Current learning strategies in fire evacuation for seniors and people with disabilities in private seniors’ residences and long-term care homes: a scoping review

Current strategies for teaching evacuation methods in private seniors’ residences (PSR) and long-term care (LTCH) homes may pose risks to people with disabilities (PWD) and seniors' physical and psychological health. This study aimed to address the following questions: (1) Which are the current fire evacuation learning strategies used with PWD or seniors? (2) What are the barriers and facilitators for PWD and seniors' during fire evacuation and learning strategies in PSR and LTCH? (3) What is the existing equipment that could be used with PWD seniors?. A scoping review of grey and scientific literature was done in six databases and Google scholar. Additional information was found on Québec government websites. This review identified 13 scientific papers and 22 documents. Twenty barriers (personal = 9, environmental = 11), and 14 facilitators (personal = 4, environmental = 10) were extracted. The current fire evacuation learning strategies currently used can be grouped into three categories: drills; training; promotion of a fire safety plan. Six types of evacuation equipment were found; however, their use has been scarcely documented. Safety for seniors during fire evacuation is still an important issue to be improved. Increasing awareness and creating new practices and tools that consider the strengths and difficulties of seniors seems to be a promising avenue for improving evacuation.

1 Introduction

Fortunately, most people will never be affected by residential fires, however for those who are, these fires can be devastating and even deadly. Residential fires are even more dangerous to human life when vulnerability becomes a common characteristic among people living in the building, such as seniors, i.e., adults over the age of 65. Indeed, in Canada, between 2014 and 2017, 40% of people who died in a residential fire were seniors and they were 2.5× more at risk than adults (1). In the United States, a 2017 study mentions that 32% of the dead during residential fires were seniors, while they represent only 13% of the population (2). Few statistics are available in Europe on the number of fire-related deaths, but the European Fire Safety Alliance (2018) (3) mentions that the seniors are among the most vulnerable, along with people with disabilities (PWD). Private seniors' residences (PSR) and long-term care home (LTCH) are very often occupied by people who have difficulty circulating and going down the stairs. Moreover, even within the normal decline in cognition and loss of some senses linked to aging, learning the right things to do in the event of a fire, as well as the evacuation itself, becomes difficult very quickly (4).

On 23 January 2014, at Isle-Verte, Québec, Canada, a seniors' residence burned to the ground, killing 32 people (5). This tragedy shows that seniors are difficult to evacuate during a fire and has also led to new regulations in Québec, such as the mandatory addition of sprinklers. However, additional measures should be put in place to ensure the safety of this population. Indeed, according to Yves Desjardins, president of the Regroupement québécois des résidences privées pour aînés (RQRA) and Cyrille Delâge, coroner on the Isle-Verte fire investigation, the addition of sprinklers alone would not be enough to ensure the safety of residents (6). Optimising the execution of a “structured evacuation”, i.e., the individual evacuation of residents in a structured and safe manner, would be the best method to preserve lives (6, 7), but the learning strategies currently used by firefighters is mainly based on evacuation drills (4, 8–11). In 2015, a survey conducted by the RQRA reported that injuries are frequent during these drills and therefore recommended the creation of alternative learning methods (12). Moreover, the drills procedure currently used in PSR and LTCH are not necessarily adapted to their capacity and living environment (4, 11), making it necessary to improve those protocols.

Thus, it is necessary to review what is currently being done in terms of learning strategies for seniors elsewhere, in order to better identify the practices to put in place. In addition, highlighting the barriers and facilitators encountered during fire evacuation and while learning fire evacuation protocols will help to create new learning strategies that consider the disabilities, strength and the realities of seniors and their caregivers. Therefore: (1) Which are the current fire evacuation learning strategies used with PWD or seniors? (2) What are the barriers and facilitators for PWD and seniors' during fire evacuation and learning strategies in PSR and LTCH? (3) What is the existing equipment that could be used with PWD or seniors?

2 Methods

Two scoping reviews have been realised, following the steps of Arksey and O'Malley (13), one with the scientific literature and one with the grey literature using the Prisma guideline (14). A scoping study is justified here since it aims to map rapidly the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available, especially where an area is complex or has not been reviewed comprehensively before (15). Furthermore, it is necessary here to search the grey literature, as the subject of this study have a practical perspective.

Find the relevant studies, through the usual means. The scientific scoping review was realised the 26th of June 2020 to assess the current practices in terms of evacuation of seniors in case of fire in private seniors' residences and long-term care home. Supplementary Table S1, shows the four different databases used for this research: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycNET and Web of Science. The basic keywords used in those databases were separated in four concepts (Seniors, Location of residence, Fire, Evacuation) and additional terms have been used in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycNET, according to their respective thesaurus, to improve the research. Additional articles found in the bibliography have also been considered. The scoping review with grey literature was realised using 4 different ways as presented in Table 1. To begin with, some information was given by experts and partners who work in the field of fire evacuation for seniors. Then, a research using the advanced search of Google Scholar was done the 21st of September 2021 in English and in French. The keywords were based on the terms used in the previous scientific review and identified by trial and error. For the English research, the search equation used was “evacuation fire senior residence” while in French, it was its translation “incendie évacuation aînés residence”. Using the principle of data saturation, the first 5 pages of Google, with ten documents each, in the two languages were kept. Furthermore, specific searches in Québec's and Canada's governmental websites were done using Google (better search engine then most governmental websites). More specifically, a search was also done in the Integrated Health and Social Services Center of Chaudière-Appalaches (CA) website. Indeed, the region of CA in the province of Québec, Canada, is currently implementing a number of experimental measures for the evacuation of seniors. Finally, a specific search was conducted on Orbit, EspaceNet and Google Scholar to generate ideas for concepts that are currently used or could be used to evacuate seniors or PWD making them more difficult to evacuate. The research equations were refined using the same process as for the main research question.

Table 1

Table 1. Data sources, date and research equation for grey literature related to evacuation in case of fire in private seniors’ residences and long-term care home—English and French.

Select the studies that are relevant to the question(s). For both scoping reviews, to ensure a solid internal validity, the articles were sorted out independently by two of the co-authors using the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented in Table 2 and according to the Prisma guideline (14). Figure 1 shows the steps of PRISMA. For the scientific revue, 503 articles were found, but 41 where duplicate. Of the remaining 462, a first selection was made by analysing the title and abstract to keep 87 of them. A second selection was done after reading the full text and reduced the number of articles to six. However, three articles found in the scientific revue where add to the grey literature revue. For the grey literature, 144 articles were found with five duplicates. A first selection was done by looking at the title and an overview of the text. Of the 139, 66 were kept and two more articles were added from bibliography. The second selection was done by analysing the documents using the five criteria of the AACODS checklist (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date and Significance) (16). In this checklist, all articles that had a “No” on the significance category, were rejected, as well as articles that had more than two “No” in the other categories. For the articles that had only one, it was looked at carefully to decide if it was accepted or not. Of the 66 documents to be rated, 19 were included in the grey literature revue and seven where add to the scientific review. Thus, in total, 13 articles were kept for the scientific review and 22 for the grey literature review. Throughout the process, if any disagreements between the two readers occurred, a consensus was reached following a discussion between the two. If necessary, a third co-author was brought in to settle the issue.

Table 2

Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for scientific and grey literature.

Figure 1

Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart illustrating the different phases of the selection process of relevant studies on fire evacuation in private seniors’ residences and long-term care home for the PWD and seniors and the associated numbers.

Chart the data, i.e., the information on and from the relevant studies. Data extraction was done by two co-authors and transcribed in Supplementary Table S4 (scientific literature), 5 (grey literature) and 6 (equipment) and can be found in the Supplementary Material. The first papers were looked at by each co-author and compared together to ensure the same understanding of the table and the important information to gather. The results column in the Supplementary Table S4 and S5 was created using the Person-Environment-Occupation model (17), since it is a model commonly used by occupational therapists, of whom two authors are. For the purpose of this paper, the term occupation is referred as the action of practicing/learning evacuation techniques as well as performing the evacuation itself. It allows for a focus on the individual by highlighting the interactions between these three concepts and thus makes it easier to identify the barriers and facilitators present during an evacuation and during the application of the learning strategies. In the case of patents, a description of those and of their utility was add in Supplementary Table S6.

3 Results

Collate, summarize and report the results. For scientific results in Supplementary Table S4, 13 studies are reported. All research designs are exploratory, since there were three surveys, two case studies, one observational study, three qualitative research, one retrospective study report, one pre-post study design and one repeated measure randomized block experimental design. Samples varied between nine and 416. For results in Supplementary Table S5, the grey literature where mostly guides (four government guides and one evidence-informed recommendations summary), documents describing the situation of seniors in case of firing (one review of the situation, one final research report, one doctoral dissertation, one summary of government statistics) and one policy perspective. For results in Supplementary Table S6, the 12 documents are patents. Results will be summarized regarding the three research questions.

3.1 Existing fire evacuation learning strategies used with PWD and seniors

There is currently a gap between perceived and real preparedness as shown by the difference between the disaster plans and the result of the drills, specifically, in the case of dementia-specific awareness (18). Despite this fact, several methods are used to limit the impact of a fire, both in terms of prevention and to facilitate evacuation.

3.1.1 Drills

Evacuation drills are currently used but are also a debated method. Although it seems to help seniors to learn evacuation methods and safety tricks, few of them participate in it (18, 19). Moreover, there are risks to their physical and psychological health due to the stress involved in practising evacuation (18, 20). On the other hand, verbal or written instructions alone are also not enough, hence the importance of drills (21). To be effective, these exercises should be done at least once or twice a year (22, 23). At some of those, it was noted that there were increased numbers of people being advised by fire marshals during the practice and it was often rare that residents were evacuated to the end or to the nearest safe area. Indeed, they were often all brought to the same place, even if another area was closer (24). Another method of carrying out these practices is to include only staff. This helps to educate them on how to respond to a fire situation and how to deal with the residents (25). This type of training should be carried out minimally when there is a new employee and especially when there is a big change in personnel (23).

3.1.2 Training

Training beside drills should be given to residents and care-providers (21, 25–29). It should include a diversity of resources (26) and use various senses (21) to make learning easier for them. For example, a two-day training program to train staff, including a teacher's guide, a DVD of instruction and a CD containing other useful resources seem to work to give care-providers a better understanding of the disaster plan and of the best approach in case of fire. Inclusion of specific methods on training adult learners is also beneficial (27). In terms of content, those trainings should explain the four stages of evacuation (detection of the alarm/fire, understanding and undertake the evacuation, moving, relocating) included in the safety plan to help the staff and the residents understand the particularity of each stage and the procedures to follow (28). Furthermore, those instructions should be placed on each floor of the residence (28). Indeed, easy-to-access information is a good way to spread the information (29). Care-providers should also have training on how to respond and guide person with Alzheimer's disease (29) and how to help mitigate psychological distress and anxiety (29). It is recommended for people with dementia to give them calm and proper instructions, lots of reassurance and close supervision. It is important to have a good identification of all the residents and to include specific training to deal with behavioural symptoms (18). In addition, a suggested evacuation method to teach is to first assist residents near the fire and then evacuate the other systematically (23). It is also recommended to match the evacuation speed at a level that minimises risks for seniors (30). Furthermore, education on evacuation methods should no longer be only provided by first-responding agencies, but also by other partners to improve the dissemination of information (29, 31). An example would be to use the care-providers, who are known by the residents, to teach (26).

3.1.3 Promotion of a good fire safety plan

It is important to promote a good fire safety plan to help fire prevention and safe evacuation. This helps improve knowledge, role and responsibilities of everybody, good coordination of actions and promotes a rapid response at the start of the fire (30). For example, in Québec, a revision of the plan is recommended at least annually (25) while evaluating the mandatory measures in place in PSR are the responsibility of the municipalities (32).

3.1.4 Research

Research should be promoted to support the development of a framework to measure the levels of preparedness of care institutions and to use the existing evidence to support planning and regulation in terms of fire prevention (29).

3.2 Barriers and facilitators for PWD and seniors' during fire evacuation and learning strategies in PSR and LTCH?

3.2.1 Barriers for seniors' fire evacuation in private seniors' residences and long-term care home

3.2.1.1 Personal factors

Several personal factors may influence the performance in an evacuation. To begin with, many seniors will hesitate before exiting at the sound of the alarm and need additional guidance or encouragement before exiting (24, 33). Thus, some of them, lose several minutes, putting their lives at risk (33). Secondly, in terms of preparation for a disaster, motivation would not be influenced by experience or taught knowledge. Indeed, the uncertainty that it will happen as well as the probability of dying beforehand demotivates seniors (26). In addition, the anxiety associated with disasters, like a fire, can be so important that some may be too afraid to think about it, and thus, do not prepare themselves accordingly (26). Many also feel that it is not their responsibility to be prepared (26). Lack of participation in fire drills and unfamiliarity with the building fire plan are personal actions that directly increase the chances of death or injury in an actual fire (19). Furthermore, a perceived safety net provides a false sense of security and prevent them from fully understanding the risk of injury or death due to fire (19). The language barrier and the wide range of educational levels can also affect the implementation of a training programme for staff (27).

Several physical limitations can make evacuation more difficult. First, people with impaired mobility may be at risk of falling, especially on stairs, given that lifts are unavailable during a fire (21, 28). Others may be unable to manipulate certain handles or doors on the escape route, particularly due to diseases such as arthritis (21, 28). Respiratory problems may also make evacuation more difficult by increasing the demand for oxygen due to the physical effort required and the level of stress. When fire and smoke are present, symptoms of respiratory dysfunction and distress are also exacerbated (21). People with hearing problems may not hear alarms or additional information given during the evacuation (19, 21, 28, 30). Those with visual problems may have difficulty orienting themselves and reading maps and signs, especially due to lack of lighting and smoke (21, 30). Furthermore, in emergency situations, bedridden or severely disabled residents may be totally dependent on the staff, leaving those with milder disabilities unattended (19).

Cognitive problems as well as dementia can also affect evacuation. Indeed, these individuals have special needs during an evacuation and are more vulnerable, due to difficulties in concentration (18, 30), comprehension (28, 30), memory (21, 30), following instructions (18) and due to behavioural problems, such as anxiety, distress, wandering or agitation (18, 21). In addition, high anxiety conditions make memory issues worse (30). Sleep inertia can also occur for seniors and reduce physical and cognitive performance for at least 30 min after awakening (21). Medications can also play an important role in the cognitive ability of seniors, including decreasing their reaction time and alertness.

3.2.1.2 Environment factors

At the environmental level, it has also been found that most fires in private residences in Québec start in residential areas, mainly in the kitchen and bedroom (34). Several environmental barriers can hinder drills or the evacuation itself. First, at the institutional level, the lack of time to organise drills (27), the lack of resources in residences (35) and the shortage of staff, mainly at night (19, 24), are the three main difficulties identified. A lack of regulation, mostly in relation to people with disabilities, is also present (36). Secondly, the lack of preparation and materials is also problematic. Indeed, ineffective manuals, not having cards to indicate empty rooms and locked doors without an accessible key, are all elements that can hinder an evacuation for employees. Poor lighting at the evacuation plans can make it difficult for residents to evacuate (20). Thirdly, on an architectural level, the type of construction often used for residences common areas, for example, large rooms (cafeteria, playroom, lounge, chapel, etc.) and long, wide corridors, favour the spread of fire and smoke (19, 37). The lack of sprinklers in many residences (19, 28, 35) is also problematic, as is the absence of an alarm system linked to the fire department, preventing a rapid response from the firefighters (28). Moreover, buildings without firewalls prevent the effective implementation of horizontal evacuations, which is easier to achieve than vertical evacuations (28). Finally, clutter, grouping, lack of handrails and visibility, are all factors that can hinder an efficient and safe evacuation (28).

3.2.2 Facilitators for seniors' fire evacuation in private seniors' residences and long-term care home

3.2.2.1 Personal factors

In terms of personal factors, it is recommended that managers ensure that their employees and replacements have received fire safety training (22, 38) and that residents are informed about fire safety and good behaviour (22). This ensures that everyone knows their role and avoids confusion, thus limiting the danger to residents and employees (38). Good communication between staff, firefighters and the incident coordinator is also desirable to facilitate evacuation (38). In addition, in the event of a disaster, it was found that older residents are willing to follow the instructions of government and municipal response agencies (fire and police departments, military), especially among those with previous disaster experience (31). According to Proulx (33), 89% of people in a fire practice followed instructions from the voice communication system and 64% of them found the information useful. From the same study, 81% said they would like to obtain more information on fire safety.

3.2.2.2 Environment factors

It was found that in most fires between 2016 and 2019 in private seniors' residences in Québec, the smoke alarms and the alarm system worked well (34). In addition, even though private seniors' residences often had a less developed security system than public ones, people felt safe because of the presence of staff (32). Several environmental facilitators can play a role in evacuation. First, a good communication system (21, 23, 38), with a clear and defined ordering hierarchy (21, 37) greatly assists the police and staff in evacuating residents. Secondly, an audible alarm system and voice communication system are effective means, especially when coupled together, to warn residents, even those with hearing problems (33). The alarm system can also include a strobe light to warn people in a deeper sleep (e.g., medication) or with hearing problems (21). In addition, the fire service should be alerted first by the alarm system rather than by employee action (23). Thirdly, safety can be greatly increased by high standards of construction (fire-resisting construction and compartmentation, incorporating sub compartments with a small number of bedrooms, fire-rated, bedroom doors with smoke seals and automatic closure on alarm). This protects residents and makes evacuation easier for employees (23, 37). Sprinklers and free-swinging automatic door closers also reduce the spread of fire and smoke (23, 37), while the presence of handrails and emergency lightning in exit door and corridor facilitate the movement of people with reduced mobility (21). Fourth, a clear evacuation plan (21, 22, 32) and maps showing a well-marked and lit path is very important to facilitate evacuation as it allows a better understanding of the path to be followed by the residents (21, 30).

3.3 Existing equipment or invention

Several inventions have been tested over the last decade to help evacuate in emergency situations people with or without disabilities. Twelve patents have been found and can be regroups into six types of equipment. Some of them are similar to a chair, making it easier to get down the stairs than a manual descent, promoting ideal positioning of the carer and improving comfort for the resident. This type of chair can be motorized or not (39–41). About these types of chairs, a focus group with firefighters also pointed out that they preferred devices with a longer extension at ground level in order to be able to cover three steps at a time, thus offering better stability to the device (40). There are also different types of boards to facilitate the transport of residents, some of which can be slid along the floor by a single carer (42) while others must be lifted by two people (43, 44). An apparatus can also be installed on beds to help transport bedridden people (45). Others allow residents to be lowered by means of a lift system, which can be either inside (46, 47) or outside the building (48, 49), or by using a zipline (50) or a tube on the side of the building with a padded sleeping bag (51).

4 Discussion

This scoping study has answered the first research question since it identified three kind of learning strategies (drills; training; and the promotion of a good fire safety plan) The second research question has highlighted nine personal barriers and 11 environmental barriers, as well as four personal facilitators and ten environmental facilitators for seniors' fire evacuation strategies in PSR and LCT homes. The last research question pointed out six types of equipment/invention through 12 patents: chairs, boards, apparatus for beds transportation, lift system, zipline and tube. Given those results, the discussion will be presented in two main parts: prevention and learning strategies regarding what to do in case of fire; and tools uses to help evacuate PWD and seniors.

4.1 Recommendations for prevention and learning strategies

One of the major points that emerges is it seems that there is a crying need for awareness-raising at several levels. Indeed, on an individual level, it is necessary to ensure that seniors understand the implications of not being prepared in case of fire: they are not only putting their lives at risk, but also the lives of those who will come to try to help them. At the community and institutional level, we need to ensure that residences have the resources to train their staff and residents in fire prevention and evacuation methods. Indeed, it seems there is also a need to continue to improve the learning strategies currently used. One way to do this would be to not only rely on drills, but also to add training and practices provided by the community. An example of such training could be a peer training program (52) to involve more seniors in the process and to build on social reinforcement as an awareness raising method. Considering the difficulties of the residents, especially at the cognitive level, during drills and training programs it is essential to ensure that they understand and integrate the lessons. For example, short learning segments could make it easier to keep their attention and concentration, thus maybe facilitating their understanding of the subject (30). To ensure that as many people as possible participate, it could be possible to implement these training capsules through already organised group or social activities.

Given the complexity of the problem, a multi-approach is necessary to help both residents and staff to learn. Including different senses and ways of learning would give a more complete experience and help build on each person's strengths. Evacuation drills remain an essential learning factor for residents and staff, but on the other hand, they can be harmful to the seniors, both physically and psychologically. It would therefore be interesting to develop alternatives methods of giving them practical training (53). For example, the creation of a serious games (54), using technology as a medium, could simulate a fire situation in a realistic way and offer a learning opportunity with less risk for the seniors. In addition, this type of practice could also be developed for staff. Indeed, conducting a drill is time consuming and difficult to organise at high rate of occurrence (10, 11). Although this has not been tested yet, a serious game simulating drills could be a venue to explore, by provide training for new staff and serve as a reminder to older staff, potentially reducing the need for frequent actual real drills.

Another area that needs improvement in terms of prevention is the environment. The residences must have the resources to create the safest possible environment and have the necessary equipment to evacuate quickly, efficiently and in a manner that is safe for all. It is important to ensure the best architectural layout and equipment to facilitate communication between firefighters, employees, and residents. Many alarm systems can be used to alert residents in different directions, but it is also important to ensure that these systems do not incapacitate others. High volume and strobe lights can be disruptive to some people, especially those with sensory problems such as autism spectrum disorders or intellectual disabilities (55–57). This seem relevant to be taken into consideration mainly because the longevity of these two populations has increased significantly (58, 59), and they may find themselves more often in residences. It is also important to ensure that systems to slow the spread of fire are not harmful to residents. Indeed, due to their physical and sensory difficulties, some tools can become a nuisance. For example, it is also possible that sprinklers may create steam, which could lead to poor visibility and make breathing more difficult for those with respiratory problems (6).

4.2 Recommendations for tools used during evacuation

In order to help in the evacuation of the seniors in the event of a fire, 6 different solutions (chairs, boards, equipment for beds transportation, lift system, zipline and tube) were found in this review. However, their use has been little documented in the literature. One possible explanation for this is the cost associated with these equipment's. Indeed, many of them may be expensive and residences cannot afford them. Thus, it would be beneficial to continue to work on the development of evacuation tools/solutions for the seniors, taking into consideration not only the cost, but also the physical difficulties, such as decreased overall strength, grip and breathing problems, and cognitive difficulties, such as anxiety, dementia and comprehension problems. These prototypes should also take into consideration the level of learning required for use, the usability and inclusiveness of the equipment for various clienteles and staff who will manipulate them, as well as the environment in which it is used, both in terms of the type of building and the weather conditions if it is outdoors. We can especially think of the impact of winter on the usability of the equipment in the case of northern countries. To ensure that theses inventions are used, partnerships could be formed with governments, community organizations along with public security and firefighters' departments to facilitate the dissemination of those evacuation methods in private seniors' residences and long-term care home. Some of these partnerships could be used to help finance the cost of the equipment, while others could be used to help raise awareness of the need for proper equipment and how to use them.

4.3 Limitations of the study

This scoping review only sample articles from certain literature databases and journals, along with a limited number of pages from Google Scholar, and English and French-only documents or articles, which may compromise to some extent, the external validity of the review.

5 Conclusion

This review helped to identify ideas of what is considered as current learning strategies when it comes to teach fire evacuation in homes for the seniors. It has also highlighted that a multitude of barriers and facilitators may affect the learning process of the protocol, but also the evacuation itself. There is still a long way to go to ensure that the learning strategies used and evacuations themselves are safe for all. Increasing awareness is a pivotal first step and increasing the amount of scientific literature on the subject will help to achieve this goal. The development of new methods that are more adapted to the experiences of seniors, such as a formation that considers their strengths and difficulties and that also focuses on their lifestyle to increase their adherence, might be a way to make it easier for seniors to learn the evacuation guidelines. In order to ensure that the formation is as effective as possible in transferring knowledge, it would be wise to include seniors in the creation of the course. Research, development, and dissemination of new evacuation tools would also be essential to enable safe and effective evacuation.

However, little information was found on the content of the training courses, what staff and residents should be taught and what specific guidelines should be followed in the event of a fire. Further research on this subject could therefore enable better dissemination of the guidelines and prevention methods to be followed and thus prevent deaths among a vulnerable and growing population.

Author contributions

WT: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GB: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CV: Formal Analysis, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IF: Writing – review & editing. JR: Writing – review & editing. EM: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This research was possible thanks to the funding of the research programme “Action concertée—Programme de recherche-action pour un vieillissement actif de la population du Québec” (Concerted action—research programme for an active ageing population in Québec) du “Fonds the recherche du Québec-Société et Culture (Québec Research Funds- Society and Culture) (grant numbers 2020-0QAA-283778).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2024.1305180/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Garis L, Biantoro C. Fire Risk in Senior Population: Analysis of Canadian Fire Incidents. Centre for Public Safety and Criminal Justice Research (2019). Available online at: https://cjr.ufv.ca/fire-risk-in-senior-population-analysis-of-canadian-fire-incidents/ (accessed December 12, 2021).

2. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Study Suggests Frailty Makes Seniors More Likely to Die in Home Fires (2017). Available online at: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2017/08/nist-study-suggests-frailty-makes-seniors-more-likely-die-home-fires (accessed December 12, 2021).

3. European Fire Safety Alliance. EU-wide data on residential fires (2018). Available online at: https://www.europeanfiresafetyalliance.org/our-focus/statistics/ (accessed December 12, 2021).

4. Rousseau MH. Des exercices d'évacuation difficiles à mener dans des résidences pour aînés, Ici Radio-Canada (2016). Available online at: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/780617/exercice-evacuation-residence-personne-agee (accessed December 12, 2021).

5. Delâge C. Rapport du commissaire aux incendies du Québec, Me Cyrille Delâge, agissant aux présentes en sa qualité de coroner relativement au décès d'Angéline Guichard survenu à la suite d'un incendie au 25, rue du Quai, à L'Isle-Verte (Québec) G0l 1K0, le 23 janvier 2014, le present rapport étant de plus versé dans les dossiers des personnes également décédées dans les mêmes circonstancces et mentionnées ci-apès. Retrieved from District de Rivière-du-Loup (2015). Available online at: https://www.coroner.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/Coroners/Rapport_d_enquete_-_L_Isle-Verte.pdf (accessed December 12, 2021).

6. Desjardins Y, Desjardins A, Dion M-C, Marchand D. Services aux membres du RQRA. Un nouveau volet formation et perfectionnement prend forme. L'Adresse (2016). 27.

7. Wilson L. Evacuation of People with Disability & Emergent Limitations: Considerations for Safer Buildings & Efficient Evacuations (2016). Available online at: http://www.caloes.ca.gov/AccessFunctionalNeedsSite/Documents/evacuation-of-pwd-and-emergent-limitations-2nd-edn-by-lee-wilson.pdf (accessed mars 21, 2018).

8. Senay C. Des exercices d'incendie non sécuritaires dans des résidences pour aînés, Ici Radio-Canada (2016). Available online at: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/780419/exercices-incendie-residences-aines-levis-rapports (Consulté le 15 janvier 2019).

9. Robillard JP. Résidences pour aînés: la pertinence des exercices d'évacuation remise en question, Ici Radio-Canada (2016). Available online at: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/780531/securite-incendie-exercices-evacuation-evacuation-aines-personne-agee-regie-pompiers-batiment-Québec (accessed December 12, 2021).

10. Folk L, Gales J, Gwynne SMV, Kinsey M. Design for seniors egress in fire situations. London: Interflam (2016). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1853.5924

11. Gales J, Kinsey M, Folk L. Evacuation Simulation of the Seniors: Data Collection and Model Validation (Paper No. 100). Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics Conference, China (2016). Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309388786 (accessed December 12, 2021).

12. Regroupement québécois des résidences pour aînés -RQRA. Résultats du sondage: Les exercices d'évacuation dans les résidences privées pour aînés: État de la situation (2015). Available online at: http://www.rqra.qc.ca/client_file/upload/bibliotheque/20151007SondageEvacuation_Final.pdf (accessed December 12, 2021).

13. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. (2005) 8(1):19–32. ISSN 1364-5579. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. (2009) 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dijkers M. Published in KT Update (Vol. 4, No. 1—December 2015). An e-newsletter from the Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research What is a Scoping Review? (2015). Available online at: http://ktdrr.org/products/update/v4n1 (accessed December 12, 2021).

16. Tyndall J. The AACODS Checklist is Designed to Enable Evaluation and Critical Appraisal of Grey Literature. Adelaide, South Australia: Flinders University (2010). Available online at: https://dspace.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2328/3326/AACODS_Checklist.pdf

17. Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. (1996) 63(1):9–23. doi: 10.1177/000841749606300103

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Schnitker L, Fielding E, MacAndrew M, Beattie E, Lie D, FitzGerald G. A national survey of aged care facility managers’ views of preparedness for natural disasters relevant to residents with dementia. Australas J Ageing. (2019) 38(3):182–9. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Jaslow D, Ufberg J, Yoon R, McQueen C, Zecher D, Jakubowski G. Fire safety knowledge and practices among residents of an assisted living facility. Prehosp Disaster Med. (2005) 20(2):134–8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X00002314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Turner SJ. Preparation for a fire disaster in a long-term care facility. A staff development perspective. J Nurs Staff Dev. (1991) 7(3):134–7. PMID: 2061721.2061721

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Carrara M. (2010). Community-based nursing plan to help seniors safely evacuate from an independent living facility in an emergency. (doctoral dissertation).

22. Gouvernement du Québec. Sécurité incendie dans les résidences accueillant des personnes présentant des limitations à l’évacuation (2017). Available online at: https://www.cisssca.com/clients/CISSSCA/Sous-Sites/Prevenir_le_feu/Formation_incendie_GRSI_-d%C3%A9pliant.pdf (accessed September 20, 2021).

23. Purser DA. Fire safety and evacuation implications from behaviours and hazard development in two fatal care home incidents. Fire Mater. (2015) 39(4):430–52. doi: 10.1002/fam.2250

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Folk L, Gonzales K, Gales J, Kinsey M, Carattin E, Young T. Emergency egress for the seniors in care home fire situations. Fire Mater. (2020) 44(4):585–606. doi: 10.1002/fam.2820

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zork F. Nursing home disaster planning and response: a policy perspective. J Gerontol Nurs. (2014) 40(12):16–24. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20141111-02

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Gershon RR, Portacolone E, Nwankwo EM, Zhi Q, Qureshi KA, Raveis VH. Psychosocial influences on disaster preparedness in San Francisco recipients of home care. J Urban Health. (2017) 94(5):606–18. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0104-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. O'Brien C, Selod S, Lamb KV. A national initiative to train long-term care staff for disaster response and recovery. J Public Health Manag Pract. (2009) 15(2):S20–4. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000345981.57422.90

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gouvernement du Québec. Guide pratique: la prévention des incendies et l’évacuation des résidences hébergeant des personnes âgées (2008). Available online at: https://www.cisssca.com/clients/CISSSCA/Sous-Sites/Prevenir_le_feu/GUI_pratique_evacuation_aines_2008.pdf (accessed September 20, 2021).

29. Gilmartin MJ, Spurlock WR, Foster N, Sinha SK. Improving disaster preparedness, response and recovery for older adults. Geriatric Nursing (New York, NY). (2019) 40(4):445–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.07.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Somes J, Donatelli NS. Disaster planning considerations involving the geriatric patient: part 1. J Emerg Nurs. (2012) 38(5):479–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.05.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bonnan-White J. Independent-living senior communities in disaster: self-efficacy and trust in responding agencies. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. (2017) 14:2. doi: 10.1515/jhsem-2016-0064

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ducharme MN. Du logement à l’hébergement: les régulations dans l’aménagement, les immeubles et les services. Les passerelles entre l’État, le marché et l’économie sociale dans les services de logement social et d’hébergement pour les personnes âgées, 52 (2005).

33. Proulx G. Occupant response during a residential highrise fire. Fire Mater. (1999) 23(6):317–23. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199911/12)23:6%3C317::AID-FAM705%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Direction de la sécurité incendie et des télécommunications d’urgence et du Service du développement en sécurité incendie du ministère de la santé public du Québec. Statistiques à propos des incendies au Québec (Document inédit) (2021).

35. Amla AKM. Les conditions de vie des aînés de minorités visibles dans les résidences privées à Montréal. Mémoire de maîtrise en travail social, Université de Sherbrooke. Savoir UdeS (2017). Available online at: https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/10539 (accessed September 20, 2021).

36. OPHQ. L'habitation Évaluation de l'efficacité de la politique gouvernementale À part entière: pour un véritable exercice du droit à l'égalité (2017). Available online at: https://www.ophq.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/centre_documentaire/Versions_accessibles/OPHQ_Rapport_Habitation_EP1_acc.rtf (accessed September 20, 2021).

37. Service de la sécurité incendie. Complément au guide pratique: La prévention des incendies et l’évacuation des résidences hébergeant des personnes âgées, informations destinées aux exploitants (2001). Available online at: https://numerique.banq.qc.ca/patrimoine/details/52327/2098609 (accessed September 20, 2021).

38. Koning SW, Ellerbroek PM, Leenen LP. Indoor fire in a nursing home: evaluation of the medical response to a mass casualty incident based on a standardized protocol. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. (2015) 41(2):167–78. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0446-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Brooks RL. Evacuation chair (US4711487A) (1987). Available online at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4711487 (accessed September 14, 2021).

40. Mehta JP, Lavender SA, Hedman GE, Reichelt PA, Park S, Conrad KM. Evaluating the physical demands on firefighters using track-type stair descent devices to evacuate mobility-limited occupants from high-rise buildings. Appl Ergon. (2015) 46:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Meng Y. Stair-climbing chair equipped with power and convenient to make way (CN203877695U) (2014). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/051678222/publication/CN203877695U?q=pn%3DCN203877695U (accessed September 14, 2021).

42. Kenalty C, Gordon M. Evacuation sled (US2013276227A1) (2013). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/049378749/publication/US2013276227A1?q=pn%3DUS2013276227A1 (accessed September 14, 2021).

43. Cameron J. An evacuation means (AU5046393A) (1994).

44. Walkingshaw NR, Ostrowski SB. Evacuation Sled and Temporary Surge (US2008265557A1) (2008). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/038789212/publication/US2008265557A1?q=pn%3DUS2008265557A1 (accessed September 14, 2021).

45. Howitt K. Emergency Evacuation Apparatus for a Bed-Ridden Person (US20080115283A1) (2004). Available online at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7555793 (accessed September 14, 2021).

46. Seo SY. Emergency Evacuation device (KR20140107877A) (2014). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/051755320/publication/KR20140107877A?q=pn%3DKR20140107877A (accessed September 14, 2021).

47. Napanju. Emergency escape device (WO2011122817A2) (2011). Available online at: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2011122817A2/en (accessed September 14, 2021).

48. Olson JR, Reid BP, Olson RR. Apparatus and Method for the Transfer and Movement of Objects (US2013227789A1) (2013). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/049041987/publication/US2013227789A1?q=pn%3DUS2013227789A1 (accessed September 14, 2021).

49. Park JW. Emergency evacuation device for building (KR101195437B1) (2012). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/046686049/publication/KR101195437B1?q=pn%3DKR101195437B1 (accessed September 14, 2021).

50. Shibukawa W. Carrying Device and Care Facility (JP2003088560A) (2003). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/019109895/publication/JP2003088560A?q=pn%3DJP2003088560A (accessed September 14, 2021).

51. Spiller K. Apparatus for use in an evacuation chute (GB2451129A) (2007). Available online at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/038476674/publication/GB2451129A?q=pn%3DGB2451129A (accessed September 14, 2021).

52. Beaudoin M, Best KL, Routhier F. Influence of peer-based rehabilitation interventions for improving mobility and participation among adults with mobility disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. (2020) 42(13):1785–96. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1537380

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Menzemer LW, Ronchi E, Karsten MM, Gwynne S, Frederiksen J. A scoping review and bibliometric analysis of methods for fire evacuation training in buildings. Fire Saf J. (2023) 136:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103742.

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Mouaheb H, Fahli A, Moussetad M, Eljamali S. The serious game: what educational benefits? Proc Soc Behav Sci. (2012) 46:5502–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.465

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, Cernak SA, Engel-Yeger B, Gal E. A meta-analysis of sensory modulations symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. (2009) 39(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0593-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lundqvist L-O. Prevalence and risk markers of behavior problems among adults with intellectual disabilities: a total population study in Örebro county, Sweden. Res Dev Disabil. (2013) 34(4):1346–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Smith MJ, Sainfort PC. A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. Int J Ind Ergon. (1989) 4(1):67–9. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(89)90051-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Shattuck PT, Wagner M, Narendorf S, Sterzing P, Hensley M. Post-high school service use among young adults with an autism spectrum disorder. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2011) 165(2):141–6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.279

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Cooper S-A, Melville C, Morrison J. People with intellectual disabilities. [Editorial]. Br Colombia J. (2004) 329:414–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.414

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar