Carla Gramaglia1,2
Eleonora Gattoni2†
Debora Marangon2†
Diego Concina1
Elena Grossini1Carmela Rinaldi1Massimiliano Panella1
Patrizia Zeppegno1,2*- 1Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- 2Psychiatry Ward, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
Introduction: Compared to old people who live at home, depressive symptoms are more prevalent in those who live in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Different kinds of non-pharmacological treatment approaches in LTCFs have been studied, including behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapy, cognitive bibliotherapy, problem-solving therapy, brief psychodynamic therapy and life review/reminiscence. The aim of the current review was to systematically review non-pharmacological treatments used to treat depressed older adults with no or mild cognitive impairment (as described by a Mini Mental State Examination score > 20) living in LTCFs.
Methods: A research was performed on PubMed and Scopus databases. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) flowchart, studies selection was made. The quality of each Randomized Controlled Trial was scored using the Jadad scale, Quasi-Experimental Design studies and Non-Experimental studies were scored based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)
Results: The review included 56 full text articles; according to the type of intervention, studies were grouped in the following areas: horticulture/gardening (n = 3), pet therapy (n = 4), physical exercise (n = 9), psychoeducation/rehabilitation (n = 15), psychotherapy (n = 3), reminiscence and story sharing (n = 14), miscellaneous (n = 8).
Discussion and Conclusion: Despite mixed or negative findings in some cases, most studies included in this systematic review reported that the non-pharmacological interventions assessed were effective in the management of depressed elderly in the LTCFs context. Regrettably, the limitations and heterogeneity of the studies described above hinder the possibility to generalize and replicate results.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), between 2015 and 2050 the proportion of the older adults (>60 years old) is estimated to almost double to 22%. Among the general older population, depression occurs in 7% and it accounts for 5.7% of Years Lived with Disability (YLDs). Under the label of “depression,” different diagnoses can be found in older adults: major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), minor depression, mood disorders related to a general medical condition, bereavement, adjustment disorder, substance-induced mood disorder, and dementia with depressed mood. Overall, in this selected population depression is often underdiagnosed and undertreated, sometimes even neglected. Moreover, older depressed people have poorer functioning compared to those with other chronic medical conditions (e.g., lung disease, hypertension or diabetes) (1).
A particularly frail portion of older adults is represented by those living in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Compared to old people who live at home, depressive symptoms are more prevalent in those who live in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) (2). Teresi et al. (3) reported a prevalence of major depressive disorder and minor depression of 14.4 and 16.8%, respectively, in nursing home residents. It is also noticeable that depression raises risk for medical morbidity and poor health outcomes in older adults and it can be a predictor for long-term risk of increased disability, heart disease, dementia, mortality, and suicide (4, 5).
Briefly, depressive disorders in older adults represent a heterogenous and complex phenomenon and a diagnostic challenge, due to not recognized or underestimated symptomatology, correlation with cognitive impairment or other severe medical conditions, overlapping effects of pharmacological treatments—both psychopharmacological and other—and finally peculiar existential or contextual problems, with particular regard to the nursing homes setting. This complexity can be found also in treatment approaches, especially non-pharmacological ones in nursing homes (6, 7).
Different kinds of non-pharmacological treatment approaches in LTCFs have been applied, with results suggesting a high variability on the subpopulations of elderly involved, settings, treatment models and outcomes (8–10). Several psychotherapeutic approaches have been studied and described in previous reviews, including behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapy, cognitive bibliotherapy, problem-solving therapy, brief psychodynamic therapy, and life review/reminiscence (11–14), Reminiscence Therapy (RT) (15), light therapy (16), music-art-creative therapy (17), and pet therapy (18). Nonetheless, only few of these reviews specifically focused on the specific population of non-cognitively impaired elderly living in nursing homes.
The aim of the current review was to systematically review non-pharmacological treatments used to treat depressed older adults with no or mild cognitive impairment (as described by a Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] score > 20) living in LTCFs, in order to offer an up-to-date synthesis of the available literature about this topic.
Methods
Our research question was the following: Are non-pharmacological approaches effective in addressing depression in elderly people with no or mild cognitive impairment residing in LTCFs?
Our PICO (20) was:
PubMed and Scopus databases were searched on 03/05/2020 with the following search strings:
PubMed database:
(((((“aged”[MeSH] OR “aging”[MeSH] OR “Aged, 80 and over”[Mesh] OR “old age people” OR elder* OR adult* OR retired OR ancient*))))) AND (((((((((((((((“Assisted Living Facilities”[Mesh]) OR “Community Health Nursing”[Mesh]) OR “Group Homes”[Mesh]) OR “Halfway Houses”[Mesh]) OR “Health Facility Environment”[Mesh]) OR “Homes for the Aged”[Mesh]) OR “Institutionalization”[Mesh]) OR “Long-Term Care”[Mesh]) OR “Nursing Care”[Mesh]) OR “Nursing Homes”[Mesh]) OR “Rehabilitation Centers”[Mesh]) OR “Rehabilitation Nursing”[Mesh]) OR “Residential Facilities”[Mesh]) OR “Housing for the Elderly”[Mesh]) OR “Geriatric Nursing”[Mesh])) AND ((depression [MeSH] OR depression [text word] OR depress* [text word] OR depressive symptoms [text word] OR emotional depression [text word] OR depressive disorder [MeSH] OR depressive disorder [text word] OR depressive disorder, major [MeSH] OR major depression [text word] OR MDD [text word] OR major depressive disorder [text word]))
Scopus database:
(ALL (“Assisted Living Facilities” OR “Community Health Nursing” OR “Group Homes” OR “Halfway Houses” OR “Health Facility Environment” OR “Home(s)* for the Aged” OR “Institutionalization” OR “Long-Term Care” OR “Nursing Care” OR “Nursing Homes”)) AND (ALL (“aged” OR “aging” OR “Aged, 80 and over” OR “old age people” OR elder* OR adult* OR retired OR ancient*)) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Depression”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Depressive symptoms”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Emotional depression”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Depressive disorder”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Major depression”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“MDD”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Major depressive disorder”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Depress*”))
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA, 2009) flowchart (19) (Figure 1), studies selection was made from 04/05/2020 to 10/07/2020, screening titles first, then abstracts and eventually the full texts of the articles. Two independent reviewers (D.M., E.G.) assessed the articles identified by the search strings (see above); a third reviewer (C.G.) resolved any discrepancies that emerged between the reviewers.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2009 flow diagram. From: Moher et al. (19).
The following inclusion/exclusion criteria were established for the selection of studies:
Patients' age over 65 years old; patients living in nursing home residence or similar structures (LTCFs); diagnosis of depression, either based on clinical assessment or on the administration of questionnaires or scales; no or mild cognitive impairment (as described by a MMSE score > 20, or by a score on the Mini-Cog ≥ 3, or similar results among other tests for the assessment of cognitive impairment).
Literature reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, editorials, book comments and chapters, articles not in English language were excluded from this review work.
For each study, the following information was tabulated: author and year of publication, sample size, demographic data (mean age, gender), dropout rate, type of study design (RCT: Randomized Controlled Trial; QED: Quasi Experimental Design; NE: Non-experimental), residential care type, measures for dementia, measures for depression, intervention performed (type of intervention, qualification of the intervention provider, setting, monotherapy/augmentation), main findings. Finally, the quality of each RCT was scored using the Jadad modified scale,1 QED and NE were scored on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (see text footnote 1). The Jadad modified (maximum 8 points) is a scale which assess the quality of studies (randomization, double-blinding, withdrawals and dropouts, inclusion and exclusion criteria, statistical analyses used) (see text footnote 1). The NOS (maximum 9 points) is a scale used for assessing the quality of QES and NE evaluating selection and comparability of cohorts and assessment of outcome (24).
In order to estimate the effect size of each single intervention, we calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs to assess depression severity across different depression scales. We used Hedges' adjusted g statistic to calculate SMDs (it is very similar to Cohen's d statistic, but includes an adjustment for small sample bias). Standard mean differences were calculated using RevMan 5.4.
Results
Study Selection and Characteristics
According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria described above, the review eventually included 56 full text articles; according to the type of intervention, studies were grouped in the following areas: horticulture/gardening (n = 3), pet therapy (n = 4), physical exercise (n = 9), psychoeducation/rehabilitation (n = 15), psychotherapy (n = 3), reminiscence and story sharing (n = 14), miscellaneous (n = 8, for those studies which did not seem to match any of the previous categories) (See the Synthesized findings section below for more details).
Sample size varied from 5 to 403 participants (we decided not to include case studies with <5 participants) and eligibility criteria were highly heterogeneous as well. Regarding methodological approach, 93% (n = 52) of the studies examined by this review were either Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT, n = 30), or had a Quasi-Experimental Design (QED, n = 22); 4 studies were had a Non-Experimental design (NE).
Regarding validated psychometric measures, the GDS was the most used one in the studies included in the current review in its 30-item version (25–37), but even more in its short (15-item) version (22, 23, 38–59).
Most of the studies considered in our systematic review were performed in the Asian continent (41%); with more detail, 14 articles were from Taiwan (21, 30, 32, 36, 49, 50, 52, 57, 58, 60–64). The other studies were distributed as follows: n = 13 in Europe (33, 38–40, 43, 47, 54, 59, 65–69), n = 17 in America (25, 27–29, 31, 34, 35, 41, 44, 48, 70–76), n = 3 in Oceania (26, 42, 77); no study was performed in Africa. All the articles dealing with horticulture were conducted in the Asian continent, while 75% of the articles dealing with pet therapy came from Italy (38–40).
Regarding treatment duration, although data were missing in some studies, interventions lasted mostly for 4–8 weeks. With more detail, 13 studies (21, 22, 27, 39, 44, 45, 52, 54, 55, 63, 68, 71, 77) described 8 weeks interventions. Exceptions were the Llewellyn-Jones et al. (26) and the Leontjevas et al. (66) studies, which included an assessment after 9.5 and 20 months, respectively. Usually, treatment sessions had a weekly frequency, higher in some studies (2/week) (38, 39, 44), (3/week) (61, 65) and lasted 30 to 60 min (21, 27, 41, 45, 47, 48, 53, 57, 59, 77).
As far as treatment delivery is concerned, interventions were administrated by external experts (23, 26–30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 43–47, 50–52, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62–65, 68, 70–74) or trained staff (31), and in many cases by experts, together with the involvement of staff members (21, 22, 32, 38, 40, 48, 49, 53, 56, 66, 67, 69, 77). Apparently, the cooperation/involvement of an external expert had no impact on treatment effectiveness. In some cases, it was not specified whether treatment was delivered by an external expert or trained member of the staff (25, 42, 76).
Tables 1–7 summarize the main features of the studies included in the review process: sample (Number–intervention group IG control group CG, Age, Gender W, Drop Out rate), study design, residential type, measures for dementia, measures for depression, intervention (-type, -individual or group setting, -professionals involved, -monotherapy or augmentation), duration and timing of treatment, main findings and quality rate (Jadad and NOS). We grouped studies according to intervention type as follows: horticulture/gardening, pets, physical exercise, psychoeducative/rehabilitation interventions, psychotherapy, reminiscence and story sharing, miscellaneous).
Table 1. Horticulture and gardening studies (n 3 articles).
Synthesized Findings
Horticulture and Gardening
Three studies on horticulture/gardening were included in our systematic review (Table 1). These focused both on physical well-being and on the effects of increased social interaction involved in the activity itself. One study (21) described a significant decrease (i.e., an improvement) in the mean scores for depression in the experimental group, and the opposite in the control group (SMD −15.21; CI 95% −16.98 to −13.44). The randomized controlled trial by Lai et al. (22) highlighted a significant effect of the intervention from a subjective perspective (increased subjective happiness), but not from an objective one (GDS score). Last, the study by Park et al. (23) failed to observe any change in depression scores in elderly women living in Korean nursing homes, and a worsening of depression scores (from normal scores to moderate depression) in the control group during the observation period. SMDs, CI 95% are reported in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1.
Pet Therapy
Four studies on pet therapy were included in our systematic review (Table 2); pets were dogs in 3 of them and cats in one (38). Three of these studies (38–40) showed an improvement of elderly patients' depressive symptoms, while no significant change in the GDS score was found in Phelps' sample (5 patients) (41). With more detail, Ambrosi et al. (40) highlighted that dog assisted therapy could reduce depressive symptoms in elderly people by facilitation of social interactions and consequent elicitation of a positive emotional response (SMD −1.39; CI 95% −2.22 to −0.56). SMDs, CI 95% and further details are reported in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2.
Table 2. Pet therapy studies (n 4 articles).
Physical Exercise
Nine studies dealt with physical exercise, including different approaches and exercise programmes (Table 3).
Table 3. Physical exercise studies (n 9 articles).
As reported in Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Figure 3, Coelho et al. (65) (SMD −0.90; CI 95% −1.56 to −0.24), De Carvalho Bastone and Filho (25) (SMD −0.82; CI 95% −1.49 to −0.14), Brown et al. (IG1 vs. IG2) (42) (SMD −0.77; CI 95% −1.18 to −0.36 in GDS score, SMD −0.56; CI 95% −0.97 to −0.15 in PANAS-P score), Chen et al. (60) at 3 month follow-up (SMD −0.75; CI 95% −1.11 to −0.39), Chen et al. at 6 month follow-up (SMD −0.68; CI 95% −1.04 to −0.32) (60), Chen et al. at 6 month follow-up (SMD −0.63; CI 95% −1.18 to −0.09) (61) showed a significant improvement in depression after exercise interventions. The intervention used by those studies were: wheelchair-bound senior elastic band (60), music plus movement (65), Yoga (61), mobility, strengthening, closed-kinetic chain, walk, and relaxation (25).
On the other hand, the effectiveness of Wii Fit (44) or Qui gong exercise (45) remain uncertain on participants' level of depression.
Psychoeducational and Rehabilitation Interventions
Fifteen studies on psychoeducational and rehabilitation interventions were included in our systematic review (Table 4). The interventions in this group were performed in individual or group setting, either self-managed after training or managed by experienced staff. Among the heterogeneous interventions described, several authors reported a positive effect on depressive symptoms (26–33, 46, 62, 66, 71, 72). The types of psychoeducational/rehabilitation interventions assessed included: 8 week sessions of writing group (45); training, education and activity programmes for residents as well as for physicians and carers (26); a mixed intervention including different activities with a recreation therapist (27); an individualized psychosocial intervention carried out by a volunteer and a nurse (28); mentoring English conversational activity (29); self-worth therapy managed by a trained mental health nurse (30); a program of pleasant event activities (31); videoconference interaction with relatives (32); “friendly visits” problem-solving treatment (72); a specific multidisciplinary care program (66); a Socially Supportive Activities Program intervention (62); facility adaptation promotion program (46); nurse-led sleep program (33).
Table 4. Psychoeducative/Rehabilitation Interventions studies (n 15 articles).
Sok (SMD −2.73; CI 95% −3.37 to −2.08) (46); Hsu and Wang (SMD −1.51 CI 95% −2.02 to −1.01) (52), Dolu and Nahcivan (8 weeks follow up SMD −1.34; CI 95% −1.98 to −0.70; 12 weeks follow up SMD −1.20; CI 95% −1.85 to −0.56) (33) showed larger positive effect.
Effect sizes for each study arm are reported in Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Figure 4.
Two out of these 15 studies failed to find significant changes in depressive symptoms: the study by Dozeman et al. (67), about a guided self-help course, and that by Cesetti et al. (47), dealing with a narrative group intervention.
Psychotherapy
Three studies on cognitive-behavior psychotherapy were included in the review (Table 5). Two of them supported its effectiveness on depression (34, 48), while one did not (77).
Table 5. Psychotherapy studies (n 3 articles).
SMDs for each study arm are reported in Supplementary Table 5 and Supplementary Figure 5.
Reminiscence and Story Sharing
Our review included 14 studies on reminiscence and story sharing (Table 6). Reminiscence, life review and story sharing yielded significant results on depression in 12 studies (35–37, 49–54, 63, 73, 74) while two recent RCTs (68, 75) failed to find a significant effect of the reminiscence therapy intervention on depressive symptoms.
Table 6. Reminiscence and Story Sharing studies (n 14 articles).
SMDs are reported in Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Figure 6.
Miscellaneous
In the miscellaneous group we included 8 studies about different and heterogeneous approaches which did not seem to fit any of the above-described categories (Table 7).
Table 7. Miscellaneous articles (n 8 articles).
These miscellaneous interventions were: a pilot study regarding wheel prayer group activity (76); gero-transcendence, a particular form of transcendence intervention (55); Han et al.'s laugh protocol (56), a 1 month intervention program of trans-cutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) (57); a group activity based on ICT (using app for instant communications on electronic devices) Chiu and Wu (58); music therapy (59, 64).
One study focused on the cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care program to prevent depression and anxiety in elderly homes (69).
All these miscellaneous interventions yielded some results, except for the one by Biasutti and Mangiacotti (59) and that by Bosmans et al. (69), which was neither cost-effective nor successful in preventing depression.
SMDs are reported in Supplementary Table 7 and Supplementary Figure 7.
Study Quality Assessment
The overall quality of RCTs was assessed with the Jadad; QED and NE studies were assessed using NOS and resulted quite poor (some studies involving small samples and/or with a poor methodological approach). The results regarding studies quality were consistent with those reported by the previous review by Simning and Simons (9) which highlighted an overall lack of quality of the studies in the field (using the Jadad scale).
Discussion
Summary of Main Findings
The aim of this systematic review was to assess interventions focused on depression in elderly with no or mild cognitive impairment living in LTCFs. To our knowledge, three previous literature reviews (8, 9, 78) focused on depression among older people living in LCTFs and Nursing Homes and were performed with an approach which was similar to our own (at least as far as inclusion criteria and methods are concerned), albeit not totally overlapping. Simning and Simons (9) and Yoon et al. (8) included studies on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions (psychotherapeutic, recreational, psychosocial and pharmacologic or other biologic interventions). Davison et al. (78) focused on psychological treatments in older adults living in LTCFs, but included those with a diagnosis of dementia or other comorbidities as well. Furthermore, they excluded rehabilitation and exercise-related activities and limited their review to reminiscence and life review interventions. Hence these review works eventually included different types of studies.
Studies included in the current review were highly heterogeneous as regards type, intervention methodology (duration, sessions number and frequency, setting -individual or group), number of participants, eligibility criteria, professional performing the intervention (members of the LTCF internal staff or external expert), type of residential facility.
Furthermore, as already reported by previous reviews (9, 78), regrettably the studies available in the literature define depression criteria to a limited degree only. They usually lack a clinical diagnosis on behalf of an experienced psychiatrist; furthermore, most of the studies included in our review did not consider lifetime history of depression, comorbid medical illnesses or concomitant psychopharmacological treatments.
Most studies consider the decrease in depressive symptomatology level (investigated by validated psychometric questionnaires) as study outcome. Nonetheless, the assessment of changes in a depression rating scale score could not provide enough information about real mental health and clinical depression before and after intervention. The assessment of an actual improvement or remission of depression would imply a psychiatric interview and clinical instruments for diagnosis according to DSM or ICD criteria (78); actually, a clinical psychiatric assessment was one of the activities proposed by the stepped care approach in Leontjevas et al. (66).
The overall duration (weeks) of the intervention delivered seemed to have a greater impact on treatment effectiveness than the duration of each single session.
Forty-one percent of the studies considered in our systematic review were performed in the Asian continent; we can hypothesize that the rate of older adults in a given country, its cultural context, the perception of and the approach to aging might play a role from this standpoint. All these issues may eventually lead to differences in the attention paid to different types of non-pharmacological treatment for depressed elderly. For example, horticultures interventions were conducted only in the Asian continent, while most (75%) of the articles dealing with pet therapy come from Italy (38–40). This result can be related to the more holistic and spiritual vision of the Asian culture, characterized by a thorough approach including body, mind and spirit (79) and spirituality (80), which can increase Asian researchers' interest in non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches for elderly's depression.
Summarizing the main findings from the current review, most of the included studies seemed to suggest some kind of effectiveness of the proposed intervention on depression. Through our systematic literature review we were able to identify seven types of intervention, and in each one there are effective interventions with different effect sizes. Nonetheless, variability in sample size and eligibility criteria makes it difficult to compare results from different studies and to draw clear conclusions. Differences in participants' mean age, and even more, the choice to include/exclude soft or mild cognitive impairment, certainly affected the research findings. Due to this kind of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed; nonetheless, physical exercise, psychotherapy, and reminiscence interventions (see Supplementary Tables 3, 5, 6 and Supplementary Figures 3, 5, 6, respectively), seem to be the most effective interventions.
Furthermore, as described also by Simning and Simons (9), LTCFs constitute a widely heterogeneous context, spanning from low-level dependency to high-level dependency facilities, and hence offering different types of assistance. Regarding the populations involved in the studies we assessed, one more methodological limitation could be participants' selection: in many studies the sample was randomized, while in other studies sampling was largely dependent on type of LTCF, setting, population and residents' willingness to participate to the proposed intervention.
While the Yoon and co-workers' (8) review emphasized the importance of providing individualized treatments, no specific focus on individualization emerged from the articles included in the current review. Another limitation, which is inherent the specific population and setting we investigated, was about the frequency of drop out and the possibility for participants to complete the follow-up. Thus, the results should be considered with caution, in the light of the several limitations which are further detailed below.
Limitations
Some limitations of the current review should be underscored. We selected articles in English language only, which can potentially exclude relevant results published in other languages. We decided to focus on depressed elderly and excluded studies involving those with a severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score <20), which represent only a portion of the global elderly population. Despite mixed or negative findings in some cases, most studies included in this systematic review reported that the non-pharmacological interventions they assessed seemed effective in the management of depressed elderly in the LTCFs context. Nonetheless, making a clear decision about their actual effectiveness is difficult as data reported are very varied, and the populations involved in the studies are varied as well, and sometimes poorly defined. Regrettably, this fact together with the limitations and heterogeneity of the studies described above, hinder the possibility to draw clear conclusions about the actual effectiveness of the interventions analyzed in the papers (78). Despite the limitations described above, we believe that the current review adds to the existing literature as it tried to focus as much as possible on not severely cognitively impaired depressed elderly, selecting studies involving participants with a MMSE score > 20; furthermore, it proposes a categorization of the types of non-pharmacological treatment offered in the context of LTCFs, and includes an accurate analysis of studies quality and effect size of the results obtained.
Conclusions
Non-pharmacological interventions for the management and treatment of depression in the elderly population could be an important strategy, as this population could be particularly frail and sensitive with regard to pharmacological interventions as a consequence of comorbid medical problems, concomitant drug therapies, different drug metabolism, higher probability of side effects.
Nonetheless, as described in the limitations section, the possibility to generalize results or to draw clear conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions is limited. Further methodologically sound studies paying more attention on eligibility criteria, diagnosis, history comorbidity and medications are required to better understand whether a specific type of non-pharmacological intervention should be recommended for depressed elderly in LTCFs.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author Contributions
PZ, CG, and MP conceived the study. Review methodology was developed by PZ, CG, MP, and DC. DM and EG performed the database searches and article selection. CG supervised the process. DM, EG, and CG drafted the manuscript. DM, DC, CR, EG, and CG revised the manuscript according to the review's suggestion. All authors revised the draft and contributed with important intellectual content.
Funding
This study was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) program Departments of Excellence 2018–2022, AGING Project – Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.685860/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
AAI, animal assisted intervention; AERS, Apparent Emotional Rating Scale; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II; BHS, Beck Hopelessness Scale; BOMCT, Brief Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test; BSI, Beck Suicide Ideation Scale; BTOT, Benton Temporal Orientation Test; CES-D, Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CSDD, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; DASS 21, 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale; DAT, Dog-assisted Therapy; DI, Depression Inventory; DS, Geriatric Depression Screening Scale; ESC, Emotional Symptom Checklist; GDS-30, 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS-15, 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS8, 8-item Geriatric Depression Scale; HAM-D, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; HS, Hopelessness scale; ICT, information and communications technology; LSI-A, Life Satisfaction Index A; MINI, Mini international neuropsychiatric interview; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; MPCR, Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices; MSQ, Mental Status Questionnaire; NE, Non-experimental; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; PANAS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9; PROMIS, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression scale; QED, Quasi Experimental Design; RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial; SCID, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; SMMTE, Standardized Mini-Mental Test Examination; SPMSQ, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; TDQ, Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire.
Footnotes
1. ^Modified Jadad Scale. Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
References
1. WHO. Mental Health of Older Adults. (2017). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-adults (accessed Jebruary 01, 2021).
2. Cummings SM. Predictors of psychological well-being among assisted living residents. Health Soc Work. (2002) 27:293–302. doi: 10.1093/hsw/27.4.293
3. Teresi J, Abrams R, Holmes D, Ramirez M, Eimicke J. Prevalence of depression and depression recognition in nursing homes. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2001) 36:613–20. doi: 10.1007/s127-001-8202-7
4. Alexopoulos GS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. (2005) 365:1961–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66665-2
5. Beekman ATF, Geerlings SW, Deeg DJH, Smit JH, Schoevers RS, de Beurs E, et al. The natural history of late-life depression: a 6-year prospective study in the community. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2002) 59:605–11. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.7.605
6. Fiske A, Wetherell JL, Gatz M. Depression in older adults. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2009) 5:363–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153621
7. Vaughan L, Corbin AL, Goveas JS. Depression and frailty in later life: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. (2015) 201:1947–58. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S69632
8. Yoon S, Moon, SS, Pitner R. Effective treatments of late-life depression in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. Res Soc Work Pract. (2018) 28:116–30. doi: 10.1177/1049731515621165
9. Simning A, Simons KV. Treatment of depression in nursing home residents without significant cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. (2017) 29:209–26. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001733
10. Allan CL, Ebmeier KP. Review of treatment for late-life depression. Adv Psychiatr Treat. (2013) 19:302–9. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.112.010835
11. Thompson LW, Gallagher D, Breckenridge JS. Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies for depressed elders. J Consult Clin Psychol. (1987) 55:385–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.3.385
12. Arean PA, Perri MG, Nezu AM, Schein RL, Christopher F, Joseph TX. Comparative effectiveness of social problem-solving therapy and reminiscence therapy as treatments for depression in older adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. (1993) 61:1003–10. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.1003
13. Hsieh HF Wang JJ. Effect of reminiscence therapy on depression in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. (2003) 40:335–45. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00101-3
14. Honn Qualls S, Knight BG. Psychotherapy for Depression in Older Adults. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2006). p. 288.
15. Haight BK, Burnside I. Reminiscence and life review: explaining the differences. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (1993) 7:91–8. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9417(09)90007-3
16. Chang CH, Liu CY, Chen SJ, Tsai HC. Efficacy of light therapy on nonseasonal depression among elderly adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2018) 14:3091–102. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S180321
17. Daykin N, Mansfield L, Meads C, Julier G, Tomlinson A, Payne A, et al. What works for wellbeing? A systematic review of wellbeing outcomes for music and singing in adults. Perspect Public Health. (2018) 138:39–46. doi: 10.1177/1757913917740391
18. Gee NR, Mueller MK. A systematic review of research on pet ownership and animal interactions among older adults. Anthrozoös. (2019) 32:183–207. doi: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1569903
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
20. Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. (2006) 2006:359–63.
21. Chu HY, Chen MF, Tsai CC, Chan HS, Wu TL. Efficacy of a horticultural activity program for reducing depression and loneliness in older residents of nursing homes in Taiwan. Geriatr Nurs. (2019) 40:386–91. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.12.012
22. Lai CKY, Kwan RYC, Lo SKL, Fung CYY, Lau JKH, Tse MMY. Effects of horticulture on frail and prefrail nursing home residents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2018) 19:696–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.002
23. Park SA, Lee AY, Son KC, Lee WL, Kim DS. Gardening intervention for physical and psychological health benefits in elderly women at community centers. HortTechnology. (2016) 26:474–83. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.26.4.474
24. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
25. De Carvalho Bastone A, Filho JW. Effect of an exercise program on functional performance of institutionalized elderly. J Rehabil Res Dev. (2004) 41:659–68. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.01.0014
26. Llewellyn-Jones RH, Baikie KA, Smithers H, Cohen J, Snowdon J, Tennant CC. Multifaceted shared care intervention for late life depression in residential care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (1999) 11:319:676–82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.676
27. Rosen J, Rogers JC, Marin RS, Mulsant BH, Shahar A, Reynolds CF III. Control-relevant intervention in the treatment of minor and major depression in a long-term care facility. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (1997) 5:247–57. doi: 10.1097/00019442-199700530-00009
28. McCurren C, Dowe D, Rattle D, Looney S. Depression among nursing home elders: testing an intervention strategy. Appl Nurs Res. (1999) 12:185–95. doi: 10.1016/S0897-1897(99)80249-3
29. Yuen HK, Huang P, Burik JK, Smith TG. Impact of participating in volunteer activities for residents living in long-term-care facilities. Am J Occup Ther. (2008) 62:71–6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.1.71
30. Tsai YF, Wong TK, Tsai HH, Ku YC. Self-worth therapy for depressive symptoms in older nursing home residents. J Adv Nurs. (2008) 64:488–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04804.x
31. Cernin P, Lichtenberg P. Behavioral treatment for depressed mood: a pleasant events intervention for seniors residing in assisted living. Clin Gerontol. (2009) 32:324–31. doi: 10.1080/07317110902896547
32. Tsai HH, Tsai YF. Changes in depressive symptoms, social support, and loneliness over 1 year after a minimum 3-month videoconference program for older nursing home residents. J Med Internet Re. (2011) 15:13:e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1678
33. Dolu I, Nahcivan NO. Impact of a nurse-led sleep programme on the sleep quality and depressive symptomatology among older adults in nursing homes: a non-randomised controlled study. Int J Older People Nurs. (2019) 14:e12215. doi: 10.1111/opn.12215
34. Konnert C, Dobson K, Stelmach L. The prevention of depression in nursing home residents: a randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Aging Ment Health. (2009) 13:288–99. doi: 10.1080/13607860802380672
35. Jones ED. Reminiscence therapy for older women with depression. Effects of nursing intervention classification in assisted-living long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. (2003) 29:26–33. 56–7. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20030701-07
36. Chueh KH, Chang TY. Effectiveness of group reminiscence therapy for depressive symptoms in male veterans: 6-month follow-up. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2014) 29:377–83. doi: 10.1002/gps.4013
37. Hamzehzadeh M, Golzari M, Rafiemanesh H, Meshki V, Abdolalizadeh M, Hoseini L, et al. Investigating the effectiveness of reminiscence therapy on of elderlies depression and optimism: an experiment study. Prensa Med Argent. (2018) 104:6. doi: 10.41720032/745X.1000318
38. Stasi MF, Amati D, Costa C, Resta D, Senepa G, Scarafioiti C, et al. Pet-therapy: a trial for institutionalized frail elderly patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl. (2004) 407–12. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.052
39. Sollami A, Gianferrari E, Alfieri M, Artioli G, Taffurelli C. Pet therapy: an effective strategy to care for the elderly? An experimental study in a nursing home. Acta Biomed. (2017) 88:25–31.
40. Ambrosi C, Zaiontz C, Peragine G, Sarchi S, Bona F. Randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy on depression, anxiety, and illness perception in institutionalized elderly. Psychogeriatrics. (2019) 19:55–64. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12367
41. Phelps K, Miltenberger R, Jens T, Wadeson H. An investigation of the effects of dog visits on depression, mood, and social interaction in elderly individuals living in a nursing home. Behav Interv. (2008) 23:181–200. doi: 10.1002/bin.263
42. Brown AK, Liu-Ambrose T, Tate R, Lord SR. The effect of group-based exercise on cognitive performance and mood in seniors residing in intermediate care and self-care retirement facilities: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. (2009) 43:608–14. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.049882
43. Vankova H, Holmerova I, Machacova K, Volicer L, Veleta P, Celko AM. The effect of dance on depressive symptoms in nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2014) 15:582–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.013
44. Chao YY, Scherer Y, Montgomery C, Lucke K, Wu YW. Exergames-based intervention for assisted living residents: a pilot study. J Gerontol Nurs. (2014) 40:1–7. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140407-04
45. Roswiyani R, Hiew CH, Witteman CLM, Satiadarma MP, Spijker J. Art activities and qigong exercise for the well-being of older adults in nursing homes in Indonesia: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Ment Health. (2020) 24:1569–78. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1617239
46. Sok SR. Effects of facility adaptation promotion program for Korean older adults in nursing home. Iran J Public Health. (2019) 48:2041–9. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v48i11.3523
47. Cesetti G, Vescovelli F, Ruini C. The promotion of well-being in aging individuals living in nursing homes: a controlled pilot intervention with narrative strategies. Clin Gerontol. (2017) 40:380–91. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1292979
48. Hyer L, Yeager CA, Hilton N, Sacks A. Group, individual, and staff therapy: an efficient and effective cognitive behavioral therapy in long-term care. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. (2008) 23:528–39. doi: 10.1177/1533317508323571
49. Chao SY, Liu HY, Wu CY, Jin SF, Chu TL, Huang TS, et al. The effects of group reminiscence therapy on depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction of elderly nursing home residents. J Nurs Res. (2006) 14:36–45. doi: 10.1097/01.JNR.0000387560.03823.c7
50. Chuang HW, Kao CW, Lee MD, Chang YC. Effectiveness of story-centred care intervention program in older persons living in long-term care facilities: a randomized, longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0194178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194178
51. Lan X, Xiao H, Chen Y. Life review for Chinese older adults in nursing homes: cultural acceptance and its effects. Int Psychogeriatr. (2019) 31:527–35. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001084
52. Hsu YC, Wang JJ. Physical, affective, and behavioral effects of group reminiscence on depressed institutionalized elders in Taiwan. Nurs Res. (2009) 58:294–9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181a308ee
53. Karimi H, Dolatshahee B, Momeni K, Khodabakhshi A, Rezaei M, Kamrani AA. Effectiveness of integrative and instrumental reminiscence therapies on depression symptoms reduction in institutionalized older adults: an empirical study. Aging Ment Health. (2010) 14:881–7. doi: 10.1080/13607861003801037
54. Meléndez-Moral JC, Charco-Ruiz L, Mayordomo-Rodríguez T, Sales-Galán A. Effects of a reminiscence program among institutionalized elderly adults. Psicothema. (2013) 25:319–23. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2012.253
55. Wang JJ, Lin YH, Hsieh LY. Effects of gerotranscendence support group on gerotranscendence perspective, depression, and life satisfaction of institutionalized elders. Aging Ment Health. (2011) 1:15:580–6. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.543663
56. Han JH, Park K, Park H. Effects of Laughter Therapy on Depression and Sleep among Patients at Long-term Care Hospitals. Korean J Adult Nurs. (2017) 29:560–68. doi: 10.7475/kjan.2017.29.5.560
57. Chang SH, Fang MC, Yang YS. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for improving depressive mood status among nursing home elders in Taiwan: a pilot study. Geriatr Nurs. (2010) 31:324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2010.03.001
58. Chiu CJ, Wu CH. Information and communications technology as a health promotion method for older adults in assisted-living facilities: three-arm group-randomized trial. JMIR Aging. (2019) 2:e12633. doi: 10.2196/12633
59. Biasutti M, Mangiacotti A. Music training improves depressed mood symptoms in elderly people: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Aging Hum Dev. (2021) 92:115–33. doi: 10.1177/0091415019893988
60. Chen KM, Huang HT, Cheng YY, Li CH, Chang YH. Sleep quality and depression of nursing home older adults in wheelchairs after exercises. Nurs Outlook. (2015) 63:357–65. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.08.010
61. Chen KM, Chen MH, Lin MH, Fan JT, Lin HS, Li CH. Effects of yoga on sleep quality and depression in elders in assisted living facilities. J Nurs Res. (2010) 18:53–61. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0b013e3181ce5189
62. Hsu YC, Wright CL. The effects of a Socially Supportive Activities Program (SSAP) on mood in long term care: a pilot study. Geriatr Nurs. (2019) 40:572–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.05.009
63. Chiang KJ, Chu H, Chang HJ, Chung MH, Chen CH, Chiou HY, et al. The effects of reminiscence therapy on psychological well-being, depression, and loneliness among the institutionalized aged. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2010) 25:380–8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2350
64. Tai SY, Wang LC, Yang YH. Effect of music intervention on the cognitive and depression status of senior apartment residents in Taiwan. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2015) 11:1449–54. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S82572
65. Coelho E, Mota M, Fonseca S, Matos A, Carvalhal MI. Exercise with music: an innovative approach to increase cognition and reduce depression in institutionalized elderly. Rev Psicol Deporte. (2020) 29:49–56.
66. Leontjevas R, Gerritsen DL, Smalbrugge M, Teerenstra S, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Koopmans RT. A structural multidisciplinary approach to depression management in nursing-home residents: a multicentre, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. (2013) 381:2255–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60590-5
67. Dozeman E, van Schaik DJ, van Marwijk HW, Stek ML, Beekman AT, van der Horst HE. Feasibility and effectiveness of activity-scheduling as a guided self-help intervention for the prevention of depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the elderly: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Int Psychogeriatr. (2011) 23:969–78. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211000202
68. Westerhof GJ, Korte J, Eshuis S, Bohlmeijer ET. Precious memories: a randomized controlled trial on the effects of an autobiographical memory intervention delivered by trained volunteers in residential care homes. Aging Ment Health. (2018) 22:1494–501. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1376311
69. Bosmans JE, Dozeman E, van Marwijk HW, van Schaik DJ, Stek ML, Beekman AT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care programme to prevent depression and anxiety in residents in homes for the older people: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2014) 29:182–90. doi: 10.1002/gps.3987
70. Winningham R, Anunsen R, Hanson LM, Laux L, Kaus KD, Reifers A. MemAerobics: a cognitive intervention to improve memory ability and reduce depression in older adults. J Ment Health Aging. (2003) 9:183–92.
71. Supiano KP, Ozminkowski RJ, Campbell R, Lapidos C. Effectiveness of writing groups in nursing homes. J Appl Gerontol. (1989) 8:382–97. doi: 10.1177/073346488900800308
72. Reinhardt JP, Horowitz A, Cimarolli VR, Eimicke JP, Teresi JA. Addressing depression in a long-term care setting: a phase II pilot of problem-solving treatment. Clin Ther. (2014) 36:1531–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.005
73. Haight BK, Michel Y, Hendrix S. The extended effects of the life review in nursing home residents. Int J Aging Hum Dev. (2000) 50:151–68. doi: 10.2190/QU66-E8UV-NYMR-Y99E
74. Zauszniewski J, Eggenschwiler K, Preechawong S, Chung CW, Airey T, Wilke P, et al. Focused reflection reminiscence group for elders: implementation and evaluation. J Appl Gerontol. (2004) 23:429–42. doi: 10.1177/0733464804270852
75. Sullivan GJ, Hain DJ, Williams C, Newman D. Story-sharing intervention to improve depression and well-being in older adults transitioning to long-term care. Res Gerontol Nurs. (2019) 12:81–90. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20190124-01
76. Rajagopal D, Mackenzie E, Bailey C, Lavizzo-Mourey R. The Effectiveness of a Spiritually-Based Intervention to Alleviate Subsyndromal Anxiety and Minor Depression Among Older Adults. J Relig Health. (2002) 41:153–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1015854226937
77. Blair AC, Bird MJ. A pilot trial of psychological therapy groups for the very old in residential care: clinical and logistical issues. Clin Psychol. (2016) 2:68–79. doi: 10.1111/cp.12031
78. Davison TE, You E, Doyle C, Bhar S, Wells Y, Flicker L. Psychological therapies for depression in older adults residing in long-term care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 2018:CD013059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013059
79. Chin JL. Review of Asian culture and psychotherapy: implications for East and West. Cult Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. (2006) 12:592–4. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.12.3.592
Keywords: aging, elderly, depression, treatment, long term care facility, nursing home, systematic review
Citation: Gramaglia C, Gattoni E, Marangon D, Concina D, Grossini E, Rinaldi C, Panella M and Zeppegno P (2021) Non-pharmacological Approaches to Depressed Elderly With No or Mild Cognitive Impairment in Long-Term Care Facilities. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front. Public Health 9:685860. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.685860
Received: 26 March 2021; Accepted: 17 June 2021;
Published: 16 July 2021.
Edited by:
Barna Konkoly-Thege, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, CanadaReviewed by:
Kevin Manning, University of Connecticut, United StatesEivind Aakhus, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Norway
Copyright © 2021 Gramaglia, Gattoni, Marangon, Concina, Grossini, Rinaldi, Panella and Zeppegno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Patrizia Zeppegno, patrizia.zeppegno@med.uniupo.it
†These authors have contributed equally to this work