Impact of socioeconomic position on the utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury

Aim: This study aimed to explore the utilization of rehabilitation services and associated socioeconomic position (SEP) factors among Chinese older adults disabled by injury.

Methods: Data from the second China National Sample Survey on Disability (CSSD) were used in this study. Chi-square test was used to analyze the significant differences between groups, and binary logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for socioeconomic factors associated with utilization of rehabilitation services among Chinese older adults disabled by injury.

Results: Among the older adults disabled by injury in the CSSD, the gap between demand and utilization of medical treatment, assistive devices and rehabilitation training were around 38, 75, and 64%, respectively. This study revealed two relationship patterns (“high-low-high” and “low-high-low”) among SEP, prevalence of injury-caused disability and odds of utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury, that is, the older adult with higher SEP have a lower prevalence of injury-caused disability, but a higher odds of utilization of rehabilitation services; conversely, the older adults with lower SEP have a relatively higher prevalence but a lower odds of utilization of rehabilitation services.

Conclusion: There is a large gap between the high demand and low utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury, especially for those living in the central or western regions or rural areas, without insurance or disability certificate, having the annual household per capita income lower than the national average or lower educational level. Strategies to improve the disability manage system, to strengthen the chain of “information discovery-information transmission-rehabilitation services supply-continuous health monitoring and management” for the older adults disabled by injury are warranted. In view of the poor and illiterate groups among the disabled older adults, to enhance medical aids and popularize the scientific information to compensate for the lack of affordability and awareness of rehabilitation services utilization is essential. In addition, it is necessary to further expand the coverage and improve the payment system of medical insurance for rehabilitation services.

Introduction

Injury has become the main cause of death and disability in most countries (1), accounting for 8% of the global causes of death (2). Temporary or permanent disability by injury contributes to an even greater disease burden (3). In China, injury has exceeded infectious diseases and ranked the second cause of the disease burden. Every year, there are 700,000–800,000 deaths and 62 million emergency visits due to injury (4). With the growth of population life expectancy in China, the percentage of life expectancy with disability is also continuously expanding, and is expected to increase from 9.60% in 2015 to 14.54% in 2050 (5). The problem of “disability expansion” is more severe among the older adults in China, which is estimated to experience 5.78 years lived with disability in 2015, and this number is expected to increase to 11.45 in 2050 (5). The years lived with disability (YLD) caused by injury among the older adults over 70 years old has increased year by year since 2005 (6).

Rehabilitation service needs are universal, a conclusion confirmed by a study based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019, which estimates that in 2019, 2.41 billion individuals had conditions that would benefit from rehabilitation, that is, at least one in every three people in the world needs rehabilitation at some point in the course of their illness or injury (7). However, the utilization of rehabilitation services is disproportionately insufficient (8, 9). As for the injury-caused disabled, a Chinese study revealed the challenge of significant under-utilization of rehabilitation services (10).

Based on this, some studies have explored more possible strategies to remove the barriers to the utilization of rehabilitation services for the disabled from the perspective of the socioeconomic position (SEP). And yet, to the best of our knowledge, there may be few studies on rehabilitation services and associated SEP factors for the Chinese older adults disabled by injury. Taken all these into consideration, this article analyzes the utilization of rehabilitation services and related SEP factors for the Chinese older adults with injury-caused disability. In this way, it aims to supplement the research in this field and provide empirical data in making rehabilitation policies for the older adults disabled by injury in China.

Methods

Data source

In this study, the Second National Sampling Survey on Disability in China in 2006 (CSSD) database was used to extract samples of the older adults aged 60 and above who were disabled by injury. It adopts the stratified, multi-stage and cluster probability proportional sampling method. It covers a total of 2,526,145 people from 771,797 households in 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and cities, with a sampling ratio of 1.93‰. The survey data is authentic (11).

Core concepts

Disability

Disability refers to the abnormality or the loss of anatomical structure and physiological function caused by various physical and mental diseases, or injuries, or congenital abnormalities, which results in long-term, continuous or permanent dysfunction of the body that cannot be cured (12).

Injury

Injury is defined as tissue damage or hypoxia by asphyxia that affect individual activities and need treatment or rehabilitation, resulting from energy transfer or interference exceeding the limits of biological endurance (13).

Injury-caused disability

Injury-caused disability is defined as a person who completely or partially loses the ability to engage in certain activities normally due to the loss or abnormality of certain organization or function in physiology and psychology caused by injury (10).

Medical rehabilitation

As an important part of rehabilitation, medical rehabilitation is the application of rehabilitation concept in the medical field. It refers to healing the dysfunction of the sick, the injured, and the disabled through medical means (14). The rehabilitation referred to in CSSD is medical rehabilitation, including medical treatment, assistive devices and rehabilitation training.

Socioeconomic position

Socioeconomic position (SEP) is an economic and sociological combined total measure of an individual's or family's economic access to resources and social position in relation to others (15, 16). When analyzing SEP, three variables, namely, income, education, and occupation are examined (17).

Study design and subjects

This research aims to study the demand and utilization of rehabilitation services in the Chinese older adults aged 60 and above who are disabled by injury, and the correlation between the utilization of rehabilitation services and individual's SEP. In the CSSD, it lists only organic and non-organic mental disorders as the causes of mental disability based on ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, failing to examine the injury-related causes (18, 19). Therefore, this research focuses on the older adults with vision, hearing, speech, physical, and intellectual disabilities. Following the existing research (20, 21), this paper extracts the injury-related causes of disability from the CSSD as follows (Table 1):

TABLE 1

Table 1. Injury-related causes of disability in the CSSD.

In this study, the dependent variable is “the usage of rehabilitation services”, that is, as long as any one of “medical services and assistance, assistive devices, rehabilitation training and services” is used, the participant is considered to have used rehabilitation services. Since the older adult/adults are less affected by occupation, the explanatory variables of SEP include annual household per capita income and educational level. The higher the annual household per capita income or educational level, the higher the SEP. In the descriptive analysis, the annual disposable per capita income of urban residents in China in 2006 was 11,759 yuan, and the per capita net income of rural residents was 3,587 yuan, according to the data of the National Bureau of Statistics. In this study, the annual per capita income of urban households that is higher than 11,759 yuan and the per capita net income of rural households that is higher 3,587 yuan are defined as higher than the annual per capita income of national residents (22). In addition, according to regulation of the National Bureau of Statistics, the Eastern China includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong and Hainan; the Central China includes Shanxi, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei and Hunan; the Western China includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang; and the Northeastern China includes Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang (23).

Ethical approval

These surveys were approved by the State Council [Guo Ban Fa No. 77 (1986); Guo Ban Fa No. 73 (2004)] and the survey plan was formulated in accordance with the Statistics Law of the People's Republic of China and the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Disabled Persons. During the surveys, all respondents provided informed consent to participate in the surveys and clinical diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Stata 16.0 was used for data analysis. Chi square test was employed for univariate analysis, and binary logistic regression was adopted for multivariate analysis. Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used for the test of goodness of fit of the model. The significance level was 0.05.

Results

Prevalence of injury-caused disability in the older adults

A total of 354,859 elders were surveyed in CSSD, including 85,260 disabled elders. Among them, 10,314 older adults people were disabled by injury, with the prevalence of 291/10,000 (number of the disabled older adults by injury in CSSD/total number of the older adults in CSSD), accounting for 12.1% of all older adults disabled people. The prevalence of physical disability by injury is the highest in this group (151/10,000) (number of the older adults with physical disabilities caused by injury and without other kinds of disabilities in CSSD/total number of the older adults in CSSD), followed by hearing disability (71/10,000). On the contrary, the prevalence is relatively low for the visual (12/10,000), intellectual (2/10,000), and speech (0.4/10,000) disabilities caused by injury in the older adults. As for the disability grading, most injury-caused disability in the older adult is mild (grade IV), accounting for nearly 57% of the total, followed by moderate (grade III, nearly 28%). Severe (grade II) and extremely severe (grade I) disabled elders account for only 15%.

In terms of SEP factors, the injury-caused disability in the older adults shows a higher prevalence in the groups of those with the annual household per capita income lower than the national average (prevalence = 306/10,000, reference: those with the annual household per capita income higher than the national average, prevalence = 224/10,000), the illiteracy/with no schooling (prevalence = 321/10,000, reference: primary school or above, reference = 267/10,000) (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Comparison of the prevalence of the disabled older adults by injury with different SEP.

The demand and utilization of rehabilitation services of the older adults with injury-related disability

There is a large gap between the high demand and low utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury (hereinafter referred to as the “rehabilitation gap”). Thirty-eight percentage of demand for medical treatment, 75% for assistive devices and 64% for rehabilitation training are left unsatisfied. Based on social and demographic factors, there is little difference in the rehabilitation gap among different disability grades, gender, age groups, and marital status. However, the rehabilitation gap is relatively larger among the older adults with injury-related disability who (1) live in the central or western regions, (2) are rural residents, (3) without insurance, (4) without disability certificate, (5) have the annual household per capita income lower than the national average, and (6) are illiterate or with no schooling (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Demand and utilization of rehabilitation services of the older adults with injury-related disability.

Associated SEP factors of rehabilitation service utilization among the older adults with disability caused by injury

Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out with “the usage of rehabilitation services” as the dependent variable; and disability grade, gender, age, marital status, region, residence (rural/urban), insurance status, and disability certificate status as the control variables; and annual household per capita income, educational level as the explanatory variables. The assignment of independent variables is shown in Table 4. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test result shows that Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² = 12.77, P = 0.12 > 0.05, which means that the model fits better.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Variables assignment.

The results show that after controlling the variables of disability grade, gender, age, marital status, region, residence (rural/urban), insurance status, and disability certificate status, the odds of utilization of rehabilitation services is much higher in the groups of participants that (1) with higher annual household per capita income (OR = 1.184, 95%CI 1.054–1.329, reference: annual household per capita income < national average), (2) have been to primary school or above (OR = 1.143, 95%CI 1.038–1.256, reference: illiteracy/no schooling) (Table 5).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Regression analysis of the SEP factors on whether the older adults disabled by injury utilize the rehabilitation services.

Discussion

The gap between the utilization of rehabilitation services and the demand is large for the older adults disabled by injury. Rehabilitation services needs are universal (7). As for the older adults, their needs for rehabilitation services are neglected more serious (24, 25). There are few studies on the utilization of rehabilitation services for the older adult/adults disabled by injury in China. An similar study based on CSSD shows that the rehabilitation gap for the older adults disabled by injury is nearly 40% (26). This study pointed out the problem of low utilization rate of rehabilitation services from the perspective of all the disabled by injury. In addition, this study revealed two relationship patterns (“high-low-high” and “low-high-low”) among SEP, prevalence of injury-caused disability and odds of utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury, that is, the older adults with higher SEP have a lower prevalence of injury-caused disability, but a higher odds of utilization of rehabilitation services; conversely, the older adults with lower SEP have a relatively higher prevalence but a lower odds of utilization of rehabilitation services.

Existing research showed a “inverse combination” pattern between individual health status and SEP (27), that is, the lower the SEP, the worse the individual health status (28). This explains the inverse combination of the SEP and the prevalence of disability by injury among the older adults in this study. educational level (29–31) and income (32, 33) are two important factors affecting the utilization of health services, and the mechanism by which they affect the individual behaviors mainly are the two intermediate factors of “intention” and “affordability”. The essence of individual utilization of health services is consumption behavior. Based on the economic theory, “intention” and “affordability” are the two determinants of consumption behavior. Some foundation theories have emphasized the important effects of income and education on individual health services utilization behavior. Anderson health services utilization behavior model points out that “intention” comes from the individual awareness of the gap between their actual health level and the ideal state or the diagnosis from a medical professional, as well as the individual's analysis of the benefits of the health behaviors, which involves the individual's health literacy affected by the educational level deeply (34). Affordability is mainly determined by individual “ability resources”, that is, the ability of individuals to obtain health service resources, in which income is the basic composition (34). There is also an important psychological variable between “intention” and “affordability”. Social psychologist Icek Ajzen believes that “perceived behavioral control” is an important intermediary in the transformation path from intention to action (35). Through the judgment of affordability, individual clearly assesses the difficulty of taking practical actions, and then decides whether to adopt healthy behaviors. In addition, the social ecology model also reveals that individual behavior is determined by individual ability, knowledge, motivation, etc. (36).

Limitations

However, there are some limitations that require consideration. First, It fails to distinguish mentally disabled persons due to injury in the CSSD database. Therefore, this study lacks the situation of mentally disabled people. Second, The CSSD database is relatively old and has limited practical guidance. Nonetheless, it is still the latest national sampling survey on disability in China.

Conclusions

Facing the current situation of limited rehabilitation services in China, it is an essential means to improve the efficiency of rehabilitation services by clarifying the vulnerable groups of people with injury-caused disability and taking precise assistance measures. To be more specific, according to the distribution of the prevalence of injury-related disability and the utilization rate of rehabilitation services among different older adults groups, targeted measures should be taken based on their specific characteristics, especially the rural residents or people living in the central or western regions, poverty-stricken people, people with low educational level, or without insurance and disability certificate among the older adults. Strategies to improve the disability manage system, to strengthen the chain of “information discovery-information transmission-rehabilitation services supply-continuous health monitoring and management” for the older adults with injury-caused disability are warranted, especially for the vulnerable groups aforementioned. In view of the poor and illiterate groups, to enhance medical aids and popularize the scientific information to compensate for the lack of affordability and awareness of rehabilitation services utilization is essential. In addition, it is necessary to further expand the coverage and improve the payment system of medical insurance for rehabilitation services.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Institute of Population Research of Peking University (IPR). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available with the permission of IPR. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to 00-86-010-62751974.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

Y-RW is responsible for conceptualizing, data analysis, formal interpretation of results, and writing the manuscript. Y-NL is responsible for conceptualizing, critical revision of article for important intellectual content, and writing—review and editing. Y-LF and Y-YF are responsibility for revision of article. X-YZ is responsible for conceptualizing the study, methodology, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by National Social Science Foundation of China (Major Program) (No. 21ZD107) and National Science and Technology Major Project (No. SQ2022YFC3600291).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health. (2000) 90:523–6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.4.523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates: Life Expectancy and Leading Causes of Death and Disability. (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates (accessed April 14, 2022).

3. Wang YR, Dai WW, Su BB, Fan HY, Li JJ, Zheng XY. Demand evaluation of rehabilitation services and analysis of supply and demand gap. Rehabil Theory Pract China. (2022) 6:725–9.

PubMed Abstract

4. Huang MQ,. The Future of Trauma Treatment: The Annual Report on Trauma in China has Been Started. (2020). Available online at: http://med.china.com.cn/content/pid/209632/tid/1015 (accessed June 21, 2022).

5. Luo YN, Su BB, Zheng XY. Trends and challenges for population and health during population aging in China, 2015-2050. CCDC Weekly. (2021) 3:593–8. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation. GBD 2019. (2022). Available online at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed April 14, 2022).

7. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:2006–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhao XT, Wang HC. Factors influencing the utilization of healthcare and rehabilitation services by elders with disabilities. J Zhejiang Univ (Human Soc Sci Ed). (2022) 52:165–76.

9. Fan YY, Wang YY, Zheng XY. Rehabilitation service utilization and its associated factors among the elderly with disability in China. China Health Policy Research. (2022) 15:31–9.

10. Zhang L, Zheng XY. Influencing factors analysis on demands satisfactory of multi-level services for People with Disabilities Caused by Injuries. Injury Med (Electr Vers). (2017) 1:39–44.

11. The Leading Group of the Second National Sampling Survey of Disabled Persons. Main Data of the Second National Sampling Survey of Disabled Persons in 2006 (No. 1). (2009). Available online at: http://www.gov.cn/fuwu/cjr/2009-05/08/content_2630950.htm (accessed April 13, 2022).

12. Termonline. Disability. (2014). Available online at: https://www.termonline.cn/word/123883/1#s1 (accessed June 21, 2022).

13. Wang SY. Injury Epidemiology. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (2003).

Google Scholar

14. Huang XH, Yan TB, Wang NH. Rehabilitation Medicine, 6th ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (2018). p. 2.

15. Oakes JM, Rossi PH. The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med. (2003) 56:769–84. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Palta P, Szanton SL, Semba RD, Thorpe RJ, Varadhan R, Fried LP. Financial strain is associated with increased oxidative stress levels: the women's health and aging studies. Geriatr Nurs. (2015) 36:S33–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Winters-Miner LA, Bolding PS, Hilbe JM, Goldstein M, Hill T, Nisbet R, et al. Practical Predictive Analytics and Decisioning Systems for Medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2015). p. 757–794.

Google Scholar

18. Huang YQ, Yao GZ, Dong WT. Interpretation of mental disability grading criteria. Disabil China. (2006) 7:35.

19. Liu TL, Pang LH, Wen X, Chen G, Zheng XY. Characteristics of co-morbid psychiatric disability and injury caused disability in Chinese population. Chin J Epidemiol. (2015) 36:344–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2015.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Dai JF, Wang SY, Wang C, Zhao GX, Dong XM. Epidemiological study on disability caused by injury in the Chinese population. Chin J Epidemiol. (2010) 31:1107–10. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2010.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zheng XY, Chen G, Song XM, Cui B, Zhang Jun, Zhang HK, et al. Research report on disability prevention strategy in China. In:Cheng K, Zheng XY, , editor. Study on the Disability Prevention Strategy in China. Beijing: Peking University Publishing House (2015). p. 24–26.

22. Xie HG,. Reviewing China's Development from the Statistical Bulletin. (2007). Available online at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/ztjc/ztfx/gbjd/200703/t20070301_52611.html (accessed February 17, 2023).

Google Scholar

23. National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical System and Classification Standard. (2022). Available online at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjzs/cjwtjd/201308/t20130829_74318.html (accessed February 17, 2023).

24. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Grande G, Loewel H, Völler H, Mittag O. Gender-specific issues in cardiac rehabilitation: do women with ischaemic heart disease need specially tailored programmes? Eur J Prevent Cardiol. (2007) 14:163–71. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3280128bce

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Prescott M, Lilley-Kelly A, Cundill B, Clarke D, Drake S, Farrin AJ, et al. Home-based Extended Rehabilitation for Older people (HERO): study protocol for an individually randomised controlled multi-centre trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based exercise intervention for older people with frailty as extended rehabilitation following acute illness or injury, including embedded process evaluation. Trials. (2021) 22:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05778-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hu XY, Zhang S, Zhang J, Zhang L. Analysis of the demand and utilization of rehabilitation services for the disabled by injury in China. Injury Med (Electr Vers). (2014) 1:27–34.

27. Hong YB, Chen YS. Group differences in education's impact on health (2005-2012): resource substitution and disadvantage overlay. Soc Dev Res. (2017) 1:1–18+242.

28. Lahelma E. Health and social stratification. In:Cockerham WC, , editor. The Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell (2008). p. 64–93.

Google Scholar

29. Neighbors HW, Woodward AT, Bullard KMK, Ford BC, Taylor RJ, Jackson JS. Mental health service use among older African Americans: the National Survey of American Life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 12:948–56. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187ddd3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kretzler B, König H H, Brandt L, Weiss HR, Hajek A. Religious denomination, religiosity, religious attendance, and cancer prevention. System Rev Risk Manag Healthcare Policy. (2022) 15:45. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S341085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Boyas J F, Negi N J, Valera P. Factors associated to health care service use among Latino day laborers. Am J Men's Health. (2017) 4:1028–38. doi: 10.1177/1557988317694297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Demissie B, Negeri K G. Effect of community-based health insurance on utilization of outpatient health care services in Southern Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2020) 13:141. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S215836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kim J L, Cho J, Park S, Park EC. Depression symptom and professional mental health service use. BMC Psychiatry. (2015) 1:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0646-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Chen MS. The development and application of Andersen's behavioral model on health care utilization. J Nanjing Med Univ (Soc Sci). (2018) 18:5–8. doi: 10.7655/NYDXBSS20180102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. (1991) 2:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. (1988) 15:351–77. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar