Skip to main content

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND PEDAGOGY article

Front. Public Health, 15 September 2023
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic Flipped classroom or flipped learning in health professionals' education View all 5 articles

Application of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning in Introduction to Environmental Health Science

You Li,&#x;You Li1,2Liang Cao,&#x;Liang Cao2,3Huixia Zhang,Huixia Zhang1,2Weiyi Pang,Weiyi Pang1,2Yan Sun,Yan Sun1,2Zhiyong Zhang,
Zhiyong Zhang1,2*
  • 1Department of Environmental Health and Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, China
  • 2The Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposomics and Entire Lifecycle Heath, Guilin, Guangxi, China
  • 3Department of Experimental Teaching Center, School of Public Health, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, China

Objectives: To explore the effect of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning in Introduction to Environmental Health Science for the Master of Public Health (MPH).

Methods: The MPH Master’s class of 2022 was selected as the experimental group at Guilin Medical University from September to December 2022, and the flipped classroom combined with the case-based learning was adopted. The class of 2021 was the control group, and we taught them with the traditional teaching method. A self-designed questionnaire and academic performance were used to evaluate the teaching effects of the two groups.

Results: There was no difference in the paper score between grades 2022 and 2021, and the design question score of grade 2022 was higher than that of grade 2021. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The students in grade 2022 had a high overall recognition of the teaching effect of the flipped classroom combined with case-based learning in Introduction to Environmental Health Science.

Conclusion: The teaching method of the flipped classroom combined with case-based learning is more suitable than the traditional teaching method in the Introduction to Environmental Health Science for MPH. It can stimulate the independent learning ability of MPH students and improve their ability to use knowledge and an innovative spirit.

Introduction

The State Council issued “the trial rules on the professional degree of Public Health [degrees (2001) ninth],” allowing colleges and universities to recruit Master of Public Health from 2002 at the government level. Furthermore, full-time MPH enrollment began in 2009. MPH has become the focus of public health education in China in recent years. After more than 10 years of development, MPH education has achieved great-leap-forward development in China (1).

The existing education mode of MPH is rooted in academic mastery mode, showing a similar trend of “theorization,” which led to a lack of professionalism in the curriculum system and training model. The “theorization” training model could not reflect the characteristics of the MPH degree itself and would not meet the requirements of social public health for professional degrees (2). The solution is recommended as follows: the prominent feature of MPH is that it is oriented toward professional practice and pays attention to the cultivation of students in public health practice. The curriculum system should be guided by the needs of the public health profession, and the core goal is to improve students’ core professional competence. The application of flipped classrooms combined with case-based learning has achieved remarkable results in students’ practical innovation abilities for some curriculums (3, 4).

The flipped classroom (FC) is a brand-new pedagogical approach that inverts teacher-centered and lecture-based traditional education into student-centered active learning education (5). In FC progress, students’ study pre-prepared course materials pre-class without the restrictions of time and place and participate in face-to-face interactive learning and problem solving in class, often with collaborative small group activities under the instructor’s guidance (6). FC leads to a shift from passive learning to active learning, facilitates higher-order learning of the materials, and promotes the development of various cardinal skills, thus overcoming the shortcomings of traditional LBC with desired results (7). A flipped classroom model also has the potential to influence students’ attitudes toward learning and motivation, given the autonomy provided within a course (8).

Case-based learning (CBL) is a special teaching methodology of problem-based learning (PBL) that focuses on learners and guides students to learn and explore through cases. Grauer et al. (9) noted that CBL methods require less time and are more efficient in providing large amounts of material compared to PBL. In CBL, the steps are: Prior reading →Problem → Seeking out extra information → Interview with a knowledge expert (10). Meanwhile, CBL is an in-class activity that can be applied within the FC model (11, 12) where medical students work in groups to deal with health-related questions.

Case-based learning based on flipped classroom can combine the advantages of the two (13), and with network technology (such as Yu Classroom, Mu Classroom, QQ, or Wechat Platform) as the carrier, we provide targeted guidance to students before, during, and after class to achieve the purpose of curriculum reform.

Introduction to Environmental Health Science is one of the required courses for the Master of Public Health (MPH). It is a new subject that has developed gradually in the process of human adaptation to the environment. Therefore, our research adopted the method of combining flipped classroom and case-based learning in the teaching of Introduction to Environmental Health Science for MPH to improve the theoretical level of environment and health of MPH students, their independent learning ability, and their innovative spirit and achieved a good teaching effect.

Methods

Participants

From September to December 2022, a cluster sampling method was used to select 22 MPH students from Guilin Medical University in the experimental group and 21 MPH students from 2021 in the control group. The teachers, the syllabus, and the total number of class hours (27 class hours, 1.5 credits) were identical between the experimental group and the control group. The numbers of male and female students in the experimental group and the control group were 6/15 and 11/11, respectively.

Study design

We used traditional multimedia courseware combined with blackboard teaching methods to explain theoretical knowledge [the teacher made teaching related content (PowerPoint, PPT), explained in the class according to the order of teaching, and taught important content or difficult to understand content combined with blackboard teaching methods] for the control group. The flipped classroom combined with the case-based learning method was adopted to carry out the teaching reform for the experimental group.

According to the requirements of the syllabus and the content of the MPH’s curriculum, we have selected the classic relevant cases. There were five parts, including environmental pollution, indoor air pollution, occupational poisoning or injury, food poisoning and transgenic food, and cases of social factors’ influence on health. We selected the classic cases for each part and sent them to the students through QQ or the Rain class platform before class. Students were divided into 3–4 people per group to analyze the case and report it in class after making a slide. After the report, teachers and students would analyze and explain the relevant contents together.

Observation indicators

Questionnaire survey

For the experimental group, we used the self-designed ‘Introduction to Environmental Health Science Questionnaire’ to conduct a survey. After the course, questionnaires were distributed through the questionnaire star, and questionnaires were filled out in anonymous form. A total of 22 questionnaires were sent out in this study, and 22 were effectively recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 100%.

Evaluation of academic performance

We evaluated the grade based on daily performance (30%) and paper results (70%). The difference was that the daily performance of the control group was mainly based on attendance and mainly determined by the daily reports and discussions of the experimental group. The daily reports referred to the teacher sending relevant topics and reference materials to students based on the course content before class, with 3–4 students/group reviewing and organizing the materials, making PPTs, and reporting in class. The final grade was 100, including analysis questions (75 points) and design questions (25 points).

Statistical analysis

SPSS28.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and the measurement data were expressed as (χ- ± s). The comparison between the two groups was conducted by two-independent sample T-test. The count data were represented by n (%), the test level α = 0.05, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of academic performance between the experimental group and the control group

Compared with the control group, the final exam score of the control group was higher than that of the experimental group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the paper score, and the design question score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of academic performance between the experimental group and control group (χ- ± s).

Evaluation of the teaching effect of students in the experimental group on introduction to environmental health science

The students in the experimental group had high overall satisfaction with the teaching effect of the flipped classroom combined case teaching method applied in Introduction to Environmental Health Science. Only one student was dissatisfied with the satisfaction of classroom interaction, while the others were satisfied, as shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Evaluation of students’ teaching effect on introduction to environmental health science n (%).

The learning effect of experimental group students on their self-perception of introduction to environmental health science

Fifteen students (68.18%) believed that this course was better than other courses, while seven students (31.82%) believed that it was like other courses, no one thought it was worse than other courses.

Favorite learning guidance methods for experimental group students

Among the preferred guidance methods for students, 12 liked face-to-face tutoring (54.54%), nine selected online answering questions (40.91%), and one person chose another (4.54%).

The focus of teaching reform in the introduction to environmental health science

Seven students (31.82%) each chose these two options. One was the teaching content shifting from basic theories to cutting-edge developments in the subject, and the other was traditional teaching methods shifting to modern teaching methods, as shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Key content of teaching reform for introduction to environmental health science.

Experimental group students’ understanding of blended learning

Twenty-two students (100%) believed that the blended learning model was beneficial for the learning of this course.

Discussion

Teaching characteristics and the current situation of introduction to environmental health science

MPH degree education is the main channel for cultivating high-level applied public health talents in China and has made significant contributions to promoting the construction of a public health talent team (14).

Introduction to Environmental Health Science, as one of the core and backbone courses of the MPH, mainly includes four modules: environment and health, occupational and health, food nutrition and health, and social behavior and health. Among them, the environment and health module mainly focuses on the relationship between the natural environment, living environment, and population health, revealing the occurrence and development patterns of environmental factors on population health and identifying, evaluating, utilizing, or controlling various environmental factors related to population health. The occupational and health module mainly focuses on the impact of working conditions on the health of occupational groups, exploring the improvement of working conditions, creating a safe, healthy, and comfortable working environment, and improving the health level of occupational groups. The food, nutrition, and health module mainly focuses on nutrients, natural active substances, dietary patterns and health, nutritional epidemiology, nutritional metabolomics, nutritional intervention strategies for different populations guided by theoretical models, microbial and chemical contamination in food, and risk assessment. Social behavior and health mainly take the health ecology model as the framework, understand the determinants of health and health promotion strategies, master the behavior ways of change of individuals, interpersonal relationships, organizations, communities, and other different levels, and apply this theory to the design, implementation, and evaluation of health promotion projects.

Because Introduction to Environmental Health Science is a compulsory course revised to adapt to the development of public health master’s education in the new situation, there are no ready-made textbooks to refer to, only corresponding teaching requirements and objectives. This requires us to continuously explore the teaching content and methods according to the requirements. Therefore, according to the characteristics of this course, we adopt the mode of the flipped classroom combined with case analysis for teaching.

The implementation effect of joint case-based learning in the flipped classroom

By using combined case-based learning with flipped classroom, there was no significant difference between the test group and the control group in terms of MPH test scores, and the final score was lower than the control group. The possible reason was that the assessment methods of the two grades’ daily scores were inconsistent. The experimental group’s daily performance was composed of attendance, and group reporting, and discussion (the composition of reported performance: students were grouped according to the case provided by the teacher for data review, PPT production, reporting, and display), while the control group only was evaluated their daily performance based on attendance, which was more practical and considers process evaluation. Therefore, the experimental group’s daily performance was lower than the control group’s. The score of design questions in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, which indicated that compared with the traditional teaching method, the combined case-based learning with flipped classroom had more comprehensive knowledge and enhanced students’ scientific thinking ability, which might be related to the improvement of students’ learning initiative through the combined case analysis method in flipped classroom, which had similar results with other studies. The case-based learning based on the flipped classroom was used for teaching different majors and different courses, such as ophthalmology and competitiveness-based UG curriculum (11, 15). We have achieved good results in improving students’ learning initiative, teaching satisfaction, and overall abilities.

Students’ satisfaction with the joint case-based learning in the flipped classroom

The total satisfaction of students with the teaching form, teaching content, and class hours, classroom atmosphere, academic burden, evaluation system, and learning guidance method, autonomous learning ability, learning enthusiasm, and participation in interaction adopted by the Introduction to Environmental Health Science exceeded 85%, which was consistent with Kolahdouzan et al.’s (16) teaching reform of surgery through the use of the case-based learning of the flipped classroom, and the improvement of students’ learning satisfaction. There were many teaching contents in Introduction to Environmental Health Science. If only flipped classroom or case-based learning was used for teaching, the class hours were not enough, so we combined case-based learning with flipped classroom. Before the start of the course, relevant case content would be posted to students through the established QQ platform. Students were required to group together before the class, analyze the case based on their knowledge, and form a PowerPoint presentation or discussion to form opinions from each group. Students would report in class, and the teacher would explain the knowledge points related to the case based on the students’ reports, and the students would discuss and summarize them. Sending students the latest cutting-edge developments related to course knowledge after class, allowing them to understand the latest developments, was beneficial for expanding their research thinking and knowledge, which was the difference between graduate teaching and undergraduate teaching. This was consistent with the summaries of other scholars (1, 17) on public health education.

The preferred guidance methods for students and the focus of teaching reform

The most popular guidance methods for students were face-to-face tutoring and online answering of questions, which indicated that students were satisfied with the mixed online and offline teaching methods and could accept new teaching modes. Students believed that the focus of teaching reform was mainly on the transformation of teaching content from basic theories to cutting-edge developments in the subject and changes in teaching methods. The introduction of cutting-edge knowledge in the discipline was mainly presented through case studies and sent to students through the QQ platform after class. This was in line with some scholars (18) who believed that using case-based learning in MPH professional teaching could build a bridge between campus and social public health needs. They hoped to develop and apply case-based learning to train students to use theory to solve practical problems and then move from practice to theory. The concept of promoting talents in the field of public health to better serve human health is consistent.

Therefore, in order to achieve the goal of MPH training, we have combined the flipped classroom and case-based learning to carry out the teaching reform of the Introduction to Environmental Health Science and achieved good results. The overall recognition of students was also high. Our result is similar to the following results. One is that using HyFlex learning for clinical learning in undergraduate clinical education during the COVID-19 era, the students had positive feedback about the HyFlex simulation learning method in acquiring knowledge and improving objective achievement (19). The other is that the integration of scenario-based simulations in radiology education led to a positive impact on learning outcomes, formative interactive learning, and filling the gap between theory and practice (20).

In future teaching, we hope to gradually improve the relevant teaching cases, improve students’ practical ability and innovative scientific research thinking, and make due contributions to the construction of a healthy China (21).

Future prospectives and limitations

Further teaching reforms are needed in future for MPH graduate students to continuously observe the effectiveness of the reforms. The corresponding case library can be used online for everyone to learn together, which will have a better effect.

Our study had certain shortcomings that needed to be investigated further and addressed in future research. Firstly, the control group did not conduct a questionnaire survey on students. Secondly, there are fewer MPH students studying the course each semester, and it is necessary to conduct the teaching reform of the course among the MPH students recruited each year in the future.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft. LC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WP: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YS: Methodology, Project administration, Software, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Guangxi Degree and Postgraduate Education Reform Project (Grant no. JGY2021128), and Guangxi Science and Technology Major Special Project (Grant no. GKAA22096026).

Acknowledgments

We thank all authors, editors, and reviewers for their outstanding contributions and insightful comments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Jin, H, Dong, G, Zou, L, Shen, X, and Li, D. History and status quo of higher public health education in China. Public Health Rev. (2020) 41:12. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00120-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ren, T, Wang, XW, Song, J, Qin, XY, Zhu, YP, Wu, YQ, et al. Investigation on the current status of the cultivation of the master of public health (MPH) in colleges in China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2019) 53:419–20. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yang, F, Lin, W, and Wang, Y. Flipped classroom combined with case-based learning is an effective teaching modality in nephrology clerkship. BMC Med Educ. (2021) 21:276. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02723-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hu, XM, Li, ZX, Deng, J, Han, Y, Lu, S, Zhang, Q, et al. Integration of theory and practice in medical morphology curriculum in postgraduate training: a flipped classroom and case-based learning exercise. Curr Med Sci. (2023) 43:741–8. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2759-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hew, KF, and Lo, CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. (2018) 18:38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Persky, AM, and McLaughlin, JE. The flipped classroom—from theory to practice in health professional education. Am J Pharm Educ. (2017) 81:118. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Angadi, NB, Kavi, A, Shetty, K, and Hashilkar, NK. Effectiveness of flipped classroom as a teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students - an interventional study. J Educ Health Promot. (2019) 8:211. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_163_19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Peng, W, Xiong, Y, Wei, J, Chen, X, Huai, W, He, S, et al. Flipped classroom improves student learning outcome in Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:936899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.936899

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Grauer, GF, Forrester, SD, Shuman, C, and Sanderson, MW. Comparison of student performance after lecture-based and case-based/problem-based teaching in a large group. J Vet Med Educ. (2008) 35:310–7. doi: 10.3138/jvme.35.2.310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chéron, M, Ademi, M, Kraft, F, and Löffler-Stastka, H. Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students. BMC Med Educ. (2016) 16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0564-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Diel, RJ, Yom, KH, Ramirez, D, Alawa, K, Cheng, J, Dawoud, S, et al. Flipped ophthalmology classroom augmented with case-based learning. Digit J Ophthalmol. (2021) 27:1–5. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2021.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Farina, C, Hranchook, AM, Bittinger, AC, and Aebersold, M. The flipped classroom with case-based learning in graduate nurse anesthesia education. AANA J. (2021) 89:254–60.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Cai, L, Li, YL, Hu, XY, and Li, R. Implementation of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning: a promising and effective teaching modality in undergraduate pathology education. Medicine (Baltimore). (2022) 101:e28782. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wu, YY, Yang, L, Chen, L, Xiao, F, Tan, HZ, and Hu, GQ. Comparison of training models for master of public health between China and other countries. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. (2021) 42:2208–13. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200830-01108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kumar, T, Sakshi, P, and Kumar, C. Comparative study between “case-based learning” and “flipped classroom” for teaching clinical and applied aspects of physiology in "competency-based UG curriculum". J Family Med Prim Care. (2022) 11:6334–8. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_172_22

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kolahdouzan, M, Mahmoudieh, M, Rasti, M, Omid, A, Rostami, A, and Yamani, N. The effect of case-based teaching and flipped classroom methods in comparison with lecture method on learning and satisfaction of internship students in surgery. J Educ Health Promot. (2020) 9:256. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_237_19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chen, J, and Zhang, Z. Editorial: public health promotion and medical education reform. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:918962. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.918962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sibbald, SL, Speechley, M, and Thind, A. Adapting to the needs of the public health workforce: an integrated case-based training program. Front Public Health. (2016) 4:221. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Abuzaid, MM, Elshami, W, Issa, B, and Taha, MH. Effectiveness of HyFlex simulation-based clinical learning in comparison to traditional learning in undergraduate clinical education. In HMK Al Naimiy, M Bettayeb, HM Elmehdi, and I Shehadi. (editors). Future Trends in Education Post COVID-19 (SHJEDU). Singapore: Springer, (2023):191–203.

Google Scholar

20. Abuzaid, M, and Elshami, W. Integrating of scenario-based simulation into radiology education to improve critical thinking skills. Report Medical Imaging. (2016) 9:17–22. doi: 10.2147/rmi.s110343

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chen, P, Li, F, and Harmer, P. Healthy China 2030: moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. Lancet Public Health. (2019) 4:e447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30160-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: flipped classroom, case-based learning, Introduction to Environmental Health Science, Master of Public Health, traditional teaching method

Citation: Li Y, Cao L, Zhang H, Pang W, Sun Y and Zhang Z (2023) Application of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning in Introduction to Environmental Health Science. Front. Public Health. 11:1264843. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264843

Received: 21 July 2023; Accepted: 28 August 2023;
Published: 15 September 2023.

Edited by:

Jouhanna Menegaz, Santa Catarina State University, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Allison Mari Dering-Anderson, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States
Mohamed M. Abuzaid, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

Copyright © 2023 Li, Cao, Zhang, Pang, Sun and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhiyong Zhang, rpazz@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.