This article is a correction to:
Social Quarantine and Its Four Modes: Conceptional Exploration and the Theoretical Construction of the Policies Against COVID-19
Ka Lin
Ayesha Mumtaz
Mohammad Anisur Rahaman
Ka Ho Mok- 1College of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- 2Institute of Policy Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, China
A Corrigendum on
Social Quarantine and Its Four Modes: Conceptional Exploration and the Theoretical Construction of the Policies Against COVID-19
by Lin, K., Mumtaz, A., Rahaman, M. A., and Mok, K. H. (2021). Front. Public Health 9:614476. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.614476
In the published article, there was an error in Title. Instead of “Polices,” it should be “Policies.”
In the original article, there was a formatting mistake in Table 1 as published. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
TABLE 1
Table 1. Ranking of the GDP and the situation of Covid-19 in European states.
In the original article, there was an error on Page 2, the word “at” was used incorrectly, and should be “as,” the correct text appears below.
“Moisio (19) pointed out that social quarantine may aggravate social inequalities and class disparities since the most vulnerable groups during the pandemic were those low- and middle-income families as these groups were severely affected by market closures and months of factory lockdowns.”
In the original article, there was an error on Page 3, the word “theological” was used incorrectly, and should be written as “theoretical,” the correct text appears below.
“Since the function of social quarantine can be interpreted from different angles and approaches, our analysis should look at both the macro- and micro-levels of social actions to develop the conceptual and theoretical work to respond many complicated issues to be engaged.”
In the original article, there was an error on Page 5, the word “seventh” was used incorrectly, and should be written as “twelve,” the correct text appears below.
“In Europe, Germany ranked first in terms of per capita gross domestic product. In this pandemic, its number of reported cases is twelve among the top 10 European economies (see Table 1), and its mortality rate is not very high (nearly 11% of infections).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: quarantine, social quarantine, social contact, COVID-19, global health, social policy, community, pandemic
Citation: Lin K, Mumtaz A, Rahaman MA and Mok KH (2021) Corrigendum: Social Quarantine and Its Four Modes: Conceptional Exploration and the Theoretical Construction of the Policies Against COVID-19. Front. Public Health 9:793721. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.793721
Received: 12 October 2021; Accepted: 03 November 2021;
Published: 25 November 2021.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2021 Lin, Mumtaz, Rahaman and Mok. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ka Ho Mok, a2Fob21vayYjeDAwMDQwO2xuLmVkdS5oaw==