Corrigendum: Advances on self-regulation models: A new research agenda through the SR vs ER behavior theory in different psychology contexts
- 1School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
- 2Emergency Response Department Science and Technology, Health Protection Directorate, Public Health England, Salisbury, United Kingdom
- 3School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom
- 4School of Psychology, Politics, and Sociology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
A Corrigendum on
Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach
by Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Tekin Guven, S., and Amlôt, R. (2019). Front. Public Health 7:141. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141
There is an error in the Funding statement. The correct number for “Economic and Social Research Council” is “RES-000-23-0446.”
Additionally, in the original article, we neglected to include the data-sets for empirical papers used in this review. A Data Availability Statement has therefore been added to the article text:
“The datasets analyzed for this study can be found in the UK Data Service SN: 5987, http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5987-1.”
Lastly, the number for footnote 5 was incorrectly positioned. It should be positioned at the last paragraph of subsection Keep the Disaster Community Alive and not in the last paragraph of the previous subsection. A correction has therefore been made to move the footnote to the correct position.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: collective resilience, social identity, crowds, emergency, disaster, guidance
Citation: Drury J, Carter H, Cocking C, Ntontis E, Tekin Guven S and Amlôt R (2019) Corrigendum: Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach. Front. Public Health 7:181. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00181
Received: 13 June 2019; Accepted: 14 June 2019;
Published: 27 June 2019.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2019 Drury, Carter, Cocking, Ntontis, Tekin Guven and Amlôt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John Drury, j.drury@sussex.ac.uk