Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 10 January 2024
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Prejudice and determinants regarding tuberculosis patients among medical students in Dalian, Northeast China: a cross-sectional study

  • School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China

Background: Health workers play a central role in global tuberculosis (TB) elimination efforts. If medical students have prejudiced attitudes toward TB patients, this may make it difficult for them to provide effective health care to TB patients in their future roles as health workers. There is currently no research on prejudice toward TB patients among medical students in China. This study aimed to explore the current status of medical students’ prejudice against patients with TB and its associated predictors.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among medical students at a medical university in Dalian, Liaoning Province, Northeast China. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the predictive factors of medical students’ prejudice against patients with TB.

Results: More than half (57.23%) of the medical students held prejudices against individuals with TB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that not receiving TB health education (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.35–3.32), not knowing a person with TB (OR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.39–4.56), and fear of TB/TB patients (OR: 6.79, 95% CI: 4.36–10.56) were identified as risk factors for medical students’ prejudice against TB patients. Conversely, residing in rural areas (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.95), agreeableness (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73–0.92) and emotional stability (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–1.00) in the Big Five personality traits, and a better understanding of TB knowledge (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38–0.89) were identified as protective factors.

Conclusion: In China, a considerable number of medical students still exhibit prejudice against patients with TB. Targeted interventions, such as incorporating TB health education into the core curriculum of medical students, and enhance their agreeableness and emotional stability, are still needed. Furthermore, greater focus should be placed on medical students from urban backgrounds or those who harbor fear or do not know a person with TB.

1 Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the second leading cause of death globally from a single infectious agent, following COVID-19, and causes nearly twice as many deaths as HIV/AIDS (1). It has been recognized as a global public health emergency for the past 25 years and has been named one of the six infectious diseases that threaten the world’s population (24). The World Health Organization (WHO) established a global target to eradicate TB by 2035. According to the WHO, China would continue to carry a substantial burden of TB in 2020, trailing only India, with 8.5% of the world’s TB cases. China’s future preventive and control situation is still dire to accomplish this goal (5, 6). Along with the need to concentrate on treatment and cure rates, a more holistic approach to disease control is now being promoted in order to address poverty, stigma, and other social risk factors, of which stigma, which is a major barrier to the global elimination of TB (7, 8), because it delays patient diagnosis and treatment. Studies in different backgrounds report that about 42–82% of TB patients suffer from stigma, while studies from China show that 45.32% of TB patients suffer from stigma (911). Reducing stigma is crucial for TB control.

Prejudice is an inadequate judgment used to define something or someone and establish an idea without prior knowledge and characterized by the affirmation of own identity as superior/dominant, and likewise, by the denial of the other who is different (12). Prejudice is the basis of stigma, which leads society to have negative attitudes toward infectious diseases and their victims and to isolate them (13). Fear-based policies (e.g., pre-emptive isolation, involuntary testing, etc.) have normalized biased perceptions of TB patients among health professionals and society at large by highlighting the serious threat that TB poses to the public, this has increased the burden of fighting TB, particularly in countries with a high TB burden, and the growing recognition that this approach is both ethically and scientifically indefensible (8, 14). Furthermore, when health workers have negative attitudes toward people with TB, it can lead to increased stigma against the disease throughout society, with wider socio-economic implications (15, 16). Perhaps there may be considerable ambivalence in the minds of health workers who, despite trying to help TB patients, retain prejudices and treat TB patients in a discriminatory manner, which can have a considerable impact on TB patients (17). The social manifestations of TB patients indicate that they are afraid of stigma due to prejudice among health workers and the public, and therefore act in secrecy about the disease (18, 19). Medical students, as the reserve force of health workers, may come into contact with TB patients in the future, and their attitude toward patients is also related to the treatment results of patients. It is crucial to lessen medical students’ prejudice toward TB patients, and attention should be paid to the problem of medical students’ prejudice toward TB patients as well as the creation of interventions.

A small number of studies have been conducted to determine the factors associated with prejudice against people with TB. Several socio-demographic characteristics, such as age, gender, socio-economic status, differences in TB health education and educational environment among medical schools, as well as beliefs and lack of knowledge about TB transmission, are important factors influencing prejudice against TB patients (2025).

To the best of our knowledge, in Dalian, Liaoning province, China, there have been no studies on prejudice toward TB patients among medical students have been conducted. In this study, we aimed to understand the factors associated with medical students’ prejudice toward TB patients, to effectively reduce the prejudice of these future health workers toward TB patients.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area, study design and study period

Dalian is an economically developed coastal city in Liaoning Province, Northeast China, covering an area of 12,574 square kilometers, and is an important port, industrial, trade, financial, and tourist city in China. The per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of Dalian was 113,200 yuan in 2022, ranking first in Liaoning Province, and the city’s household population was 6,087,000 as of the end of 2022. According to the statutory report of Liaoning Province, the incidence rate of TB in 2018 was 55.81/100,000, and the mortality rate was 0.49/100,000 ranking fourth in the country (26). In addition, according to a recent study, more than half of TB patients in Dalian hold a sense of disease shame due to differential treatment by health workers as well as family and friends (27). As future health workers, medical students’ attitudes toward TB patients may also influence public perceptions of patients. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of medical students from March 2022–June 2022 at the only public comprehensive medical university in Dalian.

2.2 Participants

Most studies in China tend to define undergraduate medical students as undergraduate students enrolled in an undergraduate medical school and majoring in a medical-related specialty (2833). The subjects of the study were first- to fourth-year medical undergraduates from various medical specialties at Dalian Medical University. During the study period, there were 7,916 medical students in their first to fourth year of university, including the Department of Clinical Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Department of Nursing, Department of Health Management, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Department of Clinical Medicine of Chinese and Western Medicine, and Department of Stomatology (34, 35). University faculty and staff, medical students who had graduated with an undergraduate degree, non-medical students, and medical students who did not sign informed consent were excluded from this study. High school graduates from all over China were admitted only if they passed the entrance examination and met the admission criteria of Dalian Medical University.

2.3 Sample size and sampling technique

Since there is no similar study in the target group in our study area, the sample size was determined by a single proportion formula using (36): N = Z2*P(1–P)/d2; where Z = 1.96, p = 50%, d = 0.05, accordingly the sample size will be 384. Since the total population of medical students on campus in their first to the fourth year of university is 7,916, adjustment was made by the following formula nf = ni/[1 + (ni/N)] (37); where nf is the sample size calculated by adjustment, ni is the initial sample size calculated by single proportion formula (384), N is the total number of students in the campus (7916). Based on this formula the sample size for this study was 366. The sample size was increased by 50% to minimize the effect of sampling error. A simple random sampling technique was used to distribute the 549 paper questionnaires proportionally to medical students of all years. The final number of valid questionnaires returned was 505, with a return rate of 92%.

2.4 Data collection

The data was collected through a structured questionnaire designed by the researcher. The questionnaire was designed based on extensive reference to relevant literature and consultation with experts in the field. To ensure that respondents accurately understood the meaning of each item in the questionnaire, a pre-survey was conducted at the study site and the questionnaire was modified accordingly. Five categories made up the questionnaire: socio-demographic characteristics, Big Five personality, knowledge of TB, fear and prejudice toward people with TB. Sociodemographic characteristics included gender, age, place of residence, grade level, whether they had received health education about TB and whether they know a person with TB. All participants signed an informed consent form.

2.4.1 Scale for prejudice against people with TB

The scale to measure prejudice against TB patients was designed with reference to TB stigma measurement guidelines and related literature (38). The scale demonstrated adequate reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.87, KMO = 0.84) and results from a one-factor confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit (x2/df = 5.079, NFI = 0.983, AGFI = 0.933, IFI = 0.962, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.965, RMR = 0.026) (39). Each item on the scale has six response options:1 (strongly disagree), 2 (moderately disagree), 3 (somewhat disagree), 4 (somewhat agree), 5 (moderately agree), and 6 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 6 to 36, with higher scores reflecting more severe prejudice. As for the judging criteria of the scale cut-off value, this scale refers to the study of Jittimanee SX et al., the median score of the study population was used as the cut-off value for the scale (40). Respondents with a total personal prejudice score greater than or equal to the median score were classified as prejudiced against TB patients, while respondents with a total personal prejudice score below the median score were classified as non-prejudiced against TB patients.

2.4.2 Fear of TB/TB patients scale

We developed a 4-item measure to assess medical students’ fear of TB/TB patients. The scale has good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.71, KMO = 0.69) and results from a one-factor confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit (x2/df = 2.018, NFI = 0.995, AGFI = 0.980, IFI = 0.997, CFI = 0.997, TLI = 0.984, RMR = 0.005). Each item on the scale has four response options:1 (strongly disagree), 2 (disagree), 3 (agree) and 4 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 4 to 16, with higher scores reflecting more severe fears. This scale refers to the study of Jittimanee SX et al., the median score of the study population was used as the cut-off value for the scale (40). Respondents with a total personal fear score greater than or equal to the median score were classified as fearful of TB/TB patients, while respondents with a total personal fear score below the median score were classified as non-fearful of TB/TB patients.

2.4.3 Ten-item personality inventory (TIPI-C)

Several scales have been developed and validated to measure personality traits (41). Nevertheless, due to a large number of entries, it takes a long time to accurately measure personality (42).To lighten the load of the response, several shorter instruments have been developed, such as the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI), the 60-item New Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the 100 Trait Descriptive Adjectives(TDA) (41, 43). The BFI, NEO-FFI and TDA have been reported to take approximately 5, 15 and 15 min to complete, and these instruments are still considered too long for use in large-scale population surveys, in addition to the fact that medical students are often under pressure to study and have limited time, making the use of the shortest Big Five Personality Inventory (TIPI-C) more appropriate for this study (4446). The scale was developed with Chinese socio-cultural characteristics in mind and contains 10 items with 5 dimensions: agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, openness and emotional stability, when calculating the dimensional scores (i.e., the average score of two items), one of the items needs to be reverse coded (e.g., on a 7-point scale, the score changes from “7” to “1” and vice versa) (47). Reverse-coded items are 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, with higher scores indicating higher levels of testing. Previous studies have shown that the intrinsic reliability of the scale is less optimistic, probably due to the small number of entries for each dimension, but it has good retest reliability and validity and still has value for application (48).

2.4.4 Knowledge of TB

TB knowledge is mainly aimed at transmission and consists of the following five questions: (I) How is TB transmitted? (II) what is the main route of transmission of TB (III) Can all TB patients be transmitted to others? (IV) How long can the infectivity of ordinary pulmonary TB patients be significantly weakened or disappeared after general treatment? (V) TB can generally be spread through the patient’s clothing and blankets. Get 1 point for each correct answer. Respondents with a total personal knowledge score greater than or equal to the median score were classified as having good knowledge of TB transmission, while those with a total personal knowledge score below the median score were classified as having poor knowledge of TB transmission (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Knowledge about TB among medical students.

2.5 Statistical analysis

After the questionnaire, which was collected on-site, was checked for completeness and correctness, the original data were entered into a database in EpiData 3.1 (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) software using double entry, and consistency was assessed, then exported to Stata version 16.0 (Stata Corp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA) and AMOS16.0 for analysis. Shapiro–Wilk was first used to test the normality of the data studied, and the results showed that the data studied did not follow a normal distribution, so we analysed the median and quartiles of the continuous data and the frequencies and percentages of the categorical data. Continuous variables were compared using the rank sum test to assess differences between the two groups. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test to assess differences between the two groups. Variables with p-values<0.10 were incorporated into a multiple logistic regression analysis, correcting for confounding factors while ensuring that more valuable information was included in the model to identify factors that contribute to medical students’ prejudice against TB patients. All comparisons were bilateral, and p-values<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression.

3 Results

3.1 Sociodemographic characteristics and their relationship to TB prejudice

The average age of the 505 medical students participating in the study was 20.07 ± 1.50 years, more than half of the medical students (60.40%) were female, the majority of medical students (70.10%) were from urban areas, the largest proportion was in their fourth year of university (26.14%), nearly two-thirds of the medical students (61.78%) had received health education on TB, and most medical students (84.55%) do not know a person with TB. More than half of medical students (57.23%) have a prejudice against people with TB. The univariate analysis showed that medical students whose families lived in urban areas and who did not know a person with TB were more likely to be prejudiced against people with TB, and those who had received health education on TB were less likely to be prejudiced against people with TB (All p-values<0.1) (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics of the medical students and their relationships with TB-related prejudice.

3.2 The relationship between Big Five personality and TB prejudice

Since the data did not follow a normal distribution, we utilized medians and quartiles to describe the Big Five personality scores of medical students with and without prejudice against TB patients. For extraversion, the median score was 4.00, with a range of 3.00–5.00 (25th to 75th percentile), there was no statistically significant difference in relation to prejudice against TB patients (p-values =0.767). Regarding agreeableness, the median score was 5.00, with a range of 4.50–6.00 (25–75th percentile), it exhibited a significant negative correlation with prejudice against TB patients (p-values <0.001), indicating that students with higher desirability scores were less likely to harbor prejudice. For conscientiousness, the median score was 4.50, with a range of 3.50–5.00 (25–75th percentile), there was no statistically significant difference concerning prejudice against TB patients (p-values = 0.088). Regarding emotional stability, the median score was 4.50, with a range of 3.50–5.00 (25–75th percentile), there was a significant negative correlation with prejudice against TB patients (p-values < 0.001), suggesting that students with higher emotional stability scores were less likely to exhibit prejudice. In terms of openness to experiences, the median score of 4.50 with a range of 4.00–5.50 (25–75th percentile) was significantly and negatively correlated with prejudice against TB patients (p-values =0.004), indicating that students with higher openness scores were less likely to hold prejudice against TB patients (All p-values < 0.1) (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The distribution of the Big Five personality traits by prejudice stage.

3.3 The relationship between fear of TB/TB patients, knowledge of TB and prejudice against TB patients

Almost two-thirds (62.57%) of the medical students included in the study were fearful of TB/TB patients and almost half (45.54%) had poor knowledge of TB transmission. The univariate analysis showed that medical students who have a fear of TB/TB patients and a poor knowledge of TB transmission are more likely to have a prejudice against TB patients (All p-values < 0.1) (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. TB knowledge, prejudice and fear in medical students.

3.4 Multiple logistic regression analysis of independent influences on medical students’ prejudice against TB patients

According to the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that medical students who did not receive TB health education were 2.12 times (95% CI:1.35–3.32) more likely to hold prejudices against TB patients compared to those who received such education. Medical students who did not know a person with TB were 2.52 times (95% CI:1.39–4.56) more likely to hold prejudices against TB patients compared to those who knew TB patients. Additionally, medical students who fear TB/TB patients were 6.79 times (95% CI:4.36–10.56) more likely to hold prejudices against them compared to those who did not fear TB. Furthermore, the study revealed that residing in rural areas (OR: 0.60, 95% CI:0.38–0.95), higher levels of agreeableness (OR: 0.68, 95% CI:0.54–0.85) and emotional stability (OR: 0.80, 95% CI:0.65–0.99), and having a better understanding of TB knowledge (OR: 0.58, 95% CI:0.38–0.89) were significant protective factors associated with a lower likelihood of holding prejudices against TB patients (All p-values<0.05) (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Multiple logistic regression model to determine the factors associated with TB-related prejudice.

4 Discussion

This study aimed to determine the factors influencing medical students’ prejudice toward patients with TB. More than half of the medical students in this study (57.23%) had prejudiced attitudes toward TB patients, lower than a study conducted in China on public stigma against TB patients, which showed about 71.9% had stigmatizing attitudes toward TB patients (49). Compared to the rest of the international, with results similar to those of a study conducted in Ethiopia (56%) (21), higher than India (51%) (16), and lower than in The Gambia (77%) (50). This difference may be related to the study design and regional context. Due to the high rate of prejudice against TB patients among medical students, interventions to reduce the prejudice of medical students against TB patients are necessary.

In our study that TB health education may reduce medical students’ prejudice against TB patients. This is understandable, students who had received TB health education tended to have a more accurate understanding of TB and therefore their prejudice against TB patients may be reduced. A study in Malaysia illustrated once again the importance of received TB health education improving attitudes toward TB patients (51). Moreover, this study found that nearly half of the medical students (45.54%) had poor knowledge of TB transmission. Medical students who were well informed about TB transmission were more likely to be free of prejudice toward TB patients. Perhaps as scholars such as Royce have mentioned, those with more knowledge, especially about infectiousness, were considered less likely to avoid or have negative attitudes toward TB patients (52). This reminds us that more emphasis should be placed on knowledge about infectiousness in future TB health education to better improve medical students’ prejudice against TB patients.

Our study found that knowing a person with TB played an important role in reducing prejudice against people with TB. One possible explanation is that exposure experiences help people to understand the feelings and worldview of the stigmatized group, thereby increasing empathy for the stigmatized group and reducing prejudice (53). Studies have shown that people who receive information about TB from people with TB have less prejudice against people with TB (20). Similarly, other studies also found a significant gap between whether relatives have TB and their understanding of TB (54). These findings suggest via learning about the patients’ own experiences, for example, by watching films based on the experiences of TB patients or by involving successfully treated patients as trainers in TB health education may be an effective way of reaching out to arouse people’s empathy toward patients and improve attitudes toward TB patients (5557). At present, the common forms of TB health education for university students in China are mainly classroom lectures and special lectures (58). This suggest an interactive session with TB patients (if they are willing to reveal their identity) could be added to future TB health education for students. Such interactive sessions most commonly involve asking a recovered TB patient who has experienced stigma to act as a trainer or speaker, Talk about their own experiences of prejudice and its effects, etc., thus fostering empathy in medical students and reducing prejudice against patients.

Unexpectedly, the degree of prejudice against TB patients may vary by place of residence. Medical students who lived in rural areas were more likely to be less prejudiced against TB patients than those who lived in urban areas. Similar results were found in a study in Nigeria (59). In China, the incidence of TB tends to be higher in rural areas than in urban areas (60), and TB patients are more common in rural than in urban areas, meaning that rural residents are more likely to be exposed to TB patients and more aware of the disease, thus making them less prejudiced against TB patients than urban residents. Consequently, when developing interventions related to TB prejudice, it could be beneficial to concentrate on those medical students whose families reside in urban regions.

Fear of TB/TB patients was considered to be an important factor associated with prejudice against TB patients (20). Our analysis found that medical students who fear TB/TB patients are more likely to hold prejudicial attitudes toward TB patients. Previous studies have shown that medical staff’s fear of TB/TB patients leads them to maintain a certain distance and bias toward patients (18). Excessive fear of TB patients can lead health workers to adopt protective measures when dealing with TB patients, far outpacing the actual health risks of TB patients and increasing the stigma of TB patients (61, 62). Given the close correlation between prejudice and fear, there is an urgent need for an effective set of interventions to reduce fear of the disease, and more attention should be paid to medical students who may fear TB/TB patients.

In terms of the Big Five personality traits, this study shows that medical students who have more Emotional Stability and Agreeableness are more likely to be less prejudiced against people with TB. Those with a personality bias toward agreeableness tended to be considerate, friendly, generous, helpful and willing to compromise their interests with others (63). On the other hand, lower Agreeableness is often hostile and distrustful of others, which may distance oneself from the perceived threat of illness (64). This may make more agreeable people have a positive attitude toward TB patients so that they are less likely to be biased against TB patients. People who are more emotionally stable usually have a clear personality trait of being calm, relaxed, content with themselves and inclined to be pro-social, caring for the welfare of others, and often less self-interested (6567), and it is perhaps this personality trait that makes them less likely to have a prejudiced attitude toward people with TB. Nonetheless, there is no literature on the impact of different personality traits on the level of prejudice among TB patients, but a recent study found that people with a personality bias toward emotional stability and agreeableness held less negative attitudes toward people with mental illness (68), a finding similar to our study. Brown suggests that using personality traits as a screening tool for healthcare providers may alleviate stigma in TB patients (69). Integrating personality modification interventions into educational programs for medical students might improve the attitude to TB patients. Future research still needs to explore personality trait-based interventions, which are important to improve medical students’ attitudes toward TB patients.

There are several limitations in the current study that must be mentioned. Firstly, this study is cross-sectional, which limits the establishment of causal relationships between variables, that a longitudinal study is needed. Secondly, we only conducted a quantitative analysis and not a qualitative one. Thirdly, other variables, such as the literacy level of the parents of medical students and the economic status of their families, may also influence medical students’ prejudice against TB patients, which was not addressed in our study. Finally, this study was conducted in only one medical school within Dalian. Due to regional differences in background, the results of the study cannot be generalized to other areas, and the results obtained are only representative of areas with the same conditions. Future research should include expanding the population, enriching the survey methodology, adding influencing factors, and different regions.

5 Conclusion

This study aimed to explore the current status of medical students’ prejudice against TB patients and its associated predictors. Our study found that medical students who are more agreeable and emotionally stable, have a good knowledge of TB transmission, and have a rural home are more likely to be less prejudiced against TB patients. However, medical students who had not received health education about TB, did not know a person with TB, and had a fear of TB/TB patients were more likely to have prejudiced attitudes toward TB patients. Consequently, interventions to reduce medical students’ prejudice against TB patients should allocate more resources to medical students whose families live in urban areas, who have not received TB health education, who do not know people with TB and who have a fear of TB/TB patients. Besides, the importance of medical students’ agreeableness and emotional stability, and their role in receiving TB health education and acquiring knowledge about TB transmission, should be emphasized to reduce medical students’ prejudice against TB patients. Medical students, who as a reserve of health workers, when seeing people with TB as ‘normal’, have the potential to change the public perception of the disease and improve public attitudes toward people with TB in the future.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The Ethical Committee of Dalian Medical University approved this study. Before the investigation, the students were informed of the purpose of the study and the presentation of the results, and they were assured that their personal information would not be disclosed. All students signed informed consent forms in our study.

Author contributions

YaY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MS: Writing – review & editing. XC: Writing – review & editing. YP: Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – review & editing. YiY: Writing – review & editing. XD: Writing – review & editing. LZ: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the student of Dalian Medical University for their cooperation in carrying out this research. We thank data collectors and supervisors for their commitment. We would be remiss if we did not thank the students who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

TB, Tuberculosis; WHO, World Health Organization; RC, Reference category; OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS, Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; BFI, Big Five Inventory; TDA, Trait Descriptive Adjectives; TIPI-C, A Chinese version of the Ten-item personality inventory; P25-P75, 25th to 75th percentile.

References

1. Adam, T, Baddeley, A, Bastard, M, den Boon, S, Dean, A, Dennis,, et al. WHO's global tuberculosis report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization (2023). 14 p.

Google Scholar

2. Furin, J, Cox, H, and Pai, M. Tuberculosis. Lancet. (2019) 393:1642–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30308-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Nathavitharana, RR, and Friedland, JS. A tale of two global emergencies: tuberculosis control efforts can learn from the Ebola outbreak. Eur Respir J. (2015) 46:293–6. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00436-2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mokhtar, KS, Rahman, N, and Shariff, N. Tuberculosis in Malaysia: a study on the level of societal awareness and stigma. Soc Sci Med. (2012) 1:59–64.

Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021: supplementary material. Global tuberculosis report 2021: supplementary material. Geneva: World Health Organization (2022).

Google Scholar

6. Li, H, Ge, M, and Zhang, M. Spatio-temporal distribution of tuberculosis and the effects of environmental factors in China. BMC Infect Dis. (2022) 22:565. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07539-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. World Health Organization. The global plan to stop TB, 2006–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization (2006).

Google Scholar

8. Daftary, A, Mitchell, EMH, Reid, MJA, Fekadu, E, and Goosby, E. To end TB, first-ever high-level meeting on tuberculosis must address stigma. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. (2018) 99:1114–6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Abioye, IA, Omotayo, MO, and Alakija, W. Socio-demographic determinants of stigma among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Lagos, Nigeria African. Health Sci. (2011) 11 Suppl 1:S100–4. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v11i3.70078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kurspahic-Mujcic, A, Hasanovic, A, and Sivic, S. Tuberculosis related stigma and delay in seeking care after the onset of symptoms associated with tuberculosis. Med Glas. (2013) 10:272–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

11. Xu, M, Markstrom, U, Lyu, J, and Xu, L. Survey on tuberculosis patients in rural areas in China: tracing the role of stigma in psychological distress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2017) 14:1171. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bandeira, L, and Batista, AS. Preconceito e discriminação como expressões de violência. Rev Estud Fem. (2002) 10:119–41. doi: 10.1590/S0104-026X2002000100007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Onur Fevzi ERER. Tüberküloz ve Damgalanma: Toplumsal Bakış Toraks Bülteni. (2014) 1:54–7.

Google Scholar

14. Macintyre, K, Bakker, MI, Bergson, S, Bhavaraju, R, Bond, V, Chikovore, J, et al. Defining the research agenda to measure and reduce tuberculosis stigmas. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2017) 21:87–96. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dodor, E. Health professionals expose TB patients to stigmatization in society: insights from communities in an urban district in Ghana. Ghana Med J. (2008) 42:144–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Pardeshi, GS, Kadam, D, Chandanwale, A, Bollinger, R, and Deluca, A. Resident doctors’ attitudes toward tuberculosis patients. Indian J Tubercul. (2017) 64:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2016.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Macq, J, Solis, A, Martinez, G, Martiny, P, and Dujardin, B. An exploration of the social stigma of tuberculosis in five “municipios” of Nicaragua to reflect on local interventions. Health Policy. (2005) 74:205–17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Rodrigues, ILA, Motta, MCS, and Ferreira, MA. Social representations of nurses on tuberculosis. Rev Bras Enferm. (2016) 69:532–7. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690316i

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rodrigues, ILA, and de Souza, MJ. Representações sociais de clientes sobre a tuberculose: desvendar para melhor cuidar. Escola Anna Nery Revista de Enfermagem. (2005) 9:80–7.

Google Scholar

20. Jaramillo, E. Tuberculosis and stigma: predictors of prejudice against people with tuberculosis. J Health Psychol. (1999) 4:71–9. doi: 10.1177/135910539900400101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Deribew, A, Abebe, G, Apers, L, Jira, C, Tesfaye, M, Shifa, J, et al. Prejudice and misconceptions about tuberculosis and HIV in rural and urban communities in Ethiopia: a challenge for the TB/HIV control program. BMC Public Health. (2010) 10:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Beser, A, Bahar, Z, Haney, MO, Aydogdu, NG, Gurkan, KP, Arkan, G, et al. Cultural attitudes of society towards tuberculosis patients: a qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc. (2018) 68:1060–4.

Google Scholar

23. Vaz, M, Travasso, SM, and Vaz, M. Perceptions of stigma among medical and nursing students and tuberculosis and diabetes patients at a teaching hospital in southern India. Indian J Med Ethics. (2016) 1:8–16. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2016.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Berg-Johnsen, A, Hadem, SO, Tamrakar, D, and Harstad, I. A questionnaire of knowledge, attitude and practices on tuberculosis among medical interns in Nepal. J Clin Tubercul Other Mycobact Dis. (2020) 20:100173. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Mi, JY. Effect of knowledge and perception of tuberculosis on social stigma for tuberculosis patients among nursing students. Korean J Saf Cult. (2022) 15:13–25. doi: 10.52902/kjsc.2022.15.13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Commission NH. National Health Commission of the People’s republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook, Beijing: China Union Medical University Press (2022).

Google Scholar

27. Chen, X, Du, L, Wu, R, Xu, J, Ji, H, Zhang, Y, et al. Tuberculosis-related stigma and its determinants in Dalian, Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10055-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lian, Y, Yan, Y, Ping, W, Dou, Z, Wang, X, and Yang, H. Knowledge and coping style about depression in medical students: a cross-sectional study in China. PLoS One (2023);18 293511, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293511

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Cheng, J, Liao, M, He, Z, Xiong, R, Ju, Y, Liu, J, et al. Mental health and cognitive function among medical students after the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1233975. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wu, S, Li, Z, Li, Z, Xiang, W, Yuan, Y, Liu, Y, et al. The mental state and risk factors of Chinese medical staff and medical students in early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic. Compr Psychiatry. (2020) 102:152202. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Liu, H, Zhou, Z, Tao, X, Huang, L, Zhu, E, Yu, L, et al. Willingness and influencing factors to receive COVID-19 vaccination among Chinese medical students. Front Public Health. (2022):10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.869838

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ding, P, Li, J, Chen, H, Zhong, C, Ye, X, and Shi, H. Independent and joint effects of sleep duration and sleep quality on suboptimal self-rated health in medical students: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.957409

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wang, Q, Wang, L, Shi, M, Li, X, Liu, R, Liu, J, et al. Empathy, burnout, life satisfaction, correlations and associated socio-demographic factors among Chinese undergraduate medical students: an exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. (2019) 19, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1788-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Yang, H, Pu, S, Lu, Y, Luo, W, Zhao, J, Liu, E, et al. Migraine among students of a medical college in western China: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Med Res. (2022) 27:27. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00698-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Liu, H, Zhou, Z, Tao, X, Huang, L, Zhu, E, Yu, L, et al. Willingness and influencing factors to receive COVID-19 vaccination among Chinese medical students. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:869838.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Wald, A. Sequential analysis. New York: Annals of Mathematical Statistics (1945).

Google Scholar

37. Lwanga, SK, and Lemeshow, S. Sample size determination in health studies: A practical manual. Geneva: World Health Organization (1991).

Google Scholar

38. Craig, G, Meershoek, A, Zwerling, A, Daftary, A, Citro, B, Smyth, C, et al. TB stigma–measurement guidance (2018).

Google Scholar

39. Dhanani, LY, and Franz, B. The role of news consumption and trust in public health leadership in shaping COVID-19 knowledge and prejudice. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:2812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560828

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Jittimanee, SX, Nateniyom, S, Kittikraisak, W, Burapat, C, Akksilp, S, Chumpathat, N, et al. Social stigma and knowledge of tuberculosis and HIV among patients with both diseases in Thailand. PLoS One. (2009) 4:e6360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Costa, PT Jr, and McCrae, RRJO. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor (NEO-FFI) inventory professional manual. Behav Genet. (1992).

Google Scholar

42. Gosling, SD, Rentfrow, PJ, and Swann, WB Jr. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers. (2003) 37:504–28. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Goldberg, LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess. (1992) 4:26–42. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Shi, Z, Li, S, and Chen, G. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of ten-item personality inventory (TIPI) among medical college students. Psychol Res Behav Manag. (2022) 15:1247–58. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wu, WZ, Ma, X, Liu, YL, Qi, QQ, Guo, ZC, Li, SJ, et al. Empathy alleviates the learning burnout of medical college students through enhancing resilience. BMC Med Educ. (2022) 22, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03554-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. John, OP, and Srivastava, S. The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Ann Medico Psychol. (1999).

Google Scholar

47. Lu, J. Reliability of the Chinese version of the 10-item Big Five Personality Inventory (TIPI-C). Chin J Health Psychol. (2013) 21:1688–92. doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2013.11.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. LI L, Zhang, M, Zhao, W, Wang, W, and Li, X. Reliability analysis of the Chinese version of the 10-item Big Five Personality Inventory in breast cancer patients. Nurs Res (2019);33:970–973.

Google Scholar

49. Lu, SH, Tian, BC, Kang, XP, Zhang, W, Meng, XP, Zhang, JB, et al. Public awareness of tuberculosis in China: a national survey of 69 253 subjects. Int J Tubercul Lung Dis. (2009) 13:1493–9.

Google Scholar

50. Bashorun, AO, Linda, C, Omoleke, S, Kendall, L, Donkor, SD, Kinteh, M-A, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards tuberculosis in Gambia: a nation-wide cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09685-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Idris, NA, Zakaria, R, Muhamad, R, Husain, NRN, Ishak, A, and Mohammad, WMZW. The effectiveness of tuberculosis education programme in Kelantan, Malaysia on knowledge, attitude, practice and stigma towards tuberculosis among adolescents. Malaysian J Med Sci. (2020) 27:102–14. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.6.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Royce, RA, Colson, PW, Woodsong, C, Swinson-Evans, T, Walton, W, Maiuri, A, et al. Tuberculosis knowledge, awareness, and stigma among African-Americans in three southeastern counties in the USA: a qualitative study of community perspectives. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. (2017) 4:47–58. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0200-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pettigrew, TF, Tropp, LR, Wagner, U, and Christ, O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int J Intercult Relat. (2011) 35:271–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hall, J, Kabir, TM, Shih, P, and Degeling, C. Insights into culturally appropriate latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening in NSW: perspectives of Indian and Pakistani migrants. Aust N Z J Public Health. (2020) 44:353–9. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Flanagan, EH, Buck, T, Gamble, A, Hunter, C, Sewell, I, and Davidson, L. “Recovery speaks”: a photovoice intervention to reduce stigma among primary care providers. Psychiatr Serv. (2016) 67:566–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Kamineni, VV, Turk, T, Wilson, N, Satyanarayana, S, and Chauhan, LS. A rapid assessment and response approach to review and enhance advocacy, communication and social mobilisation for tuberculosis control in Odisha state, India. BMC Public Health. (2011) 11:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Delmas, MV, Soan, M, Khirikoekkong, N, Aung, KK, Ler Wah, S, Htun, WPP, et al. Under the mask: a film on tuberculosis at the Thai-Myanmar border. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.795503

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wang, M, Wu, M, and Wang, L. Survey on core knowledge of tuberculosis prevention and control among university students in Hangzhou. Zhejiang Prev Med. (2014) 26:1284–5+91. doi: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2014.12.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Oladele, DA, Balogun, MR, Odeyemi, K, and Salako, BL. A comparative study of knowledge, attitude, and determinants of tuberculosis-associated stigma in rural and urban communities of Lagos State, Nigeria. Tubercul Res Treat. (2020) 2020:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2020/1964759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhu, B, Liu, J, Fu, Y, Zhang, B, and Mao, Y. Spatio-temporal epidemiology of viral hepatitis in China (2003–2015): implications for prevention and control policies. Int J Environ Res Public Health, Olso:. (2018) 15:661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Ziyada, MM. Exploring tuberculosis related stigma in Khartoum-Sudan: a qualitative study, Olso: University of Oslo (2010).

Google Scholar

62. Dodor, EA, Kelly, S, and Neal, K. Health professionals as stigmatisers of tuberculosis: insights from community members and patients with TB in an urban district in Ghana. Psychol Health Med. (2009) 14:301–10. doi: 10.1080/13548500902730127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Khodarahimi, S, and Rezaye, AM. The effects of psychopathology and personality on substance abuse in twelve-step treatment programme abstainers, opiate substance abusers and a control sample. Heroin Addict Relat Clin Probl. (2012) 14:35–48.

Google Scholar

64. Mortensen, CR, Becker, DV, Ackerman, JM, Neuberg, SL, and Kenrick, DT. Infection breeds reticence: the effects of disease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral avoidance tendencies. Psychol Sci. (2010) 21:440–7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. McCrae, RR, and Costa, PT. Osobowość dorosłego człowieka: perspektywa teorii pięcioczynnikowej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM (2005).

Google Scholar

66. Pruysers, S. Personality and attitudes towards refugees: evidence from Canada. J Elect Public Opin Parties. (2020) 33, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2020.1824187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Zawadzki, B, Strelau, J, Szczepaniak, P, and Śliwińska, M. Inwentarz osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Adaptacja polska Podręcznik Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP (1998).

Google Scholar

68. Wolska, A, and Malina, A. Personality and attitudes towards people with mental disorders: preliminary studies results. Int J Soc Psychiatry. (2020) 66:270–8. doi: 10.1177/0020764020906433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Brown, SA. The contribution of previous contact and personality traits to severe mental illness stigma. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. (2012) 15:274–89. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2012.703553

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: tuberculosis, prejudice, student, associated factors, China

Citation: Yi Y, Sun M, Chen X, Pan Y, Lu J, Yu Y, Dou X and Zhou L (2024) Prejudice and determinants regarding tuberculosis patients among medical students in Dalian, Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health. 11:1292333. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1292333

Received: 28 September 2023; Accepted: 26 December 2023;
Published: 10 January 2024.

Edited by:

Yousef Khader, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan

Reviewed by:

Barathan Muttiah, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Ephrem Tora, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia

Copyright © 2024 Yi, Sun, Chen, Pan, Lu, Yu, Dou and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ling Zhou, emhvdWxpbmcwNjA5QDE2My5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.