Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Public Health, 17 December 2024
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic Infodemic Management in Public Health Crises View all 14 articles

Editorial: Infodemic management in public health crises

  • 1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 2Scientific Research Centre for Public Health, University of Vlore “Ismail Qemali”, Vlorë, Albania
  • 3Department of Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye

Editorial on the Research Topic
Infodemic management in public health crises

Infodemic, one of the major challenges of the 21st century, is defined as the information overload in digital and/or physical environments, including misinformation, disinformation, unchecked information, information voids, conspiracy theories, etc. Infodemic causes risk-taking behaviors that are harmful for health (1). Infodemic is not a new phenomenon, as human history has examples with different topics in different time periods (2, 3). On the other hand, public health crises make the communities more vulnerable to infodemic and this makes the situation more complex. A recent example has been the Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 pandemic has shown us how a public health crisis might have crashed the systems of the countries. The world has experienced that it was not only the pandemic itself but also many determinants of health, like social, structural, economical, commercial, and digital, concurrently influenced the course of the pandemic. Thus, the information ecosystem has been one of the major drivers of the burden. Infodemic has been a priority to be managed. In this regard, infodemic management has been developed as a systematic approach. Infodemic management is based on four pillars, including listening to community concerns and questions, facilitating to understand the risk, promoting to understand the advice of the health professionals, maintaining the resilience of the communities, and succeeding to engage and empower them to take intended and positive actions against infodemic.

For translating infodemic management into future generations, its pillars should be supported with evidence-based science to understand the causes of infodemic and to propose sustainable solutions to overcome the problems of today. Such initiatives will be helpful for predicting future risks and taking sustainable, evidence-based measures. At this point, research articles, perspectives, reviews, and opinions might have the potential to contribute to proposing solutions for the current and future crises at the global level. Such evidence is believed to play a crucial role in shaping future perspectives of infodemic management. Current evidence will also highlight the need for research gaps and capacity building on the Research Topic. The context of public health and health promotion provides the interdisciplinary feature of infodemic management.

Under this Research Topic, different aspects of infodemic and infodemic management have been tackled from the inter- and transdisciplinary features based on eight original research articles, two perspective articles, one study protocol article, one review, and one opinion article (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Research Topic collection: Infodemic management in public health crises.

Let us briefly emphasize the importance of the articles contributions to the Research Topic. Factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation among college students have been investigated by Shan and Ji from China. Their study emphasized the importance of complexity, dynamics, and differences in online susceptibility of the college students. Devi et al. from Singapore investigated the general population's trust levels in different stakeholders in COVID-19 information from different sources. They showed us that perceived risk of infection is associated with the trust level. Alzahrani from Saudi Arabia studied the impact of health beliefs and trust in health information sources on vaccine uptake. He emphasized the crucial role of targeting health beliefs of the community. Choi from the Republic of Korea performed a concept analysis on the COVID-19 infodemic. The study results might be helpful for the governments and health professionals for building up a policy in order to prevent infodemic. Öntaş et al. from Türkiye investigated the internet news sites to assess the opinions of health communication actors. Feng from China did research on the three dimensions of social capital at the theoretical level and provided empirical evidence for specific practices like improving the health literacy of the social media users. Infodemic types, including rumors in public health emergencies, were studied by Wang et al. from China. Liu et al. from China shared their qualitative research results. Perspective articles of the Research Topic contributed to widening the view and the scope in infodemic management during public health crises. Ebola outbreak in Uganda and the role of inaccessibility of social media data for infodemic management from the European Union widen our vision. The opinion article of the Research Topic gave us different examples of different social media platforms. Such examples are extremely helpful to be prepared for the next pandemic(s). One study protocol article in its pilot study phase written by authors with different backgrounds and institutions in the Research Topic has been a good example of a worldwide network of websites that could be used for effective and good communication. The systematic review article in the content has been a very significant example of how a systematic review can be conducted in the management of infodemic in health crises.

In the light of the above we feel that more steps should be taken to solve the infodemic problem at the global level. We are sure that public health crises' complexity makes everything worse and difficult. In this regard, scientific evidence is recommended to be conducted compatible with the pillars of infodemic management. Thus, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research teams have to study together to define the challenges and to propose solutions to be prepared for the next public health crises.

Unfortunately, public health crises are today's reality. They are also hot topics of the current century. Therefore, practical, reliable, and objective solutions should meet the needs of the Community. Science and scientific evidence will be the leading tools as they were in the past.

In conclusion, the Research Topic on Infodemic management in public health crises hopefully will tackle the recent needs and open a new vision for the readers. It provides valuable insights into managing health information during outbreaks like COVID-19. It emphasizes the importance of addressing infodemic, to better control disease spread. The studies highlight the role of social media platforms in shaping communication strategies for future crises including pandemics. By leveraging social capital, improving access to social media data, and learning from past health crises, the findings offer key strategies for enhancing infodemic management in future public health emergencies.

Author contributions

DA: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FK: Writing – review & editing. SY: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

The Research Topic editors would like to thank all the authors for their contributions to the Research Topic. We express our gratitude to all the contributing authors and peer reviewers who made this Research Topic possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. WHO. Infodemic. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1 (accessed November 26, 2024).

Google Scholar

2. Machado SH. 100 years later, little has changed in Brazil: disinformation and pandemic. Afr Health Sci. (2021) 21:1938–40. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.52

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Bandara NA, Jhauj R, Fernando J, Mehrnoush V, Wijesinghe N. Overlapping public health crises during the coronavirus disease pandemic. World J Emerg Med. (2021) 12:151–3. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.02.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: infodemic, infodemic management, public health, crises, evidence

Citation: Aslan D, Kamberi F and Yegenoglu S (2024) Editorial: Infodemic management in public health crises. Front. Public Health 12:1536378. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1536378

Received: 28 November 2024; Accepted: 30 November 2024;
Published: 17 December 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Christiane Stock, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Copyright © 2024 Aslan, Kamberi and Yegenoglu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dilek Aslan, ZGlhc2xhbi5kciYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==

ORCID: Dilek Aslan orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-2517
Fatjona Kamberi orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-9384
Selen Yegenoglu orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-8797

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.