Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Public Health, 25 September 2024
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Corrigendum: Effectiveness of myopia control interventions: a systematic review of 12 randomized control trials published between 2019 and 2021

  • 1Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (ESTeSL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • 2Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 4Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 5Joint Shantou International Eye Center, Shantou University/The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, China
  • 6Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
  • 7Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland

A corrigendum on
Effectiveness of myopia control interventions: a systematic review of 12 randomized control trials published between 2019 and 2021

by Lanca, C., Pang, C. P., and Grzybowski, A. (2023). Front. Public Health. 11:1125000. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125000

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 as published. The legend inside Figure 2 was incorrect. “Favours [control]” and “Favours [experimental]” were swapped. The corrected Figure 2 and its caption appear below.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plot of myopia progression (D) showing mean differences between treatment and control groups. The point estimate for the mean difference for each study is shown in gray color. The weight assigned to each study is represented by the size of each gray point estimate. The horizontal line through each gray point estimate shows the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference for each treatment. CL, contact lenses; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: myopia, progression, axial length, elongation, treatment, efficacy, systematic review

Citation: Lanca C, Pang CP and Grzybowski A (2024) Corrigendum: Effectiveness of myopia control interventions: a systematic review of 12 randomized control trials published between 2019 and 2021. Front. Public Health 12:1460156. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460156

Received: 05 July 2024; Accepted: 12 September 2024;
Published: 25 September 2024.

Edited by:

Harshad Thakur, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India

Reviewed by:

Azim Siraj Azimuddin, Ministry of Health, Brunei

Copyright © 2024 Lanca, Pang and Grzybowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andrzej Grzybowski, ae.grzybowski@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.