Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 08 December 2022
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic Health Literacy and Disease Prevention, Volume II View all 23 articles

At-home disposal practices of used insulin needles among patients with diabetes in China: A single-center, cross-sectional study

\nHaixia Tu
Haixia Tu1*Xueqin LuXueqin Lu2Jialu WangJialu Wang1Zhiqiong ShengZhiqiong Sheng1Danman LiuDanman Liu2Jufang Li
Jufang Li1*Caixia Sun
Caixia Sun3*Zhiqin Yin
Zhiqin Yin1*
  • 1School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
  • 2Endocrinology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • 3Nursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Background: Most insulin injections for people with diabetes are administered at home, thus generating many used needles. Unsafe disposal of these at-home needles can lead to needle stick injuries, blood-borne disease transmission, and environmental contamination. Previous studies have shown varying results on the prevalence of and factors associated with safe sharps disposal practices of people with diabetes.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of and the factors associated with the safe disposal of used insulin needles among patients with diabetes.

Methods: We collected data from 271 insulin-using patients at a tertiary care hospital in China. A self-designed instrument was used to assess sociodemographic data, disease- and treatment-related characteristics, sharps disposal practices, education on diabetes self-management and sharps disposal, and awareness of the potential risks associated with unsafe sharps disposal. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore factors associated with safe sharps disposal practices.

Results: Only 10.3% (28/271) of participants disposed of used at-home insulin needles in a safe manner, and 14.8% (45/271) of participants had received previous instruction on sharps disposal. Previous sharps disposal instruction (AOR = 4.143, 95% CI = 1.642–10.450) and awareness of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission (AOR = 3.064, 95% CI = 1.332–7.046) were associated with safe disposal of used insulin needles.

Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of safe sharps disposal practices was low, and a minority of respondents had received previous instruction on sharps disposal. Participants who had previously received instruction and were aware of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission were more likely to handle sharps safely. Our study findings suggest that health care professionals should pay attention to sharps disposal practices of patients with diabetes and conduct diabetes education programs that include information on safe sharps disposal methods and potential hazards of unsafe sharps disposal.

Introduction

In 2021, the number of people with diabetes worldwide was estimated to be 537 million (1). Diabetes can cause a variety of complications that lead to stroke, kidney failure, blindness, and lower limb amputation, resulting in reduced quality of life and increased healthcare costs for patients. Moreover, in 2021, an estimated 6.7 million adult deaths were due to diabetes or its complications (1). Therefore, the prevention and control of diabetes is a global public health priority.

In 2021, China had ~141 million people with diabetes, the largest diabetic population in the world; furthermore, by 2045, China is expected to have 175 million patients with diabetes (1). China has made many efforts to manage diabetes (2, 3); however, the continued increase in the number of people with diabetes still poses a significant challenge.

Insulin injections are an important means to control blood glucose and reduce the risk of diabetic complications (4, 5). In a previous study, the number of patients with diabetes using insulin in China was ~9 million (6). Most of these insulin injections are administered at home, thus generating many medical sharps, such as used needles, in the community.

Used needles are classified as infectious and injurious waste. Under no circumstances should these sharps be disposed of in public trash cans or through public waste disposal systems (7). However, China's current regulations for medical waste disposal apply only to medical institutions, not to households or communities (8). Previous studies reported that many patients with diabetes discarded used insulin needles in their household garbage (911). Such unsafe disposal can lead to needle stick injuries, blood-borne disease transmission, and environmental contamination. Therefore, there is an urgent need to correct the unsafe handling of medical sharps among people with diabetes in the home environment.

Several factors have been associated with at-home sharps disposal practices of people with diabetes. Previous studies have shown that patients with diabetes who had received education on safe sharps disposal were more likely to safely dispose of at-home sharps than those who had not (1215). In addition, several studies showed that such education helps improve sharps disposal practices among community-based patients with diabetes (1619). Additionally, two studies indicated that patients with higher levels of education were more aware of the dangers associated with sharps and the need for safe sharps disposal (20, 21). A study conducted in the United States showed that patients who had diabetes for more than 30 years had the lowest rates of proper sharps disposal (13). Another study indicated that patients who handled needles unsafely had diabetes longer than those who handled sharps safely (22). Moreover, a study in the Philippines revealed that patients with diabetes who had been on insulin for a longer period were less likely to dispose of sharps correctly than those who had been on insulin for a shorter period (23). Another study showed that sharps disposal practices were worse in patients with diabetes who had been receiving insulin for more than a year than those who had been receiving it for less than a year (12). In addition, participants who were aware of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission via used needles were less likely to dispose of sharps in their household trash (24).

Understanding the current disposal practices for at-home insulin needles among patients with diabetes and identifying the factors associated with safe sharps disposal are essential for tailoring interventions to improve such practices in China. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (a) assess the prevalence of safe disposal of used insulin needles and (b) explore the factors associated with safe sharps disposal practices within our study group.

Methods and measurement

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study using convenience sampling to explore the prevalence of and factors associated with the safe disposal of used insulin needles among Chinese patients with diabetes.

Participants

We conducted our study from December 2021 to May 2022 in the endocrinology ward of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, a tertiary care hospital in Wenzhou. During the investigation period, patients with diabetes admitted to the ward were invited to participate in our study. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: diabetes mellitus diagnosis, age ≥18 years, insulin use for at least 6 months prior to the survey, insulin injected by the patient himself, and ability to communicate with the investigator. Patients using insulin pumps or diagnosed with gestational diabetes were excluded. Informed consent was obtained, and participation was voluntary. The required sample size was determined based on the following single population proportion formula: n=Zα/22P(1-P)δ2. Additionally, it was based on the following assumptions: an estimated 18.8% prevalence of safe disposal of used insulin needles (9), a critical value of 95% confidence interval, a 5% margin of error, and a response invalidity rate of 10%. The required sample size was calculated to be 261 and 271 participants ultimately provided valid responses to our survey.

Survey instrument

For our study, sharps was defined as used insulin needles. Furthermore, safe sharps disposal was defined as discarding used insulin needles in designated sharps or puncture-resistant containers; other sharps disposal methods were categorized as unsafe.

After reviewing the literature, we listed possible factors associated with safe sharps disposal and subsequently developed a five-part tool to collect data based on these factors. The first part collected the following sociodemographic data: age, gender, education, marital status, and presence of children under 14 years of age in the household. Second, we surveyed the following disease and treatment characteristics: duration of diabetes diagnosis, duration of insulin use, schedule of daily insulin injections, needle reuse, and needle stick injuries experienced by the patient or family members. The third part evaluated the participants' disposal method of used needles; in addition, participants with safe sharps disposal practices were required to report how they eventually disposed of containers filled with used needles. Fourth, we assessed whether or not participants had received education on diabetes self-management and sharps disposal. Those who had previously received instruction on sharps disposal were also asked about the source and their primary means of obtaining it; moreover, all participants were asked about their favorite means of obtaining information on sharps disposal. Finally, the fifth part of our survey asked three questions to assess participants' awareness of the potential hazards of unsafe sharps disposal, including needle stick injuries, blood-borne pathogen transmission, and environmental contamination.

We invited five diabetes experts, including two physicians, two advanced practice nurses, and a diabetes educator, to review our original survey instrument. Based on the experts' recommendations, statements that did not match the conventions of expression were modified. The survey instrument was pilot tested in 30 people with diabetes and was appropriate for our study.

Data collection

Our investigators obtained a list of patients with diabetes receiving insulin injections through the head nurse of the ward and subsequently interviewed these patients. Prior to the interview, investigators received training on the purpose and content of the study as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the sample. Additionally, participants were informed of the purpose and content of the study, and verbal consent was obtained prior to the survey. The investigator first asked the patients whether they had been injecting insulin for 6 months and whether they self-injected; if either question received a “no,” the interview ended. Next, the investigators asked the remaining questions one by one and recorded the participants' verbal responses.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Clinical Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (IRB No. KY2021-180).

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The variable of age did not follow a normal distribution and was expressed as medians and quartiles (P25, P75). Categorical variables were represented as cases (n) and percentages (%). In our univariate and multivariate analyses, the dependent variable was defined as whether used insulin needles were disposed of safely, i.e., whether they were placed in a designated sharps or puncture-resistant container. Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests were used for univariate analysis for skewed continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Variables with a significance of p < 0.20 were included in multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors influencing safe sharps disposal practices, with the significance level set at p < 0.05. Variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to check for multicollinearity, and variables with VIF of <5 were included in the multivariate model. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables with a significance of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Unadjusted odds ratios (UORs) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were used to assess the association between independent and dependent variables.

Results

Characteristics of the sample

In this study, 420 patients with diabetes using insulin agreed to participate and were interviewed. Of the 149 excluded patients, 65 had been injecting insulin for <6 months, 79 did not inject the insulin themselves, three used an insulin pump, and two were under the age of 18. Altogether, a total of 271 participants provided valid responses. The age of the participants ranged from 20 to 87 years [63 (55, 70)]. Most participants were married, had diabetes for more than 10 years, and used insulin once or twice a day. Furthermore, we found that 69.0% (187/271) of the participants used needles repeatedly. The sociodemographic, disease and treatment characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Univariate analysis of factors associated with safe disposal of insulin needles.

Disposal practices of insulin needles

Table 2 presents the disposal methods of insulin needles used by our participants. Only 28 participants placed their insulin needles in designated sharps or puncture-resistant containers. Thus, the prevalence of safe sharps disposal practices was 10.3% (28/271). Most participants (89.7%, 243/271) disposed of insulin needles with or without caps directly in their household trash. Regarding the disposal of containers filled with used needles, two of the 28 respondents who safely disposed of used needles did not respond; of the remaining 26 participants, 18 discarded their sharps containers in their household trash.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Participants' disposal practices of insulin needles.

Instruction on sharps disposal

Table 3 shows that 14.8% (45/271) of respondents had received previous instruction on how to handle sharps. The most frequently mentioned source of information was a nurse, followed by a doctor, a friend or relative, and others. The information was primarily obtained verbally. Additionally, the majority (69.7%, 189/271) of participants wanted to receive information regarding sharps disposal verbally.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Instruction on sharps disposal.

Univariate analysis of safe sharps disposal practices

After univariate analysis of factors associated with the safe disposal of insulin needles, the following nine variables were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model: age, education, duration of insulin use, needle reuse, needle stick experience, previous instruction on sharps disposal, awareness of the risk of needle stick injuries, awareness of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission and awareness of the risk of environmental contamination (p < 0.20; Table 1).

Multivariate analysis of safe sharps disposal practices

The Box–Tidwell test indicated that the relationship between age and safe sharps disposal was linear. The VIF values of the nine independent variables that entered the multivariate logistic regression were < 2 and no collinearity was detected. Hosmer-Lemeshow test [chi-square = 0.014, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.906] and omnibus tests of model coefficients (chi-square = 16.680, df = 2, p = 0.000) suggested that forward stepwise (likelihood ratio) multivariate logistic regression was appropriate.

After adjusting for potential confounders, previous instruction on sharps disposal and awareness of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission remained two significant predictors of safe insulin needle disposal practices (Table 4). Patients with diabetes who had previously received sharps disposal instruction were 4.143 times (AOR = 4.143, 95% CI = 1.642–10.450) more likely to dispose of insulin needles safely than those who had not. Furthermore, participants who were aware of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission from unsafe sharps disposal were 3.064 times more likely to dispose of needles safely than those who were not (AOR = 3.064; 95% CI, 1.332–7.046).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with safe disposal of insulin needles (N = 271).

Discussion

This was a cross-sectional study using a self-administered instrument to gain insight into insulin needle disposal practices among patients with diabetes and to explore factors associated with safe sharps disposal practices.

Disposal practices of insulin needles

In the present study, the prevalence of safe sharps disposal practices was low, with only 10.3% of participants safely disposing of their insulin needles. This finding is similar to previous studies conducted in China (9, 11) and other countries (14, 15, 20, 25). However, two studies from the United States showed much higher rates of safe sharps disposal, with Montoya and Huang reporting 67 and 59%, respectively (13, 22). This difference may be related to the specific policies and clear guidelines for at-home sharps disposal that exist in the United States (26, 27).

Of the participants who placed used needles in designated sharps or puncture-resistant containers, most ultimately discarded these containers in their household trash. This is in line with findings from Bangladesh (25), Sri Lanka (12), and India (28). This may be due to the lack of sharps collection terminals or community sharps disposal programs; patients with diabetes do not have access to sharps container disposal and instead place them in household waste (12).

Associated factors of safe sharps disposal

In our study, previous instruction on sharps disposal and awareness of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission were two factors significantly associated with safe sharps disposal practices. Our findings showed that patients with diabetes who had received previous sharps disposal instruction were more likely to have safe sharps disposal practices compared to those who had not. This is supported by the results of other cross-sectional studies (1215). Furthermore, a study conducted in India found that a provider-initiated patient-centered insulin-use health education program with information on sharps disposal significantly improved the knowledge and practice of used insulin sharps disposal among people with diabetes (18). A quasi-experimental study conducted in northeast Peninsular Malaysia reported that a structured community sharps disposal education module that included content on the proper handling of sharps, was effective in improving sharps disposal knowledge and encouraging safe sharps disposal practices among Malaysian patients with diabetes (16). The positive relationship between previous instruction on sharps disposal and safe sharps disposal practices can be explained by the health belief model, where information on safe sharps disposal can serve as a cue for action, activating readiness and stimulating positive health-related behaviors among people with diabetes (29). In contrast, a study conducted in the Philippines showed that sharps disposal instruction from health care professionals was not a significant predictor of safe sharps disposal practices (23). They speculated that this might result from either patients having low adherence to sharps disposal advice from health care professionals or health care professionals providing incorrect information in the first place.

In our study, only a few respondents had previously received instruction on sharps disposal, which is similar to findings from Sri Lanka (12). The reason for this may be that health care professionals and patients are not fully aware that home sharps disposal is a serious public health issue. According to our results, nurses were the primary provider of sharps disposal information, which may result from the fact that education on insulin injection in China is mainly performed by nurses and diabetes educators (30). Notably, most diabetes educators in China are also nurses (31). Future research is needed to identify barriers that prevent other health care professionals from educating patients about safe sharps disposal. Most participants in this study preferred to receive verbal information on how to safely dispose of sharps. Therefore, nurses, diabetes educators, physicians, and pharmacists should provide early and sustainable verbal counseling to their patients to improve sharps disposal practices. Furthermore, online and offline materials, such as pamphlets and videos, should be available for patients to independently review safe sharps disposal practices at home.

Our study also showed that patients with diabetes who were aware of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission were more likely to have safe practices than patients who were not aware of this risk. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in Pakistan, which revealed that people with diabetes who knew the risk of blood-borne disease transmission were less likely to dispose of sharps in their household trash (24). Understanding precautions that can reduce the spread of blood-borne pathogens, such as safe sharps disposal, is important (32). This can be explained by the health belief model, whereby patients who have diabetes understand the serious consequences of blood-borne disease transmission and develop fears about their current behavior, which can motivate them to change this behavior (29). In short, when discussing sharps disposal with patients who have diabetes, health care professionals should inform them of the potential harms associated with unsafe disposal.

Limitations

The present study has some limitations. First, some factors that may influence sharps disposal practices were not included, such as income, place of residence, and comorbid blood-borne diseases. Second, some participants may have had difficulty accurately recalling past events, such as needle stick injuries, duration of diabetes diagnosis, and duration of insulin use, so we cannot exclude the possibility of recall bias. Third, participants in this study were recruited from a single hospital through convenience sampling, which limits the generalizability of our study. A multi-center study with larger samples is needed. In addition, interventional studies could be considered.

Conclusion

In our hospital-based sample of patients with diabetes, the prevalence of safe sharps disposal was low, and only a minority of respondents had received previous sharps disposal instruction. Patients who had previously received sharps disposal instruction and were aware of the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission were more likely to perform sharps disposal correctly. Our results may provide a basis for conducting sharps education programs for patients with diabetes and urging the government to issue regulations for the management of sharps disposal in the community. Our study findings suggest that safe sharps disposal methods and potential risks of unsafe sharps disposal should be incorporated into education programs for patients with diabetes and that health care professionals should receive training on the safe disposal of home-generated sharps.

Data availability statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee in Clinical Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (IRB No. KY2021-180). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

HT performed the analysis, wrote the initial manuscript, and revised the manuscript. XL coordinated the data collection and interpreted the results. XL and CS reviewed the manuscript. JW, ZS, and DL contributed to data collection and data analysis. JL designed the study. CS supervised data collection. ZY and HT conceptualized and designed the study. ZY and JL reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The research was supported by Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau, Grant Number: Y20190033.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th Edition. (2021). Available online at: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/ (accessed August 18, 2022).

2. General Office of National Health and Family Planning Commission, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Notice on the Pilot Project of Graded Diagnosis and Treatment for Hypertension and Diabetes. (2015). Available online at: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s3593g/201512/073b50bd7d2b4454872126f2bc830410.shtml (accessed August 18, 2022).

3. Ministry of Health, Ministry of Finance, National Population and Family Planning Commission. Views on the Promotion of Progressive Equalisation of Basic Public Health Services. (2009). Available online at: http://www.gov.cn/ztzl/ygzt/content_1661065.htm (accessed August 18, 2022).

4. Chinese Diabetes Society. Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 Edition). Chin J Diabetes. (2021) 13:315–409. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095

CrossRef Full Text

5. Yang T, Guo L, Weng J, Zhou Z. Guidelines for insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes in China. Chin J Diabetes. (2016) 8:591–7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2016.10.005

CrossRef Full Text

6. Ji L, Sun Z, Li Q, Qin G, Wei Z, Liu J, et al. Lipohypertrophy in China: prevalence, risk factors, insulin consumption, and clinical impact. Diabetes Technol Ther. (2017) 19:61–7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China & Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. Notice on the Publication of the Catalogue of Medical Waste Classification. (2021). Available online at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/02/content_5655394.htm (accessed August 18, 2022).

8. State Council of the People's Republic of China. Medical Waste Management Regulations. (2011). Available online at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-12/26/content_5574566.htm (accessed August 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

9. Li R, Yuan L. Current situation of insulin injection needle usage in outpaitent diabetes patients. J Nurs. (2014) 21:20–2. doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.09.010

CrossRef Full Text

10. Fang S, Tang C, Huang D, Zhang Y, Pu Q. Survey on the current status of self-management of medical waste by home insulin injectors. Chin Gen Pract Nurs. (2016) 14:311–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2016.03.041

CrossRef Full Text

11. Zhang L. Study on the Status and Influence Factors of Self Injectin of Insulin in Diabetic Patients. Dalian: Dalian Medical University (2017).

12. Atukorala KR, Wickramasinghe SI, Sumanasekera RDN, Wickramasinghe KH. Practices related to sharps disposal among diabetic patients in Sri Lanka. Asia Pac Fam Med. (2018) 17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12930-018-0049-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

13. Huang L, Katsnelson S, Yang J, Argyrou C, Charitou MM. Factors contributing to appropriate sharps disposal in the community among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. (2018) 31:155–8. doi: 10.2337/ds17-0033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hasan UA, Mohd Hairon S, Yaacob NM, Daud A, Abdul Hamid A, Hassan N, et al. Factors contributing to sharp waste disposal at health care facility among diabetic patients in North-East Peninsular Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:2251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hassan NM, Shalaby SES, Atalla AO, Younis EA. Toward safe environment: injection device disposal among diabetic patients attending tertiary care academic clinic in middle Delta, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2021) 28:23193–203. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12393-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hasan UA, Mohd Hairon S, Yaacob NM, Daud A, Abdul Hamid A, Hassan N, et al. Effectiveness of diabetes community sharp disposal education module in primary care: an experimental study in North-East Peninsular Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:3356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

17. Zou H, Guo X. Nursing intervention on the disposal of medical waste at home for outpatients with diabetes in Liangshan Yi Nationality region. Nurs J Chin People's Lib Army. (2019) 36:78–80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2019.10.020

CrossRef Full Text

18. Moray KV, Manjunath K, Martina Shalini AJ, Pricilla SR, John SM, Prasad JH. The insulin sharps disposal study: evaluation of a structured patient education initiative in an urban community health Centre in India. J Family Med Prim Care. (2020) 9:6164–70. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1295_20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tong G, Shen J, Wan G, Lv H. Management of disposal insulin pen-injector needle for rural diabetic patients. J Nurs Sci. (2020) 35:22–3. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.01.022

CrossRef Full Text

20. Basazn Mekuria A, Melaku Gebresillassie B, Asfaw Erku D, Taye Haile K, Melese Birru E. Knowledge and Self-reported practice of insulin injection device disposal among diabetes patients in Gondar Town, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Diabetes Res. (2016) 2016:1897517. doi: 10.1155/2016/1897517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Khan AM, Al Ghamdi RA, Alswat KA. Knowledge, attitude and practice on disposal of sharps waste at home among patients with diabetes and their caregivers. Curr Diabetes Rev. (2021) 17:e170920186033. doi: 10.2174/1573399816999200917162514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Montoya JM, Thompson BM, Boyle ME, Leighton ME, Cook CB. Patterns of sharps handling and disposal among insulin-using patients with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. (2021) 15:60–6. doi: 10.1177/1932296819882926

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Quiwa L, Jimeno C. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on the disposal of sharps in patients of the up-philippine general hospital diabetes clinic. J ASEAN Fed of Endocr Soc. (2014) 29:141–51. doi: 10.15605/jafes.029.02.07

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ishtiaq O, Qadri AM, Mehar S, Gondal GM, Iqbal T, Ali S, et al. Disposal of syringes, needles, and lancets used by diabetic patients in Pakistan. J Infect Public Health. (2012) 5:182–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2012.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kamrul-Hasan A, Paul AK, Amin MN, Gaffar MAJ, Asaduzzaman M, Saifuddin M, et al. Insulin injection practice and injection complications - results from the Bangladesh insulin injection technique survey. Eur Endocrinol. (2020) 16:41–8. doi: 10.17925/EE.2020.16.1.41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Administration UFD. Dos and Don'ts of Proper Sharps Disposal. (2021). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safely-using-sharps-needles-and-syringes-home-work-and-travel/dos-and-donts-proper-sharps-disposal (accessed August 18, 2022).

27. SafeNeedleDisposal.org. How to Dispose of Used Sharps. (2022). Available online at: https://safeneedledisposal.org/ (accessed August 18, 2022).

28. Kalra S, Mithal A, Sahay R, John M, Unnikrishnan AG, Saboo B, et al. Indian injection technique study: population characteristics and injection practices. Diabetes Ther. (2017) 8:637–57. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0243-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bao J. Health Promotion and Health Education in Nursing, 2nd ed. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press (2018).

30. Ji L, Guo X, Huang J, Ji Q, Jia W, Li L, et al. Guideline for diabetes drug injeciton technique in China (2016 edition). Chin J Diabetes. (2017) 9:79–105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2017.02.005

CrossRef Full Text

31. Xiong Z, Yuan L, Guo X, Sun Z, Zhao F, Lou Q, et al. Effects of China diabetes educator training and its influencing factors. Chin J Nurs. (2017) 52:816–9. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.07.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lin C, Aljuaid M, Tirada N. Needlestick injuries in radiology: prevention and management. Clin Radiol. (2022) 77:496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: diabetes, patients, sharps, needles, disposal

Citation: Tu H, Lu X, Wang J, Sheng Z, Liu D, Li J, Sun C and Yin Z (2022) At-home disposal practices of used insulin needles among patients with diabetes in China: A single-center, cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health 10:1027514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027514

Received: 25 August 2022; Accepted: 22 November 2022;
Published: 08 December 2022.

Edited by:

Sudip Bhattacharya, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar (AIIMS Deoghar), India

Reviewed by:

Himel Mondal, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar (AIIMS Deoghar), India
Pranjali Sharma, Parkview Health System, United States

Copyright © 2022 Tu, Lu, Wang, Sheng, Liu, Li, Sun and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haixia Tu, tuhaixia2020@126.com; Jufang Li, lijufang911@126.com; Caixia Sun, 512177824@qq.com; Zhiqin Yin, yzq@wmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.