Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 23 November 2021
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic The Obesity Epidemic: Causes, Context, Prevention View all 15 articles

Sex-Related Difference in the Association Between Child Neglect and the Accuracy of Body Weight Perception Among Chinese Primary Schoolchildren

\nHong-jie Yu&#x;Hong-jie Yu1Xiangxiang Liu&#x;Xiangxiang Liu2Ming-wei Liu,Ming-wei Liu1,3Min-zhe ZhangMin-zhe Zhang1Miaobing ZhengMiaobing Zheng4Qi-qiang He,
Qi-qiang He1,5*
  • 1School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 3The Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 4Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VC, Australia
  • 5Hubei Biomass-Resource Chemistry and Environmental Biotechnology Key Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Introduction: Body weight perception (BWP) directly determines weight management behaviors. Although child neglect is a well-established risk factor for managing body weight, little is known about its association with the accuracy of BWP. This study aimed to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between child neglect and BWP accuracy in primary schoolchildren, and explore how these differ based on the sex of the child.

Methods: The sample included 1,063 primary schoolchildren (557 boys and 506 girls, aged 8–10 years) from a two-wave observational study between 2018 and 2019 in Wuhan, China. Child neglect and BWP were investigated using self-administered questionnaires. The accuracy of BWP was defined by comparing the BWP and actual body weight, and it was categorized into three groups—consistent, underestimated, and overestimated. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted with fitting child neglect as the independent variable and the accuracy of BWP as the dependent variable.

Results: The prevalence of weight misperception was ~44% at baseline (underestimation 40%; overestimation 4%) in Chinese primary schoolchildren. In the cross-sectional analysis, children with a higher level of neglect were more likely to misperceive their body weight. Moreover, there was an apparent sex-related difference that boys who experienced a higher level of neglect significantly reported more underestimation, while girls reported more overestimation. There was no significant longitudinal association between child neglect and the change in BWP accuracy.

Conclusions: This study revealed that a higher level of neglect was significantly associated with underestimated BWP in boys and overestimated BWP in girls. The mechanisms of sex-related difference and whether child neglect is involved in the change in BWP, merit further investigations.

Introduction

Body weight perception (BWP) is conceptualized as how people understand and perceive their body weight (1). It plays an important role in the management of body weight with consciousness and behaviors (2). Studies have revealed that BWP directly influences weight-control behaviors, including physical activities, and dietary behaviors (26). On the one hand, the misperception of body weight in those who are underweight, overweight, or obese may reduce the interest in or attempts at weight-control behaviors (5, 7). On the other hand, in those with normal weight, the misperception of body weight fuels the transition to unhealthy lifestyles (1). Given that the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is persistently high (over 20%) in China (8), improving the accuracy of BWP may be an effective strategy to control abnormal weight in children.

Body weight perception interacts with the actual body weight, and is affected by a range of social factors (9). Of these, child maltreatment is of particular interest, since it comprehensively reflects the child's growth environment (10). Several systematic reviews have indicated that childhood maltreatment contributed to a lifelong risk for obesity (1113). However, little is known about the association between child maltreatment and BWP. To the best of our knowledge, only two studies assessed the relationship between childhood maltreatment and the discrepancy of BWP, but both in adults (14, 15). Late childhood to early adolescence is a critical window for physical and psychological development; children and adolescents begin to notice their own body shape and how peers perceive them (16). Therefore, an investigation into the association between child maltreatment and BWP during this period is warranted.

Additionally, sex was closely related to BWP, where underestimation of body weight is more common in boys, while overestimation is more common in girls (17, 18). Furthermore, there were differences in child maltreatment, in that boys were more likely to experience higher levels of emotional and physical neglect than girls (19). These findings suggested that the association between child maltreatment and BWP might differ depending on sex. Child maltreatment is a multidimensional concept that includes physical and sexual abuse, and neglect. Of these, child neglect is the most prevalent subtype, but received the least concern in the current study (20, 21). Given the high burden of child neglect (the prevalence was nearly 50%) (21) and inaccurate BWP (the prevalence of misperception was over 30%) (17, 22), we conducted a two-wave observational study to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between child neglect and the accuracy of BWP, and assess whether those vary by sex.

Methods

Study Design

This study was originally designed to investigate the health outcomes of child neglect in a convenience sample in four public primary schools in Wuhan, China. All students from grades 3 to 4 were invited to participate in the baseline study in April 2018, and would be followed-up with annually until graduation from primary school (grade 6). Written informed consent was obtained from children and parents. This study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Wuhan University.

Participants

A total of 1,340 children (aged 9.1 ± 0.6 years) were included at baseline following the inclusion criteria: (i) without preexisting congenital diseases and defects (e.g., diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and disability); (ii) not being transfer students or the transfer period was over one semester; and (iii) did not suffer major family changes (e.g., parents' divorce and relative's death). This study used the data of baseline and the first wave of follow-up (2019) for data analysis. A total of 1,193 children completed the two-wave observation, and 147 children were lost to follow-up (attrition rate: 11%) because of the following reasons: sick/compassionate leave, school transfer, and refusal to partake in the follow-up investigation.

Measurements

Body weight: Children's height without shoes and with light clothes was measured using standard methods to calculate BMI, with weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2) (23). The actual body weight was defined as severe underweight, underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, using the BMI reference values for Chinese school-age children (24).

Body weight perception: BWP was determined by asking “Which body shape do you think you have?” There were five possible responses: “too thin,” “relatively thin,” “all right,” “relatively heavy,” and “too heavy” (16). The accuracy of BWP was examined by comparing the actual body weight with the BWP. Children who were (severely) underweight but perceived themselves as “all right” and “relatively (too) heavy” and those with normal weight who perceived themselves as “relatively (too) heavy” were categorized as “overestimated.” Conversely, children who were overweight or obese but perceived themselves as “all right” and “too (relatively) thin” and those with normal weight who perceived themselves as “relatively (too) thin” were categorized as “underestimated.” Children who are (severely) underweight and perceived themselves as “relatively thin” or “too thin,” who were normal weight and perceived themselves as “all right,” and those who were overweight or obese and perceived themselves as “relatively heavy” or “too heavy,” were categorized under “consistent” (25).

Child neglect: Child neglect was assessed using the Child Neglect Scale (CNS) developed by Yang et al. (26), which comprises 38 items in four dimensions: physical neglect (7 items); emotional neglect (14 items); security neglect (9 items); and communication neglect (8 items). Each item was evaluated using a four-point Likert scale: “never,” “occasional,” “usual,” and “constant.” The CNS has been validated in Chinese schoolchildren and has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and test-retest reliability (0.90) (27). The total score of the CNS ranges from 4 to 152, with a higher score indicating a higher level of neglect. This study used the tertiles of neglect for analysis.

Covariates: Age and sex were reported by children. Demographic characteristics, including monthly household income, parental education, and single-child family were reported by parents. Monthly household income was classified as “ <10,000,” “10,000–20,000,” and “>20,000” (RMB). Parental education was classified as “middle school or lower,” “high school,” and “university or higher.” The single-child family was determined with a “yes” and “no.” The pubertal stage was evaluated in a private room by trained investigators using the Tanner Stage Scale. The pubertal development was determined by comparing the external primary and secondary sex characteristics of children with the realistic color image of the Tanner Stage Scale (28).

Procedures

Body weight perception and child neglect were assessed in classrooms with the guidance of teachers, using self-administered questionnaires. All questionnaires were answered independently to protect privacy and were signed with real names for tracking during the follow-up. Trained investigators read and explained each item in the questionnaires to facilitate completion by the children. The children were then invited to attend the anthropometric test and pubertal stage evaluation in separate locations, according to sex. The demographic information was also collected using questionnaires, which were brought home by children.

Statistical Analysis

Among the 1,193 children who completed the baseline and follow-up surveys, 130 were excluded from the final analysis because of missing information in child neglect, actual body weight, BWP, or other covariates. Chi-square test was used to examine the difference in all variables between sex and between the included and excluded samples. All descriptive statistics of 1,063 children (557 boys and 506 girls) were categorical variables and presented as frequency (%). Multinomial logistical regression model regarding the consistent BWP as reference group was used to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between child neglect, and the accuracy of BWP stratified by sex. For cross-sectional analyses, model 1 was adjusted for school, age, monthly household income, parental education, and single-child family at baseline, and model 2 was further adjusted for pubertal stage and BMI at baseline. For longitudinal analyses, BWP at baseline was further included in model 1. The threshold for the statistical significance was set at P-value < 0.05. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used to conduct all analyses.

Results

As shown in Table 1, the children's age ranged from 8 to 10 years. Approximately 70% of the children lived in a household with a monthly income of over 10,000 yuan, or parents with a university degree or higher. More than half of the children had no siblings in the family. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between sex. Boys had a higher level of child neglect than girls (tertiles 2–3: 66.4 vs. 59.1%). The prevalence of underweight and overweight children was ~3 and 20%, respectively, in all children at baseline, while the prevalence of overweight boys (23%) was much higher than overweight girls (15.6%). The prevalence of underweight and overweight children was 1.4 and 25.6%, respectively, in all children during follow-up, and the sex-related difference was still significant. Nearly half of the children perceived their body weight as too (relatively) thin/heavy at baseline and follow-up, with no significant sex-related difference. Approximately 40% of the children did not perceive their body weight accurately at baseline and follow-up. Among them, underestimation was more common than overestimation, regardless of sex. Sex-related difference in BWP accuracy was insignificant at baseline, but significant at follow-up. There were no significant differences in all variables between the included and excluded samples, except for a marginally significant lower level of neglect among children in the excluded sample (Supplementary Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics in the sample of 1,063 primary schoolchildren.

Table 2 shows the cross-sectional analysis between child neglect and the accuracy of BWP in all children or stratified by sex. In the overall sample, children in the highest tertile of neglect were more likely to report underestimation (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.17–2.17, P = 0.003) and overestimation (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.01–4.74, P = 0.047) of their own body weight compared with those in the first tertile, even when adjusted for demographical characteristics, pubertal stage, and BMI. However, the sex-stratified analysis indicated that boys in the highest tertile of neglect showed increased odds of underestimating their body weight (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.16–2.80, P = 0.009), while the association between child neglect and underestimated BWP was not significant in girls (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.86–2.12, P = 0.189). Conversely, there was a significant association between child neglect and overestimated BWP in girls (OR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.18–9.57, P = 0.023) for the highest tertile of child neglect, which was not significant in boys (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.30–3.38, P = 0.991).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Cross-sectional analysis for the association of child neglect with the accuracy of body weight perception at baseline.

The accuracy of BWP at follow-up, with child neglect at baseline, was also examined (Table 3). However, child neglect at baseline was not associated with the misperception of body weight at follow-up, in both overall and sex-stratified analyses.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Longitudinal analysis for the association of child neglect with the accuracy of body weight perception at follow-up.

Discussions

There was a high discrepancy between BWP and actual body weight in Chinese schoolchildren, with nearly 40% of the children reporting underestimation, and 5% reporting overestimation. This study revealed a significant cross-sectional association between child neglect and underestimated and overestimated BWP. Moreover, the association differed in sex that boys with higher neglect were more likely to report underestimated BWP, while girls with higher neglect were more likely to report overestimated BWP. However, longitudinal associations were not significant in both overall and sex-stratified analyses.

The prevalence of inaccurate BWP was nearly 45% in our study, which was slightly higher than that in previous studies among Chinese schoolchildren (17, 18, 29). Comparing those studies, the prevalence of the underestimated BWP was consistently much higher than that of the overestimated BWP (17, 18, 29), and the magnitude varied from ~2 times higher (25.3% underestimated BWP vs. 13.1% overestimated BWP) in the study of Wang VH et al. (18) to 10 times higher than (about 40% underestimated BWP vs. 4% overestimated BWP) in our study. This was mainly due to the difference in the study setting that all children in our study lived in urban areas, while 63% of the children in a study by Wang Y et al. (17) and 47% of the children in a study by Wang (18) lived in rural areas. Therefore, rural-urban variation may affect the difference between the prevalence of the underestimated and overestimated BWP. Additionally, a similar significant sex-related difference was observed in a study by Wang Y et al. (17), while Wang VH et al. (18) reported an insignificant sex-related difference in children aged 6–11 years. They consistently explained that the sex-related difference may result from different beliefs of ideal body image, in that boys preferred masculinity and girls preferred femininity (17, 18). Furthermore, Wang infers that the prevalence of the underestimated and overestimated BWP may change a lot from childhood to adolescence in girls, and that a higher proportion of girls will overestimate their body weight (18). Therefore, future weight management programs for children and adolescence should consider the sex-related difference in the different growth and developmental stages.

Currently, no study examines the association between child neglect and inaccurate BWP in children, while two studies in adults consistently indicated that child maltreatment was associated with inaccurate BWP in adulthood (14, 15). These studies suggested that adults with higher child maltreatment may be more sensitive and vulnerable to subsequent stressors and consequently, easily misperceive their body weight (14, 15). In addition, as for children, the maltreatment experience directly leads to maladjustment, including depression and low self-esteem (30). In turn, the adverse psychological consequence was associated with inaccurate BWP (16, 31). Additionally, child neglect in families inherently results from parents/caregivers. The lack of supervision and communication between children and parents may lead to children's BWP is more likely influenced by peers and social media (17). On the other hand, the lack of attachment and security caused by neglect exacerbates the parent-child discrepancy in children's BWP. A study by Uccula et al. indicated that parents of children with insecurities had a tendency to underestimate the actual body weight of their children, particularly those who were overweight or obese (32). In this situation, parents believe that their children perceive themselves as more obese than the parents perceive them, and unconsciously construct an obesogenic family environment (32).

Importantly, our study highlighted the sex-related difference in the association between child neglect and misperception of body weight, which was also consistent with the findings of two studies in adults (14, 15). These studies consistently explained that females with a higher level of child maltreatment were more vulnerable to life stress (14, 15), and it might be fueled by maladaptive strategies that used body shape to determine self-worth (14). However, it was unclear whether the explanation could be applied to children. In addition, children's coping strategies with stress differ in sex, in that girls were more likely to suffer from depression after relational victimization (33). Moreover, a study by Wei et al. indicated that girls who experienced childhood trauma displayed a higher risk of depression than boys (34). Additionally, we failed to identify a longitudinal significant association between child neglect and the accuracy of BWP. We supposed that the measurement of body weight might have an influence on children's BWP and that the preface of the parents' questionnaire reminded them to focus on children's body weight.

Strengths and Limitations

To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first to investigate the association between child neglect and the accuracy of BWP using a longitudinal design. Our findings directly indicated the negative influence of child neglect on the accuracy of BWP, which indirectly emphasized that the development of BWP and the management of body weight required family support. Additionally, the identification of sex-related differences in their association will be helpful for explaining the sex-related difference in the prevalence of childhood obesity and the inaccuracy of BWP in children in China.

This study has several limitations. First, this study used a convenience sampling method, with a high proportion of children from high socioeconomic families. Second, four public schools were in the urban areas. Therefore, the generalizability of our results is limited by sample selection bias. Third, ~11% of the children were excluded from the final analysis, which might also result in selection bias. However, the comparison of all variables between the included and excluded samples was insignificant. Fourth, child neglect was assessed using a self-reported questionnaire, making a recall bias inevitable. However, CNS has been validated and has shown good reliability in Chinese schoolchildren. Finally, other potential confounders to BWP, including exposure to social media and psychological factors, were not assessed in the analysis.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the prevalence of inaccurate BWP was common in Chinese primary schoolchildren, and largely consisted of underestimated BWP. Importantly, our study revealed that child neglect was significantly associated with inaccurate BWP. Moreover, a significant sex-related difference was identified that boys who experienced a higher level of neglect were more likely to report underestimated BWP, while girls who had been neglected were more likely to report overestimated BWP. The mechanisms of sex-related difference and whether child neglect is involved in the change in BWP merit further investigations.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Wuhan University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

H-jY: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. XL: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. M-wL: investigation, project administration, and writing-review and editing. MZ: methodology and writing—review and editing. Q-qH: conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, and writing-review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

HY was supported by the Special Fund Support for Postgraduate Overseas Exchange Program of Wuhan University and XL was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M692215) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515111134).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

All authors thank the students, parents, teachers, and investigators who participated in this study.

References

1. Nissen NK, Holm L. Literature review: perceptions and management of body size among normal weight and moderately overweight people. Obes Rev. (2015) 16:150–60. doi: 10.1111/obr.12231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Solmi F, Sharpe Ph DH, Gage SH, Maddock J, Lewis G, Patalay P. Changes in the prevalence and correlates of weight-control behaviors and weight perception in adolescents in the UK, 1986–2015. JAMA Pediatr. (2021) 175:267–75. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Deierlein AL, Malkan A, Litvak J, Parekh N. Weight perception, weight control intentions, and dietary intakes among adolescents ages 10(-)15 years in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 1:990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dues K, Kandiah J, Khubchandani J, Haroldson A. Adolescent body weight perception: association with diet and physical activity behaviors. J Sch Nurs. (2020) 36:339–47. doi: 10.1177/1059840518824386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Xu F, Cohen SA, Greaney ML, Greene GW. The Association between US adolescents' weight status, weight perception, weight satisfaction, and their physical activity and dietary behaviors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 1:1931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang J, Feng X, Zhai Y, Li W, Lv YB, Astell-Burt T, et al. Clustering of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours and associations with perceived and actual weight status among primary school children in China: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Prev Med. (2018) 11:6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Duncan DT, Wolin KY, Scharoun-Lee M, Ding EL, Warner ET, Bennett GG. Does perception equal reality? Weight misperception in relation to weight-related attitudes and behaviors among overweight and obese US adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2011) 8:20. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dong Y, Jan C, Ma Y, Dong B, Zou Z, Yang Y, et al. Economic development and the nutritional status of Chinese school-aged children and adolescents from 1995 to 201: an analysis of five successive national surveys. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2019) 7:288–99. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30075-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Pauline M, Selvam S, Swaminathan S, Vaz M. Body weight perception is associated with socio-economic status and current body weight in selected urban and rural South Indian school-going children. Public Health Nutr. (2012) 15:2348–56. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Berens AE, Nelson CA. The science of early adversity: is there a role for large institutions in the care of vulnerable children? Lancet. (2015) 386:388–398. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61131-44

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Schroeder K, Schuler BR, Kobulsky JM, Sarwer DB. The association between adverse childhood experiences and childhood obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. (2021) 1:204. doi: 10.1111/obr.13204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Danese A, Tan M. Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. (2014) 19:544–54. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.54

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. (2012) 9:e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ruiz AL, Font SA. Role of childhood maltreatment on weight and weight-related behaviors in adulthood. Health Psychol. (2020) 39:986–96. doi: 10.1037/hea0001027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Udo T, Grilo CM. Perceived weight discrimination, childhood maltreatment, and weight gain in US adults with overweight/obesity. Obesity. (2016) 24:1366–72. doi: 10.1002/oby.21474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tang J, Yu Y, Du Y, Ma Y, Zhu H, Liu Z. Association between actual weight status, perceived weight and depressive, anxious symptoms in Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2010) 1:594. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang Y, Liu HJ, Wu FY, Yang XD, Yue MJ, Pang YX, et al. The association between BMI and body weight perception among children and adolescents in Jilin City, China. PLoS ONE. (2018) 1:37. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang VH, Min J, Xue H, Du S, Xu F, Wang H, et al. What factors may contribute to sex differences in childhood obesity prevalence in China? Public Health Nutr. (2018) 21:2056–64. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chung MC, Chen ZS. Gender differences in child abuse, emotional processing difficulties, alexithymia, psychological symptoms and behavioural problems among chinese adolescents. Psychiatr Q. (2020) 91:321–32. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09700-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mulder TM, Kuiper KC, van der Put CE, Stams GJM, Assink M. Risk factors for child neglect: a meta-analytic review. Child Abuse Negl. (2018) 7:198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang L, Cheng H, Qu YH, Zhang Y, Cui Q, Zou HO. The prevalence of child maltreatment among Chinese primary and middle school students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psych Psych Epid. (2020) 55:1105–19. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01916-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhao M, Zhang M, Zhou XQ, Yang HY, Yang YH, Yang NH. Weight misperception and its barriers to keep health weight in Chinese children. Acta Paediatr. (2012) 101:e550–e556. doi: 10.1111/apa.12011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yu HJ, Li F, Hu YF, Li CF, Yuan S, Song Y, Zheng M, Gong J, et al. Improving the metabolic and mental health of children with obesity: a school-based nutrition education and physical activity intervention in Wuhan, China. Nutrients. (2020) 1:194. doi: 10.3390/nu12010194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Song P, Li X, Gasevic D, Flores AB, Yu Z, BMI. Waist circumference reference values for chinese school-aged children and adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 1:368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Bojorquez I, Villatoro J, Delgadillo M, Fleiz C, Fregoso D, Unikel C. Social factors, weight perception, and weight control practices among adolescents in Mexico. J Health Psychol. (2018) 23:939–50. doi: 10.1177/1359105316643596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yang SC, Zhang YL, Du AL. Development, Reliability and Validity of Child-Neglect Scale. J Appl Clin Pediatr. (2009) 24:1293–96. doi: 10.1177/1077559504269536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Yang S, Du AL, Zhang YL. Preliminary Study on Child Neglect Scale in 871 Children at Xiangtan City. Chin Mental Health J. (2007) 21:819–21. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.140970

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sun Y, Tao FB, Su PY, China Puberty Research C. Self-assessment of pubertal Tanner stage by realistic colour images in representative Chinese obese and non-obese children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr. (2012) 101:e163–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02568.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Cai L, Zhang T, Ma J, Ma L, Jing J, Chen Y. Self-perception of weight status and its association with weight-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among Chinese children in Guangzhou. J Epidemiol. (2017) 27:338–45. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kim J, Cicchetti D. Longitudinal trajectories of self-system processes and depressive symptoms among maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child Dev. (2006) 77:624–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00894.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Gaskin JL, Pulver AJ, Branch K, Kabore A, James T, Zhang J. Perception or reality of body weight: which matters to the depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2013) 150:350–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Uccula A, Nuvoli G. Parent-child discrepancy on children's body weight perception: the role of attachment security. Front Psychol. (2017) 25:1500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Stange JP, Hamilton JL, Abramson LY, Alloy LBA. vulnerability-stress examination of response styles theory in adolescence: stressors, sex differences, and symptom specificity. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. (2014) 43:813–27. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.812037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wei J, Gong Y, Wang X, Shi J, Ding H, Zhang M, et al. Gender differences in the relationships between different types of childhood trauma and resilience on depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents. Prev Med. (2021) 14:106523. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: child neglect, body weight perception, sex differences, children, multinomial logistic regression

Citation: Yu H-j, Liu X, Liu M-w, Zhang M-z, Zheng M and He Q-q (2021) Sex-Related Difference in the Association Between Child Neglect and the Accuracy of Body Weight Perception Among Chinese Primary Schoolchildren. Front. Public Health 9:769604. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.769604

Received: 02 September 2021; Accepted: 25 October 2021;
Published: 23 November 2021.

Edited by:

Peter Congdon, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Timothy Lynn Taylor, Independent Researcher, Wellton, AZ, United States
Tonia Vassilakou, University of West Attica, Greece

Copyright © 2021 Yu, Liu, Liu, Zhang, Zheng and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qi-qiang He, heqiqiang@gmail.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.