Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 30 September 2024
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Knowledge, attitude and practice towards physical activity among healthcare students at a public university in Saudi Arabia

Geetha Kandasamy
Geetha Kandasamy1*Mona AlmanasefMona Almanasef1Tahani AlmeleebiaTahani Almeleebia1Khalid OrayjKhalid Orayj1Lingala Kalyan Viswanath ReddyLingala Kalyan Viswanath Reddy2Eman ShorogEman Shorog1Asma M. AlshahraniAsma M. Alshahrani3Kousalya PrabaharKousalya Prabahar4Vinoth Prabhu VeeramaniVinoth Prabhu Veeramani4Palanisamy AmirthalingamPalanisamy Amirthalingam4Saleh F. AlqifariSaleh F. Alqifari4Rajalakshimi VasudevanRajalakshimi Vasudevan5Shaden Hamad AlSaediShaden Hamad AlSaedi6M. Yasmin BegumM. Yasmin Begum7Rehab AhmedRehab Ahmed8
  • 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Dawadimi, Saudi Arabia
  • 4Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
  • 5Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 6College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • 7Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 8Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

Objective: This research aimed to study the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward physical activity (PA) of healthcare students at King Khalid University in Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A prospective web-based cross-sectional study was carried out among healthcare students of King Khalid University from March to May 2024. The questionnaire contained questions on sociodemographic details, five questions about knowledge, eight questions about attitudes, and seven practice-related questions. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used.

Results: Out of the 383 participants, 175 (45.7%) were men and 208 (54.3%) were women. Most of the students, 292 (76.2%), had a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5–24.9. Among the 383, 264 (68.9%) showed good knowledge, 288 (75.2%) had positive attitudes, and 242 (63.2%) had satisfactory PA practice. Most of them, 310 (80.9%), were aware that “regular exercise helps promote strong bones and muscles.” Three hundred and fifty-two (91.9%) students believed that individuals who frequently engaged in PA had longer lifespans. More than half of the students (n = 239, 62.4%) engaged in the recommended level of PA. Of the students, 179 (46.8%) agreed that they planned to begin increasing their physical activity during the next 6 months. One hundred and fifty-six (40.7%) stated that they did sports with a high level of intensity for 20 min, three to five times a week, and 175 (45.7%) stated that they did moderate-intensity sports for 30 min, more than five times a week. None of the independent variables had a significant effect on good knowledge levels (p > 0.05). The regression results show being male OR = 0.473 (CI 0.285–0.783 p = 0.004), and being a first-or third-year student OR = 0.329 (CI 0.130–0.832 p = 0.013), OR = 0.276 (CI 0.100–0.762 p = 0.019) has a significant effect on positive attitude levels, while being male OR = 1.945 (CI 1.207–3.135 p = 0.006) and having a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 OR = 10.101 (CI 2.104–48.49 p = 0.004) has a significant effect on satisfactory practice levels.

Conclusion: The majority of participants in our study showed good knowledge and positive attitudes toward PA. A lower number of participants, though still the majority, had satisfactory levels of PA. Health education and health promotion initiatives should maintain and enhance knowledge of the positive effects of PA on health.

1 Introduction

Physical activity (PA) is a major factor in determining one’s level of physical fitness and health. PA is defined as any skeletal muscle-produced movement that requires energy expenditure (1). Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are medical conditions that are not caused by infectious agents and cannot be transmitted from one person to another. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), these diseases are characterized by their chronic nature and generally progress slowly over time. NCDs include cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes (2). PA is also known to prevent many of the world’s most common non-communicable diseases; healthcare students are taught about these diseases and the role PA plays in preventing them in their curriculum. Some healthcare students participate in various PAs every day, while others are unable or unwilling to do so for a variety of reasons, including lack of personal motivation, lack of access, health conditions, time management, cultural and social factors, and academic focus (3).

Recent studies have demonstrated the negative effects of physical inactivity on economies globally (46), which exacerbate the harm to the health and well-being of the general public. According to Guthold et al. (7), one of the biggest worldwide issues of 2016 was physical inactivity, putting over 1.4 billion people at risk of illnesses linked to it. Studies have continuously shown low levels of PA among the population, particularly in Saudi Arabia (811). According to the results of the most recent national survey carried out in 2019 by the Saudi General Authority for Statistics, 78% of Saudis were not engaging in PA (12).

Globally, inactivity is thought to be the cause of 9% of premature mortality, or over 5.3 million deaths each year (13). PA has a well-established history of lowering cardiovascular risks, improving lipid profiles, managing type 2 diabetes, preventing the occurrence of some malignancies, decreasing overall mortality, increasing psychological health and well-being, and increasing bone density (14). In 2013, the World Health Assembly decided to reduce insufficient PA globally by 10% voluntarily by 2025 (15). During their college years, people are more likely to face stress and time constraints, which may make it challenging for them to form healthy behaviors (16).

A few generations ago, Saudi Arabians led basic yet active lives. Back then, the physical demands of their hard jobs and everyday lives were enough to keep them at a suitable level of physical fitness and allow them to maintain a lean body mass (17). However, Saudi Arabia has experienced tremendous economic growth and affluence over the past few decades, along with a technological revolution that has significantly negatively impacted people’s lifestyles. Sedentary lifestyles, a diet high in calories, and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages has increased and spread throughout Saudi culture (18).

Studies show that people do not participate in PA frequently or for sufficient periods of time. This could be due to a variety of factors, including ignorance, and a lack of time, resources, and motivation (19). Furthermore, research on physical inactivity and its consequences in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is lacking (8). Hence, managing overweight and obesity may be aided by having the proper knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding frequent PA. Nonetheless, KAP is greatly impacted by family support, caregiving responsibilities, learning readiness, socioeconomic and cultural factors, and learning environment (20). So, the goal of this study was to investigate the current KAP toward PA among healthcare students at King Khalid University in Abha, Saudi Arabia.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design and study site

A prospective cross-sectional study (web-based survey) was carried out among King Khalid University students from March to May 2024.

2.2 Population criteria

Inclusion criteria: King Khalid University healthcare students (dentistry, pharmacy, medicine, applied health sciences, and nursing) were enrolled in the study. Informed consent was written in the Google form. It is mentioned that participation in this study is voluntary at any time they can withdraw without penalty. Completing the questionnaire will confirm that the participant agrees to participate in the study. Therefore, each participant was clear about participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Students from outside the university, people who did not complete their questionnaires and people who did not give their consent to participate in the study were excluded from the research.

2.3 Sampling procedure and sample size

Using a snowball sampling technique, study participants were selected and enrolled. Snowball sampling was chosen to enhance the study’s ability to reach and recruit healthcare students at various department effectively, leveraging their existing networks and connections to achieve a representative sample for the study. The survey was made with Google Forms and shared online through social media and other channels. Participants completed an online survey. The Raosoft online sample size calculator was used to calculate the sample size with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level of error. The overall number of healthcare students at KKU is approximately 1,250. To reduce the possibility of inaccurate results and improve the study’s reliability, a target sample size of n = 295 was determined. Overall, 421 participants initially responded, and 38 candidates were disqualified for incomplete information. The overall response rate of participants was 30.64%.

2.4 Questionnaire

The questionnaire was divided into four sections, the first of which asked questions about sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, year of study, and marital status. Body mass index (BMI), on the other hand, is used to assess an individual’s body weight relative to their height. There were five knowledge-related questions in Section 2, eight attitude-related questions in Section 3 (21, 22), and seven practice-related (23) questions in Section 4. The five knowledge questions had two possible scores: “correct” and “incorrect.” For knowledge, a correct response was valued at one mark, while an incorrect response was valued at zero. After combining them, the knowledge responses were evaluated. The knowledge score was further divided into low (≤3) or high (≥4) categories, as set out by Almutairi et al. (22).

A five-point Likert scale was applied to obtain responses about attitudes and practices. The participants were asked to rate their attitudes and practices on a scale of 1–5, with 5 denoting strong disagreement, 4 disagree, 3 neutral, 2 agree, and 1 strongly agree. The answers were gathered and assessed. The negative items were reverse coded (scoring range: 40–8, with 40 indicating the most positive attitude) and the total scores were calculated. Less than 60% were considered poor knowledge, negative attitude, and unsatisfactory practice, respectively. The Cronbach’s alpha test for the questionnaire’s general PA-related attitude questions was 0.73, and the questionnaire was validated in an earlier study (22).

2.5 Ethics approval

This research was approved by the King Khalid University Ethics Committee for the College of Pharmacy (HAPO-06-B-001; Approval No. ECM ≠ 2024-405).

2.6 Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics, a statistical tool for social sciences, version 21.0 for Windows, was used to conduct the statistical study. In the statistical analysis, both descriptive and inferential statistics were employed. The research participants’ sociodemographic data was characterized using frequency and percentages. To find out if there was a significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables, multivariable logistic regression analysis was done. Every test was two-tailed, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Descriptive results

Of the 383 participants, 208 (54.3%) were female and 175 (45.7%) were male. Out of the 383, 205 (53.5%) were between the ages of 18 and 20, 167 (43.6%) were between the ages of 21 and 25, and 11 (2.9%) were older than 25. In terms of marital status, the vast majority of the students, 356 (93%), were single, while 27 (7%) were married. Of the participants, 75 (19.6%) were first-year students, 73 (19.1%) were second years, 80 (20.9%) were third years, 83 (21.7%) were fourth years, and 72 (18.8%) were fifth years. In terms of body mass index (BMI), 22 (6.3%) were less than 18.5, 292 (76.2%) were between 18.5 and 24.9, 52 (13.6%) were between 25 and 29.9, and 15 (3.9%) were > 30. Details are in Table 1. The majority of participants, 264 (68.9%), showed good knowledge of PA, while 119 (31.1%) had poor knowledge. 288 (75.2%) had a positive attitude toward PA, while 95 (24.8%) had a negative attitude. 242 (63.2%) had satisfactory PA practice, while 141 (36.7%) had unsatisfactory PA practice. Details are provided in Table 2.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic details of study population.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Scores of knowledge, attitude and practice toward physical activity among the healthcare students of university.

3.1.1 Knowledge of PA

Of the 383 students, most of them, 310 (80.9%), were aware that “regular exercise helps promote strong bones and muscles.” 284 (74.2%) students concurred that obesity may be prevented with regular PA, and 269 (70.2%) were aware that engaging in regular physical activity lowers one’s risk of disease. 279 (72.8%) knew that exercise could help lower stress. According to 269 students (70.2%), sitting for longer than 2 h is harmful to muscles and bones. Details are provided in Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Knowledge toward physical activity among healthcare students of university.

3.1.2 Attitude toward PA

Three hundred and fifty-two (91.9%) students believed that individuals who frequently engage in physical activity had longer lifespans than those who do not. Three hundred and thirty-nine (88.5%) students agreed that PA is something that everyone should do. One hundred and thirty-seven (35.7%) students disliked participating in PA, 195 (50.9%) liked to participate in it, and 51 (13.3%) were uncertain. Of the students, 136 (35.5%) agreed that girls should not engage in physical exercise, 213 (55.6%) disagreed, and 34 (8.9%) were unsure. Three hundred and eight (80.4%) agreed that regular participation in PA makes them healthy. 346 (90.3%) believed that PA can be used to manage the increased likelihood of certain diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Three hundred and thirty-eight students (88.2%) reported that engaging in physical activity made them feel happy. Regular PA improves blood circulation, according to 346 (75.2%) students. Details are provided in Table 4.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Attitudes toward physical activity among healthcare students of university.

3.1.3 Practice toward PA

Over half of the students, 239 (62.4%), engaged in the recommended level of PA, with 79 (20.7%) not engaging in the recommended level, and 65 (17.0%) uncertain. Two hundred and forty students (62.4%) stated that they were unable to participate in physical exercise due to a medical condition. One hundred and ninety-nine students (52%) agreed that they exercised for enjoyment in addition to health benefits, 135 (35.2%) were unsure, and 49 (12.8%) disagreed. One hundred and seventy-nine students (46.8%) said they planned to begin increasing their physical activity during the next 6 months, compared to 133 (34.7%) who disagreed and 71 (18.5%) who were unsure.

One hundred and sixty-five students (43.1%) agreed with the statement “I get all the exercise I need from just doing normal activities,” 78 (20.4%) were unsure and 148 (38.6%) disagreed. One hundred and fifty-six students (40.7%) stated that they play sports with a high level of intensity (such as soccer, running, or aerobics) for 20 min, three to five times a week, 78 students (20.4%) were unsure, and 149 students (38.9%) disagreed. 175 (45.7%) agreed, 78 (20.4%) were unsure, and 130 (33.9%) disagreed that they do moderate-intensity sports (such as dancing, brisk walking, or light exercise) for 30 min, more than five times a week. Details are provided in Table 5.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Practices toward physical activity among healthcare students of university.

3.1.4 Multiple logistic regression analysis

3.1.5 Knowledge toward PA

When compared to the reference age group of over 25 s, the odds of having a good knowledge level decrease by approximately OR = 0.936 (CI 0.166–5.271 p = 0.940) and OR = 0.851 (CI 0.155–4.670 p = 0.853) for those between the ages of 18 and 20 and between 21 and 25, respectively. However, since p > 0.05, this difference is not statistically significant. Marital status-wise, single individuals are OR = 0.734 (CI 0.292–1.850 p = 0.513) times less likely to have good knowledge compared to married individuals (p = 0.05). Similarly, compared to females, males are OR = 0.898 (CI 0.564–1.429 p = 0.649) times less likely to have good knowledge about PA, but this difference is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). First-year students are OR = 0.928 (CI 0.386–2.236 p = 0.868) times less likely to have good knowledge, second-year students are OR = 1.337 (CI 0.565–3.164 p = 0.509) times, third-year students are OR = 1.791 (CI 0.784–4.091 p = 0.167) times, and fourth-year students are OR = 1.565 (CI 0.763–3.210 p = 0.0.222) times more likely to have good knowledge compared to fifth-year students, but this difference is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Compared to individuals with a BMI above 30 (obese), individuals with a BMI <18.5 are OR = 0.77 (CI 0.146–4.061 p = 0.758) times more likely to have good knowledge, those with a BMI of 18.5–24.9 are OR = 0.424 (CI 0.107–1.677 p = 0.221) times more likely to have good knowledge, and those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 are OR = 1.476 (CI 0.316–6.889 p = 0.621) times more likely, but this difference is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Among the independent variables, the regression results show that none of the variables have a significant effect on good knowledge levels. Details are provided in Table 6.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of sociodemographic variables association with knowledge, attitude and practice score.

3.1.5.1 Attitude toward PA

When compared to the reference age group of over 25 s, the odds of having a positive attitude level increase by OR = 1.235 (CI 0.133–11.468 p = 0.853) and decrease by OR = 0.716 (CI 0.078–6.550 p = 0.767) times for those between the ages of 18 and 20, and those between 21 and 25, respectively. However, since p > 0.05, this difference is not statistically significant. Marital status-wise, single individuals are OR = 0.385 (CI 0.121–1.222 p = 0.105) times less likely to have positive attitudes compared to married individuals (p > 0.05). Similarly, compared to females, males are OR = 0.473 (CI 0.285–0.783 p = 0.004) times less likely to have a positive attitude about PA and this difference is statistically significant (p < 0.05). First-year and third-year students are, respectively, OR = 0.329 (CI 0.130–0.832 p = 0.013) and OR = 0.276 (CI 0.100–0.762 p = 0.019) less likely to have a positive attitude (p < 0.05). However, second-year and fourth-year students are, respectively, OR = 0.520 (CI 0.190–1.426 p > 0.204) and OR = 0.476 (CI 0.206–1.102 p = 0.083) times less likely to have a positive attitude compared to fifth-year students (p > 0.05). Compared to individuals with a BMI above 30 (obese), individuals with a BMI <18.5 are 0.816 times (p = 0.870) less likely to have a positive attitude, those with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 are OR = 0.261 times (CI 0.031–2.179 p = 0.215) less likely, and those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 are OR = 0.494 (CI 0.053–4.573 p = 0.534) times less likely, but these differences are not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Among the independent variables, the regression results show that being male and being a first-or third-year student has a significant effect on positive attitude levels. Details are provided in Table 6.

3.1.5.2 Practice toward PA

When compared to the reference age group of over 25 s, the odds of having a satisfactory PA level increase by approximately OR = 7.304 and OR = 7.181 (CI 0.796–67.057 and CI 0.793–65.009 p = 0.079) times for those between the ages of 18 and 20, and 21 to 25, respectively. However, since p > 0.05, this difference is not statistically significant. Marital status-wise, single individuals are OR = 0.605 (CI 0.195–1.878 p > 0.385) times less likely to have satisfactory PA practice compared to married individuals (p > 0.05). Compared to females, males are OR = 1.945 (CI 1.207–3.135 p = 0.006) times more likely to have satisfactory PA practice. p < 0.05 indicates that this difference is statistically significant.

First-year students are OR = 1.137 (CI 0.470–2.748 p = 0.776) times more likely to have satisfactory practice, second-year students are OR = 1.152 (CI 0.494–2.686 p = 0.744) times more likely, third-year students are OR = 2.091 (CI 0.927–4.715 p = 0.075) times more likely, and fourth-year students are OR = 1.196 (CI 0.583–2.452 p = 0.625) times more likely to have satisfactory practice compared to fifth-year students, but these differences are not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Compared to individuals with a BMI above 30 (obese), individuals with a BMI <18.5 are OR = 4.388 (CI 0.743–25.901 p = 0.103) times more likely to have satisfactory PA practice, those with a BMI of 18.5–24.9 are OR = 10.101 (CI 2.104–48.49 p = 0.004) times more likely to have satisfactory practice, and those with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 are OR = 3.137 (CI 0.603–16.329 p = 0.174) times more likely. Among these BMI groups, only the 18.5–24.9 group is found to be significant (p < 0.05). Among the independent variables, the regression results show that being male and having a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 has significant effects on satisfactory PA levels. Details are provided in Table 6.

4 Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current KAP toward PA among healthcare students at King Khalid University of Abha, Saudi Arabia. The majority of participants, 264 (68.9%), showed a good understanding of PA, 288 (75.2%) had a positive attitude toward PA, and 242 (63.2%) had satisfactory PA practices. The study’s findings showed that although these students’ knowledge and attitudes toward physical exercise were generally good, their actual practices were less impressive than their knowledge and attitudes. In earlier research conducted in the U.S., 49.9% of students reported moderate to intense exercise, and 39.1% of respondents engaged in at least moderate activity (24, 25). Hence, compared to students in the United States, our study participants were more likely to engage in high levels of PA. Research by Moini et al. (26) and Sanaee et al. (27) revealed conflicting results with the present study, which could be clarified by the low level of PA knowledge, according to a review of the literature. According to another study, the majority of females had low knowledge (64%) and practice scores (72.2%), but they also had positive attitudes (75.1%) toward physical exercise (19). In this study, 36.8% of the subjects had poor practice results, suggesting that physical inactivity is quite prevalent among the participants. Furthermore, a high degree of physical inactivity was found in previous KSA-conducted research (17, 28). Undoubtedly, the rising prevalence of chronic diseases and physical inactivity can be attributed to the Saudi population’s changing lifestyle (29, 30). Exercise is a powerful tool for maintaining health and preventing illness. Increasing public awareness of the benefits of PA could help avoid obesity and chronic illnesses (31).

In our study, 33.9% of students were physically inactive: that did not do moderate-intensity sport for 30 min, more than five times a week (such as dancing, brisk walking, or light exercise). Only 40.7% stated that they played sports with a high level of intensity for 20 min, three to five times a week, while 38.9% stated that they did not. In another study, 31.8% (32) were found to be physically inactive. This variation may be related to the inclusion of university students, who tend to engage in less exercise due to their academic responsibilities. In a prior study, 31–51% of participants reported doing less than 2.5 h of PA per week (32).

The WHO recommends 60 min or more of moderate to intense physical exercise per day for adolescents, although the majority of teenagers worldwide do not meet this recommendation (33). The majority of students do not engage in daily PA at the suggested levels, according to this study. Only 44% of male adolescents and 20% of female adolescents in Saudi Arabia were found to be sufficiently active in a prior study (28).

A lack of understanding and practice patterns among children, teenagers, and adult Saudi subjects may also be reasons for the comparatively low level of physical exercise (3436). According to one study, Saudis do not engage in PA for a sufficient duration or at a consistently adequate level. This could be due to a variety of factors, including ignorance, and a lack of time, resources, and motivation (3740). In contrast to our findings, Ziari et al. (32) found that their participants’ knowledge of PA and attitude toward PA were significantly low. In order to promote PA on campus, it appears that the integration of implementation intentions with e-health platforms and the application of customized and comprehensive intervention models may prove sustainable (41, 42).

It is also important to recognize cultural norms and challenges to exercise, especially for college students, as well as approaches for encouraging exercise training, given the critical role that regular PA plays in human well-being. This is because future medical and paramedical students will be responsible for community care and health promotion. Therefore, more research is needed to ascertain the degree of PA and to provide students with promotional strategies for exercising. It appears that the following strategies can increase the amount of PA that students engage in daily: incorporating regular exercise regimens into curricula as mandatory course units; planning different sports events and classes in residences; providing guidance and education through educational programs; and offering suitable space with areas set aside for PA.

5 Limitations

The brief study period and the lack of anthropometric parameters in the questionnaire were two of the study’s limitations. To determine the KAP level, a self-reported questionnaire was also employed. The drawbacks of a cross-sectional survey study design include the lack of data on attitudes over time, the potential for recollection bias, and an inability to demonstrate causation. Because the snowball sampling strategy depends on recommendations to find participants, sample bias may arise.

6 Conclusion

The majority of participants in our study showed good knowledge and good attitudes toward PA, but a lower number of participants had satisfactory PA levels. Health education and health promotion initiatives should maintain and enhance knowledge of the positive effects of PA on health. Increased efforts are needed to improve KAP toward PA and to offer chances for regular, structured PA. It is advised to implement coordinated community and educational initiatives. Enhancing PA opportunities for students would require government and school-based policies to establish guidelines. In the future, health education campaigns must create awareness of PA in the student community. Collaboration with institutions and facilities will increase awareness of existing PA programs and help design campaigns. On-campus PA events such as fitness challenges, group exercise sessions, and health fairs can be conducted regularly to encourage participation and raise awareness.

7 Future implications

To raise awareness of PA among students, it is imperative that healthcare providers (HCPs) provide advice on future health education programs. HCPs collaborating with institutions and facilities will develop campaigns and raise awareness of the PA initiatives that are currently in place.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by this research was approved by the King Khalid University Ethics Committee (HAPO-06-B-001; Approval No. ECM ≠ 2024-405). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

GK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LV: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ES: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KP: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. VV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Supervision, Validation. PA: Investigation, Resources, Software, Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition. SA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. RV: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft. SA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Visualization. MB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. RA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through large group Research Project under grant number RGP2/226/45.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. WHO . WHO guidelines on PA and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization (2020) Available at: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/54/24/1451.long.

Google Scholar

2. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network . Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results (2020, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation – IHME). Available at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/.

Google Scholar

3. Sharma, S, Dhakal, I, and Chalise, S. Knowledge, attitude and practice on physical activities among undergraduate medical students of Devdaha medical college teaching hospital. J Univ Coll Med Sci. (2023) 11:54–7. doi: 10.3126/jucms.v11i02.58065

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Janssen, I . Health care costs of physical inactivity in Canadian adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2012) 37:803–6. doi: 10.1139/h2012-061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Min, JY, and Min, KB. Excess medical care costs associated with physical inactivity among Korean adults: retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010136

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ding, D, Lawson, KD, Kolbe-Alexander, TL, Finkelstein, EA, Katzmarzyk, PT, van Mechelen, W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. (2016) 388:1311–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Guthold, R, Stevens, GA, Riley, LM, and Bull, FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient PA from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1· 9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. (2018) 6:e1077–86. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Al-Hazzaa, HM . Physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia revisited: a systematic review of inactivity prevalence and perceived barriers to active living. Int J Health Sci. (2018) 12:50.

Google Scholar

9. Alahmed, Z, and Lobelo, F. PA promotion in Saudi Arabia: a critical role for clinicians and the health care system. J Epidemiol Glob Health. (2018) 7 Suppl 1:S7–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2017.10.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Althumiri, NA, Basyouni, MH, AlMousa, N, AlJuwaysim, MF, Almubark, RA, Bin Dhim, NF, et al. Obesity in Saudi Arabia in 2020: Prevalence, Distribution, and Its Current Association with Various Health Conditions. Healthcare (Basel). (2021) 9:311. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030311

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Alqahtani, BA, Alenazi, AM, Alhowimel, AS, and Elnaggar, RK. The descriptive pattern of PA in Saudi Arabia: analysis of national survey data. Int Health. (2021) 13:232–9. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. General Authority for Statistics , (2019). Bulletin of household sport practice survey 2019. Available at: https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/nshr_msh_mmrs_lsr_llryd_2019m-english.pdf (Accessed January 10, 2021).

Google Scholar

13. Lee, IM, Shiroma, EJ, Lobelo, F, Puska, P, Blair, SN, Katzmarzyk, PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. (2012) 380:219–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. World Health Organization (WHO) . Global recommendations on PA for health. Geneva: WHO (2010).

Google Scholar

15. World Health Organization (WHO) . Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs. 2013-2020. Available at: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-action-plan/en (Accessed January 10, 2016).

Google Scholar

16. Taha, AZ . Self-reported knowledge and pattern of PA among school students in Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. (2008) 14:344–55. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.97650

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Al-Hazzaa, HM . The public health burden of physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia. J Fam Commun Med. (2004) 11:45–51. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.97721

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Almahmeed, W, Arnaout, MS, Chettaoui, R, Ibrahim, M, Kurdi, MI, Taher, MA, et al. Coronary artery disease in Africa and the middle east. Ther Clin Risk Manag. (2012) 8:65–72. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S26414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Alandijani, AA, Alali, SY, Alotaibi, AS, Alsulami, AA, Alali, RA, Makkawi, RA, et al. Study of knowledge, attitude and practice of Saudi women towards physical activity. Egypt J Hosp Med. (2017) 69:1964–7. doi: 10.12816/0040630

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Habib, MA, Dey, M, Chowdhury, AI, Rahman, T, and Kundu, RK. Current knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) towards PA (PA) and its impact on obesity management in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. (2022) 5:e960. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.960

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Azrin Shah, AB, Aishath, N, Al Oran, HM, Hani Farhana, N, Azreena, MB, Fatima Dahiru, M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding healthy diet and PA among overweight or obese children. Int J Public Health Clin Sci. (2018) 5:254–66.

Google Scholar

22. Almutairi, N, Burns, S, and Portsmouth, L. PA knowledge, attitude, and Behaviours among adolescents in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia prior to and during COVID-19 restrictions. J Obes. (2022) 2022:1892017. doi: 10.1155/2022/1892017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kumar, K, Kumari, S, Kamboj, D, and Aggarwal, M. Knowledge, attitude and practices on physical activities among health care providers of a medical college in Haryana. J Pharmaceut Negat Results. (2022) 13:5054–9. doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S08.664

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Seo, DC, Nehl, E, Agley, J, and Ma, SM. Relations between physical activity and behavioral and perceptual correlates among midwestern college students. J Am Coll Heal. (2007) 56:187–97. doi: 10.3200/JACH.56.2.187-198

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dinger, MK, Brittain, DR, and Hutchinson, SR. Associations between physical activity and health-related factors in a national sample of college students. J Am Coll Heal. (2014) 62:67–74. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.849710

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Moeini, B, Jalilian, F, Jalilian, M, and Barati, M. Predicting factors associated with regular physical activity among college students applying BASNEF model. Avicenna J Clin Med. (2012) 18:70–6.

Google Scholar

27. Sanaee, NH, Delavari, A, Tavakkoli, R, Samadi, M, and Naghizade, MM. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards physical activity by one of Iran medical sciences universities personnel. J Military Med. (2009) 11:25–30.

Google Scholar

28. Al-Hazzaa, HM, Alahmadi, MA, Al-Sobayel, HI, Abahussain, NA, and AO, QDMM. Patterns and determinants of physical activity among Saudi adolescents. J Phys Act Health. (2014) 11:1202–11. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0427

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Al-Nozha, MM, Arafah, MR, Al-Mazrou, YY, Al-Maatouq, MA, Khan, NB, Khalil, MZ, et al. Coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. (2004) 25:1165–71. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020171

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Al-Hazzaa, HM . Physical activity, fitness and fatness among Saudi children and adolescents: implications for cardiovascular health. Saudi Med J. (2002) 23:144–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

31. Xu, F, Wang, X, Xiang, D, Wang, Z, Ye, Q, and Ware, RS. Awareness of knowledge and practice regarding physical activity: a population-based prospective, observational study among students in Nanjing, China. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0179518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179518

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ziari, A, Ziaeifar, E, Bozorgi, H, Taherian, J, Aghaee Masule, M, and Emadi, A. Physical activity; knowledge, attitudes, and practices of students living in Semnan University of medical sciences dormitories in Semnan, Iran. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. (2017) 4:e44743. doi: 10.5812/mejrh.44743

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. World Health Organization . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization (2010). doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3731-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Al-Zalabani, AH, and AA, A-HNAS. The prevalence of physical activity and its socioeconomic correlates in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional population-based national survey. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. (2015) 10:208–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.11.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. HM, A-RSAA-H . Physical activity profile of adult males in Riyadh City. Saudi Med J. (2001) 22:784–9. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17548.41600

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Al-Hazzaa, HM . Prevalence of physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia: a brief review. East Mediterr Health J. (2004) 10:663–70. doi: 10.26719/2004.10.4-5.663

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mandil, AM, Alfurayh, NA, Aljebreen, MA, and Aldukhi, SA. Physical activity and major non-communicable diseases among physicians in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. (2016) 37:1243–50. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.11.16268

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Al-Tannir, MA, Kobrosly, SY, Elbakri, NK, and Abu-Shaheen, AK. Prevalence and predictors of physical exercise among nurses. A cross-sectional study. Saudi Med J. (2017) 38:209–12. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.2.15502

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ansari, T, Alghamdi, T, Alzahrani, M, Alfhaid, F, Sami, W, Aldahash, BA, et al. Risky health behaviors among students in Majmaah university, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med. (2016) 23:133–9. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.189105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Alshaikh, MK, Filippidis, FT, Baldove, JP, Majeed, A, and Rawaf, S. Women in Saudi Arabia and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review. J Environ Public Health. (2016) 2016:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2016/7479357

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yuan, F, Peng, S, Khairani, AZ, and Liang, J. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of the efficacy of physical activity interventions among university students. Sustain For. (2024) 16:1369. doi: 10.3390/su16041369

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Peng, S, Othman, AT, Khairani, AZ, Zhou, Z, Zhou, X, Yuan, F, et al. Meta-analysis of implementation intentions interventions in promoting physical activity among university students. Sustain For. (2023) 15:12457. doi: 10.3390/su151612457

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: physical activity, university students, healthcare, knowledge, attitude, practice

Citation: Kandasamy G, Almanasef M, Almeleebia T, Orayj K, Viswanath Reddy LK, Shorog E, Alshahrani AM, Prabahar K, Veeramani VP, Amirthalingam P, Alqifari SF, Vasudevan R, AlSaedi SH, Begum MY and Ahmed R (2024) Knowledge, attitude and practice towards physical activity among healthcare students at a public university in Saudi Arabia. Front. Public Health. 12:1428165. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428165

Received: 05 May 2024; Accepted: 05 September 2024;
Published: 30 September 2024.

Edited by:

Jing-hong Liang, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Reviewed by:

Soukaina Hattabi, University of Jendouba, Tunisia
Kashica Webber-Ritchey, DePaul University, United States

Copyright © 2024 Kandasamy, Almanasef, Almeleebia, Orayj, Viswanath Reddy, Shorog, Alshahrani, Prabahar, Veeramani, Amirthalingam, Alqifari, Vasudevan, AlSaedi, Begum and Ahmed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Geetha Kandasamy, glakshmi@kku.edu.sa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.