Corrigendum: The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century

McCarthy-Jones, Simon

doi:10.3389/frai.2021.672279

CORRECTION article

Front. Artif. Intell. , 15 April 2021

Sec. Technology and Law

Volume 4 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.672279

This article is part of the Research Topic Hammer or Telescope? Challenges and Opportunities of Science-oriented AI in Legal and Sociolegal Research View all 7 articles

Corrigendum: The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century

This article is a correction to:

The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century
1. Read original article

$\nSimon McCarthy-Jones$ Simon McCarthy-Jones^*

Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

A Corrigendum on
The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century

by McCarthy-Jones, S. (2019). Front. Artif. Intell. 2:19. doi: 10.3389/frai.2019.00019

An addition has been made to the Acknowledgments. The updated Acknowledgments statement appears below:

Acknowledgments

“The author is grateful to the two reviewers of this paper, as well as Richard Mullender, Brendan Kelly, Patrick O'Callaghan, and Roseline McCarthy-Jones, for their insightful comments on this manuscript. The author would like to acknowledge Ms. Susie Alegre for introducing him to the right to freedom of thought in international law as applied to contemporary technological developments, including the work of Vermeulen (2006), Bublitz (2014), Bublitz and Merkel (2014) and Boire (2001). This framework was applied in a separate analysis in Alegre (2017).”

The author states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

Alegre, S. (2017). Rethinking freedom of thought for the 21^st century. Eur. Hum. Rights Law Rev. 3, 221–233. Available online at: https://susiealegre.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Alegre%20from%202017_EHRLR_Issue_3_Print_final_0806%5B6745%5D.pdf

Boire, R. G. (2001). On cognitive liberty. J. Cogn. Libert. 2, 7–22. doi: 10.1016/S1297-9562(01)90048-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bublitz, J. C. (2014). Freedom of thought in the age of neuroscience. Archiv Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie 100, 1–25.

Google Scholar

Bublitz, J. C., and Merkel, R. (2014). Crimes against minds: on mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Crim. Law Philosophy 8, 51–77. doi: 10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vermeulen, B. (2006). “Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (article 9),” in Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th Edn, eds P. van Dijk, F. van Hoof, A. van Rijn, and L. Zwaak (Cambridge: Intersentia Press), 751–772.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: human rights, privacy, psychology, law, machine learning, big data

Citation: McCarthy-Jones S (2021) Corrigendum: The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century. Front. Artif. Intell. 4:672279. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.672279

Received: 25 February 2021; Accepted: 10 March 2021;
Published: 15 April 2021.

Edited and reviewed by: Radboud Winkels, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Copyright © 2021 McCarthy-Jones. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Simon McCarthy-Jones, cy5tY2NhcnRoeWpvbmVzQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Corrigendum: The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century

Acknowledgments

References

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good