A scoping review of olfactory interventions for fatigue relief: addressing occupational health hazards

Background: Fatigue poses risks to occupational health and safety, affecting individuals' work efficiency, physical health, and social security, as well as human wellbeing and quality of life. Olfactory interventions, due to their low interference, are considered promising strategies for mitigating fatigue and reducing occupational health hazards.

Objective: The objective of this review is to bridge the current gaps in the literature by conducting a scoping review of olfactory interventions on human alertness. It aims to explore their application in various occupational settings and to provide comprehensive and practical guidance for the practical application of olfactory interventions in mitigating fatigue and reducing occupational risks.

Methods: The literature research was conducted in English using electronic databases such as Web of Science. Keywords related to scent and fatigue and the review followed PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and PICO framework.

Results: 28 studies were included in this work. Participant characteristics, fatigue measurement methods, and scent intervention methods, such as types of scents, intervention strategies, and scent presentation systems, are thoroughly investigated and discussed. Additionally, the study places a specific emphasis on the applications and research within the field of scent interventions for fatigue driving. Olfactory interventions have been applied to populations in various occupational fields, demonstrating beneficial effects on both physiological and psychological fatigue.

Conclusions: Olfactory intervention is effective and promising for enhancing alertness and improving the occupational environment. To provide detailed and practical guidance for the actual application of olfactory intervention in fatigue relief and reducing occupational health and safety hazards, further research into the potential mechanisms, applications, and efficacy assessment systems of fatigue-related olfactory interventions is necessary.

1 Introduction

Extended work duration is associated with fatigue, which represents a significant occupational safety and health hazard. Fatigue affects both efficient work and physical wellbeing. Research indicates that fatigue can lead to respiratory issues, insomnia, depression, and isolation (1, 2). Additionally, chronic fatigue sufferers may be at risk of suicide (3). Fatigue also gives rise to occupational and societal safety issues, impacting people's overall wellbeing. Reviewing accident reports reveals that ~20% of aviation accidents are related to fatigue (4). Experts suggest that attributing 20%−30%of traffic accidents to driver fatigue is a conservative estimate (5). Surveys among healthcare workers, predominantly nurses, indicate that 19% believe fatigue contributes to the deterioration of patients' conditions (6).

Employing appropriate methods and techniques to alleviate fatigue and reduce occupational risks is crucial for enhancing occupational health and safety. Numerous studies have devised various strategies to prevent and alleviate fatigue, such as music (7, 8), temperature regulation (9, 10), light, and caffeine (11), among others. It is noteworthy that olfactory intervention, as a method to improve fatigue, has gained attention for its minimal interference with regular activities and work, making it a promising approach.

The sense of smell influences alertness and fatigue in humans through mechanisms such as emotional regulation, neural impact, cognitive influence, and physiological responses (12, 13). Emotional regulation refers to how certain odors can modulate one's emotional state, enhancing pleasure, reducing anxiety, and alleviating stress, thereby enhancing alertness and reducing fatigue. Neural impact refers to the interaction between odors and the sensory organs, which transmit signals to the brain and interact with the nervous system. Certain odors can stimulate neural activity and promote efficient neural transmission, thus enhancing alertness and reducing fatigue. Cognitive influence involves the association of specific odors with memories and experiences. When exposed to particular odors, relevant memories and experiences can be evoked, stimulating positive emotions and attention, thereby increasing alertness and reducing fatigue (14). Physiological responses occur when odors affect various physiological indicators in the body, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and brain waves (15, 16). Certain odors can modulate these physiological markers, promoting relaxation and recovery, thus improving alertness and reducing fatigue.

Although numerous studies have investigated the impact of odors on human alertness, there remains a gap in the literature, hindering the practical application of olfactory interventions in mitigating fatigue and reducing occupational risks. To address this gap, a scoping review was conducted to systematically map the research landscape in this area and identify any existing knowledge deficits. This study aims to explore the participant demographics, fatigue measurement methods, and types of intervention odors in current olfactory intervention research, particularly in occupational fields such as fatigue driving. It also discusses the trends in the development of fatigue detection methods and olfactory intervention methods, including scent intervention strategies and intervention strategies. By attempting to fill the gaps in the literature, this research aims to position odor as a novel strategy for preventing occupational health hazards, alleviating the occupational risks associated with fatigue, and protecting and promoting the wellbeing of workers worldwide.

2 Research methods

2.1 Literature search

This study was carried out in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (17). The literature research was conducted between January 5th and February 20th, 2024 on Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, BIOSIS Previews, SciELO Citation Index and Google Scholar. The selected articles were published between 2013 and January 2024 and were composed in the English language. The review also encompassed research in the field of traffic safety and relevant government websites. In addition, reference lists of identified articles were examined, and manual searches were conducted for conference proceedings to further enhance the research.

Conducting electronic database searches using the following keywords: scent, odor, olfaction, fragrance, aroma, flavor, smell, alertness, awareness, sleepy, fatigue and their relevant olfaction synonyms. The following combinations of keywords were employed in advanced searches across accessible databases:

A: TS = alertness AND (TS = fragrance OR TS = scent OR TS = odor OR TS = aroma)

B: (TS = sleepy OR TS = fatigue OR TS = tired OR TS = drowsiness) AND (TS = fragrance OR TS = scent OR TS = odor)

C: (TS = alertness OR TS = awareness OR TS = sleepy OR TS = fatigue) AND (TS = olfaction OR TS = smell)

D: (TS = alertness OR TS = fatigue OR TS = drowsiness) AND (TS = fragrance OR TS = scent OR TS = odor OR TS = aroma OR TS = perfume)

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

This study reviews relevant literature based on the PICO framework. In this research, the PICO elements are as follows:

P - Participants,

I - Intervention or Exposure = Any scent interventions or exposures,

C - Comparison or control group = No intervention or exposure in the study,

O - Outcome = increased alertness.

After removing duplicates, the two authors independently screened the studies based on the review criteria, following a two-step process: (1) screening based on titles and abstracts, and (2) full-text screening to determine the theoretical application, methodology, key findings, and discussion of the studies. In cases where there was any uncertainty regarding the inclusion of an article, the authors discussed and reached a consensus.

2.3 Data extraction and summarization

The complete reading of articles allowed us to extract data on: authors, years of publication, study locations, aims, designs, participants' characteristics, measurement methods, intervention strategies and main results.

Two reviewers independently extracted and collated data from each eligible article. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion between the two reviewers.

We summarized the populations, intervention strategies and study designs for each group, along with the measures used and broad findings.

3 Results

3.1 Article selection

The flow diagram (Figure 1) presents the results for each step. Before the screening, 235 papers were removed because they were duplicates, leaving 934 articles for later analysis. Based on the title and the abstract, 779 were excluded, with 155 full-text articles to be retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Of these, 133 were excluded for the following reasons: 11 were deemed unrelated to the subject, 49 did not provide sufficient information, 28 lacked a rigorous research design as they did not employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs), 18 used inappropriate measurement methods and failed to clearly present results through physiological, subjective, or behavioral methods, 9 had unconvincing conclusions due to a high level of speculation without empirical support, and 10 were not written in English. We excluded 8 studies because we were unable to retrieve them. The remaining 25 studies were considered eligible for this review. Following further examination of the citation lists in the articles, 3 additional papers were deemed to meet the criteria. In total, 28 articles met the criteria for this review.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flow diagram of literature selection.

3.2 Research on scent intervention on fatigue driving

In studies focusing on reducing occupational hazards through olfactory stimulation, one of the most prominent research areas is the impact of olfactory stimulation on fatigue driving. Odors can enhance driver alertness, effectively alleviate driver fatigue, mitigate occupational risks, and reduce the risk of traffic accidents. Detailed information on relevant studies concerning scent interventions for fatigue while driving is presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1. Studies on scent intervention for fatigue driving.

In terms of scent types, peppermint is considered popular and effective in enhancing driver alertness. A survey of 100 participants on the preference for three scents of peppermint, rosemary, and basil essential oils showed that peppermint was the most favored scent (18). Yoshida et al. found that peppermint, rosemary, eucalyptus and lemon scents can all maintain driver vigilance and prevent drowsy driving, with peppermint being the most effective (19).

Previous studies have reported different scent exposure strategies, including long-term vs. short-term exposure, continuous vs. intermittent exposure and exposure during driving vs. after fatigue. 12 participants underwent a 2-h simulated driving task under three conditions: (a) no peppermint scent, (b) short-term exposure to peppermint scent during the simulated driving task, and (c) long-term exposure to peppermint scent for three consecutive nights before the simulated driving task (18). The results showed that both short-term and long-term exposure to peppermint scent improved driver awareness, with no notable disparity in effectiveness between the two exposure conditions. Hirata conducted an experiment in a truck cab, measuring the characteristics of smell, investigating the time and interval of scent release during driving (20). The study found that the most effective method of releasing scents during driving was to release them for 1 min and then fluctuate the release interval between 5 and 9 min. After driver fatigue, a 30-s interval of peppermint scent ensured 16 min of wakefulness (19). It can be observed that the frequency and duration of scent exposure can affect the effectiveness of enhancing driver alertness.

3.3 Participants' characteristics

As shown in Table 2, the studies discussed in this paper cover a variety of participants, including individuals from different occupational backgrounds.

Table 2

Table 2. Studies on Scent Intervention for alertness.

The utilization of scent to enhance alertness and alleviate fatigue has not only found application within the transportation industry but has also played a pivotal role in mitigating work-related exhaustion among healthcare professionals. In a 6-week experiment involving exercise groups, lavender groups, and control groups, the results demonstrated the positive impact and fatigue-reducing effect of concomitant exercise and the fragrance of lavender within the operating room for surgical technologists (25). In the study conducted by Nasiri and Boroomand, a cohort of 80 shift-working nurses was subjected to random assignment, with participants divided into either a control group or an intervention group (26). The intervention group was administered a solitary drop of rosemary essential oil onto their masks. The research revealed that rosemary had the ability to diminish drowsiness and enhance alertness among shift-working nurses.

The research encompasses not only subjects in good physical health but also individuals with specific health issues. Aromatherapy, as an adjunct therapy, has been employed to treat various ailments, and research suggests that scents can alleviate fatigue in patients. Mahdavikian et al. conducted a study where scented cotton balls were applied to the collars of cardiac patients every evening at 9 p.m. for 20 min over a period of seven consecutive days (3). The study found that aromatherapy with peppermint and lavender essential oils could alleviate fatigue in cardiac patients. Starting from the second day of hospitalization, inhalation of three drops of citrus aurantium essential oil or a placebo through absorbable patches connected to an oxygen mask for a duration of 20 min was administered consecutively for 2 days (27). The experimental results showed that citrus aurantium essential aroma could alleviate feelings of anxiety and fatigue among patients diagnosed with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Aromatherapy encompasses not only inhalation of essential oils but also includes aromatherapy massage. Hur et al. proposed that inhalation of fragrances coupled with self-abdominal massage might contribute to controlling blood glucose levels, reducing fatigue, and improving sleep quality in middle-aged women with prediabetic conditions (28). It pointed out that inhalation aromatherapy is effective in alleviating fatigue in hemodialysis patients, but aromatherapy massage has a stronger impact on fatigue compared to inhalation aromatherapy (29).

Research indicates that aromas have the potential to alleviate physical exhaustion experienced during exercise. Tianlong and Sim conducted a study to investigate the impacts of four recovery methods, including aromatherapy, massage, static rest, and acupoint acupressure, on the concentrations of fatigue substances and stress hormones after boxing training (30). The study found that aromatherapy with essential oils utilizing essential oils emerged as the most efficacious approach in ameliorating fatigue and diminishing levels of stress hormones. 20 university students participated in a 30-min treadmill running session in a room scented with orange fragrance (31). The research showed that the aroma reduced fatigue during exercise and had a positive impact on exercise satisfaction and adherence for the participants.

3.4 Measurement methods

Table 3 provides information on alertness measurement methods, including physiological signal detection, task performance evaluation, and questionnaire surveys. Physiological signal detection methods primarily involve techniques such as EEG (16, 18, 34), heart rate (18, 32), heart rate variability (HRV) (22, 23, 38), as well as eye movement characteristics (19, 21, 33), and others. Task performance evaluation includes measurements such as reaction time (32, 33) and task error rates (33). Questionnaires commonly employed include the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) (18, 26, 35), Multi-dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) (25, 27), and Profile of Mood States (POMS) (15, 37–39, 42), among others. Fatigue detection methods for driving also include vehicle driving characteristics, such as steering wheel features (21).

Table 3

Table 3. Alertness measurement methods.

3.5 Types of scent

Analysis of the aforementioned studies reveals that various aromas, including herbal plants, fruits, flowers, wood, and food, have an impact on fatigue, as summarized in Table 4.

Table 4

Table 4. Types of scent.

Regarding the scent of peppermint, research findings indicate that it can enhance driver alertness (18) and alleviate fatigue in patients with heart disease (3). Peppermint-flavored chewing gum has been found to improve exam performance, alertness, and attention, thereby enhancing cognitive abilities (32). In the scenario of prolonged performance of repetitive tasks, the aroma of peppermint directly enhances the recollection of information in instances of participant fatigue and mitigates the deterioration of alertness. Intermittent exposure to peppermint aroma has a slightly stronger enhancing effect on alertness and memory compared to continuous exposure (33). The scent of peppermint has been found to alleviate tension induced by block-building tasks and contribute to maintaining participants' vitality (37).

The aroma of rosemary has been found to enhance driver vigilance (19, 26), improve alertness in shift nurses (26), and alleviate exercise fatigue in boxing training (30).

Studies have shown that the aroma of citrus fruits has various effects: citrus aurantium essential oil can alleviate anxiety and fatigue in myocardial infarction patients (27); orange scent can reduce fatigue during exercise (31); the aroma of sweet orange can also alleviate fatigue after playing with blocks (37). The scent of lemon can improve alertness and prevent driver drowsiness (35). Shiikuwasha (Citrus depressa Hayata) essential oil has demonstrated the capacity to increase vigor and reduce fatigue (34). Japanese citrus fruits iyokan (Citrus iyo) and yuzu (Citrus junos) have been shown to reduce feelings of fatigue, enhance mental vitality, and improve task performance (36).

For floral fragrances, research has shown that the scent of lavender can alleviate fatigue in surgical technicians (25) and reduce fatigue in cardiac patients (3). On the other hand, inhalation of michelia essential oil has been found to decrease alertness (16).

For woody fragrances, studies have indicated that the scent of eucalyptus can alleviate fatigue while driving (19). The scents of Taiwania have been found to induce relaxation and suppress negative emotional states, including fatigue, confusion and depression. They also result in higher scores in terms of stimulation, determination, excitement, activity, uniqueness and intensity, but lower scores in terms of pleasure (15). Essential oil from fir has been shown to have physiological and psychological relaxation effects, significantly improving positive emotions related to vitality and reducing negative emotions related to tension-anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, and fatigue (38). Women tend to experience a greater sense of warmth and brightness in woody environments, while changes in indoor environments are more likely to make women feel confused and fatigued, while men exhibit a noticeable sense of vitality (39).

The aroma of food and beverages can impact alertness. A study by Hawiset investigated the impact of inhaling coffee aroma on the mood, memory and salivary cortisol levels of healthy young volunteers (40). The study found that a one-time inhalation of coffee aroma could enhance working memory and increase alertness. Aromas resulting from the glycine/glucose Maillard reaction have demonstrated the ability to elevate mood and induce physiological relaxation by inhibiting sympathetic activity (42).

The studies also involved combinations of multiple aromas. Adding congruent odors in audiovisual simulation indirectly facilitated emotional recovery, alleviated fatigue, and modulated arousal levels (41). Inhalation of lavender, cinnamon, geranium, grapefruit, neroli, and ylang-ylang in a ratio of 6:3:3:3:1:3 was found to alleviate fatigue in prediabetic women (28). Inhalation of lavender and sweet orange was shown to reduce fatigue in patients undergoing hemodialysis (29).

4 Discussion

4.1 Psychophysiological explanations

The sense of smell is primarily mediated by two distinct yet interconnected sensory pathways: the olfactory and somatosensory (trigeminal) systems (43).

The trigeminal chemosensory system enables the perception of sensations such as freshness, burning, stinging, or tickling from odorous stimuli (44–46). This system functions through the specific interaction of chemicals with trigeminal chemoreceptors located on the fibers of the trigeminal nerve, cranial nerve V. This process operates independently of olfactory processing, which involves the activation of the olfactory nerve, cranial nerve I (47).

The olfactory system comprises an intricate network consisting of a sensory organ (olfactory epithelium) as well as specific olfactory brain regions (olfactory bulb and higher olfactory cortex) (48). The interaction between the olfactory system and the brain involves the processes of odor perception, activation of olfactory receptors, neural signal transmission, olfactory nerve transmission, olfactory bulb transmission, and olfactory cortex processing (49–52). Sensory information from olfaction could additionally be directed to more advanced associative regions like the orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, and hypothalamus. Research has found a close association between the neuroanatomy involved in olfaction and that related to emotional states, with several regions significantly overlapping in these two neuroanatomical circuits, such as the hippocampus, amygdala, and olfactory cortex itself (35). Therefore, through the sense of smell, it is possible to influence a person's emotions and states, and even enhance their alertness and alleviate fatigue.

Few scents produce purely olfactory or purely trigeminal sensations. The vast majority exhibit both odorant and irritant characteristics. The olfactory and trigeminal systems are closely linked and work in concert in the perception of odors (53).

Trigeminal odors directly influence sensory responses by stimulating the trigeminal nerve (the fifth cranial nerve), often accompanied by intense sensations. These odors are conveyed not only through the olfactory system but also via the trigeminal nerve, resulting in unique psychological and physiological reactions. Trigeminal odors can directly stimulate the trigeminal nerve, causing significant changes in physiological parameters such as heart rate and respiratory rate. For instance, capsaicin in chili peppers can induce physiological responses like heating and tearing through trigeminal stimulation, thereby enhancing arousal and attention (54). These odors typically evoke stronger sensations, such as tingling or burning, leading to more intense subjective experiences and emotional reactions through the activation of trigeminal nerve fibers. Studies have shown that menthol odor can improve alertness and cognitive performance while reducing fatigue (55), likely due to the cooling effect and strong sensory stimulation of menthol.

Non-trigeminal odors, such as floral and fruity scents, are primarily transmitted through the olfactory epithelium, activating the olfactory bulb and associated brain regions. These odors typically do not accompany sensations of irritation but influence emotional and cognitive responses through their aromatic properties. Non-trigeminal odors can modulate physiological parameters like heart rate and skin conductance by regulating nervous system activity. For instance, floral scents such as lavender have been shown to reduce stress, enhance relaxation, and improve sleep quality (56). These effects are mediated by the modulation of the autonomic nervous system and cortisol levels. Psychologically, non-trigeminal odors convey information via olfactory receptors, eliciting emotional and memory responses through the olfactory system.

Psychological hypotheses suggest that odor functions through affective learning, conscious perception, and belief/expectation. At the core of psychological hypotheses is the assertion that responses to odors are acquired through their association with emotional experiences, thereby imbuing odors with affective characteristics and exerting consistent effects on emotions, cognition, behavior, and physiology (57).

Odors exhibit high correlation and emotional arousal, consistent with the neuroanatomy of the limbic system. Odors can influence emotions (58). Pleasant odors can induce positive emotions, while unpleasant odors can evoke negative emotions (14).

Odors evoke memories associated with our past. Compared to signals sent to other sensory channels, much research has focused on the ability of odor signals to evoke autobiographical memories. Herz demonstrated that memories triggered by odors are considered to be more emotional compared to memories evoked by other types of stimuli (59). Thus, when we experience a particular odor and associate it with a specific emotional experience in our memory, it can evoke related emotions when encountered later (14).

Beliefs and expectations also have a significant impact on the outcomes of odor interventions. The results of a study by Campenni et al. showed that in the case of odorless placebos, physiological changes related to relaxation or stimulation could be induced solely through suggestion (60). Knasko also observed that suggesting the presence of a pleasant odor in a room (even when none was present) had positive effects on mood (61). These findings suggest that the chemical nature of the odor itself plays a secondary role in the emotional and subjective changes that occur in the presence of odor, and it is the meaning of the odor that triggers the subsequent psychological and/or physiological responses.

Overall, the research provides a physiological and psychological theoretical foundation for the application of scents in enhancing alertness, alleviating fatigue, and consequently reducing occupational health and safety hazards.

4.2 Scent intervention on fatigue driving

As a means to alleviate driving fatigue and reduce occupational health and safety hazards, the use of fragrance can effectively reduce the occurrence of traffic accidents, thereby improving road safety.

Research on the application of olfactory stimulation has also extended to the field of autonomous driving. In an effort to measure the influence of olfactory stimulation and takeover modality on takeover performance in conditional automated driving, Tang et al. observed that the peppermint odor as an auxiliary stimulation of auditory and tactile takeover requests improved takeover quality, as measured by Time to collision, longitudinal acceleration, lateral acceleration, and overshoot (22).

Scents have been found to exert an impact on the psychological state of drivers, and thereby affect their work performance. In a two-week experimental study involving 120 taxi drivers, it was observed that aromas can improve passenger mood and facilitate smoother driver-passenger communication. This had the effect of reducing driver tension, elevating their sense of pleasure, and ultimately boosting job satisfaction (62). Scent has the power to alter the driving behavior of individuals. Specifically, in a simulated driving experiment, the scent of peppermint was found to reduce the aggressive driving tendencies of participants (63).

Several studies have compared the effects of olfactory stimulation with visual and auditory stimulation on drivers. Bordegoni et al. conducted experiments to investigate whether olfactory stimulation could affect drivers' cognitive performance and found that olfactory stimulation had a better effect on improving drivers' attention than auditory stimulation (23). Additionally, during driving, olfactory stimulation had a masking effect on auditory stimulation (64). Dmitrenko et al. explored the application of peppermint, lavender and lemon scents in conveying three driving-related messages, and the study found that olfactory cues were less distracting than visual cues, allowing drivers to feel more comfortable and be more effective, while also making fewer errors (65). It appears that olfactory cues can affect the driver's psychological state, which in turn affects their work state.

4.3 Gender difference

Some studies have focused on either male or female participants, while others have included individuals of different genders. Research has shown that the impact of the same odor can vary between different genders (38). Shen et al. found that in a woody environment, women experienced fatigue while men felt more vitality (39). Studies have indicated that olfactory abilities differ based on gender (66, 67). Generally, women have a heightened sense of smell (68, 69), stronger scent identification skills (66), and greater olfactory potential compared to men (67). Oliveira-Pinto et al. discovered significant gender differences in the absolute number of cells in both neural and non-neural cells in the human olfactory bulb (70). Women had 43% more cells in the olfactory center of the brain and 50% more neurons, which are related to olfaction control. Therefore, due to physiological differences, the perception of odors can differ between genders, influencing the effects of odors on alertness enhancement. Gender factors should not be overlooked in studies investigating odor interventions for fatigue.

4.4 Measurement methods

Fatigue, as investigated in the studies, encompasses both physiological fatigue, such as exercise-induced fatigue and fatigue caused by work-related tasks, as well as psychological fatigue, often involving a combination of physiological and psychological aspects. Consequently, a comprehensive assessment of alertness is conducted through various methods, including physiological signal detection, task performance evaluation, and questionnaire surveys. Furthermore, many studies explore a combination of multiple indicators to assess alertness, rather than relying solely on a single fatigue indicator.

Fatigue is a complex psychological and physiological state, and the choice of fatigue identification methods should consider research and application scenarios, taking into account accuracy and low interference.

4.5 Scent intervention methods

4.5.1 Scent presentation system

The effectiveness of scent intervention in fatigue management is closely related to the scent presentation system. The scent presentation system consists of two technical domains: scent generation and scent delivery.

Odor generation is determined by the use of odorants. Typically, odorants are in liquid form and are encapsulated, gelled, or impregnated into porous materials. Various methods can be employed to release odorant molecules based on their molecular forms, including natural evaporation, airflow-based volatilization, heating, airflow-based nebulization, direct nebulization-piezoelectric method, and ultrasonic nebulization.

Based on the location of odor-generation devices, there are two main types of scent presentation systems. One type is the fixed type, where scent generators are integrated into the surroundings. The other type is the portable type, where scent generators are attached to the body. The advantage of wearable devices is that the scent can be stably presented to the user. However, devices may interfere with occupational activities, potentially compromising safety.

Multiple aroma delivery technologies can be employed for fixed odor presentation systems, including natural diffusion, airflow, vortex rings, and tubes. Natural diffusion refers to the simple and uncontrolled spreading of scent in the air, such as with independent scent generators. Airflow refers to the transportation of scent carried by the air conditioning system. Vortex ring refers to the scent being carried by a vortex ring without diffusion, as the vortex maintains its shape. Funato et al. proposed that the vortex ring is the most suitable method for odor transmission and tested the stimulating effect of fragrance on drivers and its effective duration using the vortex ring method (21). Tubes refer to the scent being carried through a duct-like structure. These methods are suitable for installation in vehicles such as automobiles. Funato et al. conducted experiments to compare the aforementioned scent transmission techniques, and the results are presented in Table 5.

Table 5

Table 5. Comparison of aroma delivery methodologies (21).

Hirata conducted experiments and discovered the characteristic of olfactory fatigue, where the perceived intensity of odor rapidly increases upon odor release and then decreases due to fatigue (20). Based on the above analysis, it is evident that a fatigue intervention scent delivery system that does not interfere with occupational activities ensures safety, is easy to install and maintain, provides intermittent odor release, and is cost-effective, is the inevitable trend for the application of odor-based fatigue interventions in occupational environments.

4.5.2 Scent intervention strategies

In the relevant studies, scent intervention strategies can be classified based on their intervention timing. There are pre-task interventions, where participants are exposed to scents for consecutive nights prior to the experiment (18). There are concurrent task interventions, where tasks are performed in an environment with scents present (31). There are also post-fatigue interventions, where drivers are subjected to scent interventions when experiencing fatigue (19). In terms of intervention duration, there are continuous exposure and intermittent exposure (19). Scent interventions can take the form of direct and indirect interventions. Direct interventions involve odor delivery through odor presentation systems. Indirect interventions include methods such as chewing flavored gum (32). Overall, considering the fatiguing nature of olfaction (20), intermittent scent release and low task interference scent intervention strategies are more suitable for practical applications.

Based on the reviewed studies, it is evident that peppermint fragrance has shown promising effects in alleviating fatigue. Moreover, there is an increasing trend in exploring the use of other fragrances such as citrus for enhancing alertness. Furthermore, fatigue alleviation measures are not limited to single scent interventions alone. Combining scents with other measures, such as combining scent with physical exercise, is also a research trend. Different strategies can work synergistically, with the positive effects of different strategies enhancing and even strengthening each other.

4.6 Limitations

One limitation of this review is that it did not include a search of non-English electronic databases, which may introduce a language bias (71). Considering the multiple influencing factors involved in scent intervention research, such as task variations, scent presentation techniques, environmental factors, and individual physiological differences among participants, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation system that can effectively consider these factors and measure the effectiveness of scent's impact on alertness in various studies.

5 Conclusions

Fatigue is a prevalent issue in contemporary society, affecting people's work efficiency and occupational health and safety. Research has shown that olfaction can significantly impact human alertness and fatigue through mechanisms including emotional regulation, neural influences, cognitive effects, and physiological responses. The scent, owing to its minimal interference, has garnered significant attention and is considered a promising avenue for mitigating fatigue. Our study aims to conduct a scoping review on the effects of olfactory interventions on human alertness while exploring their applications in different occupational settings. Our overarching goal is to bridge the existing gaps in the literature, ultimately offering valuable guidance for potential systematic reviews.

This review places particular emphasis on research within the domain of olfactory interventions for fatigue driving. It delves into various aspects, including participants' characteristics, measurement methods, and intervention methods. Most of the studies reviewed indicate that olfactory interventions have a positive impact on human alertness, demonstrating significant potential as an effective strategy for preventing occupational health hazards. This provides detailed and practical guidance for the actual application of olfactory interventions in alleviating fatigue and reducing occupational risks.

In order to provide detailed and practical guidance for the actual application of olfactory interventions in improving the occupational environment and reducing occupational risks, further research is needed to investigate the potential mechanisms, applications, and efficacy evaluation systems specific to fatigue olfactory interventions.

Author contributions

XJ: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. KM: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XF: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Nasiri M, Rahimian B, Jahanshahi M, Fotoukian Z, Motamed Omran Chaboki A. Study of fatigue and associated factors in patients with chronic heart failure. J Crit Care Nurs. (2016) 9:e8124. doi: 10.17795/ccn-8124

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Elliott JL, Lal S. Blood pressure, sleep quality and fatigue in shift working police officers: effects of a twelve hour roster system on cardiovascular and sleep health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020172

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mahdavikian S, Fallahi M, Khatony A. Comparing the effect of aromatherapy with peppermint and lavender essential oils on fatigue of cardiac patients: a randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2021) 2021:9925945. doi: 10.1155/2021/9925945

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hartzler BM. Fatigue on the flight deck: the consequences of sleep loss and the benefits of napping. Accid Analy Prevent. (2014) 62:309–18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nazari SSH, Moradi A, Rahmani K, A. systematic review of the effect of various interventions on reducing fatigue and sleepiness while driving. Chin J Traumatol. (2017) 20:249–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.03.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Barger LK, Ayas NT, Cade BE, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, et al. Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. PLoS Med. (2006) 3:e487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sheibani N, Zakerian SA, Alimohammadi I, Azam K, Pirposhteh EA. The effect of listening to iranian pop and classical music, on mental and physiological drowsiness. Sleep Biol Rhythms. (2022) 20:275–85. doi: 10.1007/s41105-021-00369-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li R, Chen YV, Zhang LH. Effect of music tempo on long-distance driving: which tempo is the most effective at reducing fatigue? Iperception. (2019) 10:2041669519861982. doi: 10.1177/2041669519861982

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schmidt E, Bullinger AC. Mitigating passive fatigue during monotonous drives with thermal stimuli: Insights into the effect of different stimulation durations. Accid Anal Prev. (2019) 126:115–21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schmidt E, Decke R, Rasshofer R, Bullinger AC. Psychophysiological responses to short-term cooling during a simulated monotonous driving task. Appl Ergon. (2017) 62:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Soleimanloo SS, Garcia-Hansen V, White MJ, Huda MM, Smith SS. Bright light alone or combined with caffeine improves sleepiness in chronically sleep-restricted young drivers. Sleep Med. (2022) 93:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.03.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kontaris I, East BS, Wilson DA. Behavioral and neurobiological convergence of odor, mood and emotion: a review. Front Behav Neurosci. (2020) 14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Herz RS. Aromatherapy facts and fictions: a scientific analysis of olfactory effects on mood, physiology and behavior. Int J Neurosci. (2009) 119:263–90. doi: 10.1080/00207450802333953

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Epple G, Herz RS. Ambient odors associated to failure influence cognitive performance in children. Dev Psychobiol. (1999) 35:103–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Yu CP, Weng WC, Ramanpong J, Wu CD, Tsai MJ, Spengler JD. Physiological and psychological responses to olfactory simulation by taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides) essential oil and the influence of cognitive bias. J Wood Sci. (2022) 68:12. doi: 10.1186/s10086-022-02021-w

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Koomhin P, Sattayakhom A, Chandharakool S, Sinlapasorn J, Suanjan S, Palipoch S. Na-ek P, Punsawad C, Matan N. Michelia essential oil inhalation increases fast alpha wave activity. Scientia Pharmaceutica. (2020) 88:23. doi: 10.3390/scipharm88020023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Prisma extension for scoping reviews (prisma-scr): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. (2018) 169:467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pujiartati DA, Yassierli FA. Effects of long exposures of peppermint aroma on awareness in simulated driving. Ind Eng Manag Syst. (2019) 18:692–700. doi: 10.7232/iems.2019.18.4.692

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yoshida M, Kato C, Kawasumi M, Yamasaki H, Yamamoto S, Nakano T, Yamada M. Study on stimulation effects for driver based on fragrance presentation. In: MVA2011 IAPR Conference on Machine Vision Applications13-15 Jun. Nara: MVA2011 (2011). p. 332-335.

Google Scholar

20. Hirata Y, A. study of the effective way to release scent to maintain alertness. JSAE Rev. (2001) 22:331–6. doi: 10.1016/S0389-4304(01)00105-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Funato H, Yoshikawa M, Kawasumi M, Yamamoto S, Yamada M, Yanagida Y. Stimulation effects provided to drivers by fragrance presentation considering olfactory adaptation. In: 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium3-5 Jun. Xi'an: IEEE (2009) p. 881–886.

Google Scholar

22. Tang Q, Guo G, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Wu Y. Olfactory facilitation of takeover performance in highly automated driving. Hum Factors. (2021) 63:553–64. doi: 10.1177/0018720819893137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bordegoni M, Carulli M, Shi Y. Investigating the use of smell in vehicle-driver interaction. In: ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference21-24 Aug. Charlotte, North Carolina: 36th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. (2016).

Google Scholar

24. Jiang X, Muthusamy K, Ainarappan N. Study on peppermint scent interventions for fatigue driving. In: 2023 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS) Kaunas: IEEE (2023). p. 80–84.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

25. Akhule OZ, Nasiri E, Lotfi M, Mahmoodi A, Akbari H. The effect of concomitant exercise and inhalation of lavender fragrance on surgical technologists' fatigue severity. J Health Safety Work. (2021) 11:7–10.

Google Scholar

26. Nasiri A, Boroomand MM. The effect of rosemary essential oil inhalation on sleepiness and alertness of shift-working nurses: A randomized, controlled field trial. Complem Therap Clini Pract. (2021) 43:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Shirzadegan R, Gholami M, Hasanvand S, Beiranvand A. The effects of citrus aurantium aroma on anxiety and fatigue in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a two -center, randomized, controlled trial. J Herbal Med. (2020) 21:100326. doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2019.100326

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hur MH, Hong JH, Yeo S. Effects of aromatherapy on stress, fructosamine, fatigue, and sleep quality in prediabetic middle-aged women: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Integr Med. (2019) 31:100978. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2019.100978

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Varaei S, Jalalian Z, Yekani Nejad MS, Shamsizadeh M. Comparison the effects of inhalation and massage aromatherapy with lavender and sweet orange on fatigue in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Complement Integr Med. (2020) 18:193–200. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2018-0137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Tianlong D, Sim YJ. Effects of different recovery methods on postboxing sparring fatigue substances and stress hormones. J Exerc Rehabilitat. (2019) 15:258–63. doi: 10.12965/jer.1938050.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kwon S, Ahn J, Jeon H. Can aromatherapy make people feel better throughout exercise? Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:4559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Anu S, Jeyashree K, Vishnuvarthini SN, Venkatesh NP, Anto JV. Effect of mint flavoured chewing gum in observing changes in cognitive function while assessing test performance-an interventional study. J Clini Diag Res. (2022) 16:6–10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53795.16435

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lwin MO, Malik S, Neo JRJ. Effects of scent and scent emission methods: Implications on workers' alertness, vigilance, and memory under fatigue conditions. Environ Behav. (2021) 53:987–1012. doi: 10.1177/0013916520940804

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Asikin Y, Haga E, Shimizu K, Kusano M, Oku H, Wada K. Stress amelioration potentials of shiikuwasha (citrus depressa hayata) essential oil. Ann Nutr Metabol. (2019) 75:140. doi: 10.1159/000501751

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Martial C, Poirrier AL, Pottier L, Cassol H, Mortaheb S, Panda R, et al. From nose to brain: the effect of lemon inhalation observed by whole brain voxel to voxel functional connectivity. Cortex. (2023) 165:119–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ohata M, Zhou L, Ando S, Kaneko S, Osada K, Yada Y. Application of integrative physiological approach to evaluate human physiological responses to the inhalation of essential oils of japanese citrus fruits iyokan (citrus iyo) and yuzu (citrus junos). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. (2022) 86:109–16. doi: 10.1093/bbb/zbab193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pan Y, Koyama S, Nagase A, Ono K, Watanabe M. The effects of aroma on product experience - analyzing the product experience of the toy blocks with different aromas. Int J Affect Eng. (2020) 19:1–10. doi: 10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-18-00036

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Kim C, Song C. Physiological and psychological relaxation effects of fir essential oil on university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:5063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shen J, Zhang X, Lian Z. Gender differences in human psychological responses to wooden indoor environment. Eur Wood Wood Prod. (2021) 79:217–26. doi: 10.1007/s00107-020-01561-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hawiset T. Effect of one time coffee fragrance inhalation on working memory, mood, and salivary cortisol level in healthy young volunteers: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Integrat Med Res. (2019) 8:273–8. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2019.11.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sona B, Dietl E, Steidle A. Recovery in sensory-enriched break environments: Integrating vision, sound and scent into simulated indoor and outdoor environments. Ergonomics. (2019) 62:521–36. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1491643

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ohata M, Zhou L, Yada Y, Yokoyama I, Arihara K. 2,3-dimethylpyrazine (3dp) and 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2h)-furanone (dmhf) generated by the maillard reaction in foods affect autonomic nervous activity and central nervous activity in human. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. (2020) 84:1894–902. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1775066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jacquot L, Monnin J, Brand G. Influence of nasal trigeminal stimuli on olfactory sensitivity. C R Biol. (2004) 327:305–11. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.02.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav. (1978) 20:175–85. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(78)90070-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Laska M, Distel H, Hudson R. Trigeminal perception of odorant quality in congenitally anosmic subjects. Chem Senses. (1997) 22:447–56. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.4.447

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Frasnelli J, Albrecht J, Bryant B, Lundström J. Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists. Neuroscience. (2011) 189:377–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Tremblay C, Frasnelli J. Olfactory and trigeminal systems interact in the periphery. Chem Senses. (2018) 43:611–6. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjy049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Sowndhararajan K, Kim S. Influence of fragrances on human psychophysiological activity: With special reference to human electroencephalographic response. Sci Pharm. (2016) 84:724–51. doi: 10.3390/scipharm84040724

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Strous RD, Shoenfeld Y. To smell the immune system: Olfaction, autoimmunity and brain involvement. Autoimmun Rev. (2006) 6:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.07.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Breer H. Sense of smell: Recognition and transduction of olfactory signals. Biochem Soc Trans. (2003) 31:113–6. doi: 10.1042/bst0310113

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Benarroch EE. Olfactory system: functional organization and involvement in neurodegenerative disease. Neurology. (2010) 75:1104–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f3db84

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Cleland T, Linster C. Central olfactory processing. In: Handbook of Olfaction (2023). p. 165–180.

Google Scholar

53. Hummel T, Livermore A. Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. (2002) 75:305–13. doi: 10.1007/s00420-002-0315-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Kono Y, Kubota A, Taira M, Katsuyama N, Sugimoto K. Effects of oral stimulation with capsaicin on salivary secretion and neural activities in the autonomic system and the brain. J Dental Sci. (2018) 13:116–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.08.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Raudenbush B, Grayhem R, Sears T, Wilson I. Effects of peppermint and cinnamon odor administration on simulated driving alertness, mood and workload. N Am J Psychol. (2009) 11:245–56.

Google Scholar

56. Lehrner J, Marwinski G, Lehr S, Johren P, Deecke L. Ambient odors of orange and lavender reduce anxiety and improve mood in a dental office. Physiol Behav. (2005) 86:92–5. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Herz RS, Beland SL, Hellerstein M. Changing odor hedonic perception through emotional associations in humans. Int J Comparat Psychol. (2004) 17:315–38. doi: 10.46867/IJCP.2004.17.04.05

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Vernet-Maury E, Alaoui-Ismaili O, Dittmar A, Delhomme G, Chanel J. Basic emotions induced by odorants: a new approach based on autonomic pattern results. J Auton Nerv Syst. (1999) 75:176–83. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1838(98)00168-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Herz RS. A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli. Chem Senses. (2004) 29:217–24. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Campenni CE, Crawley EJ, Meier ME. Role of suggestion in odor-induced mood change. Psychol Rep. (2004) 94:1127–36. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1127-1136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Knasko SC. Pleasant odors and congruency: effects on approach behavior. Chem Senses. (1995) 20:479–87. doi: 10.1093/chemse/20.5.479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Seo Y, Kim S, Jeong S, Lee D, Choi J. Effect of aroma therapy on the stress alleviation and job satisfaction of taxi drivers. J Forest Environm Sci. (2020) 36:318–25. doi: 10.7747/JFES.2020.36.4.318

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Moss M, Ho J, Swinburne S, Turner A. Aroma of the essential oil of peppermint reduces aggressive driving behaviour in healthy adults. Human Psychopharmacol-Clini Experim. (2023) 38:e2865. doi: 10.1002/hup.2865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Ji DH, Jang M, Min CK, Chung SC, Min BC. Masking effect of olfactory stimulus on beep stimulus while driving with graphic driving simulator. Proc Annual Meet Japan Ergonom Soc. (2011) 47:336–40. doi: 10.14874/jergo.47spl.0.336.0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Dmitrenko D, Maggioni E, Obrist M. I smell trouble: Using multiple scents to convey driving-relevant information. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. Boulder, CO: Association for Computing Machinery (2018). p. 234–238.

Google Scholar

66. Cain WS. Odor identification by males and females: predictions vs performance. Chem Senses. (1982) 7:129–42. doi: 10.1093/chemse/7.2.129

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Evans WJ, Cui L, Starr A. Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: Effects of age and gender. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1995) 95:293–301. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00055-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Diamond J, Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PAS. Gender-specific olfactory sensitization: Hormonal and cognitive influences. Chem Senses. (2005) 30:i224–5. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh195

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PAS. Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci. (2002) 5:199–200. doi: 10.1038/nn803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Oliveira-Pinto AV, Santos RM, Coutinho RA, Oliveira LM, Santos GB, Alho ATL, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the human olfactory bulb: Females have more neurons and glial cells than males. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e111733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111733

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M, et al. The effect of english-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2012) 28:138–44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000086

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar