EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychiatry, 23 April 2025

Sec. Psychopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1600812

This article is part of the Research TopicBeyond Psilocybin: Exploring the Clinical Potential of Alternative and Novel PsychedelicsView all 8 articles

Editorial: Beyond psilocybin: exploring the clinical potential of alternative and novel psychedelics

  • 1Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
  • 2Psychedelic Research in Science & Medicine (PRISM), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 3Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • 4Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • 5Psilera Inc., Tampa, FL, United States

Psychedelic research has flourished over the past fifteen years (1, 2), following several decades in the political – and medical - wilderness. Psilocin, generally administered as its prodrug, psilocybin, is seen as a prototype of the so-called “classic psychedelics”, playing a leading role in recent clinical trials investigating psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of a range of mental health conditions (3, 4), as well as fundamental research into brain function and consciousness (5).

Strategically, the current wave of psychedelic research commenced with psilocybin primarily because it was relatively unfamiliar both to regulators and to the public and hence lacked the sociopolitical baggage of the potent and widely known trailblazer, LSD (6). Psilocybin also offered the perceived advantages over LSD of being a natural product with a relatively short duration of action and a lower potential for adverse psychological effects in therapeutic contexts (7).

However, psilocybin is but one of scores of compounds belonging to two main chemical classes – phenethylamines and tryptamines - along with ergolines and an expanding array of other (mostly heterocyclic) alkaloids - that act as agonists of the serotonin 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C and 5-HT1A receptors responsible for the various phenomenological and putative therapeutic effects of classic psychedelics (8). In addition, attention is turning to other compounds within the broader class now known as “psychoplastogens”, that do not elicit the characteristic phenomenological effects associated with psychedelics but nonetheless show promise as pharmacotherapeutic agents through promotion of neuroplasticity (9).

While psilocybin has proved to be an excellent “gateway psychedelic” for clinical research, showing efficacy in the treatment of a range of mental health conditions, a range of properties – physicochemical, pharmacological, and phenomenological - could be varied and optimized to extend the application of psychedelic therapies to broader patient populations and conditions.

Thus, there is clear potential to be explored among the many alternatives to psilocybin. These include legacy psychedelics such as mescaline, N,N-dimethyltryptamine (N,N-DMT), and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT), plus a range of analogs created in the latter half of the 20th century and a suite of entirely novel compounds emerging more recently through the efforts of a new generation of researchers working in academia and within a burgeoning community of small biotech enterprises.

In launching this Research Topic, we believed the time to be ripe for a focused discussion of the intrinsic interest and therapeutic potential of psychedelics that exist “beyond psilocybin”. Consequently, seven articles were published in this Research Topic, covering perspectives, preclinical research, and human studies of established and emerging psychedelics for the treatment of mental health conditions ranging from depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to anxiety in the context of palliative care.

Two case reports kick off the Research Topic. Reissmann et al. present a single-case study of a personalized dose regimen of repeated ketamine infusion for the treatment of major depressive disorder, discussing some of the insights gained in the context of maintaining altered states of consciousness (ASCs). Noting the lack of published research investigating possible associations between ASCs and the antidepressant properties of ketamine, the authors query whether the persistence of recurring ASCs in the course of repeated ketamine infusions is necessary for the maintenance of its demonstrated antidepressant effects.

Ragnhildstveit et al. provide a report of their longitudinal study of the treatment of PTSD in one patient using vaporized 5-MeO-DMT. This compound is emerging as a promising classic psychedelic that offers the potential benefits of short duration of acute effects and a somewhat distinct pharmacological profile that features 5-HT1A receptor agonism over the 5-HT2A/2C activity predominantly exerted by psilocybin and other classic psychedelics. While much remains to be elucidated through clinical studies currently underway, 5-MeO-DMT may hold a key to the exploration of subtle differences among classic psychedelics for the treatment of mental health conditions.

A comprehensive article by Tasker et al. reviews the subclass of clavine alkaloids in the context of the complex pharmacology of related ergolines, including their most historically noteworthy exemplar, LSD. While lacking the carboxyl group of the lysergic acid amides, the closely related clavines nonetheless display significant activity at the 5-HT2 receptors of interest to psychedelic research, alongside affinities to a broad range of monoamine and other receptors that contribute to the fascinating pharmacology of ergot alkaloids and their derivatives.

Moving to clinical trials, the report by Aicher et al. of their Phase 1 RCT of an ayahuasca analog in healthy subjects details acute and persisting effects following the administration of harmine (a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, MAO-I) as orodispersible tablets, followed by intranasally administered DMT at incremental dosages. While administration of an MAO-I facilitates the oral activity of DMT, it also extends the duration of the effects of DMT when administered by parenteral routes. This early-phase trial in healthy humans leads the way to future trials of this and similar approaches to administering DMT to clinical populations.

Meanwhile, James et al. report on an industry-led study of a novel DMT fumarate formulation in healthy participants, likewise leading the way to future trials in clinical populations. Without the inhibitory effects of an MAO inhibitor such as harmine, DMT must be administered parenterally in order to elicit psychedelic effects, so this study explored the effects of intravenous administration of a novel DMT formulation in terms of safety, tolerability, impacts on mood, and pharmacodynamics to inform key elements of a subsequent Phase 2a study of this formulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Staying true to our theme, “Beyond Psilocybin”, Jones et al. present results of their preclinical PK study of psilacetin, a currently unscheduled prodrug of psilocin that, when administered in the fumarate form to mice, appears to yield a lower peripheral psilocin exposure in vivo than that following psilocybin administration, and thus may provide some advantages in terms of dose titration in further animal studies and, potentially, in future human trials. In the meantime, psilacetin is proposed by the authors to be a useful research compound in preclinical psychedelic studies, thanks to its (currently) unscheduled status.

Finally, we present a manuscript by Wang et al. that addresses the very promising application of classic psychedelics to the treatment of end-of-life distress in the context of palliative care and palliative care patients’ attitudes towards this treatment option. This article discusses a range of themes that we anticipate will apply much more broadly as research and clinical communities continue to explore applications of psychedelics beyond psilocybin to the treatment of mental health conditions.

The manuscripts included in this Research Topic reflect the renewed global interest and ongoing progress in psychedelic clinical research, a fascinating area that, with some justification, is being described as a new paradigm in mental health treatment. While psilocybin has served as an excellent starting point for psychedelic research, we are encouraged to see the broadening of scope to explore a much wider range of psychedelic compounds, both already existing and yet to be created.

It is hoped that this Research Topic will spark interest and ultimately add further richness to the dynamic field of psychedelic research.

Author contributions

MW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DR: Project administration, Writing – review & editing. YS: Project administration, Writing – review & editing. JS: Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

Author JS was employed by the company Psilera Inc.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Barber GS, Aaronson ST. The emerging field of psychedelic psychotherapy. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2022) 24:583–90. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01363-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Nayak S, Johnson MW. Psychedelics and psychotherapy. Pharmacopsychiatry. (2021) 54:167–75. doi: 10.1055/a-1312-7297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Johnson DE, Rosenblat JD. Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy as an ‘anti-distressant’ with multidimensional properties. Nat Ment Health. (2024) 2:1275–6. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00332-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. The Lancet Regional Health-Europe. Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: hope and dilemma. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. (2023) 32:100727. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100727

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Siegel JS, Subramanian S, Perr D, Kay BP, Gordon EM, Laumann TO, et al. Psilocybin desynchronizes the human brain. Nature. (2024) 632:131–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07624-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dyck E. LSD: a new treatment emerging from the past. CMAJ. (2015) 187:1079–80. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rucker JJ, Young AH. Psilocybin: from serendipity to credibility? Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:659044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.659044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kwan AC, Olson DE, Preller KH, Roth BL. The neural basis of psychedelic action. Nat Neurosci. (2022) 25:1407–19. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01177-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Vargas MV, Meyer R, Avanes AA, Rus M, Olson DE. Psychedelics and other psychoplastogens for treating mental illness. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:727117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.727117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: psychedelic medicine, psilocybin, 5-MeO-DMT, DMT, ayahuasca, psilacetin, psychedelic-assisted therapy, LSD

Citation: Williams ML, Rudin D, Schmid Y and von Salm J (2025) Editorial: Beyond psilocybin: exploring the clinical potential of alternative and novel psychedelics. Front. Psychiatry 16:1600812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1600812

Received: 26 March 2025; Accepted: 01 April 2025;
Published: 23 April 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Roberto Ciccocioppo, University of Camerino, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Williams, Rudin, Schmid and von Salm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Martin L. Williams, bWFydGluQHByaXNtLm9yZy5hdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.