Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson- College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
For decades, Black mothers have been most likely to suffer the worst outcomes of pregnancy, including death. Even though traditional individual level risk factors do not explain racial inequities in maternal morbidity, most studies identify Black race as a predictor, instead of the ways in which our society is structured around racism that makes Black mothers vulnerable to adverse health outcomes. As an example, the U.S is exceptional in incarcerating its residents, and Black men are six times and Black women are three times more likely than their white counterparts to be incarcerated. Relatedly, violent death caused by homicides disproportionately impacts Black communities, such that is the leading cause of death for males and females aged 10–34 years. Estimates suggest that more than 50% of urban residents know more than 10 murder victims, and approximately 200 people are affected by each neighborhood murder. Recent research has begun to shed light on the impacts of stressful neighborhood social conditions on risk of the adverse birth outcomes among Black mothers however, few studies have quantified the impact of macro-social neighborhood factors like violent death exposures and mass incarceration on Black maternal health. Future research that leverages relevant theoretical frameworks, is co-created and co-led with affected communities, and focuses on relevant neighborhood level traumas is warranted if we are to address the longstanding racial inequities in maternal health.
Introduction
“If you are silent about your pain, they'll kill you and say you enjoyed it.” -Zora Neale Hurston (1).
If maternal mortality is the tip of the iceberg then maternal morbidity is the base (2, 3). We can understand maternal health as a continuum, with optimal pregnancy outcomes for the mother on one end of the spectrum, and maternal mortality on the other (4, 5). Over the past several decades, maternal mortality has increased nearly two-fold (3), and the rising prevalence of chronic conditions (including obesity, hypertension, and diabetes) as well as cesarean births are likely contributing causes (6). For instance, pregnancy can worsen pre-existing conditions and increase risk for pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, severe maternal morbidities like heart attack, and the worse outcome of pregnancy- maternal death (7). Pregnancy normally causes increased cardiac output, heart rate, and blood volume, all of which can cause cardiac strain (8). Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of maternal mortality (9), and mothers who endure and survive complications of pregnancy, like preeclampsia, have increased risk of long-term metabolic and cardiovascular disease (10–13).
Racial Inequities
Black people are at least 3 times more likely to die from pregnancy related causes than white people, across all age groups (14). From epidemiologic studies we know that Black mothers are also more likely than white mothers to have maternal morbidities, irrespective of the varied definition of “morbidity” across studies (9). Black people are disproportionately burdened by cardiovascular disease risk factors and myocardial infarction during pregnancy, (15) as well as more severe peripartum cardiomyopathy disease (at diagnosis and unfortunately even 6 and 12 months post-diagnosis) (16). Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample suggests that Black women are also disproportionately burdened by cerebrovascular events in the peripartum period (17, 18), as well as severe pulmonary complications (19). From 1997 to 2014, severe maternal morbidity increased by 179% in Black women compared to 163% in white women (20). Further, Black women have higher rates of hospital readmission (21, 22), pregnancy associated hospitalization (23), and emergency department visits during the 90 days after delivery (24). Notably, studies have consistently identified racial inequities in maternal mortality across racial groups, after accounting for biomedical, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors (25, 26). The racial inequities in maternal health have been sufficiently documented in analyses comparing Black to other populations. Going forward, novel within-group analyses (comparing Black people to Black people) (27, 28) to identify policy and intervention relevant structural determinants of poor health (29) as well as intervening pathways and protective factors within the groups that have been made vulnerable to race, class, and gender oppression are warranted.
The Social Context as an Overlooked Determinant
Social context, which can be understood as the social and political drivers of hierarchies and social stratification, including but not limited to policies and macroeconomic factors (30), has not been the focus of the majority of extant research on racial inequities in maternal health. Unjust exposure to health-harming macro-social factors are likely important drivers of the disproportionate burden of poor health in Black communities (31, 32). Research on determinants of poor maternal health across racialized groups overwhelmingly focuses on individual-level comorbidities (33). Few existing studies examine or acknowledge the relationship between racial inequities in maternal health and structural racism, which includes the social policies, institutional practices, cultural depictions, and other norms that reinforce, uphold, and perpetuate racial inequities (34). This is an important gap in the literature on this topic, especially given evidence that Black people have lower prevalence of five of the common high-risk pregnancy complications, yet have between 2.4–3.3 times higher likelihood of death due to these complications, compared to white people (19).
Unjust Exposure to Mass Incarceration
Social determinants that are a function of racism and specifically and unequally burden Black people have not been examined as risk factors of poor maternal outcomes using within group analyses. For instance, exposures to “mass incarceration,” which refers to the extreme historical and contemporary levels of incarceration, occurrences that are so concentrated in communities of color that it becomes a common stage of in life-course (35). Approximately 50% of Black women have an imprisoned relative, compared to only 12% of their white counterparts (36). Further, Black people are more likely than the overall population to know an incarcerated individual, and to have a neighbor or an intimate partner incarcerated (36). Women make up 83% of those responsible for the costs associated with family member's court costs, which results in a financial burden that compounds any existing struggles to meet basic material needs (37). Direct and indirect contact with the criminal justice system exposes millions of Black women to health harming stressors that threaten their health and that of their families. Recent work suggests that women with experiences of incarceration are more likely to suffer premature mortality than those never incarcerated (38). Further, women (but not men) who have an incarcerated relative have been shown to have higher risk of obesity, heart attack, stroke, and fair or poor health, than those who do not (39). Despite specific calls for research on the life-course influences of mass incarceration on the health of Black people and communities (40), few studies have quantified the direct or contextual effect of mass incarceration on poor health and mortality within this group (41), and none have examined its effect on Black maternal health. This distinct over-exposure to incarceration that Black communities experience may be an important contributor to maternal health inequities and research and action to address this crisis is needed (36, 41).
Unjust Exposure to Family and Community Violent Deaths
More than seven people suffer a violent death every hour, in the United States (42). Homicides disproportionately affect Black populations, such that they are the leading cause of death for Black males and females aged 10–34 (43, 44). Research using a community survey found that over half of urban respondents knew more than 10 murder victims, and approximately 200 people are affected by each neighborhood murder (45). While studies have examined the impact of neighborhood crime on adverse birth outcomes (45, 46), none have examined the unique contribution of neighborhood violent death exposures on Black maternal health. One study examined the relationship between neighborhood crime and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using electronic health records linked to police-reported crime incidents, and found null results, likely due to exposure measurement error (47). Indeed, stress from losing a family or community member to violence may negatively impact health promoting behaviors, and poverty and racism likely exacerbate these associations (48). Community, (including state-sanctioned) violence is a public health issue that unjustly affects Black women, who are victims, witnesses, and grieving wives, girlfriends, and mothers of homicide victims. Even when Black people do not experience losing a close relative to violent death, which is rare in many urban areas, the hypervigilance caused by the constant threat of violence negatively impacts the quality of life, mental, and physical health of these people.
Historical and Contemporary Redlining as a Root Cause of Toxic Stress
Residence in disadvantaged neighborhoods is a psychological and physiological stressor (49–51), because neighborhood exposures like social disorder, defined as “visible cues indicating a lack of order and social control” (51), are stress-inducing. Indeed, stressors originating from the neighborhood context are an important contributor to total stress load (52). The “broken windows” theory of urban decline suggests that public disorder causes urban decay and serious crime, and is predictive of poor mental and physical health (53). Black women are more likely to live in disadvantaged neighborhoods throughout their life-course (54), and to experience various family traumas (55). Our understanding of whether and how neighborhoods matter for health has been constrained because much of the literature uses sociodemographic variables from administrative data sources (like from U.S. Census), which may not equal the true neighborhood construct of interest (for example neighborhood disorder or community social ties) (56). Further, there is wide variability in the neighborhood measures used across studies, as is the level of aggregation (census tract, zip codes, block groups, etc.) which makes it difficult to identify what specific neighborhoods characteristics (and at what scale) should be the focus of interventions (56). Unfortunately, we have limited existing data on the predictive ability of structural racism, as manifested by community-level mass incarceration and the community trauma of violent deaths on Black maternal health (26). Nuanced and multi-level quantitative and qualitative (57) evidence on the associations between various manifestations of structural racism on Black maternal health will make it possible to target interventions and policy initiatives at critical periods of exposure across the life-course.
Theory Can Help us Ask Different Research Questions and Find the Right Solutions
Reproductive Justice (RJ), conceptualized by Women of African Descent for Reproductive Justice in 1994, is a concept that can be understood as the merging together of reproductive rights and social justice (58). RJ is defined as the interconnected human rights to: (1) have children under the circumstances of one's choosing, (2) not have children, and (3) parent children in safe and healthy communities that are free from individual and state violence (58). Intersectionality, coined by Kimberle' Crenshaw, offers a framework for understanding the unique intersection of racial and gender oppressions experienced by Black women (59). RJ praxis elaborates how activism around bodily autonomy and intersectionality are connected, and facilitates status quo disruption. RJ articulates that the ability of people to determine their own reproductive destiny is directly influenced by the conditions of their community (60). RJ focuses on organizing women, girls, and their communities to resist structural power inequalities through a complete and transformative process of empowerment, one that improves lives of women, ensures healthy families, and sustainable communities (60). Ecosocial theory of disease distribution (61, 62), suggests that: (1) inequitable racial hierarchies prioritize groups who claim superiority at the expense of those deemed inferior; (2) race is reified as biology to establish racial categories; and (3) inequitable living and working environments facilitate the biological expression of racism and produce racial inequities in health through embodiment (61, 63–65). The ecosocial approach is guided by the question “who and what drives current and changing patterns of social inequalities in health” (62). The principal focus of this theory is how individuals biologically express exposures occurring from societal and ecological contexts. These frameworks have rarely been integrated to understand the linkages between community trauma and the disproportionate burden of adverse maternal health among Black people, but they can help us understand and most importantly intervene on these multi-level, macro-social determinants and move us toward maternal health equity.
Discussion
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects are a critical approach for research on the social-structural determinants of health inequity, and are a crucial part of dismantling oppressive structures (66–68). CBPR projects that focus on associations between macro-social exposures including (but not limited to) community trauma caused by mass incarceration and violent deaths and maternal health of Black people (using within group analyses) are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted and exacerbated longstanding racial inequities in health and resource distribution, should make it clear why research on racialized communities that is not grounded in relevant theories and does not center the lived experience and various ways of knowing of affected communities in the conception, design, implementation, and dissemination stages will cause more harm than good. Given this, research that is focused on the liberation of oppressed communities, and is led by members of affected communities (as equal thought leaders) should be prioritized for funding by local and national funders and philanthropic organizations. This perspective calls for different research questions- ones that are not bound by the current available data, are not based solely the intellectual curiosity of researchers, are informed by relevant theories and frameworks, and use participatory research methodologies for action.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
SS-J conceived of, wrote, and edited the manuscript.
Funding
Support for this manuscript was provided in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant Number 77771). The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Hurston ZN. Their eyes were watching God : a novel. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company Cairns Collection of American Women Writers (1937).
2. Creanga AA. Maternal mortality in the United States: a review of contemporary data and their limitations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 61:296–306. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000362
3. Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 120:1029–36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826d60c5
4. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. Maternal near miss–towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. (2009) 23:287–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007
5. Lu MC, Highsmith K, de la Cruz D, Atrash HK. Putting the “M” back in the maternal and child health bureau: reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Matern Child Health J. (2015) 19:1435–9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1665-6
6. UNICEF. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division (2019).
7. Hirshberg A, Srinivas SK. Epidemiology of maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. (2017) 41:332–7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.007
8. Foley MR, Rokey R, Belfort MA. Cardiac disease. Critic Care Obstet. (2010) 4:252–74. doi: 10.1002/9781444316780.ch20
9. Somer SJH, Sinkey RG, Bryant AS. Epidemiology of racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. (2017) 41:258–65. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.04.001
10. Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. (2009) 373:1773–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5
11. Smith GN, Pudwell J, Walker M, Wen S-W. Risk estimation of metabolic syndrome at one and three years after a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. (2012) 34:836–41. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35382-8
12. Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA. Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet. (2005) 366:1797–803. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67726-4
13. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Hanley AJ, Zinman B. The graded relationship between glucose tolerance status in pregnancy and postpartum levels of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in young women: implications for future cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 95:4345–53. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0361
14. Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011–2013. Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 130:366. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114
15. James AH, Jamison MG, Biswas MS, Brancazio LR, Swamy GK, Myers ER. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy. Circulation. (2006) 113:1564–71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.576751
16. Kao DP, Hsich E, Lindenfeld J. Characteristics, adverse events, and racial differences among delivering mothers with peripartum cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail. (2013) 1:409–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.04.011
17. Bateman BT, Olbrecht VA, Berman MF, Minehart RD, Schwamm LH, Leffert LR. Peripartum subarachnoid hemorrhage: nationwide data and institutional experience. Surv Anesthesiol. (2012) 56:294–5. doi: 10.1097/01.SA.0000422028.34250.1e
18. Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal ethnicity, paternal ethnicity, and parental ethnic discordance: predictors of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. (2005) 106:156–61. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164478.91731.06
19. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The black–white disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health. (2007) 97:247–51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072975
20. Leonard SA, Main EK, Scott KA, Profit J, Carmichael SL. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity prevalence and trends. Ann Epidemiol. (2019) 33:30–6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.02.007
21. Hebert PR, Reed G, Entman SS, Mitchel EF, Berg C, Griffin MR. Serious maternal morbidity after childbirth: prolonged hospital stays and readmissions. Obstet Gynecol. (1999) 94:942–7. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199912000-00008
22. Lee W-C, Phillips CD, Ohsfeldt RL. Do rural and urban women experience differing rates of maternal rehospitalizations? Rural Remote Health. (2015) 15:3335. doi: 10.22605/RRH3335
23. Bacak SJ, Callaghan WM, Dietz PM, Crouse C. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999-2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2005) 192:592–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.638
24. Batra P, Fridman M, Leng M, Gregory KD. Emergency department care in the postpartum period: California births, 2009–2011. Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 130:1073–81. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002269
25. Saftlas AF, Koonin LM, Atrash HK. Racial disparity in pregnancy-related mortality associated with livebirth: can established risk factors explain it? Am J Epidemiol. (2000) 152:413–9. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.5.413
26. Wang E, Glazer KB, Howell EA, Janevic TM. Social determinants of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity in the United States: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 135:896–915. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003762
27. Sealy-Jefferson S, Butler B, Chettri S, et al. Neighborhood evictions, marital/cohabiting status, and preterm birth among African American women. Ethn Dis. (2021) 31:197. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.2.197
28. Sealy-Jefferson S, Misra DP. Neighborhood tax foreclosures, educational attainment, and preterm birth among Urban African American women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060904
29. Crear-Perry J, Correa-de-Araujo R, Lewis Johnson T, McLemore MR, Neilson E, Wallace M. Social and structural determinants of health inequities in maternal health. J Womens Health. (2021) 30:230–5. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8882
30. Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework For Action on the Social Determinants of Health (2007).
31. Phelan JC, Link BG. Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health? Annu Rev Sociol. (2015) 41:311–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112305
32. Collins CA, Williams DR. Segregation and mortality: the deadly effects of racism? Sociological Forum. (1999) 14:495–523. doi: 10.1023/A:1021403820451
33. Gelber SE, Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA. Reducing health care disparities: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 215:140–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.058
34. Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. (2017) 389:1453–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X
35. Garland D. Introduction: The Meaning of Mass Imprisonment. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (2001). doi: 10.1177/14624740122228203
36. Lee H, McCormick T, Hicken MT, Wildeman C. Racial inequalities in connectedness to imprisoned individuals in the United States. Du Bois Rev Soc Sci Res Race. (2015) 12:269–82. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X15000065
37. deVuono-Powell S, Schweidler C, Walters A, Zohrabi A. Who Pays? The True Cost of Incarceration on Families. Oakland: Ella Baker Center, Forward Together, Research Action Design (accessed August, 2015). p. 15.
38. Massoglia M, Pare P-P, Schnittker J, Gagnon A. The relationship between incarceration and premature adult mortality: gender specific evidence. Soc Sci Res. (2014) 46:142–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.03.002
39. Lee H, Wildeman C, Wang EA, Matusko N, Jackson JS. A heavy burden: the cardiovascular health consequences of having a family member incarcerated. Am J Public Health. (2014) 104:421–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301504
40. Lee H, Wildeman C. Things fall apart: Health consequences of mass imprisonment for African American women. Rev Black Polit Econ. (2013) 40:39–52. doi: 10.1007/s12114-011-9112-4
41. Wildeman C, Wang EA. Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA. Lancet. (2017) 389:1464–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30259-3
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. (2017). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html (accessed June 28, 2018).
43. Kochanek KD, Murphy S, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief . (2017) 293:1–8.
44. Fowler KA, Jack SP, Lyons BH, Betz CJ, Petrosky E. Surveillance for violent deaths—national violent death reporting system, 18 states, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2018) 67:1. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6702a1
45. Lane SD, Rubinstein RA, Bergen-Cico D, Jennings-Bey T, Fish LS, Larsen DA, et al. Neighborhood trauma due to violence: a multilevel analysis. J Health Care Poor Underserved. (2017) 28:446–62. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0033
46. Messer LC, Kaufman JS, Dole N, Herring A, Laraia BA. Violent crime exposure classification and adverse birth outcomes: a geographically-defined cohort study. Int J Health Geogr. (2006) 5:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-22
47. Mayne SL, Pool LR, Grobman WA, Kershaw KN. Associations of neighbourhood crime with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in Chicago: analysis of electronic health records from 2009 to 2013. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2018) 72:230–6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209801
48. Jenkins EJ. Black women and community violence. Women Ther. (2002) 25:29–44. doi: 10.1300/J015v25n03_03
49. Burdette AM, Hill TD. An examination of processes linking perceived neighborhood disorder and obesity. Soc Sci Med. (2008) 67:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.029
50. Steptoe A, Feldman PJ. Neighborhood problems as sources of chronic stress: development of a measure of neighborhood problems, and associations with socioeconomic status and health. Ann Behav Med. (2001) 23:177–85. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_5
51. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. J Health Soc Behav. (2001) 42:258–76. doi: 10.2307/3090214
53. Aneshensel CS, Sucoff CA. The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. J Health Soc Behav. (1996) 37:293–310. doi: 10.2307/2137258
54. Collins JW, Wambach J, David RJ, Rankin KM. Women's lifelong exposure to neighborhood poverty and low birth weight: a population-based study. Matern Child Health J. (2009) 13:326. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0354-0
55. Kiser LJ, Black MM. Family processes in the midst of urban poverty: what does the trauma literature tell us? Aggress Violent Behav. (2005) 10:715–50. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.003
56. Sealy-Jefferson S, Messer L, Slaughter-Acey J, Misra DP. Inter-relationships between objective and subjective measures of the residential environment among urban African American women. Ann Epidemiol. (2017) 27:164–8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.12.003
57. Chambers BD, Arega HA, Arabia SE, Taylor B, Barron RG, Gates B, et al. Black women's perspectives on structural racism across the reproductive lifespan: a conceptual framework for measurement development. Matern Child Health J. (2021) 25:402–13. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03074-3
58. Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Vol 1. Oakland, CA: Univ of California Press (2017).
59. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan L Rev. (1990) 43:1241. doi: 10.2307/1229039
60. Ross L. Understanding reproductive justice: transforming the pro-choice movement. Off Our Backs. (2006) 36:14–9. doi: 10.2307/20838711
61. Krieger N. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol. (2001) 30:668–77. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.4.668
62. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider? Soc Sci Med. (1994) 39:887–903. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90202-X
63. Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. (1999) 29:295–352. doi: 10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q
64. Krieger N. The science and epidemiology of racism and health: racial/ethnic categories, biological expressions of racism, and the embodiment of inequality—an ecosocial perspective. In: What's the Use of Race?: Modern Governance and the Biology of Difference. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2010). p. 225.
65. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the People's Health: Theory and Context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2011).
66. Bowleg L. Towards a critical health equity research stance: Why epistemology and methodology matter more than qualitative methods. Health Educ Behav. (2017) 44:677–84. doi: 10.1177/1090198117728760
67. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. (1998) 19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
Keywords: Black women, maternal health, mass incarceration, violent death, epidemiology, community-based participatory action research
Citation: Sealy-Jefferson S (2022) Injustices in Black Maternal Health: A Call for Different Research Questions, Orientations, and Methodologies. Front. Public Health 10:860850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.860850
Received: 23 January 2022; Accepted: 24 March 2022;
Published: 18 April 2022.
Edited by:
Melody Goodman, New York University, United StatesReviewed by:
Monica McLemore, University of California, San Francisco, United StatesMaeve Wallace, Tulane University, United States
Copyright © 2022 Sealy-Jefferson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson, c2VhbHktamVmZmVyc29uLjEmI3gwMDA0MDtvc3UuZWR1