Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Robot. AI, 10 October 2022
Sec. Biomedical Robotics
This article is part of the Research Topic Hot Topic: Reducing Operating Times and Complication Rates Through Robot-Assisted Surgery View all 6 articles

Editorial: Hot topic: Reducing operating times and complication rates through robot-assisted surgery

  • 1IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
  • 2University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy
  • 3New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States
  • 4University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 5Université Claude Bernard-Lyon1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
  • 6Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

1 Introduction

Robotics is playing more and more an important role in medicine and surgery. The importance of the integration of robotic technologies in the medical field has only been amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent requirement for socially-distanced care and teleoperated medical assistance. Many recent developments in related fields, including, but not limited to, Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning, soft and continuum robotics, and teleoperation, are enabling robot-assisted surgery to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of surgical operations while reducing invasiveness and potential complications.

A crucial question when considering robot-assisted medical intervention is whether the robot system is as effective, or even more so, than a human surgeon. Key indicators for this effectiveness include, but are not limited to, operating time and complication rate. This research topic aimed to build on the existing developments in robot-assisted surgery by exploring the role of robot systems in reducing operating times and complication rates, investigating the occurrences, causes and outcomes of surgical complications, and discussing how the robotics industry can address these issues for the future.

2 Contributions

This issue includes five contributions that address robot-assisted surgery from different perspectives, aimed at enhancing surgical performance with novel solutions for automatic endoscope guidance (Gruijthuijsen et al.), pre-operative planning (Lambrechts et al.), classification of clinical profiles (Barile et al.), robot base positioning (Sundaram et al.), and minimally-invasive ultrasound scanning (Marahrens et al.).

Gruijthuijsen et al. focus on bi-manual surgical operations, which usually require a second surgeon to maneuver an endoscope and provide visual feedback to the operating surgeon. While robotic endoscope holders have been proposed, existing prototypes impose an additional cognitive load on the now solo surgeon, hindering their clinical acceptance. Conversely, Gruijthuijsen et al. proposes a novel approach that combines tooltip localization with surgical tool segmentation and visual servoing providing synergistic interaction between surgeons and robotic endoscope holders. The system is validated with a bi-manual surgery case study.

Lambrechts et al. propose an AI-driven tool to improve surgeon and patient specific default preoperative plans for knee arthroplasty. As generic preoperative plans require frequent time-consuming changes, a predictive method is shown to reduce by almost 40% the average number of corrections required to adapt a generic plan to a specific patient. This study included over 5,400 operative plans, corrected by 39 surgeons.

Barile et al. use machine learning techniques to discriminate multiple sclerosis clinical profiles through grey matter thickness connectome data. Starting from a dataset of 90 multiple sclerosis patients with four distinct clinical profiles, the proposed pipeline achieves a successful classification in over 70% of the cases using six global graph metrics extracted from the grey matter morphological connectome of the patients. These promising results show the potential and efficiency of the proposed method when compared to complex MRI techniques.

Sundaram et al. aim at improving operation efficiency by optimizing the base location of surgical robots. The proposed method, based on robot capability maps, identifies the optimal positioning of a surgical robot by considering not only robot kinematics but also environmental constraints such as available access ports (e.g., for laparoscopy). This algorithm reduces setup time while improving the setup itself, thus increasing the acceptance of robot-assisted surgery by surgeons and clinical personnel.

Marahrens et al. address robotic ultrasound scanning invasiveness. Autonomous ultrasound scanning has been researched for over 2 decades, but minimally invasive operations are intrinsically limited by inaccurate force sensing and unreliable kinematics. In this work, these challenges are addressed with an attitude sensor fusion scheme for improved kinematic sensing and a visual deep-earning algorithm to ensure contact between the ultrasonic probe and the target surface.

3 Perspectives

The present collection confirms that the scientific community is actively working on robotics and AI for surgical procedures, thus producing a significant increase in performance and effectiveness of these technologies; in the broader context of healthcare, Robotics and Artificial Intelligence propose a wide range of tools and methods, and further achievements will be granted in the next future by studying proper combinations of such different results, integrating both hardware and software solutions.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

This Research Topic has been realized in collaboration with Alfredo Morales Pinzon of Harvard Medical School, United States.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: surgical robots, minimally-invasive surgery, robot-assisted surgery, complication rates, operating time

Citation: Cafolla D, Calimeri F, Cao H, Russo M, Sappey-Marinier D and Zaffino P (2022) Editorial: Hot topic: Reducing operating times and complication rates through robot-assisted surgery. Front. Robot. AI 9:1046321. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1046321

Received: 16 September 2022; Accepted: 27 September 2022;
Published: 10 October 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Sanja Dogramadzi, The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2022 Cafolla, Calimeri, Cao, Russo, Sappey-Marinier and Zaffino. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Daniele Cafolla, contact@danielecafolla.eu 

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.