BIN1 rs744373 SNP and APOE alleles specifically associate to common diseases

APOE ε4 and BIN1 are the two main genetic risk factors for sporadic Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Among several BIN1 variants, the rs744373 is frequently associated with AD risk by contributing to tau pathology and poor cognitive performance. This study addressed the association of APOE and BIN1 rs744373 to specific characteristics in a Portuguese primary care-based study group, denoted pcb-Cohort. The study included 590 participants from five primary care health centers in the Aveiro district of Portugal. Individuals were evaluated and scored for cognitive and clinical characteristics, and blood samples were collected from the volunteers meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria (N = 505). APOE and BIN1 genotypes were determined, and their association with cognitive characteristics and other diseases that might contribute to cognitive deficits, namely depression, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, osteoarticular diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, was assessed. The diseases attributed to the study group were those previously diagnosed and confirmed by specialists. The results generated through multivariate analysis show that APOE ε4 carriers significantly associated with poorer cognitive performance (OR = 2.527; p = 0.031). Additionally, there was a significant risk of dyslipidemia for APOE ε4 carriers (OR = 1.804; p = 0.036), whereas BIN1 rs744373 risk-allele carriers were at a significantly lower risk of having dyslipidemia (OR = 0.558; p = 0.006). Correlations were evident for respiratory diseases in which APOE ε4 showed a protective tendency (OR = 0.515; p = 0.088), and BIN1 had a significative protective profile (OR = 0.556; p = 0.026). Not of statistical significance, APOE ε2 showed a trend to protect against type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.342; p = 0.093), in contrast BIN1 rs744373 risk-allele carriers were more likely to exhibit the disease (OR = 1.491; p = 0.099). The data here presented clearly show, for the first time, that the two top genetic risk factors for sporadic AD impact a similar group of common diseases, namely dyslipidemia, respiratory diseases, and type 2 diabetes.

Introduction

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the world's most common type of dementia. It is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the impairment of several cognitive functions, namely emotional and social changes, and deficits in memory, attention, concentration and language (Balasa et al., 2011).

Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD) represents nearly 95% of AD cases (Bertram and Tanzi, 2004), affecting individuals aged 65 or older. The scientific community accepts that genes play a crucial role in disease onset and development, thus contributing to LOAD complexity (Bertram and Tanzi, 2004). The gene encoding apolipoprotein E (APOE), located on chromosome 19, has been consistently linked to LOAD, and the ε4 allele is considered the most significant risk factor for this dementia (Bertram and Tanzi, 2012). Decreased amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance (Zlokovic, 2013) and increased Aβ aggregation (Bertram and Tanzi, 2004) were more prevalent in ε4 carriers than in non-carriers. Furthermore, Aβ load and senile plaque accumulation (one of the hallmarks of the disease) strongly correlate to APOE ε4 dosage at autopsy (Rebeck et al., 1993; Schmechel et al., 1993). On the other hand, the ε2 allele has a protective effect against the onset and development of AD (Bertram and Tanzi, 2012).

Over the years, several Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified more than 20 loci linked to LOAD risk (Lambert et al., 2009, 2013). Among these is the Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1), considered the second most significant genetic risk factor for sporadic AD (Kunkle et al., 2019). BIN1 is a gene associated with endocytic pathways. Thus, likely to be involved in amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) metabolism and Aβ production, strengthening the relevance of endocytic mechanisms in AD etiology and progression (Itoh and De Camilli, 2006), alongside phosphorylation-related processes (Gandy et al., 1993). Furthermore, BIN1 has a potential role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton and might interact with microtubule-associated proteins like tau, whose dysregulation can result in neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), another hallmark of AD (Itoh and De Camilli, 2006). The SNP rs744373 is the most commonly reported BIN1 variant conferring AD risk, with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.17–1.19 and a global frequency close to 40% (Antúnez et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2011; Almeida et al., 2018). This variant has been correlated with the rate of cognitive decline and AD progression (Franzmeier et al., 2021), increasing tau loads and contributing to poor cognitive performance and tau-related memory deficits (Franzmeier et al., 2019). Additionally, a study showed an association between BIN1 rs744373 and high levels of total tau and tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 181, measured in CSF samples of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients (Wang et al., 2016).

In addition to genetic factors, other age-related diseases are prevalent among the elderly population and contribute to cognitive decline (Duthie et al., 2011). Epidemiological and molecular studies suggest that common disorders such as depression (DEP) (Novais and Starkstein, 2015), cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cardiovascular risk factors, among them type 2 diabetes (DM), hypertension (HYP) and dyslipidemia (DYS) are associated with increased dementia risk (Tini et al., 2020). Growing evidence also supports an association between cognitive impairment and respiratory diseases (RESP) (Villeneuve et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2015), osteoarticular diseases (OA) (Weber et al., 2019) and gastrointestinal diseases (GID) (Rosa et al., 2017). Inflammation is a crucial mechanism underlying the association between dementia and these age-related disorders (Santiago and Potashkin, 2021). Likewise, cerebrovascular disease is commonly observed in AD patients and also associates with DM, DEP, and DYS (Santiago and Potashkin, 2021). Thus, cerebrovascular damage might be another link between these age-related diseases and dementia.

In the context of other diseases, studies show that APOE increases the risk of DEP (Wang et al., 2019). Consistently, individuals with CVD or other cardiovascular-related risk factors such as HYP and DM are more prone to AD if they carry the APOE ε4 allele (Peila et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2005). Contrastingly, besides AD, BIN1 has not been associated with most of the abovementioned age-related diseases. Two studies evaluated the BIN1 association with DM, but the results are contradictory (Greenbaum et al., 2016; Vacínová et al., 2017). The interplay between other diseases and dementia needs further clarification, and more studies need to address these associations and how APOE and BIN1 might influence these pathologies.

Given the high incidence of dementia worldwide, in which a high percentage is attributed to LOAD cases, it is imperative to readdress the highest AD risk genes in the context of cognitive deficits and other diseases. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the frequency of APOE alleles in a primary care-based group (pcb-Cohort) involving 590 Portuguese participants from five randomly chosen primary health care centers in the Aveiro district of Portugal. To evaluate the cognitive deficits as normal, to moderate or severe, we performed the Clinical Dementia Rate (CDR) on the study population. Likewise, the relevance of the rs744373 variant of BIN1 as a potential risk factor associated with cognitive deficits in this Portuguese population was investigated. Finally, the possible associations of these two risk loci with HYP, DYS, OA, CVD, DEP, GID, DM, and RESP, were addressed in the context of the abovementioned association with dementia.

This study provides insights into population-specific risk factors, reinforcing APOE ε4 as a risk factor to cognitive deficits among the Portuguese population. Although preliminary and requiring further replications, our findings support that the two top genetic risk factors for AD affect similar age-related pathologies that could contribute to dementia.

Materials and methods

Study design

A cross-sectional population-based survey on a primary care-based Portuguese volunteer group of 590 individuals (pcb-Cohort) was carried out as previously described (Rosa et al., 2017). For this study, five primary health care centers, in the Aveiro district of Portugal, were randomly selected. In brief, participants completed a structured interview covering their respective lifestyles, and clinical history was collected. Next, cognitive evaluations and dementia screening tests, namely CDR, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Katz Activities Daily Living (ADL), and Instrumental Activities Daily Living (IADL), were performed on all 590 volunteers.

Clinical data from the study participants, compiled by physicians and health professionals, was accessed via collaboration with the medical staff at all sites and was thoroughly investigated. Clinical data available from clinical records were scored, such as information regarding the presence of other diseases, namely HYP, DYS, OA, CVD, DEP, GID, DM, and RESP. HYP was diagnosed after observing persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg in several temporally distinct measurements. Similarly, DYS was diagnosed by measuring total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides after a 12-h fasting period, with repeated analyses at a minimum interval of 4 weeks. DEP was diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria, in which the individual must have at least five symptoms of either a depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure for 2 weeks. In the present study, CVD included cardio pathologies, cardio arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization or other arterial revascularization procedure, ischemic stroke and peripheral arterial disease. GID comprised dyspepsia, esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, diverticulosis, diverticulitis and anusitis. Finally, RESP included the following chronic pathologies: allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive pathologies, and sarcoidosis. For RESP, pathologies considered acute, self-limited, or infectious, such as tonsillitis and pneumonia, were excluded. All common diseases considered in the present study were scored positive based on the previous diagnosis with confirmation by a specialist in the reference hospital for the Aveiro Region. Common diseases unable to be confirmed were not included when scoring for the prevalence of the different pathologies among the study participants.

A total of 568 volunteers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were processed for APOE allele and BIN1 rs744373 SNP genotyping. Procedures regarding this phase are described below.

Blood collection and genotyping

For each volunteer, blood was collected into 3 tubes for whole blood, serum, and plasma (3+5+5 ml, respectively), according to standard procedures. Samples were immediately aliquoted and frozen at −80°C. Whole blood samples collected in EDTA tubes were available for genotyping of APOE for only 508 individuals (Figure 1). APOE genotyping was performed prior to BIN1. Meanwhile, three samples were no longer biologically available for genotyping (BIN1 population = 505). Therefore, only 505 samples (available for both APOE and BIN1) were considered for the present study.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Study design and workflow. The study involved 590 volunteers who were subjected to a structured interview and cognitive evaluation. Clinical data were also collected, and the diseases of each participant were scored. A total of 568 individuals met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, although it was possible to collect blood from only 508. APOE genotyping was performed before BIN1. Meanwhile, 3 samples were no longer biologically available for genotyping (BIN1 population = 505). Therefore, only 505 samples (available for both APOE and BIN1) were considered for the present study. Data input and subsequent analyses were carried out using SPSS.

APOE and BIN1 genotyping were carried out by direct blood PCR using a modified Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase protocol (Phusion Blood Direct PCR Master Mix; Thermo Fisher Scientific). For APOE, genetic polymorphic regions were amplified using 1–2 μl of blood and the primers APOE-Fw 5'-CGGGCACGGCTGTCCAAGGAG-3' and APOE-Rev 5'-CACGCGGCCCTGTTCCACCAG-3', yielding a fragment of around 300-bp, as previously described (Rosa et al., 2017). The PCR conditions were as follows: 98°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 98°C for 1 s, 64°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 15 s; and a final extension step at 72°C for 1 min. For BIN1 (rs744373), PCR of the polymorphic regions was carried out using 2 μL of whole blood from each patient, 2 × Phusion Blood Direct Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.5 μM gene-specific primer BIN1-forward 5'- AAGACGGAGAGAGGAGGCAT-3' and BIN1-reverse 5'-CCATCTTCTTCTGCTCTCCCA G−3 ′, yielding a fragment of around 767-bp. The PCR conditions were: 98°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 63°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 46 s; and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. Afterwards, PCR products were purified with sodium acetate (3M, pH 5.2), and Sanger sequencing was performed. Results were analyzed to determine the nucleotide polymorphisms and the respective APOE and BIN1 genotypes. For the study design, the number of volunteers genotyped was 505, which is a reasonable sample size given the population density of the Aveiro district (Schulz and Grimes, 2005; Rosa et al., 2017).

Statistical analysis

Analyses of the data collected at each phase were carried out, blind to the data from the other stages, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (Marôco, 2021). Categorical variables were assessed through the examination of frequencies. In contrast, continuous variables were evaluated by the generation of descriptive methods (means, standard deviations) to investigate the differences in the group (CDR, cognitive performance, depression groups, APOE allele carriers, BIN1 G+ carriers vs. normal groups).

Regarding the multivariate analysis, logistic regression was used for the dichotomous dependent variables (risk allele G of BIN1 rs744373 variant and APOE carriers of ε2 or ε4), considering the socio-demographic and cognitive characteristics, as well as the diseases scored for each volunteer. The reference group included non-carriers of the risk allele; that is, for APOE ε4, the reference group was the one that lacked this allele; for APOE ε2, the reference group was the one that did not have this allele; and for BIN1 the reference group was the one that did not have the risk allele G. The Odds Ratio was calculated. This ratio, if >1, indicates a risk factor, and if < 1 indicates a protective factor. In the present study, this methodology was used to identify the risk/protective factors concerning both BIN1 and APOE.

A two-sided statistical test was carried out for each analysis, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. P-values between 0.05 < and < 0.1 were considered a trend.

Results

APOE and BIN1 frequencies in the pcb-Cohort

In the study population, the most predominant APOE haplotype was the ε3ε3, representing 75% of the individuals, followed by ε3ε4 (16.1%) and ε2ε3 (6.1%). It is noteworthy that ε2 and ε4 have opposite effects, but in the pcb-Cohort only 1.4% of the participants had the ε2ε4 haplotype (Figure 2). Similarly, only 1.4% of cases were ε4ε4, being one of the least prevalent haplotypes. As for ε2ε2 haplotype, it was absent in the study population. Regarding BIN1, the most prevalent genotype was the AA (53.2%), followed by AG (41.4%) and the GG genotype, representing only 6.3% of the individuals.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Representation of the genotype and allelic frequencies for APOE and BIN1 in the pcb-Cohort. (A) APOE haplotype in the pcb-Cohort. The most frequent haplotype is ε3ε3, while ε2ε2 individuals are absent. The prevalence of ε4ε4 is 1.4%. ε4 is the risk allele of APOE; being a carrier of the allele confers risk for developing AD. This risk is higher when two ε4 alleles are present. (B) BIN1 genotype in the pcb-Cohort. The most frequent genotype is AA (53.2%), while GG cases are the least frequent (6.3%). G is the risk allele of BIN1 rs744373; being a carrier of the allele confers risk for developing AD. This risk is higher when two G alleles are present. (C) APOE ε2 alleles in the pcb- Cohort. 38 (7.5%) individuals have the ε2 allele of APOE (protective for AD). (D) APOE ε4 alleles in the pcb- Cohort. There are 95 (18.8%) individuals with the ε4 allele of APOE (risk allele for AD). (E) BIN1 G alleles in the pcb-Cohort: 241 (47.7%) of the volunteers of the pcb-Cohort are carriers of the G allele of the BIN1 SNP rs744373 (risk allele for developing AD).

A similar analysis by alleles shows that only 7.5% of the study population had the protective ε2 allele of APOE, while more than twice as many individuals (18.8%) carried the allele that confers risk of developing AD (allele ε4). In turn, the G allele of the BIN rs744373 variant, which confers risk of developing LOAD, was present in almost half of the study population (47.7%).

Socio-demographic and cognitive characteristics of the pcb-Cohort as a function of APOE and BIN1 SNP rs744373

Relevant characteristics, namely socio-demographic and cognitive deficits within the pcb-Cohort and associations with APOE and BIN1 rs744373, were analyzed and are summarized in Table 1. Overall, no significant associations were evident for ε3 carriers (data not shown). In contrast, there is a skewed prevalence for the stratified genotypes among these characteristics, where APOE ε4 carriers associated with cognitive deficits, while APOE ε2 and BIN only associated with age.

TABLE 1

Table 1. APOE and BIN1 allele associations with the social-demographic and cognitive characteristics of the pcb-Cohort.

In the pcb-Cohort, women were more prevalent (70.3%). Our results do not show any significant gender effect associated with either APOE ε4 (p = 0.346), APOE ε2 (p = 0.225), or BIN1 (p = 0.614). Although not significative (p = 0.088), our results also showed a decrease in the mean age between non-carriers (68.1 years) and carriers of the APOE ε2 allele (65.4 years). Moreover, in the age group < 65 years ε2 carriers were more frequent than non-carriers (52.6% vs. 33.2%), while in the age group ≥ 65 years ε2 carriers were less frequent than non-carriers (47.4% vs. 66.8%), reaching statistical significance (p = 0.015). Regarding BIN1, there was a significant decrease (p = 0.034) in the mean age of individuals with the G allele (67.0 years) compared to non-carriers (68.7 years). However, when grouping individuals by age (< 65 years and ≥65 years), there were no significant differences in the frequency of the BIN1 risk allele (p = 0.446).

An association between APOE ε2 and cognitive features of the study population was not observed. In contrast, the frequency of individuals with moderate to severe cognitive deficits based on the CDR scores (CDR ≥ 1) was more significant in ε4 carriers (p = 0.038), and the mean in CDR scores was also significantly higher in carriers (1.8 score) compared to non-carriers (1.1 score). Regarding the GDS scale (GDS ≥ 5), we observed an association between APOE ε4 carriers and high GDS scores (p = 0.037). Additionally, our results showed a higher association trend between the ε4 allele of APOE and ADL (p = 0.083), with an increase in ADL-dependent cases among ε4 carriers. No associations between APOE and neither the MMSE nor the IADL were found.

Regarding BIN1, the frequency of the G risk allele increased in individuals with CDR scores equal to 0.5 (34.1% in non-carriers compared to 40.2% in carriers), contrary to the other two groups (CDR = 0 and CDR ≥ 1). Still, this result was not significant (p = 0.193). Furthermore, no significant associations with the remaining cognitive tests were identified.

Logistic regression of APOE and BIN1 in the Portuguese pcb-Cohort

Regarding socio-demographic characteristics, our results showed no association between age and APOE ε4 or BIN1. Nevertheless, a lower association trend between age and APOE ε2 when comparing non-carriers to carriers (Table 2) was observed. The group of individuals over 65 years old showed 47% reduced odds of having the ε2 allele compared to the younger age group (% of 1–0.53; OR = 0.534; 95% CI 0.256–1.112; p = 0.094).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Logistic regression of APOE and BIN1 alleles in the pcb-Cohort.

As for the cognitive characteristics, our results showed an association between APOE ε4 and cognitive deficits (Table 2). Carriers of the ε4 allele were 2.5 times more likely to have a CDR score above 1 (OR = 2.527; CI 95% = 1.089–5.865; p = 0.031). Likewise, our results showed a tendency for a higher association between depressive states and a positive GDS score among ε4 carriers (OR = 1.649; CI 95% = 0.974–2.791; p = 0.063).

The multivariate analysis of the studied diseases showed results aligned with the bivariate analyses (Supplementary Table 1). DYS was statistically significant among the studied diseases for both APOE ε4 and BIN1. APOE ε4 to carriers were 1.8 times more likely to have DYS (OR = 1.804; CI 95% = 1.040–3.129; p = 0.036) than non-carriers. Likewise, carriers of the BIN1 G allele had a 44% reduced risk of having DYS compared to non-carriers (% of 1–0.56; OR = 0.558; 95% CI 0.367–0.847; p = 0.006).

Our results also showed that carriers of the G allele of BIN1 had a 44% reduced risk of having RESP compared to non-carriers (% of 1–0.56; OR = 0.556; 95% CI 0.331–0.934; p = 0.026). On the contrary, although not reaching statistical significance, there was a 48% reduced risk of having RESP diseases among carriers of the ε4 allele of APOE, compared to non-carriers (% of 1–0.52; OR = 0.515; 95% CI 0.240–1.105; p = 0.088).

DM was another disease showing a trend to be associated with both APOE and BIN1. Despite not reaching statistical significance, individuals with the ε2 allele had a 66% reduced risk of having DM compared to non-carriers (% of 1–0.34; OR = 0.342; 95% CI 0.098–1.195; p = 0.093). Conversely, when comparing carriers of the risk allele G of BIN1 rs744373 to non-carriers, the first showed a higher association trend with a greater risk of having DM (OR = 1.491; CI 95% = 0.928–2.398; p = 0.099).

Interestingly, APOE and BIN1 seem to influence each other. According to the logistic regression, the presence of the APOE ε4 allele significantly increased by 1.7 times the odd of having the G allele of BIN1 rs744373 (p = 0.030) and vice versa (p = 0.029). Moreover, without reaching statistical significance, we also observed a similar trend for a higher association between APOE ε2 and BIN1.

Discussion

Regarding APOE alleles, the results of the present study are consistent with other findings, reporting a higher frequency of the ε3 allele and ε3ε3 haplotype, and a lower frequency of APOE ε2 (Davignon et al., 1988; Mahley, 1988; Farrer et al., 1997; Smith, 2000). Remarkably, we observed a high frequency of the G allele of BIN1 SNP rs744373 in the study population, reinforcing that it is one of the most relevant LOAD risk genes, particularly this variant.

APOE and BIN1 rs744373 and socio-demographic and cognitive characteristics

In the pcb-Cohort, our results show a higher percentage of ε2 carriers in the age group < 65 years and a lower rate in the age group ≥65 years, compared to non-carriers (p = 0.015). Data suggest that younger generations have a higher frequency of this allele than older generations. APOE ε2 has been associated with longevity (Shinohara et al., 2020). However, contrary to our results, previous studies showed higher frequencies of APOE ε2 in elderly individuals and centenarians compared to younger populations (Cauley et al., 1993; Sebastiani et al., 2019). Nevertheless, it is essential to mention that the APOE ε2 variant represents the most recent variant of this risk gene (Fullerton et al., 2000), suggesting that selective pressures contributed to the evolution and global distribution of human APOE alleles over time (Huebbe and Rimbach, 2017). Thus, this preliminary observation may relate to genetic variations of the younger population. Still, more comprehensive studies need to be carried out in this respect, particularly in larger cohorts, to evaluate potential generational effects on allele frequencies. Of note, APOE ε2 is not only a protective gene but might also increase the risk of certain cerebrovascular diseases and neurological disorders (Li et al., 2020), which could also contribute to the reduced frequency of APOE ε2 carriers among ≥65 years old individuals in our study population.

Further, APOE ε4 carriers significantly associated with cognitive deficits (p = 0.038), contrary to ε2 carriers (p = 0.382). In fact, APOE ε4 emerged as a significant risk factor, increasing the susceptibility to develop dementia (OR = 2.527; p = 0.031). This result is in line with previous reports where APOE ε4 was associated with poor cognitive performance even in healthy individuals (Caselli, 2009; Wisdom et al., 2011). Other studies also reported that the ε4 variant increases the risk of developing AD, while the ε2 variant reduces AD risk (Loy et al., 2014). Moreover, in the present study, while executing the CDR test, APOE ε4 carriers presented worse memory performance and other cognitive alterations such as diminished orientation, judgment, and problem-solving skills. This result indicates that the ε4 allele correlates with memory problems and changes in a broader range of cognitive functions, corroborating published data (Yasuno et al., 2012). This conclusion was further strengthened by observing a potential association between the presence of the ε4 allele and ADL-dependent individuals (p = 0.083). Therefore, in the study population, APOE ε4 proved to be a risk factor for the existence of cognitive deficits, contributing to doubling the risk of having a score of CDR >1 (OR = 2.527; p = 0.031), often associated with dementia. Nevertheless, early identification and management of dementia in the primary care setting remain a challenge (Parmar et al., 2014), and dementia is often underdiagnosed by clinicians in primary care centers and underreported by patients and families (Amjad et al., 2018). Due to dementia-related symptoms being considered part of the normal aging process (Schulz and Grimes, 2005), an estimated 50% of primary care patients 65 years or older are not diagnosed with this syndrome (Iliffe et al., 2009). Thus, underdiagnosed dementia might contribute to the doubled risk of CDR≥1 among the APOE ε4 carriers' group, as was observed in this study group.

In our study population, APOE ε4 allele was also associated with GDS (p = 0.037), the test evaluating depression. In the multivariate analysis, we observed a trend showing that ε4 carriers are more likely to have a depressed state (OR = 1.649; p = 0.063). This observation is in line with previous studies (Wang et al., 2019). Reports have suggested that amyloid-associated depression may precede the onset of AD, particularly in APOE ε4 carriers (Sun et al., 2008; Qiu et al., 2016). Moreover, previous research reports that the ε4 allele may increase the likelihood of depression by about 4 times in women (Delano-Wood et al., 2008). In contrast, men do not show an association between DEP and this APOE allele (Delano-Wood et al., 2008). Other studies report no association between depressive states and APOE ε4 carriers (Locke et al., 2013). Thus, more research should be conducted on the interplay between DEP and this risk gene.

Regarding BIN1, in the pcb-Cohort the G risk allele of rs744373 SNP does not seem to be associated with either socio-demographic characteristics or cognitive deficits (Table 1). Thus, we could not replicate Seshadri et al. (2010) results, which showed a significant association between that variant and AD cases. Still, it is crucial to remember that in such an intricate and complex disease as AD, it becomes more challenging to replicate GWAS discoveries due to the heterogeneity of different populations. More studies are required to evaluate the role of this and other BIN1 variants in larger populations with different characteristics, to have a greater insight into the relationship between this risk gene and cognitive deficits that might result in dementia.

APOE and BIN1 rs744373 in the context of other diseases

In the pcb-Cohort, both the ε4 allele of APOE and BIN1 rs744373 are significantly associated with DYS. APOE ε4 allele considerably increased the risk of having DYS (OR = 1.804; p = 0.036). On the contrary, BIN1 rs744374 had a protective profile and is likely to prevent the disease by 50%, compared to non-carriers of the G allele (OR = 0.558; p = 0.006). Several studies have demonstrated associations between the different APOE haplotypes and plasma levels of lipids and lipoproteins (Sing and Davignon, 1985; Boerwinkle and Utermann, 1988; Mooijaart et al., 2006). APOE ε4 carriers usually have increased total cholesterol levels and low density protein (LDL)-cholesterol (Sun et al., 2014). Also, numerous common genetic variants have a combined effect on influencing plasma levels of HDL cholesterol (Spirin et al., 2007). Previous research suggested that higher plasma APOE and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) from early life might preserve cognitive functions in later life, especially in APOE ε4 carriers (Yasuno et al., 2012). A longitudinal study showed that APOE ε4 non-carriers with AD, have cholesterol metabolism dysfunction and functional harm with raised HDL-cholesterol levels, possibly due to lower availability of lipids to neuronal membranes (de Oliveira et al., 2017). Over the years, researchers have explored the interplay between DYS and dementia, however, the role of cholesterol in AD is still debatable. A study reported that protective variants of APOE against risk of AD also slow cognitive decline in patients with dementia, regardless of cholesterol variations, while therapy with lipophilic statins might benefit carriers of specific genetic variants (de Oliveira et al., 2020). The same was observed regarding two other protective variants, particularly among APOE ε4 carriers with AD (De Oliveira et al., 2022). To our knowledge, this is the first time that an association between BIN1 rs744373 and DYS has been reported. Further studies should elucidate the nature of this association and how important it might be for dementia.

Given that APOE ε4 and BIN1 are considered risk factors for AD and that previous studies have shown an association between respiratory diseases such as COPD and dementia (Villeneuve et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2015), one would expect that carriers of these risk variants would be more prone to RESP. Our data indicate a low association trend between APOE genotype and RESP diseases (p = 0.088). However, contrary to what we expected, the ε4 allele might decrease the likelihood of RESP (OR = 0.515). Similarly, BIN1 seems to be a protective factor for RESP as the G allele significantly reduces the risk of having RESP (OR = 0.556; p = 0.026). Further studies should address the mechanism by which APOE ε4 or BIN1 might influence the pathogenesis of RESP.

Our results also support a strong trend of APOE ε2 allele as a protective factor toward DM, with a reduction of type 2 diabetes odds by 66% in carriers of that allele (OR = 0.342; p = 0.093). Diabetic individuals have an increased risk of developing AD (Biessels et al., 2006), thus ε2 carriers may be less prone to both DM and AD. In a primary care setting, the screening and control of type 2 diabetes may aid in dementia prevention. Nevertheless, future studies in larger populations need to validate these observations.

Surprisingly, a higher association trend between the risk allele of BIN1 SNP rs744374 and DM was also detected (p = 0.099). It is important to emphasize that in the present study, while BIN1 showed a protective profile regarding DYS and RESP, in the case of DM, the rs744373 variant seems to be a risk factor (OR = 1.491), which also differs from the results of APOE ε2 (OR = 0.342). A previous study by Vacínová et al. (2017) reported no association between DM and the BIN1 SNP rs744373. Further, a recent study showed that, among ≥65 years old subjects with DM, the rs6733839 variant of BIN1 may contribute to individual changes in episodic memory performance (Greenbaum et al., 2016). Besides DM increasing AD risk by 2-fold (Mayeux and Stern, 2012), it is also a potential changeable risk factor for developing this type of dementia. Therefore, it might be altered or strengthened by other risk factors such as genetic causes (Lindenberger et al., 2008) and influenced by BIN1. Despite these findings, additional large-scale genetic studies in different populations are required to unravel the possible roles of BIN1 in the overlap between the two pathologies. Also, future studies should explore if the coexistence of the rs744373 variant and DM could contribute to cognitive deficits.

Overall, the present study represents an essential step in elucidating genomic contributions to dementia and how LOAD's two top risk genes might be associated with other diseases influencing the onset and development of cognitive impairment. There are, nonetheless, some limitations. First, the small sample size of this study may be underpowered to detect the minor effects of genetic variants. Likewise, since it was beyond this study's scope, we did not address gene-gene or gene-environment interactions, which would be an asset given that cognitive performance is multifactorial. Further, we were not able to detect minor effects/confounding factors.

For these reasons, and as mentioned above, it is imperative to reproduce and validate these results in other cohorts with larger populations and investigate the possible association of other BIN1 polymorphisms with cognitive deficits.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this was the first genetic study addressing the impact on cognitive deficits of both APOE and BIN1 rs744373 on several diseases in a Portuguese population selected from a primary health care setting. Thus, it represents an important step in elucidating genomic contributions to cognitive deficits, offering some insights into population-specific risk factors.

As expected, APOE ε4 was a significant risk factor for cognitive deficits in the pcb-Cohort. Although rs744373 (BIN1) was not associated with an increased risk of cognitive deficits in this Portuguese population, we did not address other SNPs. Future studies in the Portuguese population should evaluate other BIN1 variants in the context of cognitive deficits.

The present study showed a strong association between the two top genetic AD risk factors (APOE and BIN1) and other age-related pathologies such as DM, RESP, and DYS. Nevertheless, it is imperative to study their presence individually and profiles of coexisting diseases and risk genes to find new therapies and ways to prevent dementia, including AD.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee for Health of the Central Regional Administration of Coimbra (CES da ARS Centro, protocol No. 012804-04.04.2012), Portuguese National Committee for Data Protection (Authorization N° 369/2012). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

OCS, AH, and JW obtained funding. MC, LC, IR, OCS, and AH conceptualized and designed the study. IR collected cognitive and clinical data. LC, IR, and AH collected and processed blood samples. MC and LC performed the genotyping procedures. MC and IR analyzed data. MC, IR, AH, and OCS wrote and revised the paper. JW revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by PdC no: 1811255, SAICT-45-2021-02 Portugal2020, FEDER, and also supported by PTDC/DTPPIC/5587/2014 and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016904, Instituto de Biomedicina (iBiMED)-UIDB/04501/2020 and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007628, the Fundação para a Ciĉncia e Tecnologia (FCT) of the Ministério da Educação e Ciência, COMPETE program, the QREN and the European Union (Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional), by the Integrated Programme of SR&TD “pAGE” (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000003), co-funded by Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund and by MEDISIS – CENTRO-01-0246-FEDER-000018, Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union. MC was supported by the FCT through an individual Ph.D. scholarship SFRH/BD/132995/2017.

Acknowledgments

We thank the volunteers and their families, as well as to all the health professionals, involved in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frdem.2022.1001113/full#supplementary-material

References

Almeida, J. F. F., dos Santos, L. R., Trancozo, M., de Paula, F. (2018). Updated meta-analysis of BIN1, CR1, MS4A6A, CLU, and ABCA7 variants in Alzheimer's disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 64, 471–477. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1045-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amjad, H., Roth, D. L., Sheehan, O. C., Lyketsos, C. G., Wolff, J. L., Samus, Q. M. (2018). Underdiagnosis of dementia: an observational study of patterns in diagnosis and awareness in us older adults. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 33, 1131–1139. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4377-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Antúnez, C., Boada, M., González-Pérez, A., Gayán, J., Ramírez-Lorca, R., Marín, J., et al. (2011). The membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A (MS4A) gene cluster contains a common variant associated with Alzheimer's disease. Genome Med. 3, 33. doi: 10.1186/gm249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balasa, M., Gelpi, E., Antonell, A., Rey, M. J., Sanchez-Valle, R., Molinuevo, J. L., et al. (2011). Clinical features and APOE genotype of pathologically proven early-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurology 76, 1720–1725. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821a44dd

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertram, L., Tanzi, R. E. (2004). The current status of Alzheimer's disease genetics: what do we tell the patients? Pharmacol. Res. 50, 385–396. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2003.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertram, L., Tanzi, R. E. (2012). The genetics of Alzheimer's disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 107, 79–100. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385883-2.00008-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biessels, G. J., Staekenborg, S., Brunner, E., Brayne, C., Scheltens, P. (2006). Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 5, 64–74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70284-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boerwinkle, E., Utermann, G. (1988). Simultaneous effects of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism on apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein B, and cholesterol metabolism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 42, 104–112.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Caselli, R. J. (2009). Age-related memory decline and apolipoprotein E e4. Discov. Med. 8, 47–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Cauley, J. A., Eichner, J. E., Ilyas Kamboh, M., Ferrell, R. E., Kuller, L. H. (1993). Apo E allele frequencies in younger (age 42–50) vs older (age 65–90) women. Genet. Epidemiol. 10, 27–34. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370100104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davignon, J., Gregg, R. E., Sing, C. F. (1988). Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 8, 1–21. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.8.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Oliveira, F. F., Bertolucci, P. H. F., Chen, E. S., Smith, M. C. (2022). Pharmacogenetic analyses of therapeutic effects of lipophilic statins on cognitive and functional changes in Alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 87, 359–372. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Oliveira, F. F., Chen, E. S., Smith, M. C., Bertolucci, P. H. F. (2017). Longitudinal lipid profile variations and clinical change in Alzheimer's disease dementia. Neurosci. Lett. 646, 36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Oliveira, F. F., Chen, E. S., Smith, M. C., Bertolucci, P. H. F. (2020). Selected LDLR and APOE polymorphisms affect cognitive and functional response to lipophilic statins in Alzheimer's disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 70, 1574–1588. doi: 10.1007/s12031-020-01588-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delano-Wood, L., Houston, W. S., Emond, J. A., Marchant, N. L., Salmon, D. P., Jeste, D. V., et al. (2008). APOE genotype predicts depression in women with Alzheimer's disease: a retrospective study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 23, 632–636. doi: 10.1002/gps.1953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duthie, A., Chew, D., Soiza, R. L. (2011). Non-psychiatric comorbidity associated with Alzheimer's disease. QJM 104, 913–920. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrer, L. A., Cupples, L. A., Haines, J. L., Hyman, B., Kukull, W. A., Mayeux, R., et al. (1997). Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 278, 1349–1356. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550160069041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franzmeier, N., Ossenkoppele, R., Brendel, M., Rubinski, A., Smith, R., Kumar, A., et al. (2021). The BIN1 rs744373 Alzheimer's disease risk SNP is associated with faster Aβ-associated tau accumulation and cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement. 18, 700–789. doi: 10.1002/alz.055113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franzmeier, N., Rubinski, A., Neitzel, J., Kim, Y., Damm, A., Na, D. L., et al. (2019). Functional connectivity associated with tau levels in ageing, Alzheimer's, and small vessel disease. Brain 142, 1093–1107. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fullerton, S. M., Clark, A. G., Weiss, K. M., Nickerson, D. A., Taylor, S. L., Stengård, J. H., et al. (2000). Apolipoprotein E variation at the sequence haplotype level: implications for the origin and maintenance of a major human polymorphism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 881–900. doi: 10.1086/303070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandy, S. E., Caporaso, G. L., Buxbaum, J. D., Da O, Silva, C. E., Iverfeldt, K., et al. (1993). Protein phosphorylation regulates relative utilization of processing pathways for Alzheimer beta/A4 amyloid precursor protein. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 695, 117–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb23038.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greenbaum, L., Ravona-Springer, R., Lubitz, I., Schmeidler, J., Cooper, I., Sano, M., et al. (2016). Potential contribution of the Alzheimer's disease risk locus BIN1 to episodic memory performance in cognitively normal Type 2 diabetes elderly. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 26, 787–795. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.11.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, X., Pickering, E., Liu, Y. C., Hall, S., Fournier, H., Katz, E., et al. (2011). Meta-analysis for genome-wide association study identifies multiple variants at the BIN1 locus associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE 6, e16616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huebbe, P., Rimbach, G. (2017). Evolution of human apolipoprotein E (APOE) isoforms: gene structure, protein function and interaction with dietary factors. Ageing Res Rev. 37, 146–161. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iliffe, S., Robinson, L., Brayne, C., Goodman, C., Rait, G., Manthorpe, J., et al. (2009). Primary care and dementia: 1. Diagnosis, screening and disclosure. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 24, 895–901. doi: 10.1002/gps.2204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Itoh, T., De Camilli, P. (2006). BAR, F-BAR (EFC) and ENTH/ANTH domains in the regulation of membrane-cytosol interfaces and membrane curvature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Biol. Lipids 1761, 897–912. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, J. H., Logroscino, G., De Vivo, I., Hunter, D., Grodstein, F. (2005). Apolipoprotein E, cardiovascular disease and cognitive function in aging women. Neurobiol Aging 26, 475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunkle, B. W., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019). Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lambert, J. C., Heath, S., Even, G., Campion, D., Sleegers, K., Hiltunen, M., et al. (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1094–1099. doi: 10.1038/ng.439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lambert, J. C., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C. A., Harold, D., Naj, A. C., Sims, R., Bellenguez, C., et al. (2013). Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452–1458. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Shue, F., Zhao, N., Shinohara, M., Bu, G. (2020). APOE2: protective mechanism and therapeutic implications for Alzheimer's disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 15, 63. doi: 10.1186/s13024-020-00413-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, K. M., Ho, C. H., Ko, S. C., Li, C. Y. (2015). Increased risk of dementia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medicine 94, e930. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindenberger, U., Nagel, I. E., Chicherio, C., Li, S. C., Heekeren, H. R., Bäckman, L. (2008). Age-related decline in brain resources modulates genetic effects on cognitive functioning. Front. Neurosci. 2, 234–244. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.039.2008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Locke, D. E. C., Dueck, A. C., Stonnington, C. M., Knopman, D. S., Geda, Y. E., Caselli, R. J. (2013). Depressive symptoms in healthy apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers and noncarriers: a longitudinal study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 74, 1256–1261. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loy, C. T., Schofield, P. R., Turner, A. M., Kwok, J. B. J. (2014). Genetics of dementia. Lancet 383, 828–840. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60630-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahley, R. (1988). Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology. Science 240, 622–630. doi: 10.1126/science.3283935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marôco, J. (2021). Análise Estatística Com o SPSS Statistics. 8th ed. Pêro Pinheiro, 1015.

Google Scholar

Mayeux, R., Stern, Y. (2012). Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006239. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mooijaart, S. P., Berbée, J. F. P., van Heemst, D., Havekes, L. M., de Craen, A. J. M., Slagboom, P. E., et al. (2006). ApoE Plasma levels and risk of cardiovascular mortality in old age. PLoS Med. 3, e176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Novais, F., Starkstein, S. (2015). Phenomenology of depression in Alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 47, 845–855. doi: 10.3233/JAD-148004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parmar, J., Coe, M. B., Dobbs, B., Mckay, R., Kirwan, M. C., Cooper, T., et al. (2014). Diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care: exploratory study. Can. Fam. Phys. 60, 457–465.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Peila, R., Rodriguez, B. L., Launer, L. J., Honolulu-Asia Aging Study (2002). Type 2 diabetes, APOE gene, and the risk for dementia and related pathologies: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Diabetes 51, 1256–1262. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, W. Q., Zhu, H., Dean, M., Liu, Z., Vu, L., Fan, G., et al. (2016). Amyloid-associated depression and ApoE4 allele: longitudinal follow-up for the development of Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 31, 316–322. doi: 10.1002/gps.4339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebeck, G. W., Reiter, J. S., Strickland, D. K., Hyman, B. T. (1993). Apolipoprotein E in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: allelic variation and receptor interactions. Neuron 11, 575–580. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90070-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosa, I. M., Henriques, A. G., Carvalho, L., Oliveira, J., da Cruz E Silva, O. A. B. (2017). Screening younger individuals in a primary care setting flags putative dementia cases and correlates gastrointestinal diseases with poor cognitive performance. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 43, 15–28. doi: 10.1159/000452485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosa, I. M., Henriques, A. G., Wiltfang, J., da Cruz e Silva, O. A. B. (2018). Putative dementia cases fluctuate as a function of mini-mental state examination cut-off points. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 61, 157–167. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santiago, J. A., Potashkin, J. A. (2021). The impact of disease comorbidities in Alzheimer's disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 38. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.631770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmechel, D. E., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Crain, B. J., Hulette, C. M., Joo, S. H., et al. (1993). Increased amyloid beta-peptide deposition in cerebral cortex as a consequence of apolipoprotein E genotype in late-onset Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9649–9653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schulz, K. F., Grimes, D. A. (2005). Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet 365, 1348–1353. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61034-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sebastiani, P., Gurinovich, A., Nygaard, M., Sasaki, T., Sweigart, B., Bae, H., et al. (2019). APOE alleles and extreme human longevity. J. Gerontol. Ser A 74, 44–51. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seshadri, S., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Ikram, M. A., DeStefano, A. L., Gudnason, V., Boada, M., et al. (2010). Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease. JAMA 303, 1832–1840. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shinohara, M., Kanekiyo, T., Tachibana, M., Kurti, A., Shinohara, M., Fu, Y., et al. (2020). Apoe2 is associated with longevity independent of alzheimer's disease. Elife 9, 1–16. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sing, C. F., Davignon, J. (1985). Role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining normal plasma lipid and lipoprotein variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 37, 268–285.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Singh, B., Mielke, M. M., Parsaik, A. K., Cha, R. H., Roberts, R. O., Scanlon, P. D., et al. (2014). A prospective study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk for mild cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 71, 581–588. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.94

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, J. D. (2000). Apolipoprotein E4: an allele associated with many diseases. Ann. Med. 32, 118–127. doi: 10.3109/07853890009011761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spirin, V., Schmidt, S., Pertsemlidis, A., Cooper, R. S., Cohen, J. C., Sunyaev, S. R. (2007). Common single-nucleotide polymorphisms act in concert to affect plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1298–1303. doi: 10.1086/522497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, L., Hu, C., Zheng, C., Huang, Z., Lv, Z., Huang, J., et al. (2014). Gene-gene interaction between CETP and APOE polymorphisms confers higher risk for hypertriglyceridemia in oldest-old Chinese women. Exp. Gerontol. 55, 129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Steffens, D. C., Au, R., Folstein, M., Summergrad, P., Yee, J., et al. (2008). Amyloid-associated depression: a prodromal depression of Alzheimer disease? Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65, 542–550. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tini, G., Scagliola, R., Monacelli, F., La Malfa, G., Porto, I., Brunelli, C., et al. (2020). Alzheimer's disease and cardiovascular disease: a particular association. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2020:2617970. doi: 10.1155/2020/2617970

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vacínová, G., VejraŽková, D., Lukášová, P., Lischková, O., Dvoráková, K., Rusina, R., et al. (2017). Associations of polymorphisms in the candidate genes for Alzheimer's disease BIN1, CLU, CR1 and PICALM with gestational diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Mol. Biol. Rep. 44, 227–231. doi: 10.1007/s11033-017-4100-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Villeneuve, S., Pepin, V., Rahayel, S., Bertrand, J. A., De Lorimier, M., Rizk, A., et al. (2012). Mild cognitive impairment in moderate to severe COPD: a preliminary study. Chest 142, 1516–1523. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-3035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H. F., Wan, Y., Hao, X. K., Cao, L., Zhu, X. C., Jiang, T., et al. (2016). Bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) genotypes mediate Alzheimer's disease risk by altering neuronal degeneration. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 52, 179–190. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W. W., Liu, X. L., Ruan, Y., Wang, L., Bao, T. H. (2019). Depression was associated with apolipoprotein E ε4 allele polymorphism: a meta-analysis. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 22, 112–117. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2018.30825.7436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weber, A., Hung Mak, S., Berenbaum, F., Sellam, J., Zheng, Y.-P., Han, Y., et al. (2019). Association between osteoarthritis and increased risk of dementia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98, e14355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wisdom, N. M., Callahan, J. L., Hawkins, K. A. (2011). The effects of apolipoprotein E on non-impaired cognitive functioning: a meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Aging 32, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yasuno, F., Tanimukai, S., Sasaki, M., Ikejima, C., Yamashita, F., Kodama, C., et al. (2012). Effect of plasma lipids, hypertension and APOE genotype on cognitive decline. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 2633–2640. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.12.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zlokovic, B. V. (2013). Cerebrovascular effects of apolipoprotein E: implications for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 70, 440–444. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.2152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar