Corrigendum: The survey of the status of self-stigma of depression and its relationship with demographic factors in Gonabad, Iran

A Corrigendum on
The survey of the status of self-stigma of depression and its relationship with demographic factors in Gonabad, Iran

By Tehrani H, Naddafi F, Nejatian M and Jafari A (2024) Front. Psychiatry 15:1463879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1463879

In the published article, there were some errors in Table 1 as published. Some of the figures listed under the % column were inadvertently miscalculated or written incorrectly in the article. The percents for the first mention of ‘Radio, television and satellite’ was listed as ‘9.8’, ‘Psychologist/Psychiatrist’ was listed as ‘5.5’, second mention of ‘Internet’ was listed as ‘27.6’, the second mention of ‘Physician/Health care providers’ was listed as ‘7.3’, second mention of ‘Book’ was listed as ‘8.3’, second mention of ‘Friends and acquaintances’ was listed as ‘4.3’, the second mention of ‘Radio, television and satellite’ was listed as ‘4’, and ‘All items’ was listed as ‘19.6’. Secondly, the last variable has mistakenly written as ‘Did you family refer to a psychologist?’

The corrected Table 1 and its caption appears below.

Table 1

Table 1. Characteristics of demographic variables.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The last variable was written as ‘Did you family refer to psychologist?*’. It should read as ‘Did your family refer to a psychologist?**’ The corrected Table 3 and its caption appears below.

Table 3

Table 3. Relationship between demographic variables and self-stigma of depression (SSD).

In the published article, there was an error in Table 5 as published. The following footnotes ‘*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)’ and ‘* Independents sample T-test, ** One-way ANOVA’ was mistakenly added. The corrected Table 5 and its caption appears below.

Table 5

Table 5. Pearson correlation between variables.

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. ‘Radio, television and satellite’ was mistakenly calculated as ‘9.8%’. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appears below.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Results of Sources of obtaining health information.

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 as published. The percentages were all miscalculated. For ‘Pyschologist/Psychiatrist’ it was listed as ‘5.5,’ for ‘Internet’ it was listed as ‘27.6’, for ‘Physician/Health care providers’ it was listed as ‘7.3’, for ‘Book’ it was listed as ‘8.3’ and for ‘Friends and acquaintances’ it was listed as ‘4.3’. The corrected Figure 2 and its caption appears below.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Results of Sources of obtaining information related to mental illness.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.