Fatima Mougharbel1,2
Jean-Philippe Chaput2,3
Hugues Sampasa-Kanyinga2
Hayley A. Hamilton4Ian Colman3,5Scott T. Leatherdale6
Gary S. Goldfield2,3*- 1School of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- 2Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- 3School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- 4Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 5Center for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- 6School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Background: Despite increasing evidence that social media use is associated with adolescents’ mental well-being, little is known about the role of various factors in modifying the effect of this association during adolescence. This study examined the association between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents and explored whether sex, age, and parental support moderate this association.
Methods: Data came from a representative sample of middle and high school students in Ontario, Canada. Cross-sectional analyses included 6,822 students derived from the 2019 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey.
Results: Our results showed that 48% of adolescents used social media for 3 h or more per day, and 43.7% had moderate to severe psychological distress, with a higher prevalence among females (54%) than males (31%). After adjustment for relevant covariates, heavy social media use (≥3 h/day) was associated with increased odds of severe psychological distress [odds ratio (OR): 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.59–2.55]. The association of social media use with psychological distress was modified by age (p < 0.05) but not sex or parental support. The association was stronger among younger adolescents.
Conclusion: Heavy social media use is associated with higher levels of psychological distress, with younger adolescents being the most vulnerable. Longitudinal studies are recommended for future research to examine in more depth the role of sex, age, and parental support in the association between social media use and psychological distress to better determine the strength and of the association.
Background
Adolescence is a critical and formative transitory period in which individuals shift from childhood to adulthood. With significant biological, developmental, and psychological changes taking place during adolescence, it is crucial to ensure that adolescents are fully supported to promote physical and mental well-being to set the stage for a healthy adulthood (1, 2). During this period of life, adolescents become more independent in making choices related to their lifestyle behaviors (3). Early adolescence involves pubertal changes that elicit substantial biological, cognitive, physical, social, and emotional changes making this a critical period for the development of mental health problems (4, 5). Furthermore, the period of late adolescence through which adolescents are transitioning to adulthood, is also considered to be a highly vulnerable period for mental health problems that can have profound effects into adulthood (6). Accordingly, it is crucial to examine how modifiable behaviors during adolescence impact mental health outcomes, in order to address them before they become rooted.
Mental health problems among adolescents have increased worldwide, with one in seven (14%) young people aged 10–19 years experiencing mental health problems (1), within which anxiety and depression make up about 43% (2) and are considered the leading causes of illness and disability for adolescents (1). Depression and anxiety are also considered risk factors for many adverse health outcomes, such as cardiovascular diseases, behavioral problems, and substance use disorder (7, 8). In addition to that, depression and anxiety can affect academic achievement and learning, and reduce quality of life. At its worst, depression can lead to suicide (1). Recent evidence suggests that girls have worse mental health outcomes such as psychological distress than boys (9–11). With mental health morbidity increasing significantly among adolescents (12), underpinning factors are still unclear, but are likely complex and influenced by many environmental factors. Previous literature has suggested that increases in mental health problems may be associated with higher levels of social media use (13–16).
While the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the trend of social media use among adolescents when in-person interaction had been restricted (17–19), social media use had increased dramatically among adolescents and occupied a significant part of their daily lives even prior to the onset of the pandemic (20). Recently, the World Health Organization strongly recommended in their 2020 guidelines for physical activity and sedentary behavior that children and youth should limit the amount of recreational screen time (21). Furthermore, the Canadian 24-h movement guidelines for children and adolescents recommend limiting recreational screen time to 2 h or less for children and youth aged 5–17 years (22, 23). However, with the emergence of newer devices such as tablets and smartphones, social media was considered as one of the most used screen activities among youth, especially females (24, 25). In Canada, 86% of youth in Ontario use social media platforms every day, and more than 20% indicate they spend more than 5 h on social media daily (26). This raises concerns given that adolescence, especially at its onset, is considered a crucial time frame because it is the period at which there is an exponential increase in social media use (27) and increasing vulnerability to mental health problems (4). Accordingly, understanding the association between social media use and adolescents’ mental health has become a priority.
Previous studies on social media use and adolescents’ mental health provides some evidence regarding the nature of the association (13, 14, 16, 24, 28–31). However, results were mixed, resulting in an inconclusive understanding to date. Inconsistent findings could be attributed to many reasons, such as differences in research designs, populations sampled, and analytical plans. Also, while various factors of social media use and mental health have been identified in previous research, most studies failed to examine whether this association differs by characteristics of individuals (16, 24, 32–34). For example, some studies reported sex differences in the association between social media use and mental health or performed stratified analyses by sex without statistically examining whether sex moderated the association (35–39), and in the few that considered the moderating role of sex on the relationship (13, 40, 41), results were inconsistent. Age has also been proposed as a factor that could modify the effect of social media use on mental health problems, yet, only one study examined the moderating role of age, and found that high social media use was associated with higher odds of internalizing problems among younger adolescents (42). Given the importance of the social media context during early adolescence, a period in which individuals give more values to peer acceptance, friendships, and identity exploration, early adolescents can be more vulnerable to harmful contents of social media (43, 44). In addition, recent research showed that females who use social media extensively at early ages had poorer mental health outcomes several years on (41). This suggests further examination of the role of age and sex in the association between social media use and mental health among adolescents (15, 16, 24).
In addition to the role of sex and age, research needs to better understand other factors such as the social and psychological support factors represented by the role of parents (24, 45). It has been suggested that weak parental supportiveness makes adolescents feel disconnected, so they use social media more frequently to find meaningful social interaction (45). However, very little is known about how parental support plays a role in social media use and adolescent depression and anxiety, and none of the studies examined the moderating role of parental support. Thus, considering the role of parents in this association is important and needed (24).
Since social media use is both highly prevalent among youth and a seemingly modifiable behavior, examining the variables that modify the effect of the association between social media use and psychological distress symptoms among youth is crucial to fill the knowledge gaps and inform future research and interventions. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to (1) examine the association between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents, and (2) explore the moderating role of age, sex, and parental support on the association between social media use and psychological distress. We hypothesized that heavy social media use would be associated with psychological distress in adolescents. We also hypothesized that sex, age, and parental support would be moderators of this association with females, younger adolescents, and those who reported rare parental support being the most vulnerable for psychological distress when using social media heavily.
Design
The current study is a secondary data analysis of the 2019 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey (OSDUHS) (46). This representative cross-sectional school-based survey included Ontarians in grades 7–12 from English and French public and Catholic schools (n = 14,142). Two hundred sixty-three schools from 47 public and Catholic school boards participated in this survey. Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Boards of the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH; 029/2016), York University (e2014-099), and 47 public and Catholic school boards’ research review committees. Participation in the survey required active parental written consent and student assent. The survey was completed anonymously during school time.
Data were collected from November 2018 to June 2019. Four split ballot versions of the questionnaire were administered in classrooms in a paper booklet format (Form A and B for Elementary Schools; Form A and B for Secondary Schools) where students completed one of two alternately distributed questionnaires in classrooms depending on the school level. Questionnaires used in elementary schools excluded certain topics (e.g., drug use screeners for problematic drug use). Form A and Form B were distributed alternatively to students in each classroom to accomplish two near-equal random samples completing each form. The overall completion rate was 59%, with reasons for not completing the survey including unreturned consents or refusal of participation (29%), and student absenteeism (12%). Further information about the survey is available elsewhere (46). For the present study, only those who completed the questionnaire with the mental health component (Form A, N = 7,617) were included.
Measures
Social media use
Students were asked to indicate how many hours they spend daily posting or browsing social media sites, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Response options were as follows: less than 1 h a day, about 1 h a day, 2 h a day, 3–4 h a day, 5–6 h a day, 7 or more hours a day, not daily usage, do not use social media, and do not use the Internet. We created a scale variable as follows: the three latter response options represented no use of social media (coded 0), the “less than 1 h a day,” “about 1 h a day,” and “2 h a day” responses were collapsed and represented light to moderate use (coded 1), the “3–4 h a day,” “5–6 h a day,” and “seven or more hours a day” were collapsed and represented heavy use (coded 2). The cut-off was specified based on the recommended cut-off of 2 h or less for daily recreational screen time among adolescents from the Canadian sedentary behavior guidelines (22) and previous studies on similar topics (47, 48).
Psychological distress
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6) was used to measure the frequency of experiencing depression and anxiety in the past 4 weeks (49). Each of the six items included the following response options: “none of the time,” “a little of the time,” “some of the time,” “most of the time,” and “all of the time.” A total score ranging from 0 to 24 was created, with higher scores representing greater psychological distress. A score ranging from 0 to 7 represented no distress (coded 0), 8 to 12 represented moderate distress (coded 1), and a score of 13 and more indicated severe distress (coded 2) (50), consistent with other studies using the K6 measure (51–53). The K6 is a valid and reliable tool to measure symptoms of psychological distress among youth with a high internal consistency (α = 0.86) (54). The internal reliability coefficient for the K-6 in this study was Cronbach’s α = 0.87.
Potential moderators
Sex, age, and parental support were potential moderators in our study. Sex is represented by a binary variable: females (coded 1) and males (coded 0). Age was also represented by a binary variable and grouped as “younger adolescents” (10–14 years old, coded 0) and “older adolescents” (15–20 years old, coded 1) based on early adolescence and middle and late adolescence phases reported in the literature (55). Parental support was assessed by the following question: “How often do you talk about your problems and feelings with at least one of your parents?” The response options were: “always,” “usually,” “sometimes,” “rarely,” and “never.” We collapsed the first two categories into one category that represented good parental support (coded = 0). Responses of “sometimes” (coded = 1) remained a separate category, and the last two categories were collapsed to represent poor parental support (coded = 2).
Covariates
Covariates included sex and age (if not moderators), ethnicity, subjective socioeconomic status (SES), and body mass index (BMI) z-score. Covariates were selected based on their availability in the dataset and their association with the independent and dependent variables (56–60). Ethnicity was measured through self-identification from the following categories: White, Chinese, Filipino, South East Asian, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, West Asian, Black, Aboriginal, Latino, and Other. We dichotomized this variable as follows: White (coded 0) in a separate category, and all multiple selections on the ethnicity groups included in another category (coded 1). SES was assessed using the MacArthur Subjective Socioeconomic Status Ladder (61). Students were asked to indicate on the 1–10 rungs ladder what best described their parents’ SES: “Imagine this ladder below shows how Canadian society is set up. At the top of the ladder are people who are the ‘best off’—they have the most money, the most education, and the jobs that bring the most respect. At the bottom are the people who are ‘worst off’—they have the least money, little education, no job or jobs that no one wants. Now think about your family. Please check off the numbered box that best shows where you think your family would be on this ladder.” Rungs higher on the ladder indicate higher perceived SES. This variable was treated as a continuous variable in our analyses. We also calculated BMI (km/m2) from students’ self-reported weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters), and we transformed it into z-scores following the reference data issued by the World Health Organization (62).
Statistical analysis
In our analysis, we used Taylor series linearization methods to account for the complexity of the sample design of the survey and to attain unbiased variances and point estimates using Stata 16.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, United States). Analyses included complete information on all variables, reducing the sample size from 7,617 to 6,822. Pearson’s chi-square tests and adjusted Wald tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively, to test the statistical differences between excluded data (missing data) and those included in our analyses for all the variables. Compared to the included participants, those who were excluded were more likely to be males, aged 15–20 years, less likely to be of white ethnicity, and more likely to use social media heavily.
Participant characteristics were described by proportions and means. Correlations between all variables of interest included in the study were examined using Spearman correlation for ordinal and continuous variables and Pearson chi-square adjusted for the survey design and transformed into an F-statistic for categorical variables because of the complex sampling. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for the psychological distress outcome with all independent variables of interest. Furthermore, crude and adjusted ordered regression models were used to examine associations between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents. Covariates included age, sex, ethnicity, subjective SES, and BMI z-score. In order to test if the associations between social media and psychological distress varied by sex, age, and parental support, two-way interactions were examined in separate models. In cases where interaction terms were significant, stratified results were presented.
Results
Sample characteristics
Table 1 provides the descriptive characteristics of the sample. About 57% of the sample were females, 58% of the students were 15 years or older, and 56% were white. About 48% of the sample used social media heavily (≥3 h daily). The prevalence of moderate and severe psychological distress was 23.4 and 20.3%, respectively.
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the full sample and stratified by variables of interest.
Among the younger students (11–14 years), 38.7% used social media heavily, 32.6% reported rare parental support, 19.8% were moderately distressed, and 16% were severely distressed. However, among older students, 54.6% reported using social media heavily, 37.2% reported rare parental support, 26% were moderately distressed, and 23.6% were severely distressed.
Regarding parental support, among those who reported having usual parental support (N = 2,745), 14% reported not using social media, 43.6% reported using social media moderately, and 42.4% reported heavy use of social media. Also, among the same group, 20.1% reported having moderate distress, and 11.8% reported having severe distress.
However, among those who reported having rare parental support (N = 2,410), 11.5% reported not using social media, 34.5% reported using social media moderately, and 54% reported heavy use of social media. In addition to that, of participants who reported having rare parental support, 24.7% reported having moderate distress, and 31.3% reported having severe distress.
Bivariate analysis
Bivariate correlations for all variables of interest are shown in Table 2. The chi-square results indicate that being a male was correlated with lower psychological distress and less social media use. Being older (15–20-year-old) was correlated with higher psychological distress and more social media use. Non-white ethnicity was associated with higher psychological distress. Spearman correlation results indicate that higher SES was associated with lower psychological distress. Also, higher psychological distress was associated with more use of social media and less parental support. Furthermore, less parental support was associated with more social media use.
Table 2. Correlation results of the association between psychological distress, sociodemographic characteristics, and social media use among adolescents (n = 6,822).
Multivariable ordinal regression modeling of the association between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents adjusted for all variables of interest
Results of multivariable ordinal regression analysis examining the association between social media use and psychological distress are summarized in Table 3. Heavy social media use was associated with psychological distress (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.12–1.85). Also, adolescents who reported parental support was rare had higher odds of psychological distress compared to those with good parental support (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 2.04–2.84). Adolescents who felt sometimes supported also had higher odds of psychological distress compared to those with good parental support (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.31–1.87). Males were less likely than females to experience high psychological distress levels (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.36–0.46).
Table 3. Results of the ordered regression analysis of the association between social media use and psychological distress adjusted for all variables of interest (n = 6,822).
Crude and adjusted multivariable ordinal regression modeling with interaction terms of the association of social media use on psychological distress among adolescents
Results of multivariable ordinal regression analysis examining the association between social media use and psychological distress with interaction terms are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. Results of the crude and adjusted ordered regression analysis with interaction terms of the associations between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents (n = 6,822).
Interactions were statistically significant for age by heavy social media use for distress [Model 3—two-way interaction terms (OR: 0.54; CI: 0.33–0.90, p < 0.05)]. Interaction terms for sex (Model 2) and parental support (Model 4) by social media were not significant.
Our unadjusted models show that the interaction terms for parental support by heavy social media for psychological distress are significant for those who reported having parental support sometimes and those who reported rare parental support (OR: 0.51; CI: 0.27–0.94, p < 0.05 and OR: 0.53; CI: 0.31–0.91, p < 0.05, respectively). However, the moderating role of parental support became insignificant after adjusting for covariates. Thus, subsequent analyses examining the association between social media use and psychological distress were stratified by age.
Crude and adjusted multivariable ordinal regression modeling of social media use on psychological distress among adolescents stratified by age
Results of the multivariable ordinal regression analysis examining the association between social media use stratified by age are presented in Table 5. After adjusting for covariates, younger students who use social media heavily had higher odds of psychological distress (OR = 2.32; CI: 1.67–3.21).
Table 5. Results of the crude and adjusted ordered regression analysis of the associations between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents, stratified by age (n = 6,822).
Discussion
This study examined the association between social media use and psychological distress in a large and representative sample of adolescents in Ontario (Canada) and explored whether sex, age, and parental support would moderate this relationship. Heavy use of social media was moderately associated with higher levels of psychological distress among adolescents, and the effect of the association was modified by age, but not sex or parental support.
Even though the cross-sectional design of this study cannot determine the direction of the associations, our findings regarding the positive correlation between time spent on social media and high levels of psychological distress align with previous cross-sectional (42, 63–67), experimental and prospective studies (68–71), and reviews (24, 34, 73, 74), which provided implicit causation regarding the direction of the association that moves from heavy social media use to mental health problems. Numerous mechanisms could contribute to the direction and nature of the relationship between social media use and depression and anxiety. Adolescents involved in high levels of social media may experience poor quality of sleep, which plays a mediating role in the pathway to depression and anxiety (75, 76). Furthermore, time spent on social media may increase the risk of exposure to unrealistic societal ideal images and an over representation of positive experiences and posts (77, 78). Thus, adolescents who make frequent unfavorable social comparisons with other users are more likely to experience negative feelings about body image and encounter envy, guilt, and regret (66, 79). These feelings can be detrimental to their self-esteem and have been identified as significant contributors to internalizing problems such as depression and anxiety (25, 79–83). Also, more time spent on social media increases the chances of experiencing cyberbullying, which has strong ties with depressive symptoms (47, 84). In addition, the displacement theory posits the lack of social and in-person interaction and family communication displaced by frequent time on social media can contribute to symptoms of depression and anxiety (85). These associations between social media and mental distress should be explored prospectively to help determine the temporality of the associations identified.
This study also found that younger adolescents have higher odds of distress when using social media heavily than their older counterparts (42). Our results could be explained by early adolescence, as a vulnerable stage for mental health issues (4, 5, 86, 87) in which social media was indicated as a potential risk factor (88, 89). This phase involves significant pubertal changes, and biological, neurological, and social transformation (5, 90, 91), in which adolescents start to experience an increase in self-consciousness, inner conflict, stress, and disorientation (91). At the social and contextual level, peer relationships become more central to self-worth, and family can become disoriented as youths strive for independence, and this may spark greater reliance on social media as a source of social support, autonomy, seeking peers’ feedback, and exploring identity (43, 92–94). As such, early adolescence is distinguished by a significant increase in internalizing and externalizing problems (4, 5, 86, 87). Young adolescents’ brain regions that are engaged in social interaction endure extensive changes, which make them vulnerable to being impacted by media use that contributes to low self-esteem, upward social comparison, emotion-loaded communications (25, 92), and cyberbullying which can all trigger mental health symptoms (37, 95–97). In addition to that, heavy use of social media can interfere with the time adolescents use to do other beneficial activities like in-person interaction or physical activity which can increase their chance to experience mental health issues (14, 98).
While males were less likely than females to experience psychological distress, and tend to use social media less heavily, no moderating role of sex was found in the extent to which social media use subgroups are associated with psychological distress, aligning with previous work (40). These results may be attributed to the way social media use was measured, which only focused on the social media use time and could not represent how social media was used. However, our study showed that females spent more time on social media and reported greater psychological distress symptoms than males, results in line with previous studies (4, 10, 40, 42, 88, 99–101). We hypothesized that females would be more negatively affected psychologically by greater social media use because they are more emotionally and interested in friendships, and body appearance (102, 103), and tend to be more involved in self-disclosure (102), and are more likely than males to experience low emotional self-efficacy and lack of negative emotional management (104, 105). This might make females more vulnerable to experience social media-related upward social comparison (106), cyberbullying (36, 47), and body dissatisfaction (89), all factors known to be linked with depression and anxiety.
The finding that adjustment for SES and sex reduced the moderating effect of parental support to nonsignificance suggests that parental support’s role in the association between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents is impacted by sex and SES. This supports the need for future longitudinal studies to evaluate further these factors and other unexamined factors that may underlie the moderating effects of parental support in the social media–mental health relationship. In further consideration of our findings, the simplicity of the parental support variable, which only measured to what extent adolescents discuss their problems with parents, could be one reason why parental support did not moderate the association after adjustment for such a finding. Research has indicated that the role of parents is indeed very important and includes multiple levels of involvement, in addition to having their children discuss their problems with them (24, 45). Parents can be both gatekeepers (107) and influencers of their adolescents’ social media use experience especially during early adolescence (108–110).
On the other hand, our results showed that those with rare parental support used social media more frequently and had higher odds for psychological distress, consistent with previous work. It has been known that parents play a significant role in their adolescents’ social media use and behavior, which can impact mental well-being (111–114). Adolescents who reported having unsupportive parents felt disconnected, and used social media more frequently to find meaningful social interaction (45). That being said, in-person communication and support offline from parents are all factors that can shape adolescents’ media use and experience, which in turn impact mental well-being. Therefore, we highly recommend that future research investigate through large longitudinal studies the role of parental support, taking into consideration the impact of other important covariates in this association.
This study has several limitations worth mentioning. Our findings are based on cross-sectional data; thus, the bidirectional relationship between social media use and psychological distress could not be determined. Therefore, it is still unclear whether social media experiences shape mental health problems or vice versa. For example, those in distress may seek comfort, support or satisfy other psychological needs through social media (115). Also, data measured only the time spent on social media and not the quality of the time, which is a critical factor (29, 37). In addition, self-reported instruments are subject to inaccuracies and residual confounding by unmeasured variables is always possible in observational studies (e.g., medication use and history of mental health problems). Finally, as in all large studies, missing values are inevitable, and we had 10%. Case analyses showed that those with missing data were more likely to be males, to use social media more heavily and were more distressed, so it is uncertain how these missing cases would have impacted the observed associations had they been included in the analysis.
The results of our study may offer valuable implications for tailored preventative interventions to help minimize heavy and unhealthy social media use. As our results indicated, younger adolescents are more likely to experience psychological distress when using social media heavily; as such, it is important to educate parents and caregivers to help their young children and adolescentsto decrease their time on social media and promote appropriate behavioral regulation. Also, discussions with adolescents about their social media behavior, the risks and benefits of platforms, and promoting safe and effective social media strategies are warranted (116, 117). Furthermore, longitudinal studies that capture specific types, quality, and context of social media use are highly recommended to better understand the strength and the directional impact of the relationship between social media and mental health.
Conclusion
Our results show that heavy social media use is moderately associated with psychological distress among adolescents, and this association is modified by age, with younger adolescents being more vulnerable. As such, future studies would benefit from longitudinal designs with larger, more representative samples that examine the bidirectional association and investigate in more depth the role of sex, age, and parental support. Furthermore, future studies that investigate the mechanisms of this association taking into consideration the quality and quantity of social media use, are warranted. Addressing these points will help to design media literacy programs, policies, and approaches for parents, mental health providers, teachers, and adolescents to promote mental health and educate adolescents, especially younger ones, on the negative psychological impacts of heavy social media consumption.
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: the datasets presented in this research article cannot be made available in the manuscript, supplementary material, or a public repository due to the Center for Addiction and Mental Health’s and The Ontario Public and Catholic School Board’s institutional Research Ethics Board agreements. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the Center for Addiction and Mental Health at aW5mb0BjYW1oLmNh.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Boards of the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), York University, and 47 public and Catholic school boards’ research review committees. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Author contributions
FM, J-PC, and GG participated in the conception of the study. FM and HS-K conducted statistical analyses. FM wrote the first version of the manuscript. J-PC and GG substantially contributed to the methods and interpretation of results. J-PC, GG, HS-K, IC, SL, and HH critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey, a Center for Addiction and Mental Health initiative, was funded in part through ongoing support from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, as well as targeted funding from several provincial agencies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the school boards, schools, and students who participated in the OSDUHS study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. WHO Adolescent mental health. (2019). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health (Accessed November 20, 2019).
2. UNICEF. On My Mind: Promoting, Protecting and Caring for Children’s Mental Health. New York, NY: UNICEF (2021).
3. Spear, HJ, and Kulbok, P. Autonomy and adolescence: a concept analysis. Public Health Nurs Boston Mass. (2004) 21:144–52. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021208.x
4. McLaughlin, KA, and King, K. Developmental trajectories of anxiety and depression in early adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2015) 43:311–23. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9898-1
5. Tottenham, N, and Galván, A. Stress and the adolescent brain: amygdala-prefrontal cortex circuitry and ventral striatum as developmental targets. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2016) 70:217–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.030
6. Kessler, RC, Berglund, P, Demler, O, Jin, R, Merikangas, KR, and Walters, EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2005) 62:593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
7. Scott, KM. Depression, anxiety and incident cardiometabolic diseases. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2014) 27:289–93. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000067
8. Wolitzky-Taylor, K, Bobova, L, Zinbarg, RE, Mineka, S, and Craske, MG. Longitudinal investigation of the impact of anxiety and mood disorders in adolescence on subsequent substance use disorder onset and vice versa. Addict Behav. (2012) 37:982–5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.026
9. Campbell, OLK, Bann, D, and Patalay, P. The gender gap in adolescent mental health: a cross-national investigation of 566,829 adolescents across 73 countries. SSM Popul Health. (2021) 13:100742. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100742
10. Albert, PR. Why is depression more prevalent in women? J Psychiatry Neurosci. (2015) 40:219–21. doi: 10.1503/jpn.150205
11. Van Droogenbroeck, F, Spruyt, B, and Keppens, G. Gender differences in mental health problems among adolescents and the role of social support: results from the Belgian health interview surveys 2008 and 2013. BMC Psychiatry. (2018) 18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1591-4
12. Twenge, JM, Cooper, AB, Joiner, TE, Duffy, ME, and Binau, SG. Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005-2017. J Abnorm Psychol. (2019) 128:185–99. doi: 10.1037/abn0000410
13. Riehm, KE, Feder, KA, Tormohlen, KN, Crum, RM, Young, AS, Green, KM, et al. Associations between time spent using social media and internalizing and externalizing problems among US youth. JAMA Psychiat. (2019) 76:1266–73. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2325
14. Twenge, JM, Martin, GN, and Campbell, WK. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emot Wash DC. (2018) 18:765–80. doi: 10.1037/emo0000403
15. Ivie, EJ, Pettitt, A, Moses, LJ, and Allen, NB. A meta-analysis of the association between adolescent social media use and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2020) 275:165–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.014
16. Keles, B, McCrae, N, and Grealish, A. A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. Int J Adolesc Youth. (2020) 25:79–93. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851
17. Nilsson, A, Rosendahl, I, and Jayaram-Lindström, N. Gaming and social media use among adolescents in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. (2022) 39:347–61. doi: 10.1177/14550725221074997
18. Zhang, S, Liu, M, Li, Y, and Chung, JE. Teens’ social media engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time series examination of posting and emotion on Reddit. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:10079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910079
19. Wiederhold, BK. Social media use during social distancing. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2020) 23:275–6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.29181.bkw
20. Rideout, V, and Robb, M. Social Media, Social Life: Teens Reveal Their Experiences. San Francisco, CA, US: Common Sense Media (2018).
21. World Health Organization WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior. (2020) Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336656/9789240015128-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed December 3, 2020).
22. Tremblay, MS, Carson, V, Chaput, J-P, Connor Gorber, S, Dinh, T, Duggan, M, et al. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiol. (2016) 41:S311–27. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0151
23. Tremblay, MS, LeBlanc, AG, Carson, V, Choquette, L, Connor Gorber, S, Dillman, C, et al. Canadian physical activity guidelines for the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2012) 37:345–56. doi: 10.1139/h2012-018
24. Vidal, C, Lhaksampa, T, Miller, L, and Platt, R. Social media use and depression in adolescents: a scoping review. Int Rev Psychiatry Abingdon Engl. (2020) 32:235–53. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1720623
25. Nesi, J, and Prinstein, MJ. Using social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: gender and popularity moderate associations with depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2015) 43:1427–38. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0
26. Boak, A, Hamilton, HA, Adlaf, EM, Beitchman, J, Wolfe, D, and Mann, RE. The mental health and well-being of Ontario students, 1991–2017: Detailed findings from the Ontario student drug use and health survey (OSDUHS). (2018)
28. Thorisdottir, IE, Sigurvinsdottir, R, Kristjansson, AL, Allegrante, JP, Lilly, CL, and Sigfusdottir, ID. Longitudinal association between social media use and psychological distress among adolescents. Prev Med. (2020) 141:106270. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106270
29. Thorisdottir, IE, Sigurvinsdottir, R, Asgeirsdottir, BB, Allegrante, JP, and Sigfusdottir, ID. Active and passive social media use and symptoms of anxiety and depressed mood among Icelandic adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2019) 22:535–42. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0079
30. Heffer, T, Good, M, Daly, O, MacDonell, E, and Willoughby, T. The longitudinal association between social-media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and Young adults: an empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clin Psychol Sci. (2019) 7:462–70. doi: 10.1177/2167702618812727
31. Jensen, M, George, MJ, Russell, MR, and Odgers, CL. Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clin Psychol Sci. (2019) 7:1416–33. doi: 10.1177/2167702619859336
32. McCrae, N, Gettings, S, and Purssell, E. Social media and depressive symptoms in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Adolesc Res Rev. (2017) 2:315–30. doi: 10.1007/s40894-017-0053-4
33. Seabrook, EM, Kern, ML, and Rickard, NS. Social networking sites, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. (2016) 3:e5842. doi: 10.2196/mental.5842
34. Huang, C. Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. CyberPsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2017) 20:346–54. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0758
35. Boers, E, Afzali, MH, and Conrod, P. Temporal associations of screen time and anxiety symptoms among adolescents. Can J Psychiatr. (2020) 65:206–8. doi: 10.1177/0706743719885486
36. Kim, S, Kimber, M, Boyle, MH, and Georgiades, K. Sex differences in the association between cyberbullying victimization and mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. Can J Psychiatr Rev Can Psychiatr. (2019) 64:126–35. doi: 10.1177/0706743718777397
37. Frison, E, and Eggermont, S. Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Soc Sci Comput Rev. (2015) 34:153–71. doi: 10.1177/0894439314567449
38. Banjanin, N, Banjanin, N, Dimitrijevic, I, and Pantic, I. Relationship between internet use and depression: focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Comput Hum Behav. (2015) 43:308–12. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013
39. Barry, C, Sidoti, C, Briggs, S, Reiter, S, and Lindsey, R. Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent perspectives. J Adolesc. (2017) 61:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.005
40. Kelly, Y, Zilanawala, A, Booker, C, and Sacker, A. Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK millennium cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. (2018) 6:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005
41. Booker, CL, Kelly, YJ, and Sacker, A. Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10-15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18:321. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5220-4
42. Tsitsika, AK, Tzavela, EC, Janikian, M, Ólafsson, K, Iordache, A, Schoenmakers, TM, et al. Online social networking in adolescence: patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. (2014) 55:141–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.010
43. Gerwin, RL, Kaliebe, K, and Daigle, M. The interplay between digital media use and development. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. (2018) 27:345–55. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2017.11.002
44. Nesi, J, Miller, AB, and Prinstein, MJ. Adolescents’ depressive symptoms and subsequent technology-based interpersonal behaviors: a multi-wave study. J Appl Dev Psychol. (2017) 51:12–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.02.002
45. Hwang, J, and Toma, CL. The role of mental well-being and perceived parental supportiveness in adolescents’ problematic internet use: moderation analysis. JMIR Ment Health. (2021) 8:e26203. doi: 10.2196/26203
46. Boak, A, Hamilton, HA, Adlaf, EM, and Mann, RE. Drug use among Ontario students, 1977–2019: Detailed findings from the Ontario student drug use and health survey. (2019)
47. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H, and Hamilton, HA. Social networking sites and mental health problems in adolescents: the mediating role of cyberbullying victimization. Eur Psychiatry J Assoc Eur Psychiatr. (2015) 30:1021–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.09.011
48. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H. Link to external site this link will open in a new window, Chaput J-P, Hamilton HA. Social media use, school connectedness, and academic performance among adolescents. J Prim Prev N Y. (2019) 40:189–211. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00543-6
49. Kessler, RC, Andrews, G, Colpe, LJ, Hiripi, E, Mroczek, DK, Normand, SLT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. (2002) 32:959–76. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006074
50. Yiengprugsawan, V, Kelly, M, and Tawatsupa, B. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale In: AC Michalos, editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (2014). 3469–70.
51. Prochaska, J, Sung, H-Y, Max, W, Shi, Y, and Ong, M. Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. (2012) 21:88–97. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1349
52. Okoro, CA, Dhingra, SS, and Li, C. A triple play: psychological distress, physical comorbidities, and access and use of health services among U.S. adults with disabilities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. (2014) 25:814–36. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0103
53. Frajerman, A, Rolland, F, Falissard, B, Bertschy, G, Diquet, B, and Marra, D. COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on French health students: a cross-sectional study during the third wave. J Affect Disord. (2022) 311:165–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.087
54. Ferro, MA. The psychometric properties of the Kessler psychological distress scale (K6) in an epidemiological sample of Canadian youth. Can J Psychiatr. (2019) 64:647–57. doi: 10.1177/0706743718818414
55. Kipke, MD. Risks and Opportunities: Synthesis of Studies on Adolescence. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press (1999).
56. Fang, K, Mu, M, Liu, K, and He, Y. Screen time and childhood overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev. (2019) 45:744–53. doi: 10.1111/cch.12701
57. Mazur, A, Caroli, M, Radziewicz-Winnicki, I, Nowicka, P, Weghuber, D, Neubauer, D, et al. Reviewing and addressing the link between mass media and the increase in obesity among European children: the European academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and the European childhood obesity group (ECOG) consensus statement. Acta Paediatr. (2018) 107:568–76. doi: 10.1111/apa.14136
58. Kinge, JM, Øverland, S, Flatø, M, Dieleman, J, Røgeberg, O, Magnus, MC, et al. Parental income and mental disorders in children and adolescents: prospective register-based study. Int J Epidemiol. (2021) 50:1615–27. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab066
59. van Vuuren, CL, Wachter, GG, Veenstra, R, Rijnhart, JJM, van der Wal, MF, Chinapaw, MJM, et al. Associations between overweight and mental health problems among adolescents, and the mediating role of victimization. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:612. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6832-z
60. Silva, M, Loureiro, A, and Cardoso, G. Social determinants of mental health: a review of the evidence. Eur J Psychiatry. (2016) 30:259–92.
61. Goodman, E, Adler, NE, Kawachi, I, Frazier, AL, Huang, B, and Colditz, GA. Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics. (2001) 108:E31. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e31
62. World Health Organization WHO Anthro and Macros—Version 3.2.2 2011. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: https://www.nutritioncluster.net/node/4825 (Accessed February 9, 2022).
63. Oberst, U, Wegmann, E, Stodt, B, Brand, M, and Chamarro, A. Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: the mediating role of fear of missing out. J Adolesc. (2017) 55:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.008
64. Woods, HC, and Scott, H. #Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J Adolesc. (2016) 51:41–9. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.008
65. Akkın Gürbüz, HG, Demir, T, Gökalp Özcan, B, Kadak, MT, and Poyraz, BÇ. Use of social network sites among depressed adolescents. Behav Inform Technol. (2017) 36:517–23. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1262898
66. Marengo, D, Longobardi, C, Fabris, MA, and Settanni, M. Highly-visual social media and internalizing symptoms in adolescence: the mediating role of body image concerns. Comput Hum Behav. (2018) 82:63–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.003
67. Twenge, JM, and Martin, GN. Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: evidence from three large datasets. J Adolesc. (2020) 79:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.018
68. Hunt, MG, Marx, R, Lipson, C, and Young, J. No more FOMO: limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. J Soc Clin Psychol. (2018) 37:751–68. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751
69. Murray, M, Maras, D, and Goldfield, GS. Excessive Time on Social Networking Sites and Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Undergraduate Students: Appearance and Weight Esteem as Mediating Pathways. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2016) 19:709–715. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0384
70. Thai, H, Davis, CG, Mahboob, W, Perry, S, Adams, A, and Goldfield, GS. Reducing Social Media Use Improves Appearance and Weight Esteem in Youth with Emotional Distress. Washington, DC: Psychology of Popular Media (2023).
71. Thai, H, Davis, C, Stewart, N, Gunnell, K, and Goldfield, GS. The effects of reducing social media use on body esteem among transitional-aged youth. J Soc Clin Psychol. (2021) 40:481–507. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2021.40.6.481
72. Mougharbel, F, and Goldfield, GS. Psychological correlates of sedentary screen time behavior among children and adolescents: a narrative review. Curr Obes Rep. (2020) 9:493–511. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00401-1
73. Schønning, V, Hjetland, GJ, Aarø, LE, and Skogen, JC. Social media use and mental health and well-being among adolescents—a scoping review. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:1949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949
74. Yang, Q, Liu, J, and Rui, J. Association between social network sites use and mental illness: a meta-analysis. Cyberpsychol J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace. (2022) 16. doi: 10.5817/CP2022-1-1
75. Li, X, Buxton, OM, Lee, S, Chang, A-M, Berger, LM, and Hale, L. Sleep mediates the association between adolescent screen time and depressive symptoms. Sleep Med. (2019) 57:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.01.029
76. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H, Chaput, J-P, Hamilton, HA, and Colman, I. Bullying involvement, psychological distress, and short sleep duration among adolescents. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2018) 53:1371–80. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1590-2
77. Vogel, EA, and Rose, JP. Self-reflection and interpersonal connection: making the most of self-presentation on social media. Transl Issues Psychol Sci. (2016) 2:294–302. doi: 10.1037/tps0000076
78. Pera, A. Psychopathological processes involved in social comparison, depression, and envy on Facebook. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00022
79. Blomfield Neira, CJ, and Barber, BL. Social networking site use: linked to adolescents’ social self-concept, self-esteem, and depressed mood. Aust J Psychol. (2014) 66:56–64. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12034
80. McCarthy, PA, and Morina, N. Exploring the association of social comparison with depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2020) 27:640–71. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2452
81. Paxton, SJ, Neumark-Sztainer, D, Hannan, PJ, and Eisenberg, ME. Body dissatisfaction prospectively predicts depressive mood and low self-esteem in adolescent girls and boys. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Off J Soc Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div. (2006) 53:539–49. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_5
82. Shin, NY, and Shin, MS. Body dissatisfaction, self-esteem, and depression in obese Korean children. J Pediatr. (2008) 152:502–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.020
83. Steg, L, Keizer, K, Buunk, AP, and Rothengatter, T. Applied Social Psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (2017).
84. Bottino, SMB, Bottino, CMC, Regina, CG, Correia, AVL, and Ribeiro, WS. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cad Saude Publ. (2015) 31:463–75. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00036114
85. Hoge, E, Bickham, D, and Cantor, J. Digital media, anxiety, and depression in children. Pediatrics. (2017) 140:S76–80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1758G
86. Petersen, IT, Bates, JE, Dodge, KA, Lansford, JE, and Pettit, GS. Describing and predicting developmental profiles of externalizing problems from childhood to adulthood. Dev Psychopathol. (2015) 27:791–818. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000789
87. Magis-Weinberg, L, Ballonoff Suleiman, A, and Dahl, RE. Context, development, and digital media: implications for very Young adolescents in LMICs. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:632713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632713
88. Calandri, E, Graziano, F, and Rollé, L. Social media, depressive symptoms and well-being in early adolescence. The moderating role of emotional self-efficacy and gender. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:660740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660740
89. Charmaraman, L, Richer, AM, Liu, C, Lynch, AD, and Moreno, MA. Early adolescent social media-related body dissatisfaction: associations with depressive symptoms, social anxiety, peers, and celebrities. J Dev Behav Pediatr JDBP. (2021) 42:401–7. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000911
90. Dahl, RE, Allen, NB, Wilbrecht, L, and Suleiman, AB. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature. (2018) 554:441–50. doi: 10.1038/nature25770
91. Brinthaupt, T, and Lipka, R. Understanding Early Adolescent Self and Identity: Applications and Interventions. (2002) Albany, New York: Suny Press.
92. Crone, EA, and Konijn, EA. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x
93. Somerville, LH. Special issue on the teenage brain: sensitivity to social evaluation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. (2013) 22:121–7. doi: 10.1177/0963721413476512
94. Fitton, VA, Ahmedani, BK, Harold, RD, and Shifflet, ED. The role of technology on Young adolescent development: implications for policy, research and practice. Child Adolesc Soc Work J. (2013) 30:399–413. doi: 10.1007/s10560-013-0296-2
95. Camerini, A-L, Marciano, L, Carrara, A, and Schulz, PJ. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics Inform. (2020) 49:101362. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362
96. Hamm, MP, Newton, AS, Chisholm, A, Shulhan, J, Milne, A, Sundar, P, et al. Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and Young people: a scoping review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatr. (2015) 169:770–7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944
97. Nesi, J. The impact of social media on youth mental health: challenges and opportunities. N C Med J. (2020) 81:116–21. doi: 10.18043/ncm.81.2.116
98. Rutter, LA, Thompson, HM, Howard, J, Riley, TN, Jesús-Romero, RD, and Lorenzo-Luaces, L. Social media use, physical activity, and internalizing symptoms in adolescence: cross-sectional analysis. JMIR Ment Health. (2021) 8:e26134. doi: 10.2196/26134
99. Viner, RM, Gireesh, A, Stiglic, N, Hudson, LD, Goddings, A-L, Ward, JL, et al. Roles of cyberbullying, sleep, and physical activity in mediating the effects of social media use on mental health and wellbeing among young people in England: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2019) 3:685–96. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30186-5
100. Calandri, E, Graziano, F, Cattelino, E, and Testa, S. Depressive symptoms and loneliness in early adolescence: the role of empathy and emotional self-efficacy. J Early Adolesc. (2021) 41:369–93. doi: 10.1177/0272431620919156
101. Rideout, V. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens. San Francisco, California: Common Sense Media (2015).
102. Rose, AJ, and Rudolph, KD. A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychol Bull. (2006) 132:98–131. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
103. Vannucci, A, and McCauley, OC. Self-competence and depressive symptom trajectories during adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2018) 46:1089–109. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0340-3
104. Bandura, A, Caprara, GV, Barbaranelli, C, Gerbino, M, and Pastorelli, C. Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Dev. (2003) 74:769–82. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00567
105. Grazzani, I, Corti, I, Ornaghi, V, Antoniotti, C, and Pepe, A. Regolazione delle emozioni, autoefficacia emotiva ed empatia: una ricerca in preadolescenza. Psicol Clin Dello Sviluppo. (2015) 19:429–48. doi: 10.1449/81775
106. Verduyn, P, Ybarra, O, Résibois, M, Jonides, J, and Kross, E. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Soc Issues Policy Rev. (2017) 11:274–302. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12033
107. Vaala, SE, and Bleakley, A. Monitoring, mediating, and modeling: parental influence on adolescent computer and internet use in the United States. J Child Media. (2015) 9:40–57. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.997103
108. de Ayala, L, López, MC, Sendín Gutierrez, JC, and García, JA. Problematic internet use among Spanish adolescents: the predictive role of internet preference and family relationships. Eur. J Commun. (2015) 30:470–85. doi: 10.1177/0267323115586725
109. Schmuck, D. Following social media influencers in early adolescence: fear of missing out, social well-being and supportive communication with parents. J Comput-Mediat Commun. (2021) 26:245–64. doi: 10.1093/jcmc/zmab008
110. Sampasa-Kanyinga, H, Lalande, K, and Colman, I. Cyberbullying victimisation and internalising and externalising problems among adolescents: the moderating role of parent–child relationship and child’s sex. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2018) 29:e8. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000653
111. Bloemen, N, and De Coninck, D. Social media and fear of missing out in adolescents: the role of family characteristics. Soc Media Soc. (2020) 6:2056305120965517. doi: 10.1177/2056305120965517
112. Chang, F-C, Chiu, C-H, Miao, N-F, Chen, P-H, Lee, C-M, Chiang, J-T, et al. The relationship between parental mediation and internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Compr Psychiatry. (2015) 57:21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.013
113. Kerr, M, and Stattin, H. What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Dev Psychol. (2000) 36:366–80. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366
114. Kerr, M, Stattin, H, and Burk, WJ. A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. J Res Adolesc. (2010) 20:39–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00623.x
115. Przybylski, AK, Murayama, K, DeHaan, CR, and Gladwell, V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput Hum Behav. (2013) 29:1841–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
116. Bahramian, E, Mazaheri, MA, and Hasanzadeh, A. The relationship between media literacy and psychological well-being in adolescent girls in Semirom city. J Educ Health Promot. (2018) 7:148. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_41_18
Keywords: social media, psychological distress, mental health, adolescents, screen time
Citation: Mougharbel F, Chaput J-P, Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Hamilton HA, Colman I, Leatherdale ST and Goldfield GS (2023) Heavy social media use and psychological distress among adolescents: the moderating role of sex, age, and parental support. Front. Public Health. 11:1190390. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190390
Edited by:
Barna Konkolÿ Thege, Waypoint Center for Mental Health Care, CanadaReviewed by:
Cihad Dundar, Ondokuz Mayıs University, TürkiyeGeorgina Warner, Uppsala University, Sweden
Copyright © 2023 Mougharbel, Chaput, Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hamilton, Colman, Leatherdale and Goldfield. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gary S. Goldfield, Z2dvbGRmaWVsZEBjaGVvLm9uLmNh