Intermittent theta burst stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trail

Background: This study aims to evaluate the intervention effect of intermittent Theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on bilateral dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) for negative symptoms in schizophrenia using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to confirm the therapeutic significance of DMPFC in treating negative symptoms and provide new evidence for schizophrenia treatment and research.

Method: Thirty-nine schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms and mild cognitive impairment were randomly divided into a treatment group (n=20) and a control group (n=19). The treatment group received iTBS in bilateral DMPFC. The control group received the sham treatment. Negative symptoms, cognitive function, emotional state, and social function were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 4-, 8-, and 12-week follow-ups. Brain activation in regions of interest (ROIs) was evaluated through verbal fluency tasks. Changes in scale scores were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA.

Result: After 20 sessions of iTBS, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total and sub-scale scores significantly improved in the treatment group, with statistically significant differences. SANS scores differed significantly between pre- and post-treatment in both groups, with post-treatment scores markedly lower than pre-treatment and better efficacy in the treatment group. However, there was no significant difference in cognitive function, emotional state, and social function. ROIs did not differ significantly between groups before intervention. After treatment, prefrontal cortex activation was significantly higher in the treatment group than in controls, with a statistically significant difference. Regarding functional connectivity, the small-world properties Sigma and Gamma were enhanced.

Conclusion: iTBS on bilateral DMPFC can effectively alleviate negative symptoms and enhance prefrontal cortex activation and the small-world properties in patients of schizophrenia.

1 Background

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disease with a global incidence rate of nearly 1% and is one of the main causes of disability worldwide, contributing to 12.2% of disability-adjusted life-years globally (1). According to the previous study, the incidence of social function deficits among community Schizophrenia patients is as high as 96.5%, and the unemployment rate is between 70% and 90% (2). Besides typical positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, schizophrenia patients also exhibit different symptoms such as negative symptoms (NS), cognitive impairment (CI), and emotional disorders (3). Currently, the treatment of positive symptoms with medication is relatively satisfactory, but the treatment efficacy for NS and CI is poor, and there is a lack of effective intervention measures. Evidence indicates that NS and CI have a greater negative impact on patients’ quality of life and social functioning than positive symptoms in Schizophrenia (4).

Research has shown that there is a correlation between NS and CI, which are related but separable domains with different functional implications. Their neurobiological basis may partially overlap, and they are both associated with prefrontal lobe dysfunction to some extent (4, 5). Saleh et al.’s research suggests that CI and the severity of NS have a positive correlation. They may be involved in different parts of motivational impairment, have unique contributions to motivational behavior, and collectively lead to motivational impairment in Schizophrenia. Moreover, they may have different impacts on treatment methods (6). Robison et al. indicated that CI in Schizophrenia undermines reward sensitivity because cognitive success is inherently linked to internal motivational drive (7). Xu et al. showed that NS, CI, and reward circuit abnormalities are associated with impaired function within and between prefrontal areas and the basal ganglia, and may reduce spontaneous synchrony between the midbrain and medial and lateral prefrontal cortex (8). Therefore, in the treatment of NS, we cannot ignore the impact of CI. We want to explore whether there are differences in the clinical efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS) in treating NS in patients with schizophrenia under different cognitive states. Therefore, we divide the severity of cognitive impairment into mild cognitive impairment and moderate to severe cognitive impairment. In this study, we only included Schizophrenia patients with NS and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, defined as a MoCA score between 18-26) (9).

As one of the core symptoms of Schizophrenia, NS has a high incidence rate, long duration, and worsens with disease progression (10, 11). In the past, studies classified NS into a single group and often reported them as a single symptomatology domain. However, increasing evidence suggests that the underlying structure of NS is best related to the five domains identified at the 2005 National Institute of Mental Health Consensus Development Conference: anhedonia, avolition, asociality, blunted affect, and alogia (12, 13). Research results in different domains have great significance for determining pathophysiological mechanisms and targeted therapies for NS. However, there is a relative lack of detailed analyses on the efficacy of treatments in different domains. This study will divide NS into five dimensions based on the Scale for the SANS to explore treatment efficacy.

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a key brain region involved in executive function and plays a central role in goal-oriented behavior (14). Frontal dysfunction is often observed in patients with schizophrenia (15). Curtin et al.’s study showed that decreased PFC function and changes in sub-cortical connectivity are correlated with NS and CI in schizophrenia (15). The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), as an important part of the PFC, plays a crucial role in many brain functions, such as cognitive regulation, emotional regulation, and motivational control (16). It has been demonstrated in rodent models that neuromodulation of the medial prefrontal cortex affects dopamine signaling in the striatum, subsequently altering reward behavior (17). The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex(DMPFC), as an important part of the mesolimbic dopamine system, plays a significant role in the reward circuit (18). Studies have shown that abnormal reward circuits may lead to NS in schizophrenia, such as anhedonia, social motivation, and voluntary impairments. Zhang et al. found that NS are related to abnormal DMPFC function in schizophrenia patients (19). Stimulating the DMPFC to regulate reward circuits and improve PFC dysfunction may be a potential new therapeutic target for treating NS in schizophrenia.

The treatment of NS has always been a focus and challenge in current clinical work. Effective pharmacological treatments for NS are still rare, and exploring other effective treatment measures is an urgent need. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and non-invasive neuromodulation technique widely used in the treatment of mental illnesses (20). Evidence suggests that high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) can improve NS in schizophrenia patients and may be a promising treatment approach (21). However, its therapeutic effects and impact on brain function remain controversial (22). iTBS is a patterned HF-rTMS sequence that can deliver a greater number of pulse stimuli in a shorter time, helping to induce long-term potentiation (LTP) in neurological function, target damaged neural circuits, and activate abnormal network connections (23, 24). This stimulation pattern is closer to the physiological state of neural activity, and the stimulation intensity is weaker than that of traditional HF-rTMS, making it a safe and feasible treatment method in clinical settings (25). Zhao et al.’s study indicated that, compared to traditional HF-rTMS, iTBS can significantly reduce NS in schizophrenia patients (26). A recent randomized controlled study on NS in schizophrenia showed that HF-rTMS stimulation of the DMPFC can improve NS, mainly blunted affect and anhedonia (27). However, Bodén et al.’s study reached the opposite conclusion, indicating that iTBS stimulation of the DMPFC had no significant therapeutic effect on the MAP subgroup of NS in schizophrenia. Nevertheless, their study had certain limitations. Firstly, only the MAP subgroup was included, not all patients with NS, which may have led to inclusion bias. Secondly, the study sample size was relatively small (28). Further research is needed to investigate the clinical efficacy of iTBS stimulation of the DMPFC and its effects on PFC function in patients with NS of schizophrenia.

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy(fNIRS) is a non-invasive optical neuroimaging technique that has been increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience research related to various diseases (29). fNIRS can measure changes in the concentrations of oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR) in the cerebral cortex to explore the activation of different cortical regions (30). Based on the neurovascular coupling phenomenon, fNIRS can effectively evaluate neural activity (31). In brain functional imaging, fNIRS is as effective as fMRI, PET, electroencephalography, and other brain functional imaging technologies (32). It is often used in combination with rTMS to explore clinical efficacy and underlying mechanisms. Verbal fluency task (VFT) is a commonly used cognitive task in fNIRS research, which is related to basic neurocognitive activities such as executive function, working memory, and attention. Currently, VFT is widely used in psychiatric research as a sensitive indicator of cognitive deficits that rely on frontal lobe activation. Numerous fNIRS studies have reported that schizophrenia patients exhibit lower activation of HbO in the PFC during VFT compared to healthy controls, demonstrating abnormal brain activation patterns and low task-related functional connectivity (FC) (33, 34). fNIRS is commonly used to explore changes in PFC activation in patients with various psychiatric disorders before and after transcranial magnetic stimulation (35, 36). However, there is a lack of research on how PFC activation changes in patients with NS of schizophrenia before and after iTBS treatment, and the underlying neural mechanisms remain largely unknown, requiring further exploration.

To explore the efficacy and mechanism of iTBS stimulation of bilateral DMPFC in the treatment of NS in Schizophrenia, and to exclude the influence of CI on the treatment of NS in Schizophrenia, we screened patients with NS of Schizophrenia combined with MCI for intervention and evaluated them using fNIRS. We hypothesize that iTBS stimulation of bilateral DMPFC can increase the activation level of the PFC, promote the improvement of patients’ brain functional connectivity, and ultimately improve NS in schizophrenia.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design and participants

This study was a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Thirty-nine patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia who met the inclusion criteria were recruited from Jinxin Mental Hospital. Post-enrollment, the patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group using a random number table method. The treatment group received 4 weeks of active iTBS treatment on the DMPFC [25.84% of the distance from the nasion to the inion on the midline of the scalp] (36), while the control group received sham treatment. During the treatment process, the evaluators remained unaware of the treatment allocation until the study’s completion and the breaking of the random code. The enrolled patients agreed to maintain their current medication regimen throughout the treatment process. This study was conducted at Chengdu Jinxin Mental Hospital from May 2023 to March 2024. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and registered as a clinical trial (registration number: ChiCTR2400079548). All patients participated upon providing written informed consent.

The inclusion criteria for the participants were as follows: 1) Age between 18-59 years; 2) Meeting the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, diagnosed by a psychiatrist based on MINI Plus v 5.0, with a disease course of at least 1 year; 3) Having received second-generation antipsychotic drugs, including Risperidone, Clozapine, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, and Aripiprazole, with stable dosage in the past 1 month (no specific dosage requirements) and maintaining unchanged dosage throughout the entire treatment and follow-up period; 4) Exhibiting significant negative symptoms: a negative symptom score on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) of not less than 20, and at least one item on the PANSS negative symptom scale ≥ 4 points; 5) All patients having stable clinical conditions, being able to provide informed consent, and all participants having obtained written informed consent; 6) Combined mild cognitive impairment, with a MoCA score of 18-26 (37).

The exclusion criteria for this study were as follows: 1) Comorbidity with other brain diseases, such as stroke, epilepsy, or traumatic brain injury; 2) Serious physical conditions, including severe liver, kidney, cardiovascular, and other diseases; 3) History of alcohol and drug abuse, and current substance abuse; 4) Personal or family history of other mental illnesses, including personality disorders and intellectual disabilities; 5) Having metal clips, metal plates, or any other metal objects in the head; 6) Receiving electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months; 7) Pregnancy or breastfeeding; 8) Receiving first-generation antipsychotic drugs and benzodiazepines; 9) Non-cooperation with the assessment and treatment process. The flow-chart of this study is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1. The flow-chart of this study.

2.2 Randomization

Patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups using the random number table method. And we generated unique randomization codes for each subject. First, 40 random numbers were generated using a random number generator; then, numbers less than 20 defined group 1, numbers greater than 20 defined group 2. Finally, the intervention method was distributed to the patients based on the random numbers prepared in the consent form. At randomization, patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to the treatment group and control group.

2.3 Sample size

According to previous studies, clinical response for patients with schizophrenia was 9% for sham and 54% for active iTBS. Therefore, we assumed that 10% would respond to sham and 54% to active TBS (with alpha = 0.05 and a power of 80%). Based on this, we would need 40 patients (half sham and half active) to detect a clinical treatment effect. With assuming an attrition of 20%, we would need to enroll 50 patients at last.

2.4 iTBS program

Participants received iTBS treatment on weekdays, completing a total of 20 treatments. Magnetic stimulation was generated using a CCY-IA magnetic stimulator (Yiruide Medical Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) and butterfly coils. Before the first TMS treatment, the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle was determined as the lowest transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity required to elicit a motor-evoked potential (measured by an EMG system, Yiruide, Wuhan, China) ≥ 50 µV in at least 5 out of 10 trials. In this study, the stimulation target was the DMPFC. The localization method involved having patients wear a coil cap made based on the 10-20 international standard lead system, which needed to be accurately placed on the patient’s nasion, inion, and left and right ears. The stimulation coil consists of two large circular coils forming an obtuse angle, and been placed on the scalp midline at 25.84% of the distance from the nasion to the inion, with the stimulation accomplished by orienting the obtuse angle perpendicular to the scalp, and the handle pointing towards the patient’s lateral side (38). The iTBS treatment parameters were: stimulation intensity of 90% of the resting threshold; each train consisted of 2 seconds of continuous burst stimulation followed by an 8-second rest; each burst consisted of 3 pulse trains at 50 Hz, with bursts repeated every 0.2 seconds at a frequency of 5 Hz, for a total of 1200 pulses. The iTBS stimulation coil was first positioned on the left or right DMPFC, and then switched to the contralateral side for a second identical treatment after one course of pulse stimulation (1200 pulses) was completed. The control group used the sham stimulation coil, which was placed at the same sites as in active treatment and delivered the same stimulation parameters.

To ensure study safety, iTBS intervention safety assessments were conducted once a week. The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention was assessed through self-reporting, including seizures, headaches, dizziness, nausea, insomnia, facial spasms, etc.

2.5 Assessment

2.5.1 Clinical assessments

To evaluate the efficacy of iTBS on DMPFC for NS in schizophrenia patients, we chose the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) (39) to evaluate the psychopathological status of patients before and after treatment; the SANS (40) was used to evaluate the negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (37) assessed cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) (41) was used to examine the depressive symptoms in schizophrenia patients. The Screening for Deficits in Social Functioning Scale (SDSS) is used to evaluate the social function of patients with schizophrenia. The PANSS scale was evaluated pre-treatment and post-treatment, as well as at the 12-week follow-up. Other scales are evaluated pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at the 4-week, 8-week, and 12-week follow-ups.

2.5.2 fNIRS assessment

Based on the modified Beer-Lambert law, the fNIRS device (BS-3000, Wuhan Znion Medical Technology Co., Wuhan, China) measures the changes in the concentrations of HbO and HbR in the cerebral cortex using two wavelengths of infrared light (695 and 830 nm). The absorption of infrared light emitted by dual-wavelength laser diodes can distinguish changes in deoxygenated hemoglobin and oxygenated hemoglobin (42). The system consists of 16 light emitters and 16 light detectors, forming 53 channels, with a distance of 3 cm between each emitter and detector. Channels (ch) are defined as the measurement area between the detector and the source-detector pair. The sampling rate is set to 20 Hz. The placement system is made according to the international 10-20 standard lead system, with the lowest probe placed along the Fp1–Fp2 line. The channels are located in the participants’ frontal and temporal lobes. The patients were conducted in a quiet area to reduce unwanted stimuli that could influence the testing; they were asked to sit in a comfortable chair and relax their bodies. And a dedicated data collection specialist observed the patient’s condition throughout the entire process to ensure the accuracy of data collection. The fNIRS was evaluated pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at the 12-week follow-up. The measurement points of the 53 channels and the division of regions of interest (ROI) for NIRS were shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Arrangement of the 53 channels covering the frontal lobe. Including the PreM and SMA (premotor and supplementary motor areas), FEF (frontal eye fields), BROCA (Broca’s area), FPA (frontopolar area), DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and mPFC (medial prefrontal cortex).

Resting state: For the resting state test, the subjects were asked to wear the fNIRS detection cap. They were required to keep their eyes open and remain still while looking at the center fixation point (crosshair) displayed in front of them to prevent them from sleeping. The fNIRS measurement began and lasted for eight minutes. When the tests ended, the fixation point disappeared, and the last 30-second rest period began. After the rest period ended, the detection cap was removed, and the detection ended.

VFT: In this study, the VFT was developed based on the Chinese population. Each trial included a 30-second pre-task rest period, a 60-second task period, and a 60-second post-task rest period. During the pre-task and post-task rest periods, participants were required to count based on the voice prompts provided by the fNIRS device. The 60-second task period was divided into three consecutive modules, each lasting 20 seconds. In each 20-second module, the subjects needed to name items in a specific category, such as “vegetable names,” “fruit names,” “animal names,” or “furniture names.” Three modules randomly appeared each time, and the subjects were required to name as many items as possible in the relevant category according to the requirements (see Figure 3). The testing process was the same for all participants. Before the formal testing, we provided a practice session for all participants to ensure they fully understood the task. During the task period, we monitored the participants’ performance to ensure their full participation in the assessment.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The VFT protocol used for near-infrared spectroscopy. Each trail consisted of a 30s pre-task rest period, a 60s task period subdivided into three 20s blocks, and a 60s post-task rest period.

2.6 fNIRS data analysis

Data processing was performed using the Homer2 toolbox in the MATLAB environment. Pre-processing procedures were as follows: (1) Converting raw data to optical density (OD); (2) Correcting motion artifacts using a spline interpolation algorithm; (3) Applying a 0.01–0.1 Hz band-pass filter to minimize physiological interference and produce data with the best signal-to-noise ratio, such as blood pressure (Mayer) waves (∼0.1 Hz), respiration (∼0.4 Hz), and heart pulsation (1∼1. 5 Hz); and (4) Converting optical density to relative HbO/HbR concentration through the modified Beer-Lambert law.

HbO has a superior signal-to-noise ratio and can reflect task-related cortical activation more directly than HbR. Therefore, we analyzed the differences in HbO between the two groups of patients before and after treatment. First, we used the HRF function to correct for auto-correlation in the data, and then we used wavelet filtering to filter the data. Finally, the β value was calculated using the general linear model (GLM).

2.7 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM Corp.). Baseline data, such as demographic characteristics and clinical variables, were analyzed using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. For clinical assessment scales and HbO values before and after treatment, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to evaluate the data distribution of all continuous variables. If the continuous variables followed a normal distribution and had equal variances, they were expressed as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD). For data that did not satisfy a normal distribution, normalization was achieved through logarithmic transformation. Subsequently, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis, with changes in PANSS and SANS scores as the main outcome indicators. The within-subject factor was time (baseline, post-treatment, 4-week follow-up, 8-week follow-up, and 12-week follow-up), and the between-subject factor was group (treatment group and control group). For fNIRS-related indicators before and after treatment, if the differences were statistically significant, FDR correction was further used for post-hoc comparisons. Estimated mean group differences were reported with 95% confidence intervals, with P < 0.05 considered significant and corrected for the false discovery rate (FDR).

3 Results

3.1 Demographic and clinical characteristics

Table 1 presents a comprehensive summary of the demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of all study participants. The treatment group comprised 20 participants, with a mean age of 49.15 ± 5.12 years, including 12 males and 8 females. The control group consisted of 19 participants, with a mean age of 45.95 ± 7.97 years, comprising 10 males and 9 females. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. It is noteworthy that no adverse reactions were reported throughout the treatment process. Detailed information regarding these characteristics is provided in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample.

3.2 Clinical evaluation results after iTBS treatment and follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks

The average PANSS total score stratified by group (treatment group and control group) and time (baseline, post-treatment, and 12-week follow-up) was shown in Figure 4A. In the repeated measures ANOVA for PANSS, there were no significant statistical differences in the main effect of group (F=0.12, P=0.74). The main effect of time on PANSS total score (F=18.74, P=0.000) and the interaction between group and time were statistically significant (F=14.08, P=0.000). The PANSS-N and PANSS-G results were similar to the PANSS total results, as shown in Figures 4C, D, while PANSS-P showed no statistical differences, as shown in Figure 4B. For more information, see Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The effect of iTBS on clinical symptoms in schizophrenia patients. Compared to the control group, clinical assessment in schizophrenia patients were completed in the PANSS -total scores (A), PANSS-positive symptoms (B), PANSS-negative symptoms (C), and PANSS-general symptoms (D).

The average SANS total score stratified by group (treatment group and control group) and time (baseline, post-treatment, 4-week follow-up, 8-week follow-up, and 12-week follow-up) was shown in Figure 5A. In the repeated measures ANOVA for SANS total score, both the main effect of group (F=6.82, P=0.013) and the main effect of time (F=12.63, P=0.000) were significant, and the interaction between group and time was highly significant (F=11.19, P=0.000). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the SANS sub-scales. The results for affective flattening and alogia were very similar to the SANS total score, as shown in Figures 5B, C. The main effect of group for avolition showed statistical differences (F=5.14, P=0.03), but the main effect of time showed no significant statistical differences (F=2.41, P=0.051), and the interaction between group and time showed statistical differences (F=4.05, P=0.004), as shown in Figure 5D. The main effect of group for anhedonia showed no statistical differences (F=1.95, P=0.17), but the main effect of time showed significant statistical differences (F=6.42, P=0.000), and the interaction between group and time showed statistical differences (F=3.87, P=0.005), as shown in Figure 5E. There were no significant differences for SANS attentional impairment (Figure 5F). For more information, see Supplementary Table S2.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The effect of iTBS on negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients. Compared to the control group, the negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients were improved greatly in the treatment group in SANS total score (A), SANS-affective flattening (B), SANS-alogia (C), SANS-avolition (D), SANS-anhedonia (E), and SANS-attentional impairment (F).

As for MoCA, CDSS, and SDSS, no significant group main effect and interaction were found between treatment group and control group (all P > 0.05). For more information, see in Supplementary Table S3.

3.3 Comparison of pre- and post-measurement HbO indexes in different cerebral regions

Independent sample t-tests and paired sample t-tests were used to test the blood oxygen activities in each cerebral region before and after treatment (cerebral regions: LmPFC, RmPFC, LFEF, RFEF, LDLPFC, RDLPFC, LBroca, RBroca, LFPA, RFPA, LPre & SMA, RPre & SMA; oxygen parameters: HbO).

Before the treatment, there were no significant statistical differences in brain region activation between the two groups. After treatment, during the VFT task, the treatment group showed significantly higher activation in the left premotor and supplementary motor area (T=2.15, P=0.040), left Broca’s area (T=2.77, P=0.010), right Broca’s area (T=3.26, P=0.003), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (T=2.09, P=0.046) compared to the control group (see Figure 6). No other significant statistical differences were observed in other brain regions (all P> 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Brain averaged activation maps from changes in HbO for two groups during the VFT pre- and post-treatment.

3.4 Analysis of brain network links

Figures 7 and 8 showed the average functional connectivity metrics between two groups pre- and post-treatment, and it was used to evaluate the FC between different brain regions pre- and post-treatment. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Average function connection metrics in pre-treatment and post-treatment between treatment group and control group.

Figure 8

Figure 8. ROI-based function connection metrics without significant inter-group differences.

3.5 Analysis of brain network properties

For the network properties, the area under the curve (AUC) of Gamma and Sigma showed significant differences in paired sample t-tests and independent sample t-tests for pre- and post-treatment in the treatment group compared with the control group (see Figures 9A, B). After treatment, the small-world sigma and gamma values showed significant improvement in the treatment group (P<0.05) (see Tables 2, 3). The AUC of Cp, Lp, Eloc, and Eg showed no significant differences between the two groups (see Figures 9C–F).

Figure 9

Figure 9. The network properties between treatment group and control group. AUC, area under the curve; Cp, clustering coefficient; Lp, characteristic path length; Eloc, local efficiency; Eg, global efficiency. AUC of Gamma (A) AUC of Sigma (B) AUC of Cp (C) AUC of Lp (D) AUC of Eloc (E) AUC of Eg (F).

Table 2

Table 2. The AUC of Gamma pre- and post-treatment between two groups.

Table 3

Table 3. The AUC of Sigma pre- and post-treatment between two groups.

3.6 Correlation analysis of negative symptoms (PANSS and SANS) and blood oxygen index changes in each cerebral region

Correlation analysis was performed on the changes in PANSS scores and its subscales (post-treatment PANSS score − pre-treatment PANSS score), SANS scores and its subscales (post-treatment SANS score − pre-treatment SANS score), and global property brain connectivity change indicators in the brain connectivity changes (post-treatment global property indicator − pre-treatment global property indicator). The results showed that AUC of Sigma had a negative correlation with the SANS total score (r=-0.367, P=0.046) and a negative correlation with affective flattening (r=-0.445, P=0.014) (see Figures 10A, B). AUC of Gamma had a negative correlation with the SANS total score (r=-0.366, P=0.047) and a negative correlation with affective flattening (r=-0.452, P=0.012) (see Figures 10C, D). No other significant correlations were found (all p > 0.05).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Correlations between changes in SANS-total scores (post-treatment—pre-treatment) and SANS-affective flattening with the changes in AUC of Sigma and Gamma (post-treatment—pre-treatment). Correlation between Sigma and SANS-total (A); Correlation between Sigma and SANS-affective flattening (B); Correlation between Gamma and SANS-total (C); Correlation between Gamma and SANS-affective flattening (D).

4 Discussion

The treatment of NS in schizophrenia has always been a challenge, and drug therapy has shown limited efficacy. Neuroregulatory techniques may be a potential treatment measure. Previous studies have mostly used rTMS to stimulate the DLPFC, but the results have been mixed. In recent years, studies have suggested that the DMPFC may be a promising stimulation target. However, there are still many uncertainties about the brain activation and functional connectivity of schizophrenia patients with NS after iTBS stimulation of the DMPFC. This study combined fNIRS to further explore the changes in brain function. The results showed that after 4 weeks of treatment, the PANSS-N and SANS scores of NS significantly decreased, with statistically significant differences. After iTBS treatment, the NS of schizophrenia patients were effectively relieved, with the most significant improvements being affective flattening and alogia. The therapeutic effects were maintained for at least 8 weeks after treatment, but the symptoms of patients began to slowly rebound 4 weeks after treatment. Avolition showed statistically significant differences between groups, but the differences were not significant across different measurement time points. As time progressed, the differences between the two groups remained statistically significant. However, anhedonia did not show statistically significant differences between groups, but this difference became statistically significant over time. In addition, no adverse events were reported during the treatment process. Stimulation of the bilateral DMPFC by iTBS is a safe and effective treatment strategy, and these results are consistent with the conclusions of Gan et al. (27).

Previous studies had shown that NS had a significant association with the dysfunction of prefrontal-striatal networks. Within this network, key structures, including the ventral and dorsal striatum, medial PFC, orbitofrontal cortex, and DLPFC, may have reduced activation (43). With the relief of NS after treatment, we anticipated that this treatment strategy could cause changes in patients’ brain activation. The results of this study showed that after treatment, the HbO of Broca’s area, PreM & SMA, and DLPFC in patients was significantly higher than in the control group. That is, after treatment, the activation of Broca’s area, PreM & SMA, and DLPFC increased in patients during the VFT task. The increase in blood flow has a positive effect on promoting neuronal synaptic activation (44). Broca’s area is the language center in patients and plays an important role in speech production and language processing. Research has indicated that structural and functional abnormalities in this area are associated with clinical symptoms and CI in schizophrenia patients (45). Specific language-related circuits are impaired, and language-related processing disorders, such as word fluency, constitute the core neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia. These impairments are believed to be the cause of formal thought disorders in schizophrenia patients and occur early in the onset of the disease (46). Improving Broca’s area activation has positive implications for symptom relief in patients. The results of this study suggest that the increased activation of Broca’s area after iTBS treatment may have positive effects on the improvement of language function and thought disorders in patients. Zhang et al. also pointed out that iTBS treatment can help improve Broca’s area activation in depression patients, and iTBS may become a potential tool for neural remodeling of language and cognitive functions in patients (47). Previous studies have shown that different sub-regions of the mPFC may represent different functions, and the dorsal mPFC and pre-SMA jointly participate in cognitive control processes (48). Sjöberg et al. also pointed out that the Pre-M is not only involved in motor control but is particularly related to higher-level cognitive processes (49). Bender et al. found that the activation of the (pre)motor regions before and around motor execution was significantly reduced in schizophrenia patients (50). In this study, iTBS stimulation of the bilateral DMPFC promoted increased activation of the Pre-M & SMA in patients, which may have positive implications for both motor control and cognitive control. Previous neuroimaging studies have found that NS are associated with decreased activation of the DLPFC (51). Improving DLPFC activation is correlated with the alleviation of NS in patients. Dlabac-de et al. also indicated that the increase in right PFC (including right DLPFC) activation is the first evidence of rTMS treatment for NS in schizophrenia patients: rTMS helps increase the activation of the prefrontal cortex (52). This conclusion is consistent with our research findings.

The results of this study indicate that after iTBS treatment, the small-world properties, Sigma and Gamma, improved to varying degrees in schizophrenia patients. The changes in functional connectivity were negatively correlated with symptom relief, suggesting that the processing ability of local information in the brain may be enhanced after treatment, which could be one of the mechanisms promoting symptom relief in patients. Previous studies have shown that small-world topological structures support the emergence of complex neurodynamics, characterized by achieving the coexistence of functional segregation and integration (53). The brain achieves efficient local and global information transmission with lower energy consumption (54). At the same time, Wang et al.’s research suggests that this dynamic balance helps support the intrinsic needs of different levels of consciousness and cognitive functions, enhances information computing ability, and promotes benefits in other functions (55, 56). Research has shown that schizophrenia is considered a “connectivity disorder” syndrome caused by abnormal neural network formation, and Schizophrenia symptoms are associated with reduced clustering coefficients and changes in local efficiency and small-worldness (57). Zhang et al. found that iTBS treatment can improve brain functional connectivity in depression patients (47). Brady et al. also pointed out that iTBS treatment can promote changes in functional connectivity in schizophrenia patients with NS, and there is a strong relationship between changes in functional connectivity and NS (58).

Motivation impairment and goal-oriented behavioral disorders are considered core features of NS in schizophrenia, particularly closely related to reward deficits (59). Previous studies had shown that an aberrant reward circuit (including aberrant neurotransmitter level, hypo-activation, and hypo-connectivity) was related to NS, with DMPFC playing an important role as a key component of the reward circuit (60, 61). Cho et al.’s research suggests that HF-rTMS stimulation of DMPFC can modulate neurotransmitter levels and circuit integrity in the reward circuit (62). Downar et al.’s study suggests that HF-rTMS stimulation of DMPFC to promote reward circuit integrity may be a reliable neuroimaging predictor of patient functional improvement (63). Therefore, we believe that iTBS stimulation of DMPFC can promote the alleviation of NS in schizophrenia patients by regulating neurotransmitter levels as well as the activity of the PFC and improving the connectivity of reward circuits. In recent years, there have been ongoing studies exploring the DMPFC as a new target for the treatment of various diseases. Struckmann et al. found that iTBS on the DMPFC can promote clinical symptom relief, increase prefrontal oxygenated hemoglobin levels, and improve brain functional connectivity in patients with depression (64). Cheng et al. reached the same conclusion, suggesting that rTMS of the DMPFC can promote symptom improvement and have a positive impact on emotional regulation in patients with depression (65). Fatakdawala et al. indicated that iTBS stimulation of the DMPFC can promote changes in individual dietary behavior, with significantly increased activation of the medial PFC in individuals after treatment (66). Dunlop et al. reported that rTMS treatment targeting the DMPFC can improve symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and alter the functional connectivity between the DMPFC and ventral striatum (67). In research on the treatment of NS in schizophrenia, some scholars have also used the DMPFC as a treatment target (47). Although they pointed to improvements in clinical symptoms, unfortunately, despite these studies producing potential therapeutic improvements, they did not provide an explanation of the mechanisms by which these improvements occur, nor did they demonstrate that the improvements are due to enhancements in brain functional connectivity and activation. This study used bilateral DMPFC as a stimulation target and further explored its impact on brain function in combination with fNIRS. The results indicated that this treatment regimen may have a positive impact on NS and promote PFC activation, but the findings require further validation with a larger sample size in future studies.

This study also has certain limitations. Firstly, the sample size is relatively small, which limits our ability to emphasize differences between the two groups. In the future, we hope to have larger sample size studies to validate our research results. Secondly, our study focuses on a specific subset of people with NS - those with mild cognitive impairment; hence, the generalisability is limited. However, in our other article titled ‘‘Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for NS in Schizophrenia Patients with Moderate to Severe Cognitive Impairment: A Randomised Controlled Trail,” the main focus is on patients with NS and moderate to severe cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Based on the two articles, we believe that CI may affect the treatment of NS in Schizophrenia. This is of great significance for guiding our future research. In the future, we will investigate the therapeutic effect of iTBS combined with cognitive training on schizophrenia and explore effective treatment strategies for NS in Schizophrenia. Thirdly, although fNIRS has its unique advantages, its limitations in terms of insufficient spatial resolution and susceptibility to various factors during the data acquisition process must be objectively recognized. To address the insufficient spatial resolution, a 53-channel device was employed to further improve the accuracy of data acquisition. To mitigate the influence of multiple factors during the data collection process, several measures were implemented. The patients were assessed in a quiet area to reduce unwanted stimuli that could influence the testing, and they were asked to sit in a comfortable chair and relax their body. A dedicated data collection specialist observed the patient’s condition throughout the entire process to ensure the accuracy of data collection. To address the influence of factors such as ambient light, skull thickness, hair density, and head movement, their impact was reduced before data collection by minimizing ambient light and preparing experiments to separate hair follicles during sensor placement. Other factors, such as head movement, can usually be analyzed to reduce interference caused by motion artifacts during later data processing. Finally, we used the scalp localization method determined by Mir-Moghtadaei to locate the site of DMPFC stimulation (38), rather than a more accurate neuronavigation-guided localization approach. However, this localization method has been successfully applied to the treatment of various diseases in previous studies and has demonstrated high consistency with MRI-guided neuronavigation localization methods (67–69).

5 Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that iTBS stimulation of the bilateral DMPFC has a positive therapeutic effect on the treatment of NS in schizophrenia, with significant improvements in NS observed in individuals after the intervention. Based on fNIRS, there was a significant statistical difference in brain oxygen levels between the two groups pre- and post-intervention. After treatment, patients in the treatment group exhibited significantly increased blood oxygen levels and activation in the Broca’s area, left premotor cortex (L-PreM), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). The treatment helps to enhance functional connectivity between the patients’ brain regions.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

JL: Writing – original draft. XM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. DJ: Writing – review & editing. XH: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TX: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. WZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the 1 3 5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Grant No. ZYJC21004).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the study participants and colleagues.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1500113/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Collaborators, G. B. D. M. D. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. (2022) 9:137–50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Marwaha S, Johnson S, Bebbington P, Stafford M, Angermeyer MC, Brugha T, et al. Rates and correlates of employment in people with schizophrenia in the UK, France and Germany. Br J Psychiatry. (2018) 191:30–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020982

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. McCutcheon RA, Reis Marques T, Howes OD. Schizophrenia—An overview. JAMA Psychiatry. (2020) 77:201–10. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Strassnig M, Bowie C, Pinkham AE, Penn D, Twamley EW, Patterson TL, et al. Which levels of cognitive impairments and negative symptoms are related to functional deficits in schizophrenia? J Psychiatr Res. (2018) 104:124–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.06.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bagney A, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Martinez-Gras I, Sanchez-Morla EM, Santos JL, Jimenez-Arriero MA, et al. Negative symptoms and executive function in schizophrenia: does their relationship change with illness duration? Psychopathology. (2013) 46:241–8. doi: 10.1159/000342345

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Saleh Y, Jarratt-Barnham I, Petitet P, Fernandez-Egea E, Manohar SG, Husain M. Negative symptoms and cognitive impairment are associated with distinct motivational deficits in treatment resistant schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. (2023) 28:4831–41. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02232-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Robison AJ, Thakkar KN, Diwadkar VA. Cognition and reward circuits in schizophrenia: synergistic, not separate. Biol Psychiatry. (2020) 87:204–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Xu P, Klaasen NG, Opmeer EM, Pijnenborg GHM, van Tol M-J, Liemburg EJ, et al. Intrinsic mesocorticolimbic connectivity is negatively associated with social amotivation in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2019) 208:353–9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Claveau J-S, Presse N, Kergoat M-J, Villalpando JM. The lost years: delay between the onset of cognitive symptoms and clinical assessment at a memory clinic. Can Geriatrics J. (2018) 21:152–6. doi: 10.5770/cgj.21.297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sicras-Mainar A, Maurino J, Ruiz-Beato E, Navarro-Artieda R. Impact of negative symptoms on healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in adult outpatients with schizophrenia: a population-based study. BMC Psychiatry. (2014) 14:225. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0225-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Austin SF, Mors O, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Secher RG, Hjorthøj CR, Bertelsen M, et al. Long-term trajectories of positive and negative symptoms in first episode psychosis: A 10year follow-up study in the OPUS cohort. Schizophr Res. (2015) 168:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Strauss GP, Nuñez A, Ahmed AO, Barchard KA, Granholm E, Kirkpatrick B, et al. The latent structure of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. (2018) 75:1271–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Bitter I, Mohr P, Raspopova N, Szulc A, Samochowiec J, Micluia IV, et al. Assessment and treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia-A regional perspective. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:820801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.820801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Menon V, D’Esposito M. The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2022) 47:90–103. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01152-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Curtin A, Sun J, Zhao Q, Onaral B, Wang J, Tong S, et al. Visuospatial task-related prefrontal activity is correlated with negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:9575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45893-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Xu P, Chen A, Li Y, Xing X, Lu H. Medial prefrontal cortex in neurogical diseases. Physiol Genomics. (2019) 51(9):432–442. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00006.2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Frost KH, Strauss GP. A review of anticipatory pleasure in schizophrenia. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. (2016) 3:232–47. doi: 10.1007/s40473-016-0082-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Telang F. Addiction: Beyond dopamine reward circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2011) 108:15037–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010654108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhang B, Lin P, Shi H, Ongur D, Auerbach RP, Wang X, et al. Mapping anhedonia-specific dysfunction in a transdiagnostic approach: an ALE meta-analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. (2016) 10:920–39. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9457-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mehta UM, Naik SS, Thanki MV, Thirthalli J. Investigational and therapeutic applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2019) 21:89. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1076-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Osoegawa C, Gomes JS, Grigolon RB, Brietzke E, Gadelha A, Lacerda ALT, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. (2018) 197:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wobrock T, Guse B, Cordes J, Wolwer W, Winterer G, Gaebel W, et al. Left prefrontal high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms: a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter trial. Biol Psychiatry. (2015) 77:979–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. (2020) 131:474–528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Amer A, Martin JH. Repeated motor cortex theta-burst stimulation produces persistent strengthening of corticospinal motor output and durable spinal cord structural changes in the rat. Brain Stimul. (2022) 15:1013–22. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Chen X, Ji GJ, Zhu C, Bai X, Wang L, He K, et al. Neural correlates of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia and the therapeutic response to theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Schizophr Bull. (2019) 45:474–83. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zhao S, Kong J, Li S, Tong Z, Yang C, Zhong H. Randomized controlled trial of four protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. (2014) 26:15–21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gan H, Zhu J, Zhuo K, Zhang J, Tang Y, Qian Z, et al. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. (2021) 299:113876. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113876

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Boden R, Bengtsson J, Thornblom E, Struckmann W, Persson J. Dorsomedial prefrontal theta burst stimulation to treat anhedonia, avolition, and blunted affect in schizophrenia or depression - a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. (2021) 290:308–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.053

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ferrari M, Quaresima V. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage. (2012) 63:921–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Eastmond C, Subedi A, De S, Intes X. Deep learning in fNIRS: a review. Neurophotonics. (2022) 9:041411. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.9.4.041411

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Lawrence RJ, Wiggins IM, Hodgson JC, Hartley DEH. Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Hear Res. (2021) 401:108155. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rahman MA, Siddik AB, Ghosh TK, Khanam F, Ahmad M. A narrative review on clinical applications of fNIRS. J Digit Imaging. (2020) 33:1167–84. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00387-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Shinba T, Kariya N, Matsuda S, Arai M, Itokawa M, Hoshi Y. Near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy shows anterior prefrontal blood volume reduction in schizophrenia but not in major depressive disorder. Sensors (Basel). (2022) 22:1594. doi: 10.3390/s22041594

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hosomi F, Yanagi M, Kawakubo Y, Tsujii N, Ozaki S, Shirakawa O. Capturing spontaneous activity in the medial prefrontal cortex using near-infrared spectroscopy and its application to schizophrenia. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:5283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41739-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Sun JJ, Liu XM, Shen CY, Feng K, Liu PZ. Abnormal prefrontal brain activation during a verbal fluency task in bipolar disorder patients with psychotic symptoms using multichannel NIRS. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2018) 14:3081–90. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S176153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kumar V, Nichenmetla S, Chhabra H, Sreeraj VS, Rao NP, Kesavan M, et al. Prefrontal cortex activation during working memory task in schizophrenia: A fNIRS study. Asian J Psychiatr. (2021) 56:102507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2005) 53:695–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Mir-Moghtadaei A, Giacobbe P, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM, Downar J. Validation of a 25% Nasion-inion heuristic for locating the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul. (2016) 9:793–5. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kay SR, FiSchizophrenia bein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. (1987) 13:261–76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Andreasen NC. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Definition and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1982) 39:784–8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290070020005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Addington D, Addington J, Maticka-Tyndale E, Joyce J. Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophr Res. (1992) 6:201–8. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(92)90003-N

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ayaz H, Shewokis PA, Bunce S, Izzetoglu K, Willems B, Onaral B. Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage. (2012) 59:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bègue I, Kaiser S, Kirschner M. Pathophysiology of negative symptom dimensions of schizophrenia – Current developments and implications for treatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2020) 116:74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.06.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Huang J, Zhang J, Zhang T, Wang P, Zheng Z. Increased prefrontal activation during verbal fluency task after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhao W, Voon V, Xue K, Xie C, Kang J, Lin CP, et al. Common abnormal connectivity in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia in pre- and post-central regions: Implications for neuromodulation targeting. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2022) 117:110556. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110556

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Li X, Wu K, Zhang Y, Kong L, Bertisch H, DeLisi LE. Altered topological characteristics of morphological brain network relate to language impairment in high genetic risk subjects and schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res. (2019) 208:338–43. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zhang Y, Li L, Bian Y, Li X, Xiao Q, Qiu M, et al. Theta-burst stimulation of TMS treatment for anxiety and depression: A FNIRS study. J Affect Disord. (2023) 325:713–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Jahn A, Nee DE, Alexander WH, Brown JW. Distinct regions within medial prefrontal cortex process pain and cognition. J Neurosci. (2016) 36:12385–92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2180-16.2016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sjoberg RL, Stalnacke M, Andersson M, Eriksson J. The supplementary motor area syndrome and cognitive control. Neuropsychologia. (2019) 129:141–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bender S, Melendez L, Schroder J, Roessner V, Resch F, Weisbrod M. Lateralized movement-related potential amplitudes differentiate between schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and major depression. Clin Neurophysiol. (2012) 123:1549–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Potkin SG, Alva G, Fleming K, Anand R, Keator D, Carreon D, et al. A PET study of the pathophysiology of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Positron emission tomography Am J Psychiatry. (2002) 159:227–37. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.227

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Dlabac-de Lange JJ, Liemburg EJ, Bais L, Renken RJ, Knegtering H, Aleman A. Effect of rTMS on brain activation in schizophrenia with negative symptoms: A proof-of-principle study. Schizophr Res. (2015) 168:475–82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.06.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Zeng L, Wang C, Sun K, Pu Y, Gao Y, Wang H, et al. Upregulation of a small-world brain network improves inhibitory control: an fNIRS neurofeedback training study. Brain Sci. (2023) 13:1516. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111516

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Samu D, Seth AK, Nowotny T. Influence of wiring cost on the large-scale architecture of human cortical connectivity. PloS Comput Biol. (2014) 10:e1003557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003557

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wang R, Liu M, Cheng X, Wu Y, Hildebrandt A, Zhou C. Segregation, integration, and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2021) 118:e2022288118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022288118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Barahona M, Pecora LM. Synchronization in small-world systems. Phys Rev Lett. (2002) 89:054101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.054101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Tagawa M, Takei Y, Kato Y, Suto T, Hironaga N, Ohki T, et al. Disrupted local beta band networks in schizophrenia revealed through graph analysis: A magnetoencephalography study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2022) 76:309–20. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13362

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Brady RO Jr., Gonsalvez I, Lee I, Ongur D, Seidman LJ, Schmahmann JD, et al. Cerebellar-prefrontal network connectivity and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. (2019) 176:512–20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040429

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Saleh Y, Jarratt-Barnham I, Fernandez-Egea E, Husain M. Mechanisms underlying motivational dysfunction in schizophrenia. Front Behav Neurosci. (2021) 15:709753. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.709753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Fulford D, Campellone T, Gard DE. Social motivation in schizophrenia: How research on basic reward processes informs and limits our understanding. Clin Psychol Rev. (2018) 63:12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Strauss GP, Esfahlani FZ, Galderisi S, Mucci A, Rossi A, Bucci P, et al. Network analysis reveals the latent structure of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. (2019) 45:1033–41. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Gribble PL, Cho SS, Strafella AP. rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates dopamine release in the ipsilateral anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex. PloS One. (2009) 4:e6725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006725

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Downar J, Geraci J, Salomons TV, Dunlop K, Wheeler S, McAndrews MP, et al. Anhedonia and reward-circuit connectivity distinguish nonresponders from responders to dorsomedial prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2014) 76:176–85. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Struckmann W, Boden R, Gingnell M, Fallmar D, Persson J. Modulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity after intermittent theta-burst stimulation in depression: Combining findings from fNIRS and fMRI. NeuroImage Clin. (2022) 34:103028. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Cheng CM, Li CT, Jeng JS, Chang WH, Lin WC, Chen MH, et al. Antidepressant effects of prolonged intermittent theta-burst stimulation monotherapy at the bilateral dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for medication and standard transcranial magnetic stimulation-resistant major depression: a three arm, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2023) 273:1433–42. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01523-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Fatakdawala I, Ayaz H, Safati AB, Sakib MN, Hall PA. Effects of prefrontal theta burst stimulation on neuronal activity and subsequent eating behavior: an interleaved rTMS and fNIRS study. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. (2023) 18:nsab023. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Dunlop K, Woodside B, Olmsted M, Colton P, Giacobbe P, Downar J. Reductions in cortico-striatal hyperconnectivity accompany successful treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder with dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2016) 41:1395–403. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Bakker N, Shahab S, Giacobbe P, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Kennedy SH, et al. rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation. Brain Stimul. (2015) 8:208–15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Doren S, Schwab SM, Bigner K, Calvelage J, Preston K, Laughlin A, et al. Evaluating the neural underpinnings of motivation for walking exercise. Phys Ther. (2024) 104:159. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar