single-spin resonance in a van der waals embedded paramagnetic defect. Nat. Mat. 20, 1079–1084. doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00979-4
Cheng, G., Zhang, Y., Yan, L., Huang, H., Huang, Q., Song, Y., et al. (2017). A paramagnetic neutral cbvn center in hexagonal boron nitride monolayer for spin qubit application. Comput. Mater. Sci. 129, 247–251. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.032
Du, X., Li, J., Lin, J., and Jiang, H. (2015). The origin of deep-level impurity transitions in hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 021110. doi:10.1063/1.4905908
Freysoldt, C., and Neugebauer, J. (2018). First-principles calculations for charged defects at surfaces, interfaces, and two-dimensional materials in the presence of electric fields. Phys. Rev. B 97, 205425. doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205425
Gali, A., Janzén, E., Deák, P., Kresse, G., and Kaxiras, E. (2009). Theory of spin-conserving excitation of theN−V−Center in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 186404. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.186404
Geick, R., Perry, C., and Rupprecht, G. (1966). Normal modes in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. 146, 543–547. doi:10.1103/physrev.146.543
Golami, O., Sharman, K., Ghobadi, R., Wein, S. C., Zadeh-Haghighi, H., da Rocha, C. G., et al. (2022). Ab initio and group theoretical study of properties of a carbon trimer defect in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 105, 184101. doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.184101
Gottscholl, A., Diez, M., Soltamov, V., Kasper, C., Sperlich, A., Kianinia, M., et al. (2021). Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf3630. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf3630
Gottscholl, A., Kianinia, M., Soltamov, V., Orlinskii, S., Mamin, G., Bradac, C., et al. (2020). Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature. Nat. Mat. 19, 540–545. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0619-6
Grosso, G., Moon, H., Lienhard, B., Ali, S., Efetov, D. K., Furchi, M. M., et al. (2017). Tunable and high-purity room temperature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 8, 705–708. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00810-2
Hamdi, H., Thiering, G., Bodrog, Z., Ivády, V., and Gali, A. (2020). Stone–wales defects in hexagonal boron nitride as ultraviolet emitters. npj Comput. Mat. 6, 178–187. doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00451-y
Hayee, F., Yu, L., Zhang, J. L., Ciccarino, C. J., Nguyen, M., Marshall, A. F., et al. (2020). Revealing multiple classes of stable quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with correlated optical and electron microscopy. Nat. Mat. 19, 534–539. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0616-9
Henkelman, G., and Jónsson, H. (2000). Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985. doi:10.1063/1.1323224
Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P., and Jónsson, H. (2000). A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904. doi:10.1063/1.1329672
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E., and Ernzerhof, M. (2003). Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215. doi:10.1063/1.1564060
Ivády, V., Barcza, G., Thiering, G., Li, S., Hamdi, H., Chou, J.-P., et al. (2020). Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride. npj Comput. Mat. 6, 41–46. doi:10.1038/s41524-020-0305-x
Janotti, A., and Van de Walle, C. G. (2007). Native point defects in zno. Phys. Rev. B 76, 165202. doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.165202
Jin, C., Lin, F., Suenaga, K., and Iijima, S. (2009). Fabrication of a freestanding boron nitride single layer and its defect assignments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 195505. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.195505
Kianinia, M., White, S., Froch, J. E., Bradac, C., and Aharonovich, I. (2020). Generation of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Photonics 7, 2147–2152. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00614
Kresse, G., and Furthmüller, J. (1996a). Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50. doi:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
Kresse, G., and Furthmüller, J. (1996b). Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186. doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169
Kresse, G., and Joubert, D. (1999). From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775. doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758
Li, K., Smart, T. J., and Ping, Y. (2022a). Carbon trimer as a 2 ev single-photon emitter candidate in hexagonal boron nitride: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. Mat. 6, L042201. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.l042201
Li, S., Chou, J.-P., Hu, A., Plenio, M. B., Udvarhelyi, P., Thiering, G., et al. (2020). Giant shift upon strain on the fluorescence spectrum of vnnb color centers in h-bn. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 85–87. doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00312-y
Li, S., Pershin, A., Thiering, G., Udvarhelyi, P., and Gali, A. (2022b). Ultraviolet quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride from carbon clusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 3150–3157. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00665
Liu, W., Li, Z.-P., Yang, Y.-Z., Yu, S., Meng, Y., Wang, Z.-A., et al. (2021). Rabi oscillation of vb- spin in hexagonal boron nitride. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11220.
Maciaszek, M., Razinkovas, L., and Alkauskas, A. (2022). Thermodynamics of carbon point defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Mat. 6, 014005. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.014005
Mackoit-Sinkevičienė, M., Maciaszek, M., Van de Walle, C. G., and Alkauskas, A. (2019). Carbon dimer defect as a source of the 4.1 ev luminescence in hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 212101. doi:10.1063/1.5124153
Mendelson, N., Chugh, D., Reimers, J. R., Cheng, T. S., Gottscholl, A., Long, H., et al. (2021). Identifying carbon as the source of visible single-photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mat. 20, 321–328. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00850-y
Mendelson, N., Doherty, M., Toth, M., Aharonovich, I., and Tran, T. T. (2020). Strain-induced modification of the optical characteristics of quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. Adv. Mat. 32, 1908316. doi:10.1002/adma.201908316
Museur, L., Feldbach, E., and Kanaev, A. (2008). Defect-related photoluminescence of hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 78, 155204. doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.155204
Noh, G., Choi, D., Kim, J.-H., Im, D.-G., Kim, Y.-H., Seo, H., et al. (2018). Stark tuning of single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 18, 4710–4715. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01030
Ortigoza, M. A., and Stolbov, S. (2022). Thermodynamic stability and optical properties of c-doping-induced defects in hexagonal boron nitride as potential single-photon emitters. Phys. Rev. B 105, 165306. doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.165306
Reimers, J. R., Sajid, A., Kobayashi, R., and Ford, M. J. (2018). Understanding and calibrating density-functional-theory calculations describing the energy and spectroscopy of defect sites in hexagonal boron nitride. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 1602–1613. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01072
Reimers, J. R., Shen, J., Kianinia, M., Bradac, C., Aharonovich, I., Ford, M. J., et al. (2020). Photoluminescence, photophysics, and photochemistry of the VB− defect in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 102, 144105. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.144105
Sajid, A., Ford, M. J., and Reimers, J. R. (2020). Single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride: A review of progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 044501. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab6310
Sajid, A., Reimers, J. R., and Ford, M. J. (2018). Defect states in hexagonal boron nitride: Assignments of observed properties and prediction of properties relevant to quantum computation. Phys. Rev. B 97, 064101. doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.064101
Sajid, A., and Thygesen, K. S. (2020). Vncb defect as source of single photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride. 2D Mat. 7, 031007. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ab8f61
Stern, H. L., Gu, Q., Jarman, J., Eizagirre Barker, S., Mendelson, N., Chugh, D., et al. (2022). Room-temperature optically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 13, 618–619. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28169-z
Stoll, S., and Schweiger, A. (2006). Easyspin, a comprehensive software package for spectral simulation and analysis in epr. J. magnetic Reson. 178, 42–55. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.013
Toledo, J., and Krambrock, K. (2020). Identification and thermal stability of point defects in neutron-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride (h-bn). J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 54, 065303. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abc37c
Tran, T. T., Bray, K., Ford, M. J., Toth, M., and Aharonovich, I. (2016a). Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 37–41. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.242
Tran, T. T., Elbadawi, C., Totonjian, D., Lobo, C. J., Grosso, G., Moon, H., et al. (2016b). Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 10, 7331–7338. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03602
Vuong, T., Cassabois, G., Valvin, P., Ouerghi, A., Chassagneux, Y., Voisin, C., et al. (2016). Phonon-photon mapping in a color center in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 097402. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.097402
Wang, R., Yang, J., Wu, X., and Wang, S. (2016). Local charge states in hexagonal boron nitride with stone–wales defects. Nanoscale 8, 8210–8219. doi:10.1039/c5nr09099g
Weston, L., Wickramaratne, D., Mackoit, M., Alkauskas, A., and Van de Walle, C. (2018). Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 97, 214104. doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.214104
Keywords: hexagonal boron nitride, single-photon emission, color center, quantum information, first principles calculations
Citation: Li S and Gali A (2022) Bistable carbon-vacancy defects in h-BN. Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 1:1007756. doi: 10.3389/frqst.2022.1007756
Received: 30 July 2022; Accepted: 15 September 2022;
Published: 30 September 2022.
Edited by:
Takeshi Ohshima, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, JapanReviewed by:
Yu-ichiro Matsushita, Tokyo Institute of Technology, JapanHosung Seo, Ajou University, South Korea
Copyright © 2022 Li and Gali. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Adam Gali, Z2FsaS5hZGFtQHdpZ25lci5odQ==