Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 30 July 2024
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Measles second dose vaccine uptake and associated factors among under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study

Hafso Abdirahman IbrahimHafso Abdirahman Ibrahim1Abdi WariyoAbdi Wariyo2Elsai Mati AsefaElsai Mati Asefa3Abera Cheru
Abera Cheru3*Arega Abebe LonsakoArega Abebe Lonsako4Gebisa DirirsaGebisa Dirirsa3
  • 1School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
  • 2Department of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
  • 3School of Environmental Health Science, College of Health and Medical Science, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
  • 4School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

Background: Measles is one of the leading causes of under-five mortality and morbidity worldwide. Although the routine service for the second dose of the measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) was introduced in Ethiopia recently, there is a paucity of evidence regarding its coverage and the factors that hinder its uptake at both the local and national levels. Thus, this study aimed to assess the uptake of MCV2 and its associated factors among children aged between 15 and 36 months old in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 429 children aged between 15 and 36 months old with their mothers/caregivers in Jigjiga City from April 1 to May 1, 2023. A multistage sampling technique was used and data were collected by using structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. The collected data were entered into Epi-data version 3.2 and analyzed in a statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 26. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the uptake of the measles second dose vaccine. An adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI were reported and statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.

Results: The coverage of MCV2 among children aged between 15 and 36 months was 21.4% (95% CI: 17.7, 25.2). The educational status of the mother (AOR = 3.154; 95% CI: 1.68, 5.93), place of delivery (AOR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.08, 3.25), postnatal care visits of the mother (AOR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.37, 4.22), time taken to reach a health facility (AOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.28, 5.57), and knowledge about child vaccination (AOR = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.45, 4.08) were factors significantly associated with the uptake of the measles second dose vaccine.

Conclusion: The coverage of MCV2 in the study area was low compared to the national immunization targets. Educational status of the mother/caregivers, place of delivery, postnatal care visits of the mother, time to reach a health facility, and knowledge about vaccination of children were significantly associated with measles second dose vaccination. The focus should be given to improving the awareness of mothers on the importance of child vaccination to improve the uptake of measles second dose vaccine and reduce the burden of measles in the region.

Introduction

Measles is an acute respiratory illness caused by the highly contagious Morbillivirus. It primarily spreads through coughing, sneezing, and runny nose (1). Although measles can affect individuals of all ages, particularly under-five children are more susceptible to developing complications from it (2). Despite the availability of a highly effective measles vaccine since the 1960s, measles remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among young children worldwide (3). In 2020, there were 149,796 reported cases of measles, resulting in 60,700 deaths globally, with 77% of cases occurring in the African region, predominantly among children (4). Ethiopia reported 3,998 cases of measles in 2019 (5).

In 2011, African countries set a goal to eradicate measles by 2020 using any feasible mechanism available (6). In line with this goal, the Measles and Rubella Initiative (MRI) has developed a strategic plan to achieve high vaccine coverage and eliminate measles through routine immunization, aiming for over 80% coverage (7). The plan includes a target of 95% immunization coverage for both the first dose (MCV1) and second doses of the measles vaccine (MCV2) in each country. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children’s Fund (UNICEF) recommend administering MCV1 at 9 months and MCV2 at 15–18 months as part of routine immunization (8). In Ethiopia, the second dose of measles vaccination was introduced into the routine immunization program on 11 February 2019 at 15 months of age to enhance immunity and prevent measles outbreaks (9).

Nevertheless, studies have shown that the introduction and coverage of the measles second dose vaccine vary across countries, with different combinations and forms of administration (10). According to the WHO, global MCV2 coverage increased from 15% in 2000 to 73% in 2019, but significant regional disparities remain (11). The lowest coverage was observed in the African region (36%), while the Western Pacific region had the highest coverage (94%) (12). Within the same region, countries report varying coverage rates, such as less than 50% in Kenya (13) and 62% in Burkina Faso (14). In Ethiopia, a 2019 survey conducted by the Federal Ministry of Health reported national MCV2 coverage was 47%, with significant variation between regions, including the lowest coverage in Afar and Somali (14%) and the highest coverage in Southern Nation and Nationality Peoples (65%) (15). Later, in the year 2021, the joint report by WHO and UNICEF stated that MCV2 coverage in Ethiopia reached 70.6% (16).

In this regard, given a significant disparity in MVC2 coverage, factors influencing its uptake, and challenges in eradicating measles in developing countries including Ethiopia, there remains a gap in addressing these issues. Moreover, a variety of factors have been identified to influence the uptake of the second dose of the measles vaccine and its coverage. For instance, a study in China found that higher maternal education, higher number of births, and higher socioeconomic development were associated with increased coverage of the second dose (17). Another study in Ethiopia revealed that the child’s age, Penta3 vaccination, educational level of the head of the household, and region of residence were important factors affecting the second-dose vaccination rate (18).

Accordingly, improving measles control, raising immunization awareness, and conducting research on measles elimination strategies remain the global priorities (4). Importantly, routine coverage of MCV2 plays a crucial role in achieving measles elimination in Ethiopia, as emphasized by the WHO (19). To enhance and maintain MCV2 coverage, it is essential to identify factors associated with its uptake. As a newly implemented immunization program, currently little is known about MCV2 coverage and its associated factors in Ethiopia, particularly in the Somali Region. Therefore, this study aims to assess the coverage of the measles second dose vaccine and its associated factors among children aged between 15 and 36 months old in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged between 15 and 36 months old in Jigjiga City, the administrative capital of the Somali Region, located 628 km to the east of Addis Ababa the capital city of Ethiopia. Jigjiga City is composed of four districts. From four districts, the study was conducted in two districts (Qordher and Dudahidi districts). Two selected districts in Jigjiga City are composed of 15 kebeles (six urban and nine rural kebeles). The total population of the study area is 486,822, of whom 259,918 and 62,832 are women and under-five children, respectively, in 2022. There is one referral hospital, one general hospital, one primary hospital, and three health centers in the city (20). The study was conducted from April 1 to May 1, 2023.

Populations and eligibility

All children aged between 15 and 36 months old with their mothers/caregivers in Jigjiga City were the source population, whereas all children aged between 15 and 36 months old with their mothers/caregivers residing in randomly selected kebeles of Jigjiga City during the time of data collection were our study population. Accordingly, children aged between 15 and 36 months old with their mothers/caregivers were included in this study after the mothers/caregivers provided verbal informed consent. Children whose mothers or caretakers had mental impairments were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling techniques

The final required sample size for this study (429) was calculated using a single population proportion formula considering 12.36% percentage of MCV2 coverage (p) from Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey (EMDHS) 2019 data (21), under the assumptions of 4% margin of error, 10% non-response rate, 95% level of confidence, and 1.5 design effect. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 429 samples. First, two districts (Qordher and Dudahidi districts) were selected by a simple random sampling method out of four districts in Jigjiga City, then six kebeles (two urban and four rural) were selected by simple random sampling out of 15 kebeles (six urban and nine rural kebeles) which are found in two selected districts. After identifying the number of eligible under-five children residing in the selected kebeles, the final sample size was proportionally allocated and followed by systematic random sampling to obtain the desired sample size. To determine the sampling interval (K), the total number of households with eligible under-five children in the selected kebeles, which is equal to 5,731, was divided by the sample size (429) to give K = 13. To select the first household with eligible under five children, simple random sampling was used. Then every 13 households with eligible under-five children were selected to form the sample. In households with more than one eligible under-five child, a simple random sampling method was used to choose one.

Data collection and quality control procedure

Data were collected by interviewer-based structured questionnaires and checklists. The questionnaire was initially prepared in English and translated into Af-Somali and re-translated into English to ensure consistency. The questionnaire contains the socio-demographic characteristics of the mother/caregiver and child, access to healthcare facilities and questions about the child’s immunization coverage (22). Immunization coverage was measured through a checklist, both by recording immunization uptake from the mothers/caregivers-child booklet and the mothers/caregivers history (22). Proxy (caregivers) was used to obtain information on maternal characteristics relevant to the study during the data collection in the absence of mothers. Data were collected by five BSc-degree nurses and supervised by two MSc-degree nurses.

To maintain the quality of data, 2 days of training which focused on the relevance of the study, the objective of the study, ethical issues, informed consent before the interview, and interviewing techniques were given to data collectors and supervisors. The questionnaire was translated into the local language (Af-Somali) and a pre-test was conducted on 5% of the participants 2 weeks before the actual data collection on one of the kebele (kebele 20), which was not selected for the main study to modify any ambiguity on the questionnaire. The completeness of the data was checked by supervisors on each day of activity and the necessary feedback was given to data collectors on the next morning.

Study variables

Uptake of MCV2 was the outcome variable, it was measured through a checklist, both by recording immunization uptake from the mothers/caregivers-child booklet and the mothers/caregivers history, and coded as “1” if the children received MCV2 and “0” if the children did not receive MCV2 (22). Whereas characteristics of mothers/caregivers (residence, age of mothers, educational status, occupation, family size, and religion), characteristics of child (age of child, sex of child, and birth order of child), maternal healthcare service availability and accessibility-related factors [antenatal care service visits, number of antenatal care service visits, Tetanus Toxoid (TT) vaccine received, Place of delivery, postnatal care visits, time to reach health facility, waiting time to get service, and health extension worker (HEW) advised at home], mothers/caregivers knowledge about vaccination of children (knowledge about vaccination, knowledge about the schedule of measles vaccination, and knowledge about benefit of measles vaccination) and immunization coverage related characteristics [MCV1, Bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG), Third Dose of Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV3), Pentavalent 3, and Pneumococcal vaccine 3] were independent variables. The mother/caregivers were categorized as having good knowledge if she or he could mention at least three vaccines either by their name, by their route (site) of administration, or by which diseases they were meant for (23) The mothers/caregivers were categorized as having good knowledge about schedules of measles vaccination if she or he answered greater than the mean score of questions assessing knowledge about schedules of measles vaccination and having poor knowledge about schedules if she or he answered less than the mean score of questions assessing knowledge about schedules of measles vaccination (23) If mothers or caregivers knew and could mention at least one type of benefit of measles vaccination, they were categorized as having good knowledge about the benefits of vaccination (23).

Data analysis

The data were entered into Epi-data version 3.2 and exported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 for analysis. Descriptive analysis like frequency and percentage for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables were used to describe the characteristics of participants and the uptake of measles second dose vaccine. By using the binary logistic regression model, bivariable analysis was done to identify the relationship between each independent variable and the outcome variable. Independent variables with p < 0.25 were included in the multivariable analysis. Multi-collinearity was checked by using the variance inflation factor. The model fitness was checked by the Hosmer Lemeshow goodness of fit test, then, in the multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported, and variables with p < 0.05 were declared to be significantly associated with the uptake of measles second dose vaccine.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

A total of 429 mothers/caregiver pairs participated in this study, with a response rate of 100%. The mean age of the mothers/caregivers was 29.5 ± 5.48 years. More than half (54.3%) of the mothers/caregivers were rural dwellers, and the majority (85.1%) were Muslim. Regarding the educational status of the mothers/caregivers, the majority (65.0%) had no formal education and were housewives. More than two-thirds (69.7%) of the under-five children’s families had more than five members. Among the participating under-five children, nearly half (46.9%) were aged between 15 and 23 months, and half of them (50.1%) were male. Approximately one-third (34.3%) of the children were fourth in birth order (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers/caregivers and child of under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 429).

Maternal healthcare service availability, mother/caregiver accessibility, and knowledge of child vaccination

More than two-thirds (68.3%) of the mothers had antenatal care (ANC) visits, with nearly half of them (46.9%) having visited three or more times. Two-thirds (60.1%) of the mothers had not visited postnatal care (PNC). The majority (78.1%) of the mothers received tetanus vaccinations during their last pregnancy, and two-thirds (60.4%) of them gave birth in health institutions. The average time to reach a health facility was 15 min for more than half (50.1%) of the mothers/caregivers, and the average waiting time was 30 min. More than two-thirds (61.8%) of the mothers/caregivers were not advised by health extension workers (HEW) at home. Regarding mothers/caregivers’ knowledge about child vaccination, more than half (53.1%) had poor knowledge about vaccination, and approximately half (51.5%) had poor knowledge about the schedules of measles vaccination. However, three-fourths (77.9%) of the mothers/caregivers had good knowledge about the benefits of measles vaccination (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Healthcare service availability and accessibility, and knowledge about vaccination of under-five children related factors of mother/caregivers in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 429).

Coverage of MCV2 among under-five children

Among the 429 aged between 15 and 36 months old in this study, 92 (21.4%) (95% CI: 17.7, 25.2) received the measles second dose vaccine (MCV2). More than half (59.0%) of the children received the measles first dose vaccine. The majority (80.2%) of the children received the BCG vaccine, and high coverage rates were observed for oral polio vaccine 3 (OPV3) (85.5%), Pentavalent 3 (82.5%), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 3 (PCV3) (76.7%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Immunization coverage among under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia, 2023.

The majority of rural resident mothers/caregivers which accounts for 189(81.1%) did not receive MCV2. More than 85% of mothers or caregivers who were ≥ 35 years did not receive MCV2 whereas only 11(13.1%) received MCV2. Among children found between 24 and 34 months 39(27.7%) received MCV2 and out of children greater or equal to 35 months 19 (21.8%) received MCV2. Among total mothers delivered in health institutions about 68(26.3%) were received MCV2 were as out of mothers who visits PNC, 70(27.1%) received MCV2 (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Bivariable logistic regression of factors associated with uptake of MCV2 among under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia, 2023.

Factors associated with MCV2 uptake

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the educational status of the mother/caregivers, place of delivery, postnatal care visits of the mother, time to reach a health facility, and knowledge about child vaccination were significantly associated with MCV2 uptake at a p value <0.05.

Children whose mothers/caregivers had secondary and above education levels had 3.15 times higher odds of receiving MCV2 compared to children whose mothers/caregivers had no formal education (AOR = 3.15; 95% CI: 1.68, 5.93). The odds of MCV2 utilization were increased by 88% among children whose mothers delivered in healthcare facilities compared to those born at home [AOR = 1.88; 95% CI: (1.08, 3.25)]. The odds of receiving the MCV2 vaccine were 2.4 times higher among children whose mothers attended postnatal care as compared to those whose mothers did not attend postnatal care (AOR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.37, 4.22). The odds of receiving the MCV2 vaccine were 2.67 higher among children at a distance of less than or equal to 30 min from health facilities as compared to children at a distance of greater than 30 min from health facilities (AOR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.28, 5.57). Moreover, the odds of receiving the MCV2 vaccine were 2.43 times higher among children whose mothers/caregivers had awareness of vaccination as compared to children whose mother/caregivers had no awareness of vaccination [AOR = 2.43; 95% CI: (1.45, 4.08)] (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with uptake of MCV2 among under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 429).

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the coverage of MCV2 and associated factors among children aged between 15 and 36 months old in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia. It was found that the coverage of MCV2 among under-five children in Jigjiga City was 21.4% (95% CI, 17.7, 25.2). This indicates the coverage of MCV2 in this study is too low when compared with the national immunization targets (95%) (24). This result is consistent with the study conducted in Kenya, which found a coverage of 17.9% (22). However, this finding is higher than the studies conducted in Malawi (<10%) (25) and different areas of Ethiopia such as the Mini-EDHS of 2019 (12.4%) (18), and a survey at the national level of Ethiopia on MCV2 coverage in the Somali region (14%) (15). The timing differences in vaccine rollout, as Ethiopia introduced the MCV2 vaccine in 2019, could account for these disparities, presenting challenges in terms of perception, women’s knowledge, and their willingness to be vaccinated.

On the other hand, the coverage found in Jigjiga City is lower than the national level coverage of 47% (15) and studies conducted in Switzerland (88%) (26), China (68.2%) (17), Indonesia (54%) (27), Algeria, and Cape Verde (≥95%) (25), Kenya such as Trans Nzoia County (56.2%) (28), eight Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (44.77%) (29), and Ethiopia such as North Shoa Zone (42.5%) (30). This discrepancy may be attributed to the unequal distribution of health facilities, differences in access to immunization programs, and population attitudes toward the value of measles vaccination.

In this study, the odds of MCV2 coverage were three times higher among children whose mother/caregiver givers had secondary education or above compared to children whose mother/caregiver had no formal education. This finding is consistent with research from China (17), eight Sub-Saharan African countries (29), Ethiopia (18), North Mecha District, West Gojjam Zone, North West Ethiopia (31) and Jabitehnan District, Northwest Ethiopia (32). Educated mothers/caregivers are more likely to possess better knowledge and understanding of the benefits of vaccination, leading to higher rates of vaccination for their children. Maternal education positively influences the practice of MCV2 utilization, recognizing its role in preventing the disease.

The odds of MCV2 utilization were increased by 88% among children whose mothers delivered in healthcare facilities compared to those born at home. This finding is supported by studies conducted in China (17), Senegal Demographic and Health Survey (33) and eight Sub-Saharan African countries (29). Mothers who give birth in healthcare facilities receive education on the importance of measles vaccination from healthcare professionals, thereby increasing compliance with recommended vaccination schedules for their children. Furthermore, the odds of MCV2 utilization were two times higher among children born to mothers who attended postnatal care compared to those whose mothers did not attend postnatal care. This finding was similar with the study conducted in Southeast Bale Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia (34), Gambela Region, Southwest Ethiopia (23), at Mizan Aman town, Bench Maji zone, Southwest Ethiopia (35) and research from eight Sub-Saharan African countries (29). Women who access postnatal care receive counseling and health education regarding the need for MCV2 for their children. Additionally, postnatal care visits often involve scheduling future appointments for both the mother and the child. These scheduled visits serve as reminders for mothers to bring their children for vaccinations, including MCV2.

Moreover, the odds of MCV2 utilization were almost three times higher among mothers/caregivers who reported that distance to healthcare facilities ≤30 min compared to those who reported distances take more than 30 min. This finding is in line with research from Northwest Ethiopia (36), Hard-to-Reach Areas of Ethiopia (37), Kakamega County in Kenya (22), and eight Sub-Saharan African countries (29). Challenges related to travel costs, suitable roads, and travel phobia could contribute to missed MCV2 vaccinations among mothers living far from healthcare facilities.

Lastly, the odds of MCV2 utilization were two times higher among children whose mothers/caregivers had good knowledge of vaccination compared to those whose mothers/caregivers had poor knowledge. This finding is in agreement with previous studies conducted in Jabitehnan District, Northwest Ethiopia (32), Kakamega County in Kenya (22), and North Shoa Zone in Ethiopia (30). This might be due to knowledgeable mothers or caregivers being more likely to be aware of the recommended vaccination schedule, including the timing of MCV2 administration. They understand the significance of timely vaccination and the potential consequences of delayed or missed doses. On the other hand, knowledgeable mothers or caregivers are better equipped to make informed decisions about their children’s health, including immunizations. They may actively seek information, ask questions, and engage in discussions with healthcare providers. This empowerment enables them to advocate for their children’s vaccination needs and overcome barriers that may hinder vaccine uptake.

However, this study has certain limitations, the cross-sectional design of the study does not allow for establishing a temporal relationship between cause and effect. There might be social desirability bias related to self-reported data and some of the children had no vaccination cards, and information about vaccination status had to be limited to the mother’s verbal responses which might be liable to recall bias. Additionally, in this study, since the outcome is frequent (higher than 10%), the odds ratio estimated with logistic regression may tend to overestimate the strength of association (showing a stronger effect than in reality). Moreover, in this study service delivery factors on the supplier side like the availability of vaccines were not assessed. Therefore, further studies are needed in the future to address these limitations and obtain a more comprehensive understanding of MCV2 coverage and associated factors with a robust model which reports the prevalence ratio. Despite these limitations, the study findings add to the body of knowledge on MCV2 coverage and possible associated factors which were previously not addressed by the majority of the study especially among children between 15 to 36 months of age.

This study has also significant implications for public health in numerous ways. The finding of this study highlights the need for targeted interventions and strategies to improve vaccine coverage rates. Public health authorities can use this information to design and implement programs aimed at increasing awareness about the importance of the measles vaccine and addressing barriers to its uptake. This study also provides valuable insights into the factors associated with low vaccine uptake and public health officials can develop tailored interventions to address each specific factor. The findings of this study also underscore the need to strengthen healthcare systems to ensure effective vaccine delivery and monitoring. This can involve training healthcare providers to effectively communicate the benefits of vaccines, improving the availability and accessibility of vaccines and immunization services, and implementing robust surveillance systems to track vaccine coverage and identify areas of improvement.

Conclusion and recommendations

The coverage of MCV2 uptake among children aged between 15 and 36 months old in this study area was too low compared to the national immunization targets (95%). Mothers/caregivers’ education level of secondary and above, delivery in healthcare facilities, attendance of postnatal care, proximity to healthcare facilities, and mother/caregivers’ good knowledge of vaccination were factors significantly associated with MCV2 uptake.

The focus should be given to improving mother/caregiver education, promoting facility-based deliveries, enhancing postnatal care services, addressing transportation challenges, and implementing educational campaigns to increase vaccination awareness.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Research and Ethical Review Committee of Jigjiga University and the College of Medicine and Health Science (JJU/CMHS-RHERC/046/2015). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

HI: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. EA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. AC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. GD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Financial support was provided by Jigjiga University.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jigjiga University College of Medicine and Health Science for providing the budget to conduct this study. We would also like to thank the Jigjiga city administration for their valuable cooperation during data collection. Finally, we would also like to acknowledge data collectors and supervisors for their commitment during data collection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

AOR, Adjusted odd ratio; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; CSA, Central Statistical Agency; COR, Crude odds ratio; EDHS, Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey; FMOH, Federal Ministry of Health; IHREC, Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee; MCV1, First dose of measles containing vaccine; MCV2, Second dose of measles containing vaccine; OPV, Oral polio vaccine; OPV3, Third dose of oral polio vaccine; PCV: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PNC, Post natal care; SPSS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; UNICEF, United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund; WHO, World Health Organization

References

1. Estofolete, CF, Milhim, BHGDA, França, CCGD, Silva, GCDD, Augusto, MT, Terzian, ACB, et al. Prevalence of measles antibodies in São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil: a serological survey model. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62151-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mina, MJ, Kula, T, Leng, Y, Li, M, De Vries, RD, Knip, M, et al. Measles virus infection diminishes preexisting antibodies that offer protection from other pathogens. Science. (2019) 366:599–606. doi: 10.1126/science.aay6485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kanyiru, RW. Factors associated with uptake of measles-rubella vaccine among children age 9–18 months in Eastleigh north Ward Nairobi county, Kenya. Int J Sci Res Publ. (2020) 9:p8905. doi: 10.29322/IJSRP.9.05.2019.p8905

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dixon, MG, Ferrari, M, Antoni, S, Li, X, Portnoy, A, Lambert, B, et al. Progress toward regional measles elimination—worldwide, 2000–2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2021) 70:1563–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7045a1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. WHO (2016). “WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system,” Global summary. Available at: http://who.int/ (Accessed November 23, 2022).

Google Scholar

6. Orenstein, WA, Cairns, L, Hinman, A, Nkowane, B, Olivé, J-M, and Reingold, AL. Measles and rubella global strategic plan 2012–2020 midterm review report: background and summary. Vaccine. (2018) 36:A35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.065

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Biellik, RJ, and Orenstein, WA. Strengthening routine immunization through measles-rubella 345 elimination. Vaccine. (2018) 36:5645–50.

Google Scholar

8. WHO. Progress towards regional measles elimination–worldwide, 2000–2015. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. (2016) 91:525–35.

Google Scholar

9. FMOH (2021). Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia. Expanded program on immunization (EPI) case team Ethiopia. Available at: https://www.moh.gov.et/ejcc/am/EPI

Google Scholar

10. Chirwa, G, Wilkins, KA, and Mercer, DJ. Descriptive study of measles vaccination second dose reporting and barriers to improving coverage in six districts in Malawi. Pan Afr Med J. (2020) 35:5. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.1.19096

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. WHO (2021). Measles-containing vaccine second dose (MCV2) immunization coverage by the nationally recommended age (%).

Google Scholar

12. WHO (2020). Measles and rubella strategic framework: 2021–2030. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/measles-and-rubella-strategic-framework-2021-2030

Google Scholar

13. Kisangau, N, Sergon, K, Ibrahim, Y, Yonga, FLD, Langat, D, Nzunza, R, et al. R. N. Progress towards the elimination of measles in Kenya, 2003–2016. Pan Afr Med J. (2018) 31:65. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.65.16309

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zoma, RL, Walldorf, JA, Tarbangdo, F, Patel, JC, Diallo, AO, and Nkwenkeu, SF. Evaluation of the impact of meningococcal serogroup a conjugate vaccine introduction on second-year-of-life vaccination coverage in Burkina Faso. J Infect Dis. (2019) 220:S233–43. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz304

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. FMOH (2019). Measles elimination in Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

17. Hu, Y, Chen, Y, Wang, Y, and Liang, H. Measles containing vaccine with simultaneous administration and risk factors for missed opportunities among children in Zhejiang province, East China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2018) 14:875–80. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1419111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Muluneh, AG, Merid, MW, Tigabu, B, Ferede, MG, Kassa, GM, and Animut, Y. Less than one-fifth of Ethiopian children were vaccinated for measles second dose; evidence from the Ethiopian mini demographic and health survey 2019. Vaccine X. (2022) 12:100217.

Google Scholar

19. WHO. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper, April 2017– recommendations. Vaccine. (2019) 37:219–22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.066

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. JCF (2022). Jggjiga City Facts.

Google Scholar

21. Muluneh, AG, Merid, MW, Tigabu, B, Ferede, MG, Kassa, GM, and Animut, YJVX. Less than one-fifth of Ethiopian children were vaccinated for measles second dose; as evidenced by the. Ethiop Mini Demograph Health Surv. (2019) 12:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100217

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Makokha, FM (2017). Uptake of second dose of measles vaccine among children in Kakamega County, Kenya. COHES, JKUAT.

Google Scholar

23. Mebrat, A, Dube, L, Kebede, A, and Aweke, Z. Determinants of incomplete childhood vaccination among children aged 12-23 months in Gambela region, Southwest Ethiopia: a case-control study. Ethiop J Health Sci. (2021) 31:3–4. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i1.8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. WHO (2020). The immunological basis for immunization series: Module 7: Measles: Update. Available at: https://iriswhoint/handle/10665/331533 (Accessed June 24, 2024).

Google Scholar

25. Masresha, BG, Luce, R, Okeibunor, J, Shibeshi, ME, Kamadjeu, R, and Fall, A. Introduction of the second dose of measles containing vaccine in the childhood vaccination programs within the WHO Africa region – lessons learnt. J Immunol Sci. (2018) 2:113–21. doi: 10.29245/2578-3009/2018/si.1117

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Altpeter, E, Wymann, MN, Richard, JL, and Mäusezahl-Feuz, M. A marked increase in measles vaccination coverage among young adults in Switzerland: a campaign or cohort effect? Int J Public Health. (2018) 63:589–99. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1102-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Maulida, R, Rahmartani, LD, Hairani, LK, and Wahyono, TYM. Coverage and determinants of second-dose measles vaccination among under-five children in Aceh Jaya District, Aceh Province, Indonesia. J Epidemiol Kesehatan Indon. (2018) 2:29. doi: 10.7454/epidkes.v2i1.3049

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mamuti, S, Tabu, C, Marete, I, Opili, D, Jalang’o, R, and Abade, A. Measles containing vaccine coverage and factors associated with its uptake among children aged 24–59 months in Cherangany Sub County, trans Nzoia County, Kenya. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0263780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263780

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chilot, D, Belay, DG, Shitu, K, Gela, YY, Getnet, M, Mulat, B, et al. Measles second dose vaccine utilization and associated factors among children aged 24–35 months in sub-Saharan Africa, a multi-level analysis from recent DHS surveys. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14478-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Tadesse, AW, Sahlu, D, and Benayew, M. Second-dose measles vaccination and associated factors among under-five children in urban areas of north Shoa zone, Central Ethiopia, 2022. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:1029740. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Asichalew, A. (2021). Utilization of measles conjugated vaccine 2 and associated factors among children aged 24–35 months in north Mecha District, West Gojjam Zone, North West Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

32. Demewoz, A, Wubie, M, Mengie, MG, Kassegn, EM, Jara, D, Aschale, A, et al. Second dose measles vaccination utilization and associated factors in Jabitehnan District, Northwest Ethiopia. Dose-Response. (2023) 21:15593258231164042. doi: 10.1177/15593258231164042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sarker, AR, Akram, R, Ali, N, Chowdhury, ZI, and Sultana, M. Coverage and determinants of full immunization: vaccination coverage among Senegalese children. Medicina. (2019) 55:480. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080480

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Adugna, B, Tola, A, Fite, MB, and Motuma, A. Determinants of second-dose measles vaccination dropout in Ethiopia: a community-based matched case-control study. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e30764. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Meleko, A, Geremew, M, and Birhanu, F. Assessment of child immunization coverage and associated factors with full vaccination among children aged 12–23 months at Mizan Aman town, bench Maji zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Paediatr. (2017) 2017:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2017/7976587

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Taffie, W, Temesgen, H, Ashebir, W, and Mekonen, H. Measles second dose vaccine uptake and its associated factors among children aged 24–35 months in Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:11059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61048-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Girmay, A, and Dadi, AF. Full immunization coverage and associated factors among children aged 12-23 months in hard-to-reach areas of Ethiopia. Int J Paediatr. (2019) 2019:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2019/1924941

Google Scholar

Keywords: measles, MCV2, children, Somalia, Ethiopia

Citation: Ibrahim HA, Wariyo A, Asefa EM, Cheru A, Abebe Lonsako A and Dirirsa G (2024) Measles second dose vaccine uptake and associated factors among under-five children in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health. 12:1395802. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395802

Received: 04 March 2024; Accepted: 22 July 2024;
Published: 30 July 2024.

Edited by:

Maarten Jacobus Postma, University of Groningen, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Raymond Salanga Dankoli, World Health Organization, Ukraine
Irina Kislaya, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (BNITM), Germany
Samuel Bawa, World Health Organization—Regional Office for Nigeria, Nigeria

Copyright © 2024 Ibrahim, Wariyo, Asefa, Cheru, Abebe Lonsako and Dirirsa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Abera Cheru, Cheruabex@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.