94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Rong Liu*
Xun Tang- College of Physical Education, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China
Aims: Menopausal women often suffer from depression, which impairs their quality of life. Physical activity has been reported to exert beneficial effects on preventing and treating depression. This meta-analysis aims to explore the effect of leisure-time physical activity on determined depression or depressive symptoms in menopausal women.
Methods: Relevant studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and WanFang databases. Outcomes were depression or depressive symptoms. Weighted mean difference (WMD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the statistical measure. Heterogeneity tests were performed for each outcome, and all outcomes were subjected to sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed based on depression degree, exercise intensity, exercise form, intervention duration, supervision, sample size, and geographical region.
Results: A total of 17 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that exercise alleviated the depressive symptoms of menopausal women (SMD = −1.23; 95% CI, −2.21 to −0.24). In addition, exercise was found to reduce the depression (SMD = 11.45; 95% CI, −1.75 to −1.15), and depression assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (WMD = −5.76; 95% CI, −6.63 to −4.89) or Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) (WMD = −6.86; 95% CI, −9.24 to −4.49). The results were similar regardless of depression degrees, exercise intensity, intervention duration, exercise form, supervision or not, sample size, and geographical region.
Conclusions: Leisure-time physical activity may help alleviate depressive symptoms or depression in menopausal women. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the specific effects of physical activity on depression in this population.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024581087.
Introduction
Menopause refers to the permanent cessation of ovarian function, and menstruation is stopped for at least 12 months (1). Menopausal women will experience hot flushes, night sweats, vaginal dryness, mood swings, insomnia, and depression (2). The global prevalence of depression in menopausal women was 35.6%, with 33.9% in perimenopausal women and 34.9% in postmenopausal women (3). Depression in menopausal women has the potential to impair functional outcomes, reduce quality of life, and decrease satisfaction of life; therefore, it is important to improve depression or depressive symptoms in menopausal women (4).
Although depression is typically treated with medication and psychotherapy in clinical settings, interventions based on physical activities are increasingly recognized as an affordable, non-invasive, and easily accessible treatment for depression (5–7). Exercise has been linked to increased blood flow to the brain (8) and neurotransmitter levels, enhanced better focus (9), and improved sleep quality (10). The beneficial effect of physical activity on preventing and treating depression was observed (11). Schuch et al. reported that people with high levels of physical activity had 17% lower odds of developing depression than those with low levels (12). Brinsley et al. found that physical activity showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms than usual treatment, and greater improvement was associated with higher frequency (13). In menopausal women, the beneficial roles of physical activity in depression are also reported (14, 15). Lialy et al. found that yoga and walking decreased depression scores and the incidence of depression in menopausal women (14). Aibar-Almazán et al. performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 110 community-dwelling Spanish postmenopausal women, and results showed that a 12-week Pilates exercise intervention contributed to reducing the depression score (15). A previous meta-analysis had reported that exercise of low to moderate intensity could alleviate depressive symptoms in midlife and older women (16); however, this meta-analysis mixed women with determined depression and depressive symptoms and also does not include patients with severe depression.
In this meta-analysis, we explored the effect of physical activity on menopausal women with determined depression or depressive symptoms, respectively. We also performed subgroup analysis based on depression degrees.
Methods
The standard Cochrane methods were used in this meta-analysis, which were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (17). We have registered our review in PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42024581087.
Literature search strategy
A thorough literature review was conducted by searching multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and WanFang. The search spanned from the inception of each database up to 13 November 2024. Database searches were performed by two independent authors according to the following terms: “Aerobic” OR “Jog” OR “Walk” OR “Pilates” OR “Strength training” OR “Stretching” OR “Ambulation” OR “Yoga” OR “Swim” OR “Dance” OR “Dancing” OR “strengthening” OR “warming up” OR “cooling down” OR “Exercise” OR “Exercises” OR “Physical Activity” OR “Activities, Physical” OR “Activity, Physical” OR “Physical Activities” OR “Exercise, Physical” OR “Exercises, Physical” OR “Physical Exercise” OR “Physical Exercises” OR “Acute Exercise” OR “Acute Exercises” OR “Exercise, Acute” OR “Exercises, Acute” OR “Exercise, Isometric” OR “Exercises, Isometric” OR “Isometric Exercises” OR “Isometric Exercise” OR “Exercise, Aerobic” OR “Aerobic Exercise” OR “Aerobic Exercises” OR “Exercises, Aerobic” OR “Exercise Training” OR “Exercise Trainings” OR “Training, Exercise” OR “Trainings, Exercise” AND “perimenopause” OR “menopause” OR “menopausal” OR “postmenopause” OR “postmenopausal” OR “climacteric” OR “perimenopausal” AND “Depression” OR “Depressive Symptoms” OR “Depressive Symptom” OR “Symptom, Depressive” OR “Emotional Depression” OR “Depression, Emotional”. The search strategy of PubMed database is shown in Supplementary Data Sheet 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) population—menopausal women; (2) intervention—physical activities; (3) control—daily activities or other therapies not involving physical activities, such as dietary restrictions and psychological counseling; (4) outcome—depression or depressive symptoms assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) or Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 Items (DASS-21); and (5) study type—RCTs.
Exercise intensity was classified according to the original literature. For literature not reporting the exercise intensity, the exercise intensity was classified according to the 2011 Compendium, and metabolic equivalent (MET) values were recorded for each activity (18). Physical activity was divided into sedentary behavior (1.0–1.5 METs), light intensity (1.6–2.9 METs), moderate intensity (3–5.9 METs), and vigorous intensity (≥6 METs) (18). MET/week = exercise duration (min) × MET × frequency/week.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) animal experiments; (2) studies unable to extract valid data; (3) conference abstracts, case reports, meta-analyses, reviews, editorial materials, letters, trial registry records, or guidelines; (4) not published in Chinese or English; and (5) retracted articles.
Data extraction
Two independent authors extracted the following data: the first author, publication year, country, study design, sample size, population/depression degree, age, intervention, exercise intensity, METs, frequency, MET/week, intervention duration, exercise form (individual or team), supervised, comparison group, and depression assessment tool. A third researcher was consulted if disagreements appeared.
Quality assessment
The quality of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, which assessed the included studies based on seven items (generation of random sequence, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting bias, and other bias) (19). Each domain was divided into three categories: “low risk,” “high risk,” and “unclear risk” (19).
In this study, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence. The GRADE system evaluates the strength of evidence based on factors such as study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias (Supplementary Data Sheet 2).
Statistical analysis
When physical activity was considered as a treatment, the weighted mean difference (WMD) was utilized to compare outcomes between the intervention group and the control group. Given the variability in scales assessing, this study also applied the standardized mean difference (SMD) to compare outcomes between the intervention group and the control group. In our analysis of physical activity as a preventive measure against depressive symptoms, SMD was employed as the effect index. The effect size was expressed as a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity tests were conducted on the effect size of each outcome. In meta-analysis, assessing heterogeneity is crucial because it quantifies the variability in study outcomes that is not due to chance. The I2 statistic is a measure of this heterogeneity, and it provides an estimate of the percentage of the variability in effect sizes that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error. When the I2 value is 0%, it suggests no observed heterogeneity, and larger values indicate increasing levels of heterogeneity. If the heterogeneity statistic I2 ≥ 50%, the random-effects model was used; otherwise, the fixed effects model was used. Subgroup analysis was performed based on depression degree (mild depression and mild to moderate depression), exercise intensity (low, moderate, and moderate–vigorous), exercise form (individual exercise and team exercise), intervention duration (≤12 weeks and >12 weeks), supervised (yes or no), sample size, and geographical region. Meta-regression used in the meta-analysis was to explore whether specific study-level variables (also known as covariates or moderators) can explain variability (heterogeneity) in effect sizes across studies. All outcomes underwent sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness and stability of the results. This involved systematically re-evaluating the data by excluding individual studies one at a time to observe any changes in the overall effect size and confidence interval. By identifying how each study impacted the pooled results, the sensitivity analysis helped determine whether the findings were influenced by any single study or were consistent across the included studies. Publication bias was not assessed due to the limited number of studies included for each outcome, with fewer than 10 studies available. As tests for publication bias, such as funnel plots or Egger’s test, require a minimum of 10 studies to produce reliable results, conducting these tests with fewer studies could lead to inaccurate or misleading conclusions (20). RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to evaluate the quality of RCTs and generate the risk of bias graph and risk of bias summary. Statistical analysis for all studies was conducted using Stata15.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Study characteristics and quality assessment
A total of 3,016 publications were identified from the above-mentioned databases. After excluding 1,121 duplicates, 1,895 publications remained. After screening titles and abstracts, 1,788 publications were excluded. In the remaining 107 publications, 84 publications were further excluded due to subjects not meeting the requirements after screening the full text (Supplementary Data Sheet 3). Finally, 17 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis (1, 21–36) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1. The flowchart of studies selection.
Of the included studies, six studies (21, 31, 32, 34–36) reported the depressive symptoms in menopausal women. The characteristics of these studies are shown in Table 1. A total of 11 studies (1, 22–30, 33) reported depression in menopausal women, and the characteristics are shown in Table 2. Risk of bias assessment is shown in Figures 2A, B.
Table 1
Table 1. Characteristics of studies including menopausal women with depressive symptoms.
Table 2
Table 2. Characteristics of studies including menopausal women with depression.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph (A) and summary (B) for the included RCTs. RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Effect of physical activity on the prevention of depressive symptoms in menopausal women
After exercise, depressive symptoms of menopausal women were alleviated in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = −1.23; 95% CI, −2.21 to −0.24; I2 = 94.4%) (Figure 3, Table 3). As for exercise intensity, depressive symptoms were reduced in menopausal women receiving low-intensity exercise (SMD = −1.63; 95% CI, −2.03 to −1.23). As for intervention duration, exercise >12 weeks was found to improve depressive symptoms (SMD = −2.60; 95% CI, −4.51 to −0.68). In addition, the depressive symptoms were alleviated after exercise under supervision (SMD = −1.59; 95% CI, −2.91 to −0.27) (Table 3). Physical activity was found to significantly reduce depressive symptoms in menopausal women as measured by the BDI (SMD = −3.58; 95% CI, −4.17 to −3.01), CES-D (SMD = −1.63; 95% CI, −2.03 to −1.23; p <0.001), and SDS (SMD = −0.98; 95% CI, −1.49 to −0.46; p <0.001). However, no significant effects were observed using the GDS (SMD = −0.32; 95% CI, −1.01 to 0.37; p =0.359) or DASS-21 (SMD = −0.386; 95% CI, −1.086 to 0.313; p =0.279). In terms of sample size, studies with ≥100 participants (SMD = −2.60; 95% CI, -4.51 to −0.68; p =0.008) and <100 participants (SMD = −0.535; 95% CI, −0.983 to −0.087, p =0.019) both showed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms after exercise (Table 3). In terms of geographical region, a significant reduction in depressive symptoms was observed after exercise in studies conducted in Europe (SMD = −3.59; 95% CI, −4.17 to −3.01; p <0.001). In East Asia, the effect was moderate and statistically significant (SMD = −0.89; 95% CI, −1.57 to −0.15; p = 0.018). However, Middle Eastern studies did not show a significant effect (SMD = −0.39; 95% CI, −1.09 to 0.31; p =0.279) (Table 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plots of the effects of physical activity on depressive symptoms of menopausal women.
Table 3
Table 3. Effect of physical activity on the prevention of depressive symptoms in menopausal women.
The regression analyses were conducted on the duration of intervention, exercise form, supervised, and sample size, with results showing a p-value >0.05. This suggested that the duration of intervention, exercise form, supervised, and sample size were unlikely to be a source of heterogeneity in the outcome (Supplementary Table S1).
Effect of physical activity on the treatment of depression in menopausal women
Four studies reported depression assessed by CES-D. The pooled results showed that exercise improved depression in menopausal women (WMD = −5.76; 95% CI, −6.63 to −4.89; I2 = 0.0%) (Figure 4A). The similar results were found in menopausal women receiving vigorous (WMD = −6.24; 95% CI, −8.15 to −4.33), moderate (WMD = −5.47; 95% CI, −6.88 to −4.05), moderate–vigorous (WMD = −5.78; 95% CI, −7.14 to −4.42) exercise intensity, with exercise >12 weeks (WMD = −5.78; 95% CI, −7.14 to −4.42) or ≤12 weeks (WMD = −5.74; 95% CI, −6.87 to −4.61). Five studies reported depression assessed by SDS. The pooled results showed that depression was alleviated after exercise (WMD = −6.86; 95% CI, −9.24 to −4.49; I2 = 91.7%) (Figure 4B). Similar results were found in menopausal women with different depression degrees, exercise intensity, intervention duration, exercise form, supervision or not, sample size, and geographical region (Table 4). In our analysis, the SMD was also used as the summary effect measure for assessing the impact of physical activity on the treatment of depression in menopausal women. The result showed a significant reduction in depression with physical activity treatment (SMD = −1.45; 95% CI, −1.75 to −1.15) (Table 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest plots of the effects of physical activity on depression assessed by CES-D (A) and SDS (B). CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression. Scale; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale.
Table 4
Table 4. Effect of physical activity on depression in menopausal women.
This meta-analysis further conducted a regression analysis to explore potential factors contributing to heterogeneity. In the regression analysis, the result found that the duration of intervention, exercise form, and supervision did not have a significant impact on the outcomes (p > 0.05), indicating that these variables were not sources of heterogeneity (Supplementary Table S2).
Abedi et al. (1) reported depression assessed by the BDI and found that the depression level was reduced after 12 weeks of exercise. Gutiérrez et al. (28) reported depression assessed by GDS and found that physical exercise for menopausal women alleviated the depression.
Sensitivity analysis
The results of the sensitivity analysis showed no significant changes in the overall effect estimates when individual studies were systematically excluded. This consistency across analyses suggests that our findings are robust and not unduly influenced by any single study. The stability of these results supports the reliability of our conclusions.
Discussion
This meta-analysis explored the effect of physical activity on menopausal women with determined depression or depressive symptoms. The results showed that depressive symptoms of menopausal women were alleviated after exercise. The result was similar in menopausal women receiving low intensity of exercise, team exercise, exercise > 12 weeks, or under supervision. In addition, exercise improved depression in menopausal women. The result was similar regardless of depression degrees, exercise intensity, intervention duration, exercise form, supervision or not, sample size, and geographical region.
Menopause is a natural and inevitable stage in the aging process of women, which is caused by the depletion of ovarian follicles (3). Menopausal women are more susceptible to facing psychological problems under multiple pressures from society, family, work, and life, and some of them may exhibit depressive symptoms or suffer from depression (3, 27). The risk of depressive symptoms or depressive disorders doubles to quadruples during the menopausal transition (3). Exercise can maintain the level of estrogen and progesterone in the body and enhance the functions of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and nervous systems (27). Physical activities affect individuals’ physiology and psychology and are regarded as an effective behavior intervention for depression (37). Existing evidence has shown that physical activity is beneficial for the prevention of depression (38, 39). Kim et al. found in a cohort study that an optimal amount of physical activity reduced the onset of depressive symptoms (38). Li et al. also found that running exercise protected hippocampal astrocytes and decreased the production of new astrocytes, thus preventing the central nervous system from damage and reducing the occurrence of depressive symptoms (39). In this meta-analysis, we found that physical activity alleviated depressive symptoms in menopausal women, indicating that physical activity could be a feasible therapy to prevent depression in menopausal women. A cross-sectional study reported that exercise intensity, duration, and type were closely related to depression (40). Low intensity exercise, such as yoga, has been reported to enhance menopausal women’s ability to control negative emotional experiences and have a positive effect on improving their mental state, thereby improving depressive symptoms (34). This meta-analysis found that low-intensity exercise alleviated the depressive symptoms of menopausal women. Our meta-analysis also showed that depressive symptoms were improved after team exercise, exercise > 12 weeks, or exercise under supervision, which was consistent with the previous studies (21, 31, 34).
Globally, 35.6% of menopausal women were diagnosed with depression (3), and physical activity is a treatment for patients with determined depression (41). The pooled results of this meta-analysis displayed that physical activity improved determined depression in menopausal women. There are several potential mechanisms accounting for this finding. First, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is lower in older adults and patients with depression (42, 43), and a decrease in BDNF is associated with an increased risk of depression (44). Physical activity is found to increase the brain blood flow, thereby increasing the synthesis and release of BDNF (45), indicating that physical activity may reduce the risk of depression by increasing BDNF concentrations. Second, a decrease in serotonin concentration is found to be associated with depression (46), and exercises have been shown to modulate circulating levels of serotonin in patients with depression (47). Third, depression is associated with the activation of innate immune responses and mild systemic inflammation (48, 49). With the decrease in estrogen level, the protective antioxidant benefits and anti-inflammatory effects of estrogen are weakened, and menopausal women are likely to face an increased risk of depression (50). Exercise is found to exert antidepressant effects by regulating oxidative stress (37). Our meta-analysis also displayed that regardless of depression degree, exercise intensity, intervention duration, exercise form, or whether being supervised, physical activity showed a beneficial role in the treatment of depression. These findings suggested that physical activity might be an effective adjuvant therapy to treat depression in menopausal women.
This meta-analysis exclusively incorporates randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thereby enhancing the methodological rigor of the evidence presented. This study also conducts subgroup analyses based on various factors, including the degree of depression, exercise intensity, type of exercise, duration of intervention, presence or absence of supervision, sample size, and geographical region. In addition, a study indicates that commonly used depression scales all demonstrate good internal consistency (51). The factor analysis results of these scales suggest that, despite their differing factor structures, they complement each other in assessing depressive symptoms or depression. However, there are some limitations in this meta-analysis. First, the considerable variation in exercise types among the included studies prevented us from conducting a detailed analysis by specific exercise modalities. This lack of consistency in intervention types may influence the overall outcomes and contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Consequently, the findings may not fully capture the potential differential effects of various exercise forms. Although we attempted to address this through sensitivity and subgroup analyses, the inherent variability remains a factor that should be considered when interpreting the results. This limitation underscores the need for more standardized interventions in future studies to better isolate and understand the effects of specific types of exercise. Second, the number of studies that reported the depressive symptoms of menopausal women is relatively small, which may affect the stability of the results. In addition, many of the studies included had relatively small sample sizes, which may impact the statistical power of our findings and increase the risk of bias. Smaller sample sizes may lead to less reliable estimates, and caution should be taken when interpreting the results. Third, the quality of some of the literature is low, which could influence the reliability and generalizability of the findings. The lower quality of the studies may introduce bias, such as selective reporting, small sample sizes, and lack of blinding, all of which can affect the validity of the results. Future studies with improved methodological rigor are needed to confirm and strengthen the evidence on this topic. Fourth, a key limitation of our study is the focus on leisure-time physical activity, which does not capture the full range of physical activity domains including occupational, transportation, and housework activities. This narrow scope was chosen due to the predominance of leisure-time physical activity in the existing literature on depression or depressive symptoms in menopausal women, the consistency in measurement across studies, and the relevance of leisure-time physical activity to public health interventions. While our meta-analysis provides specific insights into the impact of leisure-time physical activity, it may not be extrapolated to other forms of physical activity. We acknowledge the need for future research to explore the effects of occupational, transportation, and housework physical activities on mental health in menopausal women, offering a more comprehensive view of physical activity’s role in managing depression during this life stage. Fifth, another major limitation of our study is the high heterogeneity among the studies we analyzed, which could affect the trustworthiness of our results. This is a common issue in meta-analyses with various interventions. To address this, we conducted subgroup analyses. We also performed a meta-regression to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. However, some heterogeneity remains unexplained, indicating a need for more standardized interventions in future research to improve study comparability and strengthen our findings. Sixth, the sensitivity analysis, while useful for identifying the stability of our results, may not fully capture all sources of bias or variation within the studies. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research with more refined methodologies is needed to address these limitations.
Conclusion
Given the limitations in study quality and methodology, the evidence on the effect of leisure-time physical activity on depressive symptoms in menopausal women is of low to moderate certainty. While physical activity may be a feasible intervention, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
RL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1480623/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Abedi P, Nikkhah P, Najar S. Effect of pedometer-based walking on depression, anxiety and insomnia among postmenopausal women. Climacteric. (2015) 18:841–5. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1065246
2. Minkin MJ. Menopause: hormones, lifestyle, and optimizing aging. Obstet Gynecol Clinics North Am. (2019) 46:501–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2019.04.008
3. Jia Y, Zhou Z, Xiang F, Hu W, Cao X. Global prevalence of depression in menopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2024) 358:474–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.051
4. Li J, Liu F, Liu Z, Li M, Wang Y, Shang Y, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depression in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. (2024) 24:431. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05875-0
5. Sabella D. Antidepressant medications. Am J Nursing. (2018) 118:52–9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000544978.56301.f6
6. Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Eckshtain D, Ng MY, Corteselli KA, Noma H, et al. Psychotherapy for depression across different age groups: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2020) 77:694–702. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0164
7. Pearce M, Garcia L, Abbas A, Strain T, Schuch FB, Golubic R, et al. Association between physical activity and risk of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2022) 79:550–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609
8. Bailey TG, Cable NT, Aziz N, Dobson R, Sprung VS, Low DA, et al. Exercise training reduces the frequency of menopausal hot flushes by improving thermoregulatory control. Menopause. (2016) 23:708–18. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000625
9. Ng QX, Ho CYX, Chan HW, Yong BZJ, Yeo WS. Managing childhood and adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with exercise: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. (2017) 34:123–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.08.018
10. Xu H, Liu J, Li P, Liang Y. Effects of mind-body exercise on perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause. (2024) 31:457–67. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000002336
11. Chen C, Beaunoyer E, Guitton MJ, Wang J. Physical activity as a clinical tool against depression: opportunities and challenges. J Integr Neurosci. (2022) 21:132. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2105132
12. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Firth J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Silva ES, et al. Physical activity and incident depression: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Psychiatry. (2018) 175:631–48. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194
13. Brinsley J, Schuch F, Lederman O, Girard D, Smout M, Immink MA, et al. Effects of yoga on depressive symptoms in people with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:992–1000. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101242
14. Lialy HE, Mohamed MA, AbdAllatif LA, Khalid M, Elhelbawy A. Effects of different physiotherapy modalities on insomnia and depression in perimenopausal, menopausal, and post-menopausal women: a systematic review. BMC Women’s Health. (2023) 23:363. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02515-9
15. Aibar-Almazán A, Hita-Contreras F, Cruz-Díaz D, de la Torre-Cruz M, Jiménez-García JD, Martínez-Amat A. Effects of Pilates training on sleep quality, anxiety, depression and fatigue in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. (2019) 124:62–7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.019
16. Pérez-López FR, Martínez-Domínguez SJ, Lajusticia H, Chedraui P. Effects of programmed exercise on depressive symptoms in midlife and older women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Maturitas. (2017) 106:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.09.001
17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
18. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr., Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exercise. (2011) 43:1575–81. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
19. Rong H, Bao Y, Wen Z, Chen X, Chen C, Li F. Nebulized versus invasively delivered surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2020) 99:e23113. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000023113
20. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. (2011) 343:d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002
21. Bernard P, Ninot G, Bernard PL, Picot MC, Jaussent A, Tallon G, et al. Effects of a six-month walking intervention on depression in inactive post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Ment Health. (2015) 19:485–92. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.948806
22. Chen J, Bai Y, Jin Y, Zhang L. Effect of different exercises on physical and mental health of menopausal women. J Beijing Sport Univ. (2017) 40:62–7.
23. Ma S, Dou N, Chen C, Zhao Y, Wu W. Comparison of therapeutic effects of skipping rope and Baduanjin fitness exercises on patients with perimenopausal syndrome and depressive symptoms. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil. (2011) 33:49–51.
24. Elsayed MM, El Refaye GE, Rabiee A, Abouzeid S, Elsisi HF. Aerobic exercise with diet induces hormonal, metabolic, and psychological changes in postmenopausal obese women. Heliyon. (2022) 8:e09165. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09165
25. Gao L, Zhang L, Qi H, Petridis L. Middle-aged female depression in perimenopausal period and square dance intervention. Psychiatria Danubina. (2016) 28:372–8.
26. Gao J, Wang X, Zhang W, Gu J, Weng X, Yu G, et al. The application effect of ear acupuncture combined with baduanjin on depression in perimenopausal women. J Clin Res. (2023) 40:816–9.
27. Guo Q, Chen C. Rehabilitation effect of rope skipping on patients with perimenopausal syndrome complicated with depressien. Chin Nurs Res. (2011) 25:422–3.
28. Villaverde Gutiérrez C, Torres Luque G, Ábalos Medina GM, Argente del Castillo MJ, Guisado IM, Guisado Barrilao R, et al. Influence of exercise on mood in postmenopausal women. J Clin Nursing. (2012) 21:923–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03972.x
29. Liang P, He Y. Rehabilitation effect of rope skipping exercise on perimenopausal syndrome and depression. Reflexol Rehabil Med. (2020) 1:145–7.
30. Ma S, Dou N, Chen C, Zhao Y. Rehabilitation effects of walking and baduanjin to the perimenopausal syndrome with depression. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2011) 26:738–41.
31. Pang Y, Kim O. Effects of smartphone-based compensatory cognitive training and physical activity on cognition, depression, and self-esteem in women with subjective cognitive decline. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:1029. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081029
32. Takahashi M, Lim PJ, Tsubosaka M, Kim HK, Miyashita M, Suzuki K, et al. Effects of increased daily physical activity on mental health and depression biomarkers in postmenopausal women. J Phys Ther Sci. (2019) 31:408–13. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.408
33. Yi S, Tan A. Observation of Th erapeutic Eff ects of Musicokinetic Th erapy on Perimenopausal Syndrome. Chin J Evidence-Based Med. (2013) 13:943–6.
34. Zhao A, Liu H. Study on state of spirit and body of women in climacteric period by yoga. China J Health Psychol. (2011) 19:1274–6.
35. Abdoshahi M. The impact of pilates training on mental health and happiness among untrained menopausal women. Women Health Bull. (2023) 10:96–103. doi: 10.30476/WHB.2023.97578.1211
36. Sun XT, Tang F, Kang L, Liu SZ. Effect of aerobic combined with resistance exercise on the quality of survival of women with menopausal syndrome. Anhui Med J. (2023) 44:1323–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2023.11.010
37. Kandola A, Ashdown-Franks G, Hendrikse J, Sabiston CM, Stubbs B. Physical activity and depression: Towards understanding the antidepressant mechanisms of physical activity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2019) 107:525–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.040
38. Kim SY, Park JH, Lee MY, Oh KS, Shin DW, Shin YC. Physical activity and the prevention of depression: A cohort study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2019) 60:90–7. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.07.010
39. Li Y, Luo Y, Tang J, Liang X, Wang J, Xiao Q, et al. The positive effects of running exercise on hippocampal astrocytes in a rat model of depression. Trans Psychiatry. (2021) 11:83. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01216-x
40. Fernandez-Montero A, Moreno-Galarraga L, Sánchez-Villegas A, Lahortiga-Ramos F, Ruiz-Canela M, Martínez-González M, et al. Dimensions of leisure-time physical activity and risk of depression in the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) prospective cohort. BMC Psychiatry. (2020) 20:98. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02502-6
41. Schuch FB, Stubbs B. The role of exercise in preventing and treating depression. Curr Sports Med Rep. (2019) 18:299–304. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000620
42. Zhou C, Zhong J, Zou B, Fang L, Chen J, Deng X, et al. Meta-analyses of comparative efficacy of antidepressant medications on peripheral BDNF concentration in patients with depression. PloS One. (2017) 12:e0172270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172270
43. Molendijk ML, Spinhoven P, Polak M, Bus BA, Penninx BW, Elzinga BM. Serum BDNF concentrations as peripheral manifestations of depression: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analyses on 179 associations (N=9484). Mol Psychiatry. (2014) 19:791–800. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.105
44. Erickson KI, Miller DL, Roecklein KA. The aging hippocampus: interactions between exercise, depression, and BDNF. Neurosci: Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry. (2012) 18:82–97. doi: 10.1177/1073858410397054
45. Coelho FG, Gobbi S, Andreatto CA, Corazza DI, Pedroso RV, Santos-Galduróz RF. Physical exercise modulates peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF): a systematic review of experimental studies in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics. (2013) 56:10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.003
46. Pannu A, Goyal RK. Serotonin and depression: scrutiny of new targets for future anti- depressant drug development. Curr Drug Targets. (2023) 24:816–37. doi: 10.2174/1389450124666230425233727
47. Ross RE, VanDerwerker CJ, Saladin ME, Gregory CM. The role of exercise in the treatment of depression: biological underpinnings and clinical outcomes. Mol Psychiatry. (2023) 28:298–328. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01819-w
48. Beurel E, Toups M, Nemeroff CB. The bidirectional relationship of depression and inflammation: double trouble. Neuron. (2020) 107:234–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.002
49. Bhatt S, Nagappa AN, Patil CR. Role of oxidative stress in depression. Drug Discovery Today. (2020) 25:1270–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.05.001
50. Soares CN. Menopause and mood: the role of estrogen in midlife depression and beyond. Psychiatr Clinics North Am. (2023) 46:463–73. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2023.04.004
Keywords: physical activity, depressive symptoms, depression, menopausal women, depression degree
Citation: Liu R and Tang X (2025) Effect of leisure-time physical activity on depression and depressive symptoms in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Psychiatry 15:1480623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1480623
Received: 14 August 2024; Accepted: 17 December 2024;
Published: 30 January 2025.
Edited by:
Qin Xiang Ng, Singapore General Hospital, SingaporeReviewed by:
Peizhen Zhang, Beijing Sport University, ChinaNikita Saraswat, Dr. DY Patil College of Pharmacy, India
Copyright © 2025 Liu and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rong Liu, TGl1cm9uZ0BjZHUuZWR1LmNu