Wei Guo
Kim Geok Soh
Noor Syamilah Zakaria3- 1Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembanga, Malaysia
- 2Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Physical Educations, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China
- 3Department of Counselor Education and Counseling Psychology, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembanga, Malaysia
- 4Department of Preclinical, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Background: Resistance training has been widely used in various sports and improves competition performance, especially in swimming. Swimming performance is highly dependent on muscle strength, especially short distances. For adolescent athletes, the existing literature has bound to prove that resistance training is undoubtedly bound to improve swimmers' performance.
Objectives: This study adopts a systematic literature review to (1) examine the effects of resistance training on the performance of adolescent swimmers, and (2) summarize their training methods and intensity.
Methods: The literature search was undertaken in five international databases: the SCOUPS, PubMed, EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus), CNKL, Web of Science. The searches covered documents in English and Chinese published until 30th December 2020. Electronic databases using various keywords related to “strength training” and “adolescent swimmers” were searched. Sixteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria where the data was then systematically reviewed using the PRISMA guideline. Furthermore, the physical therapy evidence database (PEDro) scale was used to measure each study's scientific rigor.
Results: This review found that to improve the swimming performance of adolescents, two types of resistance training were used, specifically in water and on land, where both types of training can improve swimming performance. In addition, training with two types of resistance machines were better in the water than with one equipment. Resistance training can improve the swimming performance of adolescent swimmers at 50 m, 100 m, 200 m and 400 m distances. However, most studies only focused on the swimming performance at 50 m and 100 m lengths. A low-intensity, high-speed resistance training programme is recommended for adolescent swimmers to obtain the best training results.
Conclusion: Water or land resistance training can improve the swimming performance. Given that both types of exercises have their strengths and weaknesses, combining these methods may enhance the swimmers' performance. In addition, despite the starting and turning phases consuming up to one-third of the total swimming time for short distances, literature in this area is limited.
Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42021231510.
Introduction
Swimming differs from other sports as it requires a particular environment involving water. Swimming is a systemic exercise that necessitates the coordination of the upper and lower limbs to ensure that the body performs its best in water (1). Building their support platform in water is, hence, essential among swimmers. The core to a solid and stable swimming movement is connecting the upper and lower limb movements in water while producing a stable support foundation (2, 3). Studies have found that swimming speed is the product of stroke rate and stroke length, where increasing either one of these would improve a swimmer's performance (4–6). It has also been suggested that improving swimming speed requires high frequency, duration and intensity, where a high total training volume may be expected (7).
Resistance training is defined as the ability of a given muscle, or group of muscles, to generate muscle strength under specific conditions (8, 9). Furthermore, resistance training has been found to increase the maximum muscle strength, thereby increasing the speed of strength development (10). It is generally believed that swimming performance is highly dependent on the muscle strength (11–15). The purpose of resistance training is to overload the muscles used in swimming and increase the maximum strength output. Resistance training has many physiological benefits including increased phosphate stores, contractile proteins, anaerobic power output, muscle structure, fiber bundles, protein synthesis, tissue remodeling and fast-twitch muscle fiber hypertrophy (16–19).
Furthermore, swimming performance is highly dependent on muscle strength (11, 20–22). The ability to exert force in water is the decisive factor, especially for short distances (23, 24) as many studies have described the importance of muscle strength of arms and legs and its generated force in swimming performance (25, 26). As compared to traditional resistance training (e.g. barbells, dumbbells, pull-ups, leapfrogs), elastic bands, Swiss balls, drag parachutes and resistance gloves are currently more commonly used to build strength. Research has shown that resistance training in either water or land is superior to traditional strength training (27–31). Where muscle strength is considered the primary determinant of competitive swimming success (32). In order to move freely in water, swimmers are required to overcome these resistance by continuously improving their strength (33).
Youth sports coaches tend to implement structured training methods based on college or professional models for adult athletes (34). This is due to the assumption that these methods would be similarly effective and applicable among adolescent athletes. However, the intensive training model among adults usually include year-round arrangements, professional training and daily physical exertion. Given that physical recovery during intense training is limited regardless of age and development (35, 36), most studies have shown that the response of prepubertal children to training is similar to that of mature athletes, but with a different degree (37–40). Hence, while resistance training can be used with adolescents, it should be conducted at a smaller intensity.
The present study is to specify a set of descriptions of swimming training methods, intensity, number of groups, repetitions or practice times for teenagers suitable for different research objects. Some studies have prescribed a set of suitable training methods for their subjects. The purpose of this paper is to find the law of resistance training for teenagers and sum up a set of principles and methods suitable for all teenagers swimming training. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic literature review is to (1) examine the effect of resistance training on the performance of adolescent swimmers and (2) summarize the training methods and intensity of adolescent swimmers.
Methods
Literature Search Strategy
The literature search was undertaken in five international databases: the SCOUPS, PubMed, EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus), CNKL, Web of Science. The searches covered documents in English and Chinese published until 30th December 2020. Only articles in journals were accepted. The following electronic sources were searched: Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The key terms used were: (“weight exercise” OR “strength training” OR “strength exercise” OR “weight training”) AND (“adolescent swimmer” OR “juvenile swimmer” OR “teenager swimmer” OR “youth swimmer” OR “young swimmer” OR “junior swimmer” OR “children swimmer”). In addition, age (children and adolescents of 6–20 years in age) was used as the limiter.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Used the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study designs) criteria as the inclusion criteria, is presented in Table 1. Only records presenting resistance training on aspect of performance of adolescent swimmer were included. Thus, studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) A full text, peer-reviewed study published in English, describing the use of athletes (male and female) to explore the effects of resistance training interventions on swimming performance., randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-randomized controlled trial (Non-RCT) with two or more groups, and single-group trials with pretest and post-test design; (2) In this study, only included studies on planned and organized resistance training intervention to improve swimming performance; (3) Investigate the effects of resistance training on swimming performance athletes and assess at least one swimming performance, component outcome; (4) There were no restrictions on the sample size, study location, and intervention time for the included studies.
Table 1. Inclusion criteria according to the PICOS conditions.
The inclusion criteria were (1) swimming performance as an outcome measure, (2) swimmers had undergone structured swimming training programmes, and (3) participants were 20 years old and below. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were (1) untrained, novice, masters, and paraplegic swimmers, (2) triathlon and water polo athletes, and (3) injured swimmers.
Study Selection
This study used projects for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct this systematic review (41). The retrieval process, as shown in Figure 1, included an evaluation hierarchy that evaluated studies first by journal title, second by abstract, and third by full-text review where journal articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. An initial search yielded 439 published papers and after deletion of duplicates, 320 papers remained. In total 264 papers were further excluded as they were published in different disciplines while another 20 papers were deleted as the full text was unavailable. The remaining 33 papers were on the influence of resistance training on adolescent swimming performance. In total 17 papers were further excluded as they were neither in English nor Chinese, non-experimental studies, did not have a control group and included water polo, disability and triathlon athletes. As a result, 16 papers were included in this systematic review.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the study selection process.
Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
After the data search was complete, data were obtained from eligible studies in a predetermined extraction form [Including, (1) Author, title, publication year; (2) Research design; (3) Sample size, control group; (4) Participant characteristics (age, gender,etc.); (5) Intervention features (type, length, and frequency); (6) Measures index; and (7) Research outcomes]. One author abstracted information into the standard form and the other author checked it.
The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was subsequently used to assess the quality of the final 16 records (15, 33, 42–55). The PEDro scale was used to score the literature quality based on 15 items related to scientific rigor, which includes eligibility criteria, random allocation strategy, type of intervention, main exercises, training arrangements, test items, inter-group analysis, and results (56). If the study meets the criteria, the scale is scored with 1 point, but zero points were awarded if a criterion is not met. Research with a score of either 9 or 10 on the PEDro scale is considered methodologically excellent while a score of between 6 and 8 is good. Research with a 4 or 5 score is considered average, with scores lower than 4 suggesting that the research was methodologically poor. The authors rated all studies based on this scale as reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Population, study design and PEDro scale.
Results
Participant Characteristics
Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the participants from the 16 papers who meet the criteria for inclusion in this review. In total 338 participants, of which 224 were males and 91 were females, were collected where participants had an age range of between 11 and 20 years old (15, 33, 42–55). The pre-test difference between the control and experimental groups was minimal, in which 15 studies involved swimmers who were trained for national or international competitions (15, 33, 42–54). One study, however, did not mention the swimming capabilities of the athletes (55).
Study Design and PEDro Score
The research design and PEDro scores were also summarized in Table 2. In total 10 studies reported an intervention duration of 8 to 12 weeks (15, 33, 43, 45, 48, 51–55) with the longest duration reported at 24 weeks (44) There were 14 studies that used randomization (15, 33, 42, 43, 45) in their design while the remaining 2 studies did not randomly assign the participants into intervention conditions (44, 47). The PEDro scores for all studies were 4 (55), 5 (50–54) and 6 (15, 33, 42–49). All studies were deducted points for items related to blindness in participants, therapists, and evaluators. The differences in scores were mainly based on whether the study involved random assignment.
Resistance Training and Strength Training
Through these 16 papers, it was found that some articles adopted the term “resistance training” while others used the term “strength training.” Resistance training emphasized the way that muscle tissues resisted force, generally including combined equipment, free-weight training and self-weight training. The equipment necessary were: isokinetic dynamometer, Swiss ball, solid ball, bungee rope, drag parachute and drag hand webs (15, 33, 42, 43, 48–53, 55). The other articles used “strength training” that highlighted the purpose of training, which is to increase muscle strength. The equipment required include resistance parachute, elastic rope, resistance suit, isokinetic dynamometer, barbell and dumbbells (44, 45, 47, 54). While there were no noticeable differences in concept and training equipment for these terms, their primary focuses were different.
Training Programmes
Table 2 summarizes training types, content, arrangements and test items related to strength training intervention and training used by swimmers during the study period. Resistance training was mainly divided into water resistance training (42, 43, 48–53, 55) and land resistance training (15, 33, 44–47, 54). Water training mainly included resistance parachutes, gloves, tie ropes and resistance clothes, whereas land training comprised of rubber bands, Swiss balls, solid balls, sit-ups, dumbbells, push-ups, and large resistance equipment. However, the resistance training was mainly at low intensities, and the outcome measures were primarily either through freestyle or short distances. All research used only one type of resistance training, which were found to be superior to traditional strength training. Interestingly, none of the studies examined the effect of water resistance training in combination with land resistance training on swimming performance (15, 33, 42–55).
The intensity of training was also summarized in Table 2. Six articles showed the strength of movement in percentage, with the passion ranging from 30–40% 1RM (47) to 80–90% 1RM (15), while the intensity of other training programmes ranged from 50–80% 1RM (50, 52–54). The training intensity did not reach 100% 1RM. Resistance training in water had a specific resistance, covered a short swimming distance of 20–30m (48, 49, 51) and lasted less than 30 seconds (42, 43). Therefore, these resistance training were low-intensity and high-speed. Each resistance training conducted on land was performed more than 30 times (33, 45, 46) and only low-intensity resistance was possible with more repetitions and faster natural speed.
Strength Outcomes
In the 16 studies in Table 3, the improvement in swimming performance were significant in both water and land resistance training (15, 33, 42, 45, 46, 48–54). One study showed that muscle strength and swimming performance were highly correlated (44). Another study demonstrated that two types of water resistance training were more effective in improving swimming performance than one type of training (55). In addition, research showed that water resistance training improved swimmers' performance more than traditional land strength training, but land resistance training was more effective than conventional land strength training. Furthermore, strength training on land also improved the performance of swimmers. With the swimming performance of adolescents improving especially at 50 m and 100 m distances, programme should use the low-intensity, high-speed force approach to engender results among youths (15, 42, 45–48, 51, 52, 54, 55).
Table 3. Group, main outcomes and participant characteristics.
Discussion
This systematic review aimed to examine the influence of resistance training on the performance of adolescent swimmers and summarize resistance training methods for these swimmers. According to the data collected, resistance training can directly impact performance with proper training being beneficial to adolescent growth and development. Appropriate resistance training can help increase muscle strength, promote body growth and prevent injuries (57). To achieve the best training effect in adolescent swimmers, a low-intensity, high-speed force resistance training programme is recommended for optimal training results. However, there were inconsistencies in the literature, which can be attributed to differences in methodology and participant demographics; hence, practitioners should apply the recommendation in this study to their athletes with caution. The most significant concern with resistance training in children and adolescents was the risk of injury due to the excessive use of soft tissues, especially for the lower back, back and shoulders (58). If a resistance exercise programme was designed to exceed a child's capacity, the pleasure in exercising may be diminished through the increase of acute or overtraining injuries (59). Moreover, although the PEDro scores were moderate (i.e. 4, 5 or 6), the quality of the work reviewed in this article were generally acceptable considering the inevitable restrictions imposed by training intervention studies related to blindness.
Dry-Land Resistance Training Modalities
Some studies confirmed that dry-land strength training can improve swimming performance (15, 33, 44–47, 54). Therefore, widespread dry-land strength training procedures were reported by swimming athletes to improve performance in competitions. In addition, studies showed the auxiliary effect of kicking in improving swimming speed (60–62). In general, dry-land resistance training includes two types of strength training which were basic and special. Basic strength training comprised of (1) bench press barbell, which was to develop the maximum muscle strength of the pectoralis major, triceps and forearm muscles, (2) dumbbell exercise to develop the strength of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi, and (3) Swiss ball and medicine ball to build local muscles. The Swiss ball can improve the control ability of the whole body muscles, help to develop stability and maintain a good body posture during swimming (33, 44, 45). The techniques for special strength training included isokinetic tension, pulley tension and isokinetic dynamometer. The isokinetic pulling force is divided into three positions: prone, supine and standing. This exercise mirrors one's posture in water, introduces force on one or both arms and imitates the movement and resistance in water to a great extent (15, 33, 44–46, 54).
Underwater Resistance Training Modalities
Some studies confirmed that underwater resistance training can improve swimming performance (42, 43, 48–53, 55). “Underwater” Resistant Sprint Swimming Training (RST) was developed to increase the possibility of effective transfer of mature swimmers (14, 28, 63). Generally, water resistance training included the usage of a variety of equipment to increase the swimming resistance of athletes, namely (1) power frame, (2) rubber tension, (3) Increase water resistance, elastic rope, and (4) parachutes, gloves and resistance clothes (49, 51, 55). Power frame is a traditional method used to improve swimming intensity (52). On the other hand, rubber tension involves tying the two ends to the waists of each athlete during two-person resistance training Another variation of rubber tension involves one end of the rubber tension being tied to the waist of two athletes, while the other end being tied to the athlete on the pool wall (42, 43). Furthermore, with an elastic rope, one end is connected to a load cell while the other end is connected to the swimmer's waist (48, 50, 55).
Swimming Performance
Table 2 summarized the main outcomes of the 16 studies selected. Multiple studies found that adolescent swimmers who underwent dry-land resistance training (15, 33, 43, 45, 46, 52) and water-resistance training (15, 42, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54) reported significant improvements in their swimming performance as compared to traditional swimming training. The swimming performances studied in most studies were mainly freestyle, specifically 50 m freestyle (15, 42, 45–52, 54), 100 m freestyle (33, 48, 51, 53–55), 200 m freestyle (48, 51, 53), and 400 m freestyle (42, 53). Other strokes that were measured as swimming performance were 100 m breaststroke (33), 100 m backstroke (33), and 100 m butterfly (33, 46). One study, however, found that resistance training showed little change in bilateral muscle strength and F/E peak torque ratio of the knee (44). Moreover, competitive swimming races consist of four different segments: start, clean, turn and finish (64, 65). As the race distance becomes longer (e.g. from 50 m to 1,500 m), different phases during the swim had different contributions to the final race time. For example, in short 100 m events, the start and turn accounted for nearly one-third of the final race time (66). Therefore, these phases are crucial for the impact of swimming performance. More concerning is the limited studies that have investigated the effect of resistance training specifically on the start and turn skills of adolescent swimmers especially for a 50 m event.
Limitations
Overall, this review provides substantial evidence of considerable quality and the beneficial effects of different resistance training programs on swimming performance. However, this review has several limitations. However, there are several limitations to this review. First, most of the studies involved unequal numbers of male or female, either only male or only female. If present, it could be important because there are differences in assessing swimming performance based on sex, which could affect the final study results. Second, none of the studies in this review stated sample size calculation methods. Determining the sample size is influenced by several factors, including the purpose of the study, the size of the population, the risk of selecting the sample, and the allowable sampling error. Therefore, inappropriate, insufficient, or excessive sample size can affect quality and accuracy. Errors in the calculation of sample size in included studies may affect study results. Third, most studies did not record or control for the exercises that participants performed outside of the research setting. Therefore, it is difficult to predict the effect of resistance on swimming performance of athletes.
Conclusion and Future Research
Maglischo's theory of resistance training in swimming posited that there are two types of resistance training that can improve swimming performance, which are training conducted in water and on land (1). Existing literature also showed that underwater resistance training (42, 43, 48–53, 55) and terrestrial resistance training (15, 33, 44–47, 54) can improve the swimming performance of adolescents. At present, no study on the effects of combined land and water resistance training on swimming performance has been reported. Furthermore, while the improvements in the overall performance of teenage swimmers undergoing resistance training were noticeable, no research detailing the impact of specific techniques on performance were conducted.
This review is the most comprehensive review to date relating to the effects of resistance training on the performance of young swimmers. Numerous studies found that resistance training can improve swimming performance in response to all resistance training programmes. Based on this review, the strength training programme recommended for young swimmers is a low-intensity, high-speed programme. Furthermore, resistance training interventions were mainly short distances of between 50–100 meters. Future research may consider investigating the effects of resistance training on adolescents' start and turn skills. In addition, the impact of combining land and water resistance training on teenage swimmers warrants further study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.
Author Contributions
KS and WG contributed to the design, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of the data for the systematic review, drafted the work, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the version to be published, and agreed to be account-able for all aspects of the work ensuring that the questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The review was registered with PROSPERO (Effect of Resistance Training Methods and Intensity on the Adolescent Swimmers Performance: A Systematic Review—CRD42021231510) at the University of York, United Kingdom.
References
1. Maglischo E, Maglischo C, Zier D, Santos D. The effects of sprint-assisted and sprint-resisted swimming on stroke mechanics. J Swim Res. (1985) 1:27–33.
2. Morrison L, Peyrebrune M, Folland J. Resisted-swimming training improves 100 m freestyle performance in elite swimmers. J Sport Sci. (2005) 23:1149–303.
3. Maszczyk A, Gołaś A, Pietraszewski P, Kowalczyk M, Cieszczyk P, Kochanowicz A, et al. Neurofeedback for the enhancement of dynamic balance of judokas. J Biol Sport. (2018) 35:99–102. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2018.71488
4. Wakayoshi K, D'Acquisto J, Cappaert J, Troup JP. Relationship between metabolic parameters and stroking technique characteristics in front crawl. In: Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strasse D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA, editors. Biomechanics and medicine in swimming VII. London: Taylor & Francis. (1996). p. 152–8.
5. Girold S, Calmels P, Maurin D, Milhau N, Chatard JC. Assisted and resisted sprint training in swimming. J Strength Cond Res. (2006) 20:547–54. doi: 10.1519/00124278-200608000-00015
6. Wakayoshi K, D'Acquisto L, Cappaert J, Troup JP. Relationship between oxygen uptake, stroke rate and swimming velocity in competitive swimming. J Sports Med. (1995) 16:19–23. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972957
7. González-Boto R, Salguero A, Tuero C, González-Gallego J, Márquez S. Monitoring the effects of training load changes on stress and recovery in swimmers. J Physiol Biochem. (2008) 64:19–26. doi: 10.1007/BF03168231
8. Maszczyka A, Gołaśa A, Pietraszewskia P, Rocznioka R, Zajaca A, Stanulaa A. Application of neural and regression models in sports results prediction. J Procedia - Soci Behavio Sci. (2014) 117:482–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.249
10. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. J Sports Med. (2016) 46:1–31. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0
11. Sharp RL, Troup JP, Costill DL. Relationship between power and sprint freestyle swimming. J Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1981) 14:53–6. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198201000-00010
12. Costill D, Rayfield F, Kirwan J, Thomas R. A computer based system for the measurement of force and power during front crawl swimming. J Swim Res. (1986) 2:16–9.
13. Tanaka H, Costill DL, Thomas R, Fink WJ, Widrick JJ. Dry-land resistance training for competitive swimming. J Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1993) 25:952–9. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199308000-00011
14. Tanaka H, Swensen T. Impact of resistance training on endurance performance. J Sports Med. (1998) 25:191–200. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199825030-00005
15. Girold S, Maurin D, Dugue' B, Hatard CC, Emillet G. Effects of dry-land vs resisted-and assisted-sprint exercises on swimming sprint performances. J Strength Cond Res. (2007) 21:599–605. doi: 10.1519/00124278-200705000-00054
16. Saltin B, Gollnick P. Skeletal muscle adaptability: significance for metabolism and performance. In: Peachey LD, Adrain RH, Geiger SR, editors. Handbook of Physiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. (1983). p. 555–631. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp100119
17. Newton RU, Cormie P, Cardinale M. Principles of athletic training. In: Cardinale M, Newton R, Nosaka K, editors. Strength and conditioning: biological principles and practical applications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (2011). p. 255–70.
18. Haff GG, Nimphius S. Training principles for power. J Strength Cond Res. (2012) 34:2–12. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e31826db467
19. Goodwin JE, Cleather DJ. The biomechanical principles underpinning strength and conditioning. In: Jefferys I, Moody J, editors. Strength and conditioning for sports performance. Oxon: Routledge. (2016). p. 62–5.
20. Barbosa TM, Morais JE, Marques MC, Costa MJ, Marinho DA. The power output and sprinting performance of young swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. (2015) 29:440–50. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000626
21. Keskinen KL, Tilli LJ, Komi PV. Maximum velocity swimming: interrelationships of stroking characteristics, force production and anthropometric variables. J Sporen, KL, Tts Sci. (1989) 11:87–92.
22. Newton RU, Jones J, Kraemer WJ, Wardle H. Strength and power training of Australian Olympic Swimmers. J Strength Cond. (2002) 24:7–15. doi: 10.1519/00126548-200206000-00001
23. Morouço P, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Relationship between tethered forces and the four swimming techniques performance. J Appl Biomech. (2011) 27:161–9. doi: 10.1123/jab.27.2.161
24. Stager JM, Coyle MA. Energy systems. In: Swimming—Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Stager J, Tanner D, eds. Boston. MA: Blackwell Science. (2005). p. 1–19. doi: 10.1002/9780470698761
25. Shuji S, Masahiro T, Mochiyoshi M. Effect of a swimming power, swimming power endurance and dry-land power on 100m freestyle performance. In: Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX. Saint-Etienne: University of Saint Etienn. (2003). p. 391–6.
26. Smirniotou A, Katsikas C, Paradisis G, Argeitaki P, Zacharogiannis E, Tziortzis S. Strength-power parameters as predictors of sprinting performance. J Sports Med Phys Fit. (2008) 48:447–54.
27. Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Saekmose A, Jorgensen P, Jorgensen K, Klausen K. Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scand J Med Sci Sport. (2002) 12:171–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.01128.x
28. Aspenes ST, Karlsen T. Exercise-training intervention studies in competitive swimming. J Sports Med. (2012) 42:527–43. doi: 10.2165/11630760-000000000-00000
29. Morouco PG, Marinho DA, Amaro NM, Peréz-Turpin JA, Marques M. Effects of dry-land strength training on swimming performance: a brief review. J Hum Sport Exerc. (2012) 7:553–9. doi: 10.4100/jhse.2012.72.18
30. Aspenes S, Kjendlie P-L, Hoff J, Helgerud J. Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers. J Sport Sci Med. (2009) 8:357–65.
31. Garrido N, Marinho DA, Reis VM, Tillaar R, Tillaar R, Costa AM, et al. Does combined dry land strength and aerobic training inhibit performance of young competitive swimmers. J Sport Sci Med. (2010) 9:300–10.
32. Trappe SW, Pearson DR. Effects of weight assisted dry-land strength training on swimming performance. J Strength Cond Res. (1994) 8:209–13. doi: 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00001
33. Zhao J. Resistance training at the age of 1 1- 1 2 male child swimming member onshore training applied research. J Shanghai Sports Univ. (2017) 30:99–103. Avilable online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201702&filename=1017168061.nh&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=SFAZ1fYejoQiae1NVBhjS3Ac9zsj41T5rizRpNdh1xxekuQ8wfvEN9U8K6FU_UU4
34. Behringer M. vom Heede A, Yue Z, Mester J. Effects of resistance training in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Pediatrics. (2010) 126:e1199–210. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0445
35. Harries SK, Lubans DR, Callister R. Resistance training to improve power and sports performance in adolescent athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. (2012) 15:532–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.005
36. Hoff J, Gran A, Helgerud J. Maximal strength training improves aerobic endurance performance. J Sports Sci. (2002) 1:288–95. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.01140.x
37. Keskinen KL, Tilli LJ, Komi PV. Maximum velocity swimming: Interrelationships of stroking characteristics, force production and anthropometric variables. Scand J Sports Sci. (1989) 11:87–92.
38. Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. (2004) doi: 10.5040/9781492596837
39. McGibbon KE, Pyne DB, Shephard ME, Thompson KG. Pacing in swimming: a systematic review. J Sports Medicine. (2018) 48:1621–33. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0901-9
40. Menting SP, Elferink-Gemser MT, Huijgen BC, Hetting FJ. Pacing in lane-based head-to-head competitions: a systematic review on swimming. J Sports Sci. (2019) 37:2287–99. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1627989
41. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Bri Med. (2009) 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
42. Huang XF. Experimental study on resistance training method of two swimmers in water. J Beijing Sports Univ. (2009) 32:109–13. doi: 10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8
43. Batalha N, Dias S, Marinho DA, Parraca J. The effectiveness of land and water based resistance training on shoulder rotator cuff strength and balance of youth swimmers. J Human Kinet. (2018) 161:91–102. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0161
44. Dalamitros AA, Manou V, Christoulas K, Kellis S. The effectiveness of land and water based resistance training on shoulder rotator cuff strength and balance of youth swimmers. J Human Kinet. (2015) 121:195–200. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0121
45. Amaro NM, Marinho DA, Marques MC, Batalha NP, Morouc PG. Effects of dry-land strength and conditioning programs in age group swimmers. J Strength Condit Res. (2017) 31:2447–54. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001709
46. Naczk M, Lopacinski A, Owczarzak WB, Arlet J, Naczk A, Adach Z. Influence of short-term inertial training on swimming performance in young swimmers. Eur J Sport Sci. (2016) 17:369–77. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1241304
47. Marques MC, García JMY, Marinho DA, Badillo JJG, Rosell DR. In-season strength training in elite junior swimmers: the role of the low-volume, high-velocity training on swimming performance. J Human Kinet. (2020) 74:71–84. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0015
48. Toussaint AL, Vervoorn K. Effects of specific high resistance training in the water on competitive swimmers. J Sports Mcd. (1990) 11:228–33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024797
49. Dragunas AJ, Dickey JP, Nolte VW. The effect of drag suit training on 50-M freestyle performance. J Nation Strength Condit Assoc. (2012) 26:989–94. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822d5404
50. Ravé JMG, Legaz-Arrese A, González-Mohíno F, Yustres I, Barragán R, Fernández FA, et al. The effects of two different resisted swim training load protocols on swimming strength and performance. J Human Kinet. (2018) 194:195–204. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0194
51. Gourgoulis V, Valkoumas I, Boli A, Aggeloussis N, Antoniou P. Effect of an 11 week in-water training program with increased resistance on the swimming performance and the basic kinematic characteristics of the front crawl stroke. J Strength Condit Res. (2017) 33:95–103. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001879
52. Kojima K, Brammer CL, Sossong TD. In-water resisted swim training for age-group swimmers: an evaluation of training effects. J Pediatric Exerc Sci. (2018) 30:126–33. doi: 10.1123/pes.2016-0230
53. Papoti M, Silva ASR, Kalva-Filho CA, Araujo GG, Santiago V, Barreto LE, et al. Tethered swimming for the evaluation and prescription of -resistance training in young swimmers. J Sports Med. (2017) 38:125–33. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105017
54. Keiner M, Yaghobi D, Sander A, Wirth K, Hartmann H. The in?uence of maximal strength performance of upper and lower extremities and trunk muscles on different sprint swim performances in adolescent swimmers. J Sci sports. (2015) 6:147–54. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2015.05.001
55. Salman TM, Ameen NM, Al-Jubour MH. The effect of the use of parachutes and gloves in some kinetic variables and the completion of a swimming pool (50M) free for the armenian club. Indian J Public Health Res. (2019) 10:2622–7. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.03261.3
56. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. J Phys Ther. (2003) 83:713–21. doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
57. Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing Resistance Training Programs. Champing, IL Human Kinetic. (1993). p. 89–95.
58. Risser WL, Risser JM. Weight training injuries in adolescents. Am J Dis Child. (1990) 144:1015–7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150330075025
59. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR, Jeffreys I, Micheli LJ, Nitka M, et al. Youth resistance training. Presid Coun Phys Fitn Sports Res Digest. (2003) 4:1–8. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26684601
60. Hollander AP, De Groot G, Van Ingen Schenau GJ, Kahman R, Toussaint HM. Contribution of the legs to propulsion in swimming. In: Ungerechts BE, Wilkie K, Reischle K, editors. Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers. (1988). p. 39–43.
61. Deschodt VJ, Arsac LM, Rouard AH. Relative contribution of arms and legs in human to propulsion in 25 m sprint front crawl swimming. J Appl Physiol. (1999) 80:192–99. doi: 10.1007/s004210050581
62. Gourgoulis V, Boli A, Aggeloussis N, Toubekis A, Antoniou P, Kasimatis P, et al. The effect of leg kick on sprint front crawl performance. J Sports Sci. (2014) 32:278–89. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.823224
63. Hopper RT, Hadley C, Piva M, Bambauer B. Measurement of power delivered to an external weight. In: Hollander AP, Huijing PA, de Groot G, editors. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. (1983). p. 113–9.
64. Smith DJ, Norris SR, Hogg JM. Performance evaluation of swimmers: scientific tools. J Sports Medicine. (2002) 32:539–54. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232090-00001
65. Veiga S, Cala A, Mallo J, Navarro E. A new procedure for race analysis in swimming based on individual distance measurements. J Sports Sci. (2013) 31:159–65. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.723130
Keywords: physical activity, speed, combination, distance, strength
Citation: Guo W, Soh KG, Zakaria NS, Hidayat Baharuldin MT and Gao Y (2022) Effect of Resistance Training Methods and Intensity on the Adolescent Swimmer's Performance: A Systematic Review. Front. Public Health 10:840490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.840490
Received: 21 December 2021; Accepted: 07 February 2022;
Published: 04 April 2022.
Edited by:
Pedro Morouço, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, PortugalReviewed by:
Pedro Forte, Douro Higher Institute of Educational Sciences, PortugalAthanasios A. Dalamitros, Aristotle University, Greece
Flávio De Souza Castro, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Alfonso Trinidad Morales, European University of Madrid, Spain
Copyright © 2022 Guo, Soh, Zakaria, Hidayat Baharuldin and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kim Geok Soh, a2ltcyYjeDAwMDQwO3VwbS5lZHUubXk=