Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Comms. Net., 20 May 2022
Sec. Optical Communications and Networks

Mixed FSO/RF Based Multiple HAPs Assisted Multiuser Multiantenna Terrestrial Communication

  • Computer, Electrical, and Mathematical Science and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

In this work, a mixed free-space optics (FSO)/radio-frequency (RF) based multiple serial high altitude platforms (HAPs) assisted multiuser multiantenna terrestrial communication system is considered. For the considered multi-hop system, earth station to HAP and HAP to HAP links are assumed as FSO links, and HAP to terrestrial mobile users (MUs) link is assumed as RF link. At the FSO detector both the heterodyne detection and intensity modulation direct detection techniques are considered. Atmospheric turbulence of the ES to HAP FSO link is modeled with Gamma-Gamma fading along with the pointing error impairments. As HAP situates in the stratosphere, negligible atmospheric turbulence exists at HAP altitude (20 km), hence, only pointing error is considered for the inter HAP links. Further, the HAP consists of multiantenna array to provide high data-rates to the terrestrial users via RF links, considered to be Nakagami-m distributed. The intermediate HAPs perform selective decode-and-forward relaying and opportunistic user scheduling is performed for the best user selection. For the performance analysis, analytical expression of overall outage probability is obtained and the impact of various selection parameters like pointing error, FSO detection type, MU selection, number of antennas, and RF fading severity are observed on the outage performance. Asymptotic outage probability is also derived to obtain the diversity order of the considered communication system. Further, considering various modulation schemes, a generalized average bit-error-rate expression is derived and the impact of pointing error, FSO detection type, MU selection, number of antennas, and RF fading severity are observed on its performance. Finally, derived results are validated through Monte-Carlo simulations.

1 Introduction

For reliable and robust high data-rate communication for various wireless applications including the emergency disastrous situations, temporary mass events, and even in military applications, promptly deployable flying base stations such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have gained significant research attention as they are capable to provide high data-rates with improved capacity and coverage, targeted for beyond fifth generation (5G) communications(Zhan et al., 2011; Mozaffari et al., 2019). UAVs are broadly categorized into low altitude platform (LAP) and high altitude platform (HAP) based on their size and operating range. The LAPs are situated only few hundred meters above the earth surface, however, the HAPs are usually situated in stratosphere around 17–25 km (km) altitude from the earth surface. As the HAP situates in stratosphere, the wind velocity is low and atmospheric turbulence is negligible, hence, the HAP can be in quasi-static position and is capable to provide ubiquitous connectivity (Kurt et al., 2021). Due to the enhancement in communications technologies, lightweight composite materials, improved efficiency of solar panels and antenna, HAP became an viable aerial network component for various communication applications. The HAPs can be deployed easily and rapidly, their maintenance is easy, and having moderate operational cost than satellite which makes them economically feasible (Fidler et al., 2010; Kurt et al., 2021). Various technological trends of HAPs and their applications in wireless communications have been seen in (d’Oliveira et al., 2016). On the other hand, free-space optics (FSO) has been proven as an efficient replacement to radio-frequency (RF) due to its high operational bandwidth with improved capacity to fulfill the increasing demand of high data-rates for present and future wireless communication networks. FSO operates in unlicensed band, having low cost and easy deployment, and provides high-speed line-of-sight (LoS) communication (Singya et al., 2020; Trichili et al., 2020). The FSO links provide high data-rate secured transmission than the RF links, however requires LoS communication. Further, atmospheric turbulence and weather issues are more severe in terrestrial mobile communication which limits the FSO link’s performance. In such situations, RF links provide more robust communication to mobile users (MUs) than the FSO links. Thus, a hybrid system which can utilize the high data-rate capability of FSO links and the reliable transmission through RF links to terrestrial MUs has gained significant research attention (Trichili et al., 2021).

Various HAP networks like HAPCOS and CAPANINA in Europe, Helicos in USA, SkyNet is Asia, etc. have been deployed successfully for broadband data transmission to a larger distance (in hundreds of km). A considerable work on HAP networks have been seen in the literature. In (Vaiopoulos et al., 2013), authors proposed a HAP assisted setup for WiMAX orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) transmission and derived the outage probability. In (Fidler et al., 2010), authors have shown various field trials to and from HAP using optical links to provide high data-rates. In (David et al., 2004), various considerations for inter-HAP optical link design are shown. In (Parthasarathy et al., 2014), channel modeling of inter-HAP optical link is proposed. In (Shibata et al., 2020), a gigabit HAP system for mobile communications is proposed. An HAP assisted ground to satellite uplink FSO/RF system is proposed in (Swaminathan et al., 2021) with Gamma-Gamma and shadowed-Rician fading for FSO and RF links, respectively, and various performance measures are derived. In (Singya and Alouini, 2021), an HAP assisted downlink hybrid FSO/RF based multiuser multiantenna terrestrial communication system is proposed, where the FSO link is characterized with the Gamma-Gamma distribution with pointing error impairments and Nakagami-m distribution is preferred for RF links. For the performance analysis, analytical expressions of outage probability, asymptotic outage probability, ergodic capacity, effective capacity, and generalized average symbol-error-rate (ASER) expressions of hexagonal-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), cross-QAM, and rectangular QAM are derived. (Liu et al., 2020) focuses on amplify-and-forward (AF) based HAP assisted satellite-terrestrial communication with Gamma-Gamma and Rayleigh distributions for the FSO and RF links, respectively, and obtained the outage probability. In (Antonini et al., 2006), capacity and efficiency of FSO link between the satellite and HAP are obtained for its feasibility. In (Gao et al., 2021), optimization of an intelligent reconfigurable surface assisted HAP network is proposed for downlink communication to terrestrial MUs.

However, a significant work is witnessed on various hybrid FSO/RF systems in the literature. (Bhatnagar and Arti, 2013) considers a hybrid RF/FSO based satellite-terrestrial communication system, where Gamma-Gamma and shadowed-Rician distributions are considered for the FSO and RF links, respectively. Further, analytical ASER expression for M-ary phase-shift keying (MPSK) and asymptotic results are obtained. (Zedini et al., 2016) focuses on a hybrid FSO/RF system with Nakagami-m and Gamma-Gamma fading for the RF and FSO links, respectively, and the analytical expressions of ergodic capacity, outage probability, and bit-error-rate (BER) of binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) are derived. (Chen et al., 2019) covers energy harvesting in hybrid FSO/RF system by obtaining the outage probability. An FSO/RF based satellite-terrestrial communication system is considered in (Ahmad et al., 2017), where satellite is connected through the optical feeder link and provides RF connectivity to terrestrial users, and various performance measures are derived for analysis. (Zedini et al., 2020) focuses on an FSO/RF based satellite-terrestrial communication system with Gamma-Gamma distributed uplink optical feeder link and shadowed-Rician distributed downlink RF terrestrial users links, and ergodic capacity, outage probability, and BER expressions of BPSK are derived. In (Sharma et al., 2019), switching-based FSO/RF system is proposed and various performance measures are obtained. (Lee et al., 2020) focuses on the data throughput maximization for UAV based FSO/RF system. Further, in (Singya et al., 2020), ASER performance of various higher order complex QAM schemes is obtained for a mixed RF/FSO system with outdated channel state information. In (Xu and Song, 2021) and (Xu and Song, 2020), hybrid RF/FSO based communication systems are considered, where RF link is characterized with κμ distribution and the FSO link is characterized with the M- distribution with pointing error impairments. For performance analysis, outage probability, asymptotic outage probability, ergodic capacity, and ABER results are obtained. In (Xu and Zhang, 2021), a hybrid RF/FSO based deep space communication system is considered, where exponentiated Weibull and Nakagami-m distributions are considered respectively for the FSO and RF links; and outage probability, ergodic capacity, and ABER of MPSK are derived.

In the literature, some papers have discussed FSO based multi-hop communication systems. In (Datsikas et al., 2010; Zedini and Alouini, 2015; Ashrafzadeh et al., 2020), authors have analyzed the performance of multi-hop FSO systems. (Altubaishi and Alhamawi, 2019) focuses on the capacity analysis of a multi-hop FSO/RF system. In (Wang et al., 2015), authors have discussed the performance of multi-hop exponentiated Weibull distributed FSO system. However, above discussed multi-hop works focus only on generalized FSO systems without including HAP networks.

On the other hand, HAPs are having a wide 500 km radius footprint as recommended by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (ITU-Radiocommun, 2000). Further, most of the HAP assisted projects have smaller coverage area and combining multiple HAPs can provide coverage to even entire country. For example, authors in (Miura and Oodo, 2001) and (Milas et al., 2003) have proposed respectively 16 and 18 HAPs configurations to provide coverage to entire Japan and Greece. However, only few works focus on the performance of multi-hop HAP/LAP assisted communication system. In (Yang et al., 2018), outage probability of LAP assisted RF/FSO/RF multi-hop system is derived. In (Sharma et al., 2016), authors have evaluated the performance of inter-HAP FSO communication system. Authors in (Michailidis et al., 2018) have discussed the performance of a three-hop HAP assisted RF/FSO/RF communication system. The above discussed works are summarized in Table 1 in details. The various considerations, channel models, and derived performance metrics are shown in Table 1 which are compared with our work (highlighted in bold letters) to show the novelty of our work.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Various related works.

As discussed above, we have seen significant works on dual-hop hybrid FSO/RF based systems. However, very limited work is seen on HAP assisted multi-hop hybrid FSO/RF scenario. Motivated with this, in this work, a highly reliable, robust, and high capacity long distance multiple serial HAPs assisted mixed FSO/RF multiuser multiantenna communication system is proposed. In the proposed system, end-to-end (e2e) long distance communication is completed through high bandwidth, high capacity FSO links established between the earth station (ES) to HAP and between multiple serial HAPs situated several hundred kilometer apart, and finally to the terrestrial MUs through the RF links via multiantenna array deployed at the final HAP. The intermediate HAPs are performing selective decode-and-forward (DF) relaying. Atmospheric turbulence of the ES to HAP link is modeled with Gamma-Gamma fading along with the pointing error impairments. As HAP situates at 20 km altitude, negligible atmospheric turbulence exists hence, only pointing error is considered for the inter HAP links. A multiantenna array is deployed at the HAP and Nakagami-m fading is considered for the RF links. Further, opportunistic user scheduling is performed for the best user selection. From this prospective, the major contributions of this work are as follows:

• For the performance analysis, individual link’s outage probability and overall outage probability are derived and the impact of pointing error, FSO detection type, MU selection, number of antennas, and RF fading severity are observed on the outage performance.

• To obtain the diversity order of the communication system, asymptotic outage probability is derived by performing the high SNR approximation.

• Considering various modulation schemes, a generalized average BER (ABER) expression is also derived and the impact of pointing error, FSO detection type, MU selection, number of antennas, and RF fading severity are observed on its performance.

Note that the proposed system model and the analysis shown in this work is generalized. By considering number of HAPs N = 1, the multi-hop serial HAPs assisted mixed FSO/RF system can be converted into a dual-hop HAP assisted mixed FSO/RF system. By considering number of users U = 1, the performance of Uth terrestrial MU can be obtained. Further, all the parameters can be adjusted and the considered system model can be deployed for various specific applications.

Rest of the work is organized as follows: In Section II, proposed system model and channel model are discussed in detail. Various performance measures like outage probability, asymptotic outage probability, and generalized ABER are discussed in detail in Section III, Section IV, and Section V, respectively. Section VI discusses various theoretical and simulation results of the proposed system and conclusions from the obtained results are finally illustrated in Section VII.

2 System and Channel Models

2.1 System Model

In this work, a mixed FSO/RF based multiuser multiantenna inter-HAP configuration is considered to provide high data-rates to the terrestrial MUs as shown in Figure 1. We have considered a communication scenario, where a source ES is communicating to the terrestrial MUs which are far apart through the use of multiple serial HAPs. Initially, the ES transmits the optical signal s(t) to HAP in first time slot. Hence, the received optical signal at the first HAP can be expressed as

yHt=PsηδEHIr/2st+nEHt,(1)

where η is the optical-to-electrical conversion coefficient and r decides the type of FSO detector, wherein r = 1 corresponds to the heterodyne detection and r = 2 represents the IM/DD. Here I = IaIp represents the fading coefficient of the FSO link, where Ia is the fading due to atmospheric turbulence and Ip represents the pointing error associated with the FSO link. Further, nEH(t)N(0,σo2) represents the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with zero mean and σo2 variance associated with the ES to HAP link. The noise variance is σ02=KBoTo, where K = 1.38 × 10–23 is the Boltzmann constant, To represents the noise temperature in kelvin, and Bo is the optical receiver bandwidth. Further, δEH represents the path-loss while transmitting the source signal from ES to HAP through the FSO link. δEH=GtEGrHFSL, where GtE is the ES transmitter telescope gain, GrH is the receiver telescope gain at the HAP, and FSL=4πLλo is the free-space loss, wherein L is the ES-HAP path length and λo is the optical signal wavelength. A 1550 nm wavelength optical beam is considered which is eye safe and most suitable due to minimum Doppler shift than other frequencies. Therefore, the instantaneous received SNR at HAP will be

γH=PsηδEHIrσo2.(2)

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Considered system model.

N intermediate HAPs with DF relaying are considered for e2e signal transmission. Hence, at the HAP, the received signal is first decoded, re-encoded, and then transmitted to the next HAP. The received signal can only be decoded successfully if the instantaneous received SNR at nth HAP is greater than or equal to the threshold SNR i.e. γHnγth. Hence, probability of successful detection (χ(γHn)) is defined as

χγHn=0,for γHn<γth1,for γHnγth(3)

Let, ŝ(t) is the decoded signal, then the optical signal received at the nth HAP is represented as

yHnt=χγHn1PHn1ηδHHIpr/2ŝt+nHHt,(4)

where PHn1 is the transmitted power from the (n − 1)th HAP, Ip is the FSO channel fading coefficient which only consists of pointing error and no atmospheric turbulence is considered. Further, nHH(t) represents the AWGN associated with the HAP-HAP link with zero mean and σo2 variance. Also, δHH=GtHGrHFSLHH is the path-loss of the HAP-HAP link and considered to be same between all the HAPs. Here, GtH represents the gain of the transmitting telescope of the (n − 1)th HAP and GrH is the receiver telescope gain of the nth HAP. Further, FSLHH=4πDλo is the free-space loss in the HAP-HAP link, where D is the inter-HAP distance. Hence, instantaneous received SNR at the nth HAP is given as γHn=χ(γHn1)(PHn1ηδHHIp)r/σo2.

Finally, the decoded signal from the Nth HAP is transmitted to the terrestrial MUs. To improve the channel capacity of the RF link and to improve its reliability, Nt transmit antennas are deployed at the HAP. However, due to size limit constraint, only single antenna is assumed at the terrestrial MUs. Hence, in the last-hop, the signal received from the Nth HAP at the uth MU after transmit beamforming is given as

yMut=χγNPNδHMuhuHwuŝt+nHMut,(5)

where PN is the Nth HAP’s transmit power and χ(γN)=n=1Nχ(γHn) is the probability of successful detection till the Nth HAP. Here huH and wuCNt×1 denote the channel vector of Nt × 1 order and transmit beamforming weight vector between the Nth HAP and the uth UE, respectively. Further, (⋅)H is a Hermitian operator and maximal ratio transmission (MRT) principle is used for the beamforming weight vector as wu=huhuF, wherein (⋅)‖F being the Frobenius norm. Further, nHMu(t) represents the AWGN associated with the RF link of zero mean and σr2=KTrBrNF variance, where K = 1.38 × 10–23 is the Boltzmann constant, Tr represents the noise temperature in kelvin, Br is the RF receiver bandwidth, and NF is the noise figure. Furthermore, δHMu is the path-loss associated with the RF link which can be given as (Swaminathan et al., 2021)

δHMudB=GtH+GruLFLALRLO,(6)

where GtH is the Nth HAP’s transmitter gain, Gru is the uth user’s receiver gain, LF = 20 log10fRF + 20 log10Lu + 92.45 is the free-space loss of the RF link between the HAP and uth terrestrial user of Lu distance (in km) with fRF transmission frequency, LA is the gaseous atmospheric loss, LR is the loss by rain attenuation in dB/km, and LO represents the miscellaneous losses including antenna degradation, polarization mismatch, antenna mispointing, etc. Hence, e2e instantaneous received SNR at the uth MU is calculated as

γMu=χγNPNδHU2|wuHhu|2σr2=χγNγHMu.(7)

2.2 Channel Model

2.2.1 Earth Station to HAP Link

ES-HAP link is considered as an FSO link and its fading coefficient is characterized as I = IpIa, where Ip is the pointing error and Ia is the atmospheric turbulence induced fading. Let us assume, a Gaussian beam of beamwidth ωL is propagating L distance from the transmitter to receiver with a aperture radius, the fraction of the transmitted power collected by the receiver is approximately given as (Farid and Hranilovic, 2007)

Iprd;LA0exp2rd2ωLeq2,(8)

where A0 represents the fraction of the collected power at rd = 0, rd is the radial displacement between the detector and beam center, and ωLeq2 is the equivalent beamwidth which is given as ωLeq2=A0π2v0exp(v02)ωL2. Further, A0=[erf(v0)]2, where v0=a2π2ωL2, wherein erf(⋅) represents the error function. It is to be noted that the approximation (8) exists only for ωL > 6a. Figure 2 shows various pointing errors for an FSO system. Let us consider dx and dy are the horizontal and vertical displacements of the beam in the detector plane, then rd=[dx,dy]T denotes the vector for radial displacement as shown in Figure 2. It is assumed that dx and dy are independent and Gaussian distributed as dxN(ψx,σx2) and dyN(ψy,σy2), respectively. Then the amplitude of the radial vector |d|=dx2+dy2 is Beckmann distributed (Beckmann and Spizzichino, 1987). Thus, the pointing error of the FSO link can be modeled in various ways according to the jitter and boresight values (Jung et al., 2020).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Pointing errors in FSO links.

Considering the case of identical jitters and zero boresight error, mean values ψx and ψy of the radial vectors dx and dy are zero and variances are identical as σx2=σy2=σ2. Hence, the radial displacement follows Rayleigh distribution. For such case, the pointing error can be modeled as

fIpx=ϵ2A0ϵ2xϵ21,for 0xA0(9)

where ϵ=ωLeq2σ is the ratio of the equivalent beam radius to the standard deviation of jitter at the receiver.

The atmospheric turbulence Ia can be modeled with Gamma-Gamma distribution, its probability density function (PDF) is given as

fIax=2αβα+β/2ΓαΓβxα+β/21Kαβ2αβx,(10)

where Kv(⋅) represents the vth order modified Bessel function of second kind. Further, α and β are the fading coefficients of the atmospheric turbulence which are given as

α=exp0.49σRV21+1.11σRV12/57/611β=exp0.51σRV21+0.69σRV12/55/611(11)

where σRV2 is the Rytov variance corresponds to the turbulence strength metric. A slant path exists between the ES and the HAP, hence, the Rytov variance for this path can be given as

σRV2h=2.25sec116θk076h0HCn2hhh056dh,(12)

where θ is the zenith angle, k0 = 2π/λo denotes the wave number, H is the HAP altitude, and h0 is the ES height. Further, Cn2 is the refractive index structure parameter, depends upon the strength of the atmospheric turbulence and is modeled by Hufnagel-Valley model as a function of altitude h which is given as

Cn2h=0.00594w0272105h10exph1000+2.7×1016exph1500+Cn20exph100,(13)

where Cn2(0) shows the turbulence strength at ground in m−2/3 and w0 is the rms wind speed in m/s. The PDF of the FSO channel fading coefficient (I) can be given as

fII=fI|IaI|IafIaIadIa.(14)

Considering the identical jitters and zero boresight error case, the resulting conditional distribution is expressed as

fI|IaI|Ia=1IafIpIIa=ϵ2A0ϵ2IaIIaϵ21for 0IA0Ia(15)

Substituting (10) and (15) in (14), we get

fII=ϵ2A0ϵ22αβα+β/2ΓαΓβIϵ21I/A0Iaα+β2ϵ21Kαβ2αβIadIa.(16)

Representing the modified Bessel function of the second kind into Meijer-G form as Kv(x)=G0,22,0[x24v/2,v/2,], solving (16) with the help of (Wolframe, 1998, (07.34.21.0085.01)), and after some mathematical simplifications, we get

fII=ϵ2αβA0ΓαΓβG1,33,0αβA0Iϵ21,α1,β1ϵ2.(17)

Instantaneous received SNR of the ES-HAP FSO link is calculated as γH = μr(I)r, where r represents the type of FSO detector and μr is the average power of the FSO link. For heterodyne detection, r = 1, and hence, μ1=γ̄H. For the IM/DD detection, r = 2, and hence, μ2=ϵ2αβ(ϵ2+2)(α+1)(β+1)(ϵ2+1)2γ̄H. After change of variable in (17), the PDF of the e2e SNR of the FSO link is given as

fγHx=ϵ2rΓαΓβxG1,33,0αβA0xμr1/rϵ2,α,βϵ2+1.(18)

Substituting (18) in FγH(x)=0xfγH(γ)dγ and applying (Wolframe, 1998, (07.34.21.0084.01)) with some mathematical computations, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the SNR of the FSO link for both the detection techniques is given as

FγHx=AGr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrx|ϱ2,01,ϱ1,(19)

where ϱ1=[ϵ2+1r,,ϵ2+rr], ϱ2=[ϵ2r,,ϵ2+r1r,αr,,α+r1r,βr,,β+r1r], A=r(α+β2)ϵ2(2π)r1Γ(α)Γ(β), and B=(αβ)rr2r.

2.2.2 Inter HAP Links

The HAP is situated in the stratosphere above the clouds and there is almost negligible atmospheric turbulence. Hence, only the pointing error is considered between inter-HAP links. As identical jitters with zero boresight error is considered, the pointing error can be modeled by Rayleigh distribution and its PDF is given in (9). Now instantaneous received SNR at the nth HAP for the FSO link is calculated as γHn=γ̄Hn(Ip)r, where γ̄Hn is the average received power at the FSO detector of nth HAP. After change of variable in (17), the PDF of the instantaneous received SNR of the HAP-HAP link is given as1

fγHHx=ϵo2rA0ϵo21γ̄Hnϵo2rxϵo2r1,for 0xA0γ̄Hnr(20)

Performing FγHH(x)=0xfγHH(γ)dγ, the CDF of the HAP-HAP link can be given as

FγHHx=1A0ϵo2xγ̄Hnϵo2r,for 0xA0γ̄r1,else(21)

2.2.3 HAP to MUs RF Links

To connect the terrestrial MUs, communication between the HAP and the MUs is established through the RF links. Considering the size constraint of the MUs, single antenna is assumed at the MUs. Further, multiple transmit antennas (Nt) are considered at the HAP to avail the antenna diversity. The Nakagami-m distribution is considered for the RF link i.e. Nak(m, Ω), where m is the fading severity and Ω is the average power of the RF link. Hence, the CDF and PDF of the uth MU’s SNR can be given as

fγHMux=1ΓmNtmγ̄UmNtxmNt1expmγ̄UxFγHMux=11ΓmNtΓmNt,mγ̄Ux,(22)

respectively, where Γ(⋅) represents the complete gamma function and γ̄U=Ωγ̄HMu. It is considered that the terrestrial MUs are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) as they are close to each others. Hence, opportunistic user scheduling is performed to achive the multiuser diversity. Therefore, the instantaneous received SNR of the HAP-MU link after opportunistic scheduling is γHM=Maxu=1,2,,UγHMu. Thus, the PDF of γHM after the order statistics is given as

fγHMx=UFγHMuxU1fγHMux.(23)

Invoking the PDF and CDF values from (22) in (23) and using the series representation of the incomplete Gamma function with multinomial expansion using (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, 2000, (0.314)), the PDF of γHM can be derived as

fγHMx=Uj=0U1U1j1jl=0jmNt1×ϖljmγ̄UmNt+l1ΓmNtxmNt+l1expmγ̄Uj+1x,(24)

where ϖlj is recursively calculated as ϖ0j=(δ0)j, ϖ1j=j(δ1), ϖlj=1lδ0k=1l[(kjl+k)δkϖlkj] for 2 ≤ l ≤ (mNt − 1), ϖlj=1lδ0k=1mNt1[(kjl+k)δkϖlkj] for mNtl < j(mNt − 1), and ϖj(mNt1)j=(δmNt1)j, wherein δl=1l! (Singya et al., 2018, 2019). Using FγHM(x)=0xfγHM(γ)dγ, the CDF of (24) can be obtained as

FγHMx=Uj,lC0C2C1ϒ(C1,C2x),(25)

where j,l=j=0U1l=0j(mNt1), C0=U(U1j)(1)jϖlj(mγ̄U)mNt+l1Γ(mNt), C1=mNt+l, and C2=mγ̄U(j+1).

3 Outage Probability

Outage probability is one of the important performance measures and defines the probability of reaching the instantaneous e2e SNR below a fixed threshold (γth). For the considered system, e2e instantaneous received SNR is shown in (7), hence the overall outage probability is given as

Poγth=11FγHγthES-HAP1FγHHγthN1HAP-HAP1FγHMγthHAP-EU.(26)

Substituting the respective CDF values of the individual links in (26), we get

Poγth=11AGr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrγth|ϱ2,01,ϱ1×11A0ϵo2γthγ̄Hnϵo2rN11Uj,lC0C2C1ϒ(C1,C2γth).(27)

Using the binomial series expansion and after some mathematical computations, (27) can be solved as

Poγth=AGr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrxϱ2,01,ϱ1z=1N1N1z1z1A0ϵo2zγthγ̄Hnϵo2zr+Uj,lC0C2C1ϒC1,C2γth+Uj,lz=1N1N1z1z1A0ϵo2zC0C2C11γ̄Hnϵo2zrγthϵo2zrϒC1,C2γth+Az=1N1N1z1z1A0ϵo2zγthγ̄Hnϵo2zrGr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrxϱ2,01,ϱ1AUj,lC0C2C1ϒC1,C2γthGr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrxϱ2,01,ϱ1AUj,lz=1N1N1z1z1A0ϵo2zC0C2C11γ̄Hnϵo2zrγthϵo2zrϒC1,C2γth×Gr+1,3r+13r,1BA0rμrxϱ2,01,ϱ1].(28)

4 Asymptotic Outage Probability

Various insights on the system’s performance can be highlighted through the obtained outage probability (28). However, (28) is quite complex to decide the diversity order of the considered system. Hence, in this Section, we have conducted asymptotic analysis on the outage probability to obtain the diversity order. For this, the transmit SNR is assumed to tend to infinity. Therefore, at high SNR, (26) can be approximated as

PoAγthFγHAγth+N1×FγHHAγth+FγHMAγth.(29)

Corollary 1: By using the identities as shown in (34) and (35), asymptotic outage probability for the considered system is expressed as

PoAγthAp=13rBγthA0rμrϱ4,pq=1qp3rΓϱ4,qϱ4,pq=11Γ1ϱ3,q+ϱ4,pq=2r+1Γϱ3,qϱ4,p3r+13r+1Γ1ϱ4,q+ϱ4,p+N1A0ϵo2γthγ̄Hnϵo2r+1ΓmNt+1Umγthγ̄UUmNt.(30)

From (34), we observed that min(ϵ2r,αr,βr) is the dominant term of meijer-G function. Hence, the diversity order of the overall system is given as min(ϵ2r,αr,βr,ϵo2r,UmNt).

Proof: See the Appendix.

5 Average BER Analysis

For various modulation schemes, a generalized ABER expression for the considered communication system can be given as (Zedini et al., 2020)

Pe=κ2Γ1/2p=1n0gp0x1/2egpxPoγdγ,(31)

where n0, κ, and gp are the selection parameters for various modulation schemes and their values are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Selection parameters for various modulation schemes (Zedini et al., 2020).

Please note that by using the IM/DD, we can obtain the ABER performance of on-off keying (OOK), preferred commonly in practical FSO systems as it is flexible to laser nonlinearity with ease of use. Further, we have analyzed the ABER performance of various MPSK (including the BPSK) and MQAM schemes using the coherent heterodyne detection at FSO receivers. Now plugin (28) in (31), and performing various mathematical computations by using (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, 2000, (3.351),(6.455),(7.813), (8.352)) to solve the integrals, the final generalized analytical ABER expression is derived as

Pe=κ2Γ1/2p=1ngp[I1I2+I3+I4+I5I6I7],(32)

where

I1=AF112,gp,I2=z=1N1N1z1zA0ϵo2z1γ̄Hnϵo2zrΓϵo2zr+12gpϵo2zr+12,I3=Uj,lC0C2C1F212,gp,I4=Uj,lC0C2C1z=1N1N1z1zA0ϵo2z1γ̄Hnϵo2zrF2ϵo2zr+12,gp,I5=Az=1N1N1z1zA0ϵo2z1γ̄Hnϵo2zrF1ϵo2zr+12,gp,I6=AUj,lC0C2C1ΓC1F112,C2+gpz1=0C11C2z1z1!F1z1+12,C2+gp,I7=AUj,lC0C2C1z=1N1N1z1zA0ϵo2z1γ̄Hnϵo2zrΓC1×F1ϵo2zr+12,C2+gpz1=0C11C2z1z1!F1ϵo2zrz1+12,C2+gp,(33)

wherein F1(ϕ1,ϕ2)=(ϕ2)ϕ11Gr+1,3r+13r,1[Bϕ2(A0)rμrx|ϱ2,0ϕ1,1,ϱ1] and F2(ϕ1,ϕ2)=C2C1Γ(C1+ϕ1)C1(C2+ϕ2)C1+ϕ12F1(1,C1+ϕ1;C1+1,C2C2+ϕ2).

6 Theoretical and Simulation Results

In this Section, numerical values from the derived results are obtained and are validated through the simulations performed through Matlab by conducting 108 realizations. The atmospheric turbulence of ES-HAP link is generated by the product of two generalized Gamma distributed random variables. The radial displacement parameter is considered to be Rayleigh distributed and is applied to (8) for pointing error impairments. Throughout the analysis, η = 1 is considered. Unity transmit power is considered at all the nodes and γth = 1 dB is considered for the analysis. Further, parameters related to various links are shown in Table 3 unless otherwise stated.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Various parameters of interest.

In Figure 3, analytical and simulation results of outage probability against transmit SNR are shown for all three links. In Figure 3A, analytical and simulation results of ES-HAP link are compared for both the IM/DD and heterodyne detection (Het. in figures) techniques for different atmospheric turbulence conditions based on various ground turbulence i.e. Cn2(0)=1.7×1014, Cn2(0)=5×1013, and Cn2(0)=1×1012, (in m−2/3) respectively for weak, moderate, and strong ground turbulence conditions. Simulation results match well with the analytical results and validate the accuracy. From Figure 3A, we observe a significant improvement in outage performance while going from strong to weak turbulence for both the detection techniques. Also, heterodyne detection provides significant performance improvement than IM/DD due to its capability in handling turbulence effects more efficiently despite having implementation complexity (Zedini et al., 2016). For the performance analysis, a = 10 cm, ωL = 50 cm, and σ = 10 cm are considered which corresponds to ϵ = 2.553. The same can be conducted for different values of ϵ by varying these selection parameters to show the impact of pointing error. In Figure 3B, analytical and simulation results of HAP-HAP link are compared for various values of ωL/a which corresponds to different values of ϵo. Simulation results match well with the analytical results and validate the accuracy. Further, selection of appropriate values of a, ωL, and σ results in an appropriate ϵo for desired system performance. Figure 3C compares the analytical and simulation results of HAP to terrestrial MUs link for different values of fading severity m, number of antenna Nt, and number of terrestrial users U. U = 1 gives the performance of uth terrestrial MU while increasing U gives the flexibility of user selection. Considering U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 as a reference case, we observe significant performance improvement while increasing m or Nt or both. However, increase in Nt gives better performance than increase in m. Increase in U provides the user selection flexibility and improves the outage performance further.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Comparison of analytical and simulation results of individual link’s outage probability against transmit SNR for (A) ES-HAP link, (B) HAP-HAP link, and (C) HAP-MUs link.

In Figure 4, analytical, simulation, and asymptotic results of overall system outage probability are compared for various values of U, m, and Nt while heterodyne detection is considered at FSO receiver. For the analysis, Cn2(0)=5×1013m2/3 is considered and ωL/a = 5 for moderate pointing error (Figure 4A) and ωL/a = 2 for severe pointing error (Figure 4B) are considered. Rest of the parameters are shown in Table 3. From Figure 4A, considering U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 as reference case, for an outage probability of 10–2, approximately 8.7 and 11.7 dB gains are achieved while increasing m from one to two and Nt from 1 to 2, respectively. This indicates better performance with an increase in Nt than m by approximately 3 dB. Further, the gain is same throughout the SNR range except for U = 1, m = 2, Nt = 2 and U = 2, m = 2, Nt = 2 cases. For U = 2, m = 2, Nt = 2, there must be a significant performance improvement as shown in Figure 3C, however, only slight improvement is observed over U = 1, m = 2, Nt = 2. This is because the ES-HAP FSO link’s performance reaches to its saturation which limits the overall outage performance. Hence, no further performance improvement is achieved with the increase in U, m, and Nt beyond U = 2, m = 2, Nt = 2 case. In Figure 4B, ωL/a = 2 is maintained for the FSO links for severe pointing error case. From Figure 4B, by considering U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 as reference case, we can observe a clear performance improvement for U = 1, m = 2, Nt = 1 or U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 2. For further increase in U, m, or Nt, we can observe slight improvement only in the low and medium SNR range. However, no such improvement can be seen at high SNRs and all the curves merge with each other. This is because the ES-HAP FSO link’s performance saturates early due to severe pointing error which limits the overall outage performance. Simulation results validate the analytical results presented in Figure 4. Further, asymptotic results on outage probability are also shown in Figure 4 which match with the outage results at high SNRs for all the considered cases and validates the high SNR approximation. Further, the diversity order of the overall system is obtained as min(ϵ2r,αr,βr,ϵo2r,UmNt).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Analytical, simulation, and asymptotic results of overall outage probability against transmit SNR for (A) Moderate pointing error and (B) Severe pointing error.

In Figure 5, analytical and simulation results of ABER for 4-QAM are compared for various values of U, m, and Nt while heterodyne detection is considered at the FSO receiver. For the analysis, Cn2(0)=5×1013m2/3 is considered and ωL/a = 5 for moderate pointing error (Figure 5A) and ωL/a = 2 for severe pointing error (Figure 5B) are considered. Rest of the parameters are shown in Table 3. From Figure 5A, a significant improvement in ABER performance is observed with the increase in m, Nt, U or all as compared to the U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 reference case. Further, simulation results validate the derived analytical results. Considering U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 as a reference case, for an ABER of 10–2, approximately 5.2 and 8.1 dB gains achieved while increasing m from one to two and Nt from 1 to 2, respectively. Hence, increase in Nt gives nearly 2.9 dB gain than the increase in m. Also for U = 2, m = 2, Nt = 2, only marginal improvement is observed over the U = 1, m = 2, Nt = 2 case. This is due to the fact that the ES-HAP FSO link’s performance reaches to its saturation which limits the overall ABER performance. Hence, no further performance improvement is achieved with the increase in U, m, and Nt beyond U = 2, m = 2, Nt = 2 case. In Figure 5B, ωL/a = 2 is maintained for the FSO links for severe pointing error case. From Figure 5B, by considering U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 1 as reference case, we can observe a clear ABER performance improvement for U = 1, m = 2, Nt = 1 or U = 1, m = 1, Nt = 2. However, for further increase in U, m, or Nt, we can observe slight improvement only in the low and medium SNR range. However, no so such improvement can be seen at high SNRs and all the curves merge with each other. This is because the ES-HAP FSO link’s performance saturates early due to severe pointing error which limits the overall ABER performance. Further, simulation results validate the analytical results presented in Figure 5 for all the cases.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Analytical and simulation results of ABER against transmit SNR for 4-QAM with heterodyne detection at FSO receiver for (A) Moderate pointing error and (B) Severe pointing error.

In Figure 6, ABER of various modulation schemes are compared against transmit SNR. For OOK modulation, IM/DD detection is considered at the FSO receiver while heterodyne detection is preferred for the rest of the complex modulation schemes. For the analysis, U = 1, m = 1, and Nt = 2 are considered and other parameters are mentioned in Table 3. It is observed that BPSK provides significant gain in ABER performance than OOK as heterodyne detection provides significant performance improvement over IM/DD. To achieve an ABER of 10–2, BPSK provides around 15 dB gain over the OOK. Further, it is observed that the ABER performance of 4-QAM is same as 4-PSK. However, with the increase in constellation order, MQAM outperforms the MPSK. For an ABER of 10–3, 16-QAM provides approximately 3.2 dB gain over the 16-PSK. This gain improves further with the increase in M.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. ABER comparison for various modulation schemes.

7 Conclusion

In this work, a mixed FSO/RF based multiple serial HAPs assisted multiuser multiantenna terrestrial communication system was considered, where ES-HAP and HAP-HAP links were FSO links and HAP to terrestrial MUs link was an RF link. Both the heterodyne detection and IM/DD techniques were considered at FSO receivers. The atmospheric turbulence of ES-HAP link was modeled with gamma-gamma fading with pointing error impairments. The HAP-HAP links were assumed to have pointing errors only. Multiantenna array was considered at the Nth HAP and best user selection was performed to improve the performance of RF links for the terrestrial users which were Nakagami-m distributed. For the performance analysis, analytical expressions of individual link’s outage probability, overall outage probability, asymptotic outage probability, and a generalized ABER expression of various modulation schemes were derived. Finally, the impact of various selection parameters like pointing error, FSO detection type, MU selection, RF fading severity, and the number of antennas were observed on their performance. The proposed system model and the analysis shown in this work is generalized. All the parameters can be adjusted and the considered system model can be deployed for various specific wireless communication applications. By considering number of HAPs equal to one, the multi-hop serial HAPs assisted hybrid FSO/RF system can be converted into a dual-hop HAP assisted hybrid FSO/RF system which can be applied for a short range highly reliable and robust high data-rate communication for various wireless applications including the emergency disastrous situations, temporary mass events, and even in military applications. By considering N HAPs in a serial mode, the coverage for the communication can be improved till several hundred kilometers and the problem of connecting the unconnected can be solved.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work is supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia for the support.

Footnotes

1Please note that ϵo is same as ϵ, related to the severity of pointing error. However, ϵo shows the severity of pointing error of the inter-HAP links which is different than ϵ related to the ES-HAP link’s pointing error severity because different selection parameters are considered for both the links.

References

Ahmad, I., Nguyen, K. D., and Letzepis, N. (2017). “Performance Analysis of High Throughput Satellite Systems with Optical Feeder Links,” in IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Singapore, 4–8 Dec 2017 (IEEE), 1–7. doi:10.1109/glocom.2017.8255105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Antonini, M., Betti, S., Carrozzo, V., Duca, E., and Ruggieri, M. (2006). “Feasibility Analysis of a HAP-LEO Optical Link for Data Relay Purposes,” in IEEE Aero. Conf., Big Sky, MT, USA, 4–11 March 2006 (IEEE), 1–7.

Google Scholar

Ashrafzadeh, B., Zaimbashi, A., Soleimani-Nasab, E., and Uysal, M. (2020). Unified Performance Analysis of Multi-Hop FSO Systems over Double Generalized Gamma Turbulence Channels with Pointing Errors. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 19, 7732–7746. doi:10.1109/twc.2020.3015780

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beckmann, P., and Spizzichino, A. (1987). The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House Radar Library; Artech Print on Demand.

Google Scholar

Bhatnagar, M. R., and Arti, M. K. (2013). Performance Analysis of Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial FSO Cooperative System. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 25, 2197–2200. doi:10.1109/lpt.2013.2282836

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Yang, L., Wang, W., Yang, H.-C., Liu, Y., Hasna, M. O., et al. (2019). A Novel Energy Harvesting Scheme for Mixed FSO-RF Relaying Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68, 8259–8263. doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2925736

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Datsikas, C. K., Peppas, K. P., Sagias, N. C., and Tombras, G. S. (2010). Serial Free-Space Optical Relaying Communications over Gamma-Gamma Atmospheric Turbulence Channels. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2, 576–586. doi:10.1364/jocn.2.000576

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

David, F., Giggenbach, D., Henniger, H., Horwath, J., Landrock, R., and Perlot, N. (2004). “Design Considerations for Optical Inter-HAP Links,” in AIAA Int. Commun. Satellite Syst. Conf. Exhibit (ICSSC), 3144. doi:10.2514/6.2004-3144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

d’Oliveira, F. A., Melo, F. C. L. D., and Devezas, T. C. (2016). High-Altitude Platforms—Present Situation and Technology Trends. J. Aero. Technol. Manage. 8, 249–262. doi:10.5028/jatm.v8i3.699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farid, A. A., and Hranilovic, S. (2007). Outage Capacity Optimization for Free-Space Optical Links with Pointing Errors. J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 1702–1710. doi:10.1109/jlt.2007.899174

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fidler, F., Knapek, M., Horwath, J., and Leeb, W. R. (2010). Optical Communications for High-Altitude Platforms. IEEE J. Select. Top. Quan. Electron. 16, 1058–1070. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2010.2047382

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, N., Jin, S., Li, X., and Matthaiou, M. (2021). Aerial RIS-Assisted High Altitude Platform Communications. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 10, 2096–2100. doi:10.1109/lwc.2021.3091164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gradshteyn, I., and Ryzhik, I. (2000). Table of Integrals, Series and Products. 6th ed. New York, NY, USA: Academic.

Google Scholar

ITU-Radiocommun (2000). Preferred Characteristics of Systems in the Fixed Service Using High Altitude Platforms Operating in the Bands 47.2-47.5 GHz and 47.9-48.2 GHz. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, Electronic Publication. https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/f/R-REC-F.1500-0-200005-I!!PDF-E.pdf.

Google Scholar

Jung, K.-J., Nam, S. S., Alouini, M.-S., and Ko, Y.-C. (2020). Unified Finite Series Approximation of FSO Performance Over Strong Turbulence Combined with Various Pointing Error Conditions. IEEE Trans. Commun. 68, 6413–6425. doi:10.1109/tcomm.2020.3008459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kong, H., Lin, M., Zhu, W.-P., Amindavar, H., and Alouini, M.-S. (2020). Multiuser Scheduling for Asymmetric FSO/RF Links in Satellite-UAV-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 9, 1235–1239. doi:10.1109/lwc.2020.2986750

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurt, G. K., Khoshkholgh, M. G., Alfattani, S., Ibrahim, A., Darwish, T. S. J., Alam, M. S., et al. (2021). A Vision and Framework for the High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) Networks of the Future. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 23, 729–779. doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3066905

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J.-H., Park, K.-H., Ko, Y.-C., and Alouini, M.-S. (2020). Throughput Maximization of Mixed FSO/RF UAV-Aided Mobile Relaying with a Buffer. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 20, 683–694. doi:10.1109/TWC.2020.3028068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, R., Chen, T., Fan, L., and Dang, A. (2019). Performance Analysis of a Multiuser Dual-Hop Amplify-And-Forward Relay System with FSO/RF Links. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 11, 362–370. doi:10.1364/jocn.11.000362

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Lin, M., Zhu, W.-P., Wang, J.-Y., and Upadhyay, P. K. (2020). Outage Performance for Mixed FSO-RF Transmission in Satellite-Aerial- Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 32, 1349–1352. doi:10.1109/lpt.2020.3025452

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Michailidis, E. T., Nomikos, N., Bithas, P., Vouyioukas, D., and Kanatas, A. G. (2018). “Outage Probability of Triple-Hop Mixed RF/FSO/RF Stratospheric Communication Systems,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Satellite Space Commun. (SPACOMM), Athens, Greece, April 22–26, 2018, 1–6.

Google Scholar

Milas, V., Koletta, M., and Constantinou, P. (2003). Interference and Compatibility Studies Between Satellite Service Systems and Systems Using High Altitude Platform Stations. ESA Spec. Publ. 541, 34.

Google Scholar

Miura, R., and Oodo, M. (2001). Wireless Communications System Using Stratospheric Platforms: R and D Program on Telecom and Broadcasting System Using High Altitude Platform Stations. J. Commun. Res. Lab. 48, 33–48.

Google Scholar

Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Nam, Y.-H., and Debbah, M. (2019). A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 21, 2334–2360. doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2902862

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parthasarathy, S., Giggenbach, D., and Kirstädter, A. (2014). “Channel Modelling for Free-Space Optical Inter-HAP Links Using Adaptive ARQ Transmission,” in Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Networks X (International Society for Optics and Photonics), Amsterdam, Netherlands, 17 October 2014, 9248, 92480Q. doi:10.1117/12.2067195

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saleh Altubaishi, E., and Alhamawi, K. (2019). Capacity Analysis of Hybrid AF Multi-Hop FSO/RF System Under Pointing Errors and Weather Effects. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 31, 1304–1307. doi:10.1109/lpt.2019.2926679

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, M., Chadha, D., and Chandra, V. (2016). High-Altitude Platform for Free-Space Optical Communication: Performance Evaluation and Reliability Analysis. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 8, 600–609. doi:10.1364/jocn.8.000600

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, S., Madhukumar, A. S., and R., S. (2019). Switching-Based Cooperative Decode-And-Forward Relaying for Hybrid FSO/RF Networks. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 11, 267–281. doi:10.1364/jocn.11.000267

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shibata, Y., Kanazawa, N., Konishi, M., Hoshino, K., Ohta, Y., and Nagate, A. (2020). System Design of Gigabit HAPS Mobile Communications. IEEE Access 8, 157995–158007. doi:10.1109/access.2020.3019820

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singya, P. K., and Alouini, M.-S. (2021). Performance of UAV Assisted Multiuser Terrestrial-Satellite Communication System Over Mixed FSO/RF Channels. IEEE Trans. Aero. Electron. Syst. doi:10.1109/taes.2021.3111787

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singya, P. K., Kumar, N., Bhatia, V., and Alouini, M.-S. (2019). On Performance of Hexagonal, Cross, and Rectangular QAM for Multi-Relay Systems. IEEE Access 7, 60602–60616. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2915375

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singya, P. K., Kumar, N., Bhatia, V., and Alouini, M.-S. (2020). On the Performance Analysis of Higher Order QAM Schemes Over Mixed RF/FSO Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 69, 7366–7378. doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.2990747

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singya, P. K., Kumar, N., and Bhatia, V. (2018). Impact of Imperfect CSI on ASER of Hexagonal and Rectangular QAM for AF Relaying Network. IEEE Commun. Lett. 22, 428–431. doi:10.1109/lcomm.2017.2778153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swaminathan, R., Sharma, S., Vishwakarma, N., and Madhukumar, A. (2021). HAPS-Based Relaying for Integrated Space-Air-Ground Networks with Hybrid FSO/RF Communication: A Performance Analysis. IEEE Trans. Aero. Electron. Syst. 57, 1581–1599. doi:10.1109/TAES.2021.3050663

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trichili, A., Cox, M. A., Ooi, B. S., and Alouini, M.-S. (2020). Roadmap to Free Space Optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37, A184–A201. doi:10.1364/josab.399168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trichili, A., Ragheb, A., Briantcev, D., Esmail, M. A., Altamimi, M., Ashry, I., et al. (2021). Retrofitting FSO Systems in Existing RF Infrastructure: A Non-Zero-Sum Game Technology. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2, 2597–2615. doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3130645

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaiopoulos, N., Sandalidis, H. G., and Varoutas, D. (2013). Using a HAP Network to Transfer WiMAX OFDM Signals: Outage Probability Analysis. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5, 711–721. doi:10.1364/jocn.5.000711

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Cao, T., Guo, L., Wang, R., and Yang, Y. (2015). Performance Analysis of Multihop Parallel Free-Space Optical Systems Over Exponentiated Weibull Fading Channels. IEEE Photon. J. 7, 1–17. doi:10.1109/jphot.2015.2396115

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolframe (1998). The Wolfram Function Site. Available at: http://functions.wolfram.com/.

Google Scholar

Xu, G., and Song, Z. (2020). Performance Analysis for Mixed κ-μ Fading and M-Distribution Dual-Hop Radio Frequency/Free Space Optical Communication Systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 20, 1517–1528. doi:10.1109/TWC.2020.3034104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, G., and Song, Z. (2021). Performance Analysis of a UAV-Assisted RF/FSO Relaying Systems for Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, G., and Zhang, Q. (2021). Mixed RF/FSO Deep Space Communication System Under Solar Scintillation Effect. IEEE Trans. Aero. Electron. Syst. 57, 3237–3251. doi:10.1109/taes.2021.3074130

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Yuan, J., Liu, X., and Hasna, M. O. (2018). On the Performance of LAP-Based Multiple-Hop RF/FSO Systems. IEEE Trans. Aero. Electron. Syst. 55, 499–505. doi:10.1109/TAES.2018.2852399

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zedini, E., and Alouini, M.-S. (2015). Multihop Relaying over IM/DD FSO Systems with Pointing Errors. J. Lightwave Technol. 33, 5007–5015. doi:10.1109/jlt.2015.2492244

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zedini, E., Kammoun, A., and Alouini, M.-S. (2020). Performance of Multibeam Very High Throughput Satellite Systems Based on FSO Feeder Links with HPA Nonlinearity. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 19, 5908–5923. doi:10.1109/twc.2020.2998139

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zedini, E., Soury, H., and Alouini, M.-S. (2016). On the Performance Analysis of Dual-Hop Mixed FSO/RF Systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 15, 3679–3689. doi:10.1109/twc.2016.2524685

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhan, P., Yu, K., and Swindlehurst, A. L. (2011). Wireless Relay Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Performance and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 47, 2068–2085. doi:10.1109/taes.2011.5937283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Appendix

We have considered the Gamma-Gamma distribution for the atmospheric turbulence modeling of the ES-HAP FSO link and Meijer-G function is the prime element in the analytical expression. Hence, for asymptotic analysis, the meijer-G function must be approximated at high SNR which can be represented by the basic elementary form as (Wolframe, 1998, (07.34.06.0001.01))

Gc,da,bx|ϱ4ϱ3p=1axϱ4,pq=1qpaΓϱ4,qϱ4,pq=1bΓ1ϱ3,q+ϱ4,pq=b+1cΓϱ3,qϱ4,pa+1dΓ1ϱ4,q+ϱ4,p,(34)

where ϱ3 = [1, ϱ1] and ϱ4 = [ϱ2, 0]. As the power on the transmit SNR term decides the diversity order, the dominant term from (34) can be obtained as min(ϵ2r,αr,βr). Now considering the high SNR approximation of ϒ(m,x)x0xmm, the CDF and PDF of the Nakagami-m distributed RF link for the uth MU can be approximated as fγHMu(x)1Γ(mNt)(mγ̄U)mNtxmNt1 and FγHMu(x)1Γ(mNt)(mγ̄Ux)mNt, respectively. Substituting the approximate CDF and PDF expression in (23), the CDF expression of HAP-MU terrestrial link can be approximated as

FγHMAγth1ΓmNt+1Umγthγ̄UUmNt.(35)

From (35), it is observed that the diversity order of the RF link is U × m × Nt which directly depends on the number of terrestrial MUs (U), number of antennas (Nt), and RF link’s fading severity m. Finally, substituting (34) and (35) in (29), asymptotic outage probability for the considered system is obtained as (30).

Keywords: free-space optics, high altitude platform, gamma-gamma fading, pointing error, outage probability, average bit-error-rate

Citation: Singya PK and Alouini M-S (2022) Mixed FSO/RF Based Multiple HAPs Assisted Multiuser Multiantenna Terrestrial Communication. Front. Comms. Net 3:746201. doi: 10.3389/frcmn.2022.746201

Received: 23 July 2021; Accepted: 25 February 2022;
Published: 20 May 2022.

Edited by:

Steve Hranilovic, McMaster University, Canada

Reviewed by:

Guanjun Xu, East China Normal University, China
Milica Petkovic, University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Copyright © 2022 Singya and Alouini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Praveen Kumar Singya, praveen.singya@kaust.edu.sa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.