Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health, 15 November 2024
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic Maternal Health Services Utilization in Sub-Saharan Africa View all 10 articles

Adequate antenatal care service utilizations after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

\r\nTemesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh
Temesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh1*Zelalem Solomon TadesseZelalem Solomon Tadesse2
  • 1Department of Public Health, College of Medical and Health Science, Samara University, Semera, Ethiopia
  • 2Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Samara University, Semera, Ethiopia

Background: The world faces great difficulty in continuing to provide essential maternity health care after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic Many women have trouble accessing maternity healthcare due to fear of infection. A decline in the utilization of maternity health services is suggested to worsen adequate antenatal care service utilization. Thus, this study aimed to determine the pooled estimate of adequate antenatal care service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 in Ethiopia.

Methods: The searching of articles was carried out on Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, CINHAL, Google Scholar, African journals online, and the institutional repository of Ethiopian universities. Using a Microsoft Excel standardized spreadsheet, the data were extracted. A random effect model was used to determine a pooled estimate of adequate antenatal care utilization. I2 statistics were used to quantify the amount of heterogeneity. The evidence of publication bias was examined using Egger's regression test and a visual inspection of the funnel plot. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

Results: Finally, this systematic review and meta-analysis included 11 eligible articles. The overall pooled estimate of adequate antenatal care service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was 46.28% (95% CI: 35.32%−57.26%). There is a substantial amount of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 99.07%, p < 0.001). Pregnant women who visited antenatal care early were 10.9 times more likely to have adequate antenatal care utilization than those without early visits (AOR = 10.93, 95% CI: 7.2–14.66).

Conclusion: In this review, the percentage of women who utilized adequate antenatal care after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was less than half. Early antenatal care visit is an important factor to achieve adequate antenatal care service utilizations.

Systematic review registration: : CRD42023495279.

Introduction

Antenatal care (ANC) is an essential component of improving maternal and newborn health (1). For all pregnant women, WHO recommends at least four ANC visits (2). In Ethiopia, primary healthcare centers provided health services such as maternal and child healthcare, education on health problems, the development of effective food supply and proper nutrition, safe water supply and basic sanitation, endemic disease control, treatment of common diseases and injuries, and provision of essential medications. Community health extension workers have significantly contributed to the increase in women's utilization of ANC, family planning, and HIV testing (3, 4). Globally, COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantial disruptions to issues related to politics, health, economy, and society (5). The COVID-19 pandemic affected the provision of all health care services globally (6). Health care systems have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in many ways, such as the temporary closure of services (7) and the utilization of non-COVID services (8). The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major issues for pregnant women, as hospitals and healthcare providers have found it difficult to address the demands of infection prevention, pandemic preparedness, treating a high number of critically ill patients, and attending to the needs of non-urgent pregnant patients (9). Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions, there may be decreased perceived social support and limited access to prenatal services, which could exacerbate pregnancy-specific stress (10). The findings of the literature review showed that health systems, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, have concerns about the necessity of giving women's ANC priority during COVID-19 pandemic in order to ensure the safety of the newborn baby (11).

A systematic review and meta-analysis study done globally revealed that ANC appointments decreased by 38.6% throughout the pandemic period (12). During COVID-19's second wave, about 39.5% of pregnant women in Indonesia did not receive ANC services (13). In Brazil, ANC was considered adequate for 35.8% of postpartum women (14). During COVID-19 pandemic, 46.4% of Filipino women received adequate ANC (15). Adequate ANC service utilization was 12.7% during COVID-19 pandemic in Chiapas (16). In a study of sub-Saharan Africa, the country's median reduction in utilization of health services in 2020 was 3.9%. The highest reductions were observed for inpatient and outpatient admissions, while ANC, delivery care, and immunization services had smaller reductions. Eastern African countries had the highest reductions (17). In a hospital-based study in Georgia, there were 965 women who accessed prenatal care prior to COVID-19 pandemic and 793 women accessed during the pandemic. The mean number of prenatal care visits was almost comparable prior to COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic (mean = 6.9 prior to the pandemic vs. 7.1 after the pandemic) (18). In a study of four Sub-Saharan countries (Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda), the number of ANC visits during the pandemic (2020) and before the pandemic (2019) was comparable; however, decreases in the number of consultations were noted in Tanzania, Malawi, and Uganda in 2020 compared to 2019 (19). Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 2010 to 2018 showed that the optimal ANC utilization rate in East African nations was 56.37%, with Rwanda having the lowest optimal ANC utilization (44.3%) and Zimbabwe having the highest optimal ANC utilization (81%) (20). The pandemic caused the ANC's level of adequacy to drop by 75.8% compared with the pre-pandemic rate (16). During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Uganda had ANC service attendance rate of 48.2%. There was a 7.1% reduction in the number of ANC visits during the COVID-19 lockdown period, compared to prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 (21). In Kenya, about 20% of women before the pandemic achieved adequate ANC utilization, whereas 14% of women achieved adequate ANC utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic (22).

A systematic review conducted in Ethiopia showed that the pooled reduction of ANC was 19.3%, family planning was 26.6%, institutional delivery was 12.8%, postnatal care was 17.8%, and abortion care was 19.4% (23). Using mini-EDHS 2019, 43% of women had optimal ANC visits during their last pregnancy (24). A study at the district level in Ethiopia conducted between 2019 and 2020 indicated that 43.7% of women in their last birth received four or more ANC (25). In Ethiopia, studies reporting the proportion of ANC utilization before the COVID-10 pandemic (2018–2019) and after the COVID pandemic (2020–2021) are provided in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The proportion of ANC service utilization before the COVID-19 pandemic and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The fear of contracting COVID-19, anxiety, feeling vulnerable, the desire to protect oneself and loved ones, the stay-at-home policy, transportation issues, limited social interaction, high-risk pregnancies, a lack of knowledge, and adherence to COVID-19 preventive behaviors were obstacles to accessing ANC during COVID-19 pandemic (28). The COVID-19 pandemic had significant morbidity and socioeconomic impacts associated with receiving low-quality and accessing maternity healthcare as a result of fear of infection and the use of containment strategies such as social distance and community restriction (29). Government COVID-19 movement restrictions and the subsequent limited transport access resulted in a high cost of transport, which played a role in reducing mothers' access to ANC services (30). A facility-based study conducted in Ethiopia found a reduction in receiving recommended prenatal care services due to fear of COVID-19 and service interruptions caused by the pandemic (31). A community-based cross-sectional study in Ethiopia revealed that distance to health facilities was a challenge to accessing maternal health care service utilization amid the COVID-19 pandemic (32). In Ethiopia, community-based health insurance improves health service utilization (33, 34). Recommended ANC utilization was higher among mothers with health insurance than those with no health insurance (35, 36).

Improving health system resilience through integrated health service delivery is a potential strategy during the outbreak of the disease (37). There is no reason to worry about maternal and child health services being overshadowed by COVID-19 (38). Proper prenatal care is essential for the health of the pregnant mother and the developing baby. Inadequate prenatal care causes low birth weight, preterm birth, and miscarriage (39). Adequate antenatal care service utilization is essential to both mother and child health; however, many studies have reported that COVID-19 pandemics affect many provisions of health service delivery, including ANC service, especially in developing countries. Even though there were district-level studies about adequate ANC service utilization in Ethiopia after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, there is a lack of integrated data regarding the use of adequate ANC service utilization after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at the national level. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled magnitude of adequate ANC service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-2020) checklist (40) (Supplementary File S1) was followed in the reporting of this systematic review and meta-analysis. The systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with identification number CRD42023495279.

Search strategies

Comprehensive search strategies were conducted from February 15, 2024, to February 22, 2024, using distinct electronic databases such as PubMed, CINHAL, Google Scholar, and African journals online. To find studies that were missed by electronic database searches, further manual searches were conducted using online higher education repositories, government institutes, and reference lists. The following keywords served as the basis for the search strings or terms: adequate, antenatal care, and Ethiopia. Using the Boolean operator “AND,” the keywords “adequate,” “antenatal care,” and “Ethiopia” were combined. The “OR” Boolean operator was used to combine synonyms for each of the key search terms. The search was restricted to studies with full text, published in the English language, and a publication date between January 1, 2020, and February 22, 2024, where a database could allow this filter. Further information regarding the search strategy of the selected databases is attached (Supplementary File S2).

Study selection

Two authors (TGW and ZS) carried out the search strategies from the relevant databases. Studies identified through different database searches were exported to Endnote X8.1 software. Duplicated studies were removed by Endnote X8.1 software. TGW and ZS independently screened the selected articles for the relevance of the review objective based on the titles and abstracts. After the screening of titles and abstracts, the full texts of articles considered relevant were retrieved. The eligibility of each article was assessed independently by two authors (TGW and ZS) after reviewing their full texts. Scientific consensus settled the disagreements between the two authors.

Eligible criteria

To establish the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis, the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) framework technique was used, which mainly involves population, outcome, and context (POCo) questions for prevalence studies. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were presented in Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Operational definition

The number of ANC coverage of at least four or above during women's pregnancy reported in the primary studies was considered adequate ANC; otherwise, it is inadequate ANC (41, 42).

Data extraction process

Relevant data from the primary papers was extracted independently by two authors (TGW and ZS). A standardized data extraction format created from Microsoft Excel was used to retrieve the data. For each included study, the following information was extracted: the first author's name, publication year, the study period, the study region, the study setting, the study subjects, the sample size, the number of cases with adequate ANC, and the proportion of adequate ANC. A scientific consensus was used to resolve the disagreements between the two authors. Data for the associated factors were retrieved, and the odds ratio for each factor was extracted using two by two tables (Supplementary File S3).

Quality assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for evaluation of the quality of the cohort is adapted to assess the quality of the included studies in this systematic review and meta-analysis (43). Two authors (TGW and ZS) independently assessed the qualities of the included studies. Subjectivities between the two authors were settled by using the mean score of the reviewers' results as well as through scientific consensus. The qualities of the included studies were evaluated using ten-star ratings in three domains. The first is selection (five stars): sample representativeness (one star), sampling technique (one star), response rate (one star), and exposure ascertainment (two stars). The second is comparability (two stars): confounding controlled outcomes adjusted for pertinent risk factors (two stars). The third is outcome (three stars): assessment of outcome by independent blind assessment (two stars) and statistical tests clearly described (one star). The following scoring algorithms were used to assess the quality of each study: a study receiving 7–10, 5–6, and 0–4 points was considered to have good, fair, and poor quality, respectively. We only included articles of fair to good quality to preserve this systematic review's validity. Finally, articles with a fair to good quality rating were considered high quality and included in the meta-analysis.

Data synthesis and statistical test

The characteristics of each of the included studies and the main findings were described in a summary table. The extracted data were imported into Stata software version 15 for quantitative statistical analysis. The results of the meta-analysis were graphically displayed by using forest plots. Cochran's Q statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies, and I2 statistics were used to quantify the amount of heterogeneity (44). The presence of heterogeneity across included studies was considered when the p-value was <0.1 or I2 > 50%. As substantial heterogeneity was exhibited among studies, a random-effects model was used to determine pooled estimates. To minimize heterogeneity among the primary studies, subgroup analysis was conducted based on study region, study setting, study year, and sample size. The evidence of publication bias was examined using Egger's regression test and a visual inspection of the asymmetry in the funnel plot (45). Egger's test regression was considered to be evidence of publication if a p-value was <0.05. Nonparametric trim and fill analysis was carried out using random-effects model analysis in cases where evidence of publication bias was identified (46). A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine whether a single study affects the overall estimate (47).

Results

Search result

Using various international databases and their search algorithms, a total of 2,386 articles were found. A total of 1,331 articles retained after 1,055 duplicates were removed. After two authors (TGW and ZS) screened the remaining articles by examining their titles and abstracts, 1,108 articles with unrelated titles and 185 articles after reviewing their abstracts were excluded. Out of 38 articles that remained for full-text evaluation, 27 were excluded for a variety of reasons, including no definite information on outcome, studies conducted at the national level, studies on pregnant women receiving ANC, studies with related topics, studies that reported the magnitude of delayed ANC only, and review studies. In the end, 11 eligible articles were included in the final meta-analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart for the selection of studies for systematic review.

Study characteristics

A total of 7,387 study participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis; of these, 3,064 had adequate ANC service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic. All 11 included studies were cross-sectional. All study subjects were reproductive-age women who had already given birth. Five studies were conducted in the Amhara region (4852). Two studies were conducted in the Oromia region (53, 54). One study was carried out in each of the following regions: Sidama (55), SNNP (56), Dire Dawa (57), and Afar (58). In 2020, six studies were conducted (5153, 55, 56, 58). Two of the studies (48, 49) were conducted in 2020–2021; the other two studies (54, 57) were conducted in 2021. One study was conducted in 2022 (50). Nine studies were conducted in community-based settings, while two studies were conducted in health institutions. The smallest sample size was 230 (57), and the largest was 1,130 (55). The percentages of minimum and maximum adequate antenatal care were 20.7% (50) and 78.5% (51), respectively. Response rates of the studies ranged from 94.2% to 100% (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Characteristics of the included studies.

Quality (risk of bias) assessment

The qualities of the included studies were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa appraisal check lists. Included studies were cross-sectional. The quality of all included studies ranged from 7 (70%) to 10 (100%). Two studies were scored 7 out of 10, and three studies were scored 8 out of 10. The remaining six studies scored 10 out of 10. All included studies had good quality (Supplementary File S4).

The pooled estimate of adequate antenatal care (ANC) service utilization after COVID-19 pandemic

Using the random-effect model, the overall pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization after COVID-19 pandemic was 46.28% (95% CI: 35.32–57.26%). There was a substantial amount of heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 99.07%, p < 0.001; Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plot of the pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic.

Subgroup analysis

In the subgroup analysis by region, the highest percentages of adequate ANC service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic were 63% (95% CI: 56%−69%) and 56% (95% CI: 53%−59%) in Dire Dawa and SNNP, respectively. In the Amhara region, adequate ANC service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic was 45% (95% CI: 26%−65%) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 99.1%, p < 0.001). Adequate ANC service utilization was 67% (95% CI: 63%−70%) in studies conducted in health institutions with no heterogeneity and 42 % (95%CI: 31%−53%) in studies conducted in communities with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.1%, p < 0.001). In 2020, 2021, and 2022, the correspondent rates of adequate ANC service utilization were 45% (95% CI: 31%−60%), 67% (95% CI: 63%−70%), and 21% (95% CI: 18%−24%), respectively. The utilization of adequate ANC services during the 2020–2021 study periods was 37 % (95% CI: 35%−40%). During the 2020 study period, a significant level of heterogeneity was noted (I2 = 99.2%, p < 0.001). In the sample size of less than 422, adequate ANC service utilization was 70% (95% CI: 61%−79%) with the absence of heterogeneity. Utilization of adequate ANC service was 38% (95% CI: 29%−47%) in the sample size of ≥422 with high heterogeneity (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Subgroup analysis.

Publication bias

The result of Egger's test [bias = 12.1 (95% CI: −0.08–24.4), p = 0.051] showed the absence of publication bias, but the asymmetric distribution of studies in the funnel plot indicated the existence of publication bias (Figure 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Funnel plot to assess publication bias for adequate ANC utilization.

Sensitivity analysis

A sensitivity analysis with a random effects model was done to examine any outliers on the overall pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization during COVID-19 pandemic. It showed that there was no single study that influenced the overall pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization. The results of the sensitivity analysis were fairly stable (Figure 4).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis for a pooled estimate of adequate ANC utilization after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Associated risk factors for adequate antenatal care (ANC) service utilization

In this study, planned pregnancy, wanted pregnancy, and early ANC visits were eligible factors to conduct a meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that early ANC visits had a significant positive association with adequate ANC service utilization; however, planned and wanted pregnancy did not show a significant association with adequate ANC service utilization.

The association between early ANC visits and adequate ANC service utilization

Two studies (51, 52) were found to determine the association between early ANC visits and adequate ANC service utilization. The findings of both studies indicated a significant association with adequate ANC service utilization. The results of the current meta-analysis revealed that pregnant women who visit ANC services early were 10.9 times more likely to have adequate ANC than those without early ANC visits (AOR = 10.93, 95% CI: 7.2–14.66). There is no heterogeneity between studies (Figure 5).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The association between early ANC visits and adequate ANC utilization.

The association of planned pregnancy with adequate ANC service utilization

Three studies (49, 51, 52) were identified to investigate the relationship between planned pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization. The findings of the two primary studies (51, 52) indicated that planned pregnancy did not have a significant association with adequate ANC, while one primary study found a significant association (49). The result of the meta-analysis showed no significant association between planned pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.78–2.3), with no heterogeneity among the studies (Figure 6).

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The association of planned pregnancy with adequate ANC service utilization.

The association between wanted pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization

Two studies (49, 52) were used to determine the association between wanted pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization. One study had a significant association (49), whereas the other one did not have a significant association (52). The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant association between wanted pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: −0.05–2.98), with high significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 75.2%, p < 0.001; Figure 7).

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. The association between wanted pregnancy and adequate ANC service utilization.

Discussion

In Ethiopia, ANC service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic was reduced at the national and regional levels (23, 26). In reality, there is no reason to worry about maternal and child health services being overshadowed by the COVID-19 pandemic (38). Improving health system resilience through integrated healthcare service delivery was a potential strategy during the outbreak of the disease (37), but the health systems at the international and national levels collapsed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The delivery of health services, including ANC service, was interrupted and closed in Ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the magnitude of adequate ANC service utilization and its associated risk factors in Ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to restore primary healthcare service delivery (24) affected by COVID in Ethiopia and improve maternal and newborn health (1).

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the overall pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was 46.28%. This result is almost identical to those of studies in Philippines (15) and Uganda (21). This similarity may be due to the worldwide stay-at-home policy (28) and the government's COVID-19 travel restrictions (16) following the WHO's COVID-19 pandemic declaration. Similarly, the current study's magnitude of adequate ANC was comparable with that of Rwanda (20), the mini-EDHS 2019 study (24) and a district-level study conducted between 2019 and 2020 in Ethiopia (25). The current magnitude is also in line with the results of another study conducted in Georgia, which found that the average number of prenatal care visits was about the same before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (18). Studies conducted in Sub-Saharan countries also found similar evidence of a smaller reduction of ANC in 2020 compared to 2019 (17) and a comparable number of ANC visits before the pandemic (2019) and after the pandemic (2020) (19).

However, utilization of adequate ANC service in this meta-analysis was higher than studies conducted in Indonesia (13), Chiapas (16), and Kenya (22). This discrepancy may be due to differences in the severity of COVID-19 in different countries, particularly the occurrence of several critically ill COVID-19 patients (9) in these countries. This could make pregnant women anxious and fearful of contracting COVID-19, as well as vulnerable (28), which could limit their ability to receive adequate ANC services (10).

The pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization in this meta-analysis was lower than that in studies conducted in east Africa from 2010 to 2018 (20). This could be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic's effects, including transportation problems (24, 26, 28), fear of infection, and the implementation of containment measures like social distance and community restrictions (29, 31). Furthermore, the magnitude of adequate ANC in the present study was less than in the previous studies conducted during COVID-19 in Ethiopia (26, 27). The present study's definition of the outcome, which requires that at least four ANC visits are necessary for adequate outcomes, differs from previous studies that defined ANC service utilization broadly and did not put this restriction on at least four ANC utilizations, which could also explain the difference. In general, healthcare service delivery is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic globally (5, 6), such as temporary closure of services (7, 8), and hospitals and healthcare providers are facing challenges in handling a high number of critically ill COVID-19 patients and meeting the need for infection control (9). This has made it extremely difficult for pregnant women to receive prenatal care (10), despite different studies suggesting that women's ANC should be prioritized during the COVID-19 pandemic to safeguard both mother and child health (11, 38, 39).

In the subgroup analysis, the highest percentage of adequate ANC service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed in Dire Dawa at 63%. This was higher than a previous study that found that ANC utilization during COVID-19 in Dire Dawa was 43.8% (26). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis conducted in this meta-analysis revealed that 45%, 39%, 56%, 28%, and 43% of the Amhara, Oromia, Sidama, SNNP, and Afar regions, respectively, had adequate ANC service utilization. All of these levels of adequate ANC service utilization were lower than those found in the corresponding regions of a prior study (26). There was only one study included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis for every region except the Amhara region. This led to a small sample size, which made it challenging to determine outcomes accurately and allowed chance to play an important role. The subgroup analysis in the Amhara region was 45%, which is comparable with the overall pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization in the current meta-analysis. This indicated that most of the studies included in this meta-analysis were conducted in the Amhara region. In studies conducted in health institutions, 67% of women had adequate ANC service utilization, whereas 42% of women had adequate ANC service utilization in community-based studies. This indicates that there are women who still live in the community that are unable to access ANC services. This revealed that studies conducted at health institutions overestimated outcomes, leading to inadequate community representation, a result of selection bias. In 2020, 2021, and 2022, the percentages of adequate ANC service utilization were 45%, 67%, and 21%, respectively. In 2020–2021, adequate ANC service utilization was 37%. This indicates that adequate ANC service utilization is decreasing annually in Ethiopia. In the sample size of <422, the magnitude of adequate ANC service utilization was 70%; on the other hand, in the sample size of ≥422, the magnitude of adequate ANC service utilization was 38%. The inclusion of a small number of studies that led to a high-role chance can be attributed to the high magnitude of adequate ANC service utilization in a sample size of <422.

Pregnant women who visited ANC services earlier were nearly 11 times more likely to have adequate ANC utilization than pregnant women who did not attend early ANC visits. Women with wanted and planned pregnancies were not significantly associated with adequate ANC service utilization. This could be due to the existence of a few studies to determine the association, which can be a cause for being unable to determine the association accurately.

The limitation and strength of the study

All of the included studies were cross-sectional, so exposure and disease status among individuals assessed at the same time could not clearly determine the temporal association of the factors. The findings of a cross-sectional study can be affected by recall bias and the non-response rate. A few regions in Ethiopia were not represented in this study, which hindered the generalization of the findings to all regions of Ethiopia. In the current study, adequate ANC was considered based on the quantity of ANC (at least four numbers of ANC), but it did not include the quality of ANC. The majority of the pooled odd ratios were computed from a small number of studies, such as two or three studies, which may not provide enough evidence to establish the casual relationship, although it is possible to synthesize meta-analyses utilizing these studies. A high level of heterogeneity was observed in some subgroup analyses of the Amhara region, a community-based study, the study year 2020, and a sample size >420. Variations in the socio-economic and cultural backgrounds of study participants may cause this significant heterogeneity, as these factors affected the utilization of health services. Moreover, the inaccessibility of health service delivery and variations in study methodology were other contributing factors for heterogeneity. On the other hand, in most of the regions, study years, institutional-based studies, and sample sizes less than 420, there is no heterogeneity due to the inclusion of a single or two studies in the subgroup analysis, making it impossible to detect the outcome accurately. The Egger test showed no plication bias, but inspection of the funnel plot indicated an asymmetric distribution of the included studies. The asymmetric nature of the funnel plot, which only depends on effect size and standard error, could be due to variations in the methodology of the included studies, inadequate analysis, and the role of chance. However, the quantitatively pooled adequate ANC service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was extensively addressed in this systematic review. Policymakers, health programmers, and other stakeholders can use the crucial evidence provided by this systematic review and meta-analysis to expand efforts aimed at increasing the uptake of adequate ANC service utilization. Recognizing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adequate ANC service utilization could help establish appropriate strategies and interventions for the improvement of adequate ANC service utilization.

Conclusion

The pooled estimate of adequate ANC service utilization after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was below half the percentage (46.28%). The subgroup analysis by the study year indicated that adequate ANC service utilization was decreasing year over year in Ethiopia. Pregnant women who visited their ANC earlier had higher adequate ANC service utilization than those who did not visit their ANC earlier. Thus, awareness of reproductive-age women focusing on early ANC visits is very important. Furthermore, more research should be done in the future in order to fully investigate factors influencing ANC coverage.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

TW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to all of the primary authors of the included studies in this review.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395190/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary File S1 | Checklist of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2020).

Supplementary File S2 | Comprehensive search strategy for adequate ANC.

Supplementary File S3 | Extracted data for adequate ANC.

Supplementary File S4 | The quality of included studies.

Abbreviations

COVID-19, coronavirus disease of 2019; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ANC, antenatal care; EDHS, Ethiopian demography health survey; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; SNNP, Southern Nation Nationality of People; WHO, World Health Organization; ES, effect size; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; S, supplementary.

References

1. WHO. Indicator Sheet Antenatal Care at Least Four Visites. Available at https://monitor.srhr.org/related-sheets/Monitor%20Indicator%20sheet%20Antenatal%20care%20at%20least%204%20visits.pdf (accessed August 5, 2024).

Google Scholar

2. Mbuagbaw L, Medley N, Darzi AJ, Richardson M, Habiba Garga K, Ongolo-Zogo P. Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 2015:Cd010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Medhanyie A, Spigt M, Kifle Y, Schaay N, Sanders D, Blanco R, et al. The role of health extension workers in improving utilization of maternal health services in rural areas in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. (2012) 12:352. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-352

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Health EMo. Ethiopian primary health care clinical guideline Implementation Manual 2017. Available at http://dataverse.nipn.ephi.gov.et/bitstream/handle/123456789/629/Ethiopian%20primary%20health%20care%20clinical%20guideline%20Implementation%20Manual%20June_18_2019.pdf?sequence=1/1000(accessed August 6, 2024).

Google Scholar

5. Sathian B, van Teijlingen E, Simkhada P. Integrated health service delivery and COVID-19. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:1008777. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1008777

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gamberini C, Angeli F, Knight L, Zaami M, Al-Nasiry S, Ambrosino E. Effect of COVID-19 on antenatal care: experiences of medical professionals in the Netherlands. Reprod Health. (2023) 20:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01587-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mularczyk-Tomczewska P, Zarnowski A, Gujski M, Jankowski M, Bojar I, Wdowiak A, et al. Barriers to accessing health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: a nationwide cross-sectional survey among 109,928 adults in Poland. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:986996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mrożek-Gasiorowska M, Tambor M. How COVID-19 has changed the utilization of different health care services in Poland. BMC Health Serv Res. (2024) 24:105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10554-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery. (2021) 98:102991. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Meaney S, Leitao S, Olander EK, Pope J, Matvienko-Sikar K. The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies. Women Birth. (2022) 35:307–16. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Alabi QK, Oyedeji AS, Kayode OO, Kajewole-Alabi DI. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mother and child health in Sub-Saharan Africa – a review. Pediatr Res. (2023) 94:1278–83. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02651-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Townsend R, Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 37:100947. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100947

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ariani N. Antenatal care services utilization during COVID-19 second wave attack in Pasuruan, Indonesia. J Med Life. (2022) 15:7–14. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Martin MM, Knobel R, Nandi V, Pereira JG, Trapani Junior A, Andreucci CB. Adequacy of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: observational study with postpartum women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. (2022) 44:398–408. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741450

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. de Guzman GS, Banal-Silao MJB. Antenatal care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional survey among Filipino women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2022) 22:929. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05234-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Aguilar-Rodríguez MA, Castro-Porras LV. COVID-19 and the adequacy of antenatal care among Indigenous women: a retrospective crossover analysis. Birth. (2024) 51:432–40. doi: 10.1111/birt.12799

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Amouzou A, Maïga A, Faye CM, Chakwera S, Melesse DY, Mutua MK, et al. Health service utilisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: a multicountry empirical assessment with a focus on maternal, newborn and child health services. BMJ Glob Health. (2022) 7:e008069. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008069

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Boguslawski SM, Joseph NT, Stanhope KK Ti AJ, Geary FH, Boulet SL. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal care utilization at a public hospital. Am J Perinatol. (2023) 40:1484–94. doi: 10.1055/a-1877-7951

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Semaan A, Annerstedt KS, Benová L, Dossou JP, Boyi Hounsou C, Agballa G, et al. Provision and utilization of maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in 16 hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa. Front Glob Womens Health. (2023) 4:1192473. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1192473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Raru TB, Ayana GM, Zakaria HF, Merga BT. Association of higher educational attainment on antenatal care utilization among pregnant women in east africa using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2010 to 2018: a multilevel analysis. Int J Womens Health. (2022) 14:67–77. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S350510

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Abeza D, Tayebwa B, Muhumuza J, Nabakka M, Ngonzi J. Impact of corona virus disease 2019 on antenatal care services in rural western Uganda; a retrospective study. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. (2024) 20:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100648

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Landrian A, Mboya J, Golub G, Moucheraud C, Kepha S, Sudhinaraset M. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on antenatal care utilisation in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e060185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060185

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mekonnen BD, Yirdaw BW. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of essential maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2023) 18:e0281260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yehualashet DE, Seboka BT, Tesfa GA, Mamo TT, Seid E. Determinants of optimal antenatal care visit among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of Ethiopian mini demographic health survey 2019 data. Reprod Health. (2022) 19:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01365-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Antehun D, Bizuayehu G. Assessment of Antenatal Care Service Utilization and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive Women Who Gave Birth the Last One Year in West Gojjam Zone District, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. (2023). Available at: https://www.medtextpublications.com/open-access/assessment-of-antenatal-care-service-utilization-and-its-associated-factors-1371.pdf (accessed February 14, 2024).

Google Scholar

26. Chipeta MG, Peterson MB, Vellemu R, Mohamed S, Mzembe T, Chifungo C, et al. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on maternal healthcare usage: evidence from routine health data in Kenya and Ethiopia. BMJ Public Health. (2023) 1:e000009. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tefera B, Tariku Z, Kebede M, Mohammed H. A comparative trend analysis of maternal and child health service utilization before and during Covid-19 at Dire Dawa administration public health facilities, Ethiopia, 2021. Research Square (2022). doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1348661/v1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Anggraeni MD, Setiyani R, Triyanto E, Iskandar A, Nani D, Fatoni A. Exploring the antenatal care challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas of Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2023) 23:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05495-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, Seidu A-A, Njue C. Impact of COVID-19 on maternal healthcare in Africa and the way forward. Arch Public Health. (2021) 79:1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00746-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Murewanhema G, Mpabuka E, Moyo E, Tungwarara N, Chitungo I, Mataruka K, et al. Accessibility and utilization of antenatal care services in sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review. Birth. (2023) 50:496–503. doi: 10.1111/birt.12719

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Tadesse E. Antenatal care service utilization of pregnant women attending antenatal care in public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Int J Womens Health. (2020) 12:1181–8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S287534

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Temesgen K, Wakgari N, Debelo BT, Tafa B, Alemu G, Wondimu F, et al. Maternal health care services utilization amidst COVID-19 pandemic in West Shoa zone, central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0249214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Bayked EM, Toleha HN, Kebede SZ, Workneh BD, Kahissay MH. The impact of community-based health insurance on universal health coverage in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Health Action. (2023) 16:2189764. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2189764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Fetene SM, Mengistu MY, Aschalew AY. Effectiveness and impact of community-based health insurance on health service utilization in northwest Ethiopia: a quasi-experimental evaluation. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1078462. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078462

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Seid A, Ahmed M. Association between health insurance enrolment and maternal health care service utilization among women in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:2329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12105-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Merga BT, Raru TB, Deressa A, Regassa LD, Gamachu M, Negash B, et al. The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilizations in Ethiopia: evidence from national survey. Front Health Serv. (2023) 3:1101164. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1101164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hasan MZ, Neill R, Das P, Venugopal V, Arora D, Bishai D, et al. Integrated health service delivery during COVID-19: a scoping review of published evidence from low-income and lower-middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. (2021) 6:e005667. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005667

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Shuka Z, Mebratie A, Alemu G, Rieger M, Bedi AS. Use of healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in urban Ethiopia: evidence from retrospective health facility survey data. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e056745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056745

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Groulx T, Bagshawe M, Giesbrecht G, Tomfohr-Madsen L, Hetherington E, Lebel CA. Prenatal care disruptions and associations with maternal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Glob Womens Health. (2021) 2:648428. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.648428

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. WHO. Antenatal care coverage. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/80 (accessed February 22, 2024).

Google Scholar

43. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. (2002) 21:1539–58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. (2001) 54:1046–55. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. (2000) 56:455–63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation. Int J Epidemiol. (2008) 37:1148–57. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Gelagay AA, Belachew TB, Asmamaw DB, Bitew DA, Fentie EA, Worku AG, et al. Inadequate receipt of ANC components and associated factors among pregnant women in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020–2021: a community-based cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. (2023) 20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01612-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Belay AT, Fenta SM, Birhan Biresaw H, Abebaw Moyehodie Y, Melkam Yelam M, et al. The magnitude of optimal antenatal care utilization and its associated factors among pregnant women in South Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Med. (2022) 2022:1415247. doi: 10.1155/2022/1415247

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Gedef GM, Girma B, Andualem F, Gashaw A, Tibebu NS. Antenatal care utilization and its determinants in fragile and conflict-affected situations in Sekota Zuria District, Northern Ethiopia, 2022: a community-based cross-sectional study. Midwifery. (2024) 129:103906. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Tizazu MA, Asefa EY, Muluneh MA, Haile AB. Utilizing a minimum of four antenatal care visits and associated factors in Debre Berhan town, North Shewa, Amhara, Ethiopia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2020) 2020:2783–91. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S285875

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Hailemariam T, Atnafu A, Gezie LD, Tilahun B. Utilization of optimal antenatal care, institutional delivery, and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:1071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28044-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Turi E, Tilahun T, Getachew M, Tesfaye T, Etana B, Abdisa E, et al. Antenatal care service utilization among women who gave birth amid COVID-19 pandemic in Wollega Zone, West Ethiopia: Community based cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Reprod Health. (2022) 14:12. doi: 10.69614/ejrh.v14i4.554

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Deressa LT, Regassa N. Antenatal care service utilization among women of recent delivery: analysis of the determi-nants of quality of care in selected health facilities in Burayu Town, Oromia. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. (2021) 2:1449. doi: 10.52768/2766-7820/1449

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Yoseph A, Teklesilasie W, Guillen-Grima F, Astatkie A. Individual-and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. Womens Health. (2023) 19:17455057231218195. doi: 10.1177/17455057231218195

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Belay A, Astatkie T, Abebaw S, Gebreamanule B, Enbeyle W. Prevalence and factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in rural areas of Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2022) 22:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04362-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Worku D, Teshome D, Tiruneh C, Teshome A, Berihun G, Berhanu L, et al. Antenatal care dropout and associated factors among mothers delivering in public health facilities of Dire Dawa Town, Eastern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2021) 21:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04107-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Urmale Mare K, Gebre Wuneh A, Shemsu Awol M, Ahmed Ibrahim M, Kahsay Hiluf M, Birara Aychiluhm S, et al. Factors affecting nonadherence to WHO's recommended antenatal care visits among women in pastoral community, Northeastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Nurs Res Pract. (2022) 2022:6120107. doi: 10.1155/2022/6120107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: adequate, antenatal care, service, utilization, Ethiopia

Citation: Wondmeneh TG and Solomon Tadesse Z (2024) Adequate antenatal care service utilizations after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Public Health 12:1395190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395190

Received: 03 March 2024; Accepted: 14 October 2024;
Published: 15 November 2024.

Edited by:

Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, ICAP in Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe

Reviewed by:

Matias Henriquez, University of Chile, Chile
Macarena Martínez Órdenes, University of Chile, Chile

Copyright © 2024 Wondmeneh and Solomon Tadesse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Temesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh, tomigeb2006@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.